Donald Trump calls for end of US Constitution due to 'massive fraud' in 'false and fraudulent' 2020 presidential election ::) ::)

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 4^th, 2022 at 7:47pm:

Donald Trump calls for end of US Constitution due to 'massive fraud' in 'false and fraudulent' 2020 presidential election ::) ::)

Good point, Brian. The Constitution's been run by some really bad people for so many years. It's time for a change.

Think on it, a prez has to be erected every four years. What's the point of that?

North Korea's doing okay - Kim's a great guy. The Saudis - a great bunch of guys; tough, they drive a hard bargain. And Russia's never done better, believe me. Mr Trump saw Putin on TV recently - genius. He knows Putin well - very, very well.

What's the point of the constitution? It's just a lot of words on paper.

It's about time someone stood up to get rid of it.

I refuse to trust ex-el-presidente Trump to replace it with something which is honest, Karnal.   ::) ::)

Thankfully this is yet more evidence that there's no way the failed
former president could hope to run, and win, in 2024.  My guess is
that he's suffering from early onset dementia, and there've been
several recent instances where his lack of fine motor control has
also been apparent.

He's still pushing his absurd theory that the election was rigged, and
that was why he lost in an 8 million vote landslide win for Biden.  His
mental faculties have obviously deteriorated to the extent that he's
unable to think clearly, or make rational decisions affecting his future.

In two years' time, he'll simply be in no condition to run as a POTUS
candidate—either physically or mentally.  As even more GOP members
desert him, the rusted-on remainder who'll support him in 2024 will
no doubt experience much embarrassment if eventually he does decide
to make a run for the White House.     And loses by 80 million votes.

https://i.postimg.cc/bvxWN2jm/Screenshot-2022-12-04-at-21-45-21-maxresdefault-jpg-JPEG-Image-1280-720-pixels.png


Well, there's a couple of answers to this question.

The first?   Most 2- or 3-year-old children.  Secondly?   Old folks suffering dementia.

      ;D    ;D    ;D

AusGeoff wrote on Dec 4^th, 2022 at 8:51pm:

Thankfully this is yet more evidence that there's no way the failed former president could hope to run, and win, in 2024.  My guess is that he's suffering from early onset dementia, and there've been several recent instances where his lack of fine motor control has also been apparent. He's still pushing his absurd theory that the election was rigged, and that was why he lost in an 8 million vote landslide win for Biden.  His mental faculties have obviously deteriorated to the extent that he's unable to think clearly, or make rational decisions affecting his future. In two years' time, he'll simply be in no condition to run as a POTUS candidate—either physically or mentally.  As even more GOP members desert him, the rusted-on remainder who'll support him in 2024 will no doubt experience much embarrassment if eventually he does decide to make a run for the White House.     And loses by 80 million votes. https://i.postimg.cc/bvxWN2jm/Screenshot-2022-12-04-at-21-45-21-maxresdefault-jpg-JPEG-Image-1280-720-pixels.png Well, there's a couple of answers to this question. The first?   Most 2- or 3-year-old children.  Secondly?   Old folks suffering dementia.       ;D    ;D    ;D

If you watch the whole episode you see Trump attempt to lift the bottle with his right hand but it stalls about half way. He then brings the other hand into play to push his right arm up to him mouth.

Loss of strength & flexibility in the right are typical of a stroke victim among other issues.

Interesting was that the next week obviously following a week of physio Trump was showing off his new found ability to drink water as if it were an achievement of some note.

Most people don't see it as an achievement in anyone over 3 years of age let alone staging a press conference specifically to show it off.

Dnarever wrote on Dec 5^th, 2022 at 9:07am:

AusGeoff wrote on Dec 4th, 2022 at 8:51pm: Thankfully this is yet more evidence that there's no way the failed former president could hope to run, and win, in 2024.  My guess is that he's suffering from early onset dementia, and there've been several recent instances where his lack of fine motor control has also been apparent. He's still pushing his absurd theory that the election was rigged, and that was why he lost in an 8 million vote landslide win for Biden.  His mental faculties have obviously deteriorated to the extent that he's unable to think clearly, or make rational decisions affecting his future. In two years' time, he'll simply be in no condition to run as a POTUS candidate—either physically or mentally.  As even more GOP members desert him, the rusted-on remainder who'll support him in 2024 will no doubt experience much embarrassment if eventually he does decide to make a run for the White House.     And loses by 80 million votes. https://i.postimg.cc/bvxWN2jm/Screenshot-2022-12-04-at-21-45-21-maxresdefault-jpg-JPEG-Image-1280-720-pixels.png Well, there's a couple of answers to this question. The first?   Most 2- or 3-year-old children.  Secondly?   Old folks suffering dementia.       ;D    ;D    ;D If you watch the whole episode you see Trump attempt to lift the bottle with his right hand but it stalls about half way. He then brings the other hand into play to push his right arm up to him mouth. Loss of strength & flexibility in the right are typical of a stroke victim among other issues. Interesting was that the next week obviously following a week of physio Trump was showing off his new found ability to drink water as if it were an achievement on some note. Most people don't see it as an achievement in anyone over 3 years of age.

He can hold a glass with two hands AND remember five simple words.

A true genius.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhZyHIZpzoM

AusGeoff wrote on Dec 4^th, 2022 at 8:51pm:

Thankfully this is yet more evidence that there's no way the failed former president could hope to run, and win, in 2024.  My guess is that he's suffering from early onset dementia, and there've been several recent instances where his lack of fine motor control has also been apparent. He's still pushing his absurd theory that the election was rigged, and that was why he lost in an 8 million vote landslide win for Biden.  His mental faculties have obviously deteriorated to the extent that he's unable to think clearly, or make rational decisions affecting his future. In two years' time, he'll simply be in no condition to run as a POTUS candidate—either physically or mentally.  As even more GOP members desert him, the rusted-on remainder who'll support him in 2024 will no doubt experience much embarrassment if eventually he does decide to make a run for the White House.     And loses by 80 million votes. https://i.postimg.cc/bvxWN2jm/Screenshot-2022-12-04-at-21-45-21-maxresdefault-jpg-JPEG-Image-1280-720-pixels.png Well, there's a couple of answers to this question. The first?   Most 2- or 3-year-old children.  Secondly?   Old folks suffering dementia.       ;D    ;D    ;D

I thought it was a trick question as I could see Donald in the picture.

Donald is the king of firsts for a President.

First president to fail at drinking water.

And the little red-haired Saxon will destroy the old corrupt ways, while his tall blonde Anglo team-mate will create the New future of American Politics.

Out with the Blue North and Grey South Politics and in with the Red East and White West(ern) Politics.

;)  ;D

Dnarever wrote on Dec 5^th, 2022 at 9:11am:

AusGeoff wrote on Dec 4th, 2022 at 8:51pm: Thankfully this is yet more evidence that there's no way the failed former president could hope to run, and win, in 2024.  My guess is that he's suffering from early onset dementia, and there've been several recent instances where his lack of fine motor control has also been apparent. He's still pushing his absurd theory that the election was rigged, and that was why he lost in an 8 million vote landslide win for Biden.  His mental faculties have obviously deteriorated to the extent that he's unable to think clearly, or make rational decisions affecting his future. In two years' time, he'll simply be in no condition to run as a POTUS candidate—either physically or mentally.  As even more GOP members desert him, the rusted-on remainder who'll support him in 2024 will no doubt experience much embarrassment if eventually he does decide to make a run for the White House.     And loses by 80 million votes. https://i.postimg.cc/bvxWN2jm/Screenshot-2022-12-04-at-21-45-21-maxresdefault-jpg-JPEG-Image-1280-720-pixels.png Well, there's a couple of answers to this question. The first?   Most 2- or 3-year-old children.  Secondly?   Old folks suffering dementia.       ;D    ;D    ;D I thought it was a trick question as I could see Donald in the picture. Donald is the king of firsts for a President. First president to fail at drinking water.

First to be impeached twice.

The Democrat Party colluded with Twitter to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story before the 2020 election.

And with FB, Google, NTY, CNN, NPR etc, etc, etc.

Donald Trump has suggested a "termination" of the US Constitution, earning a sharp rebuke from the White House as the former president revisits debunked conspiracy theories about the 2020 election that he lost.

Moving closer to that dictatorship he so desires.

Frank wrote on Dec 5^th, 2022 at 12:28pm:

The Democrat Party colluded with Twitter to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story before the 2020 election. And with FB, Google, NTY, CNN, NPR etc, etc, etc.

Cool story, bro

Frank wrote on Dec 5^th, 2022 at 12:28pm:

The Democrat Party colluded with Twitter to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story before the 2020 election. And with FB, Google, NTY, CNN, NPR etc, etc, etc.

Oh? And what about Tucker?

https://www.thedailybeast.com/tucker-carlson-suddenly-says-its-time-to-leave-hunter-biden-alone

More proof, yet again, that the very opposite of what you say is true. It's like a Danish version of Alice in Wonderland.

You.

Marla wrote on Dec 5^th, 2022 at 1:02pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 5th, 2022 at 12:28pm: The Democrat Party colluded with Twitter to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story before the 2020 election. And with FB, Google, NTY, CNN, NPR etc, etc, etc. Cool story, bro

I know. Colluding while Tucker ran it for a week, then - poof!

Tucker says it's time to leave Hunter Biden alone, poor thing.

Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 5^th, 2022 at 1:07pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 5th, 2022 at 12:28pm: The Democrat Party colluded with Twitter to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story before the 2020 election. And with FB, Google, NTY, CNN, NPR etc, etc, etc. Oh? And what about Tucker? https://www.thedailybeast.com/tucker-carlson-suddenly-says-its-time-to-leave-hunter-biden-alone More proof, yet again, that the very opposite of what you say is true. It's like a Danish version of Alice in Wonderland. You.

Paki bollox, Mustaphaken. This story has developed significantly since 30 Oct 2020.

The 'expert class' certified it as a Russian operation. It wasn't. But then it was the same 'expert class in the "intelligence community'"   ;D ;D who said the Taliban will not dominate Rubbleistan. The "intelligence community' that sold Hillary the Russia dossier wheeze. Ludicrous.


Big Tech and Big Media have always colluded with the Dems, they always do and 2020 was no different. This release of evidence is just that - more evidence.

Frank wrote on Dec 5^th, 2022 at 12:28pm:

The Democrat Party colluded with Twitter to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story before the 2020 election. And with FB, Google, NTY, CNN, NPR etc, etc, etc.

A nothing burger.

A few facts about that.

1. The trump team also had twitter stories removed in the same way.

2. The Items the Democrats asked to be removed were items that were in breach of twitter policy and should have been removed anyway, they were basically nude pictures of Hunter.

In short it is a nothing story.

Marla wrote on Dec 5^th, 2022 at 1:02pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 5th, 2022 at 12:28pm: The Democrat Party colluded with Twitter to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story before the 2020 election. And with FB, Google, NTY, CNN, NPR etc, etc, etc. Cool story, bro

Not sure how cool untrue stories can be.

Bye bye Blue North Democrats.
You shouldn't have killed your Grey South Confederate brother.
Now you're all alone and you'll hang by your own noose that you'll tie for yourself.

Dnarever wrote on Dec 5^th, 2022 at 2:33pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 5th, 2022 at 12:28pm: The Democrat Party colluded with Twitter to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story before the 2020 election. And with FB, Google, NTY, CNN, NPR etc, etc, etc. A nothing burger. A few facts about that. 1. The trump team also had twitter stories removed in the same way. 2. The Items the Democrats asked to be removed were items that were in breach of twitter policy and should have been removed anyway, they were basically nude pictured of Hunter. In short it is a nothing story.

;D ;D  The unique, wholly original voice of duckwittery!!  ^^^^^

Glenn Greenwald
The reason these people insist Taibbi's story is trivial is they will not and cannot recognize any scandalous or improper behavior by leading Dem politicians. Ask them to name any. Any critique of leading Dems is automatically, to them, a fraud, a "nothingburger." They're Dems.


Ecclesiasticus44
Everything you need to know about the people declaring “nothingburger” on Taibbi is that they say with a straight face “lol
he thinks that 99% of Twitter employee donations going to Democrats is somehow evidence of bias”

Konstantin Kisin
Absolutely fascinating reading the critical replies:

1. They overwhelmingly use the same language "nothingburger", "PR for billionaire" etc. It's legit NPC territory.

2. They all deliberately misrepresent the issue. It's not about the First Amendment. The question is: does the company which operates the digital public square get to put a thumb on the scales in the middle of an election?  I couldn't give a poo  about Hunter Biden's drug and sex binges. He seems like a deeply troubled human being that deserves compassion and pity. Doesn't mean he isn't acting like a scumbag but his immorality isn't relevant. The NY Post story credibly alleged financial links between HB and JB in relation to HB's obviously corrupt dealings in Ukraine and China.
Suppressing that story in the run-up to an election was election interference EVEN IF IT WAS FALSE. It is not the job of Twitter to adjudicate the factual accuracy of newspaper stories.

3. If you're one of these NPC types (like ducksit, Mustaphaken, gweggy tujd eg al) conduct a simple thought experiment: imagine that on the eve of the 2024 election between Joe Biden and Donald Trump, the New York Times publishes a story about Donald Trump Jr. being a crackhead, prostitute user and involved in shady dealings in foreign countries with the allegation that Trump Sr is involved. And Elon Musk suppresses it. See it now?

4. They deliberately ignore the obvious and deeply troubling collusion between "former intelligence officers", the mainstream media and Big Tech, whereby "former intelligence officers" brazenly lied that the story was Russian misinformation, the mainstream media pushed their lies and helped Big Tech to justify their unprecedented meddling in the electoral process.

5. They also ignore the consequences. Whether you think the Hunter Biden laptop story should have affected how people voted, we know from subsequent polling (and common sense) that had voters been fully aware of the story some would have made a different voting decision.  Pretending this is a "nothingburger" story about "Hunter Biden's dick pics" isn't persuasive to anyone looking at this objectively.  It's in the interests of everyone, left, right, up and down, to roll back the incestuous collusion between government, corporate media and Big Tech. You have to be absolutely blinded by partisanship not to see this.
https://mobile.twitter.com/KonstantinKisin/status/1599412760474894336

Where are all the idiotic trumpards to defend this latest stupidity? Surely sorends not the only one dumb enough to try to defend this ?

John Smith wrote on Dec 5^th, 2022 at 6:43pm:

Where are all the idiotic trumpards to defend this latest stupidity? Surely sorends not the only one dumb enough to try to defend this ?

Ah, another intelligent one liner from Mimo Mafioso - full of facts, personality and basically like a $40 meal in a restaurant with just a piece of lettuce on it.  ;D

Frank wrote on Dec 5^th, 2022 at 2:25pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 5th, 2022 at 1:07pm: Frank wrote on Dec 5th, 2022 at 12:28pm: The Democrat Party colluded with Twitter to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story before the 2020 election. And with FB, Google, NTY, CNN, NPR etc, etc, etc. Oh? And what about Tucker? https://www.thedailybeast.com/tucker-carlson-suddenly-says-its-time-to-leave-hunter-biden-alone More proof, yet again, that the very opposite of what you say is true. It's like a Danish version of Alice in Wonderland. You. Paki bollox, Mustaphaken. This story has developed significantly since 30 Oct 2020. The 'expert class' certified it as a Russian operation. It wasn't. But then it was the same 'expert class in the "intelligence community'"   ;D ;D who said the Taliban will not dominate Rubbleistan. The "intelligence community' that sold Hillary the Russia dossier wheeze. Ludicrous. Big Tech and Big Media have always colluded with the Dems, they always do and 2020 was no different. This release of evidence is just that - more evidence.

That's right, old boy. Tucker blamed the courier company for stealing his flash drive, remember? Deep State!

Turns out it was in the mail room the whole time. Tucker kept stalling for time on his BREAKING scoop on Hunter's sex-capades, night after night, until - poof!

Hunter deserves our love and support. If we prick him, does he not bleed? No, Tucker doesn't want to see a media pile-on, so unfair. Where's the humanity, people?

