Check it out ;)

'You Just Lied': Elon Musk Slaughters BBC Reporter In Live Interview

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqJKAnN0-gM

"Space Karen" (that's Musk's nickname btw - or at least one of them) must be one of your heroes, Sir Nail.

Twitter is no longer enforcing its Covid misinformation policy

November 29, 2022


Quote:

Twitter said it will no longer enforce its longstanding Covid misinformation policy, yet another sign of how Elon Musk plans to transform the social media company he bought a month ago.

Perhaps the reporter should have also asked Space Karen why it's taking him so long to step down as Twitter CEO?

Elon Musk says he will step down as Twitter CEO — once he finds a replacement

December 21, 2022


Quote:

Twitter owner Elon Musk confirmed Tuesday evening he will step down as the company’s CEO, but only when he identifies a successor, directly addressing for the first time a Twitter poll he created this week in which millions of users voted for his ouster.

Quote:

The announcement comes after more than a day of silence about the poll following its outcome. On Monday, after more than 17 million users had voted — 57.5% of whom said Musk should resign — the billionaire executive addressed the results only indirectly. He suggested that future Twitter polls could be restricted to paid users of Twitter Blue, the company’s subscription service. Musk’s poll asking users whether he should resign as CEO came after a massive backlash to Twitter’s abrupt suspension of several journalists who cover him, as well as Twitter’s decision to ban, and then un-ban, links to other social media platforms including Facebook, Instagram and Mastodon, a fast-growing Twitter rival that has octupled in size since October.

The guy is seriously messed up in the head, something else he has in common with Sir Nail.

LOL... Musk did not "slaughter" James Clayton.

Rather, the inept Clayton hadn't prepared himself for the interview.

As per his usual interview tactics, Musk simply deflects answering
questions by just asking one of his own as a response.  It's really
difficult interviewing someone like Musk—who's learned to be adept
at this tactic in order to cover his own lack of broader knowledge.

The format is a tried and true one.

Interviewer:  "Would you say hate speech has become endemic?"

Interviewee:  "What do you define as 'hate' speech?"

             ::)

AusGeoff wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 11:17am:

LOL... Musk did not "slaughter" James Clayton. Rather, the inept Clayton hadn't prepared himself for the interview. As per his usual interview tactics, Musk simply deflects answering questions by just asking one of his own as a response.  It's really difficult interviewing someone like Musk—who's learned to be adept at this tactic in order to cover his own lack of broader knowledge. The format is a tried and true one. Interviewer:  "Would you say hate speech has become endemic?" Interviewee:  "What do you define as 'hate' speech?"              ::)

Because we're now in an era where saying it's wrong for men in dresses to expose their penises to children in change rooms is considered hate speech, it's absolutely necessary to ask for a persons definition of what hate speech actually is if that is the topic at hand.

we have certainly entered the realm of the surreal, when people like carl can proclaim their intellectual superiority to elon musk  ;D ;D ;D

AusGeoff wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 11:17am:

LOL... Musk did not "slaughter" James Clayton. Rather, the inept Clayton hadn't prepared himself for the interview. As per his usual interview tactics, Musk simply deflects answering questions by just asking one of his own as a response.  It's really difficult interviewing someone like Musk—who's learned to be adept at this tactic in order to cover his own lack of broader knowledge. The format is a tried and true one. Interviewer:  "Would you say hate speech has become endemic?" Interviewee:  "What do you define as 'hate' speech?"              ::)

He slaughtered him. Just accept it geoff ;)

Carl D wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 10:53am:

"Space Karen" (that's Musk's nickname btw - or at least one of them) must be one of your heroes, Sir Nail. Twitter is no longer enforcing its Covid misinformation policy November 29, 2022 Quote: Twitter said it will no longer enforce its longstanding Covid misinformation policy, yet another sign of how Elon Musk plans to transform the social media company he bought a month ago. Perhaps the reporter should have also asked Space Karen why it's taking him so long to step down as Twitter CEO? Elon Musk says he will step down as Twitter CEO — once he finds a replacement December 21, 2022 [quote]Twitter owner Elon Musk confirmed Tuesday evening he will step down as the company’s CEO, but only when he identifies a successor, directly addressing for the first time a Twitter poll he created this week in which millions of users voted for his ouster.

Quote:

The announcement comes after more than a day of silence about the poll following its outcome. On Monday, after more than 17 million users had voted — 57.5% of whom said Musk should resign — the billionaire executive addressed the results only indirectly. He suggested that future Twitter polls could be restricted to paid users of Twitter Blue, the company’s subscription service. Musk’s poll asking users whether he should resign as CEO came after a massive backlash to Twitter’s abrupt suspension of several journalists who cover him, as well as Twitter’s decision to ban, and then un-ban, links to other social media platforms including Facebook, Instagram and Mastodon, a fast-growing Twitter rival that has octupled in size since October.

The guy is seriously messed up in the head, something else he has in common with Sir Nail.[/quote]

Imagine if Space Karen teamed up with Criminal Defendant Trump   ;D

Q. "How do you start a small business in the US?"

A: "Start a big one and then hand it over to Musk or Trump".

Musk made a point that will haunt the British media and Parliamentarians for years to come.

British parliamentarians from both sides of Parliament and the BBC have colluded to report misinformation by omission.

They all refuse to report and/or comment on vaccine side effects.

The BBC journalist in that video is an example of the limp-wristed swill who are currently hired as journalists - Piss poor interviewing skills, being directed to parrot what they think is a populist line. The pansy thought he had Musk cornered - he got bitten.

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 1:03pm:

Musk made a point that will haunt the British media and Parliamentarians for years to come. British parliamentarians from both sides of Parliament and the BBC have colluded to report misinformation by omission. They all refuse to report and/or comment on vaccine side effects.

I did a quick search, and there are many reports on the side effects.  Here are just a few examples:

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-60468900

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-60653946

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-55932832

https://www.bbc.com/news/av/health-56437270

Refuse to report and comment?  No.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 1:11pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 1:03pm: Musk made a point that will haunt the British media and Parliamentarians for years to come. British parliamentarians from both sides of Parliament and the BBC have colluded to report misinformation by omission. They all refuse to report and/or comment on vaccine side effects. I did a quick search, and there are many reports on the side effects.  Here are just a few examples: https://www.bbc.com/news/health-60468900 https://www.bbc.com/news/health-60653946 https://www.bbc.com/news/health-55932832 https://www.bbc.com/news/av/health-56437270 Refuse to report and comment?  No.

All nuanced towards vaccine safety and deflecting from serious side effects.

Parliamentarians from both sides exit the chamber when serious side effects are raised by a parliamentarian.

The fear that compensation claims will become a tsunami after any admission of serious side effects (particularly from AstraZeneca) has kept 3 British prime ministers from dealing with the issue.

But lawsuits are coming.

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 1:36pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 1:11pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 1:03pm: Musk made a point that will haunt the British media and Parliamentarians for years to come. British parliamentarians from both sides of Parliament and the BBC have colluded to report misinformation by omission. They all refuse to report and/or comment on vaccine side effects. I did a quick search, and there are many reports on the side effects.  Here are just a few examples: https://www.bbc.com/news/health-60468900 https://www.bbc.com/news/health-60653946 https://www.bbc.com/news/health-55932832 https://www.bbc.com/news/av/health-56437270 Refuse to report and comment?  No. All nuanced towards vaccine safety and deflecting from serious side effects.

They're reporting on medical studies that say there are very few serious side-effects.  i.e. they're reporting the truth.

But you don't want the truth.

"A major study of vaccine side-effects in the US found no link between two Covid jabs and the number of deaths recorded after vaccination.

"The Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said 92% of reported side-effects after the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines were mild."   BBC

First, it's: "They refuse to report or comment on side-effects".

Then, when that's shown to be an outright 100% lie the tune changes to: "The reports and comments aren't saying what I want to hear".

It's hilarious watching you guys trying to justify your anti-science stance.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 1:58pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 1:36pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 1:11pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 1:03pm: Musk made a point that will haunt the British media and Parliamentarians for years to come. British parliamentarians from both sides of Parliament and the BBC have colluded to report misinformation by omission. They all refuse to report and/or comment on vaccine side effects. I did a quick search, and there are many reports on the side effects.  Here are just a few examples: https://www.bbc.com/news/health-60468900 https://www.bbc.com/news/health-60653946 https://www.bbc.com/news/health-55932832 https://www.bbc.com/news/av/health-56437270 Refuse to report and comment?  No. All nuanced towards vaccine safety and deflecting from serious side effects. They're reporting on medical studies that say there are no serious effects. You want them to report on something that doesn't exist. "A major study of vaccine side-effects in the US found no link between two Covid jabs and the number of deaths recorded after vaccination. "The Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said 92% of reported side-effects after the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines were mild."   BBC First, it's: "They are reporting on side-effects". Then, when that's shown to be an outright 100% lie the tune changes to: "The reports aren't saying what I want to hear". It's hilarious watching you guys trying to justify your anti-science stance.

The irony is that a BBC reporter Lisa Shaw (44) died a week after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine in May 2021. Her autopsy report from the coroner identifies the vaccine as the cause.

It seems old men and gay men have found a common cause in their complete faith in these particular vaccines and boosters.

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 2:06pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 1:58pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 1:36pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 1:11pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 1:03pm: Musk made a point that will haunt the British media and Parliamentarians for years to come. British parliamentarians from both sides of Parliament and the BBC have colluded to report misinformation by omission. They all refuse to report and/or comment on vaccine side effects. I did a quick search, and there are many reports on the side effects.  Here are just a few examples: https://www.bbc.com/news/health-60468900 https://www.bbc.com/news/health-60653946 https://www.bbc.com/news/health-55932832 https://www.bbc.com/news/av/health-56437270 Refuse to report and comment?  No. All nuanced towards vaccine safety and deflecting from serious side effects. They're reporting on medical studies that say there are no serious effects. You want them to report on something that doesn't exist. "A major study of vaccine side-effects in the US found no link between two Covid jabs and the number of deaths recorded after vaccination. "The Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said 92% of reported side-effects after the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines were mild."   BBC First, it's: "They are reporting on side-effects". Then, when that's shown to be an outright 100% lie the tune changes to: "The reports aren't saying what I want to hear". It's hilarious watching you guys trying to justify your anti-science stance. The irony is that a BBC reporter Lisa Shaw (44) died a week after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine in May 2021. Her autopsy report from the coroner identifies the vaccine as the cause.

