Why do the Trump cult member morons keep saying "Trump declassified the documents"?

It's irrelevant.  Completely irrelevant.

The three crimes he's being investigated for - in relation to the FBI search warrant carried out on his country club - have absolutely nothing to do with classified documents.

Why are Trumpists so stupid?  Seriously?

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 7^th, 2022 at 3:52pm:

Why do the Trump cult member morons keep saying "Trump declassified the documents"? It's irrelevant.  Completely irrelevant. The three crimes he's being investigated for - in relation to the FBI search warrant carried out on his country club - have absolutely nothing to do with classified documents. Why are Trumpists so stupid?  Seriously?

Is it because their parents are first cousins?

Hi Greggy,
If Trump is re-elected as President will you leave this forum?

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 7^th, 2022 at 3:53pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 3:52pm: Why do the Trump cult member morons keep saying "Trump declassified the documents"? It's irrelevant.  Completely irrelevant. The three crimes he's being investigated for - in relation to the FBI search warrant carried out on his country club - have absolutely nothing to do with classified documents. Why are Trumpists so stupid?  Seriously? Is it because their parents are first cousins?

Is it because they left school at 14?

I repeat: The three crimes the alleged child rapist is being investigated for - in relation to the FBI search warrant carried out on his country club - have absolutely nothing to do with classified documents.

GREGGY WILL LEAVE IF TRUMP WINS


Bobby. wrote on Dec 29^th, 2021 at 9:19pm:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1478657809/72#72 Re: Pecca Said He would Leave OP If Trump Wins!! Reply #72 - Nov 9th, 2016 at 3:16pm Greggy, Quote: Absolutely nothing changes for me: if Trump wins, I will leave this forum forever, even if no one else takes me up on the bet.

The three crimes the alleged child rapist is being investigated for - in relation to the FBI search warrant carried out on his country club - have absolutely nothing to do with classified documents.

Bobby. wrote on Sep 7^th, 2022 at 4:11pm:

Hi Greggy, If Trump is re-elected as President will you leave this forum?

;D ;D ;D

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 7^th, 2022 at 3:52pm:

Why do the Trump cult member morons keep saying "Trump declassified the documents"? It's irrelevant.  Completely irrelevant. The three crimes he's being investigated for - in relation to the FBI search warrant carried out on his country club - have absolutely nothing to do with classified documents. Why are Trumpists so stupid?  Seriously?

True.

And....if you ask a Trumpist (as I have on the Yank Forum) what the physical process is to de-classify a document, they have no answer.

And here's a little something from Geoff and Random in another Topic.
_____________________________________
AusGeoff wrote Today at 4:33pm:
Pilger supported Trump's 2016 candidacy, and says;  "Trump is speaking straight
to ordinary Americans...  people like this lack of cant, and when the so-called liberal
media deride him, they like him even more".

The same year, Pilger said; "The notorious terrorist jihadist group called ISIL or ISIS
is created largely with money from the government of Saudi and the government of
Qatar who are giving money to the Clinton Foundation".

Hmmm...

__________________________________________
Random wrote:

He was right about one thing topical now though ...

"In August 2017, in an article published on his website, Pilger wrote that a "coup against the man in the White House is under way. This is not because he is an odious human being, but because he has consistently made clear he does not want war with Russia. This glimpse of sanity, or simple pragmatism, is anathema to the 'national security' managers who guard a system based on war, surveillance, armaments, threats and extreme capitalism".

So Trump is gone and guess what?  NATO expansion has forced Russia to act to protect their borders.   American factories are back in black.  A proxy war!
_______________________________________________
;D

Bobby. wrote on Sep 7^th, 2022 at 4:38pm:

GREGGY WILL LEAVE IF TRUMP WINS Bobby. wrote on Dec 29th, 2021 at 9:19pm: https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1478657809/72#72 Re: Pecca Said He would Leave OP If Trump Wins!! Reply #72 - Nov 9th, 2016 at 3:16pm Greggy, Quote: Absolutely nothing changes for me: if Trump wins, I will leave this forum forever, even if no one else takes me up on the bet.

Stupid bet, nobody should leave over such an inane game.

Jasin wrote on Sep 7^th, 2022 at 5:45pm:

And here's a little something from Geoff and Random in another Topic. _____________________________________ AusGeoff wrote Today at 4:33pm: Pilger supported Trump's 2016 candidacy, and says;  "Trump is speaking straight to ordinary Americans...  people like this lack of cant, and when the so-called liberal media deride him, they like him even more". The same year, Pilger said; "The notorious terrorist jihadist group called ISIL or ISIS is created largely with money from the government of Saudi and the government of Qatar who are giving money to the Clinton Foundation". Hmmm... __________________________________________ Random wrote: He was right about one thing topical now though ... "In August 2017, in an article published on his website, Pilger wrote that a "coup against the man in the White House is under way. This is not because he is an odious human being, but because he has consistently made clear he does not want war with Russia. This glimpse of sanity, or simple pragmatism, is anathema to the 'national security' managers who guard a system based on war, surveillance, armaments, threats and extreme capitalism". So Trump is gone and guess what?  NATO expansion has forced Russia to act to protect their borders.   American factories are back in black.  A proxy war! _______________________________________________ ;D

Quote:

NATO expansion has forced Russia to act to protect their borders.

