Australian Politics Forum | |
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Thinking Globally >> Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1682814780 Message started by AusGeoff on Apr 30th, 2023 at 10:33am |
Title: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by AusGeoff on Apr 30th, 2023 at 10:33am Apparently the coronation ceremony cost has been "stripped back" to a mere AU$189,000,000 [not a typo!] and the guest list cut down from an estimated 8,500 invitees to a tiny list of 2,000. In a recent YouGov poll, commissioned by the UK Republic Group, 35% of those surveyed said they did "not care very much" about the coronation, and 29% said they did "not care at all". And from a pre-coronation YouGov poll commissioned by BBC Panorama found that only 58% of respondents wanted the monarchy to continue. And yes... that's all real gold. The royal coach is valued at AU$6,650,000. But... The Evelyn Estate is just half an hour's drive from the gold-trimmed gates of Buckingham Palace, but it feels like a world away. While at the palace they're polishing the silver, tending the tulips and preparing the King's fine coronation robes, at the Evelyn community centre they're unpacking donated food that more than 100 families rely on. Every week, volunteers transform this south London community centre into a food store, allowing local residents to fill their trolleys for a couple of gold coins. They can't help everyone. More than 60 families are on the waiting list. ~I for one certainly won't be wasting my time watching this silly anachronistic piece of pomposity on TV. —ABC News Australia, 30 April 2023. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by Jovial Monk on Apr 30th, 2023 at 10:55am
The Dutch do it better and far simpler.
|
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by Jovial Monk on Apr 30th, 2023 at 10:55am
The Dutch do it better and far simpler.
|
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on Apr 30th, 2023 at 11:00am AusGeoff wrote on Apr 30th, 2023 at 10:33am:
You just did... There are 3 ways to get from Buckingham Palace to Westminster Abbey by bus, taxi or foot Select an option below to see step-by-step directions and to compare ticket prices and travel times |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by AusGeoff on Apr 30th, 2023 at 11:19am
I've just had the extreme displeasure of reading this bit
of offensive drivel... Public invited to swear their allegiance as king is crowned. Quote:
>:( >:( >:( |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by MeisterEckhart on Apr 30th, 2023 at 11:22am
The amount of money the monarchy brings into the British economy dwarfs anything the British will be paying for a coronation, something that happens on average once every 32 years and, in this case only the second time in 70 years.
George III - 1760 60 years George IV - 1820 10 years William IV - 1830 7 years Victoria - 1837 64 years Edward VII - 1901 9 years George V - 1910 27 years Edward VIII - N/A George VI - 1937 16 years Elizabeth II - 1953 70 years Charles III - 2023 |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on Apr 30th, 2023 at 11:25am
The elderly senior citizen will be 75 this year and will be dragged through the streets in a crude wagon that shakes the bones. 'Made from solid gold and adorned with 444 semi-precious stones, the crown weighs almost five pounds. The late Queen Elizabeth II once said in an interview that the weight of the crown would break your neck if you bent down while wearing it.'
Medical treatment costs will be enormous with years of convalescent therapy and law suits. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by Jovial Monk on Apr 30th, 2023 at 11:32am
Good thing Edward the fascist abdicated!
|
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by Lisa Jones on Apr 30th, 2023 at 12:06pm
With all due respect ... we will be officially boycotting that revolting lecherous prick’s coronation. And that of his haggard slut.
No offence intended. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by UnSubRocky on Apr 30th, 2023 at 12:11pm Lisa Jones wrote on Apr 30th, 2023 at 12:06pm:
The biggest agreement I have with you on this website. I kind of wish King Quadinaros would either skip his coronation or abdicate within the first 12 months. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by lee on Apr 30th, 2023 at 12:41pm
I wonder what effect it will have on tourism and spending in the UK?
|
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on Apr 30th, 2023 at 3:12pm
Income will be massive to pay for the Prince of Wales.