Oh, so now they DO report and comment on serious side-effects.

You need to make up your mind.

"They don't report or comment on serious side-effects".

Nek minnit!

"The BBC reported on a serious side-effect".


Lol, hilarious.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 2:12pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:06pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 1:58pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 1:36pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 1:11pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 1:03pm: Musk made a point that will haunt the British media and Parliamentarians for years to come. British parliamentarians from both sides of Parliament and the BBC have colluded to report misinformation by omission. They all refuse to report and/or comment on vaccine side effects. I did a quick search, and there are many reports on the side effects.  Here are just a few examples: https://www.bbc.com/news/health-60468900 https://www.bbc.com/news/health-60653946 https://www.bbc.com/news/health-55932832 https://www.bbc.com/news/av/health-56437270 Refuse to report and comment?  No. All nuanced towards vaccine safety and deflecting from serious side effects. They're reporting on medical studies that say there are no serious effects. You want them to report on something that doesn't exist. "A major study of vaccine side-effects in the US found no link between two Covid jabs and the number of deaths recorded after vaccination. "The Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said 92% of reported side-effects after the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines were mild."   BBC First, it's: "They are reporting on side-effects". Then, when that's shown to be an outright 100% lie the tune changes to: "The reports aren't saying what I want to hear". It's hilarious watching you guys trying to justify your anti-science stance. The irony is that a BBC reporter Lisa Shaw (44) died a week after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine in May 2021. Her autopsy report from the coroner identifies the vaccine as the cause. Oh, so now they DO report and comment on serious side-effects. You need to make up your mind. "They don't report or comment on serious side-effects". Nek minnit! "The BBC reported on a serious side-effect". Lol, hilarious.

The BBC reports where it must but no investigative journalism has occurred by the BBC or other mainstream media.

Fatalities, where claimants assert vaccine side effects are the cause, are nearing 1500.

When the media reports on the reasons for the mass walkouts of parliamentarians from the chamber when vaccine side effects are raised in parliament, will be a day for honest journalism. If the vaccine is safe, why the walkouts from both sides of parliament?

75 claimants, have sent AstraZeneca pre-action protocol letters in November under the Consumer Protection Act.

The lawsuits are coming.

Lol    ;D


https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-became-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg

aquascoot wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 12:08pm:

we have certainly entered the realm of the surreal, when people like carl can proclaim their intellectual superiority to elon musk  ;D ;D ;D

I've noticed Sir Nail seems to have finally stopped replying to my posts over the last couple of days.

Looks like I need to do a bit more work with you (but I do appear to be slowly getting there).

:)

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 2:24pm:

Lol    ;D https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-became-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg

I'd bet that doesn't disgust you.

The interesting things is how almost simultaneously the left hive mind started hating on Musk. It was like in the beginning they didn't even know why but they all received the same memo.

Who is directing this? Seems anyone who is a disrupter gets targeted.

Musk is a complicated person,  not without flaws but the treatment he's getting from the left says more about the left than Musk himself.

hit the nail on the head gordo.

brexit and then trump scared the crap out of those with real power.
the cia, fbi, dod, mainstream media, big tech, big pharma, big food.

they like a nice passive domesticated population because they are easier to farm (sell products to, but basicly enslave)

so how could they get things back to normal, so the intelligence community, big tech, big finance guys wouldnt be threatened

well, they looked back to 9/11  and saw how easy it is to take away liberties and spy on the citizens if you can just scare them

global warming an covid were convenient messages to beat down the population.

we KNOW from the twitter files and from the pentagon papers and from wikileaks and from snowden that the intelligence community are in close alignment with big tech and all protected under big government umbrella

we know that  the guys at the head of tech, the intelligence community got together with LISTS OF 1000's of accounts to be closed on twitter. these were direct requests, including that of a sitting president. these were overwhelmingly the accounts of right , who they see as troublemakers

because they dont like trouble...its bad for control.

deals are struck to promote a narrative agreed to by the groups who hold the power
tech, intelligence community, pharma, food, military, dod,

these guys run the world , not biden or albo.

they promoted biden for one reason. he is awfully easy to dominate.
trump was a loose cannon...he had to go.

so is musk, so is rogan, so was assange.

if you stick your head up and dont agree with the narrative, they will come after you.

whats sad is that the left, who used to hate big military, big cia, big pharma, big media, now absolutley love it.

they think it will "keep them safe" and the left have always valued safety.

its why the actual marine corps , army, air force and navy are overwhelmingly republican.
its why police and sherriffs are overwhlemingly republican.

republicans are brave
lefties are not

they love an authority figure.
they love the guys who enslave them, they love a lockdown, they love trump being charged
they would make perfect little goody two shoes minions to Xi or stalin or adolf
truly awful people

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 2:37pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:24pm: Lol    ;D https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-became-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg I'd bet that doesn't disgust you.

The fact that you twist yourself inside out in a pathetic attempt to justify your anti-science stance doesn't disgust me - it just amuses me.

"They don't report on side-effects".

Actually, they do - and that has now been proven.

"They don't report on the serious side-effects"

Nek minnit!

"They reported on a serious side-effect".

You can't make this stuff up   ;D

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 3:25pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:37pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:24pm: Lol    ;D https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-became-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg I'd bet that doesn't disgust you. The fact that you twist yourself inside out in a pathetic attempt to justify your anti-science stance doesn't disgust me - it just amuses me. "They don't report on side-effects". Actually, they do - and that has now been proven. "They don't report on the serious side-effects" Nek minnit! "They reported on a serious side-effect". You can't make this stuff up   ;D

;D

Sure confuses the heck out of me.

Mind you, I have an excuse... I've just finished trudging through aquascoot's latest word salad and it's taking a while for me to recover from that.  ::)

https://i.ibb.co/xCj3rFw/Musk.jpg

;D ;D ;D

Some drivers say they're ditching Tesla over Elon Musk's politics: 'I don't want Tesla cars to become the new MAGA hat'

https://www.businessinsider.com/drivers-ditch-tesla-elon-musk-politics-2022-7

Carl D wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 3:33pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 3:25pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:37pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:24pm: Lol    ;D https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-became-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg I'd bet that doesn't disgust you. The fact that you twist yourself inside out in a pathetic attempt to justify your anti-science stance doesn't disgust me - it just amuses me. "They don't report on side-effects". Actually, they do - and that has now been proven. "They don't report on the serious side-effects" Nek minnit! "They reported on a serious side-effect". You can't make this stuff up   ;D ;D Sure confuses the heck out of me. Mind you, I have an excuse... I've just finished trudging through aquascoot's latest word salad and it's taking a while for me to recover from that.  ::)

no need to read it carl

i dont want you reading it

i dont like casting pearls before swine
Matthew 7:6
Give not that which is holy to dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 3:25pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:37pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:24pm: Lol    ;D https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-became-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg I'd bet that doesn't disgust you. The fact that you twist yourself inside out in a pathetic attempt to justify your anti-science stance doesn't disgust me - it just amuses me. "They don't report on side-effects". Actually, they do - and that has now been proven. "They don't report on the serious side-effects" Nek minnit! "They reported on a serious side-effect". You can't make this stuff up   ;D

What is science?

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 5:02pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 3:25pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:37pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:24pm: Lol    ;D https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-became-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg I'd bet that doesn't disgust you. The fact that you twist yourself inside out in a pathetic attempt to justify your anti-science stance doesn't disgust me - it just amuses me. "They don't report on side-effects". Actually, they do - and that has now been proven. "They don't report on the serious side-effects" Nek minnit! "They reported on a serious side-effect". You can't make this stuff up   ;D What is science?

science is what you practice meister. it means having a curious mind

gweg practices dogma and ideology
he thinks comments like fauci's "i AM science" are scientific  ;D ;D

aquascoot wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 5:02pm:

Carl D wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 3:33pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 3:25pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:37pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:24pm: Lol    ;D https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-became-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg I'd bet that doesn't disgust you. The fact that you twist yourself inside out in a pathetic attempt to justify your anti-science stance doesn't disgust me - it just amuses me. "They don't report on side-effects". Actually, they do - and that has now been proven. "They don't report on the serious side-effects" Nek minnit! "They reported on a serious side-effect". You can't make this stuff up   ;D ;D Sure confuses the heck out of me. Mind you, I have an excuse... I've just finished trudging through aquascoot's latest word salad and it's taking a while for me to recover from that.  ::) no need to read it carl i dont want you reading it i dont like casting pearls before swine Matthew 7:6 Give not that which is holy to dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.

Carl's attitude will change when the meaning of his existence, his old aunt, dies of one of 2 diseases most likely to kill her at her age: influenza or covid - despite her being pumped to the eyeballs with boosters for both.

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 5:02pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 3:25pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:37pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:24pm: Lol    ;D https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-became-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg I'd bet that doesn't disgust you. The fact that you twist yourself inside out in a pathetic attempt to justify your anti-science stance doesn't disgust me - it just amuses me. "They don't report on side-effects". Actually, they do - and that has now been proven. "They don't report on the serious side-effects" Nek minnit! "They reported on a serious side-effect". You can't make this stuff up   ;D What is science?

At least you're honest about that.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 5:11pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 5:02pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 3:25pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:37pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:24pm: Lol    ;D https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-became-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg I'd bet that doesn't disgust you. The fact that you twist yourself inside out in a pathetic attempt to justify your anti-science stance doesn't disgust me - it just amuses me. "They don't report on side-effects". Actually, they do - and that has now been proven. "They don't report on the serious side-effects" Nek minnit! "They reported on a serious side-effect". You can't make this stuff up   ;D What is science? At least you're honest about that.

Thalidomide was science once.

Carl D wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 3:33pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 3:25pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:37pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:24pm: Lol    ;D https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-became-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg I'd bet that doesn't disgust you. The fact that you twist yourself inside out in a pathetic attempt to justify your anti-science stance doesn't disgust me - it just amuses me. "They don't report on side-effects". Actually, they do - and that has now been proven. "They don't report on the serious side-effects" Nek minnit! "They reported on a serious side-effect". You can't make this stuff up   ;D ;D Sure confuses the heck out of me. Mind you, I have an excuse... I've just finished trudging through aquascoot's latest word salad and it's taking a while for me to recover from that.  ::)

There’s nothing confusing to me about it… but then again I think differently… perhaps.
Both statements are correct. Given the correct timeline.
I see these statements as something summed up at the time and then at advancing times.
Hence changes….
For instance ….

