;D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hcannz2iAjc

11min mark and a bunch of angry workers put it nicely to the demonstrating Lefties blocking their road way.
"Can't you think of a better way to Protest?!"

...and that kinda sums it all up.

LOL... former(?) Muslim, and conservative Trump
supporter/Biden hater Rita Panahi holds a strange
set of often incompatible viewpoints, sometimes
apparently even strongly self-contradictory.  It's of
no surprise that she works at Murdoch's loony right
wing FOX news.

Anybody who condemns or praises somebody's
activities of the day based solely on their left- or
right-wing bias has an overly simplistic understanding
of human nature and people themselves, and should
probably keep their mouths shut.

Panahi is actually very difficult to watch, with her high
pitched, whining, nasal vocalisations.  In fact she should
probably not be employed as a TV presenter.

At any rate, her opinions can safely be ignored.    ::)

So it was ok for the Lefties to shout out all the Right-wing 'KARENS' going off regarding COVID?
Even though the Karen people of around the Cambodia region were a bit offended.
Which shows your complete hypocrisy and the Left's inability to come up with something original.

SUCK IT UP GEOFF - BECAUSE ITS BEEN A 'RIGHT BACK AT YA'!!! EFFECT.

Jasin wrote on Sep 25^th, 2023 at 8:37am:

So it was ok for the Lefties to shout out all the Right-wing 'KARENS' going off regarding COVID? Even though the Karen people of around the Cambodia region were a bit offended. Which shows your complete hypocrisy and the Left's inability to come up with something original. SUCK IT UP GEOFF - BECAUSE ITS BEEN A 'RIGHT BACK AT YA'!!! EFFECT.

Lost.

AusGeoff wrote on Sep 25^th, 2023 at 3:26am:

LOL... former(?) Muslim, and conservative Trump supporter/Biden hater Rita Panahi holds a strange set of often incompatible viewpoints, sometimes apparently even strongly self-contradictory.  It's of no surprise that she works at Murdoch's loony right wing FOX news.

;D ;D ;D ;D


Oh, the put-downs!!  "Biden hater". Trump supporter!!  "Former(?)" "Incomprehensible, looney right", "Murdoch Fox" self contradictory  -  go on Sage of outer Gippsland, do the Bbwianesque tsk, tsk  and  ::) ::) ::)


Pile on the silly invective - so you don't have to actually refute any of the points, counter any of the arguments. Just do the lefty verbal melt-down, the verbose put-downs and hope that nobody will notice that you have refuted nothing.

Frank wrote on Sep 25^th, 2023 at 9:12am:

AusGeoff wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 3:26am: LOL... former(?) Muslim, and conservative Trump supporter/Biden hater Rita Panahi holds a strange set of often incompatible viewpoints, sometimes apparently even strongly self-contradictory.  It's of no surprise that she works at Murdoch's loony right wing FOX news. ;D ;D ;D ;D Oh, the put-downs!!  "Biden hater". Trump supporter!!  "Former(?)" "Incomprehensible, looney right", "Murdoch Fox" self contradictory  -  go on Sage of outer Gippsland, do the Bbwianesque tsk, tsk  and  ::) ::) ::) Pile on the silly invective - so you don't have to actually refute any of the points, counter any of the arguments. Just do the lefty verbal melt-down, the verbose put-downs and hope that nobody will notice that you have refuted nothing.

Says Frank, doing precisely that ... just with more commas than is decent.

mothra wrote on Sep 25^th, 2023 at 9:27am:

Frank wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 9:12am: AusGeoff wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 3:26am: LOL... former(?) Muslim, and conservative Trump supporter/Biden hater Rita Panahi holds a strange set of often incompatible viewpoints, sometimes apparently even strongly self-contradictory.  It's of no surprise that she works at Murdoch's loony right wing FOX news. ;D ;D ;D ;D Oh, the put-downs!!  "Biden hater". Trump supporter!!  "Former(?)" "Incomprehensible, looney right", "Murdoch Fox" self contradictory  -  go on Sage of outer Gippsland, do the Bbwianesque tsk, tsk  and  ::) ::) ::) Pile on the silly invective - so you don't have to actually refute any of the points, counter any of the arguments. Just do the lefty verbal melt-down, the verbose put-downs and hope that nobody will notice that you have refuted nothing. Says Frank, doing precisely that ... just with more commas than is decent.