Remember, old boy, Tucker's your go-to guy for "facts". Our ABC? Lies. Tucker tells it like it is.

Alas, old boy, you've cried wolf so many times no one's buying your wares. You're still spruiking stale, fake stats debunked in 2020. You, Tucker, your poor Dear Leader, who's currently facing three to five on an amendment to the Espionage Act he signed into being himself.

Ever get the feeling you've been cheated?

John Smith wrote on Dec 5^th, 2022 at 6:43pm:

Where are all the idiotic trumpards to defend this latest stupidity? Surely sorends not the only one dumb enough to try to defend this ?

Not at all, JS, the gang's all here.

Life is a barrel of fun, no?

Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 5^th, 2022 at 8:15pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 5th, 2022 at 2:25pm: Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 5th, 2022 at 1:07pm: Frank wrote on Dec 5th, 2022 at 12:28pm: The Democrat Party colluded with Twitter to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story before the 2020 election. And with FB, Google, NTY, CNN, NPR etc, etc, etc. Oh? And what about Tucker? https://www.thedailybeast.com/tucker-carlson-suddenly-says-its-time-to-leave-hunter-biden-alone More proof, yet again, that the very opposite of what you say is true. It's like a Danish version of Alice in Wonderland. You. Paki bollox, Mustaphaken. This story has developed significantly since 30 Oct 2020. The 'expert class' certified it as a Russian operation. It wasn't. But then it was the same 'expert class in the "intelligence community'"   ;D ;D who said the Taliban will not dominate Rubbleistan. The "intelligence community' that sold Hillary the Russia dossier wheeze. Ludicrous. Big Tech and Big Media have always colluded with the Dems, they always do and 2020 was no different. This release of evidence is just that - more evidence. That's right, old boy. Tucker blamed the courier company for stealing his flash drive, remember? Deep State! Turns out it was in the mail room the whole time. Tucker kept stalling for time on his BREAKING scoop on Hunter's sex-capades, night after night, until - poof! Hunter deserves our love and support. If we prick him, does he not bleed? No, Tucker doesn't want to see a media pile-on, so unfair. Where's the humanity, people? Remember, old boy, Tucker's your go-to guy for "facts". Our ABC? Lies. Tucker tells it like it is. Alas, old boy, you've cried wolf so many times no one's buying your wares. You're still spruiking stale, fake stats debunked in 2020. You, Tucker, your poor Dear Leader, who a little birdie tells me has a few legal problems on the burner. Ever get the feeling you've been cheated?

That's enough whacky-paki bollocks from you, Mustaphaken.

None of this is going your demented, rabies infected ways.  You are found out, you have always been known to be dishonest liars to your core, now it's out, so tapdance away, we'll stick 10 rupee notes in your knickers, paki. Start dancing.

Glenn Greenwald
The reason these people insist Taibbi's story is trivial is they will not and cannot recognize any scandalous or improper behavior by leading Dem politicians. Ask them to name any. Any critique of leading Dems is automatically, to them, a fraud, a "nothingburger." They're Dems.


Ecclesiasticus44
Everything you need to know about the people declaring “nothingburger” on Taibbi is that they say with a straight face “lol
he thinks that 99% of Twitter employee donations going to Democrats is somehow evidence of bias”

Konstantin Kisin
Absolutely fascinating reading the critical replies:

1. They overwhelmingly use the same language "nothingburger", "PR for billionaire" etc. It's legit NPC territory.

2. They all deliberately misrepresent the issue. It's not about the First Amendment. The question is: does the company which operates the digital public square get to put a thumb on the scales in the middle of an election?  I couldn't give a poo  about Hunter Biden's drug and sex binges. He seems like a deeply troubled human being that deserves compassion and pity. Doesn't mean he isn't acting like a scumbag but his immorality isn't relevant. The NY Post story credibly alleged financial links between HB and JB in relation to HB's obviously corrupt dealings in Ukraine and China.
Suppressing that story in the run-up to an election was election interference EVEN IF IT WAS FALSE. It is not the job of Twitter to adjudicate the factual accuracy of newspaper stories.

3. If you're one of these NPC types (like ducksit, Mustaphaken, gweggy tujd eg al) conduct a simple thought experiment: imagine that on the eve of the 2024 election between Joe Biden and Donald Trump, the New York Times publishes a story about Donald Trump Jr. being a crackhead, prostitute user and involved in shady dealings in foreign countries with the allegation that Trump Sr is involved. And Elon Musk suppresses it. See it now?

4. They deliberately ignore the obvious and deeply troubling collusion between "former intelligence officers", the mainstream media and Big Tech, whereby "former intelligence officers" brazenly lied that the story was Russian misinformation, the mainstream media pushed their lies and helped Big Tech to justify their unprecedented meddling in the electoral process.

5. They also ignore the consequences. Whether you think the Hunter Biden laptop story should have affected how people voted, we know from subsequent polling (and common sense) that had voters been fully aware of the story some would have made a different voting decision.  Pretending this is a "nothingburger" story about "Hunter Biden's dick pics" isn't persuasive to anyone looking at this objectively.  It's in the interests of everyone, left, right, up and down, to roll back the incestuous collusion between government, corporate media and Big Tech. You have to be absolutely blinded by partisanship not to see this.
https://mobile.twitter.com/KonstantinKisin/status/1599412760474894336

Frank wrote on Dec 5^th, 2022 at 8:21pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 5th, 2022 at 8:15pm: Frank wrote on Dec 5th, 2022 at 2:25pm: Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 5th, 2022 at 1:07pm: Frank wrote on Dec 5th, 2022 at 12:28pm: The Democrat Party colluded with Twitter to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story before the 2020 election. And with FB, Google, NTY, CNN, NPR etc, etc, etc. Oh? And what about Tucker? https://www.thedailybeast.com/tucker-carlson-suddenly-says-its-time-to-leave-hunter-biden-alone More proof, yet again, that the very opposite of what you say is true. It's like a Danish version of Alice in Wonderland. You. Paki bollox, Mustaphaken. This story has developed significantly since 30 Oct 2020. The 'expert class' certified it as a Russian operation. It wasn't. But then it was the same 'expert class in the "intelligence community'"   ;D ;D who said the Taliban will not dominate Rubbleistan. The "intelligence community' that sold Hillary the Russia dossier wheeze. Ludicrous. Big Tech and Big Media have always colluded with the Dems, they always do and 2020 was no different. This release of evidence is just that - more evidence. That's right, old boy. Tucker blamed the courier company for stealing his flash drive, remember? Deep State! Turns out it was in the mail room the whole time. Tucker kept stalling for time on his BREAKING scoop on Hunter's sex-capades, night after night, until - poof! Hunter deserves our love and support. If we prick him, does he not bleed? No, Tucker doesn't want to see a media pile-on, so unfair. Where's the humanity, people? Remember, old boy, Tucker's your go-to guy for "facts". Our ABC? Lies. Tucker tells it like it is. Alas, old boy, you've cried wolf so many times no one's buying your wares. You're still spruiking stale, fake stats debunked in 2020. You, Tucker, your poor Dear Leader, who a little birdie tells me has a few legal problems on the burner. Ever get the feeling you've been cheated? That's enough whacky-paki bollocks from you, Mustaphaken. None of this is going your demented, rabies infected ways.  You are found out, you have always been known to be dishonest liars to your core, now it's out, so tapdance away, we'll stick 10 rupee notes in your knickers, paki. Start dancing.

Never stop dancing, old boy. Here's the punch-line: Tucker still owes Hunter a favour!


Quote:

As Tucker Carlson asked Hunter Biden for help getting his son into an elite Washington university in 2014, the Fox News host’s wife, Susie, reportedly wrote in an email: “Tucker and I have the greatest respect and admiration for you. Always!” According to the Post, Tucker Carlson wrote: “I can’t thank you enough for writing that letter to Georgetown on Bucky’s behalf. So nice of you. I know it’ll help. Hope you’re great and we can all get dinner soon.”

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/may/19/tucker-carlson-hunter-biden-georgetown-emails


Quote:

On the same January 2020 show, Carlson said: “In America today, there’s nothing illegal about paying de facto bribes by handing fake jobs to the unqualified family members of powerful people. And since it is perfectly legal, naturally, Hunter Biden isn’t the only one shamelessly cashing in on his family name.”

Sorry, old boy, you were saying?

75% of Trumps family working in the white house with less than a half of a qualification between the lot of them, some couldn't even get a security clearance and the President has proven that he could not be trusted with a security clearance.

If re elected how do they re new his clearance ? He should be rejected with his record of secret document theft.

Frank wrote on Dec 5^th, 2022 at 8:24pm:

Glenn Greenwald The reason these people insist Taibbi's story is trivial is they will not and cannot recognize any scandalous or improper behavior by leading Dem politicians. Ask them to name any. Any critique of leading Dems is automatically, to them, a fraud, a "nothingburger." They're Dems. Ecclesiasticus44 Everything you need to know about the people declaring “nothingburger” on Taibbi is that they say with a straight face “lol he thinks that 99% of Twitter employee donations going to Democrats is somehow evidence of bias” Konstantin Kisin Absolutely fascinating reading the critical replies: 1. They overwhelmingly use the same language "nothingburger", "PR for billionaire" etc. It's legit NPC territory. 2. They all deliberately misrepresent the issue. It's not about the First Amendment. The question is: does the company which operates the digital public square get to put a thumb on the scales in the middle of an election?  I couldn't give a poo  about Hunter Biden's drug and sex binges. He seems like a deeply troubled human being that deserves compassion and pity. Doesn't mean he isn't acting like a scumbag but his immorality isn't relevant. The NY Post story credibly alleged financial links between HB and JB in relation to HB's obviously corrupt dealings in Ukraine and China. Suppressing that story in the run-up to an election was election interference EVEN IF IT WAS FALSE. It is not the job of Twitter to adjudicate the factual accuracy of newspaper stories. 3. If you're one of these NPC types (like ducksit, Mustaphaken, gweggy tujd eg al) conduct a simple thought experiment: imagine that on the eve of the 2024 election between Joe Biden and Donald Trump, the New York Times publishes a story about Donald Trump Jr. being a crackhead, prostitute user and involved in shady dealings in foreign countries with the allegation that Trump Sr is involved. And Elon Musk suppresses it. See it now? 4. They deliberately ignore the obvious and deeply troubling collusion between "former intelligence officers", the mainstream media and Big Tech, whereby "former intelligence officers" brazenly lied that the story was Russian misinformation, the mainstream media pushed their lies and helped Big Tech to justify their unprecedented meddling in the electoral process. 5. They also ignore the consequences. Whether you think the Hunter Biden laptop story should have affected how people voted, we know from subsequent polling (and common sense) that had voters been fully aware of the story some would have made a different voting decision.  Pretending this is a "nothingburger" story about "Hunter Biden's dick pics" isn't persuasive to anyone looking at this objectively.  It's in the interests of everyone, left, right, up and down, to roll back the incestuous collusion between government, corporate media and Big Tech. You have to be absolutely blinded by partisanship not to see this. https://mobile.twitter.com/KonstantinKisin/status/1599412760474894336

I remember for years being told by the right that Russia was a nothingburger.

What I find interesting is that none of the die hard true defenders of the Constitution have appeared here to admonish ex-el-presidente Trump, you know like Panther and Mort.  We have to make do with Soren, a retreaded Dane downunder.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   ::) ::)

Jasin wrote on Dec 5^th, 2022 at 7:33pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 5th, 2022 at 6:43pm: Where are all the idiotic trumpards to defend this latest stupidity? Surely sorends not the only one dumb enough to try to defend this ? Ah, another intelligent one liner from Mimo Mafioso - full of facts, personality and basically like a $40 meal in a restaurant with just a piece of lettuce on it.  ;D

Quote:

Ah, another intelligent one liner

Your safe there JaSin you will never be accused of posting another of those.

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 5^th, 2022 at 8:54pm:

What I find interesting is that none of the die hard true defenders of the Constitution have appeared here to admonish ex-el-presidente Trump, you know like Panther and Mort.  We have to make do with Soren, a retreaded Dane downunder.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   ::) ::)

No none of them supported the emoluments clause either, the constitutional support is only claimed when convenient. They were all happy to support the insurrection and were on board with destroying US democracy. I am sure that some think that the constitution is the remnants of second amendment and the rest does not matter.

Dnarever wrote on Dec 5^th, 2022 at 9:01pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 5th, 2022 at 8:54pm: What I find interesting is that none of the die hard true defenders of the Constitution have appeared here to admonish ex-el-presidente Trump, you know like Panther and Mort.  We have to make do with Soren, a retreaded Dane downunder.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   ::) ::) No none of them supported the emoluments clause either, the constitutional support is only claimed when convenient. They were all happy to support the insurrection and were on board with destroying US democracy. I am sure that some think that the constitution is the remnants of second amendment and the rest does not matter.

Ahhhh....  maiden aunts communing.... isn't it lively, possums? Aunt Bbwian and Aunty Duckwit.
Welcome to country - sorry - mmh.. welcome to country one.

Dnarever wrote on Dec 5^th, 2022 at 9:01pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 5th, 2022 at 8:54pm: What I find interesting is that none of the die hard true defenders of the Constitution have appeared here to admonish ex-el-presidente Trump, you know like Panther and Mort.  We have to make do with Soren, a retreaded Dane downunder.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   ::) ::) No none of them supported the emoluments clause either, the constitutional support is only claimed when convenient. They were all happy to support the insurrection and were on board with destroying US democracy. I am sure that some think that the constitution is the remnants of second amendment and the rest does not matter.

They want a fascist dictatorship.

They're too cowardly to come right out and say it though.

Frank wrote on Dec 5^th, 2022 at 9:19pm:

Dnarever wrote on Dec 5th, 2022 at 9:01pm: Brian Ross wrote on Dec 5th, 2022 at 8:54pm: What I find interesting is that none of the die hard true defenders of the Constitution have appeared here to admonish ex-el-presidente Trump, you know like Panther and Mort.  We have to make do with Soren, a retreaded Dane downunder.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   ::) ::) No none of them supported the emoluments clause either, the constitutional support is only claimed when convenient. They were all happy to support the insurrection and were on board with destroying US democracy. I am sure that some think that the constitution is the remnants of second amendment and the rest does not matter. Ahhhh....  maiden aunts communing.... isn't it lively, possums? Aunt Bbwian and Aunty Duckwit. Welcome to country - sorry - mmh.. welcome to country one.

Welcome to, er, I like Danish, no?

You'll eat it and you'll like it.

---

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 5^th, 2022 at 10:46pm:

Dnarever wrote on Dec 5th, 2022 at 9:01pm: Brian Ross wrote on Dec 5th, 2022 at 8:54pm: What I find interesting is that none of the die hard true defenders of the Constitution have appeared here to admonish ex-el-presidente Trump, you know like Panther and Mort.  We have to make do with Soren, a retreaded Dane downunder.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   ::) ::) No none of them supported the emoluments clause either, the constitutional support is only claimed when convenient. They were all happy to support the insurrection and were on board with destroying US democracy. I am sure that some think that the constitution is the remnants of second amendment and the rest does not matter. They want a fascist dictatorship. They're too cowardly to come right out and say it though.

That is not entirely correct. They are prepared to say it, in circumstances that suit them, among themselves etc., but they are perfectly capable, like Putin, to propose fascist policies while accusing their opposition of fascism.

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 4^th, 2022 at 7:47pm:

Donald Trump calls for end of US Constitution due to 'massive fraud' in 'false and fraudulent' 2020 presidential election ::) ::)

A very dishonest, Bbwianesque smug/shifty headline by the ABC.

He said it was time to "throw out" the 2020 presidential election results or to hold a "new election".

"A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social.

It is the massive fraud by the Dems that allows the Dems to ignore and terminate all rules.  He wasn't "calling for an end", he was accusing the Dems of terminating every rule, even those found in the constitution.

You must be as smug, shifty and resolutely dishonest as Bbwian et al to twist that into Trump "calling for the end of the constitution".