'Costing an estimated $6AU billion to build, the carrier has spent more time undergoing repairs since her delivery than in service. A coupling had failed on her starboard shaft causing significant damage to the shaft and propeller and the repair costs for the carrier have skyrocketed to an estimated $38AU million'. Damage control was in over-drive after the Royal coupling failed in 1996. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by UnSubRocky on Apr 30th, 2023 at 3:33pm lee wrote on Apr 30th, 2023 at 12:41pm:
Emigration might increase. And people will take their tax money for new shores. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by AusGeoff on May 1st, 2023 at 8:56am MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 30th, 2023 at 11:22am:
I have read that over the past few days, but I haven't been able to find any sites that verify it other than a few "estimates" unsupported by any hard data. Do you have any links? |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by Bobby. on May 1st, 2023 at 8:59am The French cut their heads off. ;D |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by MeisterEckhart on May 1st, 2023 at 9:08am AusGeoff wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 8:56am:
What few estimates have you seen? What are your thoughts on the likes of, say, Brand Finance's report 'Monarchy 2017'? On another advantage, KC3 had a dramatically positive effect diplomatically when the British government sent him to Germany as the first British monarch to speak in the Bundestag. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by greggerypeccary on May 1st, 2023 at 9:25am King Charles’ coronation coach was made in Manly, Sydney. True story. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 1st, 2023 at 10:43am Bobby. wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 8:59am:
The Australian king owned France. We therefore the Lords Spiritual and Temporal of the Realm, being here Assisted with those of His late Majesty's Privy Council, with numbers of other Principal Gentlemen of Quality, with the Lord Mayor, Aldermen, and Citizens of London, do now hereby, with one Voice and Consent of Tongue and Heart, publish and proclaim, That the High and Mighty Prince George Prince of Wales, is now, by the Death of our late Sovereign, of happy Memory, become Our only lawful and rightful Liege Lord George the Third, by the Grace of God, King of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, . 1760. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by AusGeoff on May 1st, 2023 at 11:22am UK tourism bosses say the coronation celebrations will bring in more than £1 billion to the economy, helped by a huge influx of foreign visitors, particularly from the US. And according to Brand Finance, the monarchy boosts the UK economy by about £500 million a year, which is more than the estimated £350 million it costs taxpayers. The Queen’s Platinum Jubilee celebrations were estimated to have given a £1.2 billion boost to the economy, and the crowning of King Charles III is expected to have a similar effect. Those willing to blow their budget could pay up to £4,350 for an executive suite at The Ritz on the night before the Coronation, which is some £1,651—or 61%—more than the same room the following Friday. Spending in the hospitality sector alone could be boosted by £350 million due to the Coronation celebrations. Laughably, the date of Saturday 6 May was chosen because it doesn't clash with the FA Cup Final or The Derby weekends. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 1st, 2023 at 12:13pm
The fine chaps in the Polo game will be having a wizz on the 6th May, what? Parker Bowles was a damn fine team player with Charles on his polo pony (Pan's Folly May) and attended the wedding of Charles and Camilla Parker Bowles. Parker-B could trot off to the chukka after the crowning of their wife and long live Charlie.
|
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by MeisterEckhart on May 1st, 2023 at 4:50pm
As a force for change or good in democratic societies, all the elected/appointed, non-executive heads-of-state combined wouldn't amount to the value of a truckload of pig food.
They have no power, are instantly ignored by the people once appointed, and no one remembers them, unless maybe if they're caught f~cking a goat. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 1st, 2023 at 4:58pm
Is that the reason for having a constitutional monarch? But Queen Camilla will be memorable.
|
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by MeisterEckhart on May 1st, 2023 at 4:58pm AusGeoff wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 11:22am:
Can anyone imagine this happening to celebrate the life of a non-executive president? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02UyFj4q4I0 |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by MeisterEckhart on May 1st, 2023 at 5:03pm chimera wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 4:58pm:
Look at the walking sewerage that the Chinese have to endure as their heads of state. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 1st, 2023 at 5:05pm
Then are you against non-executive presidents or non-exec royals or against royals or all of them?