No need to re post dumb ?

The documents are now in the hands of Trumps 'special master' and will be for a couple of years or more so the raid is another fizzer. It looks like its back to the drawing board for old Nancy Pants.

Where are the nuclear bomb blueprints and their codes!

Johnnie wrote on Sep 7^th, 2022 at 10:37pm:

The documents are now in the hands of Trumps 'special master' and will be for a couple of years or more so the raid is another fizzer. It looks like its back to the drawing board for old Nancy Pants. Where are the nuclear bomb blueprints and their codes!

Oh, I see. So the Grand Master just takes them for a few years until the Don gets elected and takes them back. Is that how it works?

Good to know, Matty, good to know.

You do know Dear Leader has no intention of running, don't you?

If there's one thing he fears more acutely than losing once, it's losing twice.

Donnie had his day, dear. He blew it.

You?

If this were the other way around and it was a Democrat or progressive who was a traitor there would be none of the right here. All their heads would have exploded.

We seen what happened with Hillary over about 3 documents Now Trump has stolen a few thousand lost some has some of the highest security level possibly sold some and stored the rest in an insecure manner.

Not only that but the last 12 months the US had more spies killed than ever before, what odds it relates to Trumps stolen documents getting out ?

This is like 10,000 times Hilary's server and 1,000 times Julian Assange and the right want to sweep it under the bed where all the reds are.

Karnal wrote on Sep 8^th, 2022 at 12:26am:

Johnnie wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 10:37pm: The documents are now in the hands of Trumps 'special master' and will be for a couple of years or more so the raid is another fizzer. It looks like its back to the drawing board for old Nancy Pants. Where are the nuclear bomb blueprints and their codes! Oh, I see. So the Grand Master just takes them for a few years until the Don gets elected and takes them back. Is that how it works? Good to know, Matty, good to know. You do know Dear Leader has no intention of running, don't you? If there's one thing he fears more acutely than losing once, it's losing twice. Donnie had his day, dear. He blew it. You?

Pretty much but that's not important right now, it's those nuclear codes.

Aussie wrote on Sep 7^th, 2022 at 5:33pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 3:52pm: Why do the Trump cult member morons keep saying "Trump declassified the documents"? It's irrelevant.  Completely irrelevant. The three crimes he's being investigated for - in relation to the FBI search warrant carried out on his country club - have absolutely nothing to do with classified documents. Why are Trumpists so stupid?  Seriously? True. And....if you ask a Trumpist (as I have on the Yank Forum) what the physical process is to de-classify a document, they have no answer.

Because they have no brains.

But, as I have explained, the three crimes he's being investigated for - in relation to the FBI search warrant carried out on his country club - have absolutely nothing to do with the documents being classified.

Classified or not, he's still committed at least three crimes.

Johnnie wrote on Sep 8^th, 2022 at 12:51am:

Karnal wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 12:26am: Johnnie wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 10:37pm: The documents are now in the hands of Trumps 'special master' and will be for a couple of years or more so the raid is another fizzer. It looks like its back to the drawing board for old Nancy Pants. Where are the nuclear bomb blueprints and their codes! Oh, I see. So the Grand Master just takes them for a few years until the Don gets elected and takes them back. Is that how it works? Good to know, Matty, good to know. You do know Dear Leader has no intention of running, don't you? If there's one thing he fears more acutely than losing once, it's losing twice. Donnie had his day, dear. He blew it. You? Pretty much but that's not important right now, it's those nuclear codes.

Sorry? What does that mean, Matty?

Would you care to explain it to us?

Karnal wrote on Sep 8^th, 2022 at 8:13am:

Johnnie wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 12:51am: Karnal wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 12:26am: Johnnie wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 10:37pm: The documents are now in the hands of Trumps 'special master' and will be for a couple of years or more so the raid is another fizzer. It looks like its back to the drawing board for old Nancy Pants. Where are the nuclear bomb blueprints and their codes! Oh, I see. So the Grand Master just takes them for a few years until the Don gets elected and takes them back. Is that how it works? Good to know, Matty, good to know. You do know Dear Leader has no intention of running, don't you? If there's one thing he fears more acutely than losing once, it's losing twice. Donnie had his day, dear. He blew it. You? Pretty much but that's not important right now, it's those nuclear codes. Sorry? What does that mean, Matty? Would you care to explain it to us?

Aren't you concerned at all about the nuclear codes that Trump supposedly walked out the door with, you must remember that! you were part of the lynch squad.

Anyways Trumps special master will sort this mess out in a few years. Does Nancy have a plan C ?

Karnal wrote on Sep 8^th, 2022 at 12:26am:

Johnnie wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 10:37pm: The documents are now in the hands of Trumps 'special master' and will be for a couple of years or more so the raid is another fizzer. It looks like its back to the drawing board for old Nancy Pants. Where are the nuclear bomb blueprints and their codes! Oh, I see. So the Grand Master just takes them for a few years until the Don gets elected and takes them back. Is that how it works? Good to know, Matty, good to know. You do know Dear Leader has no intention of running, don't you? If there's one thing he fears more acutely than losing once, it's losing twice.

