Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> General Board >> a referendum we actually need
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1660099461

Message started by freediver on Aug 10th, 2022 at 12:44pm

Title: a referendum we actually need
Post by freediver on Aug 10th, 2022 at 12:44pm
If we are going ahead with the referendum, they should take the opportunity to close the constitutional loophole that allows whatever party gets control of the senate after a double dissolution election to grant themselves extra seats.

https://www.ozpolitic.com/electoral-reform/broken-promises-stolen-senate-seats.html

https://www.ozpolitic.com/electoral-reform/electoral-fraud-bipartisan-support-senators.html

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Aug 10th, 2022 at 4:09pm
Hear, hear .....

Of course, when mutual benefit is available, bi-partisan support is endless....

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by freediver on Aug 10th, 2022 at 4:22pm
Please contact your local rep and senators and put the suggestion to them:


Quote:
https://www.aph.gov.au/Senators_and_Members/Guidelines_for_Contacting_Senators_and_Members


Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Yadda on Aug 10th, 2022 at 4:24pm

OP......

Electoral/parliamentary reform in Australia ?          Dracula.....blood bank.



'Tell him he's dreaming!'


.


A bureaucrat is said to oppose any change, except that which increases his own power.
- ???





Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Frank on Aug 11th, 2022 at 8:49pm

freediver wrote on Aug 10th, 2022 at 12:44pm:
If we are going ahead with the referendum, they should take the opportunity to close the constitutional loophole that allows whatever party gets control of the senate after a double dissolution election to grant themselves extra seats.

https://www.ozpolitic.com/electoral-reform/broken-promises-stolen-senate-seats.html

https://www.ozpolitic.com/electoral-reform/electoral-fraud-bipartisan-support-senators.html

Leeetle bit obscure and... er... peripheral.


Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by freediver on Aug 11th, 2022 at 8:53pm
It changes the election outcome.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Frank on Aug 11th, 2022 at 9:02pm

freediver wrote on Aug 11th, 2022 at 8:53pm:
It changes the election outcome.

Meh...

Not really.


Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Yadda on Aug 11th, 2022 at 9:09pm


An example of the type of political reform in Australia which i would like to see....

If any Federal government can't balance its [our] budget, then    retired    politicians [at that time] will only be entitled to the [exact] same pension payments as other Australians.



p.s.
'Tell him he's dreaming!'

;D




Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by freediver on Aug 11th, 2022 at 9:16pm

Frank wrote on Aug 11th, 2022 at 9:02pm:

freediver wrote on Aug 11th, 2022 at 8:53pm:
It changes the election outcome.

Meh...

Not really.


It changes the number of seats held by different groups. It can change the balance of power in the Senate, and what legislation is able to be passed.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Yadda on Aug 11th, 2022 at 9:22pm

Yadda wrote on Aug 11th, 2022 at 9:09pm:


If any Federal government can't balance its [our] budget, then    retired    politicians [at that time] will only be entitled to the [exact] same pension payments as other Australians.



i.e.
In those circumstances, retired politicians should be entitled to [the calculation of the] super contributions which they themselves have paid in.

But not entitled to the top-up super contributions which were paid in by their employer, i.e. contributions from the taxpayer.




Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Aug 11th, 2022 at 10:50pm

Yadda wrote on Aug 11th, 2022 at 9:22pm:

Yadda wrote on Aug 11th, 2022 at 9:09pm:


If any Federal government can't balance its [our] budget, then    retired    politicians [at that time] will only be entitled to the [exact] same pension payments as other Australians.



i.e.
In those circumstances, retired politicians should be entitled to [the calculation of the] super contributions which they themselves have paid in.

But not entitled to the top-up super contributions which were paid in by their employer, i.e. contributions from the taxpayer.



Yes - put 'em on the same as everyone else... I worked for the CPS and it was dollar for dollar.... going through recruitment right now, at age 73, to save their arses again when the spoiler hits the fan in Europe and the Asia Pacific Basin and they're gonna need all the help they can get ...... as looks likely... this time I expect a bit of tit-for-tat for saving their arses as I've done all my life....

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Aug 11th, 2022 at 10:51pm

freediver wrote on Aug 11th, 2022 at 9:16pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 11th, 2022 at 9:02pm:

freediver wrote on Aug 11th, 2022 at 8:53pm:
It changes the election outcome.

Meh...

Not really.


It changes the number of seats held by different groups. It can change the balance of power in the Senate, and what legislation is able to be passed.



Yes - and so wrong..... on all fronts...

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by freediver on Aug 15th, 2022 at 6:26pm
The ALP and UAP were the only parties to get back to me on this. The UAP seemed interested.

The ALP did their best to insist it was too late to add any other questions to the referendum (BS, they are basically back to the drawing board on "the voice"), but kept saying it might happen in the future if more work is done. In particular, they seem to think more consultation is needed, even though it has been written into (non-binding) legislation already and both major parties have repeatedly made public commitments to it.

All the details are already sorted out and agreed with pretty much unanimous support. The ALP just wants to be able to take advantage of the current situation to steal more senate seats.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by freediver on Aug 30th, 2022 at 6:46am
Just got another feeble excuse from Labor - they do not need to fix this problem because one day they will make Australia a republic. Not sure what they plan to do with the Senate if we do become a republic, or when they plan to make it happen.

Still no response from the other parties.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Gnads on Aug 30th, 2022 at 8:22am

freediver wrote on Aug 15th, 2022 at 6:26pm:
The ALP and UAP were the only parties to get back to me on this. The UAP seemed interested.

The ALP did their best to insist it was too late to add any other questions to the referendum (BS, they are basically back to the drawing board on "the voice"), but kept saying it might happen in the future if more work is done. In particular, they seem to think more consultation is needed, even though it has been written into (non-binding) legislation already and both major parties have repeatedly made public commitments to it.

All the details are already sorted out and agreed with pretty much unanimous support. The ALP just wants to be able to take advantage of the current situation to steal more senate seats.



I'd take any interest from Palmers UAP with a grain of salt.

Palmer & Craig Kelly?  ;D ;D Pair of self serving clowns.

UAP didn't win any seats in the lower house last election.

UAP candidate Ralph Babet picked up Victoria’s sixth Senate seat – thanks to preferences from the LNP.

That's all Palmer got for his obscene campaign spending of $100 million.

UAP leader Craig Kelly lost his seat of Hughes, and Palmer failed in his bid for a Queensland Senate seat. ;D

1 Senator - why would you waste the effort sending them any correspondence?

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by MeisterEckhart on Aug 30th, 2022 at 4:24pm

freediver wrote on Aug 30th, 2022 at 6:46am:
Just got another feeble excuse from Labor - they do not need to fix this problem because one day they will make Australia a republic. Not sure what they plan to do with the Senate if we do become a republic, or when they plan to make it happen.

That truly is a pathetic response.

Who sent you the response? Peter Fitzsimons?

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by freediver on Aug 30th, 2022 at 6:18pm

Quote:
1 Senator - why would you waste the effort sending them any correspondence?


All it takes is 1.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Xavier on Aug 30th, 2022 at 7:57pm
A hung Parliment is better.
"Hang em High"
...it might force them to 'work together' for once.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Xavier on Aug 30th, 2022 at 8:01pm

freediver wrote on Aug 30th, 2022 at 6:46am:
Just got another feeble excuse from Labor - they do not need to fix this problem because one day they will make Australia a republic. Not sure what they plan to do with the Senate if we do become a republic, or when they plan to make it happen.

Still no response from the other parties.


And how do you suppose they will do that?
The Aborigines won't be happy about some USURPER Republic displacing this country being returned to them when the USA voids and the British capitulate here.

Wanna Republic? Well the price to pay for it will be BLOOD.
...and who's blood does the ALP think they will sacrifice for it?

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by freediver on Sep 3rd, 2022 at 3:12pm
Labor got back to me again, to reassure me that:

1) They have no intention to steal senate seats. No explanation of why they stole them last time and why we should believe they won't keep doing it. Or even any acknowledgement that Labor stealing senate seats is a reality.

2) There is no prospect of a DD election in the short term - not sure how they can predict this either, given that they only hold 26 of the 76 Senate seats, and even with the Greens do not hold a majority.

3) There is still time to find other ways to allocate senate seats after a DD election - again, no explanation of what is wrong with the method that they have already publicly committed themselves to on multiple occasions, other than the fact that they keep breaking their promises and refuse to write it into the constitution.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Xavier on Sep 3rd, 2022 at 8:48pm
ALP & NLP (Blue collars and White Collars - both = 'workers')
are just a fart-version of the American North/South (neither East or West).

Both ALP & NLP will fizz out in under 30 years.
They won't have the power in a few decades to make these big decisions anymore.

Both will be caught in bed together having Politically Correct  Homosex while dressed in Media Women's clothes.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by freediver on Sep 3rd, 2022 at 8:56pm
Say no to drugs Jasin.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Xavier on Sep 3rd, 2022 at 9:08pm

freediver wrote on Sep 3rd, 2022 at 8:56pm:
Say no to drugs Jasin.


America - the conquest of space (across an ocean)
Australia - the conquest of time (in a 40,000 year prison)

Not my fault the future is plain to see and you're still stuck at the End of the World for America. ;)

Btw - Australia will fracture into many 'independent' nations.
How's that for you FD? ;)

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Xavier on Sep 3rd, 2022 at 9:17pm
PS: I'm the one member you'll never catch FD. ;)
Night.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by freediver on Sep 3rd, 2022 at 9:17pm
Far out, man.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Bobby. on Sep 3rd, 2022 at 9:20pm

freediver wrote on Sep 3rd, 2022 at 9:17pm:
Far out, man.



Sometimes JaSin sounds like Dennis Hopper:


https://www.bitchute.com/video/3QXuh2t5tKsv/

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Xavier on Sep 4th, 2022 at 2:53am
FD has plans for you Bobby.
He is clear in his mind.
But his soul is mad.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Bobby. on Sep 4th, 2022 at 6:49am

Jasin wrote on Sep 4th, 2022 at 2:53am:
FD has plans for you Bobby.
He is clear in his mind.
But his soul is mad.



What are they gunna say?
That he was wise man?
that he was a brave man?
that he had plans?
that he had wisdom?

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Xavier on Sep 4th, 2022 at 8:35am

Bobby. wrote on Sep 4th, 2022 at 6:49am:

Jasin wrote on Sep 4th, 2022 at 2:53am:
FD has plans for you Bobby.
He is clear in his mind.
But his soul is mad.



What are they gunna say?
That he was wise man?
that he was a brave man?
that he had plans?
that he had wisdom?

;D

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Bobby. on Sep 4th, 2022 at 3:42pm

Jasin wrote on Sep 4th, 2022 at 8:35am:

Bobby. wrote on Sep 4th, 2022 at 6:49am:

Jasin wrote on Sep 4th, 2022 at 2:53am:
FD has plans for you Bobby.
He is clear in his mind.
But his soul is mad.



What are they gunna say?
That he was wise man?
that he was a brave man?
that he had plans?
that he had wisdom?

;D


Am I gunna be the one to set him straight?

Look at me wrong.


https://www.bitchute.com/video/3QXuh2t5tKsv/


Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 4th, 2022 at 3:51pm

Jasin wrote on Sep 3rd, 2022 at 9:08pm:

freediver wrote on Sep 3rd, 2022 at 8:56pm:
Say no to drugs Jasin.


America - the conquest of space (across an ocean)
Australia - the conquest of time (in a 40,000 year prison)

Not my fault the future is plain to see and you're still stuck at the End of the World for America. ;)

Btw - Australia will fracture into many 'independent' nations.
How's that for you FD? ;)


A House divided against itself cannot stand - clearly that is the full aim and intention of New International Labor.... that Australia must fall.....

"...... and so it came to pass, in the year 2027, the the Old Abo South passed away forever..... remember it only in Pascoe's books of wild fantasy and in fiction ... for it is a life and times, a civilisation..... Gone With The Wind........

....as the seemingly endless lists of casualties from the battle of Maccasburgers were posted on the post office wall.... amidst the wailing of the Aboriginal women and children left alone...... Yothu Yindi struck up the anthem Solid Rock ........"


Australia Has Fallen

starring Gerard Butler

A Grappler Studios Production


........ coming soon to a theatre near you .......................

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Xavier on Sep 5th, 2022 at 7:57am
It's more a case Grapps.
That American Politics 'rises' from the weak many States into a 'One God' individual President as the empowerment.

Australia on the other hand, is the weak individual PM on behalf of the international arena - specifically being a 'deputy' for the USA. 'Falling' down through the States into Provincials into many independent nations of their own.
The empowerment of the 'many'.

USA = President, individual
Aust = Nations, the mass

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Xavier on Sep 5th, 2022 at 7:59am

Bobby. wrote on Sep 4th, 2022 at 3:42pm:

Jasin wrote on Sep 4th, 2022 at 8:35am:

Bobby. wrote on Sep 4th, 2022 at 6:49am:

Jasin wrote on Sep 4th, 2022 at 2:53am:
FD has plans for you Bobby.
He is clear in his mind.
But his soul is mad.



What are they gunna say?
That he was wise man?
that he was a brave man?
that he had plans?
that he had wisdom?

;D


Am I gunna be the one to set him straight?

Look at me wrong.


https://www.bitchute.com/video/3QXuh2t5tKsv/

FD has plans for you Bobby. ;)

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by FutureTheLeftWant on Sep 7th, 2022 at 9:15am

freediver wrote on Aug 10th, 2022 at 12:44pm:
If we are going ahead with the referendum, they should take the opportunity to close the constitutional loophole that allows whatever party gets control of the senate after a double dissolution election to grant themselves extra seats.

https://www.ozpolitic.com/electoral-reform/broken-promises-stolen-senate-seats.html

https://www.ozpolitic.com/electoral-reform/electoral-fraud-bipartisan-support-senators.html


I'd like a referendum on the idea of votes being weighted by IQ.  The right wing would disappear overnight.  The alternative is a quiz that denies people the vote if they believe right wing conspiracy theories

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 7th, 2022 at 9:20am
Yardle Award Contender - sadly in our form of democracy even the abysmally stupid and craven can vote on equal terms..... IQ is a false measure of true intelligence....

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by FutureTheLeftWant on Sep 7th, 2022 at 9:31am

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 9:20am:
Yardle Award Contender - sadly in our form of democracy even the abysmally stupid and craven can vote on equal terms..... IQ is a false measure of true intelligence....


IQ is not perfect but it would have the same effect.  Why should the future of my country be decided in part by people who think vaccines kill and there's kids kidnapped in tunnels?

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 7th, 2022 at 9:38am

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 9:31am:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 9:20am:
Yardle Award Contender - sadly in our form of democracy even the abysmally stupid and craven can vote on equal terms..... IQ is a false measure of true intelligence....


IQ is not perfect but it would have the same effect.  Why should the future of my country be decided in part by people who think vaccines kill and there's kids kidnapped in tunnels?


... or by people who imagine that changing the constitution to offer some inside running to a minority group of one sort only will actually make any positive difference to this nation or to the real problems of that group and will result in anything more than encouraging them to go for more and more endlessly, or that acceding to every wish of a religious minority will somehow keep the lid on any extremism from that group......

Most people just walk on by when the anti-vaccers get on their band wagon, and what's the story on these kids kidnapped in tunnels?  Haven't heard that theory....

Is that some new fantastic theory?

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by FutureTheLeftWant on Sep 7th, 2022 at 9:43am

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 9:38am:

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 9:31am:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 9:20am:
Yardle Award Contender - sadly in our form of democracy even the abysmally stupid and craven can vote on equal terms..... IQ is a false measure of true intelligence....


IQ is not perfect but it would have the same effect.  Why should the future of my country be decided in part by people who think vaccines kill and there's kids kidnapped in tunnels?


... or by people who imagine that changing the constitution to offer some inside running to a minority group of one sort only will actually make any positive difference to this nation or to the real problems of that group and will result in anything more than encouraging them to go for more and more endlessly, or that acceding to every wish of a religious minority will somehow keep the lid on any extremism from that group......

Most people just walk on by when the anti-vaccers get on their band wagon, and what's the story on these kids kidnapped in tunnels?  Haven't heard that theory....

Is that some new fantastic theory?


You've not heard of Q Anon? But you're far right? HAHAHAHAA!!!

I'll ignore the racist BS.  Yes, we're making society better.  Cry.

What religious minority is being pandered to, if not Christians? HAHAHAHAA!!!!

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 7th, 2022 at 9:48am

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 9:43am:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 9:38am:

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 9:31am:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 9:20am:
Yardle Award Contender - sadly in our form of democracy even the abysmally stupid and craven can vote on equal terms..... IQ is a false measure of true intelligence....


IQ is not perfect but it would have the same effect.  Why should the future of my country be decided in part by people who think vaccines kill and there's kids kidnapped in tunnels?


... or by people who imagine that changing the constitution to offer some inside running to a minority group of one sort only will actually make any positive difference to this nation or to the real problems of that group and will result in anything more than encouraging them to go for more and more endlessly, or that acceding to every wish of a religious minority will somehow keep the lid on any extremism from that group......

Most people just walk on by when the anti-vaccers get on their band wagon, and what's the story on these kids kidnapped in tunnels?  Haven't heard that theory....

Is that some new fantastic theory?


You've not heard of Q Anon? But you're far right? HAHAHAHAA!!!

I'll ignore the racist BS.  Yes, we're making society better.  Cry.

What religious minority is being pandered to, if not Christians? HAHAHAHAA!!!!



Total delusion....... HAHAHAHAHAA!!!

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by FutureTheLeftWant on Sep 7th, 2022 at 9:50am

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 9:48am:
Total delusion....... HAHAHAHAHAA!!!


This must be the fabled debating ability of the right wing. Why would I care about being banned from a group where those who oppose me cannot prove me wrong, or explain why they believe the nonsense they do?

Who gets more special treatment in this country than Christians? Muslims? Because we allow them to what? Live here without being threatened too often?

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 7th, 2022 at 10:01am
Just like arbitrarily labeling anyone with a different view as 'extreme right' and a Fascist... well, well... that boot on the other foot hurts, eh?

What preferential treatment do Christians get?  I mean - they are the majority religious group here and have been for centuries, so where are there, for example, 'other' schools that do not receive funding etc?

Give us some clear examples..... empty words are meaningless and are the province of the extremist desperately seeking to dance outside the circle of reality so that he/she doesn't get burned by the fire of truth around which all others gather...

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by FutureTheLeftWant on Sep 7th, 2022 at 10:06am

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 10:01am:
Just like arbitrarily labeling anyone with a different view as 'extreme right' and a Fascist... well, well... that boot on the other foot hurts, eh?

What preferential treatment do Christians get?  I mean - they are the majority religious group here and have been for centuries, so where are there, for example, 'other' schools that do not receive funding etc?

Give us some clear examples..... empty words are meaningless and are the province of the extremist desperately seeking to dance outside the circle of reality so that he/she doesn't get burned by the fire of truth around which all others gather...


What I love most is that SOMEONE must have called you a fascist, because I'm not saying that :)

They are not the majority any more but they've had plenty of free passes, free land, etc.  No other religious group comes close.

The defence of Pell after he raped children was a clear example of the church being untouchable in this country.  All the money that Christian schools get from taxpayers to teach kids hate is another.  My son went to a Catholic school and I was only told later all the ignorant poo they were told

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 7th, 2022 at 10:15am
Well they have been here the longest - the wondering/wandering little groups had no real society to speak of and thus all those things naturally accrued to the developing majority.

You called me 'extreme right' - showing that you have little connection with reality.... lovely to watch your constantly self-destruct while trying desperately to push some mythical barrow.

What was that about kids in tunnels? 

Pell didn't rape children.... his offence was in a different category, and he should have taken action against perverts, but he didn't personally rape them, unless you are speaking of rights, the rape of rights is a very pervasive area - and one which I doubt you want to enter.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by FutureTheLeftWant on Sep 7th, 2022 at 10:44am

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 10:15am:
Well they have been here the longest - the wondering/wandering little groups had no real society to speak of and thus all those things naturally accrued to the developing majority.

You called me 'extreme right' - showing that you have little connection with reality.... lovely to watch your constantly self-destruct while trying desperately to push some mythical barrow.

What was that about kids in tunnels? 

Pell didn't rape children.... his offence was in a different category, and he should have taken action against perverts, but he didn't personally rape them, unless you are speaking of rights, the rape of rights is a very pervasive area - and one which I doubt you want to enter.


In fact they had rich societies.  You confuse the ones who live in the desert (because it's all we left them) with all of them

You have never seen me self destruct.  You have cried and run from debate.  LOL!!!

Q Anon.

"Pell, who is on leave from his role in Rome as Vatican treasurer, was found guilty of sexually penetrating a child under the age of 16 "

First google hit

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 7th, 2022 at 12:01pm
Course they did - kangaroo on the barbie, all the yams they could eat.... peace and tranquility all through the land..... zero cannibalism ... sharing everything in true brotherly love ...... short lifespan ... massive child mortality ...

You were there, I take it?  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D

I love a daily dose of ideologue...

You..... errr... got any references for that?

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by FutureTheLeftWant on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:03pm

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 12:01pm:
Course they did - kangaroo on the barbie, all the yams they could eat.... peace and tranquility all through the land..... zero cannibalism ... sharing everything in true brotherly love ...... short lifespan ... massive child mortality ...

You were there, I take it?  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D

I love a daily dose of ideologue...

You..... errr... got any references for that?


It would involve books, which you despise.  Of course they were not cannibals.  Of course they had similar infant mortality to the west at the time, I would expect..../.

The average lifespan in the west was what, 40, at the time? Mostly due to child mortality

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by freediver on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:03pm

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 9:15am:

freediver wrote on Aug 10th, 2022 at 12:44pm:
If we are going ahead with the referendum, they should take the opportunity to close the constitutional loophole that allows whatever party gets control of the senate after a double dissolution election to grant themselves extra seats.

https://www.ozpolitic.com/electoral-reform/broken-promises-stolen-senate-seats.html

https://www.ozpolitic.com/electoral-reform/electoral-fraud-bipartisan-support-senators.html


I'd like a referendum on the idea of votes being weighted by IQ.  The right wing would disappear overnight.  The alternative is a quiz that denies people the vote if they believe right wing conspiracy theories


No-one is surprised by your eagerness to disenfranchise people. You would have us ruled by the CCP in no time.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by FutureTheLeftWant on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:05pm

freediver wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:03pm:
No-one is surprised by your eagerness to disenfranchise people. You would have us ruled by the CCP in no time.


I love the right crying about China.

I don't think people with no connection to reality should vote.  If we had proper mental health services, 20% of the right would be locked up

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by freediver on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:10pm

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:05pm:

freediver wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:03pm:
No-one is surprised by your eagerness to disenfranchise people. You would have us ruled by the CCP in no time.


I love the right crying about China.

I don't think people with no connection to reality should vote.  If we had proper mental health services, 20% of the right would be locked up


Are your ideas for putting a large chunk of the population behind bars for their own good inspired by the CCP?

It's kind of ironic that someone with ideas as loony as yours is saying these things.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by FutureTheLeftWant on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:11pm

freediver wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:10pm:

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:05pm:

freediver wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:03pm:
No-one is surprised by your eagerness to disenfranchise people. You would have us ruled by the CCP in no time.


I love the right crying about China.

I don't think people with no connection to reality should vote.  If we had proper mental health services, 20% of the right would be locked up


Are your ideas for putting a large chunk of the population behind bars for their own good inspired by the CCP?

It's kind of ironic that someone with ideas as loony as yours is saying these things.


It's weird how you can't read English

The far right think there's kids in tunnels, vaccines kill people and Trump won.  These are delusions that prevent them functioning in society and they should be in some sort of assisted living facility

Please list my loony ideas, in contrast to all the times you've run from debating me?

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by freediver on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:13pm

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:11pm:

freediver wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:10pm:

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:05pm:

freediver wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:03pm:
No-one is surprised by your eagerness to disenfranchise people. You would have us ruled by the CCP in no time.


I love the right crying about China.

I don't think people with no connection to reality should vote.  If we had proper mental health services, 20% of the right would be locked up


Are your ideas for putting a large chunk of the population behind bars for their own good inspired by the CCP?

It's kind of ironic that someone with ideas as loony as yours is saying these things.


It's weird how you can't read English

The far right think there's kids in tunnels, vaccines kill people and Trump won.  These are delusions that prevent them functioning in society and they should be in some sort of assisted living facility

Please list my loony ideas, in contrast to all the times you've run from debating me?


Denying people the right to vote because you don't like what they think.

Like I said, it is no surprise. You have been ranting against democracy in your efforts to support the CCP.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by FutureTheLeftWant on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:17pm

freediver wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:13pm:
Denying people the right to vote because you don't like what they think.

Like I said, it is no surprise. You have been ranting against democracy in your efforts to support the CCP.


I can't tell if you are illiterate or lying.  You are certainly not responding to anything I said.  That you refuse to back your spurious claims is no surprise

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:32pm
Jim Crow 2.0, innit? If'n them ain;t lit-rate enuff ter read thu paper wot we gives 'em - they cain't vote sensible!!

Amazing how those who rail against the 'right' so often adhere to the philosophies of the Oppressive 'right' in their pursuit of truth, justice and the Australian Way (RIP)... the Australian Way would have been all over that arsehole with his rip off the Abos over their funeral fund nonsense, and had him cutting rocks for a new Parliament House or a new prison to house all the politicians bent...

We're gonna need a bigger Big House...

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by FutureTheLeftWant on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:43pm

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:32pm:
*snip all the ignorant BS


Would you look at that!!!!

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by freediver on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:46pm

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:17pm:

freediver wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:13pm:
Denying people the right to vote because you don't like what they think.

Like I said, it is no surprise. You have been ranting against democracy in your efforts to support the CCP.


I can't tell if you are illiterate or lying.  You are certainly not responding to anything I said.  That you refuse to back your spurious claims is no surprise


You want to systematically deny people that you identify as right wing the right to vote. By locking them up. And just like the CCP, you insist it is for their own good. This is loony tunes stuff, and you do not even realise it. It's like you cannot even see daylight from where you are posting.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by FutureTheLeftWant on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:47pm

freediver wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:46pm:

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:17pm:

freediver wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:13pm:
Denying people the right to vote because you don't like what they think.

Like I said, it is no surprise. You have been ranting against democracy in your efforts to support the CCP.


I can't tell if you are illiterate or lying.  You are certainly not responding to anything I said.  That you refuse to back your spurious claims is no surprise


You want to systematically deny people that you identify as right wing the right to vote. By locking them up. This is loony tunes stuff, and you do not even realise it. It's like you cannot even see daylight from where you are posting.


Look, I can see you are simple.  I didn't suggest any of this.  Keep projecting.

I suggested that people who fall for far right conspiracies like Q Anon are clearly not competent enough to vote.  And that only idiots vote to the right, I don't want to deny them a vote, just weigh it by their ability to think rationally

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by freediver on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:48pm

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:05pm:
I love the right crying about China.

I don't think people with no connection to reality should vote.  If we had proper mental health services, 20% of the right would be locked up


Like I said, loony tunes stuff.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by FutureTheLeftWant on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:48pm

freediver wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:48pm:

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:05pm:
I love the right crying about China.

I don't think people with no connection to reality should vote.  If we had proper mental health services, 20% of the right would be locked up


Like I said, loony tunes stuff.


"20% of the right"  Yes, that's what I said.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by freediver on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:49pm

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:48pm:

freediver wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:48pm:

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:05pm:
I love the right crying about China.

I don't think people with no connection to reality should vote.  If we had proper mental health services, 20% of the right would be locked up


Like I said, loony tunes stuff.


"20% of the right"  Yes, that's what I said.


And like I said, you do not even realise how loony it is. Or ironic.

No wonder you are such a fan of the CCP. Totally detached from reality, but you believe your own spin.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by FutureTheLeftWant on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:58pm

freediver wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:49pm:

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:48pm:

freediver wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:48pm:

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:05pm:
I love the right crying about China.

I don't think people with no connection to reality should vote.  If we had proper mental health services, 20% of the right would be locked up


Like I said, loony tunes stuff.


"20% of the right"  Yes, that's what I said.


And like I said, you do not even realise how loony it is. Or ironic.

No wonder you are such a fan of the CCP. Totally detached from reality, but you believe your own spin.


In the first instance I've never particularly praised the CCP.  China just triggers boomer racists

In the second, I am pointing out that a portion of the right are not mentally competent and should not decide how society works.  Why is this wrong?

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by freediver on Sep 7th, 2022 at 2:18pm

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:58pm:

freediver wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:49pm:

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:48pm:

freediver wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:48pm:

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:05pm:
I love the right crying about China.

I don't think people with no connection to reality should vote.  If we had proper mental health services, 20% of the right would be locked up


Like I said, loony tunes stuff.


"20% of the right"  Yes, that's what I said.


And like I said, you do not even realise how loony it is. Or ironic.

No wonder you are such a fan of the CCP. Totally detached from reality, but you believe your own spin.


In the first instance I've never particularly praised the CCP.  China just triggers boomer racists

In the second, I am pointing out that a portion of the right are not mentally competent and should not decide how society works.  Why is this wrong?


Nazi sympathisers don't tend to go round praising Hitler either. They have to be slightly more subtle. For example, they might start by thinking up excuses for denying people they don't like the right to vote. They don't open with gas chambers.