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 5^th, 2022 at 10:46pm:

Dnarever wrote on Dec 5th, 2022 at 9:01pm: Brian Ross wrote on Dec 5th, 2022 at 8:54pm: What I find interesting is that none of the die hard true defenders of the Constitution have appeared here to admonish ex-el-presidente Trump, you know like Panther and Mort.  We have to make do with Soren, a retreaded Dane downunder.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   ::) ::) No none of them supported the emoluments clause either, the constitutional support is only claimed when convenient. They were all happy to support the insurrection and were on board with destroying US democracy. I am sure that some think that the constitution is the remnants of second amendment and the rest does not matter. They want a fascist dictatorship. They're too cowardly to come right out and say it though.

DNC, Media Collude To Suppress Story About DNC, Media Colluding To Suppress Story

U.S. — This weekend, Twitter CEO Elon Musk directed the release of documents and emails showing collusion between the media and the DNC to suppress a major news story. The DNC and media have responded to the DNC/media collusion story by colluding to suppress the story about their collusion.

"It's important to understand this story of how we colluded with the DNC to suppress important information about Presidential candidate corruption is a big nothingburger," said a member of the DNC, reading several talking points given to him by the media. "We have been assured by our partners in the media that they will not be covering this story, exactly as we requested."

The DNC spokesperson then shouted the word "Democracy!" before turning and running headfirst into the glass door of the DNC headquarters.

Insiders with both the DNC and the media announced they will continue to collude with each other as long as they get away with it, or everyone stops listening to them — whichever comes first. "We will not stop doing this as long as it benefits us, and also we're not doing it," said the DNC spokesperson.

At publishing time, the media and DNC had confirmed they would also be suppressing the story about their collusion to suppress the original collusion to suppress the news story.





Satire nails you exactly, ludicrous cockwombles, pillocks, wazzocks and tujds.  ;D ;D ;D

Frank wrote on Dec 6^th, 2022 at 9:28am:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 4th, 2022 at 7:47pm: Donald Trump calls for end of US Constitution due to 'massive fraud' in 'false and fraudulent' 2020 presidential election ::) ::) A very dishonest, Bbwianesque smug/shifty headline by the ABC. He said it was time to "throw out" the 2020 presidential election results or to hold a "new election". "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. It is the massive fraud by the Dems that allows the Dems to ignore and terminate all rules.  He wasn't "calling for an end", he was accusing the Dems of terminating every rule, even those found in the constitution. You must be as smug, shifty and resolutely dishonest as Bbwian et al to twist that into Trump "calling for the end of the constitution".

Nice try Frank, but you are full of poo.

PALM BEACH (The Borowitz Report)—Donald J. Trump clarified his call for the termination of the United States Constitution by indicating that he would abolish the entire document except for the Fifth Amendment.

“I haven’t read the Constitution, but, from what I’ve been told, most of it is a waste of paper, quite frankly,” he told the One America News Network. “The Fifth Amendment is the only part worth saving.”

Trump said that the Fifth Amendment was “maybe the most beautiful amendment ever written,” and noted that he had used it “many, many times.”

“When I left office, I took a lot of documents with me, but I had no interest in taking the Constitution,” he said. “If I could have cut the Fifth Amendment out of the Constitution and put it in my pocket, I would have done that, but the rest of it was written by a bunch of dummies. A bunch of dummies.”

Maybe its time for you Frank to go back to English comprehension class  ;D ;D ;D ;D

scope wrote on Dec 6^th, 2022 at 9:48am:

Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:28am: Brian Ross wrote on Dec 4th, 2022 at 7:47pm: Donald Trump calls for end of US Constitution due to 'massive fraud' in 'false and fraudulent' 2020 presidential election ::) ::) A very dishonest, Bbwianesque smug/shifty headline by the ABC. He said it was time to "throw out" the 2020 presidential election results or to hold a "new election". "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. It is the massive fraud by the Dems that allows the Dems to ignore and terminate all rules.  He wasn't "calling for an end", he was accusing the Dems of terminating every rule, even those found in the constitution. You must be as smug, shifty and resolutely dishonest as Bbwian et al to twist that into Trump "calling for the end of the constitution". Nice try Frank, but you are full of poo. PALM BEACH (The Borowitz Report)—Donald J. Trump clarified his call for the termination of the United States Constitution by indicating that he would abolish the entire document except for the Fifth Amendment. “I haven’t read the Constitution, but, from what I’ve been told, most of it is a waste of paper, quite frankly,” he told the One America News Network. “The Fifth Amendment is the only part worth saving.” Trump said that the Fifth Amendment was “maybe the most beautiful amendment ever written,” and noted that he had used it “many, many times.” “When I left office, I took a lot of documents with me, but I had no interest in taking the Constitution,” he said. “If I could have cut the Fifth Amendment out of the Constitution and put it in my pocket, I would have done that, but the rest of it was written by a bunch of dummies. A bunch of dummies.” Maybe its time for you Frank to go back to English comprehension class  ;D ;D ;D ;D

Satire from the Borowitz Report
Not the news.
https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report

Frank wrote on Dec 6^th, 2022 at 9:28am:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 4th, 2022 at 7:47pm: Donald Trump calls for end of US Constitution due to 'massive fraud' in 'false and fraudulent' 2020 presidential election ::) ::) A very dishonest, Bbwianesque smug/shifty headline by the ABC. He said it was time to "throw out" the 2020 presidential election results or to hold a "new election". "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. It is the massive fraud by the Dems that allows the Dems to ignore and terminate all rules.  He wasn't "calling for an end", he was accusing the Dems of terminating every rule, even those found in the constitution. You must be as smug, shifty and resolutely dishonest as Bbwian et al to twist that into Trump "calling for the end of the constitution".

Trump Says To Drink Lots Of Water -  Media Reports He Told Everyone To Drown Themselves


WASHINGTON, D.C. - At his press conference last night, President Trump told everyone to stay hydrated and drink lots of water.

"Water's tremendous, very powerful stuff," he said. "You won't believe the things they can do with water. Water balloons. Water slides. Water beds. It's amazing. You can freeze it and make ice, I'm told. Ice is great for lots of things. Ice cream. Ice cubes. Igloos."

"Anyway, drink water."

Horrified journalists scrambled to warn Americans not to drown themselves in their pools and bathtubs.

"Trump says water is good -- but this is very misleading," said Rachel Maddow. "Did you know that water kills many people every year? These dangerous, unhinged remarks from the president could cause many to drown themselves. Plus, do you know what's hidden in water? Sharks. This president wants you to die from a shark attack!"

Representatives for various bottled water companies quickly released a statement distancing themselves from the president's remarks and warning everyone not to submerge themselves in the ocean for minutes at a time.

Frank wrote on Dec 6^th, 2022 at 9:28am:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 4th, 2022 at 7:47pm: Donald Trump calls for end of US Constitution due to 'massive fraud' in 'false and fraudulent' 2020 presidential election ::) ::) A very dishonest, Bbwianesque smug/shifty headline by the ABC. He said it was time to "throw out" the 2020 presidential election results or to hold a "new election". "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. It is the massive fraud by the Dems that allows the Dems to ignore and terminate all rules.  He wasn't "calling for an end", he was accusing the Dems of terminating every rule, even those found in the constitution. You must be as smug, shifty and resolutely dishonest as Bbwian et al to twist that into Trump "calling for the end of the constitution".

Quote:

termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution,"

Brian's post was mild reasonable and 100% true


Quote:

He said it was time to "throw out" the 2020 presidential election results or to hold a "new election".

Yes but the only way to do this is to throw out the constitution which he went on to say.

Frank wrote on Dec 6^th, 2022 at 9:43am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 5th, 2022 at 10:46pm: Dnarever wrote on Dec 5th, 2022 at 9:01pm: Brian Ross wrote on Dec 5th, 2022 at 8:54pm: What I find interesting is that none of the die hard true defenders of the Constitution have appeared here to admonish ex-el-presidente Trump, you know like Panther and Mort.  We have to make do with Soren, a retreaded Dane downunder.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   ::) ::) No none of them supported the emoluments clause either, the constitutional support is only claimed when convenient. They were all happy to support the insurrection and were on board with destroying US democracy. I am sure that some think that the constitution is the remnants of second amendment and the rest does not matter. They want a fascist dictatorship. They're too cowardly to come right out and say it though. DNC, Media Collude To Suppress Story About DNC, Media Colluding To Suppress Story U.S. — This weekend, Twitter CEO Elon Musk directed the release of documents and emails showing collusion between the media and the DNC to suppress a major news story. The DNC and media have responded to the DNC/media collusion story by colluding to suppress the story about their collusion. "It's important to understand this story of how we colluded with the DNC to suppress important information about Presidential candidate corruption is a big nothingburger," said a member of the DNC, reading several talking points given to him by the media. "We have been assured by our partners in the media that they will not be covering this story, exactly as we requested." The DNC spokesperson then shouted the word "Democracy!" before turning and running headfirst into the glass door of the DNC headquarters. Insiders with both the DNC and the media announced they will continue to collude with each other as long as they get away with it, or everyone stops listening to them — whichever comes first. "We will not stop doing this as long as it benefits us, and also we're not doing it," said the DNC spokesperson. At publishing time, the media and DNC had confirmed they would also be suppressing the story about their collusion to suppress the original collusion to suppress the news story. Satire nails you exactly, ludicrous cockwombles, pillocks, wazzocks and tujds.  ;D ;D ;D

Yes as you say satire, it is sending up the story as a joke. Their slogan is - "Babylon Bee | Fake News You Can Trust" (That is doubtful to put it nicely).

It's right wing satire that they acknowledge as being satire and that's the best you got.

https://babylonbee.com/news/dnc-media-collude-to-suppress-story-about-dnc-media-colluding-to-suppress-story

Dnarever wrote on Dec 6^th, 2022 at 10:58am:

Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:28am: Brian Ross wrote on Dec 4th, 2022 at 7:47pm: Donald Trump calls for end of US Constitution due to 'massive fraud' in 'false and fraudulent' 2020 presidential election ::) ::) A very dishonest, Bbwianesque smug/shifty headline by the ABC. He said it was time to "throw out" the 2020 presidential election results or to hold a "new election". "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. It is the massive fraud by the Dems that allows the Dems to ignore and terminate all rules.  He wasn't "calling for an end", he was accusing the Dems of terminating every rule, even those found in the constitution. You must be as smug, shifty and resolutely dishonest as Bbwian et al to twist that into Trump "calling for the end of the constitution". Quote: termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Brian's post was mild reasonable and 100% true [quote]He said it was time to "throw out" the 2020 presidential election results or to hold a "new election".

Yes but the only way to do this is to throw out the constitution which he went on to say.[/quote]
He did not. he said the Massive Fraud by the Dems allowed them the termination of all rules, including constitutional rules. The fraudulent Dems have terminated all the rules to achieve their massive fraud.

That is the meaning of what he said. He wants the Dems to not cheat but follow the rules, all of them. He called for another election WITHOUT the massive Dem fraud.

You can think what you like about that idea but what he did not say is what the smug/shifty media attribute to him - he said the exact opposite: why have rules, regulations and articles if the Dems are allowed to terminate them all by engaging in a Massive Fraud, aided and promoted by Big Media and Big Tech and Big DOJ/FBI.

Frank wrote on Dec 6^th, 2022 at 11:16am:

Dnarever wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 10:58am: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:28am: Brian Ross wrote on Dec 4th, 2022 at 7:47pm: Donald Trump calls for end of US Constitution due to 'massive fraud' in 'false and fraudulent' 2020 presidential election ::) ::) A very dishonest, Bbwianesque smug/shifty headline by the ABC. He said it was time to "throw out" the 2020 presidential election results or to hold a "new election". "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. It is the massive fraud by the Dems that allows the Dems to ignore and terminate all rules.  He wasn't "calling for an end", he was accusing the Dems of terminating every rule, even those found in the constitution. You must be as smug, shifty and resolutely dishonest as Bbwian et al to twist that into Trump "calling for the end of the constitution". Quote: termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Brian's post was mild reasonable and 100% true [quote]He said it was time to "throw out" the 2020 presidential election results or to hold a "new election". Yes but the only way to do this is to throw out the constitution which he went on to say.

He did not. he said the Massive Fraud by the Dems allowed them the termination of all rules, including constitutional rules. The fraudulent Dems have terminated all the rules to achieve their massive fraud.

That is the meaning of what he said. He wants the Dems to not cheat but follow the rules, all of them. He called for another election WITHOUT the massive Dem fraud.

You can think what you like about that idea but what he did not say is what the smug/shifty media attribute to him - he said the exact opposite: why have rules, regulations and articles if the Dems are allowed to terminate them all by engaging in a Massive Fraud, aided and promoted by Big Media and Big Tech and Big DOJ/FBI.



[/quote]

1) There was no cheating. Its a garbage claim.

2) Massive Fraud by the Dems allowed them the termination of all rules, including constitutional rules.
You keep posting that he said exactly what you are saying that he didn't say. He clearly stated that he wants to turn off the rules in the constitution. You cannot just turn the constitution on and off when you feel like it.

Miranda Devine says that Twitter Files is a nothing burger.

Don't watch Frank you may risk learning something.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BST9J0Z7ug

Dnarever wrote on Dec 6^th, 2022 at 12:00pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 11:16am: He did not. he said the Massive Fraud by the Dems allowed them the termination of all rules, including constitutional rules. The fraudulent Dems have terminated all the rules to achieve their massive fraud. That is the meaning of what he said. He wants the Dems to not cheat but follow the rules, all of them. He called for another election WITHOUT the massive Dem fraud. You can think what you like about that idea but what he did not say is what the smug/shifty media attribute to him - he said the exact opposite: why have rules, regulations and articles if the Dems are allowed to terminate them all by engaging in a Massive Fraud, aided and promoted by Big Media and Big Tech and Big DOJ/FBI. 1) There was no cheating. Its a garbage claim. 2) Massive Fraud by the Dems allowed them the termination of all rules, including constitutional rules. You keep posting that he said exactly what you are saying that he didn't say. He clearly stated that he wants to turn off the rules in the constitution. You cannot just turn the constitution on and off when you feel like it.

Quote him on that, duckwit. Go on, quote his words.

Dnarever wrote on Dec 6^th, 2022 at 12:04pm:

Miranda Devine says that Twitter Files is a nothing burger. Don't watch Frank you may risk learning something. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BST9J0Z7ug

Except she didn't say anything of the sort, duckwit.
She said it is not a smoking gun.

Frank wrote on Dec 6^th, 2022 at 11:16am:

Dnarever wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 10:58am: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:28am: Brian Ross wrote on Dec 4th, 2022 at 7:47pm: Donald Trump calls for end of US Constitution due to 'massive fraud' in 'false and fraudulent' 2020 presidential election ::) ::) A very dishonest, Bbwianesque smug/shifty headline by the ABC. He said it was time to "throw out" the 2020 presidential election results or to hold a "new election". "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. It is the massive fraud by the Dems that allows the Dems to ignore and terminate all rules.  He wasn't "calling for an end", he was accusing the Dems of terminating every rule, even those found in the constitution. You must be as smug, shifty and resolutely dishonest as Bbwian et al to twist that into Trump "calling for the end of the constitution". Quote: termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Brian's post was mild reasonable and 100% true [quote]He said it was time to "throw out" the 2020 presidential election results or to hold a "new election". Yes but the only way to do this is to throw out the constitution which he went on to say.

He did not. he said the Massive Fraud by the Dems allowed them the termination of all rules, including constitutional rules. The fraudulent Dems have terminated all the rules to achieve their massive fraud.

That is the meaning of what he said. He wants the Dems to not cheat but follow the rules, all of them. He called for another election WITHOUT the massive Dem fraud.


[/quote]

There was no fraud.

Over 60 courts determined that, and Rudy - "I was just tucking my shirt in" - Giuliani admitted it himself.

"Giuliani told Arizona official ‘We just don’t have the evidence’ of voter fraud".

Attempting to overturn election results in service of Donald Trump’s lie about voter fraud in his defeat by Joe Biden, the former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani told an Arizona official: “We’ve got lots of theories. We just don’t have the evidence.”