As well as losing the popular vote three times.

3,000,000+ votes the first time.

7,000,000+ votes the second time.

And if he ran a third time, he'd be beaten by 10,000,000+

So much winning   :)

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 8^th, 2022 at 3:26pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 12:26am: Johnnie wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 10:37pm: The documents are now in the hands of Trumps 'special master' and will be for a couple of years or more so the raid is another fizzer. It looks like its back to the drawing board for old Nancy Pants. Where are the nuclear bomb blueprints and their codes! Oh, I see. So the Grand Master just takes them for a few years until the Don gets elected and takes them back. Is that how it works? Good to know, Matty, good to know. You do know Dear Leader has no intention of running, don't you? If there's one thing he fears more acutely than losing once, it's losing twice. As well as losing the popular vote three times. 3,000,000+ votes the first time. 7,000,000+ votes the second time. And if he ran a third time, he'd be beaten by 10,000,000+ So much winning   :)

hehehe, 3,000,000 inner city Oprah fans votes didn't count for sh!t, funny about that.

https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/113/579/158/small/c68ba5aee365b141.jpg

Johnnie wrote on Sep 8^th, 2022 at 3:22pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:13am: Johnnie wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 12:51am: Karnal wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 12:26am: Johnnie wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 10:37pm: The documents are now in the hands of Trumps 'special master' and will be for a couple of years or more so the raid is another fizzer. It looks like its back to the drawing board for old Nancy Pants. Where are the nuclear bomb blueprints and their codes! Oh, I see. So the Grand Master just takes them for a few years until the Don gets elected and takes them back. Is that how it works? Good to know, Matty, good to know. You do know Dear Leader has no intention of running, don't you? If there's one thing he fears more acutely than losing once, it's losing twice. Donnie had his day, dear. He blew it. You? Pretty much but that's not important right now, it's those nuclear codes. Sorry? What does that mean, Matty? Would you care to explain it to us? Aren't you concerned at all about the nuclear codes that Trump supposedly walked out the door with, you must remember that! you were part of the lynch squad. Anyways Trumps special master will sort this mess out in a few years. Does Nancy have a plan C ?

Your propaganda's gone stale, Matty. Dear Leader's moved on, dear, do try to keep up.

They shifted from Nancy over a month ago. They've upped it to Sleepy Joe, after his Nazi speech. Dear Leader gave you two hours worth of talking points only last week.

Try to keep up, okay? Dear Leader's not talking for the sake of hearing his own voice, you know. You're supposed to be taking notes.

Go back, watch the speech, read Trump.News and do your job properly, okay?

I don't want to have to tell you again.

https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/113/530/048/small/48d1f2c3504b0a40.jpg

Bobby. wrote on Sep 8^th, 2022 at 6:18pm:

https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/113/530/048/small/48d1f2c3504b0a40.jpg

As for you, Bobby, kut the krap with Melania's knickers, this is serious.

Dear Leader's moved on from the FBI. He's now targeting the enemy of the state, Sleepy Joe himself.

If you people can't even regurgitate a simple line, what's the point of having you? Mr Trump's sick of it. People keep coming up to him all the time.

Sir, what is it with these internet bots and stale propaganda? Can't they follow a simple narrative? Why can't they say what they're told?

They're right, Bobby. Mr Trump can't be there to hold your hand while you post, you need to pay attention.

Does anyone else get the feeling Bobby is masturbating while he posts these underwear pics?

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 8^th, 2022 at 3:26pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 12:26am: Johnnie wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 10:37pm: The documents are now in the hands of Trumps 'special master' and will be for a couple of years or more so the raid is another fizzer. It looks like its back to the drawing board for old Nancy Pants. Where are the nuclear bomb blueprints and their codes! Oh, I see. So the Grand Master just takes them for a few years until the Don gets elected and takes them back. Is that how it works? Good to know, Matty, good to know. You do know Dear Leader has no intention of running, don't you? If there's one thing he fears more acutely than losing once, it's losing twice. As well as losing the popular vote three times. 3,000,000+ votes the first time. 7,000,000+ votes the second time. And if he ran a third time, he'd be beaten by 10,000,000+ So much winning   :)

Yes, Greggery, but that was Mr Trump's cunning strategy. He was going for the delegates, remember? It's a totally different game to going for the popular vote. Mr Trump's explained all this.

That was in 2016. He switched strategies in 2020 to lynching the Vice Prez.

Cunning, no?

Karnal wrote on Sep 8^th, 2022 at 6:37pm:

Bobby. wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 6:18pm: https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/113/530/048/small/48d1f2c3504b0a40.jpg As for you, Bobby, kut the krap with Melania's knickers, this is serious. Dear Leader's moved on from the FBI. He's now targeting the enemy of the state, Sleepy Joe himself. If you people can't even regurgitate a simple line, what's the point of having you? Mr Trump's sick of it. People keep coming up to him all the time. Sir, what is it with these internet bots and stale propaganda? Can't they follow a simple narrative? Why can't they say what they're told? They're right, Bobby. Mr Trump can't be there to hold your hand while you post, you need to pay attention.