Are you suggesting that left wing people generally do not have a problem with the CCP starving 50 million people to death by trying to feed them? I think you are vastly overestimating the number of people who agree with you.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 7th, 2022 at 2:20pm

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:58pm:
In the first instance I've never particularly praised the CCP.  China just triggers boomer racists

In the second, I am pointing out that a portion of the right are not mentally competent and should not decide how society works.  Why is this wrong?


If 'boomers' - by no means a contiguous group - were 'racist' - most of the newbies wouldn't even be here... we are the generation that opened the flood gates to subsumation by the Third World...... stupid, I agree... but there it is.

What factual data do you have to support the view that 20% of the 'right' (a by no means contiguous group by any means) would be mentally incompetent?

You bin readin' 'bout Young Jethro down on thet bridge playin' thet banjo to passin' canoes o' city slicker tourists again, boy?  No gits you hands off'n you sistah there an' git on down thet bridge an' tell Jethro it's his schoolin' time, an' if he don' make third grade he'll never be Town Mayor here... or Sheriff or Judge or anythung normal.....

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by FutureTheLeftWant on Sep 7th, 2022 at 2:25pm

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 2:20pm:

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 1:58pm:
In the first instance I've never particularly praised the CCP.  China just triggers boomer racists

In the second, I am pointing out that a portion of the right are not mentally competent and should not decide how society works.  Why is this wrong?


If 'boomers' - by no means a contiguous group - were 'racist' - most of the newbies wouldn't even be here... we are the generation that opened the flood gates to subsumation by the Third World...... stupid, I agree... but there it is.

What factual data do you have to support the view that 20% of the 'right' (a by no means contiguous group by any means) would be mentally incompetent?

You bin readin' 'bout Young Jethro down on thet bridge playin' thet banjo to passin' canoes o' city slicker tourists again, boy?  No gits you hands off'n you sistah there an' git on down thet bridge an' tell Jethro it's his schoolin' time, an' if he don' make third grade he'll never be Town Mayor here... or Sheriff or Judge or anythung normal.....


So you're a racist. Cool.

At least 20% of the right wing scum I see believe the things I listed.  I am not suggesting 20% is a rule, the things i listed are the rule

I can't even make sense of the last brain fart you posted

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 7th, 2022 at 3:37pm
Nothing racist about a fair comment on immigration..... racism is if a person says all those brought in deserve to be hated as a group....

Immigration here needs a full review and consultation with all stakeholders..... the past forty years or so under a darkening social science sky have not been very encouraging, to say the least.

I'm in favour of stopping all immigration, not just that from the turd factories of the world...... we need to stabilise and restore sanity here first before we can become the Mother Takerina of everywhere else...

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by FutureTheLeftWant on Sep 7th, 2022 at 4:22pm

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 3:37pm:
Nothing racist about a fair comment on immigration..... racism is if a person says all those brought in deserve to be hated as a group....

Immigration here needs a full review and consultation with all stakeholders..... the past forty years or so under a darkening social science sky have not been very encouraging, to say the least.

I'm in favour of stopping all immigration, not just that from the turd factories of the world...... we need to stabilise and restore sanity here first before we can become the Mother Takerina of everywhere else...



Turd factories is certainly not racist, lol!!!


Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Xavier on Sep 7th, 2022 at 4:29pm
Grapps - stop encouraging the wanker. ::)

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by FutureTheLeftWant on Sep 7th, 2022 at 4:43pm

Jasin wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 4:29pm:
Grapps - stop encouraging the wanker. ::)


I love when y'all point out my post count and I'm just answering your bs....

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 7th, 2022 at 5:02pm

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 4:43pm:

Jasin wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 4:29pm:
Grapps - stop encouraging the wanker. ::)


I love when y'all point out my post count and I'm just answering your bs....



Funny thing is - that's what we keep doing with you...

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 7th, 2022 at 5:03pm

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 4:22pm:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 3:37pm:
Nothing racist about a fair comment on immigration..... racism is if a person says all those brought in deserve to be hated as a group....

Immigration here needs a full review and consultation with all stakeholders..... the past forty years or so under a darkening social science sky have not been very encouraging, to say the least.

I'm in favour of stopping all immigration, not just that from the turd factories of the world...... we need to stabilise and restore sanity here first before we can become the Mother Takerina of everywhere else...



Turd factories is certainly not racist, lol!!!


If it produces turd, it is a turd factory.... it's a nice way of saying sh1thole.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by FutureTheLeftWant on Sep 7th, 2022 at 5:07pm

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 5:02pm:

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 4:43pm:

Jasin wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 4:29pm:
Grapps - stop encouraging the wanker. ::)


I love when y'all point out my post count and I'm just answering your bs....


Hahahahaha!!!

*Gasp*

Hahahaha!!!

All you've ever done is cry and run from debate. I get bans when I shame you too much


Funny thing is - that's what we keep doing with you...


Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 7th, 2022 at 7:21pm
Funny thing is - that's what we keep doing with you...

Learn to quote, software genius etc...... 


Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by FutureTheLeftWant on Sep 7th, 2022 at 7:56pm

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 7:21pm:
Funny thing is - that's what we keep doing with you...

Learn to quote, software genius etc...... 



It's actually entertaining that you can't see what ever sane person sees, that I expose and shame you all you do is cry

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Xavier on Sep 7th, 2022 at 8:14pm

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 7:56pm:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 7:21pm:
Funny thing is - that's what we keep doing with you...

Learn to quote, software genius etc...... 



It's actually entertaining that you can't see what ever sane person sees, that I expose and shame you all you do is cry

He needs to learn quite a few things, by the look of it.  ::)

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by FutureTheLeftWant on Sep 7th, 2022 at 8:15pm

Jasin wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 8:14pm:

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 7:56pm:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 7:21pm:
Funny thing is - that's what we keep doing with you...

Learn to quote, software genius etc...... 



It's actually entertaining that you can't see what ever sane person sees, that I expose and shame you all you do is cry

He needs to learn quite a few things, by the look of it.  ::)


It's pathetic . Why reply when all you're going to do is cry??!

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Xavier on Sep 7th, 2022 at 8:17pm
Wasn't posting to you Mr Illiterate.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by FutureTheLeftWant on Sep 7th, 2022 at 8:31pm

Jasin wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 8:17pm:
Wasn't posting to you Mr Illiterate.


New to the internet? Cool

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 7th, 2022 at 8:58pm
Anyway - I like the original idea posted here... pity we stray so far at times... too much static... white noise..... you know..

Political parties need to be brought to heel..... not more heels brought to them....

All I do is laugh..... such puerile nonsense .... tantrum ...

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by FutureTheLeftWant on Sep 7th, 2022 at 9:06pm

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 8:58pm:
Anyway - I like the original idea posted here... pity we stray so far at times... too much static... white noise..... you know..

Political parties need to be brought to heel..... not more heels brought to them....

All I do is laugh..... such puerile nonsense .... tantrum ...


Take your meds, mate. Let the pretty lady last you to bed.....

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 7th, 2022 at 11:15pm
Grasping again... desperate and triggered..... got 'im!  Always his master in every move...

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by FutureTheLeftWant on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:00am

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 11:15pm:
Grasping again... desperate and triggered..... got 'im!  Always his master in every move...


You don't get it, do you? You never debate me.  If you raise a point, it's not one I made.  You are not an interesting person to debate on the internet, you're a sad lonely hateful old man.  I answer you for the same reason young boys poke an ants nest with a stick.  To enjoy their pain.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:10am
" If you raise a point, it's not one I made. "

Ego much - so you are now admitting that YOU will not debate me about anything too factual for you to handle?  If you design software, sonny - stay away from payroll and other important issues for people's lives - you'd be the kind that developed paradigms for Robodebt.

You are what I'd call a hack - as opposed to a scientifically based software engineer.

Oh - sorry - I did do a course in that as well...

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by FutureTheLeftWant on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:27am

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:10am:
" If you raise a point, it's not one I made. "

Ego much - so you are now admitting that YOU will not debate me about anything too factual for you to handle?  If you design software, sonny - stay away from payroll and other important issues for people's lives - you'd be the kind that developed paradigms for Robodebt.

You are what I'd call a hack - as opposed to a scientifically based software engineer.

Oh - sorry - I did do a course in that as well...


I did in fact answer your ignorant bullshit.  It was simply not a counter to my claim, but to a claim you made up

Get your glasses checked, old man

yes, the left love Robodebt.  LOL!!!

Which particular sciences are pertinent to my software development?  What about me having morals and shaming right wing filth on the internet educates you on my knowledge of C#, SQL and Typescript?

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:31am

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:27am:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:10am:
" If you raise a point, it's not one I made. "

Ego much - so you are now admitting that YOU will not debate me about anything too factual for you to handle?  If you design software, sonny - stay away from payroll and other important issues for people's lives - you'd be the kind that developed paradigms for Robodebt.

You are what I'd call a hack - as opposed to a scientifically based software engineer.

Oh - sorry - I did do a course in that as well...


I did in fact answer your ignorant bullshit.  It was simply not a counter to my claim, but to a claim you made up

Get your glasses checked, old man

yes, the left love Robodebt.  LOL!!!

Which particular sciences are pertinent to my software development?  What about me having morals and shaming right wing filth on the internet educates you on my knowledge of C#, SQL and Typescript?


Utterly missed the realities, as usual... and now we descend into the usual that will get you banned - the ad homs and personal slights in place of any valid argument..

Go back and read the links on AWE and AHW - try again, child.  If your treatment of Elders is anything to go by, and your handling of facts - you have zero morals.

You have to understand the REALITY of how any science or issue works before you can develop adequate and relevant software for it.  Easy-peasy ... you can't even work out the simple figures for AWE/Hours worked and come up with figures.... and your total unwillingness to read relevant documents speaks for itself.

Make sure you stay away from other people's money, sonny.... stick to writing kid's games....

;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D

I am your master at every step.    ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:34am

freediver wrote on Aug 10th, 2022 at 12:44pm:
If we are going ahead with the referendum, they should take the opportunity to close the constitutional loophole that allows whatever party gets control of the senate after a double dissolution election to grant themselves extra seats.

https://www.ozpolitic.com/electoral-reform/broken-promises-stolen-senate-seats.html

https://www.ozpolitic.com/electoral-reform/electoral-fraud-bipartisan-support-senators.html


Now, infants - do you think for one moment you could actually discuss the issue raised here by Fearless Leader?  Or would you rather piss on his parade and wonder aimlessly in your personal fantasy land?

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by FutureTheLeftWant on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:36am

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:31am:

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:27am:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:10am:
" If you raise a point, it's not one I made. "

Ego much - so you are now admitting that YOU will not debate me about anything too factual for you to handle?  If you design software, sonny - stay away from payroll and other important issues for people's lives - you'd be the kind that developed paradigms for Robodebt.

You are what I'd call a hack - as opposed to a scientifically based software engineer.

Oh - sorry - I did do a course in that as well...


I did in fact answer your ignorant bullshit.  It was simply not a counter to my claim, but to a claim you made up

Get your glasses checked, old man

yes, the left love Robodebt.  LOL!!!

Which particular sciences are pertinent to my software development?  What about me having morals and shaming right wing filth on the internet educates you on my knowledge of C#, SQL and Typescript?


Utterly missed the realities, as usual... and now we descend into the usual that will get you banned - the ad homs and personal slights in place of any valid argument..

Go back and read the links on AWE and AHW - try again, child.  If your treatment of Elders is anything to go by, and your handling of facts - you have zero morals.

You have to understand the REALITY of how any science or issue works before you can develop adequate and relevant software for it.  Easy-peasy ... you can't even work out the simple figures for AWE/Hours worked and come up with figures.... and your total unwillingness to read relevant documents speaks for itself.

Make sure you stay away from other people's money, sonny.... stick to writing kid's games....

;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D

I am your master at every step.    ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D


I agree, you can insult me and post racist hate, but I'll get a ban for answering.  Have you not worked out I don't care?

I have lots of morals.  I treat old people with respect when they are not human garbage.

That's not really true LOL!! I don't deeply understand the businesses I write software for.  I get given one PBI at a time and I follow those business rules without ever getting a broader picture, I don't need one.  I often write systems for things and don't understand WHY they exist, only how they work. 

The fact is, women are paid less.  This is literally maths.  No, you are a worthless old man spewing hate.  You never answer me or debate me, why would I give you the time of day? I'm just having fun laughing at you


Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:48am
Can't begin to discuss the issue in this strand, eh?

;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by FutureTheLeftWant on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:50am

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:48am:
Can't begin to discuss the issue in this strand, eh?

;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D


I've answered every moronic thing you said, boomer.  List the things I've not answered?

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:50am

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:36am:
I agree, you can insult me and post racist hate, but I'll get a ban for answering.  Have you not worked out I don't care?

I have lots of morals.  I treat old people with respect when they are not human garbage.

That's not really true LOL!! I don't deeply understand the businesses I write software for.  I get given one PBI at a time and I follow those business rules without ever getting a broader picture, I don't need one.  I often write systems for things and don't understand WHY they exist, only how they work. 

The fact is, women are paid less.  This is literally maths.  No, you are a worthless old man spewing hate.  You never answer me or debate me, why would I give you the time of day? I'm just having fun laughing at you


;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D

Clearly your understanding of maths is on a par with your morals and your intellectual capacity....

Too scared to do the actual figures, eh?    ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D

You are so weak and ineffectual.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:51am

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:50am:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:48am:
Can't begin to discuss the issue in this strand, eh?

;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D


I've answered every moronic thing you said, boomer.  List the things I've not answered?


The issue raised here - you've spent pages trying to drag me down to your level and spiting anyone else with any different view .... you are incompetent in life.

;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by FutureTheLeftWant on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:52am

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:51am:

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:50am:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:48am:
Can't begin to discuss the issue in this strand, eh?

;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D


I've answered every moronic thing you said, boomer.  List the things I've not answered?


The issue raised here - you've spent pages trying to drag me down to your level and spiting anyone else with any different view .... you are incompetent in life.

;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D


Two replies.  I've triggered you again.

Women are paid less.  This is SIMPLE maths.  LOL!! You are just crying

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Gnads on Sep 8th, 2022 at 9:02am

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:36am:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:31am:

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:27am:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:10am:
" If you raise a point, it's not one I made. "

Ego much - so you are now admitting that YOU will not debate me about anything too factual for you to handle?  If you design software, sonny - stay away from payroll and other important issues for people's lives - you'd be the kind that developed paradigms for Robodebt.

You are what I'd call a hack - as opposed to a scientifically based software engineer.

Oh - sorry - I did do a course in that as well...


I did in fact answer your ignorant bullshit.  It was simply not a counter to my claim, but to a claim you made up

Get your glasses checked, old man

yes, the left love Robodebt.  LOL!!!

Which particular sciences are pertinent to my software development?  What about me having morals and shaming right wing filth on the internet educates you on my knowledge of C#, SQL and Typescript?


Utterly missed the realities, as usual... and now we descend into the usual that will get you banned - the ad homs and personal slights in place of any valid argument..

Go back and read the links on AWE and AHW - try again, child.  If your treatment of Elders is anything to go by, and your handling of facts - you have zero morals.

You have to understand the REALITY of how any science or issue works before you can develop adequate and relevant software for it.  Easy-peasy ... you can't even work out the simple figures for AWE/Hours worked and come up with figures.... and your total unwillingness to read relevant documents speaks for itself.

Make sure you stay away from other people's money, sonny.... stick to writing kid's games....

;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D

I am your master at every step.    ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D


I agree, you can insult me and post racist hate, but I'll get a ban for answering.  Have you not worked out I don't care?

I have lots of morals.  I treat old people with respect when they are not human garbage.

That's not really true LOL!! I don't deeply understand the businesses I write software for.  I get given one PBI at a time and I follow those business rules without ever getting a broader picture, I don't need one.  I often write systems for things and don't understand WHY they exist, only how they work. 

The fact is, women are paid less.  This is literally maths.  No, you are a worthless old man spewing hate.  You never answer me or debate me, why would I give you the time of day? I'm just having fun laughing at you



That is 100% pure fantasy ... in "fact" it's a bloody lie.

Women are not paid less.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Gnads on Sep 8th, 2022 at 9:02am
##

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by FutureTheLeftWant on Sep 8th, 2022 at 9:23am

Gnads wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 9:02am:
That is 100% pure fantasy ... in "fact" it's a bloody lie.

Women are not paid less.


Did you get tagged?

Why are women paid less then?

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 8th, 2022 at 1:15pm

Yadda wrote on Aug 11th, 2022 at 9:09pm:


An example of the type of political reform in Australia which i would like to see....

If any Federal government can't balance its [our] budget, then    retired    politicians [at that time] will only be entitled to the [exact] same pension payments as other Australians.


well.....speaking of reform: the currency-issuing government ought be free from usurious private sector money lenders.....so government (the public sector) can oversee resource mobilization on behalf of the <commonwealth>, rather than being constrained  by private sector greed.

...ie, currency-issuing government are  constrained by the nation's available resources, not money which is created solely by self-interested  private sector financiers. 

Balanced budgets are necessary for USERS of the currency (you and me), not the ISSUER (private or public) of the currency. 








Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by freediver on Sep 9th, 2022 at 9:55pm

freediver wrote on Aug 30th, 2022 at 6:46am:
Just got another feeble excuse from Labor - they do not need to fix this problem because one day they will make Australia a republic. Not sure what they plan to do with the Senate if we do become a republic, or when they plan to make it happen.

Still no response from the other parties.


It just occurred to me that maybe the real reason Labor is stalling on the voice referendum is because they were anticipating the Queen's death, and want to throw in a republic referendum sooner than they have been letting on.

Both ideas seem to have the same problem - lack of detail. And both ideas lack detail because no-one likes what they see, if they ever get to see it.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Xavier on Sep 10th, 2022 at 5:40am
All that they can comprehend is a copycat of the Irish Republic cliche.

Think of this Forum becoming a Republic FD.
It means that you - as leader, becomes the 'sacrificial goat' on behalf of the people.
Unlike the Northern Hemisphere Politics, regardless of format - where the 'People' are the sacrifice, not the leader.

Come FD, die for our 'political' sins. ;)

...those Trolls here want your blood anyway.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 10th, 2022 at 8:32am

freediver wrote on Sep 9th, 2022 at 9:55pm:
Both ideas seem to have the same problem - lack of detail. And both ideas lack detail because no-one likes what they see, if they ever get to see it.


see how conservatives fuss about the letter of the law;

a voice is just that, an advice from black communities to Parliament - which may or may not be taken; and removal of the UK monarch as head of state in Oz.   (The issue of electing an Oz head of state is minor, though people think their "freedom" is at stake)

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by freediver on Sep 10th, 2022 at 8:39am

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 8:32am:

freediver wrote on Sep 9th, 2022 at 9:55pm:
Both ideas seem to have the same problem - lack of detail. And both ideas lack detail because no-one likes what they see, if they ever get to see it.


see how conservatives fuss about the letter of the law;

a voice is just that, an advice from black communities to Parliament - which may or may not be taken; and removal of the UK monarch as head of state in Oz.   (The issue of electing an Oz head of state is minor, though people think their "freedom" is at stake)


It is not a change to the law. It is a change to the constitution. It would be incredibly stupid and naďve (like supporting the CCP) to ignore the detail and hope for the best.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Gnads on Sep 10th, 2022 at 8:44am

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 9:23am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 9:02am:
That is 100% pure fantasy ... in "fact" it's a bloody lie.

Women are not paid less.


Did you get tagged?

Why are women paid less then?


They aren't.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Gnads on Sep 10th, 2022 at 8:49am

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 8:32am:

freediver wrote on Sep 9th, 2022 at 9:55pm:
Both ideas seem to have the same problem - lack of detail. And both ideas lack detail because no-one likes what they see, if they ever get to see it.


see how conservatives fuss about the letter of the law;

a voice is just that, an advice from black communities to Parliament - which may or may not be taken; and removal of the UK monarch as head of state in Oz.   (The issue of electing an Oz head of state is minor, though people think their "freedom" is at stake)


Phark me hooray - they already have a voice & the mechanisms to be heard in Parliament ...

that's what 15 plus elected Aboriginal MPs and Senators are there for.......

how does this continually escape you?

They do not need a duplication or a non elected voice directly to PARLIAMENT.

It's a nonsense.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 10th, 2022 at 9:07am

Gnads wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 8:49am:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 8:32am:

freediver wrote on Sep 9th, 2022 at 9:55pm:
Both ideas seem to have the same problem - lack of detail. And both ideas lack detail because no-one likes what they see, if they ever get to see it.


see how conservatives fuss about the letter of the law;

a voice is just that, an advice from black communities to Parliament - which may or may not be taken; and removal of the UK monarch as head of state in Oz.   (The issue of electing an Oz head of state is minor, though people think their "freedom" is at stake)


Phark me hooray - they already have a voice & the mechanisms to be heard in Parliament ...


No they have c 15 separate voices (according to you) in Parliament, displaying the usual L-R divide.


Quote:
that's what 15 plus elected Aboriginal MPs and Senators are there for.......

how does this continually escape you?


Addressed above. A consensus voice as opposed to the 15 separate voices currently in Parliament.


Quote:
They do not need a duplication or a non elected voice directly to PARLIAMENT.


The voice would represent a 'black party' (though without actually existing as a party in parliament), as the ALP represents the voice of the Oz centre left, for exmple.


Quote:
It's a nonsense.


Refuted above.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Gnads on Sep 10th, 2022 at 9:50am

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 9:07am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 8:49am:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 8:32am:

freediver wrote on Sep 9th, 2022 at 9:55pm:
Both ideas seem to have the same problem - lack of detail. And both ideas lack detail because no-one likes what they see, if they ever get to see it.


see how conservatives fuss about the letter of the law;

a voice is just that, an advice from black communities to Parliament - which may or may not be taken; and removal of the UK monarch as head of state in Oz.   (The issue of electing an Oz head of state is minor, though people think their "freedom" is at stake)


Phark me hooray - they already have a voice & the mechanisms to be heard in Parliament ...


No they have c 15 separate voices (according to you) in Parliament, displaying the usual L-R divide.


Quote:
that's what 15 plus elected Aboriginal MPs and Senators are there for.......

how does this continually escape you?


Addressed above. A consensus voice as opposed to the 15 separate voices currently in Parliament.

[quote]They do not need a duplication or a non elected voice directly to PARLIAMENT.


The voice would represent a 'black party' (though without actually existing as a party in parliament), as the ALP represents the voice of the Oz centre left, for exmple.


Quote:
It's a nonsense.


Refuted above.
[/quote]

Your refutation isn't worth squat.

Does everyone else get a consensus voice?

Or does the plethora of separate voices above the Aboriginal 15 ..... all they have to make do with? ::)

What you say is a discriminatory race based notion.... and not workable.

It's nothing more than symbolic appeasement based on race.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 10th, 2022 at 9:55am
Well - only a fool would buy a pig in a poke, and one that is subject to change at any time by the incumbent government - meaning, in this case, that New Labor International will slowly but surely give this 'voice' more and more power and control.

No, thanks.  they can take their place with the rest of us - and that applies to everything else as well.

When do I get back lands held by my ancestors?

Finalise all this land claims nonsense, get it over and end it now.  Give 'em enough to make a fair go of it - rise or fall on their own merits and efforts.

It's 2022 - and most people are struggling to own a block of land let alone a huge swathe of it given for nothing.

Enough!!

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 10th, 2022 at 9:58am
'dividie' doesn't 'refute' anything - he simply offers a rhetorical different opinion - that is not refuting - it is merely offering an opinion.

A few here make that mistake, some deliberately, since they are both uneducated and essentially childish in their approach to life and discussion.

Their 'refutation' is like that Monty Python sketch...

"No it's not..."

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 10th, 2022 at 10:39am

Gnads wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 9:50am:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 9:07am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 8:49am:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 8:32am:

freediver wrote on Sep 9th, 2022 at 9:55pm:
Both ideas seem to have the same problem - lack of detail. And both ideas lack detail because no-one likes what they see, if they ever get to see it.


see how conservatives fuss about the letter of the law;

a voice is just that, an advice from black communities to Parliament - which may or may not be taken; and removal of the UK monarch as head of state in Oz.   (The issue of electing an Oz head of state is minor, though people think their "freedom" is at stake)


Phark me hooray - they already have a voice & the mechanisms to be heard in Parliament ...


No they have c 15 separate voices (according to you) in Parliament, displaying the usual L-R divide.


Quote:
that's what 15 plus elected Aboriginal MPs and Senators are there for.......

how does this continually escape you?


Addressed above. A consensus voice as opposed to the 15 separate voices currently in Parliament.

[quote]They do not need a duplication or a non elected voice directly to PARLIAMENT.


The voice would represent a 'black party' (though without actually existing as a party in parliament), as the ALP represents the voice of the Oz centre left, for exmple.

[quote]It's a nonsense.


Refuted above.
[/quote]

Your refutation isn't worth squat.

Does everyone else get a consensus voice?[/quote]

The point is blacks need a 'consensus voice' to advise parliament, so long as the gap exists; whereas non-blacks are catered for, by centre Left and centre Right parties who fight it out over disadvantage within the non-black community.


Quote:
Or does the plethora of separate voices above the Aboriginal 15 ..... all they have to make do with? ::)
What you say is a discriminatory race based notion.... and not workable.


Addressed above; as long as a black 'gap' exists, we ARE dealing with a "race-based notion".


Quote:
It's nothing more than symbolic appeasement based on race.


Refuted above - if no black gap existed, there would be no need for a voice, symbolic or not. 

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 10th, 2022 at 10:43am

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 9:58am:
'dividie' doesn't 'refute' anything - he simply offers a rhetorical different opinion - that is not refuting - it is merely offering an opinion.

A few here make that mistake, some deliberately, since they are both uneducated and essentially childish in their approach to life and discussion.

Their 'refutation' is like that Monty Python sketch...

"No it's not..."


refuted in #104. The BLACK gap is real, not opinion.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 10th, 2022 at 10:44am
..

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by freediver on Sep 10th, 2022 at 11:41am

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 10:43am:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 9:58am:
'dividie' doesn't 'refute' anything - he simply offers a rhetorical different opinion - that is not refuting - it is merely offering an opinion.

A few here make that mistake, some deliberately, since they are both uneducated and essentially childish in their approach to life and discussion.

Their 'refutation' is like that Monty Python sketch...

"No it's not..."


refuted in #104. The BLACK gap is real, not opinion.


We are not having a referendum on whether the gap exists TGD. You still have to think for yourself. Try it.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 10th, 2022 at 12:57pm

freediver wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 11:41am:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 10:43am:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 9:58am:
'dividie' doesn't 'refute' anything - he simply offers a rhetorical different opinion - that is not refuting - it is merely offering an opinion.

A few here make that mistake, some deliberately, since they are both uneducated and essentially childish in their approach to life and discussion.

Their 'refutation' is like that Monty Python sketch...

"No it's not..."


refuted in #104. The BLACK gap is real, not opinion.


We are not having a referendum on whether the gap exists TGD. You still have to think for yourself. Try it.


We ARE having a referendum owing to the nation's  disgraceful black gap. If the race-based gap didn't exist, we wouldn't be having a referndum for a black voice.

Of course you ignored #104 which highlighted the fact.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by freediver on Sep 10th, 2022 at 1:55pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 12:57pm:

freediver wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 11:41am:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 10:43am:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 9:58am:
'dividie' doesn't 'refute' anything - he simply offers a rhetorical different opinion - that is not refuting - it is merely offering an opinion.

A few here make that mistake, some deliberately, since they are both uneducated and essentially childish in their approach to life and discussion.

Their 'refutation' is like that Monty Python sketch...

"No it's not..."


refuted in #104. The BLACK gap is real, not opinion.


We are not having a referendum on whether the gap exists TGD. You still have to think for yourself. Try it.


We ARE having a referendum owing to the nation's  disgraceful black gap. If the race-based gap didn't exist, we wouldn't be having a referndum for a black voice.

Of course you ignored #104 which highlighted the fact.


Probably, but that wouldn't actually refute what anyone else is saying. You still have to think for yourself. Try it.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 10th, 2022 at 2:06pm

freediver wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 1:55pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 12:57pm:

freediver wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 11:41am:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 10:43am:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 9:58am:
'dividie' doesn't 'refute' anything - he simply offers a rhetorical different opinion - that is not refuting - it is merely offering an opinion.

A few here make that mistake, some deliberately, since they are both uneducated and essentially childish in their approach to life and discussion.

Their 'refutation' is like that Monty Python sketch...

"No it's not..."


refuted in #104. The BLACK gap is real, not opinion.


We are not having a referendum on whether the gap exists TGD. You still have to think for yourself. Try it.


We ARE having a referendum owing to the nation's  disgraceful black gap. If the race-based gap didn't exist, we wouldn't be having a referndum for a black voice.

Of course you ignored #104 which highlighted the fact.


Probably, but that wouldn't actually refute what anyone else is saying. You still have to think for yourself. Try it.


You asked for it - frauddiver -

Say what "others are saying", and what I must refute, and why " it wouldn't refute what others are saying".

Go on, now it's your chance  to pin me down on your terms of the debate, frauddiver, while you refuse to address #104.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by freediver on Sep 10th, 2022 at 2:13pm
You don't have to refute anything. I just wanted you to realise that actually refuting what someone else says is not as simple as offering a tangentially relevant opinion that you think they might disagree with.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 10th, 2022 at 2:40pm

freediver wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 2:13pm:
You don't have to refute anything. I just wanted you to realise that actually refuting what someone else says is not as simple as offering a tangentially relevant opinion that you think they might disagree with.