"They don't report on the serious side-effects"

That’s exactly what was happening… in fact way back when test results were being conducted … that 75 year data withholding bs…. Yes… withholding real results ….
Like why? Something to hide maybe  :-?

And then….

"They reported on a serious side-effect".

Yes… it’s eventually coming to surface… and there’s more in time to come….
It’s just the tip of the iceberg.

The serious side effects were being withheld… swept under the carpet…
That’s why there were none reported earlier.

PS: Some of the links trying to convince people of c-vax safety… from 2022 and 2021….
We are almost mid 2023 now.
News (and science) change tact.i

Sophia wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 5:20pm:

Carl D wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 3:33pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 3:25pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:37pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:24pm: Lol    ;D https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-became-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg I'd bet that doesn't disgust you. The fact that you twist yourself inside out in a pathetic attempt to justify your anti-science stance doesn't disgust me - it just amuses me. "They don't report on side-effects". Actually, they do - and that has now been proven. "They don't report on the serious side-effects" Nek minnit! "They reported on a serious side-effect". You can't make this stuff up   ;D ;D Sure confuses the heck out of me. Mind you, I have an excuse... I've just finished trudging through aquascoot's latest word salad and it's taking a while for me to recover from that.  ::) There’s nothing confusing to me about it… but then again I think differently… perhaps. Both statements are correct. Given the correct timeline. I see these statements as something summed up at the time and then at advancing times. Hence changes…. For instance …. "They don't report on the serious side-effects" That’s exactly what was happening… in fact way back when test results were being conducted … that 75 year data withholding bs…. Yes… withholding real results …. Like why? Something to hide maybe  :-? And then…. "They reported on a serious side-effect". Yes… it’s eventually coming to surface… and there’s more in time to come…. It’s just the tip of the iceberg. The serious side effects were being withheld… swept under the carpet… That’s why there were none reported earlier. PS: Some of the links trying to convince people of c-vax safety… from 2022 and 2021…. We are almost mid 2023 now. News (and science) change tact.

And as if it couldn't be made more obvious that there is a political motive behind the under-reporting, both sides of the UK Parliament walked out twice when the subject of vaccine side effects was raised in the UK Parliament.

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 5:24pm:

Sophia wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 5:20pm: Carl D wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 3:33pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 3:25pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:37pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:24pm: Lol    ;D https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-became-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg I'd bet that doesn't disgust you. The fact that you twist yourself inside out in a pathetic attempt to justify your anti-science stance doesn't disgust me - it just amuses me. "They don't report on side-effects". Actually, they do - and that has now been proven. "They don't report on the serious side-effects" Nek minnit! "They reported on a serious side-effect". You can't make this stuff up   ;D ;D Sure confuses the heck out of me. Mind you, I have an excuse... I've just finished trudging through aquascoot's latest word salad and it's taking a while for me to recover from that.  ::) There’s nothing confusing to me about it… but then again I think differently… perhaps. Both statements are correct. Given the correct timeline. I see these statements as something summed up at the time and then at advancing times. Hence changes…. For instance …. "They don't report on the serious side-effects" That’s exactly what was happening… in fact way back when test results were being conducted … that 75 year data withholding bs…. Yes… withholding real results …. Like why? Something to hide maybe  :-? And then…. "They reported on a serious side-effect". Yes… it’s eventually coming to surface… and there’s more in time to come…. It’s just the tip of the iceberg. The serious side effects were being withheld… swept under the carpet… That’s why there were none reported earlier. PS: Some of the links trying to convince people of c-vax safety… from 2022 and 2021…. We are almost mid 2023 now. News (and science) change tact. And as if it couldn't be made more obvious that there is a political motive behind the under-reporting, ...

Lol    ;D

You literally posted a link a few hours ago from the BBC saying that someone died as a result of the vax.

"Under-reporting" ?    FFS, you couldn't lie straight in bed.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:12pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 5:24pm: Sophia wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 5:20pm: Carl D wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 3:33pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 3:25pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:37pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:24pm: Lol    ;D https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-became-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg I'd bet that doesn't disgust you. The fact that you twist yourself inside out in a pathetic attempt to justify your anti-science stance doesn't disgust me - it just amuses me. "They don't report on side-effects". Actually, they do - and that has now been proven. "They don't report on the serious side-effects" Nek minnit! "They reported on a serious side-effect". You can't make this stuff up   ;D ;D Sure confuses the heck out of me. Mind you, I have an excuse... I've just finished trudging through aquascoot's latest word salad and it's taking a while for me to recover from that.  ::) There’s nothing confusing to me about it… but then again I think differently… perhaps. Both statements are correct. Given the correct timeline. I see these statements as something summed up at the time and then at advancing times. Hence changes…. For instance …. "They don't report on the serious side-effects" That’s exactly what was happening… in fact way back when test results were being conducted … that 75 year data withholding bs…. Yes… withholding real results …. Like why? Something to hide maybe  :-? And then…. "They reported on a serious side-effect". Yes… it’s eventually coming to surface… and there’s more in time to come…. It’s just the tip of the iceberg. The serious side effects were being withheld… swept under the carpet… That’s why there were none reported earlier. PS: Some of the links trying to convince people of c-vax safety… from 2022 and 2021…. We are almost mid 2023 now. News (and science) change tact. And as if it couldn't be made more obvious that there is a political motive behind the under-reporting, ... Lol    ;D You literally posted a link a few hours ago from the BBC saying that someone died as a result of the vax. "Under-reporting" ?    FFS, you couldn't lie straight in bed.

No, those were your links, you nonce - all published 1 to 2 years ago.

Why did Thalidomide stop becoming the science for morning sickness? Why was Frances Kelsey defamed by big pharma and government for preventing the introduction of Thalidomide into the US?

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:36pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 6:12pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 5:24pm: Sophia wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 5:20pm: Carl D wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 3:33pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 3:25pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:37pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:24pm: Lol    ;D https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-became-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg I'd bet that doesn't disgust you. The fact that you twist yourself inside out in a pathetic attempt to justify your anti-science stance doesn't disgust me - it just amuses me. "They don't report on side-effects". Actually, they do - and that has now been proven. "They don't report on the serious side-effects" Nek minnit! "They reported on a serious side-effect". You can't make this stuff up   ;D ;D Sure confuses the heck out of me. Mind you, I have an excuse... I've just finished trudging through aquascoot's latest word salad and it's taking a while for me to recover from that.  ::) There’s nothing confusing to me about it… but then again I think differently… perhaps. Both statements are correct. Given the correct timeline. I see these statements as something summed up at the time and then at advancing times. Hence changes…. For instance …. "They don't report on the serious side-effects" That’s exactly what was happening… in fact way back when test results were being conducted … that 75 year data withholding bs…. Yes… withholding real results …. Like why? Something to hide maybe  :-? And then…. "They reported on a serious side-effect". Yes… it’s eventually coming to surface… and there’s more in time to come…. It’s just the tip of the iceberg. The serious side effects were being withheld… swept under the carpet… That’s why there were none reported earlier. PS: Some of the links trying to convince people of c-vax safety… from 2022 and 2021…. We are almost mid 2023 now. News (and science) change tact. And as if it couldn't be made more obvious that there is a political motive behind the under-reporting, ... Lol    ;D You literally posted a link a few hours ago from the BBC saying that someone died as a result of the vax. "Under-reporting" ?    FFS, you couldn't lie straight in bed. No, those were your links, you nonce - all published 1 to 2 years ago.

No.

YOU posted a story from the BBC reporting a death.

FFS, you can't even remember something from a few hours ago.

YOU: "The irony is that a BBC reporter Lisa Shaw (44) died a week after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine in May 2021. Her autopsy report from the coroner identifies the vaccine as the cause."

By the way, I'll give you 2 minutes to delete the "nonce" reference.

https://i.ibb.co/xCj3rFw/Musk.jpg

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:56pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 6:36pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 6:12pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 5:24pm: Sophia wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 5:20pm: Carl D wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 3:33pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 3:25pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:37pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:24pm: Lol    ;D https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-became-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg I'd bet that doesn't disgust you. The fact that you twist yourself inside out in a pathetic attempt to justify your anti-science stance doesn't disgust me - it just amuses me. "They don't report on side-effects". Actually, they do - and that has now been proven. "They don't report on the serious side-effects" Nek minnit! "They reported on a serious side-effect". You can't make this stuff up   ;D ;D Sure confuses the heck out of me. Mind you, I have an excuse... I've just finished trudging through aquascoot's latest word salad and it's taking a while for me to recover from that.  ::) There’s nothing confusing to me about it… but then again I think differently… perhaps. Both statements are correct. Given the correct timeline. I see these statements as something summed up at the time and then at advancing times. Hence changes…. For instance …. "They don't report on the serious side-effects" That’s exactly what was happening… in fact way back when test results were being conducted … that 75 year data withholding bs…. Yes… withholding real results …. Like why? Something to hide maybe  :-? And then…. "They reported on a serious side-effect". Yes… it’s eventually coming to surface… and there’s more in time to come…. It’s just the tip of the iceberg. The serious side effects were being withheld… swept under the carpet… That’s why there were none reported earlier. PS: Some of the links trying to convince people of c-vax safety… from 2022 and 2021…. We are almost mid 2023 now. News (and science) change tact. And as if it couldn't be made more obvious that there is a political motive behind the under-reporting, ... Lol    ;D You literally posted a link a few hours ago from the BBC saying that someone died as a result of the vax. "Under-reporting" ?    FFS, you couldn't lie straight in bed. No, those were your links, you nonce - all published 1 to 2 years ago. No. YOU posted a story from the BBC reporting a death. FFS, you can't even remember something from a few hours ago. YOU: "The irony is that a BBC reporter Lisa Shaw (44) died a week after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine in May 2021. Her autopsy report from the coroner identifies the vaccine as the cause." By the way, I'll give you 2 minutes to delete the "nonce" reference.

Well, I gave you more than 10 minutes to delete it.