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 6^th, 2022 at 12:08pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 11:16am: Dnarever wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 10:58am: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:28am: Brian Ross wrote on Dec 4th, 2022 at 7:47pm: Donald Trump calls for end of US Constitution due to 'massive fraud' in 'false and fraudulent' 2020 presidential election ::) ::) A very dishonest, Bbwianesque smug/shifty headline by the ABC. He said it was time to "throw out" the 2020 presidential election results or to hold a "new election". "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. It is the massive fraud by the Dems that allows the Dems to ignore and terminate all rules.  He wasn't "calling for an end", he was accusing the Dems of terminating every rule, even those found in the constitution. You must be as smug, shifty and resolutely dishonest as Bbwian et al to twist that into Trump "calling for the end of the constitution". Quote: termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Brian's post was mild reasonable and 100% true [quote]He said it was time to "throw out" the 2020 presidential election results or to hold a "new election". Yes but the only way to do this is to throw out the constitution which he went on to say. He did not. he said the Massive Fraud by the Dems allowed them the termination of all rules, including constitutional rules. The fraudulent Dems have terminated all the rules to achieve their massive fraud. That is the meaning of what he said. He wants the Dems to not cheat but follow the rules, all of them. He called for another election WITHOUT the massive Dem fraud.

There was no fraud.

Over 60 courts determined that, and Rudy - "I was just tucking my shirt in" - Giuliani admitted it himself.

"Giuliani told Arizona official ‘We just don’t have the evidence’ of voter fraud".

Attempting to overturn election results in service of Donald Trump’s lie about voter fraud in his defeat by Joe Biden, the former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani told an Arizona official: “We’ve got lots of theories. We just don’t have the evidence.”

[/quote]


We know you have the Bbwianesque smug and shifties, tujd.


You mean somebody said that Guliani said something about Arizona law.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jun/21/giuliani-no-evidence-voter-fraud-arizona-jan-6-commitee

Frank wrote on Dec 6^th, 2022 at 12:31pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 12:08pm: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 11:16am: Dnarever wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 10:58am: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:28am: Brian Ross wrote on Dec 4th, 2022 at 7:47pm: Donald Trump calls for end of US Constitution due to 'massive fraud' in 'false and fraudulent' 2020 presidential election ::) ::) A very dishonest, Bbwianesque smug/shifty headline by the ABC. He said it was time to "throw out" the 2020 presidential election results or to hold a "new election". "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. It is the massive fraud by the Dems that allows the Dems to ignore and terminate all rules.  He wasn't "calling for an end", he was accusing the Dems of terminating every rule, even those found in the constitution. You must be as smug, shifty and resolutely dishonest as Bbwian et al to twist that into Trump "calling for the end of the constitution". Quote: termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Brian's post was mild reasonable and 100% true [quote]He said it was time to "throw out" the 2020 presidential election results or to hold a "new election". Yes but the only way to do this is to throw out the constitution which he went on to say. He did not. he said the Massive Fraud by the Dems allowed them the termination of all rules, including constitutional rules. The fraudulent Dems have terminated all the rules to achieve their massive fraud. That is the meaning of what he said. He wants the Dems to not cheat but follow the rules, all of them. He called for another election WITHOUT the massive Dem fraud. There was no fraud. Over 60 courts determined that, and Rudy - "I was just tucking my shirt in" - Giuliani admitted it himself. "Giuliani told Arizona official ‘We just don’t have the evidence’ of voter fraud". Attempting to overturn election results in service of Donald Trump’s lie about voter fraud in his defeat by Joe Biden, the former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani told an Arizona official: “We’ve got lots of theories. We just don’t have the evidence.”

We know you have the Bbwianesque smug and shifties, tujd.


You mean somebody said that Guliani said something about Arizona law.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jun/21/giuliani-no-evidence-voter-fraud-arizona-jan-6-commitee
[/quote]

"Giuliani told Arizona official ‘We just don’t have the evidence’ of voter fraud".

Attempting to overturn election results in service of Donald Trump’s lie about voter fraud in his defeat by Joe Biden, the former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani told an Arizona official: “We’ve got lots of theories. We just don’t have the evidence.”

Frank wrote on Dec 6^th, 2022 at 10:13am:

scope wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:48am: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:28am: Brian Ross wrote on Dec 4th, 2022 at 7:47pm: Donald Trump calls for end of US Constitution due to 'massive fraud' in 'false and fraudulent' 2020 presidential election ::) ::) A very dishonest, Bbwianesque smug/shifty headline by the ABC. He said it was time to "throw out" the 2020 presidential election results or to hold a "new election". "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. It is the massive fraud by the Dems that allows the Dems to ignore and terminate all rules.  He wasn't "calling for an end", he was accusing the Dems of terminating every rule, even those found in the constitution. You must be as smug, shifty and resolutely dishonest as Bbwian et al to twist that into Trump "calling for the end of the constitution". Nice try Frank, but you are full of poo. PALM BEACH (The Borowitz Report)—Donald J. Trump clarified his call for the termination of the United States Constitution by indicating that he would abolish the entire document except for the Fifth Amendment. “I haven’t read the Constitution, but, from what I’ve been told, most of it is a waste of paper, quite frankly,” he told the One America News Network. “The Fifth Amendment is the only part worth saving.” Trump said that the Fifth Amendment was “maybe the most beautiful amendment ever written,” and noted that he had used it “many, many times.” “When I left office, I took a lot of documents with me, but I had no interest in taking the Constitution,” he said. “If I could have cut the Fifth Amendment out of the Constitution and put it in my pocket, I would have done that, but the rest of it was written by a bunch of dummies. A bunch of dummies.” Maybe its time for you Frank to go back to English comprehension class  ;D ;D ;D ;D Satire from the Borowitz Report Not the news. https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report

I know its satire Frank, but it changes nothing of my point that you need to go back and do English comprehension again. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

scope wrote on Dec 6^th, 2022 at 1:33pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 10:13am: scope wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:48am: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:28am: Brian Ross wrote on Dec 4th, 2022 at 7:47pm: Donald Trump calls for end of US Constitution due to 'massive fraud' in 'false and fraudulent' 2020 presidential election ::) ::) A very dishonest, Bbwianesque smug/shifty headline by the ABC. He said it was time to "throw out" the 2020 presidential election results or to hold a "new election". "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. It is the massive fraud by the Dems that allows the Dems to ignore and terminate all rules.  He wasn't "calling for an end", he was accusing the Dems of terminating every rule, even those found in the constitution. You must be as smug, shifty and resolutely dishonest as Bbwian et al to twist that into Trump "calling for the end of the constitution". Nice try Frank, but you are full of poo. PALM BEACH (The Borowitz Report)—Donald J. Trump clarified his call for the termination of the United States Constitution by indicating that he would abolish the entire document except for the Fifth Amendment. “I haven’t read the Constitution, but, from what I’ve been told, most of it is a waste of paper, quite frankly,” he told the One America News Network. “The Fifth Amendment is the only part worth saving.” Trump said that the Fifth Amendment was “maybe the most beautiful amendment ever written,” and noted that he had used it “many, many times.” “When I left office, I took a lot of documents with me, but I had no interest in taking the Constitution,” he said. “If I could have cut the Fifth Amendment out of the Constitution and put it in my pocket, I would have done that, but the rest of it was written by a bunch of dummies. A bunch of dummies.” Maybe its time for you Frank to go back to English comprehension class  ;D ;D ;D ;D Satire from the Borowitz Report Not the news. https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report I know its satire Frank, but it changes nothing of my point that you need to go back and do English comprehension again. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Back to Balogney, old boy. Chop chop.

Out with the USSR, CCP, NK and the Gay Democrats with them. ;D ;D

Jasin wrote on Dec 6^th, 2022 at 1:40pm:

Out with the USSR, CCP, NK and the Gay Democrats with them. ;D ;D

That could work, JaSin.

Frank wrote on Dec 6^th, 2022 at 12:06pm:

Dnarever wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 12:00pm: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 11:16am: He did not. he said the Massive Fraud by the Dems allowed them the termination of all rules, including constitutional rules. The fraudulent Dems have terminated all the rules to achieve their massive fraud. That is the meaning of what he said. He wants the Dems to not cheat but follow the rules, all of them. He called for another election WITHOUT the massive Dem fraud. You can think what you like about that idea but what he did not say is what the smug/shifty media attribute to him - he said the exact opposite: why have rules, regulations and articles if the Dems are allowed to terminate them all by engaging in a Massive Fraud, aided and promoted by Big Media and Big Tech and Big DOJ/FBI. 1) There was no cheating. Its a garbage claim. 2) Massive Fraud by the Dems allowed them the termination of all rules, including constitutional rules. You keep posting that he said exactly what you are saying that he didn't say. He clearly stated that he wants to turn off the rules in the constitution. You cannot just turn the constitution on and off when you feel like it. Quote him on that, duckwit. Go on, quote his words.

You already did - its highlighted.

---

Frank wrote on Dec 6^th, 2022 at 12:08pm:

Dnarever wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 12:04pm: Miranda Devine says that Twitter Files is a nothing burger. Don't watch Frank you may risk learning something. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BST9J0Z7ug Except she didn't say anything of the sort, duckwit. She said it is not a smoking gun.

Not a smoking gun - it lacks substance - it does not say what the republicans want it to say - it is an empty burger - "It's a nothing burger"

Virtually all the same thing, she is saying that the republicans want this to say that Biden and the democrats acted improperly and the fact is that it doesn't.

scope wrote on Dec 6^th, 2022 at 1:33pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 10:13am: scope wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:48am: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:28am: Brian Ross wrote on Dec 4th, 2022 at 7:47pm: Donald Trump calls for end of US Constitution due to 'massive fraud' in 'false and fraudulent' 2020 presidential election ::) ::) A very dishonest, Bbwianesque smug/shifty headline by the ABC. He said it was time to "throw out" the 2020 presidential election results or to hold a "new election". "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. It is the massive fraud by the Dems that allows the Dems to ignore and terminate all rules.  He wasn't "calling for an end", he was accusing the Dems of terminating every rule, even those found in the constitution. You must be as smug, shifty and resolutely dishonest as Bbwian et al to twist that into Trump "calling for the end of the constitution". Nice try Frank, but you are full of poo. PALM BEACH (The Borowitz Report)—Donald J. Trump clarified his call for the termination of the United States Constitution by indicating that he would abolish the entire document except for the Fifth Amendment. “I haven’t read the Constitution, but, from what I’ve been told, most of it is a waste of paper, quite frankly,” he told the One America News Network. “The Fifth Amendment is the only part worth saving.” Trump said that the Fifth Amendment was “maybe the most beautiful amendment ever written,” and noted that he had used it “many, many times.” “When I left office, I took a lot of documents with me, but I had no interest in taking the Constitution,” he said. “If I could have cut the Fifth Amendment out of the Constitution and put it in my pocket, I would have done that, but the rest of it was written by a bunch of dummies. A bunch of dummies.” Maybe its time for you Frank to go back to English comprehension class  ;D ;D ;D ;D Satire from the Borowitz Report Not the news. https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report I know its satire Frank, but it changes nothing of my point that you need to go back and do English comprehension again. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Frank seems to understand ok when the words support his case, I vaguely remember when that happened once.

scope wrote on Dec 6^th, 2022 at 1:33pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 10:13am: scope wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:48am: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:28am: Brian Ross wrote on Dec 4th, 2022 at 7:47pm: Donald Trump calls for end of US Constitution due to 'massive fraud' in 'false and fraudulent' 2020 presidential election ::) ::) A very dishonest, Bbwianesque smug/shifty headline by the ABC. He said it was time to "throw out" the 2020 presidential election results or to hold a "new election". "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. It is the massive fraud by the Dems that allows the Dems to ignore and terminate all rules.  He wasn't "calling for an end", he was accusing the Dems of terminating every rule, even those found in the constitution. You must be as smug, shifty and resolutely dishonest as Bbwian et al to twist that into Trump "calling for the end of the constitution". Nice try Frank, but you are full of poo. PALM BEACH (The Borowitz Report)—Donald J. Trump clarified his call for the termination of the United States Constitution by indicating that he would abolish the entire document except for the Fifth Amendment. “I haven’t read the Constitution, but, from what I’ve been told, most of it is a waste of paper, quite frankly,” he told the One America News Network. “The Fifth Amendment is the only part worth saving.” Trump said that the Fifth Amendment was “maybe the most beautiful amendment ever written,” and noted that he had used it “many, many times.” “When I left office, I took a lot of documents with me, but I had no interest in taking the Constitution,” he said. “If I could have cut the Fifth Amendment out of the Constitution and put it in my pocket, I would have done that, but the rest of it was written by a bunch of dummies. A bunch of dummies.” Maybe its time for you Frank to go back to English comprehension class  ;D ;D ;D ;D Satire from the Borowitz Report Not the news. https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report I know its satire Frank, but it changes nothing of my point that you need to go back and do English comprehension again. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Bollox, pal.

Don't give me a yeah-but-no-but satire. If you think my post contains a misunderstanding or a reading comprehension issue, identify it and say where the misunderstanding is.

Your Bbwianesque hinty-hinty,  'look over there' is not supporting the point you are struggling to make.

Frank wrote on Dec 6^th, 2022 at 5:21pm:

scope wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 1:33pm: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 10:13am: scope wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:48am: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:28am: Brian Ross wrote on Dec 4th, 2022 at 7:47pm: Donald Trump calls for end of US Constitution due to 'massive fraud' in 'false and fraudulent' 2020 presidential election ::) ::) A very dishonest, Bbwianesque smug/shifty headline by the ABC. He said it was time to "throw out" the 2020 presidential election results or to hold a "new election". "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. It is the massive fraud by the Dems that allows the Dems to ignore and terminate all rules.  He wasn't "calling for an end", he was accusing the Dems of terminating every rule, even those found in the constitution. You must be as smug, shifty and resolutely dishonest as Bbwian et al to twist that into Trump "calling for the end of the constitution". Nice try Frank, but you are full of poo. PALM BEACH (The Borowitz Report)—Donald J. Trump clarified his call for the termination of the United States Constitution by indicating that he would abolish the entire document except for the Fifth Amendment. “I haven’t read the Constitution, but, from what I’ve been told, most of it is a waste of paper, quite frankly,” he told the One America News Network. “The Fifth Amendment is the only part worth saving.” Trump said that the Fifth Amendment was “maybe the most beautiful amendment ever written,” and noted that he had used it “many, many times.” “When I left office, I took a lot of documents with me, but I had no interest in taking the Constitution,” he said. “If I could have cut the Fifth Amendment out of the Constitution and put it in my pocket, I would have done that, but the rest of it was written by a bunch of dummies. A bunch of dummies.” Maybe its time for you Frank to go back to English comprehension class  ;D ;D ;D ;D Satire from the Borowitz Report Not the news. https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report I know its satire Frank, but it changes nothing of my point that you need to go back and do English comprehension again. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Bollox, pal. Don't give me a yeah-but-no-but satire. If you think my post contains a misunderstanding or a reading comprehension issue, identify it and say where the misunderstanding is.

Then watch the old boy run and hide.

Intelligence and integrity, innit.

Dnarever wrote on Dec 6^th, 2022 at 3:05pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 12:08pm: Dnarever wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 12:04pm: Miranda Devine says that Twitter Files is a nothing burger. Don't watch Frank you may risk learning something. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BST9J0Z7ug Except she didn't say anything of the sort, duckwit. She said it is not a smoking gun. Not a smoking gun - it lacks substance - it does not say what the republicans want it to say - it is an empty burger - "It's a nothing burger" Virtually all the same thing, she is saying that the republicans want this to say that Biden and the democrats acted improperly and the fact is that it doesn't.

Duckwittery on stilts, duckwit. What does she say before she says it's not a smoking gun?  Go on, tell us what she says.

Also, tell as at which point is the word 'nothingburger' uttered by Miranda Devine.  Go on, duckwit, prove your worth. Show us that you are not just another Bbewianesque lying gweggy turd. (if indeed you aren't, that is).

Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 6^th, 2022 at 5:22pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 5:21pm: scope wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 1:33pm: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 10:13am: scope wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:48am: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:28am: Brian Ross wrote on Dec 4th, 2022 at 7:47pm: Donald Trump calls for end of US Constitution due to 'massive fraud' in 'false and fraudulent' 2020 presidential election ::) ::) A very dishonest, Bbwianesque smug/shifty headline by the ABC. He said it was time to "throw out" the 2020 presidential election results or to hold a "new election". "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. It is the massive fraud by the Dems that allows the Dems to ignore and terminate all rules.  He wasn't "calling for an end", he was accusing the Dems of terminating every rule, even those found in the constitution. You must be as smug, shifty and resolutely dishonest as Bbwian et al to twist that into Trump "calling for the end of the constitution". Nice try Frank, but you are full of poo. PALM BEACH (The Borowitz Report)—Donald J. Trump clarified his call for the termination of the United States Constitution by indicating that he would abolish the entire document except for the Fifth Amendment. “I haven’t read the Constitution, but, from what I’ve been told, most of it is a waste of paper, quite frankly,” he told the One America News Network. “The Fifth Amendment is the only part worth saving.” Trump said that the Fifth Amendment was “maybe the most beautiful amendment ever written,” and noted that he had used it “many, many times.” “When I left office, I took a lot of documents with me, but I had no interest in taking the Constitution,” he said. “If I could have cut the Fifth Amendment out of the Constitution and put it in my pocket, I would have done that, but the rest of it was written by a bunch of dummies. A bunch of dummies.” Maybe its time for you Frank to go back to English comprehension class  ;D ;D ;D ;D Satire from the Borowitz Report Not the news. https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report I know its satire Frank, but it changes nothing of my point that you need to go back and do English comprehension again. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Bollox, pal. Don't give me a yeah-but-no-but satire. If you think my post contains a misunderstanding or a reading comprehension issue, identify it and say where the misunderstanding is. Then watch the old boy run and hide. Intelligence and integrity, innit.

Go on, paki, back up your little ducky mate before you drag him into the Auburn toilet block and tell him all about... er... Nam.

Frank wrote on Dec 6^th, 2022 at 5:24pm:

Dnarever wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 3:05pm: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 12:08pm: Dnarever wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 12:04pm: Miranda Devine says that Twitter Files is a nothing burger. Don't watch Frank you may risk learning something. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BST9J0Z7ug Except she didn't say anything of the sort, duckwit. She said it is not a smoking gun. Not a smoking gun - it lacks substance - it does not say what the republicans want it to say - it is an empty burger - "It's a nothing burger" Virtually all the same thing, she is saying that the republicans want this to say that Biden and the democrats acted improperly and the fact is that it doesn't. Duckwittery on stilts, duckwit. What does she say before she says it's not a smoking gun?  Go on, tell us what she says. Also, tell as at which point is the word 'nothingburger' uttered by Miranda Devine.  Go on, duckwit, prove your worth. Show us that you are not just another Bbewianesque lying gweggy turd. (if indeed you aren't, that is).

Quite a bit (unspecified) that's useful - not the smoking gun we wanted - Feel that Elon held stuff back. (no not really you got the best he has) - nothing.

i.e -  we got nothin.

They took down the nude pics of Hunter as requested that were outside of their terms of service and the stuff that Trump wanted taken down.

Assuming that Trumps stuff was ok it seems pretty reasonable.

Frank wrote on Dec 6^th, 2022 at 5:21pm:

scope wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 1:33pm: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 10:13am: scope wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:48am: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:28am: Brian Ross wrote on Dec 4th, 2022 at 7:47pm: Donald Trump calls for end of US Constitution due to 'massive fraud' in 'false and fraudulent' 2020 presidential election ::) ::) A very dishonest, Bbwianesque smug/shifty headline by the ABC. He said it was time to "throw out" the 2020 presidential election results or to hold a "new election". "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. It is the massive fraud by the Dems that allows the Dems to ignore and terminate all rules.  He wasn't "calling for an end", he was accusing the Dems of terminating every rule, even those found in the constitution. You must be as smug, shifty and resolutely dishonest as Bbwian et al to twist that into Trump "calling for the end of the constitution". Nice try Frank, but you are full of poo. PALM BEACH (The Borowitz Report)—Donald J. Trump clarified his call for the termination of the United States Constitution by indicating that he would abolish the entire document except for the Fifth Amendment. “I haven’t read the Constitution, but, from what I’ve been told, most of it is a waste of paper, quite frankly,” he told the One America News Network. “The Fifth Amendment is the only part worth saving.” Trump said that the Fifth Amendment was “maybe the most beautiful amendment ever written,” and noted that he had used it “many, many times.” “When I left office, I took a lot of documents with me, but I had no interest in taking the Constitution,” he said. “If I could have cut the Fifth Amendment out of the Constitution and put it in my pocket, I would have done that, but the rest of it was written by a bunch of dummies. A bunch of dummies.” Maybe its time for you Frank to go back to English comprehension class  ;D ;D ;D ;D Satire from the Borowitz Report Not the news. https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report I know its satire Frank, but it changes nothing of my point that you need to go back and do English comprehension again. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Bollox, pal. Don't give me a yeah-but-no-but satire. If you think my post contains a misunderstanding or a reading comprehension issue, identify it and say where the misunderstanding is. Your Bbwianesque hinty-hinty,  'look over there' is not supporting the point you are struggling to make.

Comprehension is where you put a group of words together and work out what they mean.

For example when you combine these words that Trump used:


Quote:

allowed them the termination of all rules, including constitutional rules.

You see that Trump is talking about terminating the rules in the constitution. i.e by extension terminating the constitution as there is no constitution without its rules.

This is what that combination of words put in that sequence means. It's not confusing or ambiguous.

Frank wrote on Dec 6^th, 2022 at 5:21pm:

scope wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 1:33pm: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 10:13am: scope wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:48am: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:28am: Brian Ross wrote on Dec 4th, 2022 at 7:47pm: Donald Trump calls for end of US Constitution due to 'massive fraud' in 'false and fraudulent' 2020 presidential election ::) ::) A very dishonest, Bbwianesque smug/shifty headline by the ABC. He said it was time to "throw out" the 2020 presidential election results or to hold a "new election". "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. It is the massive fraud by the Dems that allows the Dems to ignore and terminate all rules.  He wasn't "calling for an end", he was accusing the Dems of terminating every rule, even those found in the constitution. You must be as smug, shifty and resolutely dishonest as Bbwian et al to twist that into Trump "calling for the end of the constitution". Nice try Frank, but you are full of poo. PALM BEACH (The Borowitz Report)—Donald J. Trump clarified his call for the termination of the United States Constitution by indicating that he would abolish the entire document except for the Fifth Amendment. “I haven’t read the Constitution, but, from what I’ve been told, most of it is a waste of paper, quite frankly,” he told the One America News Network. “The Fifth Amendment is the only part worth saving.” Trump said that the Fifth Amendment was “maybe the most beautiful amendment ever written,” and noted that he had used it “many, many times.” “When I left office, I took a lot of documents with me, but I had no interest in taking the Constitution,” he said. “If I could have cut the Fifth Amendment out of the Constitution and put it in my pocket, I would have done that, but the rest of it was written by a bunch of dummies. A bunch of dummies.” Maybe its time for you Frank to go back to English comprehension class  ;D ;D ;D ;D Satire from the Borowitz Report Not the news. https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report I know its satire Frank, but it changes nothing of my point that you need to go back and do English comprehension again. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Bollox, pal. Don't give me a yeah-but-no-but satire. If you think my post contains a misunderstanding or a reading comprehension issue, identify it and say where the misunderstanding is. Your Bbwianesque hinty-hinty,  'look over there' is not supporting the point you are struggling to make.

Poor frank, once again digging that hole deeper.
Trumps words
"A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social.

So terminate does not mean an ending?

termination
termination noun (ENDING)
the act of ending something or the end of something:

I never struggled to make my point, your English comprehension sucks.

Frank wrote on Dec 6^th, 2022 at 5:26pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 5:22pm: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 5:21pm: scope wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 1:33pm: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 10:13am: scope wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:48am: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:28am: Brian Ross wrote on Dec 4th, 2022 at 7:47pm: Donald Trump calls for end of US Constitution due to 'massive fraud' in 'false and fraudulent' 2020 presidential election ::) ::) A very dishonest, Bbwianesque smug/shifty headline by the ABC. He said it was time to "throw out" the 2020 presidential election results or to hold a "new election". "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. It is the massive fraud by the Dems that allows the Dems to ignore and terminate all rules.  He wasn't "calling for an end", he was accusing the Dems of terminating every rule, even those found in the constitution. You must be as smug, shifty and resolutely dishonest as Bbwian et al to twist that into Trump "calling for the end of the constitution". Nice try Frank, but you are full of poo. PALM BEACH (The Borowitz Report)—Donald J. Trump clarified his call for the termination of the United States Constitution by indicating that he would abolish the entire document except for the Fifth Amendment. “I haven’t read the Constitution, but, from what I’ve been told, most of it is a waste of paper, quite frankly,” he told the One America News Network. “The Fifth Amendment is the only part worth saving.” Trump said that the Fifth Amendment was “maybe the most beautiful amendment ever written,” and noted that he had used it “many, many times.” “When I left office, I took a lot of documents with me, but I had no interest in taking the Constitution,” he said. “If I could have cut the Fifth Amendment out of the Constitution and put it in my pocket, I would have done that, but the rest of it was written by a bunch of dummies. A bunch of dummies.” Maybe its time for you Frank to go back to English comprehension class  ;D ;D ;D ;D Satire from the Borowitz Report Not the news. https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report I know its satire Frank, but it changes nothing of my point that you need to go back and do English comprehension again. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Bollox, pal. Don't give me a yeah-but-no-but satire. If you think my post contains a misunderstanding or a reading comprehension issue, identify it and say where the misunderstanding is. Then watch the old boy run and hide. Intelligence and integrity, innit. Go on, paki, back up your little ducky mate before you drag him into the Auburn toilet block and tell him all about... er... Nam.

Will do, dear boy. Right after you show us your cunning stats you got from a meme.

University of Balogney, ja?

---

scope wrote on Dec 6^th, 2022 at 6:04pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 5:21pm: scope wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 1:33pm: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 10:13am: scope wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:48am: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:28am: Brian Ross wrote on Dec 4th, 2022 at 7:47pm: Donald Trump calls for end of US Constitution due to 'massive fraud' in 'false and fraudulent' 2020 presidential election ::) ::) A very dishonest, Bbwianesque smug/shifty headline by the ABC. He said it was time to "throw out" the 2020 presidential election results or to hold a "new election". "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. It is the massive fraud by the Dems that allows the Dems to ignore and terminate all rules.  He wasn't "calling for an end", he was accusing the Dems of terminating every rule, even those found in the constitution. You must be as smug, shifty and resolutely dishonest as Bbwian et al to twist that into Trump "calling for the end of the constitution". Nice try Frank, but you are full of poo. PALM BEACH (The Borowitz Report)—Donald J. Trump clarified his call for the termination of the United States Constitution by indicating that he would abolish the entire document except for the Fifth Amendment. “I haven’t read the Constitution, but, from what I’ve been told, most of it is a waste of paper, quite frankly,” he told the One America News Network. “The Fifth Amendment is the only part worth saving.” Trump said that the Fifth Amendment was “maybe the most beautiful amendment ever written,” and noted that he had used it “many, many times.” “When I left office, I took a lot of documents with me, but I had no interest in taking the Constitution,” he said. “If I could have cut the Fifth Amendment out of the Constitution and put it in my pocket, I would have done that, but the rest of it was written by a bunch of dummies. A bunch of dummies.” Maybe its time for you Frank to go back to English comprehension class  ;D ;D ;D ;D Satire from the Borowitz Report Not the news. https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report I know its satire Frank, but it changes nothing of my point that you need to go back and do English comprehension again. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Bollox, pal. Don't give me a yeah-but-no-but satire. If you think my post contains a misunderstanding or a reading comprehension issue, identify it and say where the misunderstanding is. Your Bbwianesque hinty-hinty,  'look over there' is not supporting the point you are struggling to make. Poor frank, once again digging that hole deeper. Trumps words "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. So terminate does not mean an ending? termination termination noun (ENDING) the act of ending something or the end of something: I never struggled to make my point, your English comprehension sucks.

What was the ACTION word (the verb) in that sentence? Can you locate it?
And what was the DOER (subject) of it, and its object, the thing at which the subject directed the action?


Here's help:

Xxxxx allows (verb,  the action)  yyyyyyy.

scope wrote on Dec 6^th, 2022 at 6:04pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 5:21pm: scope wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 1:33pm: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 10:13am: scope wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:48am: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:28am: Brian Ross wrote on Dec 4th, 2022 at 7:47pm: Donald Trump calls for end of US Constitution due to 'massive fraud' in 'false and fraudulent' 2020 presidential election ::) ::) A very dishonest, Bbwianesque smug/shifty headline by the ABC. He said it was time to "throw out" the 2020 presidential election results or to hold a "new election". "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. It is the massive fraud by the Dems that allows the Dems to ignore and terminate all rules.  He wasn't "calling for an end", he was accusing the Dems of terminating every rule, even those found in the constitution. You must be as smug, shifty and resolutely dishonest as Bbwian et al to twist that into Trump "calling for the end of the constitution". Nice try Frank, but you are full of poo. PALM BEACH (The Borowitz Report)—Donald J. Trump clarified his call for the termination of the United States Constitution by indicating that he would abolish the entire document except for the Fifth Amendment. “I haven’t read the Constitution, but, from what I’ve been told, most of it is a waste of paper, quite frankly,” he told the One America News Network. “The Fifth Amendment is the only part worth saving.” Trump said that the Fifth Amendment was “maybe the most beautiful amendment ever written,” and noted that he had used it “many, many times.” “When I left office, I took a lot of documents with me, but I had no interest in taking the Constitution,” he said. “If I could have cut the Fifth Amendment out of the Constitution and put it in my pocket, I would have done that, but the rest of it was written by a bunch of dummies. A bunch of dummies.” Maybe its time for you Frank to go back to English comprehension class  ;D ;D ;D ;D Satire from the Borowitz Report Not the news. https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report I know its satire Frank, but it changes nothing of my point that you need to go back and do English comprehension again. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Bollox, pal. Don't give me a yeah-but-no-but satire. If you think my post contains a misunderstanding or a reading comprehension issue, identify it and say where the misunderstanding is. Your Bbwianesque hinty-hinty,  'look over there' is not supporting the point you are struggling to make. Poor frank, once again digging that hole deeper. Trumps words "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. So terminate does not mean an ending? termination termination noun (ENDING) the act of ending something or the end of something: I never struggled to make my point, your English comprehension sucks.

Ee-gad, Tucker's going to be ropeable. You can hear the monologue now.

Better save your dinner, old boy. You're going to need it to throw at the TV when Tucker comes on and condemns your Dear Leader for threatening to terminate the founding document of the United States of America.

With any luck, Ye will take you along to Mar a Lago as his next plus-one.

Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 6^th, 2022 at 8:08pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 5:26pm: Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 5:22pm: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 5:21pm: scope wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 1:33pm: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 10:13am: scope wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:48am: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:28am: Brian Ross wrote on Dec 4th, 2022 at 7:47pm: Donald Trump calls for end of US Constitution due to 'massive fraud' in 'false and fraudulent' 2020 presidential election ::) ::) A very dishonest, Bbwianesque smug/shifty headline by the ABC. He said it was time to "throw out" the 2020 presidential election results or to hold a "new election". "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. It is the massive fraud by the Dems that allows the Dems to ignore and terminate all rules.  He wasn't "calling for an end", he was accusing the Dems of terminating every rule, even those found in the constitution. You must be as smug, shifty and resolutely dishonest as Bbwian et al to twist that into Trump "calling for the end of the constitution". Nice try Frank, but you are full of poo. PALM BEACH (The Borowitz Report)—Donald J. Trump clarified his call for the termination of the United States Constitution by indicating that he would abolish the entire document except for the Fifth Amendment. “I haven’t read the Constitution, but, from what I’ve been told, most of it is a waste of paper, quite frankly,” he told the One America News Network. “The Fifth Amendment is the only part worth saving.” Trump said that the Fifth Amendment was “maybe the most beautiful amendment ever written,” and noted that he had used it “many, many times.” “When I left office, I took a lot of documents with me, but I had no interest in taking the Constitution,” he said. “If I could have cut the Fifth Amendment out of the Constitution and put it in my pocket, I would have done that, but the rest of it was written by a bunch of dummies. A bunch of dummies.” Maybe its time for you Frank to go back to English comprehension class  ;D ;D ;D ;D Satire from the Borowitz Report Not the news. https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report I know its satire Frank, but it changes nothing of my point that you need to go back and do English comprehension again. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Bollox, pal. Don't give me a yeah-but-no-but satire. If you think my post contains a misunderstanding or a reading comprehension issue, identify it and say where the misunderstanding is. Then watch the old boy run and hide. Intelligence and integrity, innit. Go on, paki, back up your little ducky mate before you drag him into the Auburn toilet block and tell him all about... er... Nam. Will do, dear boy. Right after you show us your cunning stats you got from a meme. University of Balogney, ja?

You ARE stupider, simpler more Bbwianesque than I occasionally thought you might not have been..

But you are just a wee paki version of turd's Macedonian content farmer channelling the universal Bbwianesque moron.


Carry on, nothing will ever make you pause and awaken.

Frank wrote on Dec 6^th, 2022 at 8:17pm:

scope wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 6:04pm: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 5:21pm: scope wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 1:33pm: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 10:13am: scope wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:48am: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:28am: Brian Ross wrote on Dec 4th, 2022 at 7:47pm: Donald Trump calls for end of US Constitution due to 'massive fraud' in 'false and fraudulent' 2020 presidential election ::) ::) A very dishonest, Bbwianesque smug/shifty headline by the ABC. He said it was time to "throw out" the 2020 presidential election results or to hold a "new election". "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. It is the massive fraud by the Dems that allows the Dems to ignore and terminate all rules.  He wasn't "calling for an end", he was accusing the Dems of terminating every rule, even those found in the constitution. You must be as smug, shifty and resolutely dishonest as Bbwian et al to twist that into Trump "calling for the end of the constitution". Nice try Frank, but you are full of poo. PALM BEACH (The Borowitz Report)—Donald J. Trump clarified his call for the termination of the United States Constitution by indicating that he would abolish the entire document except for the Fifth Amendment. “I haven’t read the Constitution, but, from what I’ve been told, most of it is a waste of paper, quite frankly,” he told the One America News Network. “The Fifth Amendment is the only part worth saving.” Trump said that the Fifth Amendment was “maybe the most beautiful amendment ever written,” and noted that he had used it “many, many times.” “When I left office, I took a lot of documents with me, but I had no interest in taking the Constitution,” he said. “If I could have cut the Fifth Amendment out of the Constitution and put it in my pocket, I would have done that, but the rest of it was written by a bunch of dummies. A bunch of dummies.” Maybe its time for you Frank to go back to English comprehension class  ;D ;D ;D ;D Satire from the Borowitz Report Not the news. https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report I know its satire Frank, but it changes nothing of my point that you need to go back and do English comprehension again. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Bollox, pal. Don't give me a yeah-but-no-but satire. If you think my post contains a misunderstanding or a reading comprehension issue, identify it and say where the misunderstanding is. Your Bbwianesque hinty-hinty,  'look over there' is not supporting the point you are struggling to make. Poor frank, once again digging that hole deeper. Trumps words "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. So terminate does not mean an ending? termination termination noun (ENDING) the act of ending something or the end of something: I never struggled to make my point, your English comprehension sucks. What was the ACTION word (the verb) in that sentence? Can you locate it? And what was the DOER (subject) of it, and its object, the thing at which the subject directed the action? Here's help: Xxxxx allows (verb,  the action)  yyyyyyy.

It's okay, dear boy. Dear Leader's taken it back.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/saradorn/2022/12/05/trump-backtracks-on-calling-for-termination-of-constitution-following-backlash/?sh=16e636c54161

When he said the constitution needs to be terminated, he only means under extenuating circumstances.

You know, like losing another erection.

Have you eaten yet?

The little Ranga Saxon to destroy the 'old demented' corrupt Democrats while his tall blonde Anglo mate will turn up later to usher in the New golden age of American Politics.

Sure beats a century of Car Salesman Entertainers and Spin Doctors and their fake politics for the Media. ;)

Frank wrote on Dec 6^th, 2022 at 8:23pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 8:08pm: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 5:26pm: Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 5:22pm: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 5:21pm: scope wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 1:33pm: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 10:13am: scope wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:48am: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:28am: Brian Ross wrote on Dec 4th, 2022 at 7:47pm: Donald Trump calls for end of US Constitution due to 'massive fraud' in 'false and fraudulent' 2020 presidential election ::) ::) A very dishonest, Bbwianesque smug/shifty headline by the ABC. He said it was time to "throw out" the 2020 presidential election results or to hold a "new election". "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. It is the massive fraud by the Dems that allows the Dems to ignore and terminate all rules.  He wasn't "calling for an end", he was accusing the Dems of terminating every rule, even those found in the constitution. You must be as smug, shifty and resolutely dishonest as Bbwian et al to twist that into Trump "calling for the end of the constitution". Nice try Frank, but you are full of poo. PALM BEACH (The Borowitz Report)—Donald J. Trump clarified his call for the termination of the United States Constitution by indicating that he would abolish the entire document except for the Fifth Amendment. “I haven’t read the Constitution, but, from what I’ve been told, most of it is a waste of paper, quite frankly,” he told the One America News Network. “The Fifth Amendment is the only part worth saving.” Trump said that the Fifth Amendment was “maybe the most beautiful amendment ever written,” and noted that he had used it “many, many times.” “When I left office, I took a lot of documents with me, but I had no interest in taking the Constitution,” he said. “If I could have cut the Fifth Amendment out of the Constitution and put it in my pocket, I would have done that, but the rest of it was written by a bunch of dummies. A bunch of dummies.” Maybe its time for you Frank to go back to English comprehension class  ;D ;D ;D ;D Satire from the Borowitz Report Not the news. https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report I know its satire Frank, but it changes nothing of my point that you need to go back and do English comprehension again. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Bollox, pal. Don't give me a yeah-but-no-but satire. If you think my post contains a misunderstanding or a reading comprehension issue, identify it and say where the misunderstanding is. Then watch the old boy run and hide. Intelligence and integrity, innit. Go on, paki, back up your little ducky mate before you drag him into the Auburn toilet block and tell him all about... er... Nam. Will do, dear boy. Right after you show us your cunning stats you got from a meme. University of Balogney, ja? You ARE stupider, simpler more Bbwianesque than I occasionally thought you might not have been.. But you are just a wee paki version of turd's Macedonian content farmer channelling the universal Bbwianesque moron. Carry on, nothing will ever make you pause and awaken.

Not at all. If you can show how the Nig Nogs are the number-one threat to Whitey as you claim, I'm all ears.

Until then, feel free to defend presidential candidates who make tantilising election promises such as terminating the constitution.

Freeeeedom, innit.

Asians attacking USA externally.
Africans attacking USA internally.
Media plays along.

Jasin wrote on Dec 6^th, 2022 at 8:33pm:

Asians attacking USA externally. Africans attacking USA internally. Media plays along.

And Dear Leader attacks from within.


Quote:

As polls show Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-Fla.) competitive with Trump and many other Republicans eye a run against him, some in the GOP think Trump might even end up pulling the plug on his nascent campaign. “I just think, in the end, he will not end up running because [of] the polling,” said retiring Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio). “The trend line is not positive.” Trump on Saturday falsely cited “massive fraud” in his 2020 loss before calling for a “termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution” in order to reinstate him as president or hold a new election. That comment, Portman said, “makes no sense.” “I’m at a loss for words. We need to move on,” Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), an adviser to McConnell, said of the constitutional-suspension posts from the former president. Cornyn added that the prospect of Trump winning the nomination is “increasingly less likely, given statements like that.” Some said the party’s lackluster midterm results speak for themselves. “The facts of the election in 2022 are just indisputable. The ultra, pro-Trump, handpicked by Trump, based on loyalty to Trump? Those candidates wildly underperformed,” said retiring Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.), who voted to convict the former president in his second impeachment trial. “It’s pretty clear that he’s become a toxic force and that’s going to diminish his influence a lot.” His suspend-the-Constitution posts on his Truth Social platform mark the second time in two weeks that Trump has prompted criticism from within the GOP, after he dined last month with antisemitic rapper Ye, better known as Kanye West, and white nationalist Nick Fuentes. That sitdown led Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) to predict that anyone holding meetings with people who use their profiles to disseminate bigotry “are highly unlikely to ever be elected president of the United States.”

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/12/05/senate-republicans-trump-suspending-constitution-00072265

I agree. You heard it here first, leftards. Dear Leader might have a few mom-and-pop donations squished away to spend on legal fees, but he's not going to spend it on a run.

Dear Leader's toast, for all the reasons above. More than likely, he'll be appealing a jail sentence by 2024.

We will make America great again, no?

Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 6^th, 2022 at 8:31pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 8:23pm: Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 8:08pm: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 5:26pm: Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 5:22pm: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 5:21pm: scope wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 1:33pm: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 10:13am: scope wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:48am: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:28am: Brian Ross wrote on Dec 4th, 2022 at 7:47pm: Donald Trump calls for end of US Constitution due to 'massive fraud' in 'false and fraudulent' 2020 presidential election ::) ::) A very dishonest, Bbwianesque smug/shifty headline by the ABC. He said it was time to "throw out" the 2020 presidential election results or to hold a "new election". "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. It is the massive fraud by the Dems that allows the Dems to ignore and terminate all rules.  He wasn't "calling for an end", he was accusing the Dems of terminating every rule, even those found in the constitution. You must be as smug, shifty and resolutely dishonest as Bbwian et al to twist that into Trump "calling for the end of the constitution". Nice try Frank, but you are full of poo. PALM BEACH (The Borowitz Report)—Donald J. Trump clarified his call for the termination of the United States Constitution by indicating that he would abolish the entire document except for the Fifth Amendment. “I haven’t read the Constitution, but, from what I’ve been told, most of it is a waste of paper, quite frankly,” he told the One America News Network. “The Fifth Amendment is the only part worth saving.” Trump said that the Fifth Amendment was “maybe the most beautiful amendment ever written,” and noted that he had used it “many, many times.” “When I left office, I took a lot of documents with me, but I had no interest in taking the Constitution,” he said. “If I could have cut the Fifth Amendment out of the Constitution and put it in my pocket, I would have done that, but the rest of it was written by a bunch of dummies. A bunch of dummies.” Maybe its time for you Frank to go back to English comprehension class  ;D ;D ;D ;D Satire from the Borowitz Report Not the news. https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report I know its satire Frank, but it changes nothing of my point that you need to go back and do English comprehension again. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Bollox, pal. Don't give me a yeah-but-no-but satire. If you think my post contains a misunderstanding or a reading comprehension issue, identify it and say where the misunderstanding is. Then watch the old boy run and hide. Intelligence and integrity, innit. Go on, paki, back up your little ducky mate before you drag him into the Auburn toilet block and tell him all about... er... Nam. Will do, dear boy. Right after you show us your cunning stats you got from a meme. University of Balogney, ja? You ARE stupider, simpler more Bbwianesque than I occasionally thought you might not have been.. But you are just a wee paki version of turd's Macedonian content farmer channelling the universal Bbwianesque moron. Carry on, nothing will ever make you pause and awaken. Not at all. If you can show how the Nig Nogs are the number-one threat to Whitey as you claim, I'm all ears. Until then, feel free to defend presidential candidates who make tantilising election promises such as terminating the constitution. Freeeeedom, innit.

You are full of shite, paki, and EVEN you know it. You, tujd, Bbwian (although I am overestimating him), you all know you are full of it.
Duckwit is but he doesnt realise it. He's the unaware innocent retard of the Gang of Fuqqwitz. The rest of you delight and rejoice in being  consciously and purposefully moronic. It's your Dada act. Pus in boots, you all are.

Frank wrote on Dec 6^th, 2022 at 9:23pm:

You are full of shite, paki, and EVEN you know it. You, tujd, Bbwian (although I am overestimating him), you all know you are full of it. Duckwit is but he doesnt realise it. He's the unaware innocent retard of the Gang of Fuqqwitz. The rest of you delight and rejoice in being  consciously and purposefully moronic. It's your Dada act. Pus in boots, you all are.

The real Dada act is the Lear jet sitting fully fuelled waiting on the tarmac at Mar el Largo for Trumps escape to Moscow.

Ayn Marx wrote on Dec 6^th, 2022 at 9:38pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:23pm: You are full of shite, paki, and EVEN you know it. You, tujd, Bbwian (although I am overestimating him), you all know you are full of it. Duckwit is but he doesnt realise it. He's the unaware innocent retard of the Gang of Fuqqwitz. The rest of you delight and rejoice in being  consciously and purposefully moronic. It's your Dada act. Pus in boots, you all are. The real Dada act is the Lear jet sitting fully fuelled waiting on the tarmac at Mar el Largo for Trumps escape to Moscow.

That's not Dada, whispy pony tailed old satyr, that's just tired MSM twattery.

Well, it's officially on the record.

Trump's actual words;  "the termination of all rules... even those found in the Constitution".

End of story.   QED.

Which is why I opined earlier that the failed former president is now
showing obvious symptoms of early onset dementia—often termed
"mild cognitive impairment"—which may include problems with memory,
language or judgment.    Trump shows signs of all three.

Frank wrote on Dec 6^th, 2022 at 9:23pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 8:31pm: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 8:23pm: Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 8:08pm: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 5:26pm: Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 5:22pm: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 5:21pm: scope wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 1:33pm: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 10:13am: scope wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:48am: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:28am: Brian Ross wrote on Dec 4th, 2022 at 7:47pm: Donald Trump calls for end of US Constitution due to 'massive fraud' in 'false and fraudulent' 2020 presidential election ::) ::) A very dishonest, Bbwianesque smug/shifty headline by the ABC. He said it was time to "throw out" the 2020 presidential election results or to hold a "new election". "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. It is the massive fraud by the Dems that allows the Dems to ignore and terminate all rules.  He wasn't "calling for an end", he was accusing the Dems of terminating every rule, even those found in the constitution. You must be as smug, shifty and resolutely dishonest as Bbwian et al to twist that into Trump "calling for the end of the constitution". Nice try Frank, but you are full of poo. PALM BEACH (The Borowitz Report)—Donald J. Trump clarified his call for the termination of the United States Constitution by indicating that he would abolish the entire document except for the Fifth Amendment. “I haven’t read the Constitution, but, from what I’ve been told, most of it is a waste of paper, quite frankly,” he told the One America News Network. “The Fifth Amendment is the only part worth saving.” Trump said that the Fifth Amendment was “maybe the most beautiful amendment ever written,” and noted that he had used it “many, many times.” “When I left office, I took a lot of documents with me, but I had no interest in taking the Constitution,” he said. “If I could have cut the Fifth Amendment out of the Constitution and put it in my pocket, I would have done that, but the rest of it was written by a bunch of dummies. A bunch of dummies.” Maybe its time for you Frank to go back to English comprehension class  ;D ;D ;D ;D Satire from the Borowitz Report Not the news. https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report I know its satire Frank, but it changes nothing of my point that you need to go back and do English comprehension again. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Bollox, pal. Don't give me a yeah-but-no-but satire. If you think my post contains a misunderstanding or a reading comprehension issue, identify it and say where the misunderstanding is. Then watch the old boy run and hide. Intelligence and integrity, innit. Go on, paki, back up your little ducky mate before you drag him into the Auburn toilet block and tell him all about... er... Nam. Will do, dear boy. Right after you show us your cunning stats you got from a meme. University of Balogney, ja? You ARE stupider, simpler more Bbwianesque than I occasionally thought you might not have been.. But you are just a wee paki version of turd's Macedonian content farmer channelling the universal Bbwianesque moron. Carry on, nothing will ever make you pause and awaken. Not at all. If you can show how the Nig Nogs are the number-one threat to Whitey as you claim, I'm all ears. Until then, feel free to defend presidential candidates who make tantilising election promises such as terminating the constitution. Freeeeedom, innit. You are full of shite, paki, and EVEN you know it. You, tujd, Bbwian (although I am overestimating him), you all know you are full of it. Duckwit is but he doesnt realise it. He's the unaware innocent retard of the Gang of Fuqqwitz. The rest of you delight and rejoice in being  consciously and purposefully moronic. It's your Dada act. Pus in boots, you all are.