Addressed in #104. Refutation with facts makes it simple. ...the race-based gap exists,  how we eradicate it is up for debate.

Grapps and Gnads reckon 'personal responsibility' is the beginning and end of the matter, so we just have to accept living with the gap.

Losers.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by freediver on Sep 10th, 2022 at 2:48pm

Quote:
Addressed in #104.


Ah. You win because you have won.

Perhaps it is best if you don't try to refute anything.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 10th, 2022 at 2:53pm

freediver wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 2:48pm:

Quote:
Addressed in #104.


Ah. You win because you have won.

Perhaps it is best if you don't try to refute anything.


That's not debate; you need to quote what I said, and then refute it...

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by freediver on Sep 10th, 2022 at 4:15pm
Would you agree that in order to refute what someone is saying, you must first understand what they are saying?

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 10th, 2022 at 8:56pm

freediver wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 4:15pm:
Would you agree that in order to refute what someone is saying, you must first understand what they are saying?


No, I'm saying you are a fraud, who prefers to divert when he can't/won't debate.

Frauddiver, quote from #104 (anything will do), and then attempt to refute it, or confirm your obviously fraudulent nature.   

Oh..and point out where/how I "haven't understood what someone was saying"....

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by freediver on Sep 10th, 2022 at 9:23pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 8:56pm:

freediver wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 4:15pm:
Would you agree that in order to refute what someone is saying, you must first understand what they are saying?


No


Yeah, I didn't think you would.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by John Smith on Sep 10th, 2022 at 9:27pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 8:56pm:
No, I'm saying you are a fraud, who prefers to divert when he can't/won't debate.



That pretty much sums FD up.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 10th, 2022 at 9:43pm

freediver wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 9:23pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 8:56pm:

freediver wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 4:15pm:
Would you agree that in order to refute what someone is saying, you must first understand what they are saying?


No


Yeah, I didn't think you would.


I see John Smith has you sorted...

so.... last chance:

Frauddiver, quote from #104 (anything will do), and then attempt to refute it, or confirm your obviously fraudulent nature.   

Oh..and point out where/how I "haven't understood what someone was saying"..

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by freediver on Sep 10th, 2022 at 9:47pm
It is meaningless gibberish. Why would I try to refute what you say? You would have to actually say something first.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Boris on Sep 11th, 2022 at 8:40am
Here is a question for the Referendum:

How do you feel about a people who rape murder and eat children?

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Marla on Sep 11th, 2022 at 8:43am
Grow a pair, Australia. Legalize weed.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Xavier on Sep 11th, 2022 at 8:45am
*sprays Marla with Round-Up

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 11th, 2022 at 11:38am
This 'black gap' is irrelevant to a referendum to alter the constitution to create a separate body for one group = racism, especially when there are already countless bodies that do exactly that.

You have already agreed that any 'voice' would not help any of those problems.

You need to separate your emotion from reality and consider the referendum idea in isolation on its merits - not on some hankey-waving tear jerking idea of somehow elevating the cheers.

Stick to the referendum and stop muddying the waters with stories of how badly done Jackie-Jackie is out there with his aluminium boat and fishing gear and his dole money.... where he CHOOSES to be... at your expense.

Sandy beaches - drinking rum every night.....

They're acknowledged as having been here first in the long ago past - now get 'em out to work... or they can WISP all their lives.  It's 2022, not 1787 and they are a small minority.

One Law For All - All Laws For One!!

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 11th, 2022 at 4:25pm

freediver wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 9:47pm:
It is meaningless gibberish. Why would I try to refute what you say? You would have to actually say something first.


Your contention I haven't said anything is false.

I'll take #104 slowly for you, one line at a time:

"The point is blacks need a 'consensus voice' to advise parliament, so long as the gap exists".

You can't refute it?

I see Grapps has had a go, lets see what he has to say..

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by freediver on Sep 11th, 2022 at 4:27pm
;D

So whether Australian political parties can cater for you depends on the colour of your skin. Is this the "fact" you are asking me to refute?

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by freediver on Sep 11th, 2022 at 4:28pm
Why did you edit out of your post the bit about the political parties not catering to people of certain skin colours?

You almost said something, but then you got scared of your own words. You're not exactly the bravest little pink, are you?

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 11th, 2022 at 4:42pm

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 11th, 2022 at 11:38am:
This 'black gap' is irrelevant to a referendum to alter the constitution to create a separate body for one group = racism, especially when there are already countless bodies that do exactly that.


Obviously the countless bodies are failing to close the black gap which is why we need to try somethibg else (in short, bring back CDEP-type programs). But the point is we are talking about a BLACK gap, so of course the voice will be race based. 


Quote:
You have already agreed that any 'voice' would not help any of those problems.


Yes, but on further reflection  I have modified my stance; the search for a consensus voice among blacks themselves might be useful for getting blacks to face aspects of the problem they are not facing at present.   


Quote:
You need to separate your emotion from reality and consider the referendum idea in isolation on its merits - not on some hankey-waving tear jerking idea of somehow elevating the cheers.


I think if it's made clear the black - consensus - voice will have an advisory role only, you can indeed separate emotion and reality.  (The lack of black consensus itself will be informative...)


Quote:
One Law For All - All Laws For One!!


When there is no race-based gap.....

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 11th, 2022 at 5:07pm

freediver wrote on Sep 11th, 2022 at 4:27pm:
;D

So whether Australian political parties can cater for you depends on the colour of your skin. Is this the "fact" you are asking me to refute?


Yes. Obviously Oz political parties are failing to eradicate the (black) gap.


Quote:
Why did you edit out of your post the bit about the political parties not catering to people of certain skin colours?


Because you apparently cannot cope with more than one idea at a time....the 2nd point being:

"whereas non-blacks are catered for by centre Left and centre Right parties who fight it out over disadvantage within the non-black community".

Interestingly, there is also a gap - between rich and poor - in the non-black community, but the political parties DO address ('fight it out') this issue, meaning the political contest is NOT race-based , cf the black gap which IS race based; eg non blacks have a ten-year longer life span than blacks...aka 'the gap'.


Quote:
Why did you edit out of your post the bit about the political parties not catering to people of certain skin colours?


Explained above, your capacity to consider more than one idea at a time is obviously severely challenged.

So after I took it one line at a time, lo and behold you have joined the debate...


Quote:
You almost said something, but then you got scared of your own words. You're not exactly the bravest little pink, are you?


Addressed ...and refuted above.



Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by random on Sep 11th, 2022 at 6:54pm

freediver wrote on Sep 11th, 2022 at 4:28pm:
Why did you edit out of your post the bit about the political parties not catering to people of certain skin colours?

You almost said something, but then you got scared of your own words. You're not exactly the bravest little pink, are you?


Like I said, trolling shills end nearly every post with a ?.

Count em.


Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by random on Sep 11th, 2022 at 6:55pm

freediver wrote on Sep 11th, 2022 at 4:27pm:
;D

So whether Australian political parties can cater for you depends on the colour of your skin. Is this the "fact" you are asking me to refute?


Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 11th, 2022 at 8:36pm
Why would that be?

Please Explain? 

Why is it 'troll schills' who end with a question? 

What makes you think that?

Is it not more likely and most likely that they raise questions so as to make you think about the subject matter?

Is this not instead a way of your getting out from under the terrible burden of actually answering to the issue?


Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by AusGeoff on Sep 11th, 2022 at 8:50pm
In 2015–2017, life expectancy at birth was 71.6 years for Indigenous males
and 75.6 years for Indigenous females. In comparison, the non-Indigenous
life expectancy at birth was 80.2 years for males and 83.4 years for females.
This is a gap of 8.6 years for males and 7.8 years for females.

Life expectancy is an overarching target, which is dependent not only on health,
but the social determinants (such as education, employment status, housing
and income). Social determinants are estimated to be responsible for at least
34% of the health gap between Indigenous and non‑Indigenous Australians.
Behavioural risk factors, such as smoking, obesity, alcohol use and diet,
accounted for around 19% of that gap.

Over the period 2006 to 2018, there was an improvement of almost 10% in
Indigenous age‑standardised mortality rates. However, non‑Indigenous mortality
rates improved at a similar rate, so the gap has not narrowed.

Australian Health Ministers' Advisory Council (AHMAC), Closing The Gap Report 2020.


Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Xavier on Sep 11th, 2022 at 9:01pm
They lived for 40,000 to 100,000+ years.
Europeans have only been alive for just 6,000 years.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by freediver on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:47am

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 11th, 2022 at 8:36pm:
Why would that be?

Please Explain? 

Why is it 'troll schills' who end with a question? 

What makes you think that?

Is it not more likely and most likely that they raise questions so as to make you think about the subject matter?

Is this not instead a way of your getting out from under the terrible burden of actually answering to the issue?


Random doesn't like questions. He likes memes. They require less thought.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:43am

Jasin wrote on Sep 11th, 2022 at 9:01pm:
They lived for 40,000 to 100,000+ years.
Europeans have only been alive for just 6,000 years.


Rubbish .... everyone here is the descendant of millions of years of evolution....  grow a life .... it's good for you.

Aborigines were never a contiguous group, so Europeans far outweigh them when it comes to the (gasps) Identity Stakes.....

"Hi - I'm a Ngunnawalla!"

"What's that mean?"

"The six of us down by the creek..... we're organising a resistance - you wanna come down and listen in?  Women can't come - men's business, you know."

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:52am

AusGeoff wrote on Sep 11th, 2022 at 8:50pm:
In 2015–2017, life expectancy at birth was 71.6 years for Indigenous males
and 75.6 years for Indigenous females. In comparison, the non-Indigenous
life expectancy at birth was 80.2 years for males and 83.4 years for females.
This is a gap of 8.6 years for males and 7.8 years for females.

Life expectancy is an overarching target, which is dependent not only on health,
but the social determinants (such as education, employment status, housing
and income). Social determinants are estimated to be responsible for at least
34% of the health gap between Indigenous and non‑Indigenous Australians.
Behavioural risk factors, such as smoking, obesity, alcohol use and diet,
accounted for around 19% of that gap.

Over the period 2006 to 2018, there was an improvement of almost 10% in
Indigenous age‑standardised mortality rates. However, non‑Indigenous mortality
rates improved at a similar rate, so the gap has not narrowed.

Australian Health Ministers' Advisory Council (AHMAC), Closing The Gap Report 2020.


No gap at all - you get what your genes and your lifestyle give you.

How is their infant mortality rate and their woman murder rate compared to the rest?  We Wharteys have got a long way to catch up in both of those.

Being as how Indigenous men are less likely to die in prison than in their own communities, it appears the lifestyle and the food suit them better in prison.... maybe the great divide has a point about extreme government imposition amounting to Intervention™ and a New Invasion™ ... and maybe a few more New Stolen Generations™.

Slip 'em all into that Great Gulag up Cape York, provided by the Queenslund Government in its stupidity and cupidity... force 'em to a healthy lifestyle and into not killing one another ....no booze, no drugs, no petrol to sniff, no fast food.... just remove all the risk factors and force 'em into training and jobs ... and problem solved!!

Well, well - it irritates me to the core to see 'governments' paying dick-heads hundreds of thousands a year to come up with these utterly stupid comments without offering any genuine solutions - when the solutions are right there for the asking of the general public... you could ask the average person in a pub how to resolve many of these issues - but a government minister or a 'chief health officer' is only good for mumbling what sounds like meaningful words at huge expense.

What to you do with a chief health officer who stuffs up the Corona Princess and lets Covid loose on the land?

Give 'em a medal.....  FFS....

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:54am

freediver wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:47am:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 11th, 2022 at 8:36pm:
Why would that be?

Please Explain? 

Why is it 'troll schills' who end with a question? 

What makes you think that?

Is it not more likely and most likely that they raise questions so as to make you think about the subject matter?

Is this not instead a way of your getting out from under the terrible burden of actually answering to the issue?


Random doesn't like questions. He likes memes. They require less thought.


I was waiting for someone to note that I'd ended every sentence with a ? .....  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Xavier on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:56am

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:43am:

Jasin wrote on Sep 11th, 2022 at 9:01pm:
They lived for 40,000 to 100,000+ years.
Europeans have only been alive for just 6,000 years.


Rubbish .... everyone here is the descendant of millions of years of evolution....  grow a life .... it's good for you.

Aborigines were never a contiguous group, so Europeans far outweigh them when it comes to the (gasps) Identity Stakes.....

"Hi - I'm a Ngunnawalla!"

"What's that mean?"

"The six of us down by the creek..... we're organising a resistance - you wanna come down and listen in?  Women can't come - men's business, you know."


You whiteys inherited 'permanency' in Europe only 6,000 years ago after the last ice age.
From that - you whiteys are just a 'recent' offshoot from 'caucasoid' Middle-Easterner Brownies, Black 'caucasoid' Aryan Indians and even the Abos have Caucasoid in them.
All far older than Whiteys.

Yep - there was a world for 100,000 years of Sapien history, where there was NO WHITEYS AT ALL.  ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:08am

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 11th, 2022 at 8:36pm:
Why would that be?

Please Explain? 

Why is it 'troll schills' who end with a question? 

What makes you think that?

Is it not more likely and most likely that they raise questions so as to make you think about the subject matter?

Is this not instead a way of your getting out from under the terrible burden of actually answering to the issue?


Not in fraudiver's case..

Now you both need to acknowledge the usefulness of a consensus, black, race-based voice to advise parliament, while the black gap exists.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Xavier on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:14am
If you want to pass GO and collect $200
You've got to bend the knee
to the Aborigine.

;D :D

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Gnads on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:21am

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 10:39am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 9:50am:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 9:07am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 8:49am:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 8:32am:

freediver wrote on Sep 9th, 2022 at 9:55pm:
Both ideas seem to have the same problem - lack of detail. And both ideas lack detail because no-one likes what they see, if they ever get to see it.


see how conservatives fuss about the letter of the law;

a voice is just that, an advice from black communities to Parliament - which may or may not be taken; and removal of the UK monarch as head of state in Oz.   (The issue of electing an Oz head of state is minor, though people think their "freedom" is at stake)


Phark me hooray - they already have a voice & the mechanisms to be heard in Parliament ...


No they have c 15 separate voices (according to you) in Parliament, displaying the usual L-R divide.


Quote:
that's what 15 plus elected Aboriginal MPs and Senators are there for.......

how does this continually escape you?


Addressed above. A consensus voice as opposed to the 15 separate voices currently in Parliament.

[quote]They do not need a duplication or a non elected voice directly to PARLIAMENT.


The voice would represent a 'black party' (though without actually existing as a party in parliament), as the ALP represents the voice of the Oz centre left, for exmple.

[quote]It's a nonsense.


Refuted above.


Your refutation isn't worth squat.

Does everyone else get a consensus voice?[/quote]

The point is blacks need a 'consensus voice' to advise parliament, so long as the gap exists; whereas non-blacks are catered for, by centre Left and centre Right parties who fight it out over disadvantage within the non-black community.


Quote:
Or does the plethora of separate voices above the Aboriginal 15 ..... all they have to make do with? ::)
What you say is a discriminatory race based notion.... and not workable.


Addressed above; as long as a black 'gap' exists, we ARE dealing with a "race-based notion".


Quote:
It's nothing more than symbolic appeasement based on race.


Refuted above - if no black gap existed, there would be no need for a voice, symbolic or not. 
[/quote]


;D The fictitious gender pay gap .... now you're pedalling a "black gap" as a reason for the duplication of representation to Parliament.

everything you're barrowing here is race based bullshyte.   

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Gnads on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:22am

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 10:43am:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 9:58am:
'dividie' doesn't 'refute' anything - he simply offers a rhetorical different opinion - that is not refuting - it is merely offering an opinion.

A few here make that mistake, some deliberately, since they are both uneducated and essentially childish in their approach to life and discussion.

Their 'refutation' is like that Monty Python sketch...

"No it's not..."


refuted in #104. The BLACK gap is real, not opinion.



Rubbish ... is what it is.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Gnads on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:24am

Marla wrote on Sep 11th, 2022 at 8:43am:
Grow a pair, Australia. Legalize weed.


You've got plenty for everyone. ;D

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:49am

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:08am:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 11th, 2022 at 8:36pm:
Why would that be?

Please Explain? 

Why is it 'troll schills' who end with a question? 

What makes you think that?

Is it not more likely and most likely that they raise questions so as to make you think about the subject matter?

Is this not instead a way of your getting out from under the terrible burden of actually answering to the issue?


Not in fraudiver's case..

Now you both need to acknowledge the usefulness of a consensus, black, race-based voice to advise parliament, while the black gap exists.


No way, Jose` - they already have more representation than they need - what they need is the willingness to get out of 'living their way' or go that way exclusively without us, and take their chances.

I 'need' to acknowledge no such thing... is it a racist, Apartheidist lie from start to finish and has no beneficial outcomes ...

I'd like to see the one time in my life, as a 'White' - that I've been catered to.... FFS...

This country needs to stop right now in its tracks and get itself back on the rails....and the first step, as I told Albo pre-election - is to get away from the politics of division and the policies of exclusion.... clearly Albo is incapable of listening... I cannot reason with this man ....

You cannot, by definition, include one small group by excluding the majority.

Get over it.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 12th, 2022 at 11:00am

Gnads wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:21am:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 10:39am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 9:50am:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 9:07am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 8:49am:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 8:32am:

freediver wrote on Sep 9th, 2022 at 9:55pm:
Both ideas seem to have the same problem - lack of detail. And both ideas lack detail because no-one likes what they see, if they ever get to see it.


see how conservatives fuss about the letter of the law;

a voice is just that, an advice from black communities to Parliament - which may or may not be taken; and removal of the UK monarch as head of state in Oz.   (The issue of electing an Oz head of state is minor, though people think their "freedom" is at stake)


Phark me hooray - they already have a voice & the mechanisms to be heard in Parliament ...


No they have c 15 separate voices (according to you) in Parliament, displaying the usual L-R divide.


Quote:
that's what 15 plus elected Aboriginal MPs and Senators are there for.......

how does this continually escape you?


Addressed above. A consensus voice as opposed to the 15 separate voices currently in Parliament.

[quote]They do not need a duplication or a non elected voice directly to PARLIAMENT.


The voice would represent a 'black party' (though without actually existing as a party in parliament), as the ALP represents the voice of the Oz centre left, for exmple.

[quote]It's a nonsense.


Refuted above.


Your refutation isn't worth squat.

Does everyone else get a consensus voice?


The point is blacks need a 'consensus voice' to advise parliament, so long as the gap exists; whereas non-blacks are catered for, by centre Left and centre Right parties who fight it out over disadvantage within the non-black community.


Quote:
Or does the plethora of separate voices above the Aboriginal 15 ..... all they have to make do with? ::)
What you say is a discriminatory race based notion.... and not workable.


Addressed above; as long as a black 'gap' exists, we ARE dealing with a "race-based notion".


Quote:
It's nothing more than symbolic appeasement based on race.


Refuted above - if no black gap existed, there would be no need for a voice, symbolic or not. 
[/quote]


;D The fictitious gender pay gap .... [/quote]

Not ficticious, most women are employed in underpaid caring professions, hence "the gender pay gap", and all the flow-on effects: super, housing, poverty levels.


Quote:
now you're pedalling a "black gap" as a reason for the duplication of representation to Parliament.


Yes, a voice may help to  identify the nature of the problem which thus far have proved intractable.


Quote:
everything you're barrowing here is race based bullshyte.   


So long as a 'black gap' exists, necessary solutions ARE 'race-based'.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Kat on Sep 12th, 2022 at 11:13am

Gnads wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:21am:
;D The fictitious gender pay gap .... now you're pedalling a "black gap" as a reason for the duplication of representation to Parliament.

everything you're barrowing here is race based bullshyte.   


Well, no. It's anything but 'fictitious'.

It's not universal, by any means - I've worked with women in some of my jobs and we've
received the same wage for the same work.

But it DOES exist in some fields - mostly 'professional', for some reason.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 12th, 2022 at 11:42am
Look - you can lead a cheer to a public bar, but you can't force him to drink beer all night... he can only drink that beer if he chooses to do so, OK?

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 12th, 2022 at 11:44am

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:49am:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:08am:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 11th, 2022 at 8:36pm:
Why would that be?

Please Explain? 

Why is it 'troll schills' who end with a question? 

What makes you think that?

Is it not more likely and most likely that they raise questions so as to make you think about the subject matter?

Is this not instead a way of your getting out from under the terrible burden of actually answering to the issue?


Not in fraudiver's case..

Now you both need to acknowledge the usefulness of a consensus, black, race-based voice to advise parliament, while the black gap exists.


No way, Jose` - they already have more representation than they need - what they need is the willingness to get out of 'living their way' or go that way exclusively without us, and take their chances.


In any case we need to close the gap...which you of course deny even exists:

https://www.iwgia.org/en/news/4344-aboriginal-people-in-australia-the-most-imprisoned-people-on-earth.html

Aboriginal people in Australia: the most imprisoned people on Earth

HOW we close the gap is up for debate; but the idea of blacks reverting to the hunter gatherer culture in modern Oz is obviously absurd.

btw, blacks didn't display the social dysfunction  pre 1770s they are now experiencing...consider: why is that? 


Quote:
I 'need' to acknowledge no such thing... is it a racist, Apartheidist lie from start to finish and has no beneficial outcomes ...


Well, given you deny the black gap exists, we have this typical GIGO proposition from you.


Quote:
I'd like to see the one time in my life, as a 'White' - that I've been catered to.... FFS...


If you are 'working class', the ALP is 'here to help' (!...except the ALP has turned into a neoliberal toad, so you are abandoned..); if you are small business or wealthy, you are "catered to" by the Coalition.


Quote:
This country needs to stop right now in its tracks and get itself back on the rails....and the first step, as I told Albo pre-election - is to get away from the politics of division and the policies of exclusion.... clearly Albo is incapable of listening... I cannot reason with this man ....


I feel your pain...he rejected my copy of 'The Deficit Myth' which actually contains the key to allowing re-establishment and enlargement of the highly successful CDEP trashed by the neoliberal toad Howard


Quote:
You cannot, by definition, include one small group by excluding the majority.

Get over it.


An advisory - presumbly consensus -  black voice to parliament (existing outside parliamnet), which may  assist in closing the gap,  is NOT equivalent to  'including one small group by excluding the majority", because the proposed voice will exist outside parliament.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 12th, 2022 at 11:46am

Kat wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 11:13am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:21am:
;D The fictitious gender pay gap .... now you're pedalling a "black gap" as a reason for the duplication of representation to Parliament.

everything you're barrowing here is race based bullshyte.   


Well, no. It's anything but 'fictitious'.

It's not universal, by any means - I've worked with women in some of my jobs and we've
received the same wage for the same work.

But it DOES exist in some fields - mostly 'professional', for some reason.


Follow the arguments and the figures - they tell the whole story.

As long as people are paid what is required for the job - they cannot complain that they are suffering any 'wage gap' because they do a Lisa Wilkinson and proclaim that they are being treated badly for having negotiated only $1.8m as opposed to a bloke negotiating $2m for the same job...  paid journo rates and they'd be on maybe $2-3k a week.

NOWHERE is anyone legally paid less for the same job - and if you wish to look at sectors - women far outweigh men in earnings and super in the nursing business, for a start, and receive massive preference there as well.

Are you arguing for equal payment there across the board?

The figures real show that it is men who are paid an hourly rate less than women overall.  Next!

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 12th, 2022 at 11:49am

Kat wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 11:13am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:21am:
;D The fictitious gender pay gap .... now you're pedalling a "black gap" as a reason for the duplication of representation to Parliament.

everything you're barrowing here is race based bullshyte.   


Well, no. It's anything but 'fictitious'.

It's not universal, by any means - I've worked with women in some of my jobs and we've
received the same wage for the same work.

But it DOES exist in some fields - mostly 'professional', for some reason.


The feminized nature of the low-paid  caring professions (child care, health and age care) is also a factor in '"the gender pay gap" (ie men on average earn more than women).

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 12th, 2022 at 11:51am
"In any case we need to close the gap...which you of course deny even exists:"

Another ridiculous and presumptuous statement signifying your lack of connection with reality and your inability too distinguish between rhetoric and reality.

Nobody says there is no gap - the real issue is WHY there is and remains a gap despite billions of dollars and decades of effort.... when people CHOOSE to live a Gap - that is their personal choice and nobody else's.

As for Indigenous incarceration they just need to accept personal sovereignty and choose to not engage in criminal actions...

I've invited you before to get out there in the Outback and go around selling your ideas to the Cheers - see if you come back in one piece and an unchanged person.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Gnads on Sep 12th, 2022 at 12:56pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 11th, 2022 at 5:07pm:

freediver wrote on Sep 11th, 2022 at 4:27pm:
;D

So whether Australian political parties can cater for you depends on the colour of your skin. Is this the "fact" you are asking me to refute?


Yes. Obviously Oz political parties are failing to eradicate the (black) gap.


Quote:
Why did you edit out of your post the bit about the political parties not catering to people of certain skin colours?


Because you apparently cannot cope with more than one idea at a time....the 2nd point being:

"whereas non-blacks are catered for by centre Left and centre Right parties who fight it out over disadvantage within the non-black community".

Interestingly, there is also a gap - between rich and poor - in the non-black community, but the political parties DO address ('fight it out') this issue, meaning the political contest is NOT race-based , cf the black gap which IS race based; eg non blacks have a ten-year longer life span than blacks...aka 'the gap'.

[quote]Why did you edit out of your post the bit about the political parties not catering to people of certain skin colours?


Explained above, your capacity to consider more than one idea at a time is obviously severely challenged.

So after I took it one line at a time, lo and behold you have joined the debate...


Quote:
You almost said something, but then you got scared of your own words. You're not exactly the bravest little pink, are you?


Addressed ...and refuted above.


[/quote]


Absolute bullshye..... Bob Hawke made this statement 35 years ago ....

"By 1990, no Australian child will be living in poverty,"

the then-prime minister told Labor's election campaign launch on June 23, 1987.

So was Hawke only referring to non Indigenous children?

Or was he referring to all Australian children?

2 years ago the Australian Council of Social Service & the UNSW Sydney did a study that found out of 4.7million children 17.7% of all Australian children under 15 i.e. 774,000 of them are living in poverty. 

https://apo.org.au/node/276246

All Australian children ..... NO RACE GAP.

Of that 4.7 million children 5.9% or 278,000 are ATSI.

Not all of those ATSI children are living in poverty.

You see where the numbers are going?

So if you applied a similar % of the 17.7% "all" figure you'd have 49,000 ATSI children living in poverty.

The issue needs to be tackled nationally as a whole ..... not based on race.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Gnads on Sep 12th, 2022 at 1:01pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 11:00am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:21am:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 10:39am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 9:50am:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 9:07am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 8:49am:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 10th, 2022 at 8:32am:

freediver wrote on Sep 9th, 2022 at 9:55pm:
Both ideas seem to have the same problem - lack of detail. And both ideas lack detail because no-one likes what they see, if they ever get to see it.


see how conservatives fuss about the letter of the law;

a voice is just that, an advice from black communities to Parliament - which may or may not be taken; and removal of the UK monarch as head of state in Oz.   (The issue of electing an Oz head of state is minor, though people think their "freedom" is at stake)


Phark me hooray - they already have a voice & the mechanisms to be heard in Parliament ...


No they have c 15 separate voices (according to you) in Parliament, displaying the usual L-R divide.


Quote:
that's what 15 plus elected Aboriginal MPs and Senators are there for.......

how does this continually escape you?


Addressed above. A consensus voice as opposed to the 15 separate voices currently in Parliament.

[quote]They do not need a duplication or a non elected voice directly to PARLIAMENT.


The voice would represent a 'black party' (though without actually existing as a party in parliament), as the ALP represents the voice of the Oz centre left, for exmple.

[quote]It's a nonsense.


Refuted above.


Your refutation isn't worth squat.

Does everyone else get a consensus voice?


The point is blacks need a 'consensus voice' to advise parliament, so long as the gap exists; whereas non-blacks are catered for, by centre Left and centre Right parties who fight it out over disadvantage within the non-black community.

[quote]Or does the plethora of separate voices above the Aboriginal 15 ..... all they have to make do with? ::)
What you say is a discriminatory race based notion.... and not workable.


Addressed above; as long as a black 'gap' exists, we ARE dealing with a "race-based notion".


Quote:
It's nothing more than symbolic appeasement based on race.


Refuted above - if no black gap existed, there would be no need for a voice, symbolic or not. 
[/quote]


;D The fictitious gender pay gap .... [/quote]

Not ficticious, most women are employed in underpaid caring professions, hence "the gender pay gap", and all the flow-on effects: super, housing, poverty levels.


Quote:
now you're pedalling a "black gap" as a reason for the duplication of representation to Parliament.


Yes, a voice may help to  identify the nature of the problem which thus far have proved intractable.


Quote:
everything you're barrowing here is race based bullshyte.   


So long as a 'black gap' exists, necessary solutions ARE 'race-based'.
[/quote]


Here's where you're still wrong ..... they are not underpaid.

They are paid for hours worked.

What they may be is "under employed". Not enough hours.