Why didn't they lock Hillary up?

https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/press-release-new-hillary-bombshell-22-emails-were-too-damaging-national-security-ever-be

Press Release - New Hillary Bombshell:

22 Emails Were 'Too Damaging to
National Security to Ever Be Released'


January 29, 2016


They're so sensitive, the State Department won't release them AT ALL — not even in censored form.

    The Obama administration confirmed for the first time Friday that Hillary Clinton's unsecured home server contained closely guarded government secrets, censoring 22 emails with material requiring one of the highest levels of classification. The revelation comes just three days before the Iowa presidential nominating caucuses in which Clinton is a candidate.

Karnal wrote on Sep 8^th, 2022 at 6:43pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 3:26pm: Karnal wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 12:26am: Johnnie wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 10:37pm: The documents are now in the hands of Trumps 'special master' and will be for a couple of years or more so the raid is another fizzer. It looks like its back to the drawing board for old Nancy Pants. Where are the nuclear bomb blueprints and their codes! Oh, I see. So the Grand Master just takes them for a few years until the Don gets elected and takes them back. Is that how it works? Good to know, Matty, good to know. You do know Dear Leader has no intention of running, don't you? If there's one thing he fears more acutely than losing once, it's losing twice. As well as losing the popular vote three times. 3,000,000+ votes the first time. 7,000,000+ votes the second time. And if he ran a third time, he'd be beaten by 10,000,000+ So much winning   :) Yes, Greggery, but that was Mr Trump's cunning strategy. He was going for the delegates, remember? It's a totally different game to going for the popular vote. Mr Trump's explained all this. That was in 2016. He switched strategies in 2020 to lynching the Vice Prez. Cunning, no?

5 years.

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 8^th, 2022 at 7:06pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 6:43pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 3:26pm: Karnal wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 12:26am: Johnnie wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 10:37pm: The documents are now in the hands of Trumps 'special master' and will be for a couple of years or more so the raid is another fizzer. It looks like its back to the drawing board for old Nancy Pants. Where are the nuclear bomb blueprints and their codes! Oh, I see. So the Grand Master just takes them for a few years until the Don gets elected and takes them back. Is that how it works? Good to know, Matty, good to know. You do know Dear Leader has no intention of running, don't you? If there's one thing he fears more acutely than losing once, it's losing twice. As well as losing the popular vote three times. 3,000,000+ votes the first time. 7,000,000+ votes the second time. And if he ran a third time, he'd be beaten by 10,000,000+ So much winning   :) Yes, Greggery, but that was Mr Trump's cunning strategy. He was going for the delegates, remember? It's a totally different game to going for the popular vote. Mr Trump's explained all this. That was in 2016. He switched strategies in 2020 to lynching the Vice Prez. Cunning, no? 5 years.

We need to study him, Greggery. Aquascoot's never said Mr Trump's awesome or anything, just that he's a master snake oil salesman.

Read your Paretto. The Superior Man plays the game by the rules of the game itself.

Mike's okay about it. I mean, he hasn't complained, right?

Bobby. wrote on Sep 8^th, 2022 at 6:18pm:

https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/113/530/048/small/48d1f2c3504b0a40.jpg

The FBI wouldn't leave anything to chance, they had to go there.

Johnnie wrote on Sep 8^th, 2022 at 7:17pm:

Bobby. wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 6:18pm: https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/113/530/048/small/48d1f2c3504b0a40.jpg The FBI wouldn't leave anything to chance, they had to go there.

Miam miam.

https://cdn.tasteatlas.com/images/ingredients/078acd9cfee54f9fa581fff3f2be39c5.jpg

Bobby. wrote on Sep 8^th, 2022 at 7:03pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 6:37pm: Bobby. wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 6:18pm: https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/113/530/048/small/48d1f2c3504b0a40.jpg As for you, Bobby, kut the krap with Melania's knickers, this is serious. Dear Leader's moved on from the FBI. He's now targeting the enemy of the state, Sleepy Joe himself. If you people can't even regurgitate a simple line, what's the point of having you? Mr Trump's sick of it. People keep coming up to him all the time. Sir, what is it with these internet bots and stale propaganda? Can't they follow a simple narrative? Why can't they say what they're told? They're right, Bobby. Mr Trump can't be there to hold your hand while you post, you need to pay attention. Why didn't they lock Hillary up? https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/press-release-new-hillary-bombshell-22-emails-were-too-damaging-national-security-ever-be Press Release - New Hillary Bombshell: 22 Emails Were 'Too Damaging to National Security to Ever Be Released' January 29, 2016 They're so sensitive, the State Department won't release them AT ALL — not even in censored form.     The Obama administration confirmed for the first time Friday that Hillary Clinton's unsecured home server contained closely guarded government secrets, censoring 22 emails with material requiring one of the highest levels of classification. The revelation comes just three days before the Iowa presidential nominating caucuses in which Clinton is a candidate.

Bobby, Secretaries of State send top secret emails all the time. Hillary sent 22, but I'm curious.

Do you think Hillary should be prosecuted for that?