You only have yourself to blame now.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 6:56pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 6:36pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 6:12pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 5:24pm: Sophia wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 5:20pm: Carl D wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 3:33pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 3:25pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:37pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:24pm: Lol    ;D https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-became-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg I'd bet that doesn't disgust you. The fact that you twist yourself inside out in a pathetic attempt to justify your anti-science stance doesn't disgust me - it just amuses me. "They don't report on side-effects". Actually, they do - and that has now been proven. "They don't report on the serious side-effects" Nek minnit! "They reported on a serious side-effect". You can't make this stuff up   ;D ;D Sure confuses the heck out of me. Mind you, I have an excuse... I've just finished trudging through aquascoot's latest word salad and it's taking a while for me to recover from that.  ::) There’s nothing confusing to me about it… but then again I think differently… perhaps. Both statements are correct. Given the correct timeline. I see these statements as something summed up at the time and then at advancing times. Hence changes…. For instance …. "They don't report on the serious side-effects" That’s exactly what was happening… in fact way back when test results were being conducted … that 75 year data withholding bs…. Yes… withholding real results …. Like why? Something to hide maybe  :-? And then…. "They reported on a serious side-effect". Yes… it’s eventually coming to surface… and there’s more in time to come…. It’s just the tip of the iceberg. The serious side effects were being withheld… swept under the carpet… That’s why there were none reported earlier. PS: Some of the links trying to convince people of c-vax safety… from 2022 and 2021…. We are almost mid 2023 now. News (and science) change tact. And as if it couldn't be made more obvious that there is a political motive behind the under-reporting, ... Lol    ;D You literally posted a link a few hours ago from the BBC saying that someone died as a result of the vax. "Under-reporting" ?    FFS, you couldn't lie straight in bed. No, those were your links, you nonce - all published 1 to 2 years ago. No. YOU posted a story from the BBC reporting a death. FFS, you can't even remember something from a few hours ago. YOU: "The irony is that a BBC reporter Lisa Shaw (44) died a week after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine in May 2021. Her autopsy report from the coroner identifies the vaccine as the cause." By the way, I'll give you 2 minutes to delete the "nonce" reference.

That was one comment on a report about one vaccine victim who was also a BBC reporter.

There are 75 complainants preparing to sue and at least 1500 people who are claiming injury from the vaccine. It's getting as bad as Thalidomide.

'The science', eh... Like it's a noun.

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:10pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 6:56pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 6:36pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 6:12pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 5:24pm: Sophia wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 5:20pm: Carl D wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 3:33pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 3:25pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:37pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:24pm: Lol    ;D https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-became-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg I'd bet that doesn't disgust you. The fact that you twist yourself inside out in a pathetic attempt to justify your anti-science stance doesn't disgust me - it just amuses me. "They don't report on side-effects". Actually, they do - and that has now been proven. "They don't report on the serious side-effects" Nek minnit! "They reported on a serious side-effect". You can't make this stuff up   ;D ;D Sure confuses the heck out of me. Mind you, I have an excuse... I've just finished trudging through aquascoot's latest word salad and it's taking a while for me to recover from that.  ::) There’s nothing confusing to me about it… but then again I think differently… perhaps. Both statements are correct. Given the correct timeline. I see these statements as something summed up at the time and then at advancing times. Hence changes…. For instance …. "They don't report on the serious side-effects" That’s exactly what was happening… in fact way back when test results were being conducted … that 75 year data withholding bs…. Yes… withholding real results …. Like why? Something to hide maybe  :-? And then…. "They reported on a serious side-effect". Yes… it’s eventually coming to surface… and there’s more in time to come…. It’s just the tip of the iceberg. The serious side effects were being withheld… swept under the carpet… That’s why there were none reported earlier. PS: Some of the links trying to convince people of c-vax safety… from 2022 and 2021…. We are almost mid 2023 now. News (and science) change tact. And as if it couldn't be made more obvious that there is a political motive behind the under-reporting, ... Lol    ;D You literally posted a link a few hours ago from the BBC saying that someone died as a result of the vax. "Under-reporting" ?    FFS, you couldn't lie straight in bed. No, those were your links, you nonce - all published 1 to 2 years ago. No. YOU posted a story from the BBC reporting a death. FFS, you can't even remember something from a few hours ago. YOU: "The irony is that a BBC reporter Lisa Shaw (44) died a week after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine in May 2021. Her autopsy report from the coroner identifies the vaccine as the cause." By the way, I'll give you 2 minutes to delete the "nonce" reference. That was one comment on a report about one vaccine victim who was also a BBC reporter. There are 75 complainants preparing to sue and at least 1500 people who are claiming injury from the vaccine. It's getting as bad as Thalidomide. 'The science', eh... Like it's a noun.

I gave you more than enough time to remove the reference to me as a "nonce".

I was more than fair.

It's up to the mods now.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:12pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 7:10pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 6:56pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 6:36pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 6:12pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 5:24pm: Sophia wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 5:20pm: Carl D wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 3:33pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 3:25pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:37pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:24pm: Lol    ;D https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-became-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg I'd bet that doesn't disgust you. The fact that you twist yourself inside out in a pathetic attempt to justify your anti-science stance doesn't disgust me - it just amuses me. "They don't report on side-effects". Actually, they do - and that has now been proven. "They don't report on the serious side-effects" Nek minnit! "They reported on a serious side-effect". You can't make this stuff up   ;D ;D Sure confuses the heck out of me. Mind you, I have an excuse... I've just finished trudging through aquascoot's latest word salad and it's taking a while for me to recover from that.  ::) There’s nothing confusing to me about it… but then again I think differently… perhaps. Both statements are correct. Given the correct timeline. I see these statements as something summed up at the time and then at advancing times. Hence changes…. For instance …. "They don't report on the serious side-effects" That’s exactly what was happening… in fact way back when test results were being conducted … that 75 year data withholding bs…. Yes… withholding real results …. Like why? Something to hide maybe  :-? And then…. "They reported on a serious side-effect". Yes… it’s eventually coming to surface… and there’s more in time to come…. It’s just the tip of the iceberg. The serious side effects were being withheld… swept under the carpet… That’s why there were none reported earlier. PS: Some of the links trying to convince people of c-vax safety… from 2022 and 2021…. We are almost mid 2023 now. News (and science) change tact. And as if it couldn't be made more obvious that there is a political motive behind the under-reporting, ... Lol    ;D You literally posted a link a few hours ago from the BBC saying that someone died as a result of the vax. "Under-reporting" ?    FFS, you couldn't lie straight in bed. No, those were your links, you nonce - all published 1 to 2 years ago. No. YOU posted a story from the BBC reporting a death. FFS, you can't even remember something from a few hours ago. YOU: "The irony is that a BBC reporter Lisa Shaw (44) died a week after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine in May 2021. Her autopsy report from the coroner identifies the vaccine as the cause." By the way, I'll give you 2 minutes to delete the "nonce" reference. That was one comment on a report about one vaccine victim who was also a BBC reporter. There are 75 complainants preparing to sue and at least 1500 people who are claiming injury from the vaccine. It's getting as bad as Thalidomide. 'The science', eh... Like it's a noun. I gave you more than enough time to remove the reference to me as a "nonce". I was more than fair. It's up to the mods now.

What would you prefer? Twat?

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:13pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 7:12pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 7:10pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 6:56pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 6:36pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 6:12pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 5:24pm: Sophia wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 5:20pm: Carl D wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 3:33pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 3:25pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:37pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:24pm: Lol    ;D https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-became-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg I'd bet that doesn't disgust you. The fact that you twist yourself inside out in a pathetic attempt to justify your anti-science stance doesn't disgust me - it just amuses me. "They don't report on side-effects". Actually, they do - and that has now been proven. "They don't report on the serious side-effects" Nek minnit! "They reported on a serious side-effect". You can't make this stuff up   ;D ;D Sure confuses the heck out of me. Mind you, I have an excuse... I've just finished trudging through aquascoot's latest word salad and it's taking a while for me to recover from that.  ::) There’s nothing confusing to me about it… but then again I think differently… perhaps. Both statements are correct. Given the correct timeline. I see these statements as something summed up at the time and then at advancing times. Hence changes…. For instance …. "They don't report on the serious side-effects" That’s exactly what was happening… in fact way back when test results were being conducted … that 75 year data withholding bs…. Yes… withholding real results …. Like why? Something to hide maybe  :-? And then…. "They reported on a serious side-effect". Yes… it’s eventually coming to surface… and there’s more in time to come…. It’s just the tip of the iceberg. The serious side effects were being withheld… swept under the carpet… That’s why there were none reported earlier. PS: Some of the links trying to convince people of c-vax safety… from 2022 and 2021…. We are almost mid 2023 now. News (and science) change tact. And as if it couldn't be made more obvious that there is a political motive behind the under-reporting, ... Lol    ;D You literally posted a link a few hours ago from the BBC saying that someone died as a result of the vax. "Under-reporting" ?    FFS, you couldn't lie straight in bed. No, those were your links, you nonce - all published 1 to 2 years ago. No. YOU posted a story from the BBC reporting a death. FFS, you can't even remember something from a few hours ago. YOU: "The irony is that a BBC reporter Lisa Shaw (44) died a week after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine in May 2021. Her autopsy report from the coroner identifies the vaccine as the cause." By the way, I'll give you 2 minutes to delete the "nonce" reference. That was one comment on a report about one vaccine victim who was also a BBC reporter. There are 75 complainants preparing to sue and at least 1500 people who are claiming injury from the vaccine. It's getting as bad as Thalidomide. 'The science', eh... Like it's a noun. I gave you more than enough time to remove the reference to me as a "nonce". I was more than fair. It's up to the mods now. What would you prefer? Twat?

Calling someone a paedophile/child molester in this forum results in a suspension.

I gave you a fair warning, and you ignored it.