I take Panahi's point, you and Guff don't. Without saying where she goes wrong, you dismiss it all as not worth disputing. But the fact is, you are unable or too lazy to dispute it, so you deploy the usual lefty invective, hoping that nobody will notice that you are, in fact, too lazy or not up to disputing what is said.


Why are Yes activist shouting abuse? Not a difficult question. But to dismiss it as just a Murdoch Fox righ wing question from  Biden hating Trump supporter is  predictably lazy and stupid lefty reaction.

Frank wrote on Sep 25^th, 2023 at 10:02am:

mothra wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 9:27am: Frank wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 9:12am: AusGeoff wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 3:26am: LOL... former(?) Muslim, and conservative Trump supporter/Biden hater Rita Panahi holds a strange set of often incompatible viewpoints, sometimes apparently even strongly self-contradictory.  It's of no surprise that she works at Murdoch's loony right wing FOX news. ;D ;D ;D ;D Oh, the put-downs!!  "Biden hater". Trump supporter!!  "Former(?)" "Incomprehensible, looney right", "Murdoch Fox" self contradictory  -  go on Sage of outer Gippsland, do the Bbwianesque tsk, tsk  and  ::) ::) ::) Pile on the silly invective - so you don't have to actually refute any of the points, counter any of the arguments. Just do the lefty verbal melt-down, the verbose put-downs and hope that nobody will notice that you have refuted nothing. Says Frank, doing precisely that ... just with more commas than is decent. I take Panahi's point, you and Guff don't. Without saying where she goes wrong, you dismiss it all as not worth disputing. But the fact is, you are unable or too lazy to dispute it, so you deploy the usual lefty invective, hoping that nobody will notice that you are, in fact, too lazy or not up to disputing what is said. Why are Yes activist shouting abuse? Not a difficult question. But to dismiss it as just a Murdoch Fox righ wing question from  Biden hating Trump supporter is  predictably lazy and stupid lefty reaction.

What's to dispute? She's reducing all opinions contrary to hers to absolute ridicule by hyper focussing on the most extreme elements with her critiques thereby avoiding the requirement to address anything other than the extreme.

Rupert 101.

Still works on the older folk. The younger are savvier.

mothra wrote on Sep 25^th, 2023 at 10:15am:

Frank wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 10:02am: mothra wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 9:27am: Frank wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 9:12am: AusGeoff wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 3:26am: LOL... former(?) Muslim, and conservative Trump supporter/Biden hater Rita Panahi holds a strange set of often incompatible viewpoints, sometimes apparently even strongly self-contradictory.  It's of no surprise that she works at Murdoch's loony right wing FOX news. ;D ;D ;D ;D Oh, the put-downs!!  "Biden hater". Trump supporter!!  "Former(?)" "Incomprehensible, looney right", "Murdoch Fox" self contradictory  -  go on Sage of outer Gippsland, do the Bbwianesque tsk, tsk  and  ::) ::) ::) Pile on the silly invective - so you don't have to actually refute any of the points, counter any of the arguments. Just do the lefty verbal melt-down, the verbose put-downs and hope that nobody will notice that you have refuted nothing. Says Frank, doing precisely that ... just with more commas than is decent. I take Panahi's point, you and Guff don't. Without saying where she goes wrong, you dismiss it all as not worth disputing. But the fact is, you are unable or too lazy to dispute it, so you deploy the usual lefty invective, hoping that nobody will notice that you are, in fact, too lazy or not up to disputing what is said. Why are Yes activist shouting abuse? Not a difficult question. But to dismiss it as just a Murdoch Fox righ wing question from  Biden hating Trump supporter is  predictably lazy and stupid lefty reaction. What's to dispute? She's reducing all opinions contrary to hers to absolute ridicule by hyper focussing on the most extreme elements with her critiques thereby avoiding the requirement to address anything other than the extreme. Rupert 101. Still works on the older folk. The younger are savvier.

What is it she is AVOIDING to address?

Why are Yes voters shouting abuse? Why does Langton call everyone voting no either a racist or stupid or both? 