Karnal wrote on Sep 8^th, 2022 at 7:56pm:

Bobby, Secretaries of State send top secret emails all the time. Hillary sent 22, but I'm curious. Do you think Hillary should be prosecuted for that?

She had them in an illegal place - her home computer/ server.     :o

They were insecure from hackers.

Lock her up.

Bobby. wrote on Sep 8^th, 2022 at 7:59pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 7:56pm: Bobby, Secretaries of State send top secret emails all the time. Hillary sent 22, but I'm curious. Do you think Hillary should be prosecuted for that? She had them in an illegal place - her home computer/ server.     :o They were insecure from hackers. Lock her up.

Right. So you want to lock up a Secretary of State for sending 22 pieces of classified information through a secured private server.

So I'm curious. What would you do with a prez who kept 11,000 in his unlocked private basement?

Karnal wrote on Sep 8^th, 2022 at 8:05pm:

Bobby. wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 7:59pm: Karnal wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 7:56pm: Bobby, Secretaries of State send top secret emails all the time. Hillary sent 22, but I'm curious. Do you think Hillary should be prosecuted for that? She had them in an illegal place - her home computer/ server.     :o They were insecure from hackers. Lock her up. Right. So you want to lock up a Secretary of State for sending 22 pieces of classified information through a secured private server. So I'm curious. What would you do with a prez who kept 11,000 in his unlocked private basement?

I dunno -
the first thing I'd do is ask why Donald had them?
Did he say?

Bobby. wrote on Sep 8^th, 2022 at 8:07pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:05pm: Bobby. wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 7:59pm: Karnal wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 7:56pm: Bobby, Secretaries of State send top secret emails all the time. Hillary sent 22, but I'm curious. Do you think Hillary should be prosecuted for that? She had them in an illegal place - her home computer/ server.     :o They were insecure from hackers. Lock her up. Right. So you want to lock up a Secretary of State for sending 22 pieces of classified information through a secured private server. So I'm curious. What would you do with a prez who kept 11,000 in his unlocked private basement? I dunno - the first thing I'd do is ask why Donald had them? Did he say?

Listen to Booby.

Booby knows lotsa stuff.

Booby is a Climate Change Denier in charge of the Environment forum!

https://c.tenor.com/xcgAgjj2mbEAAAAC/laugh-laughing.gif

random wrote on Sep 8^th, 2022 at 8:10pm:

Bobby. wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:07pm: Karnal wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:05pm: Bobby. wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 7:59pm: Karnal wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 7:56pm: Bobby, Secretaries of State send top secret emails all the time. Hillary sent 22, but I'm curious. Do you think Hillary should be prosecuted for that? She had them in an illegal place - her home computer/ server.     :o They were insecure from hackers. Lock her up. Right. So you want to lock up a Secretary of State for sending 22 pieces of classified information through a secured private server. So I'm curious. What would you do with a prez who kept 11,000 in his unlocked private basement? I dunno - the first thing I'd do is ask why Donald had them? Did he say? Listen to Booby. Booby knows lotsa stuff. Booby is a Climate Change Denier in charge of the Environment forum! https://c.tenor.com/xcgAgjj2mbEAAAAC/laugh-laughing.gif

And a gay man who talks about Melania's crusty underwear.

Bobby. wrote on Sep 8^th, 2022 at 8:07pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:05pm: Bobby. wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 7:59pm: Karnal wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 7:56pm: Bobby, Secretaries of State send top secret emails all the time. Hillary sent 22, but I'm curious. Do you think Hillary should be prosecuted for that? She had them in an illegal place - her home computer/ server.     :o They were insecure from hackers. Lock her up. Right. So you want to lock up a Secretary of State for sending 22 pieces of classified information through a secured private server. So I'm curious. What would you do with a prez who kept 11,000 in his unlocked private basement? I dunno - the first thing I'd do is ask why Donald had them? Did he say?

Right, so you're getting to intent.

The FBI didn't prodecute Hillary because they judged her intent clueless. She was just doing what her IT team told her to do. Thus, a prosecution could never be successful.

Dear Leader, on the other hand, had multiple visits by the National Archives Office, was told he was breaking the law, and promised to hand his stolen documents in.

We already have clear evidence that Dear Leader knew he was breaking the law and refused to comply with it. Who says?

Dear Leader's own Attorney General, good old AG Barr. Under which law? Why, the National Security bill Dear Leader signed into effect.

Dear Leader had those records because he took them. He clearly knew better - he approved the law itself. And if he could be in any doubt, National Archives told him, and he said whoops. Sorry. My bad. I promise to hand them over.

So I'm curious. What, exactly, do you want to know?

Lock her up.

https://c.tenor.com/kCDRAwbFOmUAAAAC/hillary-clinton-hillbilly.gif

Karnal wrote on Sep 8^th, 2022 at 8:34pm:

Right, so you're getting to intent. The FBI didn't prodecute Hillary because they judged her intent clueless. She was just doing what her IT team told her to do. Thus, a prosecution could never be successful. Dear Leader, on the other hand, had multiple visits by the National Archives Office, was told he was breaking the law, and promised to hand his stolen documents in. We already have clear evidence that Dear Leader knew he was breaking the law and refused to comply with it. Who says? Dear Leader's own Attorney General, good old AG Barr. Under which law? Why, the National Security bill Dear Leader signed into effect. Dear Leader had those records because he took them. He clearly knew better - he approved the law itself. And if he could be in any doubt, National Archives told him, and he said whoops. Sorry. My bad. I promise to hand them over. So I'm curious. What, exactly, do you want to know?