Don't blame me for the consequences.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:15pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 7:13pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 7:12pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 7:10pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 6:56pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 6:36pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 6:12pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 5:24pm: Sophia wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 5:20pm: Carl D wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 3:33pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 3:25pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:37pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:24pm: Lol    ;D https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-became-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg I'd bet that doesn't disgust you. The fact that you twist yourself inside out in a pathetic attempt to justify your anti-science stance doesn't disgust me - it just amuses me. "They don't report on side-effects". Actually, they do - and that has now been proven. "They don't report on the serious side-effects" Nek minnit! "They reported on a serious side-effect". You can't make this stuff up   ;D ;D Sure confuses the heck out of me. Mind you, I have an excuse... I've just finished trudging through aquascoot's latest word salad and it's taking a while for me to recover from that.  ::) There’s nothing confusing to me about it… but then again I think differently… perhaps. Both statements are correct. Given the correct timeline. I see these statements as something summed up at the time and then at advancing times. Hence changes…. For instance …. "They don't report on the serious side-effects" That’s exactly what was happening… in fact way back when test results were being conducted … that 75 year data withholding bs…. Yes… withholding real results …. Like why? Something to hide maybe  :-? And then…. "They reported on a serious side-effect". Yes… it’s eventually coming to surface… and there’s more in time to come…. It’s just the tip of the iceberg. The serious side effects were being withheld… swept under the carpet… That’s why there were none reported earlier. PS: Some of the links trying to convince people of c-vax safety… from 2022 and 2021…. We are almost mid 2023 now. News (and science) change tact. And as if it couldn't be made more obvious that there is a political motive behind the under-reporting, ... Lol    ;D You literally posted a link a few hours ago from the BBC saying that someone died as a result of the vax. "Under-reporting" ?    FFS, you couldn't lie straight in bed. No, those were your links, you nonce - all published 1 to 2 years ago. No. YOU posted a story from the BBC reporting a death. FFS, you can't even remember something from a few hours ago. YOU: "The irony is that a BBC reporter Lisa Shaw (44) died a week after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine in May 2021. Her autopsy report from the coroner identifies the vaccine as the cause." By the way, I'll give you 2 minutes to delete the "nonce" reference. That was one comment on a report about one vaccine victim who was also a BBC reporter. There are 75 complainants preparing to sue and at least 1500 people who are claiming injury from the vaccine. It's getting as bad as Thalidomide. 'The science', eh... Like it's a noun. I gave you more than enough time to remove the reference to me as a "nonce". I was more than fair. It's up to the mods now. What would you prefer? Twat? Calling someone a paedophile/child molester in this forum results in a suspension. I gave you a fair warning, and you ignored it. Don't blame me for the consequences.

Is that what nonce means to you, eh?

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:17pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 7:15pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 7:13pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 7:12pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 7:10pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 6:56pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 6:36pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 6:12pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 5:24pm: Sophia wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 5:20pm: Carl D wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 3:33pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 3:25pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:37pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:24pm: Lol    ;D https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-became-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg I'd bet that doesn't disgust you. The fact that you twist yourself inside out in a pathetic attempt to justify your anti-science stance doesn't disgust me - it just amuses me. "They don't report on side-effects". Actually, they do - and that has now been proven. "They don't report on the serious side-effects" Nek minnit! "They reported on a serious side-effect". You can't make this stuff up   ;D ;D Sure confuses the heck out of me. Mind you, I have an excuse... I've just finished trudging through aquascoot's latest word salad and it's taking a while for me to recover from that.  ::) There’s nothing confusing to me about it… but then again I think differently… perhaps. Both statements are correct. Given the correct timeline. I see these statements as something summed up at the time and then at advancing times. Hence changes…. For instance …. "They don't report on the serious side-effects" That’s exactly what was happening… in fact way back when test results were being conducted … that 75 year data withholding bs…. Yes… withholding real results …. Like why? Something to hide maybe  :-? And then…. "They reported on a serious side-effect". Yes… it’s eventually coming to surface… and there’s more in time to come…. It’s just the tip of the iceberg. The serious side effects were being withheld… swept under the carpet… That’s why there were none reported earlier. PS: Some of the links trying to convince people of c-vax safety… from 2022 and 2021…. We are almost mid 2023 now. News (and science) change tact. And as if it couldn't be made more obvious that there is a political motive behind the under-reporting, ... Lol    ;D You literally posted a link a few hours ago from the BBC saying that someone died as a result of the vax. "Under-reporting" ?    FFS, you couldn't lie straight in bed. No, those were your links, you nonce - all published 1 to 2 years ago. No. YOU posted a story from the BBC reporting a death. FFS, you can't even remember something from a few hours ago. YOU: "The irony is that a BBC reporter Lisa Shaw (44) died a week after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine in May 2021. Her autopsy report from the coroner identifies the vaccine as the cause." By the way, I'll give you 2 minutes to delete the "nonce" reference. That was one comment on a report about one vaccine victim who was also a BBC reporter. There are 75 complainants preparing to sue and at least 1500 people who are claiming injury from the vaccine. It's getting as bad as Thalidomide. 'The science', eh... Like it's a noun. I gave you more than enough time to remove the reference to me as a "nonce". I was more than fair. It's up to the mods now. What would you prefer? Twat? Calling someone a paedophile/child molester in this forum results in a suspension. I gave you a fair warning, and you ignored it. Don't blame me for the consequences. Is that what nonce means to you, eh?

I gave you a fair warning.

"nonce 2. / (nɒns) / noun. prison slang a rapist or child molester; a sexual offender."

You'll probably receive a 48 hour suspension.

I suggest you use it to think about how you handle defeat - when you lose an argument, calling someone a child molester isn't the mature thing to do.

Friendly advice.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:15pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 7:13pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 7:12pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 7:10pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 6:56pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 6:36pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 6:12pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 5:24pm: Sophia wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 5:20pm: Carl D wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 3:33pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 3:25pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:37pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:24pm: Lol    ;D https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-became-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg I'd bet that doesn't disgust you. The fact that you twist yourself inside out in a pathetic attempt to justify your anti-science stance doesn't disgust me - it just amuses me. "They don't report on side-effects". Actually, they do - and that has now been proven. "They don't report on the serious side-effects" Nek minnit! "They reported on a serious side-effect". You can't make this stuff up   ;D ;D Sure confuses the heck out of me. Mind you, I have an excuse... I've just finished trudging through aquascoot's latest word salad and it's taking a while for me to recover from that.  ::) There’s nothing confusing to me about it… but then again I think differently… perhaps. Both statements are correct. Given the correct timeline. I see these statements as something summed up at the time and then at advancing times. Hence changes…. For instance …. "They don't report on the serious side-effects" That’s exactly what was happening… in fact way back when test results were being conducted … that 75 year data withholding bs…. Yes… withholding real results …. Like why? Something to hide maybe  :-? And then…. "They reported on a serious side-effect". Yes… it’s eventually coming to surface… and there’s more in time to come…. It’s just the tip of the iceberg. The serious side effects were being withheld… swept under the carpet… That’s why there were none reported earlier. PS: Some of the links trying to convince people of c-vax safety… from 2022 and 2021…. We are almost mid 2023 now. News (and science) change tact. And as if it couldn't be made more obvious that there is a political motive behind the under-reporting, ... Lol    ;D You literally posted a link a few hours ago from the BBC saying that someone died as a result of the vax. "Under-reporting" ?    FFS, you couldn't lie straight in bed. No, those were your links, you nonce - all published 1 to 2 years ago. No. YOU posted a story from the BBC reporting a death. FFS, you can't even remember something from a few hours ago. YOU: "The irony is that a BBC reporter Lisa Shaw (44) died a week after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine in May 2021. Her autopsy report from the coroner identifies the vaccine as the cause." By the way, I'll give you 2 minutes to delete the "nonce" reference. That was one comment on a report about one vaccine victim who was also a BBC reporter. There are 75 complainants preparing to sue and at least 1500 people who are claiming injury from the vaccine. It's getting as bad as Thalidomide. 'The science', eh... Like it's a noun. I gave you more than enough time to remove the reference to me as a "nonce". I was more than fair. It's up to the mods now. What would you prefer? Twat? Calling someone a paedophile/child molester in this forum results in a suspension. I gave you a fair warning, and you ignored it. Don't blame me for the consequences.

You've made a fetish out of suggesting someone is a child rapist - sure you slap 'alleged' to it, but you make your point over and over again. Why is that, really?

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:17pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 7:15pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 7:13pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 7:12pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 7:10pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 6:56pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 6:36pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 6:12pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 5:24pm: Sophia wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 5:20pm: Carl D wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 3:33pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 3:25pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:37pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:24pm: Lol    ;D https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-became-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg I'd bet that doesn't disgust you. The fact that you twist yourself inside out in a pathetic attempt to justify your anti-science stance doesn't disgust me - it just amuses me. "They don't report on side-effects". Actually, they do - and that has now been proven. "They don't report on the serious side-effects" Nek minnit! "They reported on a serious side-effect". You can't make this stuff up   ;D ;D Sure confuses the heck out of me. Mind you, I have an excuse... I've just finished trudging through aquascoot's latest word salad and it's taking a while for me to recover from that.  ::) There’s nothing confusing to me about it… but then again I think differently… perhaps. Both statements are correct. Given the correct timeline. I see these statements as something summed up at the time and then at advancing times. Hence changes…. For instance …. "They don't report on the serious side-effects" That’s exactly what was happening… in fact way back when test results were being conducted … that 75 year data withholding bs…. Yes… withholding real results …. Like why? Something to hide maybe  :-? And then…. "They reported on a serious side-effect". Yes… it’s eventually coming to surface… and there’s more in time to come…. It’s just the tip of the iceberg. The serious side effects were being withheld… swept under the carpet… That’s why there were none reported earlier. PS: Some of the links trying to convince people of c-vax safety… from 2022 and 2021…. We are almost mid 2023 now. News (and science) change tact. And as if it couldn't be made more obvious that there is a political motive behind the under-reporting, ... Lol    ;D You literally posted a link a few hours ago from the BBC saying that someone died as a result of the vax. "Under-reporting" ?    FFS, you couldn't lie straight in bed. No, those were your links, you nonce - all published 1 to 2 years ago. No. YOU posted a story from the BBC reporting a death. FFS, you can't even remember something from a few hours ago. YOU: "The irony is that a BBC reporter Lisa Shaw (44) died a week after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine in May 2021. Her autopsy report from the coroner identifies the vaccine as the cause." By the way, I'll give you 2 minutes to delete the "nonce" reference. That was one comment on a report about one vaccine victim who was also a BBC reporter. There are 75 complainants preparing to sue and at least 1500 people who are claiming injury from the vaccine. It's getting as bad as Thalidomide. 'The science', eh... Like it's a noun. I gave you more than enough time to remove the reference to me as a "nonce". I was more than fair. It's up to the mods now. What would you prefer? Twat? Calling someone a paedophile/child molester in this forum results in a suspension. I gave you a fair warning, and you ignored it. Don't blame me for the consequences. Is that what nonce means to you, eh?

gweg has a Ph D in this area meister. he has studied it relentlessly.
it is always on his mind. :-/ :-/ :-/ :-/