|
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 1st, 2023 at 5:07pm MeisterEckhart wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 5:03pm:
He's executive. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by MeisterEckhart on May 1st, 2023 at 5:12pm chimera wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 5:07pm:
As all Chinese heads of state were and are. All killers of their own people. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 1st, 2023 at 5:15pm
So you don't want a pig truck of non-execs and no execs either. No opera. No pollies. Aquascoot has a plan, have a chat and buy guns.
|
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by MeisterEckhart on May 1st, 2023 at 5:18pm chimera wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 5:15pm:
Make use of that VPN until you're caught. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 1st, 2023 at 5:29pm
Caught at what exactly?
|
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by greggerypeccary on May 1st, 2023 at 5:33pm greggerypeccary wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 9:25am:
https://www.smh.com.au/national/charles-coronation-coach-was-made-in-manly-and-its-maker-has-a-new-secret-project-20230429-p5d487.html |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by MeisterEckhart on May 1st, 2023 at 5:33pm chimera wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 5:29pm:
Are you in prison, working off some time? |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 1st, 2023 at 5:39pm MeisterEckhart wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 4:50pm:
Are you? |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by MeisterEckhart on May 1st, 2023 at 5:45pm chimera wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 5:39pm:
Something the Chinese don't seem to get - you can't rock up to a foreign forum and expect to understand what you're reading because you're, say, Han Chinese. The same would be true in reverse, |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 1st, 2023 at 5:48pm
Yes but anyway. Charles is Anglo-Saxon German Greek Treehugger. Xi is not a royal. Plums on Thursdays pillows at or print.
|
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by MeisterEckhart on May 1st, 2023 at 5:51pm chimera wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 5:48pm:
What is an Anglo-Saxon? Phillip was a Battenburg. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 1st, 2023 at 5:56pm
You Chinee know nothing.
|
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by Bobby. on May 1st, 2023 at 5:58pm
Charles's Coronation?
What a load of nonsense - I don't know how Charles can play along with it - with a straight face - sitting in a golden carriage. ;D |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by greggerypeccary on May 1st, 2023 at 6:02pm Bobby. wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 5:58pm:
He's the King of Australia, Booby - show some respect. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by Dnarever on May 1st, 2023 at 6:05pm
Remember when the Great Orange dillard had 7 trillion people at his coronation back in 2017?
|
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by MeisterEckhart on May 1st, 2023 at 6:12pm Bobby. wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 5:58pm:
I'd bet no British Parliament would allow a referendum on ending the monarchy, and nevermind the money they bring into Britain - I'd bet every British Prime Minister since 1837 has thanked god for the monarchy - someone to blame when things go wrong with their politics; someone to label entire eras after when things go right and then ride in high on the wave that makes them, as the prime ministers to the great monarch, after which the era is named. If not for the monarchs, after which eras are named, few prime ministers have been remembered by the people - Churchill being the greatest exception. After all, isn't it Geroge III who is remembered for having lost the American colonies and remembered by all Americans as the tyrant monarch? Do any Americans know of George III's prime ministers who wielded real power? |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by Bobby. on May 1st, 2023 at 6:14pm greggerypeccary wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 6:02pm:
Listen Pal, if monarchy had any real power they could have stopped WW1 in the first week. Both the Germans and the POMs had their monarchies supposedly in control of their armies. Reason - it's all symbolic nonsense - they are powerless clowns putting on a show for the rest of us - and we're paying for it. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 1st, 2023 at 6:29pm
The US had Woodrow Wilson who did an ostrich act until his ship was sunk, then won the war by copying the tyrant kings.