You'll have to be patient -
any trial will take time - it could be years.
Wait and see.

Bobby. wrote on Sep 8^th, 2022 at 7:59pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 7:56pm: Bobby, Secretaries of State send top secret emails all the time. Hillary sent 22, but I'm curious. Do you think Hillary should be prosecuted for that? She had them in an illegal place - her home computer/ server.     :o They were insecure from hackers. Lock her up.

The 2 cases are amazingly dissimilar, Almost the opposite is true when comparing them. All the elements needed for prosecution clearly exist in the Trump case and not the Clinton one.

When Clinton was asked to return the email a good faith effort was made with 30,000 emails being produced. Trump refused to return the docs he physically stole.

No Documents were stolen. Trump physically stole the Documents

Much of the classified documents were not classified at the time. The Documents stolen by Trump had various classifications right to the most secret level.

There was no evidence of intent or obstruction. There is clear evidence of both intent and obstruction by Trump.


Quote:

In our system, the prosecutors make the decisions about whether charges are appropriate based on evidence the FBI has helped collect. Although we don’t normally make public our recommendations to the prosecutors, we frequently make recommendations and engage in productive conversations with prosecutors about what resolution may be appropriate, given the evidence. In this case, given the importance of the matter, I think unusual transparency is in order. Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past. In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here. To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now. As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case. https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-releases/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system [quote]With respect to the thousands of e-mails we found that were not among those produced to State, agencies have concluded that three of those were classified at the time they were sent or received

Quote:

With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked

[/quote]

Bobby. wrote on Sep 8^th, 2022 at 8:50pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:34pm: Right, so you're getting to intent. The FBI didn't prodecute Hillary because they judged her intent clueless. She was just doing what her IT team told her to do. Thus, a prosecution could never be successful. Dear Leader, on the other hand, had multiple visits by the National Archives Office, was told he was breaking the law, and promised to hand his stolen documents in. We already have clear evidence that Dear Leader knew he was breaking the law and refused to comply with it. Who says? Dear Leader's own Attorney General, good old AG Barr. Under which law? Why, the National Security bill Dear Leader signed into effect. Dear Leader had those records because he took them. He clearly knew better - he approved the law itself. And if he could be in any doubt, National Archives told him, and he said whoops. Sorry. My bad. I promise to hand them over. So I'm curious. What, exactly, do you want to know? You'll have to be patient - any trial will take time - it could be years. Wait and see.

No, I asked you what you think. Why do you want to lock up a Secretary for 22 docs when the prez has 11,000?

Don't want to say?

Karnal wrote on Sep 8^th, 2022 at 10:43pm:

Bobby. wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:50pm: Karnal wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:34pm: Right, so you're getting to intent. The FBI didn't prodecute Hillary because they judged her intent clueless. She was just doing what her IT team told her to do. Thus, a prosecution could never be successful. Dear Leader, on the other hand, had multiple visits by the National Archives Office, was told he was breaking the law, and promised to hand his stolen documents in. We already have clear evidence that Dear Leader knew he was breaking the law and refused to comply with it. Who says? Dear Leader's own Attorney General, good old AG Barr. Under which law? Why, the National Security bill Dear Leader signed into effect. Dear Leader had those records because he took them. He clearly knew better - he approved the law itself. And if he could be in any doubt, National Archives told him, and he said whoops. Sorry. My bad. I promise to hand them over. So I'm curious. What, exactly, do you want to know? You'll have to be patient - any trial will take time - it could be years. Wait and see. No, I asked you what you think. Why do you want to lock up a Secretary for 22 docs when the prez has 11,000? Don't want to say?

Trump declassified those documents.
If he made a mistake he needs to be forgiven - no?

Dnarever wrote on Sep 8^th, 2022 at 10:39pm:

Bobby. wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 7:59pm: Karnal wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 7:56pm: Bobby, Secretaries of State send top secret emails all the time. Hillary sent 22, but I'm curious. Do you think Hillary should be prosecuted for that? She had them in an illegal place - her home computer/ server.     :o They were insecure from hackers. Lock her up. The 2 cases are amazingly dissimilar, Almost the opposite is true when comparing them. All the elements needed for prosecution clearly exist in the Trump case and not the Clinton one. When Clinton was asked to return the email a good faith effort was made with 30,000 emails being produced. Trump refused to return the docs he physically stole. No Documents were stolen. Trump physically stole the Documents Much of the classified documents were not classified at the time. The Documents stolen by Trump had various classifications right to the most secret level. There was no evidence of intent or obstruction. There is clear evidence of both intent and obstruction by Trump. Quote: In our system, the prosecutors make the decisions about whether charges are appropriate based on evidence the FBI has helped collect. Although we don’t normally make public our recommendations to the prosecutors, we frequently make recommendations and engage in productive conversations with prosecutors about what resolution may be appropriate, given the evidence. In this case, given the importance of the matter, I think unusual transparency is in order. Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past. In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here. To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now. As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case. https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-releases/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system [quote]With respect to the thousands of e-mails we found that were not among those produced to State, agencies have concluded that three of those were classified at the time they were sent or received [quote]With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked

[/quote][/quote]

And do you know? AG Barr said just that.