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:22pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 7:15pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 7:13pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 7:12pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 7:10pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 6:56pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 6:36pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 6:12pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 5:24pm: Sophia wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 5:20pm: Carl D wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 3:33pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 3:25pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:37pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 2:24pm: Lol    ;D https://s3.memeshappen.com/memes/They-said-I-could-be-anything-I-became-a-PRETZEL-meme-55281.jpg I'd bet that doesn't disgust you. The fact that you twist yourself inside out in a pathetic attempt to justify your anti-science stance doesn't disgust me - it just amuses me. "They don't report on side-effects". Actually, they do - and that has now been proven. "They don't report on the serious side-effects" Nek minnit! "They reported on a serious side-effect". You can't make this stuff up   ;D ;D Sure confuses the heck out of me. Mind you, I have an excuse... I've just finished trudging through aquascoot's latest word salad and it's taking a while for me to recover from that.  ::) There’s nothing confusing to me about it… but then again I think differently… perhaps. Both statements are correct. Given the correct timeline. I see these statements as something summed up at the time and then at advancing times. Hence changes…. For instance …. "They don't report on the serious side-effects" That’s exactly what was happening… in fact way back when test results were being conducted … that 75 year data withholding bs…. Yes… withholding real results …. Like why? Something to hide maybe  :-? And then…. "They reported on a serious side-effect". Yes… it’s eventually coming to surface… and there’s more in time to come…. It’s just the tip of the iceberg. The serious side effects were being withheld… swept under the carpet… That’s why there were none reported earlier. PS: Some of the links trying to convince people of c-vax safety… from 2022 and 2021…. We are almost mid 2023 now. News (and science) change tact. And as if it couldn't be made more obvious that there is a political motive behind the under-reporting, ... Lol    ;D You literally posted a link a few hours ago from the BBC saying that someone died as a result of the vax. "Under-reporting" ?    FFS, you couldn't lie straight in bed. No, those were your links, you nonce - all published 1 to 2 years ago. No. YOU posted a story from the BBC reporting a death. FFS, you can't even remember something from a few hours ago. YOU: "The irony is that a BBC reporter Lisa Shaw (44) died a week after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine in May 2021. Her autopsy report from the coroner identifies the vaccine as the cause." By the way, I'll give you 2 minutes to delete the "nonce" reference. That was one comment on a report about one vaccine victim who was also a BBC reporter. There are 75 complainants preparing to sue and at least 1500 people who are claiming injury from the vaccine. It's getting as bad as Thalidomide. 'The science', eh... Like it's a noun. I gave you more than enough time to remove the reference to me as a "nonce". I was more than fair. It's up to the mods now. What would you prefer? Twat? Calling someone a paedophile/child molester in this forum results in a suspension. I gave you a fair warning, and you ignored it. Don't blame me for the consequences. You've made a fetish out of suggesting someone is a child rapist - sure you slap 'alleged' to it, but you make your point over and over again. Why is that, really?

I haven't suggested or alleged anything.

I've merely reported the facts:

Criminal defendant Donald J. Trump IS an alleged child rapist.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:19pm:

I gave you a fair warning. "nonce 2. / (nɒns) / noun. prison slang a rapist or child molester; a sexual offender." You'll probably receive a 48 hour suspension. I suggest you use it to think about how you handle defeat - when you lose an argument, calling someone a child molester isn't the mature thing to do. Friendly advice.

It's used in that way in Britain. Are you posting from Britain?

We use the word Paki in Australia to refer to the Pakistanis in cricket when the Pakistani team is in Australia. A term that cannot be used in Britain.

I suggest you check your fixation on sexual matters.

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:27pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 7:19pm: I gave you a fair warning. "nonce 2. / (nɒns) / noun. prison slang a rapist or child molester; a sexual offender." You'll probably receive a 48 hour suspension. I suggest you use it to think about how you handle defeat - when you lose an argument, calling someone a child molester isn't the mature thing to do. Friendly advice. It's used in that way in Britain. Are you posting from Britain? We use the word Paki in Australia to refer to the Pakistanis in cricket when the Pakistani team is in Australia. A term that cannot be used in Britain. I suggest you check your fixation on sexual matters.

Take it up with the mods after your suspension.

"nonce 2. / (nɒns) / noun. prison slang a rapist or child molester; a sexual offender."

You don't get to make up your own definitions of words.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:28pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 7:27pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 7:19pm: I gave you a fair warning. "nonce 2. / (nɒns) / noun. prison slang a rapist or child molester; a sexual offender." You'll probably receive a 48 hour suspension. I suggest you use it to think about how you handle defeat - when you lose an argument, calling someone a child molester isn't the mature thing to do. Friendly advice. It's used in that way in Britain. Are you posting from Britain? We use the word Paki in Australia to refer to the Pakistanis in cricket when the Pakistani team is in Australia. A term that cannot be used in Britain. I suggest you check your fixation on sexual matters. Take it up with the mods after your suspension. "nonce 2. / (nɒns) / noun. prison slang a rapist or child molester; a sexual offender." You don't get to make up your own definitions of words.

Check the definition in the Oxford and the Merriam-Webster dictionaries - you don't get to choose the culture where a word is used in other ways and apply it here.

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:31pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 7:28pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 7:27pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 7:19pm: I gave you a fair warning. "nonce 2. / (nɒns) / noun. prison slang a rapist or child molester; a sexual offender." You'll probably receive a 48 hour suspension. I suggest you use it to think about how you handle defeat - when you lose an argument, calling someone a child molester isn't the mature thing to do. Friendly advice. It's used in that way in Britain. Are you posting from Britain? We use the word Paki in Australia to refer to the Pakistanis in cricket when the Pakistani team is in Australia. A term that cannot be used in Britain. I suggest you check your fixation on sexual matters. Take it up with the mods after your suspension. "nonce 2. / (nɒns) / noun. prison slang a rapist or child molester; a sexual offender." You don't get to make up your own definitions of words. Check the definition in the Oxford and the Merriam-Webster dictionaries - you don't get to choose the culture where a word is used in other ways and apply it here.

Take it up with the mods after your suspension.

See you in a few days.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:32pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 7:31pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 7:28pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 7:27pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 7:19pm: I gave you a fair warning. "nonce 2. / (nɒns) / noun. prison slang a rapist or child molester; a sexual offender." You'll probably receive a 48 hour suspension. I suggest you use it to think about how you handle defeat - when you lose an argument, calling someone a child molester isn't the mature thing to do. Friendly advice. It's used in that way in Britain. Are you posting from Britain? We use the word Paki in Australia to refer to the Pakistanis in cricket when the Pakistani team is in Australia. A term that cannot be used in Britain. I suggest you check your fixation on sexual matters. Take it up with the mods after your suspension. "nonce 2. / (nɒns) / noun. prison slang a rapist or child molester; a sexual offender." You don't get to make up your own definitions of words. Check the definition in the Oxford and the Merriam-Webster dictionaries - you don't get to choose the culture where a word is used in other ways and apply it here. Take it up with the mods after your suspension. See you in a few days.

Well, well, well you're (how would you put it?), triggered.

Why is that?

You know Peccary has lost the argument when he resorts to stupid memes.  ;D

Media Reporter: "Do you agree that you promote Evil?" attackingly.

Internet Musk: "Do you agree that you promote Evil?" defensively.

Musk was like Kostya Tszyu making the Media Reporter look like Zab Judah.  ;D

The Media lackey came out swinging and Musk dodged, weaved and put him on his arse with a counter-punch upper-cut.  8-)

Jasin wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:43pm:

[]You know Peccary has lost the argument when he resorts to stupid memes.  ;D Media Reporter: "Do you agree that you promote Evil?" attackingly. Internet Musk: "Do you agree that you promote Evil?" defensively. Musk was like Kostya Tszyu making the Media Reporter look like Zab Judah.  ;D The Media lackey came out swinging and Musk dodged, weaved and put him on his arse with a counter-punch upper-cut  8-)

That's not hard when you're dealing with a journalist that weak - put up against the likes of Musk.

Where were the hardened, experienced BBC journalists?

They pushed a baby into the ring.

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:47pm:

Jasin wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 7:43pm: []You know Peccary has lost the argument when he resorts to stupid memes.  ;D Media Reporter: "Do you agree that you promote Evil?" attackingly. Internet Musk: "Do you agree that you promote Evil?" defensively. Musk was like Kostya Tszyu making the Media Reporter look like Zab Judah.  ;D The Media lackey came out swinging and Musk dodged, weaved and put him on his arse with a counter-punch upper-cut  8-) That's not hard when you're dealing with a journalist that weak - put up against the likes of Musk. Where were the hardened, experienced BBC journalists? They pushed a baby into the ring.

He seemed cocky, up himself, superior Media type and went on the attack straight away with a 'negative' take.
I reckon even the best BBC had to offer would have come off just the same with that 'take' against Musk.
Musk is not one to be 'bullied' by the Media that sees the Internet as a threat, as it always has since it first appeared like a new competitor.

Jasin wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:51pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 7:47pm: Jasin wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 7:43pm: []You know Peccary has lost the argument when he resorts to stupid memes.  ;D Media Reporter: "Do you agree that you promote Evil?" attackingly. Internet Musk: "Do you agree that you promote Evil?" defensively. Musk was like Kostya Tszyu making the Media Reporter look like Zab Judah.  ;D The Media lackey came out swinging and Musk dodged, weaved and put him on his arse with a counter-punch upper-cut  8-) That's not hard when you're dealing with a journalist that weak - put up against the likes of Musk. Where were the hardened, experienced BBC journalists? They pushed a baby into the ring. He seemed cocky, up himself, superior Media type and went on the attack straight away with a 'negative' take. I reckon even the best BBC had to offer would have come off just the same with that 'take' against Musk. Musk is not one to be 'bullied' by the Media that sees the Internet as a threat, as it always has since it first appeared like a new competitor.

Yes. That'd be why the BBC 'tough-guy' journalists served up a baby - fear of social humiliation. The baby didn't see the danger and his mentors likely told him he'd be fine - texting him questions from the safety of the BBC cafeteria.