Why do you avoid addressing such simple points and hide behind 'Murdoch Fox right wing' bluster?

Frank wrote on Sep 25^th, 2023 at 10:30am:

mothra wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 10:15am: Frank wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 10:02am: mothra wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 9:27am: Frank wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 9:12am: AusGeoff wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 3:26am: LOL... former(?) Muslim, and conservative Trump supporter/Biden hater Rita Panahi holds a strange set of often incompatible viewpoints, sometimes apparently even strongly self-contradictory.  It's of no surprise that she works at Murdoch's loony right wing FOX news. ;D ;D ;D ;D Oh, the put-downs!!  "Biden hater". Trump supporter!!  "Former(?)" "Incomprehensible, looney right", "Murdoch Fox" self contradictory  -  go on Sage of outer Gippsland, do the Bbwianesque tsk, tsk  and  ::) ::) ::) Pile on the silly invective - so you don't have to actually refute any of the points, counter any of the arguments. Just do the lefty verbal melt-down, the verbose put-downs and hope that nobody will notice that you have refuted nothing. Says Frank, doing precisely that ... just with more commas than is decent. I take Panahi's point, you and Guff don't. Without saying where she goes wrong, you dismiss it all as not worth disputing. But the fact is, you are unable or too lazy to dispute it, so you deploy the usual lefty invective, hoping that nobody will notice that you are, in fact, too lazy or not up to disputing what is said. Why are Yes activist shouting abuse? Not a difficult question. But to dismiss it as just a Murdoch Fox righ wing question from  Biden hating Trump supporter is  predictably lazy and stupid lefty reaction. What's to dispute? She's reducing all opinions contrary to hers to absolute ridicule by hyper focussing on the most extreme elements with her critiques thereby avoiding the requirement to address anything other than the extreme. Rupert 101. Still works on the older folk. The younger are savvier. What is it she is AVOIDING to address?

On which particular issue, fruitbat? She's waxing hysterical on all the ones she's raised.

Would you like to break them down?

Shoot.

mothra wrote on Sep 25^th, 2023 at 10:32am:

Frank wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 10:30am: mothra wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 10:15am: Frank wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 10:02am: mothra wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 9:27am: Frank wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 9:12am: AusGeoff wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 3:26am: LOL... former(?) Muslim, and conservative Trump supporter/Biden hater Rita Panahi holds a strange set of often incompatible viewpoints, sometimes apparently even strongly self-contradictory.  It's of no surprise that she works at Murdoch's loony right wing FOX news. ;D ;D ;D ;D Oh, the put-downs!!  "Biden hater". Trump supporter!!  "Former(?)" "Incomprehensible, looney right", "Murdoch Fox" self contradictory  -  go on Sage of outer Gippsland, do the Bbwianesque tsk, tsk  and  ::) ::) ::) Pile on the silly invective - so you don't have to actually refute any of the points, counter any of the arguments. Just do the lefty verbal melt-down, the verbose put-downs and hope that nobody will notice that you have refuted nothing. Says Frank, doing precisely that ... just with more commas than is decent. I take Panahi's point, you and Guff don't. Without saying where she goes wrong, you dismiss it all as not worth disputing. But the fact is, you are unable or too lazy to dispute it, so you deploy the usual lefty invective, hoping that nobody will notice that you are, in fact, too lazy or not up to disputing what is said. Why are Yes activist shouting abuse? Not a difficult question. But to dismiss it as just a Murdoch Fox righ wing question from  Biden hating Trump supporter is  predictably lazy and stupid lefty reaction. What's to dispute? She's reducing all opinions contrary to hers to absolute ridicule by hyper focussing on the most extreme elements with her critiques thereby avoiding the requirement to address anything other than the extreme. Rupert 101. Still works on the older folk. The younger are savvier. What is it she is AVOIDING to address? On which particular issue, fruitbat? She's waxing hysterical on all the ones she's raised. Would you like to break them down? Shoot.

I asked you already and you ignored it.

What is it she is AVOIDING to address?  Why are Yes voters shouting abuse? Why does Langton call everyone voting no either a racist or stupid or both? Why does she call Price and her mother 'coloured help''?

Why do you avoid addressing such simple points and hide behind 'Murdoch Fox right wing' bluster?