Now, Bobby spent a good year back in 2018 telling us how great AG Barr is - great legal scholar, tough, fair, all that.

And now Bobby wants to wait and see.

Would you like to tickle his tummy? Bobby wants a pat.

Bobby. wrote on Sep 8^th, 2022 at 10:45pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 10:43pm: Bobby. wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:50pm: Karnal wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:34pm: Right, so you're getting to intent. The FBI didn't prodecute Hillary because they judged her intent clueless. She was just doing what her IT team told her to do. Thus, a prosecution could never be successful. Dear Leader, on the other hand, had multiple visits by the National Archives Office, was told he was breaking the law, and promised to hand his stolen documents in. We already have clear evidence that Dear Leader knew he was breaking the law and refused to comply with it. Who says? Dear Leader's own Attorney General, good old AG Barr. Under which law? Why, the National Security bill Dear Leader signed into effect. Dear Leader had those records because he took them. He clearly knew better - he approved the law itself. And if he could be in any doubt, National Archives told him, and he said whoops. Sorry. My bad. I promise to hand them over. So I'm curious. What, exactly, do you want to know? You'll have to be patient - any trial will take time - it could be years. Wait and see. No, I asked you what you think. Why do you want to lock up a Secretary for 22 docs when the prez has 11,000? Don't want to say? Trump declassified those documents. If he made a mistake he needs to be forgiven - no?

You dont want to forgive Hillary, dear. Now why is that?

How could Dear Leader make a mistake? He signed the two year sentence into effect.

Bobby? You've gone all shy.

How could Dear Leader make a mistake when the National Archives warned him he'd be charged if he didn't hand over their records?

When he said sorry and promised to give them back?

When they've asked repeatedly for the past 18 months?

When he had the law changed to two years imprisonment after he spent three years calling to LOCK HER UP?

Don't want to say?

Karnal wrote on Sep 8^th, 2022 at 10:50pm:

You dont want to forgive Hillary, dear. Now why is that? How could Dear Leader make a mistake? He signed the two year sentence into effect.

I only asked that Hillary would get a fair trial.   :-?

Bobby. wrote on Sep 8^th, 2022 at 11:17pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 10:50pm: You dont want to forgive Hillary, dear. Now why is that? How could Dear Leader make a mistake? He signed the two year sentence into effect. I only asked that Hillary would get a fair trial.   :-?

No, you said LOCK HER UP.

Are you asking for your Dear Leader to get a trial? Or are you saying he should be let go?

Which?

Karnal wrote on Sep 8^th, 2022 at 11:53pm:

Bobby. wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 11:17pm: Karnal wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 10:50pm: You dont want to forgive Hillary, dear. Now why is that? How could Dear Leader make a mistake? He signed the two year sentence into effect. I only asked that Hillary would get a fair trial.   :-? No, you said LOCK HER UP. Are you asking for your Dear Leader to get a trial? Or are you saying he should be let go? Which?

Trump should get his trial after Hillary and all the others.
There's only so much room in the courthouses -  no?

Bobby. wrote on Sep 7^th, 2022 at 4:11pm:

Hi Greggy, If Trump is re-elected as President will you leave this forum?

https://i.postimg.cc/qBX5sY63/Gay-Bobby.jpg


I'll leave this forum if you honestly come out of the closet and admit you're gay, Blooby.

Marla wrote on Sep 9^th, 2022 at 12:04am:

Bobby. wrote on Sep 7th, 2022 at 4:11pm: Hi Greggy, If Trump is re-elected as President will you leave this forum? https://i.postimg.cc/qBX5sY63/Gay-Bobby.jpg I'll leave this forum if you honestly come out of the closet and admit you're gay, Bobby.

Looks like we're stuck with you then - you dumb broad.   ;D

Bobby. wrote on Sep 8^th, 2022 at 8:07pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 8:05pm: Bobby. wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 7:59pm: Karnal wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 7:56pm: Bobby, Secretaries of State send top secret emails all the time. Hillary sent 22, but I'm curious. Do you think Hillary should be prosecuted for that? She had them in an illegal place - her home computer/ server.     :o They were insecure from hackers. Lock her up. Right. So you want to lock up a Secretary of State for sending 22 pieces of classified information through a secured private server. So I'm curious. What would you do with a prez who kept 11,000 in his unlocked private basement? I dunno - the first thing I'd do is ask why Donald had them? Did he say?

If you catch a bank robber with the money from a bank robbery do the police then find out why he had taken the money?

It makes no difference - Trump has been caught with stolen government documents, there is no excuse and no need to find out why - Just lock him up.