Oh, I see. Denying it, are you?

That could work. Much easier than proving those stats, no?

Good show, dear boy. Now you ask me for a link to your silly old posts and we can all get some rest.

You.

Ayn Marx wrote on Dec 6^th, 2022 at 9:38pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2022 at 9:23pm: You are full of shite, paki, and EVEN you know it. You, tujd, Bbwian (although I am overestimating him), you all know you are full of it. Duckwit is but he doesnt realise it. He's the unaware innocent retard of the Gang of Fuqqwitz. The rest of you delight and rejoice in being  consciously and purposefully moronic. It's your Dada act. Pus in boots, you all are. The real Dada act is the Lear jet sitting fully fuelled waiting on the tarmac at Mar el Largo for Trumps escape to Moscow.

True. Dear Leader has actively floated the idea. His own words:

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/10/28/is-president-donald-trump-a-flight-risk-433313

We'll have to wait and see what happens, ja?

AusGeoff wrote on Dec 7^th, 2022 at 12:21am:

Well, it's officially on the record. Trump's actual words;  "the termination of all rules... even those found in the Constitution". End of story.   QED. Which is why I opined earlier that the failed former president is now showing obvious symptoms of early onset dementia—often termed "mild cognitive impairment"—which may include problems with memory, language or judgment.    Trump shows signs of all three.

That might be true, Geoff - if Dear Leader wrote his own posts.

Alas, he tells others what to write. That post would have been put up by his social media director, under orders.

The post would have carried the organisation's stamp on the letterhead. You know, that Nazi-looking eagle with the stars and stripes in the place of the swastika, ja?

---

Don't Let The Fake News Fool You

Former President Donald Trump did not attack the Constitution of the United States of America — despite what the establishment media is saying.

In the wake of the release of the “Twitter Files” that show that Big Tech conspired with leftists to sway to 2020 election and discredit the Hunter laptop story, critics accused Donald Trump of saying that the U.S. Constitution should be “terminated.”

While Trump’s post was ham-handed and poorly written, in fact he did not come straight out and suggest that the law of the land be thrown in the circular file and forgotten as his critics have charged.

On Friday, Elon Musk released files that prove that the FBI, the Democratic Party and members of the Biden campaign met with members of Facebook, Twitter and other big tech companies to squash the Hunter Biden laptop story because it might hurt Joe Biden’s 2020 campaign for president. And immediately after the release of the first batch of insider files, former President Trump jumped to his Truth Social account to blast the media for this outrage.

On Saturday, he wrote, “So, with the revelation of MASSIVE & WIDESPREAD FRAUD & DECEPTION in working closely with Big Tech Companies, the DNC, & the Democrat Party, do you throw the Presidential Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution. Our great ‘Founders’ did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!”

The ex-president followed that up on Monday, saying that if an election is “irrefutably fraudulent, it should go to the rightful winner” or at least be redone.

“Where open and blatant fraud is involved, there should be no time limit for change,” he concluded.

The fact is, Joe Biden did not win with anything near a landslide. Indeed, in key states he barely eked past Trump’s totals and achieved very narrow wins. Further, some polls suggest that many may have resisted voting for Biden if they had been made fully aware of the Hunter laptop story.

An August poll reported by the New York Post, for instance, found that nearly four in five voters felt that a “truthful” coverage of the laptop story would have changed the outcome of the election.

There has also been much fraud found over the years. So, we know without a doubt it exists, eroding faith in our elections.

Regardless, the left-wing media establishment — and many NeverTrumpers — quickly began wailing that a former U.S. president was advocating for an end to the U.S. Constitution.

To name a few, CNN, called Trump’s post “dangerous” and a “fantasy,” GOP traitor Liz Cheney called Trump the “enemy of the constitution,” and the Associated Press reported that Trump was “rebuked” over his comments.

Trump soon jumped back to his Truth account to blast those claiming he wants to “terminate” the whole Constitution over the 2020 election.

On Monday, he let both barrels loose and wrote, “The Fake News is actually trying to convince the American People that I said I wanted to ‘terminate’ the Constitution. This is simply more DISINFORMATION & LIES, just like RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIA, and all of their other HOAXES & SCAMS. What I said was that when there is “MASSIVE & WIDESPREAD FRAUD & DECEPTION,” as has been irrefutably proven in the 2020 Presidential Election, steps must be immediately taken to RIGHT THE WRONG. Only FOOLS would disagree with that and accept STOLEN ELECTIONS. MAGA!”

Indeed, a close look at his original post should inform the reader that Trump was talking about election law, not the entire U.S. Constitution. Context matters, here.

Trump opened his Truth Social post saying specifically, “So, with the revelation of MASSIVE & WIDESPREAD FRAUD & DECEPTION” in the 2020 election “do you throw the Presidential Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION?”

Note that he is talking about the election. He did not add into the equation the entire U.S. government. He was focused only on the election.

Then he wrote, “A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution.”

Again, you have to look at “even those found in the Constitution.” That is your cue that he was talking about particular rules, not the whole Constitution.

We must realize that there is no specific process laid out in the Constitution that describes how we handle a fraudulent election. And if massive fraud is found, Trump is saying that such a finding “allows” for the rules guiding elections to be set aside and a redress of the fraud to be made.

In fact, the Constitution was violated in the first place by the election fraudsters. But, in the end, Trump was talking about correcting a fraudulent election and citing election law in that pursuit. He did not say “throw out the whole constitution,” like so many leftists are claiming...

Whether you believe the 2020 election was fraudulent or not, “terminating” a fraudulent election was his point, not erasing the entirety of our American system of government.

https://www.westernjournal.com/trump-didnt-say-terminate-constitution-revelation-twitter-files-dont-let-media-fool/

AusGeoff wrote on Dec 7^th, 2022 at 12:21am:

Well, it's officially on the record. Trump's actual words;  "the termination of all rules... even those found in the Constitution". End of story.   QED. Which is why I opined earlier that the failed former president is now showing obvious symptoms of early onset dementia—often termed "mild cognitive impairment"—which may include problems with memory, language or judgment.    Trump shows signs of all three.

In your shifty smug rush to end the story you forgot to say what action by whom or what would allow the termination of rules.  Let us remind you:

He said it was time to "throw out" the 2020 presidential election results or to hold a "new election".

"A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social.


Can the shifty smug Sage of Gippsland identify verbs and subjects in sentences? No, evidently he can't.

Here's the answer (so you don't need to call a friend and still be puzzled for days):  The subject, the doer is 'fraud' and the verb is 'allows'.
So the REAL meaning of what he said is: massive fraud allows for the termination of all rules. Massive electoral fraud by the Dems.

Now you can debate the massive fraud claim but only shifty smug idiots would try to make out that Trump was calling for the abolishing of the Constitution.

It's official: Failed Forty Five runs a criminal organisation.

Trump Organization found guilty of tax fraud after New York trial

Donald Trump's company has been convicted of tax fraud in a case brought by the Manhattan District Attorney, a significant repudiation of financial practices at the former US president's business.

The guilty verdict came on the second day of deliberations following a trial in which the Trump Organization was accused of being complicit in a scheme by top executives to avoid paying personal income taxes on job perks such as rent-free apartments and luxury cars.

Peccary's a liar, fraud, hypocrite, sex deviant and a B*itch.  ;D ;D

Frank wrote on Dec 7^th, 2022 at 7:37am:

AusGeoff wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 12:21am: Well, it's officially on the record. Trump's actual words;  "the termination of all rules... even those found in the Constitution". End of story.   QED. Which is why I opined earlier that the failed former president is now showing obvious symptoms of early onset dementia—often termed "mild cognitive impairment"—which may include problems with memory, language or judgment.    Trump shows signs of all three. In your shifty smug rush to end the story you forgot to say what action by whom or what would allow the termination of rules.  Let us remind you: He said it was time to "throw out" the 2020 presidential election results or to hold a "new election". "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. Can the shifty smug Sage of Gippsland identify verbs and subjects in sentences? No, evidently he can't. Here's the answer (so you don't need to call a friend and still be puzzled for days):  The subject, the doer is 'fraud' and the verb is 'allows'. So the REAL meaning of what he said is: massive fraud allows for the termination of all rules. Massive electoral fraud by the Dems. Now you can debate the massive fraud claim but only shifty smug idiots would try to make out that Trump was calling for the abolishing of the Constitution.

I see. So Dear Leader said it, but that's okay. He's only promising to terminate the constitution to get back the Dems.

Nice use of grammatology there, dear boy. Do you know what you are, old chap?

You're a post-structuralist. Meaning is dead. In the end, Dear Leader didn't really say anything at all, no?

Just so.

Frank wrote on Dec 7^th, 2022 at 7:37am:

Now you can debate the massive fraud claim ...

No.  There's no debate, because there was no fraud.

This has been proven in courts all over the country.

There's nothing to debate.



Frank wrote on Dec 7^th, 2022 at 7:37am:

... but only shifty smug idiots would try to make out that Trump was calling for the abolishing of the Constitution.

That's exactly what he was doing.

"A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social.

TRUMP

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 7^th, 2022 at 1:14pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 7:37am: Now you can debate the massive fraud claim ... No.  There's no debate, because there was no fraud. This has been proven in courts all over the country. There's nothing to debate. Frank wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 7:37am: ... but only shifty smug idiots would try to make out that Trump was calling for the abolishing of the Constitution. That's exactly what he was doing. "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social.

Quote:

"A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social.

Frank posted this comment himself likely 30 hours ago and in the same post showed no understanding of the meaning of these words when placed in that order. In fact he claimed that they mean the exact opposite of what the dictionary would conclude.

Dnarever wrote on Dec 7^th, 2022 at 2:54pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 1:14pm: Frank wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 7:37am: Now you can debate the massive fraud claim ... No.  There's no debate, because there was no fraud. This has been proven in courts all over the country. There's nothing to debate. Frank wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 7:37am: ... but only shifty smug idiots would try to make out that Trump was calling for the abolishing of the Constitution. That's exactly what he was doing. "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. Quote: "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. Frank posted this comment himself likely 30 hours ago and in the same post showed no understanding of the meaning of these words when placed in that order. In fact he claimed that they mean the exact opposite of what the dictionary would conclude.

It's extraordinary.

Black is white in Frank's world.

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 7^th, 2022 at 1:14pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 7:37am: Now you can debate the massive fraud claim ... No.  There's no debate, because there was no fraud. This has been proven in courts all over the country. There's nothing to debate. Frank wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 7:37am: ... but only shifty smug idiots would try to make out that Trump was calling for the abolishing of the Constitution. That's exactly what he was doing. "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social.

Yes, but meaning is slippery, Greggery. Read your Derrida. Who can truly say what they mean? Can you? Can I? Can anybody?

I think not. Look, there are countless variables. When Dear Leader said the constitution did he mean the American constitution? We need to take that into account. When he said all rules and articles, was he referring to laws, or perhaps ethical codes of a higher nature - perhaps even articles that have not yet been written down?

We need to factor in all the variables here, Greggery. Who would do the terminating? And as the old boy correctly pointed out, where are the verbs? Of whom is the subject? Subject - verb - object, dear, it's just good grammar.

I'm sorry, Greggery, we may never really know what Mr Trump meant to say, but I think we can safely say this:


Quote:

When Mexico sends it's people, they're not sending their best. They're not sending you, they're not sending you. They're sending people that have a lot of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people."

Does that help to clarify things a bit?

Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 7^th, 2022 at 1:11pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 7:37am: AusGeoff wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 12:21am: Well, it's officially on the record. Trump's actual words;  "the termination of all rules... even those found in the Constitution". End of story.   QED. Which is why I opined earlier that the failed former president is now showing obvious symptoms of early onset dementia—often termed "mild cognitive impairment"—which may include problems with memory, language or judgment.    Trump shows signs of all three. In your shifty smug rush to end the story you forgot to say what action by whom or what would allow the termination of rules.  Let us remind you: He said it was time to "throw out" the 2020 presidential election results or to hold a "new election". "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. Can the shifty smug Sage of Gippsland identify verbs and subjects in sentences? No, evidently he can't. Here's the answer (so you don't need to call a friend and still be puzzled for days):  The subject, the doer is 'fraud' and the verb is 'allows'. So the REAL meaning of what he said is: massive fraud allows for the termination of all rules. Massive electoral fraud by the Dems. Now you can debate the massive fraud claim but only shifty smug idiots would try to make out that Trump was calling for the abolishing of the Constitution. I see. So Dear Leader said it, but that's okay. He's only promising to terminate the constitution to get back the Dems. Nice use of grammatology there, dear boy. Do you know what you are, old chap? You're a post-structuralist. Meaning is dead. In the end, Dear Leader didn't really say anything at all, no? Just so.

Why do you insist on lying, Mustaphaken?

There is nothing 'post-structuralist about understand the various parts of speech and how they make meaning.

Massive fraud (subject) allows (verb, transitive) the termination of rules (object).

The cat is on the mat. The dog ate your homework. You - cannot stop - your lies. Gweggy turd - is lying - about everything. Duckwit - quacks -  silly duckwittery.


See? No 'Trump - promised - to abolish the constitution' anywhere.

Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 7^th, 2022 at 2:57pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 1:14pm: Frank wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 7:37am: Now you can debate the massive fraud claim ... No.  There's no debate, because there was no fraud. This has been proven in courts all over the country. There's nothing to debate. Frank wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 7:37am: ... but only shifty smug idiots would try to make out that Trump was calling for the abolishing of the Constitution. That's exactly what he was doing. "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. Yes, but meaning is slippery, Greggery. Read your Derrida. Who can truly say what they mean? Can you? Can I? Can anybody? I think not. Look, there are countless variables. When Dear Leader said the constitution did he mean the American constitution? We need to take that into account. When he said all rules and articles, was he referring to laws, or perhaps ethical codes of a higher nature - perhaps even articles that have not yet been written down? We need to factor in all the variables here, Greggery. Who would do the terminating? And as the old boy correctly pointed out, where are the verbs? Of whom is the subject? Subject - verb - object, dear, it's just good grammar. I'm sorry, Greggery, we may never really know what Mr Trump meant to say, but I think we can safely say this: Quote: When Mexico sends it's people, they're not sending their best. They're not sending you, they're not sending you. They're sending people that have a lot of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people." Does that help to clarify things a bit?

Yes likely why they were knocked out in the group stage of the world cup. The are first to qualify for 2026 though.

Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 7^th, 2022 at 2:57pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 1:14pm: Frank wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 7:37am: Now you can debate the massive fraud claim ... No.  There's no debate, because there was no fraud. This has been proven in courts all over the country. There's nothing to debate. Frank wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 7:37am: ... but only shifty smug idiots would try to make out that Trump was calling for the abolishing of the Constitution. That's exactly what he was doing. "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. Yes, but meaning is slippery, Greggery. Read your Derrida. Who can truly say what they mean? Can you? Can I? Can anybody? I think not. Look, there are countless variables. When Dear Leader said the constitution did he mean the American constitution? We need to take that into account. When he said all rules and articles, was he referring to laws, or perhaps ethical codes of a higher nature - perhaps even articles that have not yet been written down? We need to factor in all the variables here, Greggery. Who would do the terminating? And as the old boy correctly pointed out, where are the verbs? Of whom is the subject? Subject - verb - object, dear, it's just good grammar. I'm sorry, Greggery, we may never really know what Mr Trump meant to say, but I think we can safely say this: Quote: When Mexico sends it's people, they're not sending their best. They're not sending you, they're not sending you. They're sending people that have a lot of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people." Does that help to clarify things a bit?