There are many males in that sort of employment as well.

CASUAL/PART TIME & UNDER EMPLOYED.

It isn't under paid ... unless the employer is stooping to breaking the law.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Gnads on Sep 12th, 2022 at 1:04pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 11:44am:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:49am:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:08am:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 11th, 2022 at 8:36pm:
Why would that be?

Please Explain? 

Why is it 'troll schills' who end with a question? 

What makes you think that?

Is it not more likely and most likely that they raise questions so as to make you think about the subject matter?

Is this not instead a way of your getting out from under the terrible burden of actually answering to the issue?


Not in fraudiver's case..

Now you both need to acknowledge the usefulness of a consensus, black, race-based voice to advise parliament, while the black gap exists.


No way, Jose` - they already have more representation than they need - what they need is the willingness to get out of 'living their way' or go that way exclusively without us, and take their chances.


In any case we need to close the gap...which you of course deny even exists:

https://www.iwgia.org/en/news/4344-aboriginal-people-in-australia-the-most-imprisoned-people-on-earth.html

Aboriginal people in Australia: the most imprisoned people on Earth

HOW we close the gap is up for debate; but the idea of blacks reverting to the hunter gatherer culture in modern Oz is obviously absurd.

btw, blacks didn't display the social dysfunction  pre 1770s they are now experiencing...consider: why is that? 


Quote:
I 'need' to acknowledge no such thing... is it a racist, Apartheidist lie from start to finish and has no beneficial outcomes ...


Well, given you deny the black gap exists, we have this typical GIGO proposition from you.

[quote]I'd like to see the one time in my life, as a 'White' - that I've been catered to.... FFS...


If you are 'working class', the ALP is 'here to help' (!...except the ALP has turned into a neoliberal toad, so you are abandoned..); if you are small business or wealthy, you are "catered to" by the Coalition.


Quote:
This country needs to stop right now in its tracks and get itself back on the rails....and the first step, as I told Albo pre-election - is to get away from the politics of division and the policies of exclusion.... clearly Albo is incapable of listening... I cannot reason with this man ....


I feel your pain...he rejected my copy of 'The Deficit Myth' which actually contains the key to allowing re-establishment and enlargement of the highly successful CDEP trashed by the neoliberal toad Howard


Quote:
You cannot, by definition, include one small group by excluding the majority.

Get over it.


An advisory - presumbly consensus -  black voice to parliament (existing outside parliamnet), which may  assist in closing the gap,  is NOT equivalent to  'including one small group by excluding the majority", because the proposed voice will exist outside parliament.
[/quote]

more Deadly Choices ey?  ;D

Stop being a patronising excuse maker.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 12th, 2022 at 1:11pm

Gnads wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 1:01pm:
Here's where you're still wrong ..... they are not underpaid.


Yes they are, that's why age care workers are leaving in droves. 


Quote:
They are paid for hours worked.


..and full time pay is inadequate, for the skills required. 


Quote:
What they may be is "under employed". Not enough hours.
 

That too.....


Quote:
There are many males in that sort of employment as well.


(guick google):

"Male workers currently account for 13.0% of the residential and 11.2% of the community aged care workforces".28 Feb 2019


Quote:
CASUAL/PART TIME & UNDER EMPLOYED.

It isn't under paid ... unless the employer is stooping to breaking the law.


Involuntary underemployment is another topic; low full-time wages in the caring professions is the major cause of the "gender pay gap" i

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Boris on Sep 12th, 2022 at 1:24pm
Imprisoned because of crimes committed

They just need to stop breaking the laws

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 12th, 2022 at 1:28pm

Gnads wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 1:04pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 11:44am:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:49am:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:08am:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 11th, 2022 at 8:36pm:
Why would that be?

Please Explain? 

Why is it 'troll schills' who end with a question? 

What makes you think that?

Is it not more likely and most likely that they raise questions so as to make you think about the subject matter?

Is this not instead a way of your getting out from under the terrible burden of actually answering to the issue?


Not in fraudiver's case..

Now you both need to acknowledge the usefulness of a consensus, black, race-based voice to advise parliament, while the black gap exists.


No way, Jose` - they already have more representation than they need - what they need is the willingness to get out of 'living their way' or go that way exclusively without us, and take their chances.


In any case we need to close the gap...which you of course deny even exists:

https://www.iwgia.org/en/news/4344-aboriginal-people-in-australia-the-most-imprisoned-people-on-earth.html

Aboriginal people in Australia: the most imprisoned people on Earth

HOW we close the gap is up for debate; but the idea of blacks reverting to the hunter gatherer culture in modern Oz is obviously absurd.

btw, blacks didn't display the social dysfunction  pre 1770s they are now experiencing...consider: why is that? 


Quote:
I 'need' to acknowledge no such thing... is it a racist, Apartheidist lie from start to finish and has no beneficial outcomes ...


Well, given you deny the black gap exists, we have this typical GIGO proposition from you.

[quote]I'd like to see the one time in my life, as a 'White' - that I've been catered to.... FFS...


If you are 'working class', the ALP is 'here to help' (!...except the ALP has turned into a neoliberal toad, so you are abandoned..); if you are small business or wealthy, you are "catered to" by the Coalition.

[quote]This country needs to stop right now in its tracks and get itself back on the rails....and the first step, as I told Albo pre-election - is to get away from the politics of division and the policies of exclusion.... clearly Albo is incapable of listening... I cannot reason with this man ....


I feel your pain...he rejected my copy of 'The Deficit Myth' which actually contains the key to allowing re-establishment and enlargement of the highly successful CDEP trashed by the neoliberal toad Howard


Quote:
You cannot, by definition, include one small group by excluding the majority.

Get over it.


An advisory - presumbly consensus -  black voice to parliament (existing outside parliamnet), which may  assist in closing the gap,  is NOT equivalent to  'including one small group by excluding the majority", because the proposed voice will exist outside parliament.
[/quote]

more Deadly Choices ey?  ;D[/quote]

Not "choices", an advisory voice (outside Parliament) arrived at by consensus.   


Quote:
Stop being a patronising excuse maker.


Action, not "excuse making" is required to  close the gap.  You need to follow your own advice, and stop making excuses for NOT closing the gap.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Gnads on Sep 12th, 2022 at 1:54pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 11:49am:

Kat wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 11:13am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:21am:
;D The fictitious gender pay gap .... now you're pedalling a "black gap" as a reason for the duplication of representation to Parliament.

everything you're barrowing here is race based bullshyte.   


Well, no. It's anything but 'fictitious'.

It's not universal, by any means - I've worked with women in some of my jobs and we've
received the same wage for the same work.

But it DOES exist in some fields - mostly 'professional', for some reason.


The feminized nature of the low-paid  caring professions (child care, health and age care) is also a factor in '"the gender pay gap" (ie men on average earn more than women).


That's an oversimplified generality.

Men on average earn more than women?

Doing what?

All you are trying to do is compare apples to rockmelons.

A man doing the same job would be paid the same.


You're like this journo - who had rings run around her with logic, composure & professionalism.

https://youtu.be/aMcjxSThD54

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Gnads on Sep 12th, 2022 at 1:58pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 1:11pm:

Gnads wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 1:01pm:
Here's where you're still wrong ..... they are not underpaid.


Yes they are, that's why age care workers are leaving in droves. 


Quote:
They are paid for hours worked.


..and full time pay is inadequate, for the skills required. 

[quote]What they may be is "under employed". Not enough hours.
 

That too.....


Quote:
There are many males in that sort of employment as well.


(guick google):

"Male workers currently account for 13.0% of the residential and 11.2% of the community aged care workforces".28 Feb 2019


Quote:
CASUAL/PART TIME & UNDER EMPLOYED.

It isn't under paid ... unless the employer is stooping to breaking the law.


Involuntary underemployment is another topic; low full-time wages in the caring professions is the major cause of the "gender pay gap" i
[/quote]


No ... they are not getting under paid. They are leaving because they aren't getting enough hours & they are being expected to do the work of 2 or more people because of staff shortages.

They are low paid jobs but they are not underpaid.

You're still wrong - because if you're a male working in one of those jobs in Child or Aged Care ... and there are some ....

they get the same low salary/ rate of pay.

To say different is lying.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 12th, 2022 at 4:08pm

Gnads wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 1:54pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 11:49am:

Kat wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 11:13am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:21am:
;D The fictitious gender pay gap .... now you're pedalling a "black gap" as a reason for the duplication of representation to Parliament.

everything you're barrowing here is race based bullshyte.   


Well, no. It's anything but 'fictitious'.

It's not universal, by any means - I've worked with women in some of my jobs and we've
received the same wage for the same work.

But it DOES exist in some fields - mostly 'professional', for some reason.


The feminized nature of the low-paid  caring professions (child care, health and age care) is also a factor in '"the gender pay gap" (ie men on average earn more than women).


That's an oversimplified generality.

Men on average earn more than women?

Doing what?


Trades like building/electrical  etc etc,  more highly paid than carers in age care etc.


Quote:
All you are trying to do is compare apples to rockmelons.


Refuted above.


Quote:
A man doing the same job would be paid the same.


Correct....but women on average do different work to men. 


Quote:
You're like this journo - who had rings run around her with logic, composure & professionalism.

https://youtu.be/aMcjxSThD54


Oh no..the awful Jordan Peterson, I'd make a fool of him in 10 minutes or less.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by MeisterEckhart on Sep 12th, 2022 at 4:12pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 4:08pm:
Oh no..the awful Jordan Peterson, I'd make a fool of him in 10 minutes or less.

No, you wouldn't.

Don't mistake Peterson's fractured personality for stupidity.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 12th, 2022 at 4:39pm
Peterson's very first stupidity:

journo: " women earn less than men"

peterson: "no they dont"

journo: "The pay gap is 9 percent less on average"

peterson:Yes but there are multiple reasons for that..."

So he agreed there IS a pay gap..... contradicting his earlier statement....

Admittedly, we can see the female journo is oblivious to the disadvantages of bearing children, vis a vis full time careers, but Peterson is also confused by "multi varied analysis which shows the pay gap doesn't exist", when 50 % of the population - by gender -  are earning 9% less on average.   

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Captain Caveman on Sep 12th, 2022 at 4:50pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 4:08pm:

Gnads wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 1:54pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 11:49am:

Kat wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 11:13am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:21am:
;D The fictitious gender pay gap .... now you're pedalling a "black gap" as a reason for the duplication of representation to Parliament.

everything you're barrowing here is race based bullshyte.   


Well, no. It's anything but 'fictitious'.

It's not universal, by any means - I've worked with women in some of my jobs and we've
received the same wage for the same work.

But it DOES exist in some fields - mostly 'professional', for some reason.


The feminized nature of the low-paid  caring professions (child care, health and age care) is also a factor in '"the gender pay gap" (ie men on average earn more than women).


That's an oversimplified generality.

Men on average earn more than women?

Doing what?


Trades like building/electrical  etc etc,  more highly paid than carers in age care etc.


Quote:
All you are trying to do is compare apples to rockmelons.


Refuted above.

[quote]A man doing the same job would be paid the same.


Correct....but women on average do different work to men. 


Quote:
You're like this journo - who had rings run around her with logic, composure & professionalism.

https://youtu.be/aMcjxSThD54


Oh no..the awful Jordan Peterson, I'd make a fool of him in 10 minutes or less.
[/quote]




Bwahahahahahaha.

So out of everyone that's tried, you think you can....... and you're telling an internet forum.
How come you're not leading one of these crazy terrorist lefty groups who are trying oh so desperately to "make a fool of him" .
Even news anchors get left high and dry.
It's smacking hilarious.
And ya's label him far right, well your media does and you just parrot it.

Good luck
Hope to see you one day try and pull this off.



Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Xavier on Sep 12th, 2022 at 5:06pm
When nations, cultures and races place importance upon 'youth' - it generates a faster breeding practice of mass production population growth.
If you can't over-power your enemies, then just out-breed them.

These nations, cultures and races could be said to have "Not grown up" so to speak. Just breed without the responsibility to take responsibility. They become resentful of wealthier nations with better quality of life and they seek to sponge 'easy' of such neighbours. Etc, etc. You all know the score.

Peterson is right in "Growing Up" - but the most 'adult' male character possible is the one that has never experience sex and gives himself totally to the greater good of the people and thus inherits or creates a Position of Power and Privilege for his sacrifice.

So its a double edged sword.
Being a Man isn't just a universal standard - there is at least x8 variations of being a Man.
With advantages and disadvantages for each.

Another Black or White clip of absolutism.  ::)
Peterson is smart, but he's just replicating what's already known. Nothing really new.

Here's just x4 types of Males which are BETA's (ie: they serve the Alpha Females).
Gays
Yobbos
Wankers
Rednecks

These four could easily sum up the x4 Middle-Eastern Religions of
Zarathustrianism
Judaism
Christianity
Mohommedism


Grow Up?
Well there is also x8 Regions of the World and Dear Peterson: Which way should Men grow up as?

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by MeisterEckhart on Sep 12th, 2022 at 5:06pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 4:39pm:
Peterson's very first stupidity:

journo: " women earn less than men"

peterson: "no they dont"

journo: "The pay gap is 9 percent less on average"

peterson:Yes but there are multiple reasons for that..."

So he agreed there IS a pay gap..... contradicting his earlier statement....
 

That's not even close to the transcript.

Read it before you put words in his mouth.

https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/psychology/jordan-petersons-channel-4-interview-cathy-newman-transcript/

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Gnads on Sep 12th, 2022 at 5:51pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 4:08pm:

Gnads wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 1:54pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 11:49am:

Kat wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 11:13am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:21am:
;D The fictitious gender pay gap .... now you're pedalling a "black gap" as a reason for the duplication of representation to Parliament.

everything you're barrowing here is race based bullshyte.   


Well, no. It's anything but 'fictitious'.

It's not universal, by any means - I've worked with women in some of my jobs and we've
received the same wage for the same work.

But it DOES exist in some fields - mostly 'professional', for some reason.


The feminized nature of the low-paid  caring professions (child care, health and age care) is also a factor in '"the gender pay gap" (ie men on average earn more than women).


That's an oversimplified generality.

Men on average earn more than women?

Doing what?


Trades like building/electrical  etc etc,  more highly paid than carers in age care etc.


Quote:
All you are trying to do is compare apples to rockmelons.


Refuted above.

[quote]A man doing the same job would be paid the same.


Correct....but women on average do different work to men. 


Quote:
You're like this journo - who had rings run around her with logic, composure & professionalism.

https://youtu.be/aMcjxSThD54


Oh no..the awful Jordan Peterson, I'd make a fool of him in 10 minutes or less.
[/quote]


There's your answer right there.

And regardless of gender tradesmen & trades women, who do a 4 year apprenticeship and are proficient in their trade are always going to earn more than someone unskilled working in Aged Care or an Assistant in Childcare.

My sister in law was  an Early Childhood teacher at Govt & private Kindies & Preps. She also had 2 children during her career.

She was always well paid & before she retired was head of a  large Early Childhood unit in Toowoomba.

She had a generous salary & a large super when she finished.

The Gender Pay gap is a furphy & so is your racist "black Gap".

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Gnads on Sep 12th, 2022 at 5:55pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 4:08pm:

Gnads wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 1:54pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 11:49am:

Kat wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 11:13am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:21am:
;D The fictitious gender pay gap .... now you're pedalling a "black gap" as a reason for the duplication of representation to Parliament.

everything you're barrowing here is race based bullshyte.   


Well, no. It's anything but 'fictitious'.

It's not universal, by any means - I've worked with women in some of my jobs and we've
received the same wage for the same work.

But it DOES exist in some fields - mostly 'professional', for some reason.


The feminized nature of the low-paid  caring professions (child care, health and age care) is also a factor in '"the gender pay gap" (ie men on average earn more than women).


That's an oversimplified generality.

Men on average earn more than women?

Doing what?


Trades like building/electrical  etc etc,  more highly paid than carers in age care etc.


Quote:
All you are trying to do is compare apples to rockmelons.


Refuted above.

[quote]A man doing the same job would be paid the same.


Correct....but women on average do different work to men. 


Quote:
You're like this journo - who had rings run around her with logic, composure & professionalism.

https://youtu.be/aMcjxSThD54


Oh no..the awful Jordan Peterson, I'd make a fool of him in 10 minutes or less.
[/quote]

In your deluded lefty dreams. ::)

He'd eat you for breakfast

You wouldn't make a 5 min smoko let alone 10.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by mothra on Sep 12th, 2022 at 5:58pm

Gnads wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 5:51pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 4:08pm:

Gnads wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 1:54pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 11:49am:

Kat wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 11:13am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:21am:
;D The fictitious gender pay gap .... now you're pedalling a "black gap" as a reason for the duplication of representation to Parliament.

everything you're barrowing here is race based bullshyte.   


Well, no. It's anything but 'fictitious'.

It's not universal, by any means - I've worked with women in some of my jobs and we've
received the same wage for the same work.

But it DOES exist in some fields - mostly 'professional', for some reason.


The feminized nature of the low-paid  caring professions (child care, health and age care) is also a factor in '"the gender pay gap" (ie men on average earn more than women).


That's an oversimplified generality.

Men on average earn more than women?

Doing what?


Trades like building/electrical  etc etc,  more highly paid than carers in age care etc.


Quote:
All you are trying to do is compare apples to rockmelons.


Refuted above.

[quote]A man doing the same job would be paid the same.


Correct....but women on average do different work to men. 

[quote]You're like this journo - who had rings run around her with logic, composure & professionalism.

https://youtu.be/aMcjxSThD54


Oh no..the awful Jordan Peterson, I'd make a fool of him in 10 minutes or less.
[/quote]


There's your answer right there.

And regardless of gender tradesmen & trades women, who do a 4 year apprenticeship and are proficient in their trade are always going to earn more than someone unskilled working in Aged Care or an Assistant in Childcare.

My sister in law was  an Early Childhood teacher at Govt & private Kindies & Preps. She also had 2 children during her career.

She was always well paid & before she retired was head of a  large Early Childhood unit in Toowoomba.

She had a generous salary & a large super when she finished.

The Gender Pay gap is a furphy & so is your racist "black Gap".[/quote]

Yet even the obnoxious Peterson admits in the link you shared and claimed to have watched, that the pay gap is a real thing. He just claims that it is multifaceted.

In true Peterson style, he thinks he's being cleverer than everyone else when he says this ... the fact is of course that feminists have been saying the exact same thing for generations.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by mothra on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:00pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 5:06pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 4:39pm:
Peterson's very first stupidity:

journo: " women earn less than men"

peterson: "no they dont"

journo: "The pay gap is 9 percent less on average"

peterson:Yes but there are multiple reasons for that..."

So he agreed there IS a pay gap..... contradicting his earlier statement....
 

That's not even close to the transcript.

Read it before you put words in his mouth.

https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/psychology/jordan-petersons-channel-4-interview-cathy-newman-transcript/



Really?

Newman: But that’s not true, is it? That 9 percent pay gap, that’s a gap between median hourly earnings between men and women. That exists.

Peterson: Yes. But there’s multiple reasons for that. One of them is gender, but that’s not the only reason.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Gnads on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:01pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 4:39pm:
Peterson's very first stupidity:

journo: " women earn less than men"

peterson: "no they dont"

journo: "The pay gap is 9 percent less on average"

peterson:Yes but there are multiple reasons for that..."

So he agreed there IS a pay gap..... contradicting his earlier statement....

Admittedly, we can see the female journo is oblivious to the disadvantages of bearing children, vis a vis full time careers, but Peterson is also confused by "multi varied analysis which shows the pay gap doesn't exist", when 50 % of the population - by gender -  are earning 9% less on average.   



You' a stupid as the female journo ... you don't listen.

He didn't contradict himself & he explained his point .... which was reasons for why women may earn less but they don't get paid less.

It was like her harping on about equality & he having to ask whether she meant equality of outcome which he explained was not a good or fair outcome.

It's like you thinking that women in aged care or child care should get paid as much as electricians, plumbers, builders etc.

Its a pharken nonsense.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Gnads on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:03pm

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:00pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 5:06pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 4:39pm:
Peterson's very first stupidity:

journo: " women earn less than men"

peterson: "no they dont"

journo: "The pay gap is 9 percent less on average"

peterson:Yes but there are multiple reasons for that..."

So he agreed there IS a pay gap..... contradicting his earlier statement....
 

That's not even close to the transcript.

Read it before you put words in his mouth.

https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/psychology/jordan-petersons-channel-4-interview-cathy-newman-transcript/



Really?

Newman: But that’s not true, is it? That 9 percent pay gap, that’s a gap between median hourly earnings between men and women. That exists.

Peterson: Yes. But there’s multiple reasons for that. One of them is gender, but that’s not the only reason.



So you want to list all the other reasons there's a difference in earnings?

Seems like TGD you don't listen either.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by mothra on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:09pm

Gnads wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:03pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:00pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 5:06pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 4:39pm:
Peterson's very first stupidity:

journo: " women earn less than men"

peterson: "no they dont"

journo: "The pay gap is 9 percent less on average"

peterson:Yes but there are multiple reasons for that..."

So he agreed there IS a pay gap..... contradicting his earlier statement....
 

That's not even close to the transcript.

Read it before you put words in his mouth.

https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/psychology/jordan-petersons-channel-4-interview-cathy-newman-transcript/



Really?

Newman: But that’s not true, is it? That 9 percent pay gap, that’s a gap between median hourly earnings between men and women. That exists.

Peterson: Yes. But there’s multiple reasons for that. One of them is gender, but that’s not the only reason.



So you want to list all the other reasons there's a difference in earnings?

Seems like TGD you don't listen either.



No i didn't listen. Peterson irritates me immensely. I read the transcript. The interviewer was an idiot, agreed.

But Peterson said nothing the feminists he derides haven't been saying for generations. He just writes it off as excuses whereas feminists are advocating for change for equality.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Gnads on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:14pm

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 5:58pm:

Gnads wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 5:51pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 4:08pm:

Gnads wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 1:54pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 11:49am:

Kat wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 11:13am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:21am:
;D The fictitious gender pay gap .... now you're pedalling a "black gap" as a reason for the duplication of representation to Parliament.

everything you're barrowing here is race based bullshyte.   


Well, no. It's anything but 'fictitious'.

It's not universal, by any means - I've worked with women in some of my jobs and we've
received the same wage for the same work.

But it DOES exist in some fields - mostly 'professional', for some reason.


The feminized nature of the low-paid  caring professions (child care, health and age care) is also a factor in '"the gender pay gap" (ie men on average earn more than women).


That's an oversimplified generality.

Men on average earn more than women?

Doing what?


Trades like building/electrical  etc etc,  more highly paid than carers in age care etc.


Quote:
All you are trying to do is compare apples to rockmelons.


Refuted above.

[quote]A man doing the same job would be paid the same.


Correct....but women on average do different work to men. 

[quote]You're like this journo - who had rings run around her with logic, composure & professionalism.

https://youtu.be/aMcjxSThD54


Oh no..the awful Jordan Peterson, I'd make a fool of him in 10 minutes or less.



There's your answer right there.

And regardless of gender tradesmen & trades women, who do a 4 year apprenticeship and are proficient in their trade are always going to earn more than someone unskilled working in Aged Care or an Assistant in Childcare.

My sister in law was  an Early Childhood teacher at Govt & private Kindies & Preps. She also had 2 children during her career.

She was always well paid & before she retired was head of a  large Early Childhood unit in Toowoomba.

She had a generous salary & a large super when she finished.

The Gender Pay gap is a furphy & so is your racist "black Gap".[/quote]

Yet even the obnoxious Peterson admits in the link you shared and claimed to have watched, that the pay gap is a real thing. He just claims that it is multifaceted.

In true Peterson style, he thinks he's being cleverer than everyone else when he says this ... the fact is of course that feminists have been saying the exact same thing for generations.
[/quote]


His calm & considered style is what annoys leftist ideologues like you & lefty journalists like Newman.

You want him to be angry & abusive so play the oppressive white male patriarchy card.

Yes your lefty feminists were parroting the same mantra & Petersen explained to Newman that they were wrong just as she was ...... and you are.

Like he said, he chooses his words very very carefully .....

And he has people like you for breakfast on a regular basis.

That interview had to be the worst Newman has ever done and I bet she looks back on that & cringes.

Ahhhhhhhh gotcha! He certainly did ..... and she admitted it.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by mothra on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:15pm
Irrational rant ignored.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Gnads on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:20pm

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:09pm:

Gnads wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:03pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:00pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 5:06pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 4:39pm:
Peterson's very first stupidity:

journo: " women earn less than men"

peterson: "no they dont"

journo: "The pay gap is 9 percent less on average"

peterson:Yes but there are multiple reasons for that..."

So he agreed there IS a pay gap..... contradicting his earlier statement....
 

That's not even close to the transcript.

Read it before you put words in his mouth.

https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/psychology/jordan-petersons-channel-4-interview-cathy-newman-transcript/



Really?

Newman: But that’s not true, is it? That 9 percent pay gap, that’s a gap between median hourly earnings between men and women. That exists.

Peterson: Yes. But there’s multiple reasons for that. One of them is gender, but that’s not the only reason.



So you want to list all the other reasons there's a difference in earnings?

Seems like TGD you don't listen either.



No i didn't listen. Peterson irritates me immensely. I read the transcript. The interviewer was an idiot, agreed.

But Peterson said nothing the feminists he derides haven't been saying for generations. He just writes it off as excuses whereas feminists are advocating for change for equality.


As he said - define equality - or are you talking about "equality of outcome?".

And he explained why that was no good.

If you're so intelligent you shouldn't need it explained that it's no good either.

I know he irritates you immensely .... it's because he's smarter than you & better at discussing & explaining a contrary view of issues that you parrot like decades of radical feminist dogma.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Gnads on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:21pm

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:15pm:
Irrational rant ignored.



;D like your bs should always be ignored

You calling anyone irrational is the ultimate hypocrisy

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by mothra on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:25pm

Gnads wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:20pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:09pm:

Gnads wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:03pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:00pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 5:06pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 4:39pm:
Peterson's very first stupidity:

journo: " women earn less than men"

peterson: "no they dont"

journo: "The pay gap is 9 percent less on average"

peterson:Yes but there are multiple reasons for that..."

So he agreed there IS a pay gap..... contradicting his earlier statement....
 

That's not even close to the transcript.

Read it before you put words in his mouth.

https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/psychology/jordan-petersons-channel-4-interview-cathy-newman-transcript/



Really?

Newman: But that’s not true, is it? That 9 percent pay gap, that’s a gap between median hourly earnings between men and women. That exists.

Peterson: Yes. But there’s multiple reasons for that. One of them is gender, but that’s not the only reason.



So you want to list all the other reasons there's a difference in earnings?

Seems like TGD you don't listen either.



No i didn't listen. Peterson irritates me immensely. I read the transcript. The interviewer was an idiot, agreed.

But Peterson said nothing the feminists he derides haven't been saying for generations. He just writes it off as excuses whereas feminists are advocating for change for equality.


As he said - define equality - or are you talking about "equality of outcome?".

And he explained why that was no good.

If you're so intelligent you shouldn't need it explained that it's no good either.

I know he irritates you immensely .... it's because he's smarter than you & better at discussing & explaining a contrary view of issues that you parrot like decades of radical feminist dogma.



I mean equality of worth. Can you get your head around that one?

And nobody thinks Peterson is as clever as he thinks he is. It's usually half-wits bamboozled by his word salads that are impressed by him. Anyone with any sense can see quite clearly that he's not actually saying anything at all most of th time and when he does, it's usually someone else's work.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Frank on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:53pm
"So you're saying..."   :D :D :D


Cathy Newman - and all activist journalists, etc - always want to drag everyone into the orbit of their own terms. She is relentlessly angling for the 'gotcha' and Petersen, having worked at universities all his adult life, sees through this pathetic ruse and refuses to accept Newman's constant paraphrasing of his words in her own terms.
He does explain his position very clearly - male/female differences in pay, life choices, etc are multi-variant equations and questions. She doesn't and only assumes that equality of outcome is an unchallengeable starting point in such a discussion. It evidently isn't but her mind is befogged by the ideology and she doesn't have the intelligence and candour to perceive that multi-variant aspect of this and most other such questions.

It is quite amusing to watch.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Frank on Sep 12th, 2022 at 7:07pm
The moment she pood her panties   ;D ;D ;D



Newman: Okay. You cited freedom of speech in that. Why should your right to freedom of speech trump a trans person’s right not to be offended?

Peterson: Because in order to be able to think, you have to risk being offensive. I mean, look at the conversation we’re having right now. You’re certainly willing to risk offending me in the pursuit of truth. Why should you have the right to do that? It’s been rather uncomfortable.

Newman: Well, I’m very glad I put you on this part…

Peterson: You get my point. You’re doing what you should do, which is digging a bit to see what the hell is going on. And that is what you should do. But you’re exercising your freedom of speech to certainly risk offending me, and that’s fine. More power to you, as far as I’m concerned.

Newman: So you haven’t sat there and… I’m just… I’m just trying to work that out… I mean… [long pause]

Peterson: Ha! Gotcha!

Newman: You have caught me. You have caught me. I’m trying to work that up through my head… yeah I took a while… it took a while…

Peterson: It did, it did, yeah.





She is just too thick and adamant about it.


Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by MeisterEckhart on Sep 12th, 2022 at 7:31pm

Jasin wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 5:06pm:
These four could easily sum up the x4 Middle-Eastern Religions of
Zarathustrianism
Judaism
Christianity
Mohommedism

Did you mean

Zoroastrianism
Judaism
Christianity
Islam

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by MeisterEckhart on Sep 12th, 2022 at 7:37pm

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:00pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 5:06pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 4:39pm:
Peterson's very first stupidity:

journo: " women earn less than men"

peterson: "no they dont"

journo: "The pay gap is 9 percent less on average"

peterson:Yes but there are multiple reasons for that..."

So he agreed there IS a pay gap..... contradicting his earlier statement....
 

That's not even close to the transcript.

Read it before you put words in his mouth.

https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/psychology/jordan-petersons-channel-4-interview-cathy-newman-transcript/



Really?

Newman: But that’s not true, is it? That 9 percent pay gap, that’s a gap between median hourly earnings between men and women. That exists.

Peterson: Yes. But there’s multiple reasons for that. One of them is gender, but that’s not the only reason.

Once more, in context, this time

Newman: So it seems to a lot of women that they still being dominated and excluded, to quote your words back to you.

Peterson: It does seem that way. But multivariate analysis of the pay gap indicate that it doesn’t exist.

Newman: But that’s not true, is it? That 9 percent pay gap, that’s a gap between median hourly earnings between men and women. That exists.

Peterson: Yes. But there’s multiple reasons for that. One of them is gender, but that’s not the only reason. If you’re a social scientist worth your salt, you never do a univariate analysis. You say women in aggregate are paid less than men. Okay. Well then we break its down by age; we break it down by occupation; we break it down by interest; we break it down by personality.


Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by mothra on Sep 12th, 2022 at 7:43pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 7:37pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:00pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 5:06pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 4:39pm:
Peterson's very first stupidity:

journo: " women earn less than men"

peterson: "no they dont"

journo: "The pay gap is 9 percent less on average"

peterson:Yes but there are multiple reasons for that..."

So he agreed there IS a pay gap..... contradicting his earlier statement....
 

That's not even close to the transcript.

Read it before you put words in his mouth.

https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/psychology/jordan-petersons-channel-4-interview-cathy-newman-transcript/



Really?

Newman: But that’s not true, is it? That 9 percent pay gap, that’s a gap between median hourly earnings between men and women. That exists.

Peterson: Yes. But there’s multiple reasons for that. One of them is gender, but that’s not the only reason.

Once more, in context, this time

Newman: So it seems to a lot of women that they still being dominated and excluded, to quote your words back to you.

Peterson: It does seem that way. But multivariate analysis of the pay gap indicate that it doesn’t exist.

Newman: But that’s not true, is it? That 9 percent pay gap, that’s a gap between median hourly earnings between men and women. That exists.

Peterson: Yes. But there’s multiple reasons for that. One of them is gender, but that’s not the only reason. If you’re a social scientist worth your salt, you never do a univariate analysis. You say women in aggregate are paid less than men. Okay. Well then we break its down by age; we break it down by occupation; we break it down by interest; we break it down by personality.



You mean the context in which he is pushed to contradict himself?

I thought i'd spare you all the humiliation of pointing that out.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by MeisterEckhart on Sep 12th, 2022 at 7:57pm

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 7:43pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 7:37pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:00pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 5:06pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 4:39pm:
Peterson's very first stupidity:

journo: " women earn less than men"

peterson: "no they dont"

journo: "The pay gap is 9 percent less on average"

peterson:Yes but there are multiple reasons for that..."

So he agreed there IS a pay gap..... contradicting his earlier statement....
 

That's not even close to the transcript.

Read it before you put words in his mouth.

https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/psychology/jordan-petersons-channel-4-interview-cathy-newman-transcript/



Really?

Newman: But that’s not true, is it? That 9 percent pay gap, that’s a gap between median hourly earnings between men and women. That exists.

Peterson: Yes. But there’s multiple reasons for that. One of them is gender, but that’s not the only reason.

Once more, in context, this time

Newman: So it seems to a lot of women that they still being dominated and excluded, to quote your words back to you.

Peterson: It does seem that way. But multivariate analysis of the pay gap indicate that it doesn’t exist.

Newman: But that’s not true, is it? That 9 percent pay gap, that’s a gap between median hourly earnings between men and women. That exists.

Peterson: Yes. But there’s multiple reasons for that. One of them is gender, but that’s not the only reason. If you’re a social scientist worth your salt, you never do a univariate analysis. You say women in aggregate are paid less than men. Okay. Well then we break its down by age; we break it down by occupation; we break it down by interest; we break it down by personality.



You mean the context in which he is pushed to contradict himself?

I thought i'd spare you all the humiliation of pointing that out.

No. The context of pay gap had been shifted by Newman from not only - there being a pay gap - to there being a pay gap and men cause it, all else being equal.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Frank on Sep 12th, 2022 at 7:59pm
Mothra Theresa - you are not up to it.  You are too thick and inarticulate. You never provide an actual agreement, only 'no-but' because you cannot.

Emoting and being smug and worked up about how righteous you think you are is NOT an argument. It is a stance you have been parroting but it is not an argument. If you have not rigorously tested, questioned and then accepted your premises you are just whistling dixie in the wind.  And when those premises are challenged you should be able to provide a better and more articulate defence of them than the piss weak shite you are splashing around as a feminine prerogative.





Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by mothra on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:06pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 7:57pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 7:43pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 7:37pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:00pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 5:06pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 4:39pm:
Peterson's very first stupidity:

journo: " women earn less than men"

peterson: "no they dont"

journo: "The pay gap is 9 percent less on average"

peterson:Yes but there are multiple reasons for that..."

So he agreed there IS a pay gap..... contradicting his earlier statement....
 

That's not even close to the transcript.

Read it before you put words in his mouth.

https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/psychology/jordan-petersons-channel-4-interview-cathy-newman-transcript/



Really?

Newman: But that’s not true, is it? That 9 percent pay gap, that’s a gap between median hourly earnings between men and women. That exists.

Peterson: Yes. But there’s multiple reasons for that. One of them is gender, but that’s not the only reason.

Once more, in context, this time

Newman: So it seems to a lot of women that they still being dominated and excluded, to quote your words back to you.

Peterson: It does seem that way. But multivariate analysis of the pay gap indicate that it doesn’t exist.

Newman: But that’s not true, is it? That 9 percent pay gap, that’s a gap between median hourly earnings between men and women. That exists.

Peterson: Yes. But there’s multiple reasons for that. One of them is gender, but that’s not the only reason. If you’re a social scientist worth your salt, you never do a univariate analysis. You say women in aggregate are paid less than men. Okay. Well then we break its down by age; we break it down by occupation; we break it down by interest; we break it down by personality.



You mean the context in which he is pushed to contradict himself?

I thought i'd spare you all the humiliation of pointing that out.

No. The context of pay gap had been shifted by Newman from not only - there being a pay gap - to there being a pay gap and men cause it, all else being equal.



I made no mention of Newman, other than to say she conducted that interview very poorly. You're shifting the goal posts.

I was talking about Peterson who both claims the pay gap is non-existent then goes on to explain why it is so, ergo, he contradicts himself

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by mothra on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:08pm

Frank wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 7:59pm:
Mothra Theresa - you are not up to it.  You are too thick and inarticulate. You never provide an actual agreement, only 'no-but' because you cannot.

Emoting and being smug and worked up about how righteous you think you are is NOT an argument. It is a stance you have been parroting but it is not an argument. If you have not rigorously tested, questioned and then accepted your premises you are just whistling dixie in the wind.  And when those premises are challenged you should be able to provide a better and more articulate defence of them than the piss weak shite you are splashing around as a feminine prerogative.



Yet i've made no claims.

And you call me emotional. The above post of yours is complete emotive wank.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by MeisterEckhart on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:14pm

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:06pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 7:57pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 7:43pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 7:37pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:00pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 5:06pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 4:39pm:
Peterson's very first stupidity:

journo: " women earn less than men"

peterson: "no they dont"

journo: "The pay gap is 9 percent less on average"

peterson:Yes but there are multiple reasons for that..."

So he agreed there IS a pay gap..... contradicting his earlier statement....
 

That's not even close to the transcript.

Read it before you put words in his mouth.

https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/psychology/jordan-petersons-channel-4-interview-cathy-newman-transcript/



Really?

Newman: But that’s not true, is it? That 9 percent pay gap, that’s a gap between median hourly earnings between men and women. That exists.

Peterson: Yes. But there’s multiple reasons for that. One of them is gender, but that’s not the only reason.

Once more, in context, this time

Newman: So it seems to a lot of women that they still being dominated and excluded, to quote your words back to you.

Peterson: It does seem that way. But multivariate analysis of the pay gap indicate that it doesn’t exist.

Newman: But that’s not true, is it? That 9 percent pay gap, that’s a gap between median hourly earnings between men and women. That exists.

Peterson: Yes. But there’s multiple reasons for that. One of them is gender, but that’s not the only reason. If you’re a social scientist worth your salt, you never do a univariate analysis. You say women in aggregate are paid less than men. Okay. Well then we break its down by age; we break it down by occupation; we break it down by interest; we break it down by personality.



You mean the context in which he is pushed to contradict himself?

I thought i'd spare you all the humiliation of pointing that out.

No. The context of pay gap had been shifted by Newman from not only - there being a pay gap - to there being a pay gap and men cause it, all else being equal.



I made no mention of Newman, other than to say she conducted that interview very poorly. You're shifting the goal posts.

I was talking about Peterson who both claims the pay gap is non-existent then goes on to explain why it is so, ergo, he contradicts himself

Ergo, in context, he addressed Newman's pay gap (extended version) - there being a pay gap and men cause it, all else being equal.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by mothra on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:23pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:14pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:06pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 7:57pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 7:43pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 7:37pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:00pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 5:06pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 4:39pm:
Peterson's very first stupidity:

journo: " women earn less than men"

peterson: "no they dont"

journo: "The pay gap is 9 percent less on average"

peterson:Yes but there are multiple reasons for that..."

So he agreed there IS a pay gap..... contradicting his earlier statement....
 

That's not even close to the transcript.

Read it before you put words in his mouth.

https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/psychology/jordan-petersons-channel-4-interview-cathy-newman-transcript/



Really?

Newman: But that’s not true, is it? That 9 percent pay gap, that’s a gap between median hourly earnings between men and women. That exists.

Peterson: Yes. But there’s multiple reasons for that. One of them is gender, but that’s not the only reason.

Once more, in context, this time

Newman: So it seems to a lot of women that they still being dominated and excluded, to quote your words back to you.

Peterson: It does seem that way. But multivariate analysis of the pay gap indicate that it doesn’t exist.

Newman: But that’s not true, is it? That 9 percent pay gap, that’s a gap between median hourly earnings between men and women. That exists.

Peterson: Yes. But there’s multiple reasons for that. One of them is gender, but that’s not the only reason. If you’re a social scientist worth your salt, you never do a univariate analysis. You say women in aggregate are paid less than men. Okay. Well then we break its down by age; we break it down by occupation; we break it down by interest; we break it down by personality.



You mean the context in which he is pushed to contradict himself?

I thought i'd spare you all the humiliation of pointing that out.

No. The context of pay gap had been shifted by Newman from not only - there being a pay gap - to there being a pay gap and men cause it, all else being equal.



I made no mention of Newman, other than to say she conducted that interview very poorly. You're shifting the goal posts.

I was talking about Peterson who both claims the pay gap is non-existent then goes on to explain why it is so, ergo, he contradicts himself

Ergo, in context, he addressed Newman's pay gap (extended version) - there being a pay gap and men cause it, all else being equal.



Nobody made the juvenile claim that "men cause it" ... other than the morons on this forum.

Why must everything be reduced to such inflammatory and counterproductive slogans that nobody ever actually said?

But to that point, even Peterson admits that part of it is purely about gender and prejudice.

I think you'll find, as would Peterson if he got his head out of his own arse long enough, that feminists have been saying for generations that the pay gap is multifaceted. Peterson is, in inimical form, just claiming other people's ideas as his own.




Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by MeisterEckhart on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:34pm

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:23pm:
Nobody made the juvenile claim that "men cause it" ... other than the morons on this forum.

Newman: So it seems to a lot of women that they're still being dominated and excluded, to quote your words back to you. [which Peterson never said]

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by mothra on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:38pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:34pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:23pm:
Nobody made the juvenile claim that "men cause it" ... other than the morons on this forum.

Newman: So it seems to a lot of women that they're still being dominated and excluded, to quote your words back to you. [which Peterson never said]



And that translates to you as "men cause it" does it?

Defensive much? Were Peterson a psychologist worthy of even a fraction of his self-opinion, he's immediately diagnose that as defensiveness.

I don't know what it is about you lot on here. Obsessed with "blame" and "guilt". I keep telling you that's not going to get us anywhere.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by MeisterEckhart on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:41pm

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:38pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:34pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:23pm:
Nobody made the juvenile claim that "men cause it" ... other than the morons on this forum.

Newman: So it seems to a lot of women that they're still being dominated and excluded, to quote your words back to you. [which Peterson never said]



And that translates to you as "men cause it" does it?

Defensive much? Were Peterson a psychologist worthy of even a fraction of his self-opinion, he's immediately diagnose that as defensiveness.

I don't know what it is about you lot on here. Obsessed with "blame" and "guilt". I keep telling you that's not going to get us anywhere.

What Newman was (mis)quoting back to Peterson was what he'd written in '12 Rules for Life' -

Let me put it quite to you from the book where you say “there are whole disciplines in universities forthrightly hostile towards men. These are the areas of study dominated by the postmodern stroke neo-Marxist claim the Western culture in particular is an oppressive structure created by white men to dominate and exclude women.”

Do you see how she abused the context of Peterson's written words?

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by mothra on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:47pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:41pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:38pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:34pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:23pm:
Nobody made the juvenile claim that "men cause it" ... other than the morons on this forum.

Newman: So it seems to a lot of women that they're still being dominated and excluded, to quote your words back to you. [which Peterson never said]



And that translates to you as "men cause it" does it?

Defensive much? Were Peterson a psychologist worthy of even a fraction of his self-opinion, he's immediately diagnose that as defensiveness.

I don't know what it is about you lot on here. Obsessed with "blame" and "guilt". I keep telling you that's not going to get us anywhere.

What Newman was (mis)quoting back to Peterson was what he'd written in '12 Rules for Life' -

Let me put it quite to you from the book where you say “there are whole disciplines in universities forthrightly hostile towards men. These are the areas of study dominated by the postmodern stroke neo-Marxist claim the Western culture in particular is an oppressive structure created by white men to dominate and exclude women.”

Do you see how she abused the context of Peterson's written words?


More deflection to run away from the fact you're cornered.

I am not defending that interviewer. I've said twice now she was poor.

But if you don't think that this world has been set up by men, for men and we are still in the processes of dismantling that, then you've not been paying attention to any part of history.

Furthermore, Peterson himself refers to women's tendency to be "agreeable". Do you think this nurture or nature? Think about it.

See? Multi-faceted. Not Peterson's original work.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by MeisterEckhart on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:58pm

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:47pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:41pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:38pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:34pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:23pm:
Nobody made the juvenile claim that "men cause it" ... other than the morons on this forum.

Newman: So it seems to a lot of women that they're still being dominated and excluded, to quote your words back to you. [which Peterson never said]



And that translates to you as "men cause it" does it?

Defensive much? Were Peterson a psychologist worthy of even a fraction of his self-opinion, he's immediately diagnose that as defensiveness.

I don't know what it is about you lot on here. Obsessed with "blame" and "guilt". I keep telling you that's not going to get us anywhere.

What Newman was (mis)quoting back to Peterson was what he'd written in '12 Rules for Life' -

Let me put it quite to you from the book where you say “there are whole disciplines in universities forthrightly hostile towards men. These are the areas of study dominated by the postmodern stroke neo-Marxist claim the Western culture in particular is an oppressive structure created by white men to dominate and exclude women.”

Do you see how she abused the context of Peterson's written words?


More deflection to run away from the fact you're cornered.

I am not defending that interviewer. I've said twice now she was poor.

But if you don't think that this world has been set up by men, for men and we are still in the processes of dismantling that, then you've not been paying attention to any part of history.

Furthermore, Peterson himself refers to women's tendency to be "agreeable". Do you think this nurture or nature? Think about it.

See? Multi-faceted. Not Peterson's original work.

Both TGD and you have attempted to demonstrate that Peterson contradicted himself. He didn't.

I'm sure most women understand that the issue is multi-faceted, Newman, at least in this interview, didn't want to go there; she wanted to flatten the rugged geography of the point to a plain with one hill (which she ended up dying on) - that there is a pay gap (via domination and exclusion - which she misattributed to Peterson) and men cause it.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by mothra on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:01pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:58pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:47pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:41pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:38pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:34pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:23pm:
Nobody made the juvenile claim that "men cause it" ... other than the morons on this forum.

Newman: So it seems to a lot of women that they're still being dominated and excluded, to quote your words back to you. [which Peterson never said]



And that translates to you as "men cause it" does it?

Defensive much? Were Peterson a psychologist worthy of even a fraction of his self-opinion, he's immediately diagnose that as defensiveness.

I don't know what it is about you lot on here. Obsessed with "blame" and "guilt". I keep telling you that's not going to get us anywhere.

What Newman was (mis)quoting back to Peterson was what he'd written in '12 Rules for Life' -

Let me put it quite to you from the book where you say “there are whole disciplines in universities forthrightly hostile towards men. These are the areas of study dominated by the postmodern stroke neo-Marxist claim the Western culture in particular is an oppressive structure created by white men to dominate and exclude women.”

Do you see how she abused the context of Peterson's written words?


More deflection to run away from the fact you're cornered.

I am not defending that interviewer. I've said twice now she was poor.

But if you don't think that this world has been set up by men, for men and we are still in the processes of dismantling that, then you've not been paying attention to any part of history.

Furthermore, Peterson himself refers to women's tendency to be "agreeable". Do you think this nurture or nature? Think about it.

See? Multi-faceted. Not Peterson's original work.

Both TGD and you have attempted to demonstrate that Peterson contradicted himself. He didn't.

I'm sure most women understand that the issue is multi-faceted, Newman, at least in this interview didn't want to there; she wanted to flatten the rugged geography of the point to a plain with one hill (which she ended up dying on) - that there is a pay gap (via domination and exclusion - which she misattributed to Peterson) and men cause it.



Of course he contradicted himself! I posted the direct quote!

First he said there was no gender pay gap ... then he went on to detail factors that cause the pay gap.

You can't make this stuff up.

And, you utter hysteric, absolutely nobody said "men cause it".

Simply sticking your fingers in your ears and repeating falsehoods doesn't make you right. It just makes you look as churlish and self-congratulatory as Peterson.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by MeisterEckhart on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:12pm

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:01pm:
Of course he contradicted himself! I posted the direct quote!

First he said there was no gender pay gap ... then he went on to detail factors that cause the pay gap.

You can't make this stuff up.

And, you utter hysteric, absolutely nobody said "men cause it".

Simply sticking your fingers in your ears and repeating falsehoods doesn't make you right. It just makes you look as churlish and self-congratulatory as Peterson.

No. You quoted him out of context, as TGD did.

I quoted Peterson in context.

Newman not only added that men cause the pay gap via domination and exclusion, she also abused Peterson's quote from his book by claiming he'd said it.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by mothra on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:15pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:12pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:01pm:
Of course he contradicted himself! I posted the direct quote!

First he said there was no gender pay gap ... then he went on to detail factors that cause the pay gap.

You can't make this stuff up.

And, you utter hysteric, absolutely nobody said "men cause it".

Simply sticking your fingers in your ears and repeating falsehoods doesn't make you right. It just makes you look as churlish and self-congratulatory as Peterson.

No. You quoted him out of context, as TGD did.

I quoted Peterson in context.

Newman not only added that men cause the pay gap via domination and exclusion, she also abused Peterson's quote from his book by claiming he'd said it.


No i didn't I quoted explaining that the wage gap was multi-faceted just after he said there was no wage gap.

Look, you can't just keep pretending he didn't do that.

Hang on, of course you can. Look where we are.

And she never said "men cause the pay gap". You are simply paraphrasing her and doing so hysterically.  I know she was poo but she wasn't that bad.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:21pm
Well there is no 'gender pay gap' - there are differences between sectors in levels of income, and with the proviso that everyone works the same hours - which is demonstrably not the case - the figures come out slightly in favour of women overall.

But we all know that by now....

What does need to be addressed is the fallacies by which this non-issue continues to be pushed for political advantage, and how to put an end to such nonsenses that derive from it as 'affirmative action' by any name.

Time to declare equality and just get on with it - not continue to make life harder for everyone, with some constantly thinking they are being short-changed and this causing problems in their work and home life, and others be quite deliberately cut out of genuine equal opportunity as a result...

NEITHER of these will deliver a willing and performing workforce, but rather a divided one that simply functions all over the place instead of as a well-oiled machine.

That might advantage employers and conservatives by permitting them to deal with a divided workforce, but it does not genuinely enhance a nation overall, and that advantaging will only make things worse again.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by MeisterEckhart on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:22pm

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:15pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:12pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:01pm:
Of course he contradicted himself! I posted the direct quote!

First he said there was no gender pay gap ... then he went on to detail factors that cause the pay gap.

You can't make this stuff up.

And, you utter hysteric, absolutely nobody said "men cause it".

Simply sticking your fingers in your ears and repeating falsehoods doesn't make you right. It just makes you look as churlish and self-congratulatory as Peterson.

No. You quoted him out of context, as TGD did.

I quoted Peterson in context.

Newman not only added that men cause the pay gap via domination and exclusion, she also abused Peterson's quote from his book by claiming he'd said it.


No i didn't I quoted explaining that the wage gap was multi-faceted just after he said there was no wage gap.

Look, you can't just keep pretending he didn't do that.

Hang on, of course you can. Look where we are.

And she never said "men cause the pay gap". You are simply paraphrasing her and doing so hysterically.  I know she was poo but she wasn't that bad.

Newman: So it seems to a lot of women that they still being dominated and excluded, to quote your words back to you.

Prior to having referred to women being 'dominated and excluded' in the context of white men doing it.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by mothra on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:25pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:22pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:15pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:12pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:01pm:
Of course he contradicted himself! I posted the direct quote!

First he said there was no gender pay gap ... then he went on to detail factors that cause the pay gap.

You can't make this stuff up.

And, you utter hysteric, absolutely nobody said "men cause it".

Simply sticking your fingers in your ears and repeating falsehoods doesn't make you right. It just makes you look as churlish and self-congratulatory as Peterson.

No. You quoted him out of context, as TGD did.

I quoted Peterson in context.

Newman not only added that men cause the pay gap via domination and exclusion, she also abused Peterson's quote from his book by claiming he'd said it.


No i didn't I quoted explaining that the wage gap was multi-faceted just after he said there was no wage gap.

Look, you can't just keep pretending he didn't do that.

Hang on, of course you can. Look where we are.

And she never said "men cause the pay gap". You are simply paraphrasing her and doing so hysterically.  I know she was poo but she wasn't that bad.

Newman: So it seems to a lot of women that they still being dominated and excluded, to quote your words back to you.

Prior to having referred to women being 'dominated and excluded' in the context of white men doing it.


So yes, you were paraphrasing.

And to make it worse, now you've said she's claimed it's white men doing it!

This is ridiculous. Seriously, what's the point?

Even among the semi-literate on here, you're hard up to get an open and honest debate.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by MeisterEckhart on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:31pm

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:25pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:22pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:15pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:12pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:01pm:
Of course he contradicted himself! I posted the direct quote!

First he said there was no gender pay gap ... then he went on to detail factors that cause the pay gap.

You can't make this stuff up.

And, you utter hysteric, absolutely nobody said "men cause it".

Simply sticking your fingers in your ears and repeating falsehoods doesn't make you right. It just makes you look as churlish and self-congratulatory as Peterson.

No. You quoted him out of context, as TGD did.

I quoted Peterson in context.

Newman not only added that men cause the pay gap via domination and exclusion, she also abused Peterson's quote from his book by claiming he'd said it.


No i didn't I quoted explaining that the wage gap was multi-faceted just after he said there was no wage gap.

Look, you can't just keep pretending he didn't do that.

Hang on, of course you can. Look where we are.

And she never said "men cause the pay gap". You are simply paraphrasing her and doing so hysterically.  I know she was poo but she wasn't that bad.

Newman: So it seems to a lot of women that they still being dominated and excluded, to quote your words back to you.

Prior to having referred to women being 'dominated and excluded' in the context of white men doing it.


So yes, you were paraphrasing.

And to make it worse, now you've said she's claimed it's white men doing it!

This is ridiculous. Seriously, what's the point?

Even among the semi-literate on here, you're hard up to get an open and honest debate.

Newman was attributing the pay gap to white men dominating and excluding women, and abusing Peterson's quote from his book to do it.

Speaking of a point, why would Newman add 'to quote your words back to you' to her point?

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by mothra on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:35pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:31pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:25pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:22pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:15pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:12pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:01pm:
Of course he contradicted himself! I posted the direct quote!

First he said there was no gender pay gap ... then he went on to detail factors that cause the pay gap.

You can't make this stuff up.

And, you utter hysteric, absolutely nobody said "men cause it".

Simply sticking your fingers in your ears and repeating falsehoods doesn't make you right. It just makes you look as churlish and self-congratulatory as Peterson.

No. You quoted him out of context, as TGD did.

I quoted Peterson in context.

Newman not only added that men cause the pay gap via domination and exclusion, she also abused Peterson's quote from his book by claiming he'd said it.


No i didn't I quoted explaining that the wage gap was multi-faceted just after he said there was no wage gap.

Look, you can't just keep pretending he didn't do that.

Hang on, of course you can. Look where we are.

And she never said "men cause the pay gap". You are simply paraphrasing her and doing so hysterically.  I know she was poo but she wasn't that bad.

Newman: So it seems to a lot of women that they still being dominated and excluded, to quote your words back to you.

Prior to having referred to women being 'dominated and excluded' in the context of white men doing it.


So yes, you were paraphrasing.

And to make it worse, now you've said she's claimed it's white men doing it!

This is ridiculous. Seriously, what's the point?

Even among the semi-literate on here, you're hard up to get an open and honest debate.

Newman was attributing the pay gap to white men dominating and excluding women, and abusing Peterson's quote from his book to do it.

Speaking of a point, why would Newman add 'to quote your words back to you' to her point?



So yes. You paraphrased.

And i'm not interested in debating her performance. I have repeatedly said she gave a poor interview. But if you want your question answered, perhaps you can examine your own motives? After all, you keep doing precisely what you are accusing her of having done.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by MeisterEckhart on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:39pm

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:35pm:
So yes. You paraphrased.

And i'm not interested in debating her performance. I have repeatedly said she gave a poor interview. But if you want your question answered, perhaps you can examine your own motives? After all, you keep doing precisely what you are accusing her of having done.

So she put it to Peterson that it was his words, not hers.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by mothra on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:43pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:39pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:35pm:
So yes. You paraphrased.

And i'm not interested in debating her performance. I have repeatedly said she gave a poor interview. But if you want your question answered, perhaps you can examine your own motives? After all, you keep doing precisely what you are accusing her of having done.

So she put it to Peterson that it was his words, not hers.


As you are putting it to me that the words you have ascribed to her are her words, not yours.

Oh this is ridiculous.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by MeisterEckhart on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:48pm

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:43pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:39pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:35pm:
So yes. You paraphrased.

And i'm not interested in debating her performance. I have repeatedly said she gave a poor interview. But if you want your question answered, perhaps you can examine your own motives? After all, you keep doing precisely what you are accusing her of having done.

So she put it to Peterson that it was his words, not hers.


As you are putting it to me that the words you have ascribed to her are her words, not yours.

Oh this is ridiculous.

You can read the transcript.

Newman: So it seems to a lot of women that they still being dominated and excluded, to quote your words back to you.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Frank on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:48pm
What IS your point, Mothra?



Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by mothra on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:51pm

Frank wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:48pm:
What IS your point, Mothra?



Was i talking to you?

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Frank on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:57pm
What IS your point, addressing anyone?


Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by mothra on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:02pm

Frank wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:57pm:
What IS your point, addressing anyone?



Read back. Or not. I don't care.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Frank on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:02pm
Do you have a point, Mothra?

Can you articulate it?

Or is the request too patriarchal oppressive white male rationalistic colonialistic oppressive awful white male insensitive racist racist racist?


Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Frank on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:09pm

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:02pm:

Frank wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:57pm:
What IS your point, addressing anyone?



Read back. Or not. I don't care.

:'( :'( :'( :'( :'(

You are posting shite and you don't care. 

Never mind the pay gap - there is a massive intellectual gap. Do you have any strategies for catching up and closing your gap  of your intellectual disadvantage? The Great Decolletage might have a government subsidised job for you.




Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by mothra on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:13pm
I've made many points, Frank. I'm not listing them for you because you're too lazy to read back and naturally assume you have some sort of authority over me.

Get bent.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Xavier on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:29pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 7:31pm:

Jasin wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 5:06pm:
These four could easily sum up the x4 Middle-Eastern Religions of
Zarathustrianism
Judaism
Christianity
Mohommedism

Did you mean

Zoroastrianism
Judaism
Christianity
Islam


Zoroastrianism is the Greek word for the original Zarathustrianism.