Dnarever wrote on Sep 9^th, 2022 at 12:06am:

If you catch a bank robber with the money from a bank robbery do the police then find out why he had taken the money? It makes no difference - Trump has been caught with stolen government documents, there is no excuse and no need to find out why - Just lock him up.

You wanna hang em don't you?   

Bobby. wrote on Sep 8^th, 2022 at 11:56pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 11:53pm: Bobby. wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 11:17pm: Karnal wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 10:50pm: You dont want to forgive Hillary, dear. Now why is that? How could Dear Leader make a mistake? He signed the two year sentence into effect. I only asked that Hillary would get a fair trial.   :-? No, you said LOCK HER UP. Are you asking for your Dear Leader to get a trial? Or are you saying he should be let go? Which? Trump should get his trial after Hillary and all the others. There's only so much room in the courthouses -  no?

Sorry, are you now saying Dear Leader should be indicted?

It's not clear. Please explain?

Karnal wrote on Sep 9^th, 2022 at 12:10am:

Bobby. wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 11:56pm: Karnal wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 11:53pm: Bobby. wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 11:17pm: Karnal wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 10:50pm: You dont want to forgive Hillary, dear. Now why is that? How could Dear Leader make a mistake? He signed the two year sentence into effect. I only asked that Hillary would get a fair trial.   :-? No, you said LOCK HER UP. Are you asking for your Dear Leader to get a trial? Or are you saying he should be let go? Which? Trump should get his trial after Hillary and all the others. There's only so much room in the courthouses -  no? Sorry, are you now saying Dear Leader should be indicted? It's not clear. Please explain?

Put him on trial and you can be the hangman.  :)

Bobby. wrote on Sep 9^th, 2022 at 12:05am:

[ Looks like we're stuck with you then - you dumb broad.   ;D

Why so afraid to admit what you really are, Blooby?

Bobby. wrote on Sep 9^th, 2022 at 12:11am:

Karnal wrote on Sep 9th, 2022 at 12:10am: Bobby. wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 11:56pm: Karnal wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 11:53pm: Bobby. wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 11:17pm: Karnal wrote on Sep 8th, 2022 at 10:50pm: You dont want to forgive Hillary, dear. Now why is that? How could Dear Leader make a mistake? He signed the two year sentence into effect. I only asked that Hillary would get a fair trial.   :-? No, you said LOCK HER UP. Are you asking for your Dear Leader to get a trial? Or are you saying he should be let go? Which? Trump should get his trial after Hillary and all the others. There's only so much room in the courthouses -  no? Sorry, are you now saying Dear Leader should be indicted? It's not clear. Please explain? Put him on trial and you can be the hangman.  :)

Would you like to answer the question?

Karnal wrote on Sep 9^th, 2022 at 12:15am:

Would you like to answer the question?

I said yes - put him on trial in Karnal county -

now are you up to this hangman job or not?

Bobby. wrote on Sep 9^th, 2022 at 12:27am:

Karnal wrote on Sep 9th, 2022 at 12:15am: Would you like to answer the question? I said yes - put him on trial in Karnal county - now are you up to this hangman job or not?

No, you're playing cute. Do you stick to your guns, or have you just outed yourself as a bigger hypocrite than Longy?

Karnal wrote on Sep 9^th, 2022 at 12:30am:

Bobby. wrote on Sep 9th, 2022 at 12:27am: Karnal wrote on Sep 9th, 2022 at 12:15am: Would you like to answer the question? I said yes - put him on trial in Karnal county - now are you up to this hangman job or not? No, you're playing cute. Do you stick to your guns, or have you just outed yourself as a bigger hypocrite than Longy?

What do you want me to say?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZTe-_yqmhQ

Bobby. wrote on Sep 9^th, 2022 at 12:33am:

Karnal wrote on Sep 9th, 2022 at 12:30am: Bobby. wrote on Sep 9th, 2022 at 12:27am: Karnal wrote on Sep 9th, 2022 at 12:15am: Would you like to answer the question? I said yes - put him on trial in Karnal county - now are you up to this hangman job or not? No, you're playing cute. Do you stick to your guns, or have you just outed yourself as a bigger hypocrite than Longy? What do you want me to say? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZTe-_yqmhQ

You know what you need to say, Bobby. The same you said for Hillary, no cutesie pies.

Just say it.

Hi Karnal - this?

Lock her up.

https://c.tenor.com/kCDRAwbFOmUAAAAC/hillary-clinton-hillbilly.gif

Bobby. wrote on Sep 9^th, 2022 at 8:07am:

Hi Karnal - this? Lock her up. https://c.tenor.com/kCDRAwbFOmUAAAAC/hillary-clinton-hillbilly.gif

Longy? Is that you, dear?

Bobby. wrote on Sep 9^th, 2022 at 12:08am:

Dnarever wrote on Sep 9th, 2022 at 12:06am: If you catch a bank robber with the money from a bank robbery do the police then find out why he had taken the money? It makes no difference - Trump has been caught with stolen government documents, there is no excuse and no need to find out why - Just lock him up. You wanna hang em don't you?

I don't support the death penalty.

If you want to hang him on a coat hanger in the closet I am fine with that.