The broader point of it all is that lefty identitarians around race, gender, climate, are on emotional edge, liable to flip in the face of disagreement. The OP clip goes for 12 minutes and mentions a number of Emotionally Correct lefty issues and melf-downs.

Your response and Guff's are just the local version of that global phenomenon: the blustering, pc/woke wowser and po-faced pwogwessive morality police.

Frank wrote on Sep 25^th, 2023 at 10:45am:

mothra wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 10:32am: Frank wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 10:30am: mothra wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 10:15am: Frank wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 10:02am: mothra wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 9:27am: Frank wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 9:12am: AusGeoff wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 3:26am: LOL... former(?) Muslim, and conservative Trump supporter/Biden hater Rita Panahi holds a strange set of often incompatible viewpoints, sometimes apparently even strongly self-contradictory.  It's of no surprise that she works at Murdoch's loony right wing FOX news. ;D ;D ;D ;D Oh, the put-downs!!  "Biden hater". Trump supporter!!  "Former(?)" "Incomprehensible, looney right", "Murdoch Fox" self contradictory  -  go on Sage of outer Gippsland, do the Bbwianesque tsk, tsk  and  ::) ::) ::) Pile on the silly invective - so you don't have to actually refute any of the points, counter any of the arguments. Just do the lefty verbal melt-down, the verbose put-downs and hope that nobody will notice that you have refuted nothing. Says Frank, doing precisely that ... just with more commas than is decent. I take Panahi's point, you and Guff don't. Without saying where she goes wrong, you dismiss it all as not worth disputing. But the fact is, you are unable or too lazy to dispute it, so you deploy the usual lefty invective, hoping that nobody will notice that you are, in fact, too lazy or not up to disputing what is said. Why are Yes activist shouting abuse? Not a difficult question. But to dismiss it as just a Murdoch Fox righ wing question from  Biden hating Trump supporter is  predictably lazy and stupid lefty reaction. What's to dispute? She's reducing all opinions contrary to hers to absolute ridicule by hyper focussing on the most extreme elements with her critiques thereby avoiding the requirement to address anything other than the extreme. Rupert 101. Still works on the older folk. The younger are savvier. What is it she is AVOIDING to address? On which particular issue, fruitbat? She's waxing hysterical on all the ones she's raised. Would you like to break them down? Shoot. I asked you already and you ignored it. What is it she is AVOIDING to address?  Why are Yes voters shouting abuse? Why does Langton call everyone voting no either a racist or stupid or both? Why does she call Price and her mother 'coloured help''? Why do you avoid addressing such simple points and hide behind 'Murdoch Fox right wing' bluster? The broader point of it all is that lefty identitarians around race, gender, climate, are on emotional edge, liable to flip in the face of disagreement. The OP clip goes for 12 minutes and mentions a number of Emotionally Correct lefty issues and melf-downs. Your response and Guff's are just the local version of that global phenomenon: the blustering, pc/woke wowser and po-faced pwogwessive morality police.

Yeah, pretty sure all of that is lies.

mothra wrote on Sep 25^th, 2023 at 10:46am:

Frank wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 10:45am: mothra wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 10:32am: Frank wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 10:30am: mothra wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 10:15am: Frank wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 10:02am: mothra wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 9:27am: Frank wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 9:12am: AusGeoff wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 3:26am: LOL... former(?) Muslim, and conservative Trump supporter/Biden hater Rita Panahi holds a strange set of often incompatible viewpoints, sometimes apparently even strongly self-contradictory.  It's of no surprise that she works at Murdoch's loony right wing FOX news. ;D ;D ;D ;D Oh, the put-downs!!  "Biden hater". Trump supporter!!  "Former(?)" "Incomprehensible, looney right", "Murdoch Fox" self contradictory  -  go on Sage of outer Gippsland, do the Bbwianesque tsk, tsk  and  ::) ::) ::) Pile on the silly invective - so you don't have to actually refute any of the points, counter any of the arguments. Just do the lefty verbal melt-down, the verbose put-downs and hope that nobody will notice that you have refuted nothing. Says Frank, doing precisely that ... just with more commas than is decent. I take Panahi's point, you and Guff don't. Without saying where she goes wrong, you dismiss it all as not worth disputing. But the fact is, you are unable or too lazy to dispute it, so you deploy the usual lefty invective, hoping that nobody will notice that you are, in fact, too lazy or not up to disputing what is said. Why are Yes activist shouting abuse? Not a difficult question. But to dismiss it as just a Murdoch Fox righ wing question from  Biden hating Trump supporter is  predictably lazy and stupid lefty reaction. What's to dispute? She's reducing all opinions contrary to hers to absolute ridicule by hyper focussing on the most extreme elements with her critiques thereby avoiding the requirement to address anything other than the extreme. Rupert 101. Still works on the older folk. The younger are savvier. What is it she is AVOIDING to address? On which particular issue, fruitbat? She's waxing hysterical on all the ones she's raised. Would you like to break them down? Shoot. I asked you already and you ignored it. What is it she is AVOIDING to address?  Why are Yes voters shouting abuse? Why does Langton call everyone voting no either a racist or stupid or both? Why does she call Price and her mother 'coloured help''? Why do you avoid addressing such simple points and hide behind 'Murdoch Fox right wing' bluster? The broader point of it all is that lefty identitarians around race, gender, climate, are on emotional edge, liable to flip in the face of disagreement. The OP clip goes for 12 minutes and mentions a number of Emotionally Correct lefty issues and melf-downs. Your response and Guff's are just the local version of that global phenomenon: the blustering, pc/woke wowser and po-faced pwogwessive morality police. Yeah, pretty sure all of that is lies.

;D ;D ;D ;D

And she lost it!!!!


You are all your own parodies.

Frank wrote on Sep 25^th, 2023 at 10:50am:

mothra wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 10:46am: Frank wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 10:45am: mothra wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 10:32am: Frank wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 10:30am: mothra wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 10:15am: Frank wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 10:02am: mothra wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 9:27am: Frank wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 9:12am: AusGeoff wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 3:26am: LOL... former(?) Muslim, and conservative Trump supporter/Biden hater Rita Panahi holds a strange set of often incompatible viewpoints, sometimes apparently even strongly self-contradictory.  It's of no surprise that she works at Murdoch's loony right wing FOX news. ;D ;D ;D ;D Oh, the put-downs!!  "Biden hater". Trump supporter!!  "Former(?)" "Incomprehensible, looney right", "Murdoch Fox" self contradictory  -  go on Sage of outer Gippsland, do the Bbwianesque tsk, tsk  and  ::) ::) ::) Pile on the silly invective - so you don't have to actually refute any of the points, counter any of the arguments. Just do the lefty verbal melt-down, the verbose put-downs and hope that nobody will notice that you have refuted nothing. Says Frank, doing precisely that ... just with more commas than is decent. I take Panahi's point, you and Guff don't. Without saying where she goes wrong, you dismiss it all as not worth disputing. But the fact is, you are unable or too lazy to dispute it, so you deploy the usual lefty invective, hoping that nobody will notice that you are, in fact, too lazy or not up to disputing what is said. Why are Yes activist shouting abuse? Not a difficult question. But to dismiss it as just a Murdoch Fox righ wing question from  Biden hating Trump supporter is  predictably lazy and stupid lefty reaction. What's to dispute? She's reducing all opinions contrary to hers to absolute ridicule by hyper focussing on the most extreme elements with her critiques thereby avoiding the requirement to address anything other than the extreme. Rupert 101. Still works on the older folk. The younger are savvier. What is it she is AVOIDING to address? On which particular issue, fruitbat? She's waxing hysterical on all the ones she's raised. Would you like to break them down? Shoot. I asked you already and you ignored it. What is it she is AVOIDING to address?  Why are Yes voters shouting abuse? Why does Langton call everyone voting no either a racist or stupid or both? Why does she call Price and her mother 'coloured help''? Why do you avoid addressing such simple points and hide behind 'Murdoch Fox right wing' bluster? The broader point of it all is that lefty identitarians around race, gender, climate, are on emotional edge, liable to flip in the face of disagreement. The OP clip goes for 12 minutes and mentions a number of Emotionally Correct lefty issues and melf-downs. Your response and Guff's are just the local version of that global phenomenon: the blustering, pc/woke wowser and po-faced pwogwessive morality police. Yeah, pretty sure all of that is lies. ;D ;D ;D ;D And she lost it!!!! You are all your own parodies.