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 7:55pm:

Jasin wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 7:51pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 7:47pm: Jasin wrote on Apr 13th, 2023 at 7:43pm: []You know Peccary has lost the argument when he resorts to stupid memes.  ;D Media Reporter: "Do you agree that you promote Evil?" attackingly. Internet Musk: "Do you agree that you promote Evil?" defensively. Musk was like Kostya Tszyu making the Media Reporter look like Zab Judah.  ;D The Media lackey came out swinging and Musk dodged, weaved and put him on his arse with a counter-punch upper-cut  8-) That's not hard when you're dealing with a journalist that weak - put up against the likes of Musk. Where were the hardened, experienced BBC journalists? They pushed a baby into the ring. He seemed cocky, up himself, superior Media type and went on the attack straight away with a 'negative' take. I reckon even the best BBC had to offer would have come off just the same with that 'take' against Musk. Musk is not one to be 'bullied' by the Media that sees the Internet as a threat, as it always has since it first appeared like a new competitor. Yes. That'd be why the BBC 'tough-guy' journalists served up a baby - fear of social humiliation. The baby didn't see the danger and his mentors likely told him he'd be fine - texting him questions from the safety of the BBC cafeteria.

Exactly !  ;D

Wow, check out how this LW rag denigrates Musk in that interview. They got the hate Musk memo I guess.

although for me the real takeaway has been that you can be the second richest man in the world and still struggle to find dental veneers that fit.

the thin skin of the tech billionaire became evident

Musk fidgeted in his seat and reached down for his water

We learned that, like my eight-year-olds, when Musk gets animated he reaches for the word “literally”
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/apr/12/bbc-elon-musk-sense-of-humour-twitter

Gordon wrote on Apr 13^th, 2023 at 8:02pm:

Wow, check out how this LW rag denigrates Musk in that interview. They got the hate Musk memo I guess. although for me the real takeaway has been that you can be the second richest man in the world and still struggle to find dental veneers that fit. the thin skin of the tech billionaire became evident Musk fidgeted in his seat and reached down for his water We learned that, like my eight-year-olds, when Musk gets animated he reaches for the word “literally” https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/apr/12/bbc-elon-musk-sense-of-humour-twitter

The idea that the reactive instinct in humans can be eradicated  (like the feeling you get when you're in a car and someone cuts you off), is like trying to eradicate farting in public places.

Now that the interview is over, expect tough-guy journalists and writers to bore us with how they'd have done it better.

Anyone can win the game that was played yesterday.

Having watched the full interview, the Musk/Clayton interview is as embarrassing an own goal by the BBC as the famous Channel 4 interview was for Cathy Newman with Jordan Peterson, which catapulted Peterson so emphatically onto the world stage.

TOTALLY PATHETIC!

Skip Prince King Charles's family tree stuff to 4:20 and enjoy the Journalist being ripped apart by other Journalists and the comment that his 'interview' style came from the American Media 'narrative'...  ;)
Enjoy.
https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/other/utterly-pathetic-douglas-murray-slams-bbc-interview-with-elon-musk/ar-AA19RNmH?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=940de4ae2294432a9c023a4a650861cd&ei=9

Watching that Journalist was like watching Mothra, Smith, Peccary, Philperth, Dnarever - all roled in one.  ;D

I'm a journalist, I can say anything, and if its wrong, I can use the excuse that it was investigative and in the public interest to say it. Rather like ABC vague allegations of corruption before the last Federal election.

On a points game you could say Elton won. But he won on diversion he couldn't answer any questions.

It wasn't that he was right or anything like that.

In fact he did a good job of defending a lost position.

A great job of not answering any questions.

Remember at the end of the day this is the same dill that bought Twitter for about $40 Billion more than it was worth and is running it into the ground.

There was no diversion against someone making accusations of evil while representing an Evil Media itself. The evilness showed in his behaviour and personal denials.
It was like watching Nazi Germany accusing Britain of Politics and Military.  ;D

Jasin wrote on Apr 16^th, 2023 at 12:31pm:

Watching that Journalist was like watching Mothra, Smith, Peccary, Philperth, Dnarever - all roled in one.  ;D

I suspect anyone on that list would have had the facts to make Elton look as silly as he normally does. It's not like he was clever about not answering any questions.  The journalist should have just shut him down.

That Journalist didn't even get to first base. He struck out.  ;D

Jasin wrote on Apr 16^th, 2023 at 2:13pm:

That Journalist didn't even get to first base. He struck out.  ;D

Yes true but that doesn't make Elton right.

Dnarever wrote on Apr 16^th, 2023 at 2:16pm:

Jasin wrote on Apr 16th, 2023 at 2:13pm: That Journalist didn't even get to first base. He struck out.  ;D Yes true but that doesn't make Elton right.

It does in a way that Musk represents the Internet that doesn't have to bend the knee to the Media - which is what the Media via that Journalist expected him to do.

The obvious fact is the journalist thought Musk would respond to vague allegations other journalists had made . . . because that is what he would do in Musk's position. And he hoped for some kind of scoop he could brag about. These bastards get to mold public opinion with innuendo, and they get away with it all the time.

Jasin wrote on Apr 16^th, 2023 at 2:24pm:

Dnarever wrote on Apr 16th, 2023 at 2:16pm: Jasin wrote on Apr 16th, 2023 at 2:13pm: That Journalist didn't even get to first base. He struck out.  ;D Yes true but that doesn't make Elton right. It does in a way that Musk represents the Internet that doesn't have to bend the knee to the Media - which is what the Media via that Journalist expected him to do.

An expectation that he would answer the questions that he had agreed to the interview to answer, how dare they.

Media ego got burned, fried and poached!!!
Reckon Murdoch probably cringed as well.

One thing we're all going to have to accept - It is in human nature to be occasionally mean-spirited, machiavellian and overtly narcissistic, particularly under the cover of anonymity, in the same way it is universal that we all feel an instinctive sense of rage when we're cut off in traffic.

No one can prevent spiteful, aggressive, (yes even hateful) responses on social media any more than you can prevent dogs wanting to sh!t in a park or people farting in public.

Musk should not be held accountable for not preventing every instance of human nature's darker side (with the exception of illegal statements) and, let's face it, the BBC is OK with being machiavellian or lying by commission/omission when it suits them - another human instinct: deceiving in the interests of self.

That's true.
But the Media's need to use the Internet as evil, to virtual signal itself and try to make itself holier than though - seems to be falling short these days.

Uh... chaps...

The bloke's name is actually Elon.


Quote:

Yes true but that doesn't make Elton right... ...would have had the facts to make Elton look as silly as he normally does. On a points game you could say Elton won...

—And I know it's a poofter name, but at least
   give him the disrespect he deserves.

AusGeoff wrote on Apr 16^th, 2023 at 7:52pm:

Uh... chaps... The bloke's name is actually Elon. Quote: Yes true but that doesn't make Elton right... ...would have had the facts to make Elton look as silly as he normally does. On a points game you could say Elton won... —And I know it's a poofter name, but at least    give him the disrespect he deserves.

Shooting the messenger again because the messenger doesn't support the British Biscuit Company's corrupt agenda :(

AusGeoff wrote on Apr 16^th, 2023 at 7:52pm:

Uh... chaps... The bloke's name is actually Elon. Quote: Yes true but that doesn't make Elton right... ...would have had the facts to make Elton look as silly as he normally does. On a points game you could say Elton won... —And I know it's a poofter name, but at least    give him the disrespect he deserves.

Are you sure about that, Geoff?

https://www.reddit.com/r/memes/comments/b07fcb/elton_musk/

;D

Sorry - I couldn't resist.

Pretty poor Photoshop job I might add.

Oh, and...

https://imgflip.com/i/72yy0r

8-)

Sir lastnail wrote on Apr 16^th, 2023 at 7:59pm:

AusGeoff wrote on Apr 16th, 2023 at 7:52pm: Uh... chaps... The bloke's name is actually Elon. Quote: Yes true but that doesn't make Elton right... ...would have had the facts to make Elton look as silly as he normally does. On a points game you could say Elton won... —And I know it's a poofter name, but at least    give him the disrespect he deserves. Shooting the messenger again because the messenger doesn't support the British Biscuit Company's corrupt agenda :(

There was no message - what you talking about. All he did was to avoid anything worth hearing. All he did was sabotage the interview.

AusGeoff wrote on Apr 16^th, 2023 at 7:52pm:

Uh... chaps... The bloke's name is actually Elon. Quote: Yes true but that doesn't make Elton right... ...would have had the facts to make Elton look as silly as he normally does. On a points game you could say Elton won... —And I know it's a poofter name, but at least    give him the disrespect he deserves.

Don't correct him Geoff.
He'll say you're 'deflecting'.  ;D

Dnarever is upset because Elon in the name of the Internet wouldn't bow down to the Media's superiority and grovel.

If the interview went on - the Journalist would start accusing Musk with Racist, Heretic, Homophobe, etc.
Another big mistake the Journalist made was that he based everything upon what Eastern (New York) Americans wrote and not what 'Europe' thought.

Like I said - he reminded me of how Mothra, Smith, Peccary, Philperth, Dnarever here go about things against other members.  ;D

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 16^th, 2023 at 6:58pm:

One thing we're all going to have to accept - It is in human nature to be occasionally mean-spirited, machiavellian and overtly narcissistic, particularly under the cover of anonymity, in the same way it is universal that we all feel an instinctive sense of rage when we're cut off in traffic. No one can prevent spiteful, aggressive, (yes even hateful) responses on social media any more than you can prevent dogs wanting to sh!t in a park or people farting in public. Musk should not be held accountable for not preventing every instance of human nature's darker side (with the exception of illegal statements) and, let's face it, the BBC is OK with being machiavellian or lying by commission/omission when it suits them - another human instinct: deceiving in the interests of self.

Right, and it is exacerbated in the case of celebrity where one is told how wonderful they are 24/7. This can be the same for vast wealth where one is insulated from the real world, I have seen this first hand as an observer.

Check it out. Even Dr John Campbell chimes in ;)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HdJAJknnfbA

Jasin wrote on Apr 17^th, 2023 at 4:30am:

Dnarever is upset because Elon in the name of the Internet wouldn't bow down to the Media's superiority and grovel. If the interview went on - the Journalist would start accusing Musk with Racist, Heretic, Homophobe, etc. Another big mistake the Journalist made was that he based everything upon what Eastern (New York) Americans wrote and not what 'Europe' thought. Like I said - he reminded me of how Mothra, Smith, Peccary, Philperth, Dnarever here go about things against other members.  ;D

Quote:

he reminded me of how Mothra, Smith, Peccary, Philperth, Dnarever here go about things against other members

Actually it is the direct opposite, those named here tend to deal in fact and avoid deflection and avoidance. The traits you guys are most proficient with. For instance in this interview Musk avoided all questions and avoided all fact - sound like the guy you see in the mirror each morning ?