Seems pretty clear, doesn't it?    :-/

"A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social.

Maybe Frank has dyslexia.

step right up folks.

It's the corrupt Media-Mafia-Democrats
v
the corrupt outsider Trump because he has red hair.

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 7^th, 2022 at 3:14pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 2:57pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 1:14pm: Frank wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 7:37am: Now you can debate the massive fraud claim ... No.  There's no debate, because there was no fraud. This has been proven in courts all over the country. There's nothing to debate. Frank wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 7:37am: ... but only shifty smug idiots would try to make out that Trump was calling for the abolishing of the Constitution. That's exactly what he was doing. "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. Yes, but meaning is slippery, Greggery. Read your Derrida. Who can truly say what they mean? Can you? Can I? Can anybody? I think not. Look, there are countless variables. When Dear Leader said the constitution did he mean the American constitution? We need to take that into account. When he said all rules and articles, was he referring to laws, or perhaps ethical codes of a higher nature - perhaps even articles that have not yet been written down? We need to factor in all the variables here, Greggery. Who would do the terminating? And as the old boy correctly pointed out, where are the verbs? Of whom is the subject? Subject - verb - object, dear, it's just good grammar. I'm sorry, Greggery, we may never really know what Mr Trump meant to say, but I think we can safely say this: Quote: When Mexico sends it's people, they're not sending their best. They're not sending you, they're not sending you. They're sending people that have a lot of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people." Does that help to clarify things a bit? Seems pretty clear, doesn't it?    :-/ "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. Maybe Frank has dyslexia.

Wonder how it will go down when they eventually figure out that it means that the 2nd amendment and freedom of speech are gone?

Dnarever wrote on Dec 7^th, 2022 at 3:18pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 3:14pm: Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 2:57pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 1:14pm: Frank wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 7:37am: Now you can debate the massive fraud claim ... No.  There's no debate, because there was no fraud. This has been proven in courts all over the country. There's nothing to debate. Frank wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 7:37am: ... but only shifty smug idiots would try to make out that Trump was calling for the abolishing of the Constitution. That's exactly what he was doing. "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. Yes, but meaning is slippery, Greggery. Read your Derrida. Who can truly say what they mean? Can you? Can I? Can anybody? I think not. Look, there are countless variables. When Dear Leader said the constitution did he mean the American constitution? We need to take that into account. When he said all rules and articles, was he referring to laws, or perhaps ethical codes of a higher nature - perhaps even articles that have not yet been written down? We need to factor in all the variables here, Greggery. Who would do the terminating? And as the old boy correctly pointed out, where are the verbs? Of whom is the subject? Subject - verb - object, dear, it's just good grammar. I'm sorry, Greggery, we may never really know what Mr Trump meant to say, but I think we can safely say this: Quote: When Mexico sends it's people, they're not sending their best. They're not sending you, they're not sending you. They're sending people that have a lot of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people." Does that help to clarify things a bit? Seems pretty clear, doesn't it?    :-/ "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. Maybe Frank has dyslexia. Wonder how it will go down when they eventually figure out that it means that the 2nd amendment and freedom of speech are gone?

Indeed   :)

He said "all".

"A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social.

Dnarever wrote on Dec 7^th, 2022 at 3:18pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 3:14pm: Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 2:57pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 1:14pm: Frank wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 7:37am: Now you can debate the massive fraud claim ... No.  There's no debate, because there was no fraud. This has been proven in courts all over the country. There's nothing to debate. Frank wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 7:37am: ... but only shifty smug idiots would try to make out that Trump was calling for the abolishing of the Constitution. That's exactly what he was doing. "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. Yes, but meaning is slippery, Greggery. Read your Derrida. Who can truly say what they mean? Can you? Can I? Can anybody? I think not. Look, there are countless variables. When Dear Leader said the constitution did he mean the American constitution? We need to take that into account. When he said all rules and articles, was he referring to laws, or perhaps ethical codes of a higher nature - perhaps even articles that have not yet been written down? We need to factor in all the variables here, Greggery. Who would do the terminating? And as the old boy correctly pointed out, where are the verbs? Of whom is the subject? Subject - verb - object, dear, it's just good grammar. I'm sorry, Greggery, we may never really know what Mr Trump meant to say, but I think we can safely say this: Quote: When Mexico sends it's people, they're not sending their best. They're not sending you, they're not sending you. They're sending people that have a lot of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people." Does that help to clarify things a bit? Seems pretty clear, doesn't it?    :-/ "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. Maybe Frank has dyslexia. Wonder how it will go down when they eventually figure out that it means that the 2nd amendment and freedom of speech are gone?

Gone. That's only fair, no?

If the leftards want to go flicking switches and shifting votes around, it's game on. Anything goes.

Mr Trump can step in and declare the winner. That's only fair, right? With all the leftards' dirty tricks, we wouldn't expect anything else.

Venezuelan voting machines, Soros-funded hacks, fake vote dumps, all of it. Mr Trump doesn't need to prove it in court, Rudy has a theory. Sidney has a necklace pen. And Mr Trump has the Proud Boys, standing back and standing by and ready to lynch Mike Pence should it come to that, but do you know?

I don't think Mr Trump was confused when he said he plans to terminate the constitution. I dont think he was having a senior's moment. I dont think he was mixing up his verbs and his adverbs in an attempt to express his love of the constitution, as the old boy surmises. I think it's probably the most honest thing he's ever said.

You?

Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 7^th, 2022 at 4:09pm:

I don't think Mr Trump was confused when he said he plans to terminate the constitution.

Where did he say that, Mustaphaken? 

The leftards wanted to abolish the electoral college and make other changes after they lost in 2016.

The recent court case shows they don't care for the 1st amendment.

We know the democRats don't want the 2A

The leftards are a bunch of hypocrites when to comes to the constitution

Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 7^th, 2022 at 4:09pm:

Dnarever wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 3:18pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 3:14pm: Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 2:57pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 1:14pm: Frank wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 7:37am: Now you can debate the massive fraud claim ... No.  There's no debate, because there was no fraud. This has been proven in courts all over the country. There's nothing to debate. Frank wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 7:37am: ... but only shifty smug idiots would try to make out that Trump was calling for the abolishing of the Constitution. That's exactly what he was doing. "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. Yes, but meaning is slippery, Greggery. Read your Derrida. Who can truly say what they mean? Can you? Can I? Can anybody? I think not. Look, there are countless variables. When Dear Leader said the constitution did he mean the American constitution? We need to take that into account. When he said all rules and articles, was he referring to laws, or perhaps ethical codes of a higher nature - perhaps even articles that have not yet been written down? We need to factor in all the variables here, Greggery. Who would do the terminating? And as the old boy correctly pointed out, where are the verbs? Of whom is the subject? Subject - verb - object, dear, it's just good grammar. I'm sorry, Greggery, we may never really know what Mr Trump meant to say, but I think we can safely say this: Quote: When Mexico sends it's people, they're not sending their best. They're not sending you, they're not sending you. They're sending people that have a lot of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people." Does that help to clarify things a bit? Seems pretty clear, doesn't it?    :-/ "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. Maybe Frank has dyslexia. Wonder how it will go down when they eventually figure out that it means that the 2nd amendment and freedom of speech are gone? Gone. That's only fair, no? If the leftards want to go flicking switches and shifting votes around, it's game on. Anything goes. Mr Trump can step in and declare the winner. That's only fair, right? With all the leftards' dirty tricks, we wouldn't expect anything else. Venezuelan voting machines, Soros-funded hacks, fake vote dumps, all of it. Mr Trump doesn't need to prove it in court, Rudy has a theory. Sidney has a necklace pen. And Mr Trump has the Proud Boys, standing back and standing by and ready to lynch Mike Pence should it come to that, but do you know? I don't think Mr Trump was confused when he said he plans to terminate the constitution. I dont think he was having a senior's moment. I dont think he was mixing up his verbs and his adverbs in an attempt to express his love of the constitution, as the old boy surmises. I think it's probably the most honest thing he's ever said. You?

Absolutely.

He'd like nothing better than to get rid of the constitution.

I mean, he openly admitted it:

"A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," the failed ex-president wrote in a post on Truth Social.

Frank wrote on Dec 7^th, 2022 at 4:47pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 4:09pm: I don't think Mr Trump was confused when he said he plans to terminate the constitution. Where did he say that, Mustaphaken?

Where did he say he's allowed?

Hard to say, old boy. Executive privilege, innit.

Executive privilege, executive orders, executive time, the list goes on and on, ja?

---

Trump

Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 7^th, 2022 at 6:16pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 4:47pm: Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 4:09pm: I don't think Mr Trump was confused when he said he plans to terminate the constitution. Where did he say that, Mustaphaken?  Where did he say he's allowed? Hard to say, old boy. Executive privilege, innit. Executive privilege, executive orders, executive time, the list goes on and on, ja?

“Different people say different things but as I understand it, if you’re the president of the United States, you can terminate the constitution just by saying it’s terminated, even by thinking about it.

“There doesn’t have to be a process. There can be a process, but there doesn’t have to be.

“You’re the president – you make that decision.”

Baronvonrort wrote on Dec 7^th, 2022 at 5:33pm:

The leftards wanted to abolish the electoral college and make other changes after they lost in 2016. The recent court case shows they don't care for the 1st amendment. We know the democRats don't want the 2A The leftards are a bunch of hypocrites when to comes to the constitution

I know, right? Some leftard suggested a bit of electoral reform to make things nice for the voters.

Dear Leader suggests they do away with the system altogether.

Thanks for the compare and contrast, Baron. It's good to have some perspective, no?

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 7^th, 2022 at 6:20pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 6:16pm: Frank wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 4:47pm: Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 4:09pm: I don't think Mr Trump was confused when he said he plans to terminate the constitution. Where did he say that, Mustaphaken?  Where did he say he's allowed? Hard to say, old boy. Executive privilege, innit. Executive privilege, executive orders, executive time, the list goes on and on, ja? “Different people say different things but as I understand it, if you’re the president of the United States, you can terminate the constitution just by saying it’s terminated, even by thinking about it. “There doesn’t have to be a process. There can be a process, but there doesn’t have to be. “You’re the president – you make that decision.”

Thanks for providing the clarification, Greggery.

Are there any further questions?

If I'd known soren was making such a fool of himself I would have come back to this thread sooner.  ;D ;D


Seriously Frank,  get that refund before it's to late, your primary school clearly failed to uphold their end of the deal

Baronvonrort wrote on Dec 7^th, 2022 at 5:33pm:

The leftards wanted to abolish the electoral college and make other changes after they lost in 2016. The recent court case shows they don't care for the 1st amendment. We know the democRats don't want the 2A The leftards are a bunch of hypocrites when to comes to the constitution

That's why this thread is already 7 pages long, and why it will probably get longer

“Different people say different things but as I understand it, if you’re the president of the United States, you can terminate the constitution just by saying it’s terminated, even by thinking about it.

“There doesn’t have to be a process. There can be a process, but there doesn’t have to be.

“You’re the president – you make that decision.”

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 7^th, 2022 at 6:47pm:

“Different people say different things but as I understand it, if you’re the president of the United States, you can terminate the constitution just by saying it’s terminated, even by thinking about it. “There doesn’t have to be a process. There can be a process, but there doesn’t have to be. “You’re the president – you make that decision.”

Except if you're Trump. Then its a different story eh.
Can't have a President that doesn't abide by the Media narrative.

Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 7^th, 2022 at 6:16pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 4:47pm: Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 4:09pm: I don't think Mr Trump was confused when he said he plans to terminate the constitution. Where did he say that, Mustaphaken?  Where did he say he's allowed? Hard to say, old boy. Executive privilege, innit. Executive privilege, executive orders, executive time, the list goes on and on, ja?

Evidence of your bad faith shiteheadery, paki, turd, et al.  Shifty, smug, lying, dishonest. How you justify your evident fuqqwittery to yourselves is a PhD thesis or five.

Or you could just buy a Doctorate in Dishonesty like Bbwian.


To recall you to the point, rabid little paki:


You: I don't think Mr Trump was confused when he said he plans to terminate the constitution.

Me: Where did he say that, Mustaphaken? 



Dont avoid the point, shitehead.

Frank wrote on Dec 7^th, 2022 at 6:53pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 6:16pm: Frank wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 4:47pm: Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 4:09pm: I don't think Mr Trump was confused when he said he plans to terminate the constitution. Where did he say that, Mustaphaken?  Where did he say he's allowed? Hard to say, old boy. Executive privilege, innit. Executive privilege, executive orders, executive time, the list goes on and on, ja? Evidence of your bad faith shiteheadery, paki, turd, et al.  Shifty, smug, lying, dishonest. How you justify your evident fuqqwittery to yourselves is a PhD thesis or five. Or you could just buy a Doctorate in Dishonesty like Bbwian. To recall you to the point, rabid little paki: You: I don't think Mr Trump was confused when he said he plans to terminate the constitution. Me: Where did he say that, Mustaphaken?  Dont avoid the point, shitehead.

Sorry, dear boy, what was the question again?

Bias_2012 wrote on Dec 7^th, 2022 at 6:41pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 5:33pm: The leftards wanted to abolish the electoral college and make other changes after they lost in 2016. The recent court case shows they don't care for the 1st amendment. We know the democRats don't want the 2A The leftards are a bunch of hypocrites when to comes to the constitution That's why this thread is already 7 pages long, and why it will probably get longer

I know, right? The leftards are so pedantic when it comes to the rules, no?

Why aren't they jumping up and down every time Sleepy Joe Biden suggests terminating the constitution if he loses an erection?

Ui
Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 7^th, 2022 at 6:57pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 6:53pm: Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 6:16pm: Frank wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 4:47pm: Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 4:09pm: I don't think Mr Trump was confused when he said he plans to terminate the constitution. Where did he say that, Mustaphaken?  Where did he say he's allowed? Hard to say, old boy. Executive privilege, innit. Executive privilege, executive orders, executive time, the list goes on and on, ja? Evidence of your bad faith shiteheadery, paki, turd, et al.  Shifty, smug, lying, dishonest. How you justify your evident fuqqwittery to yourselves is a PhD thesis or five. Or you could just buy a Doctorate in Dishonesty like Bbwian. To recall you to the point, rabid little paki: You: I don't think Mr Trump was confused when he said he plans to terminate the constitution. Me: Where did he say that, Mustaphaken?  Dont avoid the point, shitehead. Sorry, dear boy, what was the question again?

Fuqq, you are thicker than Gino Four Planks. You use the question mark, yet you are blind to it when I used it in the post you responded to.


Your dishonesty is limitless, paki arse bandit.  You are as evil as gweggy turd and shifty smug Bbwian. You'd all rather die than be honest or honourable. You are all rotten inside - and you know it.

Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 7^th, 2022 at 6:59pm:

Bias_2012 wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 6:41pm: Baronvonrort wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 5:33pm: The leftards wanted to abolish the electoral college and make other changes after they lost in 2016. The recent court case shows they don't care for the 1st amendment. We know the democRats don't want the 2A The leftards are a bunch of hypocrites when to comes to the constitution That's why this thread is already 7 pages long, and why it will probably get longer I know, right? The leftards are so pedantic when it comes to the rules, no?

Many leftards in this forum like Little Pecca were calling to abolish the electoral college after Trump won in 2016.

Is the electoral college covered inArticle II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution?

If Leftards didn't have double standards they wouldn't have any standards.
;D ;D ;D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D

It's not outrageous when Leftards want to go against the constitution they get butthurt when anyone else suggests it. ::)

"A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Mr Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social.

“Different people say different things but as I understand it, if you’re the president of the United States, you can terminate the constitution just by saying it’s terminated, even by thinking about it.

“There doesn’t have to be a process. There can be a process, but there doesn’t have to be.

“You’re the president – you make that decision.”