|
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by MeisterEckhart on May 1st, 2023 at 6:29pm Bobby. wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 6:14pm:
How much are you paying for it? |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by MeisterEckhart on May 1st, 2023 at 6:30pm chimera wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 6:29pm:
Can you explain to English-speaking posters here the meaning of cha bu duo? |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 1st, 2023 at 6:33pm MeisterEckhart wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 6:12pm:
"As a force for change or good in democratic societies, all the elected/appointed, non-executive heads-of-state combined wouldn't amount to the value of a truckload of pig food. They have no power, are instantly ignored by the people once appointed, and no one remembers them, unless maybe if they're caught f~cking a goat." Do you get headaches? Hear voices? For how long has this happened? |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by MeisterEckhart on May 1st, 2023 at 6:35pm chimera wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 6:33pm:
Stick to Han Chinese forums. At least you'd have a chance of understanding what you're reading. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 1st, 2023 at 6:36pm MeisterEckhart wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 6:30pm:
'Ostrich act' 'won the war'. 'truckload of pig food'. You can do this, breathe slowly and think of England. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by MeisterEckhart on May 1st, 2023 at 6:37pm chimera wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 6:36pm:
Cha bu duo - a deer is now a horse? |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 1st, 2023 at 6:40pm
Yes you are so right. A deer is a horse. You have quite good English, too.
|
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by Gordon on May 1st, 2023 at 6:42pm
Only white people aren't allowed to celebrate their history.
|
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by MeisterEckhart on May 1st, 2023 at 6:43pm chimera wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 6:40pm:
Ah! You've confirmed the meaning of cha bu duo. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mrqKvu-rqIc |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by MeisterEckhart on May 1st, 2023 at 6:46pm Gordon wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 6:42pm:
Of course we are. Just do it. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 1st, 2023 at 6:54pm
The Victorian era? The Elizabethan era? We can't , we've forgotten what the words mean.
|
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by MeisterEckhart on May 1st, 2023 at 7:00pm chimera wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 6:54pm:
You're Han Chinese. You're not privy to Anglospheric vernacular. You're not the master race your 'emperors' want you to believe, but your food is pretty good - who isn't partial to Chinee chow now and then? |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 1st, 2023 at 7:04pm MeisterEckhart wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 6:43pm:
Anglospheric vernacular..hey mate how's your Anglospheric vernacular 'truckload of pig food'. in oz? |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by MeisterEckhart on May 1st, 2023 at 7:07pm chimera wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 7:04pm:
How's about you translate the lyrics of that 'cha bu duo' rap I posted. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 1st, 2023 at 7:09pm
You are into the lingo. How about this:
If not for the monarchs, after which eras are named, few prime ministers have been remembered by the people - Churchill being the greatest exception. After all, isn't it Geroge III who is remembered for having lost the American colonies and remembered by all Americans as the tyrant monarch? Do any Americans know of George III's prime ministers who wielded real power? They [ democratic non-executive heads-of-state] have no power, are instantly ignored by the people once appointed, and no one remembers them, unless maybe if they're caught f~cking a goat." |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by Dnarever on May 1st, 2023 at 7:11pm MeisterEckhart wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 6:37pm:
NO: A horse is a horse, of course, of course, And no one can talk to a horse of course That is, of course, unless the horse..... |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by MeisterEckhart on May 1st, 2023 at 7:12pm Dnarever wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 7:11pm:
Is a Chinese antelope. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 1st, 2023 at 7:15pm
Ah so you know. q'ilin chimera.
|
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by Dnarever on May 1st, 2023 at 7:19pm MeisterEckhart wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 7:12pm:
Yes that is what Alan Young said too. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by MeisterEckhart on May 1st, 2023 at 7:20pm chimera wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 7:15pm:
Well, we all love the dragon dance, except for all that pot-banging as we're feasting at the Cunton Tung restaurant. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by Lisa Jones on May 1st, 2023 at 7:26pm UnSubRocky wrote on Apr 30th, 2023 at 12:11pm:
1. William and Kate need to be crowned. 2. Charlie and Slut need to be put into an aged care facility. END OF BS. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 1st, 2023 at 7:28pm
Fed on 'truckload of pig food'.