No fruitbat, you and Rupert are so busy salivating over the extreme end of the arguments you vilify, you've no actual idea what the point is.

That's why your losing relevancy. You're all dying out. Being replaced.

It's a mercy really. Clearly like the dinosaurs, you have shown you are unable to adapt to changing environments. Your better out of the way.

Frank wrote on Sep 25^th, 2023 at 9:12am:

AusGeoff wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 3:26am: LOL... former(?) Muslim, and conservative Trump supporter/Biden hater Rita Panahi holds a strange set of often incompatible viewpoints, sometimes apparently even strongly self-contradictory.  It's of no surprise that she works at Murdoch's loony right wing FOX news. ;D ;D ;D ;D Oh, the put-downs!!  "Biden hater". Trump supporter!!  "Former(?)" "Incomprehensible, looney right", "Murdoch Fox" self contradictory  -  go on Sage of outer Gippsland, do the Bbwianesque tsk, tsk  and  ::) ::) ::) Pile on the silly invective - so you don't have to actually refute any of the points, counter any of the arguments. Just do the lefty verbal melt-down, the verbose put-downs and hope that nobody will notice that you have refuted nothing.

LOL... I have to admit I had a bit of a chuckle reading this mate .    ;)

Seriously though, I guess I was just reinforcing Panahi's rabid,
ultra-right wing politics, which mirrors both the senile Murdoch
and his buffoon golfing mate Trump. 

Which in turn means it's unwise to take any notice of her predictable
anti-leftist whinge sessions on FOX.

This letter to Panahi reflects pretty much my opinion of what's
wrong with her distorted viewpoints, values, racism, and bigotry.

AusGeoff wrote on Sep 26^th, 2023 at 7:39am:

Frank wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 9:12am: AusGeoff wrote on Sep 25th, 2023 at 3:26am: LOL... former(?) Muslim, and conservative Trump supporter/Biden hater Rita Panahi holds a strange set of often incompatible viewpoints, sometimes apparently even strongly self-contradictory.  It's of no surprise that she works at Murdoch's loony right wing FOX news. ;D ;D ;D ;D Oh, the put-downs!!  "Biden hater". Trump supporter!!  "Former(?)" "Incomprehensible, looney right", "Murdoch Fox" self contradictory  -  go on Sage of outer Gippsland, do the Bbwianesque tsk, tsk  and  ::) ::) ::) Pile on the silly invective - so you don't have to actually refute any of the points, counter any of the arguments. Just do the lefty verbal melt-down, the verbose put-downs and hope that nobody will notice that you have refuted nothing. LOL... I have to admit I had a bit of a chuckle reading this mate .    ;) Seriously though, I guess I was just reinforcing Panahi's rabid, ultra-right wing politics, which mirrors both the senile Murdoch and his buffoon golfing mate Trump.  Which in turn means it's unwise to take any notice of her predictable anti-leftist whinge sessions on FOX. This letter to Panahi reflects pretty much my opinion of what's wrong with her distorted viewpoints, values, racism, and bigotry.

Flustered bluster.

Where is the point where someone you disagree with (right wing) becomes 'ultra'? And at what point does 'ultra right wing' reach 'rabid'? What comes after that?

The Guardianistas are unaware of the fact that, in Australia alone, most News Corp newspapers
(i) supported the election of the Gough Whitlam-led Labor Party in December 1972,
(ii) supported the election of the Bob Hawke-led Labor Party in 1984 and 1987 and
(iii) supported the election of the Kevin Rudd-led Labor Party in 2007.



Now, lemme ask, has the ABC and The Granuiad ever supported the election or re-election of any non-Labor/Green Federal government in the past 50 years?

Frank wrote on Oct 1^st, 2023 at 7:52am:

The Guardianistas are unaware of the fact that, in Australia alone, most News Corp newspapers (i) supported the election of the Gough Whitlam-led Labor Party in December 1972, (ii) supported the election of the Bob Hawke-led Labor Party in 1984 and 1987 and (iii) supported the election of the Kevin Rudd-led Labor Party in 2007.