Do you recall ever posting a fact that was actually correct or if so what decade it was in?  This is you, Frank and co.

Elon Musk said what every Interneter has been wanting to say to the Big Brother Media: "Go F*uck Yourself"  ;D ;D

The Journalist would have had a seizure if it went on. Media can't cope with people out there that doesn't play by 'their' rules and narrative.  ;D ;D

issuevoter wrote on Apr 17^th, 2023 at 7:50am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 16th, 2023 at 6:58pm: One thing we're all going to have to accept - It is in human nature to be occasionally mean-spirited, machiavellian and overtly narcissistic, particularly under the cover of anonymity, in the same way it is universal that we all feel an instinctive sense of rage when we're cut off in traffic. No one can prevent spiteful, aggressive, (yes even hateful) responses on social media any more than you can prevent dogs wanting to sh!t in a park or people farting in public. Musk should not be held accountable for not preventing every instance of human nature's darker side (with the exception of illegal statements) and, let's face it, the BBC is OK with being machiavellian or lying by commission/omission when it suits them - another human instinct: deceiving in the interests of self. Right, and it is exacerbated in the case of celebrity where one is told how wonderful they are 24/7. This can be the same for vast wealth where one is insulated from the real world, I have seen this first hand as an observer.

Well, yes. The pursuit of high status for its obvious social advantages is older than human history.

As is bending the knee to high-status individuals, (or chucking rocks at them), is also older than human history.

In the case of the BBC sending in an underskilled journalist to face off with one of the world's highest-status individuals, is a testament to the BBC's corporate cowardice.

Jasin wrote on Apr 17^th, 2023 at 10:02am:

Elon Musk said what every Interneter has been wanting to say to the Big Brother Media: "Go F**k Yourself"  ;D ;D The Journalist would have had a seizure if it went on. Media can't cope with people out there that doesn't play by 'their' rules and narrative.  ;D ;D

Yes Elton has been telling everyone in the world to do that for years. How does it help with anything? How did he do anything other than to waste everyone's time?

Dnarever wrote on Apr 17^th, 2023 at 11:10am:

Jasin wrote on Apr 17th, 2023 at 10:02am: Elon Musk said what every Interneter has been wanting to say to the Big Brother Media: "Go F**k Yourself"  ;D ;D The Journalist would have had a seizure if it went on. Media can't cope with people out there that doesn't play by 'their' rules and narrative.  ;D ;D Yes Elton has been telling everyone in the world to do that for years. How does it help with anything? How did he do anything other than to waste everyone's time?

Yes, of course... Enter Monty Python... What has Musk ever done for us anyway?

How does he waste your time? You're just another codger on a bitching-bender.

issuevoter wrote on Apr 17^th, 2023 at 7:50am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 16th, 2023 at 6:58pm: One thing we're all going to have to accept - It is in human nature to be occasionally mean-spirited, machiavellian and overtly narcissistic, particularly under the cover of anonymity, in the same way it is universal that we all feel an instinctive sense of rage when we're cut off in traffic. No one can prevent spiteful, aggressive, (yes even hateful) responses on social media any more than you can prevent dogs wanting to sh!t in a park or people farting in public. Musk should not be held accountable for not preventing every instance of human nature's darker side (with the exception of illegal statements) and, let's face it, the BBC is OK with being machiavellian or lying by commission/omission when it suits them - another human instinct: deceiving in the interests of self. Right, and it is exacerbated in the case of celebrity where one is told how wonderful they are 24/7. This can be the same for vast wealth where one is insulated from the real world, I have seen this first hand as an observer.

ID actually flip that arguement on its head

I don't think that musk has a problem where he is being told how wonderful he is 24/7
The guy is running complex multiple businesses
And is probably handling stress 24/7
Thousands of emails
Hundreds of legal issues
Hundreds of diverse staff he is trying to coordinate
I would imagine the guy is fairly grounded

Where I think the problem lies is with armchair critics
Who think they are a lot smarter than they are
And they see musk and his high status
And they think I am high status as well
Why aren't I getting any attention

That really touches a nerve with the ego of people who lack humility

And so their petty little ego can get a little hit of dopamine
By declaring themselves smarter than musk

It's a laughable proposition
That people like Carl actually have the audacity to think they are smarter than musk
Who's achievements probably rival those of Albert Einstein


It's no different from a 140kg whale
Who gets around on a mobility scooter
Sitting on his couch watching
State of origin football
Screaming abuse at players for dropping the ball

It's just laughable nonsense

Dnarever wrote on Apr 17^th, 2023 at 11:10am:

Jasin wrote on Apr 17th, 2023 at 10:02am: Elon Musk said what every Interneter has been wanting to say to the Big Brother Media: "Go F**k Yourself"  ;D ;D The Journalist would have had a seizure if it went on. Media can't cope with people out there that doesn't play by 'their' rules and narrative.  ;D ;D Yes Elton has been telling everyone in the world to do that for years. How does it help with anything? How did he do anything other than to waste everyone's time?

No. He told the Big Brother Media. He doesn't tell everyone in the world.

I thought it was a pretty good interview.

Both did well IMO.

Elon Musk was more persistent and in being persistent he managed to turn the interview around so the reporter was the one who was being interviewed. Incidentally that’s a strategy which many experienced businessmen often use if/when they’re challenged.

Musk is an oil secreted from a gland at the base of a deer's penis.

        https://i.postimg.cc/sx6YSRCk/Screenshot-2023-04-18-at-00-05-37-images-JPEG-Image-270-187-pixels.png


        What feelz you got about that Elon?     ;D

aquascoot wrote on Apr 17^th, 2023 at 11:29am:

That people like Carl actually have the audacity to think they are smarter than musk Who's achievements probably rival those of Albert Einstein

Where did I say that I thought I was smarter than Elon Musk?

Link please.

Actually, I didn't think you'd have time to be posting on here today.

Shouldn't you have been at the Post Office in Nowheresville, Outback Queensland (population: still 10) to ask them what's happened to my white flags?

I'm anticipating your failure to provide a link so please don't forget to wrap up another one to send to me. Thanks.  :)

aquascoot wrote on Apr 17^th, 2023 at 11:29am:

That people like Carl actually have the audacity to think they are smarter than musk Who's achievements probably rival those of Albert Einstein

I don't think Albert would have paid $43Billion for a company that may have been worth almost $10 Billion.

Elton not only is not in the same game as Albert but he is likely not in the top 100 million. (being generous there).

Lisa Jones wrote on Apr 17^th, 2023 at 1:25pm:

I thought it was a pretty good interview. Both did well IMO. Elon Musk was more persistent and in being persistent he managed to turn the interview around so the reporter was the one who was being interviewed. Incidentally that’s a strategy which many experienced businessmen often use if/when they’re challenged.

It is a strategy that only works when the person involved is amused enough to see where it goes. Used the strategy myself both with success and not.

Dnarever wrote on Apr 18^th, 2023 at 1:11am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Apr 17th, 2023 at 1:25pm: I thought it was a pretty good interview. Both did well IMO. Elon Musk was more persistent and in being persistent he managed to turn the interview around so the reporter was the one who was being interviewed. Incidentally that’s a strategy which many experienced businessmen often use if/when they’re challenged. It is a strategy that only works when the person involved is amused enough to see where it goes. Used the strategy myself both with success and not.

It works when there is a clear status or power differential, which in the Musk/Clayton case was a mountaintop vs a chasm.

It might work or fail in the case of two pissants facing off to see who can lift his arse higher to squirt acid further.

issuevoter wrote on Apr 16^th, 2023 at 1:49pm:

I'm a journalist

What are your thoughts on how journalists are handling the rise of alternative journalistic media?

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 18^th, 2023 at 7:31am:

Dnarever wrote on Apr 18th, 2023 at 1:11am: Lisa Jones wrote on Apr 17th, 2023 at 1:25pm: I thought it was a pretty good interview. Both did well IMO. Elon Musk was more persistent and in being persistent he managed to turn the interview around so the reporter was the one who was being interviewed. Incidentally that’s a strategy which many experienced businessmen often use if/when they’re challenged. It is a strategy that only works when the person involved is amused enough to see where it goes. Used the strategy myself both with success and not. It works when there is a clear status or power differential, which in the Musk/Clayton case was a mountaintop vs a chasm. It might work or fail in the case of two pissants facing off to see who can lift his arse higher to squirt acid further.

Yes but Musk was allowed to overcome the mountain.

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 18^th, 2023 at 7:31am:

Dnarever wrote on Apr 18th, 2023 at 1:11am: Lisa Jones wrote on Apr 17th, 2023 at 1:25pm: I thought it was a pretty good interview. Both did well IMO. Elon Musk was more persistent and in being persistent he managed to turn the interview around so the reporter was the one who was being interviewed. Incidentally that’s a strategy which many experienced businessmen often use if/when they’re challenged. It is a strategy that only works when the person involved is amused enough to see where it goes. Used the strategy myself both with success and not. It works when there is a clear status or power differential, which in the Musk/Clayton case was a mountaintop vs a chasm. It might work or fail in the case of two pissants facing off to see who can lift his arse higher to squirt acid further.

Quote:

It works when there is a clear status or power differential

The person with the power does not use this type of strategy, It is used by the person without power and works primarily when the person with power is amused by it enough to see how it goes. In this case it was just a narcissistic waste of time.

Dnarever wrote on Apr 18^th, 2023 at 7:02pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 18th, 2023 at 7:31am: Dnarever wrote on Apr 18th, 2023 at 1:11am: Lisa Jones wrote on Apr 17th, 2023 at 1:25pm: I thought it was a pretty good interview. Both did well IMO. Elon Musk was more persistent and in being persistent he managed to turn the interview around so the reporter was the one who was being interviewed. Incidentally that’s a strategy which many experienced businessmen often use if/when they’re challenged. It is a strategy that only works when the person involved is amused enough to see where it goes. Used the strategy myself both with success and not. It works when there is a clear status or power differential, which in the Musk/Clayton case was a mountaintop vs a chasm. It might work or fail in the case of two pissants facing off to see who can lift his arse higher to squirt acid further. Yes but Musk was allowed to overcome the mountain.

Was he now!

Born autistic with a prodigious intellect - as common a recipe for genius as, yep the old cliche, sliced bread.