Islam is a State, just like Israel.
Mohommedism and Judaism are the Religion

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by MeisterEckhart on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:49pm

Jasin wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:29pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 7:31pm:

Jasin wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 5:06pm:
These four could easily sum up the x4 Middle-Eastern Religions of
Zarathustrianism
Judaism
Christianity
Mohommedism

Did you mean

Zoroastrianism
Judaism
Christianity
Islam


Zoroastrianism is the Greek word for the original Zarathustrianism.

Islam is a State, just like Israel.
Mohommedism and Judaism are the Religion

No. The term Mohammedanism is offensive to Mulims as they do not worship Mohammed as Christians worship Christ - they honour him as a prophet, not a god. Islam means submission (to God) in Arabic. It is not a state.

Zarathustrianism was coined by the German Hermann Lommel.


Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Xavier on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:50pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:49pm:

Jasin wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:29pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 7:31pm:

Jasin wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 5:06pm:
These four could easily sum up the x4 Middle-Eastern Religions of
Zarathustrianism
Judaism
Christianity
Mohommedism

Did you mean

Zoroastrianism
Judaism
Christianity
Islam


Zoroastrianism is the Greek word for the original Zarathustrianism.

Islam is a State, just like Israel.
Mohommedism and Judaism are the Religion

No. The term Mohammedanism is offensive to Mulims as they do not worship Mohammed as Christians worship Christ - they honour him as a prophet, not a god. Islam means submission (to God) in Arabic. It is not a state.

Zarathustrianism was coined by the German Hermann Lommel.


Interesting. I'll look into it.
Am not afraid to be wrong in pursuit of truth, etc.
Cheers.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Boris on Sep 13th, 2022 at 12:09am
Zoroastrianism
Judaism
Christianity
Islam

The Persian word for Zoroastrianism is Zartosht

All these religions are Zoroastrianism - Paradise is an Avestan word and Monotheism is Zoroastrianism - Heaven Hell, Angels Demons - all Zoroaster

the name is the same but the fundamental beliefs are Zoroastrian

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by freediver on Sep 13th, 2022 at 6:35am

Quote:
It is not a state.


According to Muslims, it naturally is. That is why Muslims start pushing for a religious state as soon as they are in a position to do so. Muhammad was a political leader, just as much as a religious one, and his movement is just as political as it is religious.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Gnads on Sep 13th, 2022 at 7:55am

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:25pm:

Gnads wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:20pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:09pm:

Gnads wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:03pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:00pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 5:06pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 4:39pm:
Peterson's very first stupidity:

journo: " women earn less than men"

peterson: "no they dont"

journo: "The pay gap is 9 percent less on average"

peterson:Yes but there are multiple reasons for that..."

So he agreed there IS a pay gap..... contradicting his earlier statement....
 

That's not even close to the transcript.

Read it before you put words in his mouth.

https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/psychology/jordan-petersons-channel-4-interview-cathy-newman-transcript/



Really?

Newman: But that’s not true, is it? That 9 percent pay gap, that’s a gap between median hourly earnings between men and women. That exists.

Peterson: Yes. But there’s multiple reasons for that. One of them is gender, but that’s not the only reason.



So you want to list all the other reasons there's a difference in earnings?

Seems like TGD you don't listen either.



No i didn't listen. Peterson irritates me immensely. I read the transcript. The interviewer was an idiot, agreed.

But Peterson said nothing the feminists he derides haven't been saying for generations. He just writes it off as excuses whereas feminists are advocating for change for equality.


As he said - define equality - or are you talking about "equality of outcome?".

And he explained why that was no good.

If you're so intelligent you shouldn't need it explained that it's no good either.

I know he irritates you immensely .... it's because he's smarter than you & better at discussing & explaining a contrary view of issues that you parrot like decades of radical feminist dogma.



I mean equality of worth. Can you get your head around that one?

And nobody thinks Peterson is as clever as he thinks he is. It's usually half-wits bamboozled by his word salads that are impressed by him. Anyone with any sense can see quite clearly that he's not actually saying anything at all most of th time and when he does, it's usually someone else's work.



Got a link to back that claim?

As a scholar/clinical psychologist would he not have studied other peoples work?

Of course you're the only one with sense ;D

Word salads?..... you're fairly handy with those.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by MeisterEckhart on Sep 13th, 2022 at 8:13am

freediver wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 6:35am:

Quote:
It is not a state.


According to Muslims, it naturally is. That is why Muslims start pushing for a religious state as soon as they are in a position to do so. Muhammad was a political leader, just as much as a religious one, and his movement is just as political as it is religious.

You are referring to an Islamic state (a religious state), not a state called Islam.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Gnads on Sep 13th, 2022 at 8:35am

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:23pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:14pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:06pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 7:57pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 7:43pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 7:37pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:00pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 5:06pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 4:39pm:
Peterson's very first stupidity:

journo: " women earn less than men"

peterson: "no they dont"

journo: "The pay gap is 9 percent less on average"

peterson:Yes but there are multiple reasons for that..."

So he agreed there IS a pay gap..... contradicting his earlier statement....
 

That's not even close to the transcript.

Read it before you put words in his mouth.

https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/psychology/jordan-petersons-channel-4-interview-cathy-newman-transcript/



Really?

Newman: But that’s not true, is it? That 9 percent pay gap, that’s a gap between median hourly earnings between men and women. That exists.

Peterson: Yes. But there’s multiple reasons for that. One of them is gender, but that’s not the only reason.

Once more, in context, this time

Newman: So it seems to a lot of women that they still being dominated and excluded, to quote your words back to you.

Peterson: It does seem that way. But multivariate analysis of the pay gap indicate that it doesn’t exist.

Newman: But that’s not true, is it? That 9 percent pay gap, that’s a gap between median hourly earnings between men and women. That exists.

Peterson: Yes. But there’s multiple reasons for that. One of them is gender, but that’s not the only reason. If you’re a social scientist worth your salt, you never do a univariate analysis. You say women in aggregate are paid less than men. Okay. Well then we break its down by age; we break it down by occupation; we break it down by interest; we break it down by personality.



You mean the context in which he is pushed to contradict himself?

I thought i'd spare you all the humiliation of pointing that out.

No. The context of pay gap had been shifted by Newman from not only - there being a pay gap - to there being a pay gap and men cause it, all else being equal.



I made no mention of Newman, other than to say she conducted that interview very poorly. You're shifting the goal posts.

I was talking about Peterson who both claims the pay gap is non-existent then goes on to explain why it is so, ergo, he contradicts himself

Ergo, in context, he addressed Newman's pay gap (extended version) - there being a pay gap and men cause it, all else being equal.



Nobody made the juvenile claim that "men cause it" ... other than the morons on this forum.

Why must everything be reduced to such inflammatory and counterproductive slogans that nobody ever actually said?

But to that point, even Peterson admits that part of it is purely about gender and prejudice.

I think you'll find, as would Peterson if he got his head out of his own arse long enough, that feminists have been saying for generations that the pay gap is multifaceted. Peterson is, in inimical form, just claiming other people's ideas as his own.


;D Newman did.. that was her whole premise of the interview.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Gnads on Sep 13th, 2022 at 8:53am

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:38pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:34pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 8:23pm:
Nobody made the juvenile claim that "men cause it" ... other than the morons on this forum.

Newman: So it seems to a lot of women that they're still being dominated and excluded, to quote your words back to you. [which Peterson never said]



And that translates to you as "men cause it" does it?

Defensive much? Were Peterson a psychologist worthy of even a fraction of his self-opinion, he's immediately diagnose that as defensiveness.

I don't know what it is about you lot on here. Obsessed with "blame" and "guilt". I keep telling you that's not going to get us anywhere.



Newman was certainly the one doing the blaming

& constantly trying to the discussion back on Petersen by inferring he said this or that - which in every case he hadn't said .... because she was not listening - just hell bent on her own agenda

time after time when he answered her questions she trotted out the "so what you're saying" .... ad infinitum trying to twist everything he said to suit her narrative.

Hypothetical-(youtuber quote)


Quote:
Petersen: "I love the rain".

Newman: “So what you’re saying is you hate the sun and you want everyone to suffer from lack of Vitamin D?”


You're fairly adept at twisting & making assumptions in espousing your looney leftist ideals.

Oh & not forgetting patting yourself on the back about being intelligent & the only one with any sense. ::)


Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by MeisterEckhart on Sep 13th, 2022 at 9:00am
Context.

Newman: So it seems to a lot of women that they're still being dominated and excluded, to quote your words back to you.

Newman has raised the issue of the pay gap earlier. She now claims that women are still being dominated and excluded [did she mean caused by men? What else could she mean - by other women, climate change?]. Newman also suggests that Peterson said as much in one of his books - which he didn't.

Peterson: It does seem that way. But multivariate analysis of the pay gap indicate that it doesn’t exist.

Note that Peterson acknowledges the pay gap, but is now answering Newman's augmented statement about it which includes, what Newman believes, is the reason for it - that men dominate and exclude women.

Newman: But that’s not true, is it? That 9 percent pay gap, that’s a gap between median hourly earnings between men and women. That exists.

Now Newman returns to the pay gap alone, having established that she believes there is a pay gap and men cause it.

Peterson: Yes. But there’s multiple reasons for that. One of them is gender, but that’s not the only reason.

Peterson is responding to Newman's claim - that there is a pay gap and men cause it.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Gnads on Sep 13th, 2022 at 9:02am

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:15pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:12pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:01pm:
Of course he contradicted himself! I posted the direct quote!

First he said there was no gender pay gap ... then he went on to detail factors that cause the pay gap.

You can't make this stuff up.

And, you utter hysteric, absolutely nobody said "men cause it".

Simply sticking your fingers in your ears and repeating falsehoods doesn't make you right. It just makes you look as churlish and self-congratulatory as Peterson.

No. You quoted him out of context, as TGD did.

I quoted Peterson in context.

Newman not only added that men cause the pay gap via domination and exclusion, she also abused Peterson's quote from his book by claiming he'd said it.


No i didn't I quoted explaining that the wage gap was multi-faceted just after he said there was no wage gap.

Look, you can't just keep pretending he didn't do that.

Hang on, of course you can. Look where we are.

And she never said "men cause the pay gap". You are simply paraphrasing her and doing so hysterically.  I know she was poo but she wasn't that bad.



He actually said the reasons for a perceived pay gap - like you & Newman parrot was multifaceted.

He also said that studies had shown that  multivariant analysis, taking all things into account, that the gender pay gap doesn't really exist.

Or did you not hear that?

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 13th, 2022 at 9:19am
Men per hour actually worked earn less than women per hour actually worked.... those are the fig-yures, Major Kong...

I'm on the road today - I'll re-work them a little for the innumerate late... try again to get across their deep-seated ideological idiosyncrasies and approach reality for them.

Per actual hour worked men are paid on average less than women.  Eat it.

Where's lefty?  The shock of my suggesting that it being the case, by his admission, that some women where he works are paid less than him, and that the government, according to his ideological stance, should therefore march in and compel the boss to pay those women the same as he is paid seems to have caused an explosion in his magazine akin to HMS Hood...

Poor fellow - always was a little too high-strung...

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Frank on Sep 13th, 2022 at 9:31am

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:13pm:
I've made many points, Frank. I'm not listing them for you because you're too lazy to read back and naturally assume you have some sort of authority over me.

Get bent.


No you did not.  You verballed Petersen, like Newman, than dismissed him as not worth listening to. You did not engage with any of the points he made because, like Newman, you won't  budge from claiming men, no matter what evidence is presented to you.

You have made no counter-points. You have not even tried to show how men created the pay gap you insist exists as a male construct for the purposes of domination.


Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Frank on Sep 13th, 2022 at 9:40am



Newman: So it seems to a lot of women that they still being dominated and excluded, to quote your words back to you.

Peterson: It does seem that way. But multivariate analysis of the pay gap indicate that it doesn’t exist.

Newman: But that’s not true, is it? That 9 percent pay gap, that’s a gap between median hourly earnings between men and women. That exists.

Peterson: Yes. But there’s multiple reasons for that. One of them is gender, but that’s not the only reason. If you’re a social scientist worth your salt, you never do a univariate analysis. You say women in aggregate are paid less than men. Okay. Well then we break its down by age; we break it down by occupation; we break it down by interest; we break it down by personality.

https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/psychology/jordan-petersons-channel-4-interview-cathy-newman-transcript/

The first 'doesn't exist refers to the 'it' which is in red.

What does exist is the 9% gap (which was not the 'it' in the first line). That gap exists BUT NOT because of the 'it' but due to multiple reasons, only one of it is gender and NONE of it is the 'it', the domination and exclusion of women.


Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 13th, 2022 at 9:44am

Captain Caveman wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 4:50pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 4:08pm:

Gnads wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 1:54pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 11:49am:

Kat wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 11:13am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 10:21am:
;D The fictitious gender pay gap .... now you're pedalling a "black gap" as a reason for the duplication of representation to Parliament.

everything you're barrowing here is race based bullshyte.   


Well, no. It's anything but 'fictitious'.

It's not universal, by any means - I've worked with women in some of my jobs and we've
received the same wage for the same work.

But it DOES exist in some fields - mostly 'professional', for some reason.


The feminized nature of the low-paid  caring professions (child care, health and age care) is also a factor in '"the gender pay gap" (ie men on average earn more than women).


That's an oversimplified generality.

Men on average earn more than women?

Doing what?


Trades like building/electrical  etc etc,  more highly paid than carers in age care etc.


Quote:
All you are trying to do is compare apples to rockmelons.


Refuted above.

[quote]A man doing the same job would be paid the same.


Correct....but women on average do different work to men. 

[quote]You're like this journo - who had rings run around her with logic, composure & professionalism.

https://youtu.be/aMcjxSThD54


Oh no..the awful Jordan Peterson, I'd make a fool of him in 10 minutes or less.
[/quote]

Bwahahahahahaha.[/quote]

er...CC, that's not debate. 


Quote:
So out of everyone that's tried, you think you can....... and you're telling an internet forum.
How come you're not leading one of these crazy terrorist lefty groups who are trying oh so desperately to "make a fool of him" .


in short, because those groups don't understand the human condition, and the basis of economics (determing who lives and who starves).


Quote:
Even news anchors get left high and dry.
It's smacking hilarious.
.

News anchors are as dumb as they come.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXecLXlzEXE

And I identified the error which  Peterson  made in the linked video.


Quote:
And ya's label him far right, well your media does and you just parrot it.


That's your first mistake; I haven't labelled  him far right.


Quote:
Good luck
Hope to see you one day try and pull this off.


Thanks.


Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 13th, 2022 at 10:01am

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 5:06pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 4:39pm:
Peterson's very first stupidity:

journo: " women earn less than men"

peterson: "no they dont"

journo: "The pay gap is 9 percent less on average"

peterson:Yes but there are multiple reasons for that..."

So he agreed there IS a pay gap..... contradicting his earlier statement....
 

That's not even close to the transcript.

Read it before you put words in his mouth.

https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/psychology/jordan-petersons-channel-4-interview-cathy-newman-transcript/


Read it? I listened to the video carefully.

Can you deny Peterson said: "YES, but....."?

Of course women CANNOT ever earn the same as men on average, because they have to take time off to bear and suckle babies.

One solution is to pay higher wages for child and age care workers,  who are largely female.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 13th, 2022 at 10:11am

Gnads wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 5:51pm:
And regardless of gender tradesmen & trades women, who do a 4 year apprenticeship and are proficient in their trade are always going to earn more than someone unskilled working in Aged Care or an Assistant in Childcare.


Correct, but why are women ovrwhelming attracted to low-paid age and child care? Partly because juggling family and home responsibilitues directs women to less time-demanding, intensive  career education.


Quote:
My sister in law was  an Early Childhood teacher at Govt & private Kindies & Preps. She also had 2 children during her career.


We are talking averages,; your sister and Gail Kelly for that matter (former CEO of Westpac who bemoaned the fact her salary was many multiples of her niece, a teacher),   have nothing to do with the gender pay gap.


Quote:
The Gender Pay gap is a furphy & so is your racist "black Gap".


refuted above....and er... the black gap IS racist.....

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 13th, 2022 at 10:23am

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 5:58pm:
[quote author=Gnads link=1660099461/167#167 date=1662969111]
Yet even the obnoxious Peterson admits in the link you shared and claimed to have watched, that the pay gap is a real thing. He just claims that it is multifaceted.

In true Peterson style, he thinks he's being cleverer than everyone else when he says this ... the fact is of course that feminists have been saying the exact same thing for generations.


Spot on. He's a fraud when cornered. 

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 13th, 2022 at 10:35am

Gnads wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:01pm:
He didn't contradict himself & he explained his point .... which was reasons for why women may earn less but they don't get paid less.


on average? Peterson agreed with her, listen yourself.


Quote:
It was like her harping on about equality & he having to ask whether she meant equality of outcome which he explained was not a good or fair outcome.


That old furphy of the Right; no one wants equality of outcome; I want above-poverty partcipation by all.


Quote:
It's like you thinking that women in aged care or child care should get paid as much as electricians, plumbers, builders etc.


No, it's just recognizing women earn less thn men on average; and higher wages in age and child care can assist in overcoming the 'gender pay gap' ...on average. 


Quote:
Its a pharken nonsense.


Apparently you don't understand averages.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by MeisterEckhart on Sep 13th, 2022 at 10:36am

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 10:23am:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 5:58pm:
[quote author=Gnads link=1660099461/167#167 date=1662969111]
Yet even the obnoxious Peterson admits in the link you shared and claimed to have watched, that the pay gap is a real thing. He just claims that it is multifaceted.

In true Peterson style, he thinks he's being cleverer than everyone else when he says this ... the fact is of course that feminists have been saying the exact same thing for generations.


Spot on. He's a fraud when cornered. 

Then, by the same standards, you'd have to concede that Newman, in that interview, was even more deceptive and fraudulent.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:08am

Gnads wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:14pm:
His calm & considered style is what annoys leftist ideologues like you & lefty journalists like Newman.


I was exasperated by Peterson's woolly thinking before the quoted exchange:

Newman: "there is a crisis of masculinity? what do you do about it?"

Perterson: you tell ...you help people  to understand why it's necessary to grow up..to get their act together (ok, in his psychiatrist mode) "it's more like a delineation of destiny that makes life worth living.[/quote]

(Apart from the waffle) note: "you need to tell ...to help people" ....so much for the rugged individual who has to make his own success....


Quote:
You want him to be angry & abusive so play the oppressive white male patriarchy card.


No I want him to show some understanding of the human condition with its  conflict between unconscious instinct and conscious thought.


Quote:
Yes your lefty feminists were parroting the same mantra & Petersen explained to Newman that they were wrong just as she was ...... and you are.


As Mothra noted, feminsts have been saying the same thing as peterson for ages; Peterson just likes to cloud the issue. Fact is women must bear and suckle children
(...which might offend some extreme feminists...), which therefor must interfere with career opportunities on average.



Quote:
Like he said, he chooses his words very very carefully .....


and struggles to put a sensible argument , as outlined above :  "tell... help...." (men how to live full lives)


Quote:
And he has people like you for breakfast on a regular basis.


Pass.I haven't met him.


Quote:
That interview had to be the worst Newman has ever done and I bet she looks back on that & cringes.


Addressed above: he has me cringing.


Quote:
Ahhhhhhhh gotcha! He certainly did ..... and she admitted it.


Care to detail your point? I stopped listening at: "Yes the gender pay gap exists, but..."

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:15am

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 10:36am:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 10:23am:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 5:58pm:
[quote author=Gnads link=1660099461/167#167 date=1662969111]
Yet even the obnoxious Peterson admits in the link you shared and claimed to have watched, that the pay gap is a real thing. He just claims that it is multifaceted.

In true Peterson style, he thinks he's being cleverer than everyone else when he says this ... the fact is of course that feminists have been saying the exact same thing for generations.


Spot on. He's a fraud when cornered. 

Then, by the same standards, you'd have to concede that Newman, in that interview, was even more deceptive and fraudulent.


No, she's a mere journalist with no, or limited,  training in economics, ethics, psychology, anthropology.  Her job is to report events to the public.

Peterson is fraudulently running rings around her.   

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by MeisterEckhart on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:16am

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:08am:
I stopped listening at: "Yes the gender pay gap exists, but..."

Stopped listening, eh! And you think you can take on Peterson!

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:35am

Frank wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:53pm:
(Peterson) does explain his position very clearly - male/female differences in pay, life choices, etc are multi-variant equations and questions.


Clear as mud. Why not just say women have to bear and suckle children, and society's assistance might be necessary in a world where many women are single mothers, and women increasingly want to have independent lifestyles.   


Quote:
She doesn't and only assumes that equality of outcome is an unchallengeable starting point in such a discussion.


'Equality of outcome' is a RW ruse, which the Right confuse with 'equality of opportunity". to avoid establishment of above-poverty participation by all.
Newson herself probably  doesn't understand the implications of this in regard to women's economic outcomes in society 


Quote:
It evidently isn't but her mind is befogged by the ideology and she doesn't have the intelligence and candour to perceive that multi-variant aspect of this and most other such questions.


The Right's understanding of "equality of outcome" is a shibboleth, a ruse as noted above.   


Quote:
It is quite amusing to watch.


I would say excruciating....

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:50am

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:48pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:43pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:39pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:35pm:
So yes. You paraphrased.

And i'm not interested in debating her performance. I have repeatedly said she gave a poor interview. But if you want your question answered, perhaps you can examine your own motives? After all, you keep doing precisely what you are accusing her of having done.

So she put it to Peterson that it was his words, not hers.


As you are putting it to me that the words you have ascribed to her are her words, not yours.

Oh this is ridiculous.

You can read the transcript.

Newman: So it seems to a lot of women that they still being dominated and excluded, to quote your words back to you.


All this after you have  moved on from:

"First he said there was no gender pay gap ... then he went on to detail factors that cause the pay gap.

You can't make this stuff up."

I haven't listened to the rest of the video; he is already exposed as a fraud..even IF he explained the gap is mult-faceted.

As for women being oppressed by men, that is a simplistic analysis. The battle of the sexes?... too much collaberation with the enemy...   

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:53am

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:16am:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:08am:
I stopped listening at: "Yes the gender pay gap exists, but..."

Stopped listening, eh! And you think you can take on Peterson!


Petereson: "Men...need to be told...men need help..."

Yes, I can take on Peterson.



Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by MeisterEckhart on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:55am

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:53am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:16am:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:08am:
I stopped listening at: "Yes the gender pay gap exists, but..."

Stopped listening, eh! And you think you can take on Peterson!


Petereson: "Men...need to be told...men need help..."

Yes, I can take on Peterson.

You haven't shown enough skill for this forum.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Frank on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:59am

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:53am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:16am:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:08am:
I stopped listening at: "Yes the gender pay gap exists, but..."

Stopped listening, eh! And you think you can take on Peterson!


Petereson: "Men...need to be told...men need help..."

Yes, I can take on Peterson.



Common prosperity, one-party state and government knows best,  print mo' money, jobs for all, refuted above, that not debate, 50 years ago is ancient history, freedom is horrible, Marxism is wonderful....ZZZzzzz......

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by MeisterEckhart on Sep 13th, 2022 at 12:00pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:50am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:48pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:43pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:39pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 9:35pm:
So yes. You paraphrased.

And i'm not interested in debating her performance. I have repeatedly said she gave a poor interview. But if you want your question answered, perhaps you can examine your own motives? After all, you keep doing precisely what you are accusing her of having done.

So she put it to Peterson that it was his words, not hers.


As you are putting it to me that the words you have ascribed to her are her words, not yours.

Oh this is ridiculous.

You can read the transcript.

Newman: So it seems to a lot of women that they still being dominated and excluded, to quote your words back to you.


All this after you have  moved on from:

"First he said there was no gender pay gap ... then he went on to detail factors that cause the pay gap.

You can't make this stuff up."

I haven't listened to the rest of the video; he is already exposed as a fraud..even IF he explained the gap is mult-faceted.

As for women being oppressed by men, that is a simplistic analysis. The battle of the sexes?... too much collaberation with the enemy...   

The context (comes with listening to the dialogue).

Newman: So it seems to a lot of women that they're still being dominated and excluded, to quote your words back to you.

Newman has raised the issue of the pay gap earlier. She now claims that women are still being dominated and excluded [did she mean caused by men? What else could she mean - by other women? Climate change?]. Newman also suggests that Peterson said as much in one of his books - which he didn't.

Peterson: It does seem that way. But multivariate analysis of the pay gap indicate that it doesn’t exist.

Note that Peterson acknowledges the pay gap, but is now answering Newman's augmented statement about it which includes, what Newman believes, is the reason for it - that men dominate and exclude women.

Newman: But that’s not true, is it? That 9 percent pay gap, that’s a gap between median hourly earnings between men and women. That exists.

Now Newman returns to the pay gap alone, having established that she believes there is a pay gap and men cause it.

Peterson: Yes. But there’s multiple reasons for that. One of them is gender, but that’s not the only reason.

Peterson is responding to Newman's claim - that there is a pay gap and men cause it.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by MeisterEckhart on Sep 13th, 2022 at 12:08pm

Frank wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:59am:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:53am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:16am:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:08am:
I stopped listening at: "Yes the gender pay gap exists, but..."

Stopped listening, eh! And you think you can take on Peterson!


Petereson: "Men...need to be told...men need help..."

Yes, I can take on Peterson.



Common prosperity, one-party state and government knows best,  print mo' money, jobs for all, refuted above, that not debate, 50 years ago is ancient history, freedom is horrible, Marxism is wonderful....ZZZzzzz......

You forgot TGD's, 'a disgrace to God and the creation.'

Now selling on ebay for 50 bucks as part of the 'Marxists say the Darnedest Things' series.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 13th, 2022 at 12:21pm

Frank wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 9:40am:
Newman: So it seems to a lot of women that they are still being dominated and excluded, to quote your words back to you.


OK... so male domination - a subjective experience of 'a lot of women'-  is a complex issue. 


Quote:
Peterson: It does seem that way. But multivariate analysis of the pay gap indicate that it doesn’t exist

Newman: But that’s not true, is it? That 9 percent pay gap, that’s a gap between median hourly earnings between men and women. That exists.

Peterson: Yes. But there’s multiple reasons for that. One of them is gender, but that’s not the only reason. If you’re a social scientist worth your salt, you never do a univariate analysis. You say women in aggregate are paid less than men. Okay. Well then we break its down by age; we break it down by occupation; we break it down by interest; we break it down by personality.


https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/psychology/jordan-petersons-channel-4-interview-cathy-newman-transcript/

The first 'it' doesn't exist refers to the 'it' which is in red.


ah ha...so frank claims "it" refers to the subjective experience of oppression, not the the gender pay gap on average.


Quote:
What does exist is the 9% gap (which was not the 'it' in the first line). That gap exists BUT NOT because of the 'it' but due to multiple reasons, only one of it is gender and NONE of it is the 'it', the domination and exclusion of women.


Ok, so both you and Peterson admit the gender pay gap on average exists, even if  Newman is barking up the wrong tree (ie, "male oppression").

So what are you going to do about the gender pay gap...and the black gap....?

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 13th, 2022 at 12:30pm

Frank wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:59am:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:53am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:16am:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:08am:
I stopped listening at: "Yes the gender pay gap exists, but..."

Stopped listening, eh! And you think you can take on Peterson!


Petereson: "Men...need to be told...men need help..."

Yes, I can take on Peterson.




Common prosperity, one-party state and government knows best,  print mo' money, jobs for all, refuted above, that not debate, 50 years ago is ancient history, freedom is horrible, Marxism is wonderful....ZZZzzzz......


Yes I would demolish Peterson in minutes, just as Meister can't confront Cicero's paradox; "for all to be free, all must submit to rule of law.

Peterson of course seems blissfully unaware of the effect of unconscious instinct on conscious thought, in humans - egregious, given his background in psychiatry.   

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by MeisterEckhart on Sep 13th, 2022 at 12:35pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 12:21pm:

Frank wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 9:40am:
Newman: So it seems to a lot of women that they are still being dominated and excluded, to quote your words back to you.


OK... so male domination - a subjective experience of 'a lot of women'-  is a complex issue. 

Yes. Newman uses weasel words expecting them to land a punch (deception, much?), to swing the argument towards the pay gap being caused by men, without committing herself to having to quote reliable data that would have proved her augmented point. If she'd had reliable data, she'd have used it here. She didn't. Her lust for blood had addled her mind.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Frank on Sep 13th, 2022 at 12:37pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 12:21pm:

Frank wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 9:40am:
Newman: So it seems to a lot of women that they are still being dominated and excluded, to quote your words back to you.


OK... so male domination - a subjective experience of 'a lot of women'-  is a complex issue. 


Quote:
Peterson: It does seem that way. But multivariate analysis of the pay gap indicate that it doesn’t exist.


Newman: But that’s not true, is it? That 9 percent pay gap, that’s a gap between median hourly earnings between men and women. That exists.

Peterson: Yes. But there’s multiple reasons for that. One of them is gender, but that’s not the only reason. If you’re a social scientist worth your salt, you never do a univariate analysis. You say women in aggregate are paid less than men. Okay. Well then we break its down by age; we break it down by occupation; we break it down by interest; we break it down by personality.



https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/psychology/jordan-petersons-channel-4-interview-cathy-newman-transcript/

The first 'it' doesn't exist refers to the 'it' which is in red.[/quote]

ah ha...so frank claims "it" refers to the subjective experience of oppression, not the the gender pay gap on average.