Excellent    [smiley=thumbsup.gif]

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1^st, 2023 at 7:55am:

Frank wrote on Oct 1st, 2023 at 7:52am: The Guardianistas are unaware of the fact that, in Australia alone, most News Corp newspapers (i) supported the election of the Gough Whitlam-led Labor Party in December 1972, (ii) supported the election of the Bob Hawke-led Labor Party in 1984 and 1987 and (iii) supported the election of the Kevin Rudd-led Labor Party in 2007. Excellent    [smiley=thumbsup.gif]

Now, lemme ask, has the ABC and The Granuiad ever supported the election or re-election of any non-Labor/Green Federal government in the past 50 years?

Frank wrote on Oct 1^st, 2023 at 8:14am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2023 at 7:55am: Frank wrote on Oct 1st, 2023 at 7:52am: The Guardianistas are unaware of the fact that, in Australia alone, most News Corp newspapers (i) supported the election of the Gough Whitlam-led Labor Party in December 1972, (ii) supported the election of the Bob Hawke-led Labor Party in 1984 and 1987 and (iii) supported the election of the Kevin Rudd-led Labor Party in 2007. Excellent    [smiley=thumbsup.gif] Now, lemme ask, has the ABC and The Granuiad ever supported the election or re-election of any non-Labor/Green Federal government in the past 50 years?

God, I hope not.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1^st, 2023 at 8:17am:

Frank wrote on Oct 1st, 2023 at 8:14am: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2023 at 7:55am: Frank wrote on Oct 1st, 2023 at 7:52am: The Guardianistas are unaware of the fact that, in Australia alone, most News Corp newspapers (i) supported the election of the Gough Whitlam-led Labor Party in December 1972, (ii) supported the election of the Bob Hawke-led Labor Party in 1984 and 1987 and (iii) supported the election of the Kevin Rudd-led Labor Party in 2007. Excellent    [smiley=thumbsup.gif] Now, lemme ask, has the ABC and The Granuiad ever supported the election or re-election of any non-Labor/Green Federal government in the past 50 years? God, I hope not.

Exactly. Ideology is uber alles on the Left. Lines must be toed, thoughts controlled,

Tree honouring Tony Abbott sawn off again in ‘extremely rare’ act of vandalism

Blue Mountains council to install CCTV after English oak chopped off at the weekend – itself a replacement for another stolen tree honouring former PM


A tree honouring former prime minister Tony Abbott has been chopped down for the second time since it was planted just over two weeks ago, prompting a council to install CCTV so it does not happen a third time.

On 5 August, Abbott had travelled to the Blue Mountains for a ceremony to plant the English oak in front of a crowd of 150 people at the Corridor of Oaks – a memorial park that has seen every Australian prime minister or their nearest living relative plant a tree since 1935.

A few days later, the tree – planted for its “symbolic strength and long lifespan” – had been sawn off.
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/article/2024/aug/20/tree-honouring-tony-abbott-sawn-off-again-in-extremely-rare-act-of-vandalism

Blue mountains cat ladies.

I low how Sky stands behind what youtube video they originally posted that they've hidden it now...

Jasin wrote on Sep 24^th, 2023 at 7:47pm:

;D https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hcannz2iAjc

"Video not availabale in your country"

Can you tell us what she claimed was  another example of "Lefties losing it"? 

Protest from the Left or Right is legal in a democracy; if the method of protest offends some, then that is another matter.

Frank wrote on Oct 1^st, 2023 at 8:20am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2023 at 8:17am: Frank wrote on Oct 1st, 2023 at 8:14am: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2023 at 7:55am: Frank wrote on Oct 1st, 2023 at 7:52am: The Guardianistas are unaware of the fact that, in Australia alone, most News Corp newspapers (i) supported the election of the Gough Whitlam-led Labor Party in December 1972, (ii) supported the election of the Bob Hawke-led Labor Party in 1984 and 1987 and (iii) supported the election of the Kevin Rudd-led Labor Party in 2007. Excellent    [smiley=thumbsup.gif] Now, lemme ask, has the ABC and The Granuiad ever supported the election or re-election of any non-Labor/Green Federal government in the past 50 years? God, I hope not. Exactly. Ideology is uber alles on the Left. Lines must be toed, thoughts controlled,