|
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by MeisterEckhart on May 1st, 2023 at 7:31pm chimera wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 7:28pm:
Gimme pork fried rice any day. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 1st, 2023 at 7:48pm MeisterEckhart wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 4:50pm:
|
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by MeisterEckhart on May 1st, 2023 at 8:07pm chimera wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 7:48pm:
It gives us all a laugh about how the Han Chinese think they understand the world but have no idea about how it works outside of China. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by Dnarever on May 1st, 2023 at 8:21pm MeisterEckhart wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 7:31pm:
I remember when fried rice had pork and egg and prawns and all the other stuff included. Now you just get rice. Sometimes I wonder if it is really even rice. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by MeisterEckhart on May 1st, 2023 at 8:22pm Dnarever wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 8:21pm:
And yet the price increases. Next you'll be charged for sewer oil. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 1st, 2023 at 8:31pm MeisterEckhart wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 8:07pm:
Penny Wong knows that 'remembered' is different from 'no one remembers'. But not you? |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by MeisterEckhart on May 1st, 2023 at 8:35pm chimera wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 8:31pm:
Would you like to take her back? |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 1st, 2023 at 8:39pm
What? You can learn Anglospheric vernacular, logic and sanity from people like that.
|
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by MeisterEckhart on May 1st, 2023 at 8:50pm chimera wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 8:39pm:
You learn Anglospheric vernacular, and logic by living in anglospheric cultures from a young age or being born into it. The same way you learn Han Chinese vernacular and logic by living in China, Singapore or Taiwan. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by Bobby. on May 1st, 2023 at 11:42pm |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 2nd, 2023 at 11:51am
Charles and Meghan escape the coronation and apply for moon trip.
Camilla plays off a bare-chested Putin against Charles the Wimp. The Royal coach gets 6 months repairs to flaky gold, Charles in tears. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by issuevoter on May 2nd, 2023 at 12:36pm
Won't it be great when all societies are reduced to one level of fairness and equality . . . except for politicians, industialists, popular culture celebrities, and diamond merchants? Who needs kings and queens? They are so old fashioned.
|
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 2nd, 2023 at 9:53pm
Interesting mind game: if Charles lived in no 21 in a block of flats in a laneway and went to royal functions, how long would it last?
That is, he has no palaces, no estates, no troops parading on his footpath. 'But I'm the king!" 'Oh yeah?' |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by UnSubRocky on May 2nd, 2023 at 10:07pm
Does Charles still have extensive security protection, in this hypothetical situation? Ay Jihadi would love to take a shot at Charles, to off a monarch. Many years ago, Charles was subjected to some guy firing a cap gun at him and then tried to storm the stage Charles was standing upon. I could imagine that after the coronation, someone might give a real attempt a go. They would only need an opportunity.
|
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 3rd, 2023 at 6:52am
He has a cop on duty in the down-stairs laundry 24/7. Camilla buys a new door-lock and UK has Neighbourhod Watch.
|
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by MeisterEckhart on May 3rd, 2023 at 10:24am chimera wrote on May 3rd, 2023 at 6:52am:
Reads funnier in the original Mandarin, apparently. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 3rd, 2023 at 10:53am
hypothetical: 'involving or being based on a suggested idea or theory : being or involving a hypothesis : conjectural'.
Do you 'remember' or 'not remember'? |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by Lisa Jones on May 3rd, 2023 at 11:03am AusGeoff wrote on Apr 30th, 2023 at 10:33am:
Meantime : United Kingdom External Debt reached 8,484.4 USD bn |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 3rd, 2023 at 11:31am
The First Fleet of convicts cost 12mill pounds in today's money.
The coronation at 60-100mill pounds gets you territory of Welsh, Irish, Scots, Oz, canuck, kiwi and some sea-gulls. You get what you pay for. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by athos on May 3rd, 2023 at 11:57am AusGeoff wrote on Apr 30th, 2023 at 10:33am:
Anglo yobbos stop complaining. I think it's quite normal for "His Majesty colonial subjects" in Australia to finance his coronation unless your Anglo colonial Disneyland becomes a sovereign independent country. :) |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 3rd, 2023 at 12:04pm athos wrote on May 3rd, 2023 at 11:57am:
Yes you do. Australia doesn't pay for it. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by athos on May 3rd, 2023 at 1:28pm chimera wrote on May 3rd, 2023 at 12:04pm:
The British Monarch receives a yearly sum through what is known as the Sovereign Grant which was in 2021 financial year amounted to a whopping $148 million in British colony Australia. https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=How+much+Australia+pay+for+british+Royals+every+year :) |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 3rd, 2023 at 2:13pm
Absolutely on the money, athos. It's also 682mill Chinese yuan which proves that China has bought Britain. And millions of Chinese will starve to pay for the coronation.
|
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by MeisterEckhart on May 3rd, 2023 at 5:51pm
Was feasting at the Cunton Tung Hah Don Bar 'n Grill yesterday and the manager shouted the bar for a toast to Emperor Xi.