Quote:
What does exist is the 9% gap (which was not the 'it' in the first line). That gap exists BUT NOT because of the 'it' but due to multiple reasons, only one of it is gender and NONE of it is the 'it', the domination and exclusion of women.


Ok, so both you and Peterson admit the gender pay gap on average exists, even if  Newman is barking up the wrong tree (ie, "male oppression").

So what are you going to do about the gender pay gap...and the black gap....?
[/quote]


No, Great Sloppy Muddle, the pay gap exists but is not due solely or even mainly to gender, so it is not a 'gender pay gap'. Do try to be a bit discerning and pay attention to what is actually said  and not always rush to parrot your tired cliches and slogans.

All sorts of other pay gaps exist, none of them are due to a single variable like gender.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Gnads on Sep 13th, 2022 at 12:40pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 10:01am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 5:06pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 4:39pm:
Peterson's very first stupidity:

journo: " women earn less than men"

peterson: "no they dont"

journo: "The pay gap is 9 percent less on average"

peterson:Yes but there are multiple reasons for that..."

So he agreed there IS a pay gap..... contradicting his earlier statement....
 

That's not even close to the transcript.

Read it before you put words in his mouth.

https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/psychology/jordan-petersons-channel-4-interview-cathy-newman-transcript/


Read it? I listened to the video carefully.

Can you deny Peterson said: "YES, but....."?

Of course women CANNOT ever earn the same as men on average, because they have to take time off to bear and suckle babies.

One solution is to pay higher wages for child and age care workers,  who are largely female.


They don't "have to" do any such thing. They are free to choose whether they do that or not.

Some employers pay maternity leave others not...

they also get around that by employing them as casuals/part timers where many benefits of a full time job are not applicable.

So the issue is not about a gender pay gap - because there isn't one.

It's all about choices that affect hours worked which equates to less earned.

You don't get paid for not being there/not working.

2nd highlight - why is that? Is that discriminatory/ an equal opportunity employer?  ::)

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Frank on Sep 13th, 2022 at 12:45pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 12:30pm:

Frank wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:59am:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:53am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:16am:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:08am:
I stopped listening at: "Yes the gender pay gap exists, but..."

Stopped listening, eh! And you think you can take on Peterson!


Petereson: "Men...need to be told...men need help..."

Yes, I can take on Peterson.




Common prosperity, one-party state and government knows best,  print mo' money, jobs for all, refuted above, that not debate, 50 years ago is ancient history, freedom is horrible, Marxism is wonderful....ZZZzzzz......


Yes I would demolish Peterson in minutes, just as Meister can't confront Cicero's paradox; "for all to be free, all must submit to rule of law.

Peterson of course seems blissfully unaware of the effect of unconscious instinct on conscious thought, in humans - egregious, given his background in psychiatry.   


:D :D :D

Psittacism is not 'demolishing', conceited little Marxoid.


And what do you base your incredibly, eyewateringly stupid and overweening statement about his being unaware, a Harvard and Toronto professor of psychology and a practicing therapist for 20 years, of such basic terms as instinct and thought, terms you probably just googled and so are new to you.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 13th, 2022 at 12:45pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 12:08pm:
You forgot TGD's, 'a disgrace to God and the creation.';/quote]

War IS a disgrace to God and the creation, not undestood  by "man ..  an imbecile earthworm; depository of truth, yet a sewer of uncertainty and error; pride and refuse of the universe" (Pascal)

[quote]Now selling on ebay for 50 bucks as part of the 'Marxists say the Darnedest Things' series.


"from each according to abilty, to each according to need " ... need, which is NOT 'equality of outcome' as asserted by conservative frauds. .

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by MeisterEckhart on Sep 13th, 2022 at 12:50pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 10:01am:
Of course women CANNOT ever earn the same as men on average, because they have to take time off to bear and suckle babies.

I can intuit you haven't read the transcript nor listened to the dialogue.

Later on in the interview, Newman, in desperation, throws in the baby thing (who knows why - probably hoping Peterson would suggest it was a woman's duty to have children).

Newman: But why shouldn’t women have the right to choose not to have children or the right to choose those demanding careers?

Peterson: They do. They can, yeah, that’s fine.

Newman: But you’re saying that makes them unhappy, by and large.

Peterson: I’m saying that… No, I’m not saying that, and I actually haven’t said that so far in the program…


Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by MeisterEckhart on Sep 13th, 2022 at 12:53pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 12:45pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 12:08pm:
You forgot TGD's, 'a disgrace to God and the creation.';/quote]

War IS a disgrace to God and the creation, not undestood  by "man ..  an imbecile earthworm; depository of truth, yet a sewer of uncertainty and error; pride and refuse of the universe" (Pascal)

[quote]Now selling on ebay for 50 bucks as part of the 'Marxists say the Darnedest Things' series.


"from each according to abilty, to each according to need " ... need, which is NOT 'equality of outcome' as asserted by conservative frauds. .

Yes. I guess a CCP official needs a Lamborghini. A Chinese peasant in a rural village needs an ox and cart.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 13th, 2022 at 1:06pm

Frank wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 12:37pm:

the pay gap exists but is not due solely or even mainly to gender,


(note: edited format corrections in previous post)

"Not due solely", implying gender is ONE factor..

.which in part,  by definition is  
the gender pay gap
(because women must bear and suckle babies ...and it exists...


Quote:
so it is not a 'gender pay gap'.


Of course it is, regardless of co-existing non-gender causes of the gap; ever heard of logic?


Quote:
Do try to be a bit discerning and pay attention to what is actually said  and not always rush to parrot your tired cliches and slogans.


And yet you and peterson agree the gender pay gap exists...


Quote:
All sorts of other pay gaps exist, none of them are due to a single variable like gender.


Correct, but the GENDER pay gap also exists, which you and peterson both say exists.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 13th, 2022 at 1:11pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 12:53pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 12:45pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 12:08pm:
You forgot TGD's, 'a disgrace to God and the creation.';


War IS a disgrace to God and the creation, not undestood  by "man ..  an imbecile earthworm; depository of truth, yet a sewer of uncertainty and error; pride and refuse of the universe" (Pascal)


Quote:
Now selling on ebay for 50 bucks as part of the 'Marxists say the Darnedest Things' series.


"from each according to abilty, to each according to need " ... need, which is NOT 'equality of outcome' as asserted by conservative frauds. .


Yes. I guess a CCP official needs a Lamborghini. A Chinese peasant in a rural village needs an ox and cart.


a comment to be expected from  a "freedom" war monger, and  survival of the fittest "sewer of error" ...

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by MeisterEckhart on Sep 13th, 2022 at 1:18pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 1:11pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 12:53pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 12:45pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 12:08pm:
You forgot TGD's, 'a disgrace to God and the creation.';


War IS a disgrace to God and the creation, not undestood  by "man ..  an imbecile earthworm; depository of truth, yet a sewer of uncertainty and error; pride and refuse of the universe" (Pascal)


Quote:
Now selling on ebay for 50 bucks as part of the 'Marxists say the Darnedest Things' series.


"from each according to abilty, to each according to need " ... need, which is NOT 'equality of outcome' as asserted by conservative frauds. .


Yes. I guess a CCP official needs a Lamborghini. A Chinese peasant in a rural village needs an ox and cart.


a comment to be expected from  a "freedom" war monger ", and  survival of the fittest " sewer of error" ...

In the CCP should it be a struggle between survival of the most entitled and survival of the politically fittest (i.e. in brutality and the capacity to drink high-proof alcohol)?

I'm looking forward to the bloodbath that will directly follow the collapse of the CCP as they eat each other while attempting to extricate themselves from the rubble.


Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 13th, 2022 at 1:29pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 1:18pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 1:11pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 12:53pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 12:45pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 12:08pm:
You forgot TGD's, 'a disgrace to God and the creation.';


War IS a disgrace to God and the creation, not undestood  by "man ..  an imbecile earthworm; depository of truth, yet a sewer of uncertainty and error; pride and refuse of the universe" (Pascal)


Quote:
Now selling on ebay for 50 bucks as part of the 'Marxists say the Darnedest Things' series.


"from each according to abilty, to each according to need " ... need, which is NOT 'equality of outcome' as asserted by conservative frauds. .


Yes. I guess a CCP official needs a Lamborghini. A Chinese peasant in a rural village needs an ox and cart.


a comment to be expected from  a "freedom" war monger ", and  survival of the fittest " sewer of error" ...

In the CCP should it be a struggle between survival of the most entitled and survival of the politically fittest (i.e. in brutality and the capacity to drink high-proof alcohol)?

I'm looking forward to the bloodbath that will directly follow the collapse of the CCP as they eat each other while attempting to extricate themselves from the rubble.


Now you have turned into frauddiver; to be expected from the "sewer of the universe".

"From each according to ability, to each according to need"  is not bound by corrupt politicians' behaviour, it's a goal for economic relations between individuals. . 

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 13th, 2022 at 1:32pm
...

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 13th, 2022 at 1:32pm
....

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by MeisterEckhart on Sep 13th, 2022 at 1:41pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 1:29pm:

Quote:
In the CCP should it be a struggle between survival of the most entitled and survival of the politically fittest (i.e. in brutality and the capacity to drink high-proof alcohol)?

I'm looking forward to the bloodbath that will directly follow the collapse of the CCP as they eat each other while attempting to extricate themselves from the rubble.


Now you have turned into frauddiver; to be expected from the "sewer of the universe".

"From each according to ability, to each according to need"  is not bound by corrupt politicians' behaviour, it's a goal for economic relations between individuals. . 

Ah, a "sewer of the universe". Yes, where rural Chinese people are forced to live - sewers of the universe pretty well describes it.

And without the ability or capacity for brutal Machiavellianism to climb the CCP's political ladder, a Chinese citizen has little to no chance of climbing out of that sewer.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Gnads on Sep 13th, 2022 at 2:37pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:08am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:14pm:
His calm & considered style is what annoys leftist ideologues like you & lefty journalists like Newman.


I was exasperated by Peterson's woolly thinking before the quoted exchange:

Newman: "there is a crisis of masculinity? what do you do about it?"

Perterson: you tell ...you help people  to understand why it's necessary to grow up..to get their act together (ok, in his psychiatrist mode) "it's more like a delineation of destiny that makes life worth living.


(Apart from the waffle) note: "you need to tell ...to help people" ....so much for the rugged individual who has to make his own success....


Quote:
You want him to be angry & abusive so play the oppressive white male patriarchy card.


No I want him to show some understanding of the human condition with its  conflict between unconscious instinct and conscious thought.


Quote:
Yes your lefty feminists were parroting the same mantra & Petersen explained to Newman that they were wrong just as she was ...... and you are.


As Mothra noted, feminsts have been saying the same thing as peterson for ages; Peterson just likes to cloud the issue. Fact is women must bear and suckle children
(...which might offend some extreme feminists...), which therefor must interfere with career opportunities on average.



Quote:
Like he said, he chooses his words very very carefully .....


and struggles to put a sensible argument , as outlined above :  "tell... help...." (men how to live full lives)


Quote:
And he has people like you for breakfast on a regular basis.


Pass.I haven't met him.


Quote:
That interview had to be the worst Newman has ever done and I bet she looks back on that & cringes.


Addressed above: he has me cringing.


Quote:
Ahhhhhhhh gotcha! He certainly did ..... and she admitted it.


Care to detail your point? I stopped listening at: "Yes the gender pay gap exists, but..."
[/quote]

So you're as stupid as Newman?

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Gnads on Sep 13th, 2022 at 2:42pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:35am:

Frank wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:53pm:
(Peterson) does explain his position very clearly - male/female differences in pay, life choices, etc are multi-variant equations and questions.


Clear as mud. Why not just say women have to bear and suckle children, and society's assistance might be necessary in a world where many women are single mothers, and women increasingly want to have independent lifestyles.   


Quote:
She doesn't and only assumes that equality of outcome is an unchallengeable starting point in such a discussion.


'Equality of outcome' is a RW ruse, which the Right confuse with 'equality of opportunity". to avoid establishment of above-poverty participation by all.
Newson herself probably  doesn't understand the implications of this in regard to women's economic outcomes in society 

[quote] It evidently isn't but her mind is befogged by the ideology and she doesn't have the intelligence and candour to perceive that multi-variant aspect of this and most other such questions.


The Right's understanding of "equality of outcome" is a shibboleth, a ruse as noted above.   


Quote:
It is quite amusing to watch.


I would say excruciating....
[/quote]


Women have equal opportunity & have for ages.

In fact they now have more than equal opportunity & you know it. Preferential job selection & quota levels.

All you are prattling are dated victimhood excuses.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Gnads on Sep 13th, 2022 at 2:46pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 12:30pm:

Frank wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:59am:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:53am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:16am:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:08am:
I stopped listening at: "Yes the gender pay gap exists, but..."

Stopped listening, eh! And you think you can take on Peterson!


Petereson: "Men...need to be told...men need help..."

Yes, I can take on Peterson.




Common prosperity, one-party state and government knows best,  print mo' money, jobs for all, refuted above, that not debate, 50 years ago is ancient history, freedom is horrible, Marxism is wonderful....ZZZzzzz......


Yes I would demolish Peterson in minutes, just as Meister can't confront Cicero's paradox; "for all to be free, all must submit to rule of law.

Peterson of course seems blissfully unaware of the effect of unconscious instinct on conscious thought, in humans - egregious, given his background in psychiatry.   


Horseshyte.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 13th, 2022 at 4:43pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 1:41pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 1:29pm:

Quote:
In the CCP should it be a struggle between survival of the most entitled and survival of the politically fittest (i.e. in brutality and the capacity to drink high-proof alcohol)?

I'm looking forward to the bloodbath that will directly follow the collapse of the CCP as they eat each other while attempting to extricate themselves from the rubble.


Now you have turned into frauddiver; to be expected from the "sewer of the universe".

"From each according to ability, to each according to need"  is not bound by corrupt politicians' behaviour, it's a goal for economic relations between individuals. . 

Ah, a "sewer of the universe". Yes, where rural Chinese people are forced to live - sewers of the universe pretty well describes it.

And without the ability or capacity for brutal Machiavellianism to climb the CCP's political ladder, a Chinese citizen has little to no chance of climbing out of that sewer.


No. Pascal is referring to YOU ...ouch; you blind "freedom" war-monger, and survival of the fittest free-marketeer.

Blind and fraudulent - "a sewer of error, and refuse of the universe".

Case closed. 

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 13th, 2022 at 4:46pm

Gnads wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 2:42pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:35am:

Frank wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:53pm:
(Peterson) does explain his position very clearly - male/female differences in pay, life choices, etc are multi-variant equations and questions.


Clear as mud. Why not just say women have to bear and suckle children, and society's assistance might be necessary in a world where many women are single mothers, and women increasingly want to have independent lifestyles.   


Quote:
She doesn't and only assumes that equality of outcome is an unchallengeable starting point in such a discussion.


'Equality of outcome' is a RW ruse, which the Right confuse with 'equality of opportunity". to avoid establishment of above-poverty participation by all.
Newson herself probably  doesn't understand the implications of this in regard to women's economic outcomes in society 

[quote] It evidently isn't but her mind is befogged by the ideology and she doesn't have the intelligence and candour to perceive that multi-variant aspect of this and most other such questions.


The Right's understanding of "equality of outcome" is a shibboleth, a ruse as noted above.   

[quote]It is quite amusing to watch.


I would say excruciating....
[/quote]


Women have equal opportunity & have for ages.[/quote]

Nonsense. It's impossible, if you have to bear and suckle  babies.


Quote:
In fact they now have more than equal opportunity & you know it. Preferential job selection & quota levels.

All you are prattling are dated victimhood excuses.


refuted above.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 13th, 2022 at 4:51pm

Gnads wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 2:46pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 12:30pm:

Frank wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:59am:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:53am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:16am:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:08am:
I stopped listening at: "Yes the gender pay gap exists, but..."

Stopped listening, eh! And you think you can take on Peterson!


Petereson: "Men...need to be told...men need help..."

Yes, I can take on Peterson.




Common prosperity, one-party state and government knows best,  print mo' money, jobs for all, refuted above, that not debate, 50 years ago is ancient history, freedom is horrible, Marxism is wonderful....ZZZzzzz......


Yes I would demolish Peterson in minutes, just as Meister can't confront Cicero's paradox; "for all to be free, all must submit to rule of law.

Peterson of course seems blissfully unaware of the effect of unconscious instinct on conscious thought, in humans - egregious, given his background in psychiatry.   


Horseshyte.


er..that's not debate....feel free to refute Cicero, Meister is studiously avoiding the paradox. 

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Frank on Sep 13th, 2022 at 4:56pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 1:06pm:

Frank wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 12:37pm:

the pay gap exists but is not due solely or even mainly to gender,


(note: edited format corrections in previous post)

"Not due solely", implying gender is ONE factor..

.which in part,  by definition is  
the gender pay gap
(because women must bear and suckle babies ...and it exists...


Quote:
so it is not a 'gender pay gap'.


Of course it is, regardless of co-existing non-gender causes of the gap; ever heard of logic?



Why single out gender if other causes - far more influential - also exist? Ever heard of propaganda?


Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 13th, 2022 at 5:26pm

Frank wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 4:56pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 1:06pm:

Frank wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 12:37pm:

the pay gap exists but is not due solely or even mainly to gender,


(note: edited format corrections in previous post)

"Not due solely", implying gender is ONE factor..

.which in part,  by definition is  
the gender pay gap
(because women must bear and suckle babies ...and it exists...


Quote:
so it is not a 'gender pay gap'.


Of course it is, regardless of co-existing non-gender causes of the gap; ever heard of logic?



Why single out gender if other causes - far more influential - also exist? Ever heard of propaganda?


I would say the burden of bearing and suckling children  is quite influential, in determining women's economic circumstances.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by MeisterEckhart on Sep 13th, 2022 at 5:29pm

Frank wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 4:56pm:
Ever heard of propaganda?

Heard of it? He trekked through it.

Funny how the bamboo thickets looked bigger than the mountains he climbed there, but.

The pictures must've been taken from bad angles.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 13th, 2022 at 5:43pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 5:29pm:

Frank wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 4:56pm:
Ever heard of propaganda?

Heard of it? He trekked through it.


The reality of the burden of bearing and suckling children, without male or societal support,  is not 'propaganda, it's fact.

Feel free to refute that point, since you have given up on the Cicero paradox.


Quote:
Funny how the bamboo thickets looked bigger than the mountains he climbed there, but.

The pictures must've been taken from bad angles.


Fraudulent non-debating narrative, as expected.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by MeisterEckhart on Sep 13th, 2022 at 5:51pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 5:43pm:
Fraudulent non-debating narrative, as expected.

Aww, boo hoo.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Frank on Sep 13th, 2022 at 5:53pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 5:26pm:

Frank wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 4:56pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 1:06pm:

Frank wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 12:37pm:

the pay gap exists but is not due solely or even mainly to gender,


(note: edited format corrections in previous post)

"Not due solely", implying gender is ONE factor..

.which in part,  by definition is  
the gender pay gap
(because women must bear and suckle babies ...and it exists...


Quote:
so it is not a 'gender pay gap'.


Of course it is, regardless of co-existing non-gender causes of the gap; ever heard of logic?



Why single out gender if other causes - far more influential - also exist? Ever heard of propaganda?


I would say the burden of bearing and suckling children  is quite influential, in determining women's economic circumstances.



There is a MASSIVE gender pay gap between you and Gina Reinhhardt - and she brought up 4 kiddies.

Please explain in terms of gender and child rearing.  Don't stray from those two variants.





Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by freediver on Sep 13th, 2022 at 6:07pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 8:13am:

freediver wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 6:35am:

Quote:
It is not a state.


According to Muslims, it naturally is. That is why Muslims start pushing for a religious state as soon as they are in a position to do so. Muhammad was a political leader, just as much as a religious one, and his movement is just as political as it is religious.

You are referring to an Islamic state (a religious state), not a state called Islam.


Islam does not recognise the distinction between state and religion. A religious state is as natural to Islam as people gathering at a church on Sunday morning is to Christianity. You are projecting western values onto Islam. You see it is just a religion in the conventional sense, but that does not make it so.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by MeisterEckhart on Sep 13th, 2022 at 6:27pm

freediver wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 6:07pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 8:13am:

freediver wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 6:35am:

Quote:
It is not a state.


According to Muslims, it naturally is. That is why Muslims start pushing for a religious state as soon as they are in a position to do so. Muhammad was a political leader, just as much as a religious one, and his movement is just as political as it is religious.

You are referring to an Islamic state (a religious state), not a state called Islam.


Islam does not recognise the distinction between state and religion. A religious state is as natural to Islam as people gathering at a church on Sunday morning is to Christianity. You are projecting western values onto Islam. You see it is just a religion in the conventional sense, but that does not make it so.

Yes, I know that Islam does not recognise the distinction between state and religion; the Holy Roman Empire was the closest approximation (as a Christian supra-state) to an Islamic supra-state.

It's meaningless, even to Muslims, to name any geographical area, Islam, as it would be meaningless to name a state secular.


Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 13th, 2022 at 10:55pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 5:43pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 5:29pm:

Frank wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 4:56pm:
Ever heard of propaganda?

Heard of it? He trekked through it.


The reality of the burden of bearing and suckling children, without male or societal support,  is not 'propaganda, it's fact.

Feel free to refute that point, since you have given up on the Cicero paradox.


Quote:
Funny how the bamboo thickets looked bigger than the mountains he climbed there, but.

The pictures must've been taken from bad angles.


Fraudulent non-debating narrative, as expected.


So women should be paid extra for their child bearing duties and choices? They have been supported by men for generations, sharing in all the proceeds of often very hard and dangerous work for the man...and the state has taken on the burden as well...

They are already paid for it and always have been....

What is your argument?

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 13th, 2022 at 10:59pm

freediver wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 6:07pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 8:13am:

freediver wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 6:35am:

Quote:
It is not a state.


According to Muslims, it naturally is. That is why Muslims start pushing for a religious state as soon as they are in a position to do so. Muhammad was a political leader, just as much as a religious one, and his movement is just as political as it is religious.

You are referring to an Islamic state (a religious state), not a state called Islam.


Islam does not recognise the distinction between state and religion. A religious state is as natural to Islam as people gathering at a church on Sunday morning is to Christianity. You are projecting western values onto Islam. You see it is just a religion in the conventional sense, but that does not make it so.


Preeee-cisely!  I've been telling yez for ages that in CT studies Islamism (the most virulent Islam manifestation) views Islam as a "state without borders".

The Catholic church etc do as well - but they accept secular government and not religious government.

There lies the very real difference between Islam and most other religions.

How would you like it if our courts found you guilty on the premise that it didn't matter if you were or not, since God would sort it all out for you in Heaven in the event of a mistake?

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 14th, 2022 at 10:59am

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 5:51pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 5:43pm:
Fraudulent non-debating narrative, as expected.

Aww, boo hoo.


Your concession on the 2 debates (gender, Cicero) accepted.




Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by MeisterEckhart on Sep 14th, 2022 at 11:01am

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 14th, 2022 at 10:59am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 5:51pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 5:43pm:
Fraudulent non-debating narrative, as expected.

Aww, boo hoo.


Your concession on the 2 debates (gender, Cicero) accepted.

No. It's just an observation that you're likely an old and lonely manchild.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 14th, 2022 at 11:07am

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 10:55pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 5:43pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 5:29pm:

Frank wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 4:56pm:
Ever heard of propaganda?

Heard of it? He trekked through it.


The reality of the burden of bearing and suckling children, without male or societal support,  is not 'propaganda, it's fact.

Feel free to refute that point, since you have given up on the Cicero paradox.


Quote:
Funny how the bamboo thickets looked bigger than the mountains he climbed there, but.

The pictures must've been taken from bad angles.


Fraudulent non-debating narrative, as expected.


So women should be paid extra for their child bearing duties and choices?


Child bearing and sucklng isn't a choice in the macro sense,


Quote:
They have been supported by men for generations, sharing in all the proceeds of often very hard and dangerous work for the man...and the state has taken on the burden as well...


Yet as a group (50% of the population), they are poorer than men,


Quote:
They are already paid for it and always have been....


Refuted above.


Quote:
What is your argument?


That gendered employment roles like child and age care should be paid more.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 14th, 2022 at 1:18pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 14th, 2022 at 10:59am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 5:51pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 5:43pm:
Fraudulent non-debating narrative, as expected.

Aww, boo hoo.


Your concession on the 2 debates (gender, Cicero) accepted.


Oooh - gender pay gap! W-ell!

… and now on the Grappler Morning show – our promised re-working of the classic 'gender wage gap' in an attempt to intrude some reality into the lives of those perpetually and professionally dumbed by ideology:-

https://www.google.com/search?q=australia+how+many+hours+per+week+do+men+work&oq...
https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/labour/earnings-and-working-conditions/average...


Women worked 36.4 hours pw on average, earned $1672.45

Average working weeks is 37.5 hours – so we add 1.1 hours worth to women's overall income

= $1723 for a 37.5 hour week.

Men worked 41 hours pw on average, earned $1955.45

At 37.5 hour average week – we must take away 3.5 hours pay to attain equity.

Ergo - $1955.45 - $166.92 = $1788.53 for a 37.5 hour week...

..then we must remove the half time penalty component from the extra 3.5 hours = 3.5 x $23.85 = $83.48.

Ergo - for a 37.5 hour week men would be paid  $1788.53 - $83.48 =  $1705.05.

ERGO:-  For an ordinary 37.5 hour week women are paid  $18 pw more than men, not including additions for conditions such as wet, weather, dust, remoteness, underground, height and so forth.


Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 14th, 2022 at 3:48pm

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 14th, 2022 at 1:18pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 14th, 2022 at 10:59am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 5:51pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 5:43pm:
Fraudulent non-debating narrative, as expected.

Aww, boo hoo.


Your concession on the 2 debates (gender, Cicero) accepted.


Oooh - gender pay gap! W-ell!

… and now on the Grappler Morning show – our promised re-working of the classic 'gender wage gap' in an attempt to intrude some reality into the lives of those perpetually and professionally dumbed by ideology:-

https://www.google.com/search?q=australia+how+many+hours+per+week+do+men+work&oq...
https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/labour/earnings-and-working-conditions/average...


Women worked 36.4 hours pw on average, earned $1672.45

Average working weeks is 37.5 hours – so we add 1.1 hours worth to women's overall income

= $1723 for a 37.5 hour week.

Men worked 41 hours pw on average, earned $1955.45

At 37.5 hour average week – we must take away 3.5 hours pay to attain equity.

Ergo - $1955.45 - $166.92 = $1788.53 for a 37.5 hour week...

..then we must remove the half time penalty component from the extra 3.5 hours = 3.5 x $23.85 = $83.48.

Ergo - for a 37.5 hour week men would be paid  $1788.53 - $83.48 =  $1705.05.

ERGO:-  For an ordinary 37.5 hour week women are paid  $18 pw more than men, not including additions for conditions such as wet, weather, dust, remoteness, underground, height and so forth.


Pity about all your efforts there, your stats are irrelevent.

Just so you know: 50% of the population by gender earn c 10% less (in total)  than the other 50% of the population., due to the requirements of bearing, and suckling children. 

aka "the gender pay gap".      

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 14th, 2022 at 5:29pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 14th, 2022 at 11:07am:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 10:55pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 5:43pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 5:29pm:

Frank wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 4:56pm:
Ever heard of propaganda?

Heard of it? He trekked through it.


The reality of the burden of bearing and suckling children, without male or societal support,  is not 'propaganda, it's fact.

Feel free to refute that point, since you have given up on the Cicero paradox.


Quote:
Funny how the bamboo thickets looked bigger than the mountains he climbed there, but.

The pictures must've been taken from bad angles.


Fraudulent non-debating narrative, as expected.


So women should be paid extra for their child bearing duties and choices?


Child bearing and sucklng isn't a choice in the macro sense,

[quote]They have been supported by men for generations, sharing in all the proceeds of often very hard and dangerous work for the man...and the state has taken on the burden as well...


Yet as a group (50% of the population), they are poorer than men,


Quote:
They are already paid for it and always have been....


Refuted above.


Quote:
What is your argument?


That gendered employment roles like child and age care should be paid more.
[/quote]

So that's your entire premise?

Already in train, and under discussion between unions, governments and employers.... why are you bothering?  The flow-on economic effects will be endless and potentially disastrous for many Mandatory Dual Income Families (MADIFs), and will impose a mighty extra burden on the budget that it can ill afford at this time.

It's time for governments to get out of their social science mode and get into  doing they things they are paid for - fixing the hospitals, roads, and infrastructure... the rest should be left to market forces, with additional oversight and regulation for the aged care sector at least....

The more you pay people the more it costs and the more it costs the more you have to pay people to get by - it's a never-ending cycle....

You speak as if it is a finite issue that will be magically resolved by giving the girls more money so as to further unbalance the current income levels clearly favouring women.

In every sector there are those who get less and those who get more... between different sectors there are some who get less and some who get more.... you will never change that, but what your thinking style can do is create further problems for others by exclusion and disadvantage to them.