No; the desire for shared prosperity is uppermost on the Left. 

thegreatdivide wrote on Aug 23^rd, 2024 at 12:56pm:

Frank wrote on Oct 1st, 2023 at 8:20am: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2023 at 8:17am: Frank wrote on Oct 1st, 2023 at 8:14am: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2023 at 7:55am: Frank wrote on Oct 1st, 2023 at 7:52am: The Guardianistas are unaware of the fact that, in Australia alone, most News Corp newspapers (i) supported the election of the Gough Whitlam-led Labor Party in December 1972, (ii) supported the election of the Bob Hawke-led Labor Party in 1984 and 1987 and (iii) supported the election of the Kevin Rudd-led Labor Party in 2007. Excellent    [smiley=thumbsup.gif] Now, lemme ask, has the ABC and The Granuiad ever supported the election or re-election of any non-Labor/Green Federal government in the past 50 years? God, I hope not. Exactly. Ideology is uber alles on the Left. Lines must be toed, thoughts controlled, No; the desire for shared prosperity is uppermost on the Left.

Zero historical evidence of it from the cases of the Left being in power, stating with the Parris Commune, through the Soviet, CCP,  korea, Pol Pot, Venezuela,  etc, etc, etc.

Frank wrote on Aug 23^rd, 2024 at 1:14pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Aug 23rd, 2024 at 12:56pm: Frank wrote on Oct 1st, 2023 at 8:20am: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2023 at 8:17am: Frank wrote on Oct 1st, 2023 at 8:14am: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2023 at 7:55am: Frank wrote on Oct 1st, 2023 at 7:52am: The Guardianistas are unaware of the fact that, in Australia alone, most News Corp newspapers (i) supported the election of the Gough Whitlam-led Labor Party in December 1972, (ii) supported the election of the Bob Hawke-led Labor Party in 1984 and 1987 and (iii) supported the election of the Kevin Rudd-led Labor Party in 2007. Excellent    [smiley=thumbsup.gif] Now, lemme ask, has the ABC and The Granuiad ever supported the election or re-election of any non-Labor/Green Federal government in the past 50 years? God, I hope not. Exactly. Ideology is uber alles on the Left. Lines must be toed, thoughts controlled, No; the desire for shared prosperity is uppermost on the Left.  Zero historical evidence of it from the cases of the Left being in power, stating with the Parris Commune, through the Soviet, CCP,  korea, Pol Pot, Venezuela,  etc, etc, etc.

Me thinks you have no idea what you're talking about.

You're regurgitating talking points you have no understanding of.

SadKangaroo wrote on Aug 23^rd, 2024 at 2:02pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 23rd, 2024 at 1:14pm: thegreatdivide wrote on Aug 23rd, 2024 at 12:56pm: Frank wrote on Oct 1st, 2023 at 8:20am: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2023 at 8:17am: Frank wrote on Oct 1st, 2023 at 8:14am: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2023 at 7:55am: Frank wrote on Oct 1st, 2023 at 7:52am: The Guardianistas are unaware of the fact that, in Australia alone, most News Corp newspapers (i) supported the election of the Gough Whitlam-led Labor Party in December 1972, (ii) supported the election of the Bob Hawke-led Labor Party in 1984 and 1987 and (iii) supported the election of the Kevin Rudd-led Labor Party in 2007. Excellent    [smiley=thumbsup.gif] Now, lemme ask, has the ABC and The Granuiad ever supported the election or re-election of any non-Labor/Green Federal government in the past 50 years? God, I hope not. Exactly. Ideology is uber alles on the Left. Lines must be toed, thoughts controlled, No; the desire for shared prosperity is uppermost on the Left.  Zero historical evidence of it from the cases of the Left being in power, stating with the Parris Commune, through the Soviet, CCP,  korea, Pol Pot, Venezuela,  etc, etc, etc. Me thinks you have no idea what you're talking about. You're regurgitating talking points you have no understanding of.

I do notice that you are not providing any historical evidence either.

The Left IS driven by ideology. Be it Marxist, socialist, environmentalist, etc. It is all rooted in 18 and 9th century ideologies,some updated, twisted, blended.