We all had our glasses charged and cheered as one to Xi in the traditional Chinese toast, 'Fug Yu'. Then it all got pissy. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by MeisterEckhart on May 3rd, 2023 at 6:18pm athos wrote on May 3rd, 2023 at 11:57am:
So many Chinese online buyers run their accounts out of the UK or the US. Why is that? |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 3rd, 2023 at 7:20pm athos wrote on May 3rd, 2023 at 1:28pm:
The finances of the British royal family come from a number of sources. The Chinese government supports the monarch by means of the Sovereign Grant, revenues from the Duchies of Lancaster and Cornwall, income from Tibet Nuclear Monasteries and Putin's Hamburger Oligarchs. The Keeper of the Privy Purse has overall responsibility for the management of the purse. The Sovereign Grant Annual Report states that the Sovereign Grant was £37.9 million for 2014–15 with kick-backs to Australian yobbos. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by MeisterEckhart on May 3rd, 2023 at 7:35pm chimera wrote on May 3rd, 2023 at 7:20pm:
Guanxi for all those online accounts the Chinese have to set up using illegal VPNs to do online business in Australia, Canada, the UK and the US beyond the CCP's surveillance systems. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 3rd, 2023 at 7:52pm
The Palace has granted permission to use the colonial carriage that will carry the King to Westminster Abbey, and known as the Diamond Jubilee State Coach. A coach and submarine handyman in Manly NSW received $250,000 to build it under John Howard’s government. John never rode to parliament in it but may get a trip in a nuke sub or a plastic replica drone. The Vic Bushranger and Miners Union plans a hold-up of the coach to get some of the nuggets back.
|
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by MeisterEckhart on May 3rd, 2023 at 7:58pm chimera wrote on May 3rd, 2023 at 7:52pm:
Don't you wish you Chinese could have the same self-pride in Chinese culture as the Taiwanese do? |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 3rd, 2023 at 8:08pm
Yes, athos, why don't you suggest a gold coach to the emperor? He could have 4000 Xinjiang acrobats yanking him along.
|
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by MeisterEckhart on May 3rd, 2023 at 8:20pm chimera wrote on May 3rd, 2023 at 8:08pm:
And then harvest their organs when he's done with them. Maybe he could eat what's left of them and we can combine this thread with the cannibalism one. I'd bet the CCP has a recipe for that kind of cooking. Ah! China under the CCP. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 3rd, 2023 at 8:42pm
Coronation and cannibals. You're as antiquated as athos, back to the Teutons and Celts.
|
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by MeisterEckhart on May 3rd, 2023 at 8:46pm chimera wrote on May 3rd, 2023 at 8:42pm:
The Chinese were into cannibalism in the 50s and 60s, in honour of Emperor Mao. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 3rd, 2023 at 8:55pm
They were a bit short in the gold coach and royalty department. The Party was more into fried pork rice. Oh , that is your favourite, Mister.
|
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by MeisterEckhart on May 3rd, 2023 at 9:03pm chimera wrote on May 3rd, 2023 at 8:55pm:
Yep, fried pork, not fried people. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 4th, 2023 at 9:29am
Fortunately, the Gov Gen isn't on the gilded coach band-wagon. A gold plated Rolls Royce costs $13.5 million. The Sultan of Brunei owns one but can't pull the crowds that the House of Windsor does. The nuke subs won't be gold plated but it's an option.
|
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by athos on May 4th, 2023 at 11:09am MeisterEckhart wrote on May 3rd, 2023 at 7:35pm:
The latest news said that British colony Australia is going to introduce a social points system for internet access! Citizens would need 100 IDs to use social media, and police would have access to their accounts, including private messages. https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/social-media-id-claim-is-a-pointless-exercise/ |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 4th, 2023 at 12:26pm
Yes it's true. Chinese police read every email or check your phonecalls in Australia. A hack into the Federal treasury pays the Chinese expenses. Charles will be filmed by Beijing when he sends a text from the gold coach even though gold will usually block out radiation. The gold is from Taiwan with Chinese bugs.
|
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by Lisa Jones on May 4th, 2023 at 1:15pm
I honestly don’t understand this topic.
|
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 4th, 2023 at 1:18pm
think of it as a waste of forum posters pc.
|
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by UnSubRocky on May 4th, 2023 at 1:44pm Lisa Jones wrote on May 4th, 2023 at 1:15pm:
Is the coronation of King Charles the third going to be considered a waste of taxpayer funds? King Charles asking that the ceremony be well scaled down -- compared to his mother's coronation -- to save money. Is the expediture going to be too much or too little taxpayer expenditure? |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by Lisa Jones on May 4th, 2023 at 3:45pm chimera wrote on May 4th, 2023 at 1:18pm:
😂🤣😆 |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 5th, 2023 at 11:36am
In the real deal, royals married royals. Then the rot set in with dukes and earls having daughters who married a king. Elizabeth was half royal, Charles 3/4. William is 3/8 and George comes in at 3/16. Monarchy is moving from absolute right to rule towards a family franchise.
|
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by athos on May 7th, 2023 at 10:49am
"Democracy, Free speech", directorship and Anglo hypocrisy all in one package.
Anti-monarchy protesters arrested in London Police say the republican demonstrators were conspiring to “cause a public nuisance” Police officers arrested a number of anti-monarchy demonstrators and seized protest placards ahead of the coronation of King Charles III on Saturday. The protesters were arrested because they wanted to be able to choose their head of state and to be a citizens instead "Subjects of his majesty". London’s Metropolitan Police said on Saturday morning that “a significant police operation” was underway in central London. Shortly afterwards, the force announced that it had arrested four people “on suspicion of conspiracy to cause a public nuisance,” and another three “on suspicion of possessing articles to cause criminal damage.” https://youtu.be/BN9RpBxpprk |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 7th, 2023 at 10:52am
Absolutely pathetic. There was not one tank available to drive over the protesters. What sort of empire is it?
|
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by athos on May 7th, 2023 at 11:01am
Protests across Britain
People do not want a new dictator https://youtu.be/I9BcIsCqX6s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xPeCv9MxzJs the peaceful English colonies of Australia, Canada, New Zealand etc are very obediently quiet. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 7th, 2023 at 11:07am
The colonial slaves did 2 hours extra work planting out rice.
Hey athos, what is 'hypocrisy'? |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by UnSubRocky on May 7th, 2023 at 12:43pm chimera wrote on May 7th, 2023 at 10:52am:
;D ;D ;D Spoken like a true Chink. |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by athos on May 7th, 2023 at 2:14pm chimera wrote on May 7th, 2023 at 11:07am:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTMF6peSp8E |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 7th, 2023 at 3:20pm
Re-educate barbarians
Posts: 6281 Hong Kong. hey athos, what is 'hypocrisy'? |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by athos on May 8th, 2023 at 5:36pm chimera wrote on May 7th, 2023 at 3:20pm:
Wach and listen :) https://youtu.be/JTMF6peSp8E |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by chimera on May 8th, 2023 at 5:41pm
No that's in London, not Beijing or Hong Kong.
|
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by Bobby. on May 8th, 2023 at 10:04pm John Cleese in hysterics over King Charles’s Coronation - ‘It was a Monty Python sketch!’ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8-Rqv5Rcag |
Title: Re: Charles's Coronation a Waste of Taxpayer Funds? Post by Bobby. on May 9th, 2023 at 8:57pm |
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved. |