You cannot continue to rob Peter to pay Paula... and when you raise incomes for childcare workers, you create pressure on both Peter and his wife Petra to demand higher income levels to cater for increased costs, or you create a truly insane policy of a government to fund it near totally, meaning those with children get a better deal .... and so it goes on and on...

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Gnads on Sep 14th, 2022 at 6:19pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 4:46pm:

Gnads wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 2:42pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:35am:

Frank wrote on Sep 12th, 2022 at 6:53pm:
(Peterson) does explain his position very clearly - male/female differences in pay, life choices, etc are multi-variant equations and questions.


Clear as mud. Why not just say women have to bear and suckle children, and society's assistance might be necessary in a world where many women are single mothers, and women increasingly want to have independent lifestyles.   


Quote:
She doesn't and only assumes that equality of outcome is an unchallengeable starting point in such a discussion.


'Equality of outcome' is a RW ruse, which the Right confuse with 'equality of opportunity". to avoid establishment of above-poverty participation by all.
Newson herself probably  doesn't understand the implications of this in regard to women's economic outcomes in society 

[quote] It evidently isn't but her mind is befogged by the ideology and she doesn't have the intelligence and candour to perceive that multi-variant aspect of this and most other such questions.


The Right's understanding of "equality of outcome" is a shibboleth, a ruse as noted above.   

[quote]It is quite amusing to watch.


I would say excruciating....



Women have equal opportunity & have for ages.[/quote]

Nonsense. It's impossible, if you have to bear and suckle  babies.


Quote:
In fact they now have more than equal opportunity & you know it. Preferential job selection & quota levels.

All you are prattling are dated victimhood excuses.


refuted above.
[/quote]

Phark you're dense...... they don't have to.. they have a choice... they've had it since 1950.

Does "the Pill" .... ring any bells?

Your refutations are dated  meaningless nothings.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Gnads on Sep 14th, 2022 at 6:25pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 5:26pm:

Frank wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 4:56pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 1:06pm:

Frank wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 12:37pm:

the pay gap exists but is not due solely or even mainly to gender,


(note: edited format corrections in previous post)

"Not due solely", implying gender is ONE factor..

.which in part,  by definition is  
the gender pay gap
(because women must bear and suckle babies ...and it exists...


Quote:
so it is not a 'gender pay gap'.


Of course it is, regardless of co-existing non-gender causes of the gap; ever heard of logic?



Why single out gender if other causes - far more influential - also exist? Ever heard of propaganda?


I would say the burden of bearing and suckling children  is quite influential, in determining women's economic circumstances.


;D Usually they're not on their own when it comes to childbirth & rearing.

What about all the women that choose not to breast feed? ... yes choose not to .... not can't.

There are many ..... that don't suckle.

So how many more variables do you want to bring in?

You're barking up a tree without bark.

You're as painfully repetitious with the "bearing & suckling" as you are with the CDEP.  ::)

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Gnads on Sep 14th, 2022 at 6:28pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 5:43pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 5:29pm:

Frank wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 4:56pm:
Ever heard of propaganda?

Heard of it? He trekked through it.


The reality of the burden of bearing and suckling children, without male or societal support,  is not 'propaganda, it's fact.

Feel free to refute that point, since you have given up on the Cicero paradox.


Quote:
Funny how the bamboo thickets looked bigger than the mountains he climbed there, but.

The pictures must've been taken from bad angles.


Fraudulent non-debating narrative, as expected.


;D now you throw in another variable into the multifaceted variables & analysis that says the gender pay gap doesn't "really" exist.

Are your feet hurting yet?

You've shot yourself in both.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Gnads on Sep 14th, 2022 at 6:36pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 14th, 2022 at 3:48pm:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 14th, 2022 at 1:18pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 14th, 2022 at 10:59am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 5:51pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 5:43pm:
Fraudulent non-debating narrative, as expected.

Aww, boo hoo.


Your concession on the 2 debates (gender, Cicero) accepted.


Oooh - gender pay gap! W-ell!

… and now on the Grappler Morning show – our promised re-working of the classic 'gender wage gap' in an attempt to intrude some reality into the lives of those perpetually and professionally dumbed by ideology:-

https://www.google.com/search?q=australia+how+many+hours+per+week+do+men+work&oq...
https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/labour/earnings-and-working-conditions/average...


Women worked 36.4 hours pw on average, earned $1672.45

Average working weeks is 37.5 hours – so we add 1.1 hours worth to women's overall income

= $1723 for a 37.5 hour week.

Men worked 41 hours pw on average, earned $1955.45

At 37.5 hour average week – we must take away 3.5 hours pay to attain equity.

Ergo - $1955.45 - $166.92 = $1788.53 for a 37.5 hour week...

..then we must remove the half time penalty component from the extra 3.5 hours = 3.5 x $23.85 = $83.48.

Ergo - for a 37.5 hour week men would be paid  $1788.53 - $83.48 =  $1705.05.

ERGO:-  For an ordinary 37.5 hour week women are paid  $18 pw more than men, not including additions for conditions such as wet, weather, dust, remoteness, underground, height and so forth.


Pity about all your efforts there, your stats are irrelevent.

Just so you know: 50% of the population by gender earn c 10% less (in total)  than the other 50% of the population., due to the requirements of bearing, and suckling children. 

aka "the gender pay gap".      


Bullshyte

Statistical evidence could be tattooed on your forehead & you would still parrot the bs leftist radical feminist dogma.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Captain Caveman on Sep 15th, 2022 at 10:21am

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 14th, 2022 at 11:07am:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 10:55pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 5:43pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 5:29pm:

Frank wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 4:56pm:
Ever heard of propaganda?

Heard of it? He trekked through it.


The reality of the burden of bearing and suckling children, without male or societal support,  is not 'propaganda, it's fact.

Feel free to refute that point, since you have given up on the Cicero paradox.


Quote:
Funny how the bamboo thickets looked bigger than the mountains he climbed there, but.

The pictures must've been taken from bad angles.


Fraudulent non-debating narrative, as expected.


So women should be paid extra for their child bearing duties and choices?


Child bearing and sucklng isn't a choice in the macro sense,

[quote]They have been supported by men for generations, sharing in all the proceeds of often very hard and dangerous work for the man...and the state has taken on the burden as well...


Yet as a group (50% of the population), they are poorer than men,


Quote:
They are already paid for it and always have been....


Refuted above.


Quote:
What is your argument?


That gendered employment roles like child and age care should be paid more.
[/quote]



Would you be prepared to strip politicians of their rediculous pensions to make up the increase?
Or are you expecting to fleece more from the workers and keep dole bludgers paying $1 a day (cause they need child care so they can live the life).

Who's gonna cough up the coin?
Or you just gonna print more?

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Captain Caveman on Sep 15th, 2022 at 10:22am
Click

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Captain Caveman on Sep 15th, 2022 at 10:22am
Click

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 15th, 2022 at 10:56am

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 14th, 2022 at 5:29pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 14th, 2022 at 11:07am:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 10:55pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 5:43pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 5:29pm:

Frank wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 4:56pm:
Ever heard of propaganda?

Heard of it? He trekked through it.


The reality of the burden of bearing and suckling children, without male or societal support,  is not 'propaganda, it's fact.

Feel free to refute that point, since you have given up on the Cicero paradox.


Quote:
Funny how the bamboo thickets looked bigger than the mountains he climbed there, but.

The pictures must've been taken from bad angles.


Fraudulent non-debating narrative, as expected.


So women should be paid extra for their child bearing duties and choices?


Child bearing and sucklng isn't a choice in the macro sense,

[quote]They have been supported by men for generations, sharing in all the proceeds of often very hard and dangerous work for the man...and the state has taken on the burden as well...


Yet as a group (50% of the population), they are poorer than men,

[quote]They are already paid for it and always have been....


Refuted above.


Quote:
What is your argument?


That gendered employment roles like child and age care should be paid more.
[/quote]

So that's your entire premise?[/quote]

No, that's just one policy coming out of the recent jobs summit.


Quote:
Already in train, and under discussion between unions, governments and employers.... why are you bothering?


Agreed, as noted above.  I'm bothering because the issue shows the limits of wage determination in market economies; government must be able to intervene in wage determination.


Quote:
The flow-on economic effects will be endless and potentially disastrous for many Mandatory Dual Income Families (MADIFs), and will impose a mighty extra burden on the budget that it can ill afford at this time.


Just as I thought, your entire objection to wage justice for child and age care workers comes down to entirely obsolete  concerns about the government budget

Note:unlike you and me, governments with currency-issuing capacity  don't HAVE to balance their budgets, they have to maximize efficient mobilization of the nation's resources (including age and child care workers). which includes overseeing resource mobilization in the self-interested, profit-seeking private sector. 


Quote:
It's time for governments to get out of their social science mode and get into  doing they things they are paid for - fixing the hospitals, roads, and infrastructure, the rest should be left to market forces,


Refuted above....'market forces'  value the CEO of CocaCola at multiples the value of a child care worker, when the reverse should be the case, in terms of harm versus good achieved for the community. 


Quote:
with additional oversight and regulation for the aged care sector at least....


No way around it; the numbers of workers and rates of pay in the age care sector have to be increased,  funded by government.


Quote:
The more you pay people the more it costs
 
 ...costs the currency-issuing government who doesn't have to balance its budget..


Quote:
and the more it costs the more you have to pay people to get by - it's a never-ending cycle....


Wrong; higher wages (paid by government) makes it easier for people to get by....(assuming workers are available for govt. to employ).


Quote:
You speak as if it is a finite issue that will be magically resolved by giving the girls more money so as to further unbalance the current income levels clearly favouring women.


well certainly I would be lowering female - and male - CEO wages.....they are at absurd levels driven by shareholder greed.


Quote:
In every sector there are those who get less and those who get more... between different sectors there are some who get less and some who get more.... you will never change that, but what your thinking style can do is create further problems for others by exclusion and disadvantage to them.


Addressed and refuted above. In this case, your market forces dogma is the cause of your typical GIGO argumention.......


Quote:
You cannot continue to rob Peter to pay Paula... and when you raise incomes for childcare workers, you create pressure on both Peter and his wife Petra to demand higher income levels to cater for increased costs, or you create a truly insane policy of a government to fund it near totally, meaning those with children get a better deal .... and so it goes on and on...


Like I said, GIGO......

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 15th, 2022 at 11:15am

Captain Caveman wrote on Sep 15th, 2022 at 10:21am:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 14th, 2022 at 11:07am:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 10:55pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 5:43pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 5:29pm:

Frank wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 4:56pm:
Ever heard of propaganda?

Heard of it? He trekked through it.


The reality of the burden of bearing and suckling children, without male or societal support,  is not 'propaganda, it's fact.

Feel free to refute that point, since you have given up on the Cicero paradox.


Quote:
Funny how the bamboo thickets looked bigger than the mountains he climbed there, but.

The pictures must've been taken from bad angles.


Fraudulent non-debating narrative, as expected.


So women should be paid extra for their child bearing duties and choices?


Child bearing and sucklng isn't a choice in the macro sense,

[quote]They have been supported by men for generations, sharing in all the proceeds of often very hard and dangerous work for the man...and the state has taken on the burden as well...


Yet as a group (50% of the population), they are poorer than men,

[quote]They are already paid for it and always have been....


Refuted above.


Quote:
What is your argument?


That gendered employment roles like child and age care should be paid more.
[/quote]



Would you be prepared to strip politicians of their rediculous pensions to make up the increase?
Or are you expecting to fleece more from the workers and keep dole bludgers paying $1 a day (cause they need child care so they can live the life).

Who's gonna cough up the coin?
Or you just gonna print more? [/quote]

All explained in #288.

It's time to grow past your caveman economics.....

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 15th, 2022 at 11:23am

Gnads wrote on Sep 14th, 2022 at 6:36pm:
Bullshyte

Statistical evidence could be tattooed on your forehead & you would still parrot the bs leftist radical feminist dogma.


https://www.wgea.gov.au/the-gender-pay-gap

What it is:
The gender pay gap measures the difference between the average earnings of women and men in the workforce. The gender pay gap is an internationally established measure of women’s position in the economy in comparison to men. The gender pay gap is the result of the social and economic factors that combine to reduce women’s earning capacity over their lifetime.


I accept your concession.



Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 15th, 2022 at 12:32pm
..

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Gnads on Sep 15th, 2022 at 6:13pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 15th, 2022 at 11:23am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 14th, 2022 at 6:36pm:
Bullshyte

Statistical evidence could be tattooed on your forehead & you would still parrot the bs leftist radical feminist dogma.


https://www.wgea.gov.au/the-gender-pay-gap

What it is:
The gender pay gap measures the difference between the average earnings of women and men in the workforce. The gender pay gap is an internationally established measure of women’s position in the economy in comparison to men. The gender pay gap is the result of the social and economic factors that combine to reduce women’s earning capacity over their lifetime.


I accept your concession.



What social & economic factors?

They are not forced to bear & suckle children.

They are paid the same rates of pay.

How that's worded is indicating a comparison of a working lifetime of equal lengths to men.

And if the choose they can do that too

Their earning capacity would not be reduced then would it?

Are they going to all be single at the end of their working lives?

If not & they are partnered either as a hetrosexual or a homosexual do not their partners support them & share everything?

What that statement does is generalises & implies that all women choose to bear/suckle children that takes them out of the workforce & they don't earn...... it's not true.

What about the all the factors that can reduce any genders earning capacity throughout a life time?

Sickness, accident, disability, death of a partner, redundancy, termination, unemployment etc etc etc.

It does not change the fact that all it's about is for women to be paid or paid more for not working because they choose to have children, not to work overtime, not work shift work, not work weekends, not to work dangerous jobs, not to work FIFO, not to do trade apprenticeships,,,,,,

the list of reasons why they may earn less goes on & on.

And it's in the majority... choice....... not discrimination.


Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 15th, 2022 at 6:55pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 15th, 2022 at 11:23am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 14th, 2022 at 6:36pm:
Bullshyte

Statistical evidence could be tattooed on your forehead & you would still parrot the bs leftist radical feminist dogma.


https://www.wgea.gov.au/the-gender-pay-gap

What it is:
The gender pay gap measures the difference between the average earnings of women and men in the workforce. The gender pay gap is an internationally established measure of women’s position in the economy in comparison to men. The gender pay gap is the result of the social and economic factors that combine to reduce women’s earning capacity over their lifetime.


I accept your concession.



So when women average 36.4 hours pw and men 41, you just ignore that in calculating any difference?

Fine.... that's why I'm the professor and you are the drone...

The social and economic factors are that women work less and in areas of work that do not attract higher rates for conditions and sheer labour...........

When you can guarantee me anyone having a guaranteed income over a lifetime while taking on all their personal choices in life, I'm ready to listen...

I'll take two years off for a trip to Kathmandu and a meditation tour of Tibet and see how that would affects my lifetime income... I can just see it now...

"Look, Mr Employer... because I had a gap in earnings for two years, I now need to be paid more to make up my lifetime income... why can't you see that?"

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Captain Caveman on Sep 16th, 2022 at 1:58am

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 15th, 2022 at 11:15am:

Captain Caveman wrote on Sep 15th, 2022 at 10:21am:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 14th, 2022 at 11:07am:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 10:55pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 5:43pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 5:29pm:

Frank wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 4:56pm:
Ever heard of propaganda?

Heard of it? He trekked through it.


The reality of the burden of bearing and suckling children, without male or societal support,  is not 'propaganda, it's fact.

Feel free to refute that point, since you have given up on the Cicero paradox.


Quote:
Funny how the bamboo thickets looked bigger than the mountains he climbed there, but.

The pictures must've been taken from bad angles.


Fraudulent non-debating narrative, as expected.


So women should be paid extra for their child bearing duties and choices?


Child bearing and sucklng isn't a choice in the macro sense,

[quote]They have been supported by men for generations, sharing in all the proceeds of often very hard and dangerous work for the man...and the state has taken on the burden as well...


Yet as a group (50% of the population), they are poorer than men,

[quote]They are already paid for it and always have been....


Refuted above.

[quote]What is your argument?


That gendered employment roles like child and age care should be paid more.
[/quote]



Would you be prepared to strip politicians of their rediculous pensions to make up the increase?
Or are you expecting to fleece more from the workers and keep dole bludgers paying $1 a day (cause they need child care so they can live the life).

Who's gonna cough up the coin?
Or you just gonna print more? [/quote]

All explained in #288.

It's time to grow past your caveman economics.....
[/quote]


Funded by government means we pay.
You could of just answered properly without being a farqwit about it.
It was a simple question.

;)

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by mothra on Sep 16th, 2022 at 5:57am
Aaaaand they're still going. Round in circles.

Have we all agreed yet that there is indeed a gender pay gap yet the causes of it are multifaceted?

No?

I'll check back in in a week or so.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Captain Caveman on Sep 16th, 2022 at 7:33am
There is no pay gap.
If a bloke does the same job, he gets paid the same.
Now learn to deal with that, or play the victim of your own bullshyte.

Men and women get paid the same when doing the same job.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Gnads on Sep 16th, 2022 at 7:42am

mothra wrote on Sep 16th, 2022 at 5:57am:
Aaaaand they're still going. Round in circles.

Have we all agreed yet that there is indeed a gender pay gap yet the causes of it are multifaceted?

No?

I'll check back in in a week or so.


Don't bother ... your input & or scrutiny isn't needed.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by mothra on Sep 16th, 2022 at 8:00am

Gnads wrote on Sep 16th, 2022 at 7:42am:

mothra wrote on Sep 16th, 2022 at 5:57am:
Aaaaand they're still going. Round in circles.

Have we all agreed yet that there is indeed a gender pay gap yet the causes of it are multifaceted?

No?

I'll check back in in a week or so.


Don't bother ... your input & or scrutiny isn't needed.


Yes. You're much more comfortable in your echo chamber.

Still incredibly hostile though Gonads. Haemorrhoids?

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Lisa Jones on Sep 16th, 2022 at 8:16am

Captain Caveman wrote on Sep 16th, 2022 at 7:33am:
There is no pay gap.
If a bloke does the same job, he gets paid the same.
Now learn to deal with that, or play the victim of your own bullshyte.

Men and women get paid the same when doing the same job.


Good morning Captain : Like many people you're confusing the terms : "equal pay/unequal pay" with the term "gender pay gap".

Never mind....have a look at this little helpful article 👇

https://www.wgea.gov.au/the-gender-pay-gap

Cheers

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Lisa Jones on Sep 16th, 2022 at 8:16am
Flip

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Lisa Jones on Sep 16th, 2022 at 8:17am
Flip

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Gnads on Sep 16th, 2022 at 8:30am

mothra wrote on Sep 16th, 2022 at 8:00am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 16th, 2022 at 7:42am:

mothra wrote on Sep 16th, 2022 at 5:57am:
Aaaaand they're still going. Round in circles.

Have we all agreed yet that there is indeed a gender pay gap yet the causes of it are multifaceted?

No?

I'll check back in in a week or so.


Don't bother ... your input & or scrutiny isn't needed.


Yes. You're much more comfortable in your echo chamber.

Still incredibly hostile though Gonads. Haemorrhoids?


You attract hostility like a magnet

& you're as beneficial as haemorrhoids.

Though I doubt Anusol or Rectinol would cure you.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Gnads on Sep 16th, 2022 at 8:39am

Lisa Jones wrote on Sep 16th, 2022 at 8:16am:

Captain Caveman wrote on Sep 16th, 2022 at 7:33am:
There is no pay gap.
If a bloke does the same job, he gets paid the same.
Now learn to deal with that, or play the victim of your own bullshyte.

Men and women get paid the same when doing the same job.


Good morning Captain : Like many people you're confusing the terms : "equal pay/unequal pay" with the term "gender pay gap".

Never mind....have a look at this little helpful article 👇

https://www.wgea.gov.au/the-gender-pay-gap

Cheers


So you've repeated TGD quote via link.

There are still many variables as to why they earn less.

The evidence presented in that link from a govt site does nothing but make a blame game/finger point.

It would seem that trying to balance the variables & making opportunity equal in the workplace has been a waste of time..............

& begs the question that has never been able to be answered.

What do women want?

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by Captain Caveman on Sep 16th, 2022 at 10:00am

Lisa Jones wrote on Sep 16th, 2022 at 8:16am:

Captain Caveman wrote on Sep 16th, 2022 at 7:33am:
There is no pay gap.
If a bloke does the same job, he gets paid the same.
Now learn to deal with that, or play the victim of your own bullshyte.

Men and women get paid the same when doing the same job.


Good morning Captain : Like many people you're confusing the terms : "equal pay/unequal pay" with the term "gender pay gap".

Never mind....have a look at this little helpful article 👇

https://www.wgea.gov.au/the-gender-pay-gap

Cheers




Morning Lisa.
I am not confusing the issue.

Mearly pointing out that it's obviously job based.
I can guarantee you that traddie women on construction sites are becoming more and more.
So these women are paid exactly the same as the men.
As more women step up into this realm of work, the gap will close.
Unfortunately, a lot of women can not handle the work load atm.
I've seen traddie women as sparkies, heaps as traffic controllers and peggies etc but extremely rare to see a female steel fixer, PT stresser, tilt up or pre cast installers, riggers and dogman, scafolders.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 16th, 2022 at 11:52am
Gender pay gap doesn't exist.... black gap doesn't exist other than by their own efforts.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 16th, 2022 at 11:57am
I think we need to look at the real figures again.... just to un-confuse the foolish here:-

"… and now on the Grappler Morning show – our promised re-working of the classic 'gender wage gap' in an attempt to intrude some reality into the lives of those perpetually and professionally dumbed by ideology:-
https://www.google.com/search?q=australia+how+many+hours+per+week+do+men+work&oq...
https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/labour/earnings-and-working-conditions/average...


Women worked 36.4 hours pw on average, earned $1672.45

Average working weeks is 37.5 hours – so we add 1.1 hours worth to women's overall income

= $1723 for a 37.5 hour week.

Men worked 41 hours pw on average, earned $1955.45

At 37.5 hour average week – we must take away 3.5 hours pay to attain equity.

Ergo - $1955.45 - $166.92 = $1788.53 for a 37.5 hour week...

..then we must remove the half time penalty component from the extra 3.5 hours = 3.5 x $23.85 = $83.48.

Ergo - for a 37.5 hour week men would be paid  $1788.53 - $83.48 =  $1705.05.

ERGO:-  For an ordinary 37.5 hour week women are paid  $18 pw more than men, not including additions for conditions such as wet, weather, dust, remoteness, underground, height and so forth."


Would you like me to re-work the real figures for a 38 hour week, just in case you want to quibble?

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 16th, 2022 at 11:59am

Captain Caveman wrote on Sep 16th, 2022 at 10:00am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Sep 16th, 2022 at 8:16am:

Captain Caveman wrote on Sep 16th, 2022 at 7:33am:
There is no pay gap.
If a bloke does the same job, he gets paid the same.
Now learn to deal with that, or play the victim of your own bullshyte.

Men and women get paid the same when doing the same job.


Good morning Captain : Like many people you're confusing the terms : "equal pay/unequal pay" with the term "gender pay gap".

Never mind....have a look at this little helpful article 👇

https://www.wgea.gov.au/the-gender-pay-gap

Cheers




Morning Lisa.
I am not confusing the issue.

Mearly pointing out that it's obviously job based.
I can guarantee you that traddie women on construction sites are becoming more and more.
So these women are paid exactly the same as the men.
As more women step up into this realm of work, the gap will close.
Unfortunately, a lot of women can not handle the work load atm.
I've seen traddie women as sparkies, heaps as traffic controllers and peggies etc but extremely rare to see a female steel fixer, PT stresser, tilt up or pre cast installers, riggers and dogman, scafolders.


Well - at the same time there are countless sectors where women actually are paid more, being slotted into the prime positions in those.

It's time to declare genuine equal opportunity again and let the dice fall where they fall - let Right be done though the heavens fall.

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 16th, 2022 at 12:07pm
Anyway, poppets - this is very far away from freediver's original premise.... the referendum that we actually need to stop political parties cheating their way into power.

I suppose he should have known better and that the blinded ideologues* would immediately launch into the mythical realms of 'gender pay gap' against women and some equally mythical 'black gap'.

The real figures have been shown for you over and over again and yet you refuse to accept that the gender pay gap actually works the other way and men are again the ones being cheated with lies.

BTW - when you have enough experience with The Madness Of Women Crowded Into One Body With Their Multiples you will cease to give a damn what women think they want - they don't know so don't bother trying to deal with crazies... they can't handle their own lives so why would you allow them to run the world for you?

Maybe the Mussos have got it right..... just a thought...

* Event Horizon with Sam Neill, old mate of the kids' mother.... "Where we're going we won't need eyes!"  Somehow seems apt for the way this country is going down the toilet.... better not to see it .....

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 16th, 2022 at 12:17pm
No Black Gap - they're out there doing what they want to do, under their own steam as that fat dopey sheila from Melbadishu said they wanted, got free money coming in for the rent, killing and fighting one another as they choose, getting into the goom, lolling about in the warm sun living in their own remote communities, often with sandy beaches drinking rum every night, and enjoying the general fracas of their normal life.

What's to complain about?  Living the Dreamtime....

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 16th, 2022 at 12:38pm
Jesus, Igor - that shut 'em down... Truth Pills too hard to swallow.

You have to wonder why people just take in anything they are told without a single thought and then start pushing it as some kind of reality when the facts show otherwise.... reminds me of a dope ring sitting around blowing their minds, man, and talking sh1t.... that sh1t becomes reality for them, too.....

Truly we live in a mental asylum here....

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by The Grappler on Sep 16th, 2022 at 1:33pm
Jesus, Igor - that shut 'em down..... bloody reality checks..... hmmph .....

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 16th, 2022 at 2:50pm

Captain Caveman wrote on Sep 16th, 2022 at 1:58am:
Funded by government means we pay.


Given the current obsolete monetary orthodoxy, that is correct.

Which means the people will be stuck with adversarial politics, with people like you demanding  'let (the disadvantaged) eat cake'. 


Quote:
You could of just answered properly without being a farqwit about it, It was a simple question.


Simple question for  simple minds.......

At least Lisa has put you right on the gender pay gap, now you have to continue demanding child and age care workers (mostly female) be paid as little as possible      because "we all pay".

Yet the royal commision called for more age-care workers and higher pay......

Pity, either Gina will "have to pay more" or you will......


Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 16th, 2022 at 3:26pm

Gnads wrote on Sep 15th, 2022 at 6:13pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Sep 15th, 2022 at 11:23am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 14th, 2022 at 6:36pm:
Bullshyte

Statistical evidence could be tattooed on your forehead & you would still parrot the bs leftist radical feminist dogma.


https://www.wgea.gov.au/the-gender-pay-gap

What it is:
The gender pay gap measures the difference between the average earnings of women and men in the workforce. The gender pay gap is an internationally established measure of women’s position in the economy in comparison to men. The gender pay gap is the result of the social and economic factors that combine to reduce women’s earning capacity over their lifetime.


I accept your concession.



What social & economic factors?


women  can't work the same quantity of hours as men on average., over a lifetime (child bearing and rearing)


Quote:
They are not forced to bear & suckle children.


on average they are....."go forth and multiply..."


Quote:
They are paid the same rates of pay.


Feminized employment (eg age, child care: 90% female) is among the lowest paid.


Quote:
How that's worded is indicating a comparison of a working lifetime of equal lengths to men.


Addressed above, women can't take paid work as long as men over a lifetime, on average.


Quote:
And if they choose they can do that too


fortunately women on average can't choose; the race would have ceased propagating itself long ago if they could..


Quote:
Their earning capacity would not be reduced then would it?


You are extrapolating individual choices to community choices.  ...GIGO.


Quote:
Are they going to all be single at the end of their working lives?


No.


Quote:
If not & they are partnered either as a hetrosexual or a homosexual do not their partners support them & share everything?


Maybe.


Quote:
What that statement does is generalises & implies that all women choose to bear/suckle children that takes them out of the workforce & they don't earn...... it's not true.


Explained and refuted above; individuals are not communities. 


Quote:
What about the all the factors that can reduce any genders earning capacity throughout a life time
Sickness, accident, disability, death of a partner, redundancy, termination, unemployment etc etc etc.


on average, these factors will apply equally to both genders.


Quote:
It does not change the fact that all it's about is for women to be paid or paid more for not working because they choose to have children, not to work overtime, not work shift work, not work weekends, not to work dangerous jobs, not to work FIFO, not to do trade apprenticeships,,,,,,


Addressed and refuted above; on average, women -over a life-time -  will spend less time in less paid work than men.


Quote:
the list of reasons why they may earn less goes on & on.


Correct, includijg the ONE  issue - bearing and rearing/suckling  children, which men  don't do.


Quote:
And it's in the majority... choice....... not discrimination.


You don't understand averages,  or the difference between individuals and communities. 

Title: Re: a referendum we actually need
Post by thegreatdivide on Sep 16th, 2022 at 3:39pm

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 16th, 2022 at 11:52am:
Gender pay gap doesn't exist.... black gap doesn't exist other than by their own efforts.


Gender pay gap:

over a lifetime, on average,  women can't spend as much time in paid work as men. 

Black gap:

1. Av. black  life expectancy is a decade less than non-blacks.

2. In the NT, blacks are the most imprisoned people by race in the world.

Very simple grapps......this much you ought to be able to grasp, though the causes  are too complex (transition between cultures ) for your simple mind to grapple with ...(excuse the pun)

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved.