Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
Member Run Boards >> Extremism Exposed >> EE Vote: Running Commentary
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1701808257

Message started by Ja-Sindarin on Dec 6th, 2023 at 6:30am

Title: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Ja-Sindarin on Dec 6th, 2023 at 6:30am
As a Jew. I absolutely love this song by Laibach: LIFE IS LIFE
I mean, it's not Germany's fault us Jews of the Middle-East turned European peoples into Religious/Political/Military nutters with Oppression in a Covert way. Like Moslems do it in an Overt way. Look what the Europeans did with that 'Power' (of the One Ring) to other peoples around the world.

Whenever people try to piss in my Jewish pocket about the Holocaust as an excuse to 'hate white people'. I simply say "Life is Life". We brought it onto ourselves for 2000 years of a 'lie', until America was discovered and blew our cover, so to speak.
It's called Personal Responsibility (Owning it).

https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/relatedvideo?&q=Laibach+-+life+is+life&&mid=4E15DD3196D07204F1744E15DD3196D07204F174&&FORM=VRDGAR

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Ja-Sindarin on Dec 6th, 2023 at 6:31am
...oh. Shout out to Gaybriel  ;) :)

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 6th, 2023 at 6:37am

Jasin wrote on Dec 6th, 2023 at 6:31am:
...oh. Shout out to Gaybriel  ;) :)



Gabriel is an archangel with the power to announce God's will to mankind:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xTrQ7vUZsIo

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Ja-Sindarin on Dec 6th, 2023 at 6:43am
Gaybriel came to me in a Vision last week, about running for Moderator here.
She came to me in my sleep, like an Angel from above and stroked my blonde hair and whispered in my ear "Take no Prisoners!"

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 6th, 2023 at 6:52am

Jasin wrote on Dec 6th, 2023 at 6:43am:
Gaybriel came to me in a Vision last week, about running for Moderator here.
She came to me in my sleep, like an Angel from above and stroked my blonde hair and whispered in my ear "Take no Prisoners!"



In my time of dying - lyrics:


Oh, Saint Peter at the gates of Heaven
Won't you let me in?
I never did no harm, I never did no wrong
Oh, oh, Gabriel, let me blow your horn, let me blow your horn
Oh, I never did no harm, did no harm

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 6th, 2023 at 7:05am
You did plenty of harm.

You will be at the portal into Hell, not the pearly gates.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 6th, 2023 at 7:06am
If Jaye wins, how long before he hands the Modship over?

3 weeks?

1 month?

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 6th, 2023 at 7:15am

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 6th, 2023 at 7:05am:
You did plenty of harm.

You will be at the portal into Hell, not the pearly gates.



Monk,
one day you will be at the Pearly Gates and
have to explain yourself to St Peter.
He will either unlock the gates or he'll pull a lever to a trap door.
He'll know if you're lying.



Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 6th, 2023 at 7:18am
I don’t believe in that rubbish, doxxer!

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 6th, 2023 at 7:20am

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 6th, 2023 at 7:18am:
I don’t believe in that rubbish, doxxer!



Robert Plant does.
Are you saying he's wrong?

'he never did no harm, he never did no wrong'


Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Ja-Sindarin on Dec 6th, 2023 at 7:21am
Monk's scrapping for a Gay-War with Bobby again.
Derail, distract and the need to make another Topic all about himself.  ::)
Go on Bobby, feed your 'Troll' Monk.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 6th, 2023 at 7:26am

Jasin wrote on Dec 6th, 2023 at 7:21am:
Monk's scrapping for a Gay-War with Bobby again.
Derail, distract and the need to make another Topic all about himself.  ::)
Go on Bobby, feed your 'Troll' Monk.



dear JaSin,
if you win, how will you cope with Monk's extreme behaviour?

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by John Smith on Dec 6th, 2023 at 7:39am

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 6th, 2023 at 7:06am:
If Jaye wins, how long before he hands the Modship over?

3 weeks?

1 month?



Depends on his parole officer

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 6th, 2023 at 7:39am
Booby believes in that crap. He is headed straight for the hot place.  ;D

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 6th, 2023 at 7:55am

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 6th, 2023 at 7:39am:
Booby believes in that crap. He is headed straight for the hot place.  ;D



Monk,
you still have time to repent.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 6th, 2023 at 8:59am
YOU are the troll, blackmailer and doxxer, I suggest YOU repent NOW!

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 6th, 2023 at 9:00am
Jaye has 5 votes, Brian 3, six days to go.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Ja-Sindarin on Dec 6th, 2023 at 10:06am
Monk. Stop trying to have an 'engagement' with Bobby just to ruin this Topic with your blathering for his attentions and get this Topic Deleted.
This is not a Topic about getting 'married' either.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Carl D on Dec 6th, 2023 at 10:10am
And people wonder why I never want to take a Mod job in this place.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 6th, 2023 at 10:11am

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 6th, 2023 at 8:59am:
YOU are the troll, blackmailer and doxxer, I suggest YOU repent NOW!



Monk,
The rapture will happen soon be prepared.
Know and believe that Jesus died on the cross for your sins and sins of the world shed his blood and
rose three days later from the grave and went back to heaven to prepare a place.
Turn away from your sins and ask forgiveness and accept Jesus Christ as your Lord and Personal Saviour.
God will forgive your sins no matter what they are.

Galatians 5:19-21    KJV



19 Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness,

20 Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies,

21 Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Ja-Sindarin on Dec 6th, 2023 at 11:00am

Carl D wrote on Dec 6th, 2023 at 10:10am:
And people wonder why I never want to take a Mod job in this place.


It's like the Northern Territory Carl.D
You'll never never know,
if you never never go?

I enjoyed my first stint as a Mod. I saved a worthy Board from deletion (but couldn't save Real Estate too). Kept it ticking along with an improved foundation and then along came Sophia of whom I saw 'potential'! like a Talent Scout would. I asked her and the powers that be about making her the New Mod as I saw in her something more 'precise' about the theme of Travel and a grace that would make her a good Mod. In other words: I was unselfishly putting the good of the Forum as a whole, before myself. It was, as I deem it a positive and constructive move upon two accounts both in saving the Board and giving it a RENAISSANCE via Sophia.

So for me. Being a Mod was a 'Positive' experience.
Some on the other hand have ruined Boards in a very negative way.

The Modship is only as good as you want it to be Carl.

Ask FD for Corona-Covid Board and he might give it to you outright rather than dissolving it into the Health & Wellbeing Board (to which Gordon, didn't want Covid or Women's Issues when it came down to it). You too might 'Save a Board'.  ;)


...but I know you won't.  :-X

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 6th, 2023 at 11:22am

Carl D wrote on Dec 6th, 2023 at 10:10am:
And people wonder why I never want to take a Mod job in this place.


It is easy enough. Time wasters and trolls like Booby and Jaye can be banned.

I would LOVE a board covering covid, its variants, vaxxes etc seriously. That would be good for OzPol too, BTW.

You are the natural choice, Carl! Boot Nails and Booby and suddenly you have a decent board with a low garbage content.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Ja-Sindarin on Dec 6th, 2023 at 11:25am
There you have it Carl.D.
My version
Monks version (for Brian?)
...and no version from Brian.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 6th, 2023 at 3:24pm
Nothing to do with anything other than the two cretins, Booby & Nail, do not post interesting and informative posts especially about covid19.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Aussie on Dec 6th, 2023 at 4:19pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 6th, 2023 at 7:06am:
If Jaye wins, how long before he hands the Modship over?

3 weeks?

1 month?


Funny you ask that of him yet you don't ask Agnes!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 6th, 2023 at 4:38pm
Jaye has a lot less staying power than Agnes.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Aussie on Dec 6th, 2023 at 5:06pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 6th, 2023 at 4:38pm:
Jaye has a lot less staying power than Agnes.


Rubbish, Agnes abandoned TWO Boards, one especially created for her.   Come to think of it, perhaps even Relationships as well was especially created for her by FD before you and I arrived here at OzPol. 

Agnes, did he?

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Ja-Sindarin on Dec 6th, 2023 at 7:17pm

Aussie wrote on Dec 6th, 2023 at 5:06pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 6th, 2023 at 4:38pm:
Jaye has a lot less staying power than Agnes.


Rubbish, Agnes abandoned TWO Boards, one especially created for her.   Come to think of it, perhaps even Relationships as well was especially created for her by FD before you and I arrived here at OzPol. 

Agnes, did he?


He's just saying that to antagonise a reaction.
He know's he's just 'blathering B-S' as his usual.

Agnes dumped Relationships to the void.
FD had to ask someone to take it over.

Agnes asked for The Tavern to be created for her.
Then she folded on it and gave it to AiA.
Nothing wrong with that.
But it turned out to be a giant cock-up!
AiA had to be permanently banned for 'many' reasons.

Now Agnes got the Tavern back, just - in her own words 'to prevent Lisa from getting it!'.
She got it back and now doesn't want it again as 'The Tavern'.

Monk running around like a biatch on heat chasing its own tail frothing with rabid fervour spraying all sorts of bulls)hit left right and centre without a care but just to troll and nothing more.


Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Ja-Sindarin on Dec 6th, 2023 at 8:24pm
I wish to thank those who have voted for me so far.

Am surprised to see I'm running against Brian.
I thought it wasn't allowed for someone to Mod two Boards?

Oh well, the way things have changed around here.
It's a case of 'it is what it is'.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Dnarever on Dec 6th, 2023 at 9:19pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 6th, 2023 at 4:38pm:
Jaye has a lot less staying power than Agnes.


To me there is almost nobody more skilled on extremism than JaSin I see the question as can JaSin be trusted to not moderate extremism in a extreme manner.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Ja-Sindarin on Dec 6th, 2023 at 9:32pm

Dnarever wrote on Dec 6th, 2023 at 9:19pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 6th, 2023 at 4:38pm:
Jaye has a lot less staying power than Agnes.


To me there is almost nobody more skilled on extremism than JaSin I see the question as can JaSin be trusted to not moderate extremism in a extreme manner.


You mean, like a Dictator Moderator like Brian, Peccary, Monk and now Agnes (sometimes Philperth) - who ban Members because they can't 'compete fairly' with them on Topics on their Boards, because they ban Members who don't 'agree' with their views and opinions in an 'absolutist' way, because they ban Members because they know they are wrong and the Members are right and so on????

Er, no. It's not the Extremism I will be aiming for.
If I have to ban someone, its because they themselves asked me to ban them or, they have themselves been 'extreme' against other Members like AiA was.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 6th, 2023 at 10:33pm

Jasin wrote on Dec 6th, 2023 at 9:32pm:

Dnarever wrote on Dec 6th, 2023 at 9:19pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 6th, 2023 at 4:38pm:
Jaye has a lot less staying power than Agnes.


To me there is almost nobody more skilled on extremism than JaSin I see the question as can JaSin be trusted to not moderate extremism in a extreme manner.


You mean, like a Dictator Moderator like Brian, Peccary, Monk and now Agnes (sometimes Philperth) - who ban Members because they can't 'compete fairly' with them on Topics on their Boards, because they ban Members who don't 'agree' with their views and opinions in an 'absolutist' way, because they ban Members because they know they are wrong and the Members are right and so on????

Er, no. It's not the Extremism I will be aiming for.
If I have to ban someone, its because they themselves asked me to ban them or, they have themselves been 'extreme' against other Members like AiA was.



Yes - we have too many ban happy mods.

Monk didn't even ban me for anything I wrote on his MRB -
it was just because he doesn't like me.
Go figure?

Brian banned me for quoting Alexander Downer in a post.
Go figure?

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Ja-Sindarin on Dec 6th, 2023 at 10:52pm
Yeah. It's pretty poor form for Mods to be so 'flippant' in their bans of Members from their Boards because they just can't plain 'Cope' with being a Mod.
The irony of this along with their hypocrisy (lying) shows how inadequate they are to be Moderators and this lowers the level of the Forum as a whole, in my opinion (for the opinion of the Owner of this Forum may be completely different and in disagreement with this).

Brian, Peccary & Monk (Philperth occasionally and now Agnes, just recently) have shown their inability to deal with discussion, disagreement and Members in general - as their Boards have become almost 'ghost-towns' of just a few Members who 'bother' to visit.

I'm not saying that other Mods don't ban members. But they are not 'flippant' and 'fragile' in their motivations and actions and ironically - it's these Mods who get themselves banned.

Disagree with Brian's view and its a banning offence.
Probably the prime 'Dictator', again ironic considering he's Mod of Defence (though its unsure if its really Military 'defence' or Legal, Medical and Sporting 'defences' ? :D).

Going by recent events of FD granting Monk's & Mothra's wishes as 'good ideas'.
I wasn't surprised to see Mod Brian running for a 2nd Board, just to throw everyone else out as to the belief that Mods can't Mod two Boards.
It's that or FD plans to shaft this Board anyway, etc, etc ::)

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 6th, 2023 at 10:57pm
Hi JaSin,
I think Brian would have to give up the Defence MRB if he wins but he's losing.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Ja-Sindarin on Dec 6th, 2023 at 11:04pm

Bobby. wrote on Dec 6th, 2023 at 10:57pm:
Hi JaSin,
I think Brian would have to give up the Defence MRB if he wins but he's losing.


Well maybe he admits that he has put holes in his Boat (Board) and like a dirty rat, is trying to swim away from it's sinking feeling, towards this Board? So he can put holes in this one too?
But the way FD has been operating of late, upon the whims of the likes of Monk, Mothra, etc - I wouldn't be in the least surprised if he lets Brian Mod both or merges both Boards, 'etc-etc'.

Considering I couldn't nominate myself until the last two days of application. Brian probably thought he had an easy grab like a Porch-Pirate.

Still, anything can happen Bobby.
Brian could suddenly get a late surge, like Grapps did in The Tavern Election and with some corrupt Trolls who 'can' pull the wool over the GMODS/Admin eyes with some Socks - as proven in the past. Can make Brian 'Dictator' of two Boards in his Empire conquests of more territory.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 6th, 2023 at 11:19pm

Jasin wrote on Dec 6th, 2023 at 11:04pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 6th, 2023 at 10:57pm:
Hi JaSin,
I think Brian would have to give up the Defence MRB if he wins but he's losing.


Well maybe he admits that he has put holes in his Boat (Board) and like a dirty rat, is trying to swim away from it's sinking feeling, towards this Board? So he can put holes in this one too?
But the way FD has been operating of late, upon the whims of the likes of Monk, Mothra, etc - I wouldn't be in the least surprised if he lets Brian Mod both or merges both Boards, 'etc-etc'.

Considering I couldn't nominate myself until the last two days of application. Brian probably thought he had an easy grab like a Porch-Pirate.

Still, anything can happen Bobby.
Brian could suddenly get a late surge, like Grapps did in The Tavern Election and with some corrupt Trolls who 'can' pull the wool over the GMODS/Admin eyes with some Socks - as proven in the past. Can make Brian 'Dictator' of two Boards in his Empire conquests of more territory.



FD is only putting minor MRBs together that have similar subject matter:

Philosophy, Spirituality and Atheism would merge together but
not Extremism and Defence.

Don't worry about Brian - he has little support after crossing too many posters.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Dnarever on Dec 6th, 2023 at 11:42pm

Bobby. wrote on Dec 6th, 2023 at 10:33pm:

Jasin wrote on Dec 6th, 2023 at 9:32pm:

Dnarever wrote on Dec 6th, 2023 at 9:19pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 6th, 2023 at 4:38pm:
Jaye has a lot less staying power than Agnes.


To me there is almost nobody more skilled on extremism than JaSin I see the question as can JaSin be trusted to not moderate extremism in a extreme manner.


You mean, like a Dictator Moderator like Brian, Peccary, Monk and now Agnes (sometimes Philperth) - who ban Members because they can't 'compete fairly' with them on Topics on their Boards, because they ban Members who don't 'agree' with their views and opinions in an 'absolutist' way, because they ban Members because they know they are wrong and the Members are right and so on????

Er, no. It's not the Extremism I will be aiming for.
If I have to ban someone, its because they themselves asked me to ban them or, they have themselves been 'extreme' against other Members like AiA was.



Yes - we have too many ban happy mods.

Monk didn't even ban me for anything I wrote on his MRB -
it was just because he doesn't like me.
Go figure?

Brian banned me for quoting Alexander Downer in a post.
Go figure?


Only joking but about 90% of what Downer said would deserve banning.

Though he did report Trumps guy doing deals with the Russians in the 2016 election.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Dnarever on Dec 6th, 2023 at 11:46pm
The last election had the option to change or remove your vote on this one we seem to be locked in.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 6th, 2023 at 11:46pm

Dnarever wrote on Dec 6th, 2023 at 11:42pm:
Only joking but about 90% of what Downer said would deserve banning.

Though he did report Trumps guy doing deals with the Russians in the 2016 election.



It's all explained here especially reply#3

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1698655992/0#0

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Ja-Sindarin on Dec 6th, 2023 at 11:54pm

Dnarever wrote on Dec 6th, 2023 at 11:46pm:
The last election had the option to change or remove your vote on this one we seem to be locked in.


Lock it in Eddy (VIC)  ;D

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by AusGeoff on Dec 7th, 2023 at 12:26am

Jasin wrote on Dec 6th, 2023 at 11:54pm:

Dnarever wrote on Dec 6th, 2023 at 11:46pm:
The last election had the option to change or remove your vote on this one we seem to be locked in.


Lock it in Eddy (VIC)  ;D



LOL... but only until the end of the year.    :D



Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Vic on Dec 7th, 2023 at 5:33am

Dnarever wrote on Dec 6th, 2023 at 11:46pm:
The last election had the option to change or remove your vote on this one we seem to be locked in.


Fixed, DNA!

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 7th, 2023 at 8:29am

Vic wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 5:33am:

Dnarever wrote on Dec 6th, 2023 at 11:46pm:
The last election had the option to change or remove your vote on this one we seem to be locked in.


Fixed, DNA!



yep - there is a "remove vote" button.   :)

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Ja-Sindarin on Dec 7th, 2023 at 4:23pm
Well no real high 'drama' on the seas with this Topic and Election eh VIC?
You must be pleased, no deletion of Topic or Bannings?

VIC?


...VIC?



Wake up VIC!  ;D

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 7th, 2023 at 4:25pm

Jasin wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 4:23pm:
Well no real high 'drama' on the seas with this Topic and Election eh VIC?
You must be pleased, no deletion of Topic or Bannings?

VIC?

...VIC?

Wake up VIC!  ;D



It's 9 to 4 with all those late votes still to come.

Could the ban happy man still win?


Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Vic on Dec 7th, 2023 at 4:57pm

Jasin wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 4:23pm:
Well no real high 'drama' on the seas with this Topic and Election eh VIC?
You must be pleased, no deletion of Topic or Bannings?

VIC?


...VIC?



Wake up VIC!  ;D


All is well……days to go yet my Dear!

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Brian Ross on Dec 7th, 2023 at 5:05pm
Children, children, quieten down.  Bobby you were banned because you repeated your lies and innuendo about Australia's acquisition of nuclear submarines, after you had been told they were lies and conspiracy theories without fact.  You refused to change so you were banned.

JaSin you were banned because you refused to adhere to the stated rules of the forum.  You kept on abusing me and other posters, so you were banned.

You both deserved your bans.  QED.

Here, if elected, I would moderate differently to the Defence Forum.  Abuse would again not be tolerated but discussion would be.  Civilised discussion, that is.  Something sadly lacking from the forum in total and this forum in particular.  Vote for me, if you favour sane moderation.  I will be here for the long term, not a short term. 

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 7th, 2023 at 5:11pm
Brian,

Quote:
Bobby you were banned because you repeated your lies and innuendo about Australia's acquisition of nuclear submarines, after you had been told they were lies and conspiracy theories without fact.  You refused to change so you were banned.


That's bullshit -

it's all here:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1698655992/0#0

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Black Orchid on Dec 7th, 2023 at 6:41pm

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 5:05pm:
Children, children, quieten down.  Bobby you were banned because you repeated your lies and innuendo about Australia's acquisition of nuclear submarines, after you had been told they were lies and conspiracy theories without fact.  You refused to change so you were banned.


It's a message board, Brian.  If you ban everyone you disagree with eventually there is no-one left to post.

Ditto banning on personalities you don't like.  We have too much of that here already.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Aussie on Dec 7th, 2023 at 6:43pm

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 6:41pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 5:05pm:
Children, children, quieten down.  Bobby you were banned because you repeated your lies and innuendo about Australia's acquisition of nuclear submarines, after you had been told they were lies and conspiracy theories without fact.  You refused to change so you were banned.


It's a message board, Brian.  If you ban everyone you disagree with eventually there is no-one left to post.

Ditto banning on personalities you don't like.  We have too much of that here already.


Yes...hence your fatal blows to the sewer.  Glad to see you have learned.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 7th, 2023 at 6:45pm

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 6:41pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 5:05pm:
Children, children, quieten down.  Bobby you were banned because you repeated your lies and innuendo about Australia's acquisition of nuclear submarines, after you had been told they were lies and conspiracy theories without fact.  You refused to change so you were banned.


It's a message board, Brian.  If you ban everyone you disagree with eventually there is no-one left to post.

Ditto banning on personalities you don't like.  We have too much of that here already.



What Brian is saying is that if Alexander Downer joined this forum -
he would be banned from Brian's MRB -
as his opinions would not be acceptable.



Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Ja-Sindarin on Dec 7th, 2023 at 6:53pm
My abuse to Brian in his 'Dictatorship' (Defence) Board was justified in his psychotic hypocrisy of abusing/trolling other members on other Boards and Sections.
But when it came to his own 'Control Freak' luxury in Defence, it was a whole different hypocritical ball game.

So much so, his 'control freak' character began mostly with his 'discipline' if other Members didn't follow/agree with his views in 'absolutism'.
You could say, he was taking Defence a bit too 'seriously'.

In Spatchcock's (former Member) dissaproval of Brian getting to be Mod. She warned she would leave (because he's a typical sexist pig as well) entirely if he became Mod of Defence. Warning that he would 'kill the Board'.

She has been right. Brian now seeks to Mod Extremism Exposed because...
a) he wishes to Mod two Boards, knowing it is not allowed.
b) wishes to Mod two Boards, knowing it 'will be' allowed.
c) Defence is sunk, he's swimming to this 'Raft' now.
d) No one attends Defence anymore - wonder why?
e) He just want's to ruin another Board?
f) All of the above?


Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Ja-Sindarin on Dec 7th, 2023 at 6:57pm
Don't get me wrong.
I'm happy to get E-E via Election and competition.
Just didn't think it would be Brian.
Thought maybe John Smith would finally give it a go - despite being a Moron? JS probably told Monk to shut up.

I wish Brian all the best in the Election.
I'm just a humble Fremen,
up against a well trained Sardaukhar.
  ;)

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Black Orchid on Dec 7th, 2023 at 7:22pm

Aussie wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 6:43pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 6:41pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 5:05pm:
Children, children, quieten down.  Bobby you were banned because you repeated your lies and innuendo about Australia's acquisition of nuclear submarines, after you had been told they were lies and conspiracy theories without fact.  You refused to change so you were banned.


It's a message board, Brian.  If you ban everyone you disagree with eventually there is no-one left to post.

Ditto banning on personalities you don't like.  We have too much of that here already.


Yes...hence your fatal blows to the sewer.  Glad to see you have learned.


As you well know I never banned you and your mongs from PA.  Skippy banned you (as did SN before him on and off) but Skippy kept you banned and I merely followed in his expert footsteps.   I continually asked the membership if they wanted any of you back.  The resounding answer was NO each and every time I asked.

I did, however, ban your pathetic socks that you reinstated to elect yourself EL.  Despite your lies and hysterical threads here at OP, PA was thriving when I decided to stand down and let someone else take over.

Repeating a lie does not make it true and how's it all working out for you and your socks now?   LOL

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Aussie on Dec 7th, 2023 at 7:30pm

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 7:22pm:

Aussie wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 6:43pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 6:41pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 5:05pm:
Children, children, quieten down.  Bobby you were banned because you repeated your lies and innuendo about Australia's acquisition of nuclear submarines, after you had been told they were lies and conspiracy theories without fact.  You refused to change so you were banned.


It's a message board, Brian.  If you ban everyone you disagree with eventually there is no-one left to post.

Ditto banning on personalities you don't like.  We have too much of that here already.


Yes...hence your fatal blows to the sewer.  Glad to see you have learned.


As you well know I never banned you and your mongs from PA.  Skippy banned you (as did SN before him on and off) but Skippy kept you banned and I merely followed in his expert footsteps.   I continually asked the membership if they wanted any of you back.  The resounding answer was NO each and every time I asked.

I did, however, ban your pathetic socks that you reinstated to elect yourself EL.  Despite your lies and hysterical threads here at OP, PA was thriving when I decided to stand down and let someone else take over.

Repeating a lie does not make it true and how's it all working out for you and your socks now?   LOL


You kept the bans going.  That was your decision.  You made Neferti, Agnes your few Yank Members happy I guess, but where are they now?

You have no idea about socks.  You fired from the hip.  Believing a new registrant was a sock was dumb.  I wonder how many genuine people you cut off at the pass, hey?  I would not know, because you never got anywhere near any of my socks.

Forgot to add.....

"LOL"

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Baronvonrort on Dec 7th, 2023 at 7:47pm

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 5:05pm:
Children, children, quieten down.  Bobby you were banned because you repeated your lies and innuendo about Australia's acquisition of nuclear submarines, after you had been told they were lies and conspiracy theories without fact.  You refused to change so you were banned.

JaSin you were banned because you refused to adhere to the stated rules of the forum.  You kept on abusing me and other posters, so you were banned.

You both deserved your bans.  QED.

Here, if elected, I would moderate differently to the Defence Forum.  Abuse would again not be tolerated but discussion would be.  Civilised discussion, that is.  Something sadly lacking from the forum in total and this forum in particular.  Vote for me, if you favour sane moderation.  I will be here for the long term, not a short term. 


Am i banned from your section or was that PM you sent me a threat to ban me?

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Ja-Sindarin on Dec 7th, 2023 at 8:28pm
Thankyou to my 11th Voter.
Much appreciated.  :)

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Black Orchid on Dec 7th, 2023 at 9:39pm

Aussie wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 7:30pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 7:22pm:

Aussie wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 6:43pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 6:41pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 5:05pm:
Children, children, quieten down.  Bobby you were banned because you repeated your lies and innuendo about Australia's acquisition of nuclear submarines, after you had been told they were lies and conspiracy theories without fact.  You refused to change so you were banned.


It's a message board, Brian.  If you ban everyone you disagree with eventually there is no-one left to post.

Ditto banning on personalities you don't like.  We have too much of that here already.


Yes...hence your fatal blows to the sewer.  Glad to see you have learned.


As you well know I never banned you and your mongs from PA.  Skippy banned you (as did SN before him on and off) but Skippy kept you banned and I merely followed in his expert footsteps.   I continually asked the membership if they wanted any of you back.  The resounding answer was NO each and every time I asked.

I did, however, ban your pathetic socks that you reinstated to elect yourself EL.  Despite your lies and hysterical threads here at OP, PA was thriving when I decided to stand down and let someone else take over.

Repeating a lie does not make it true and how's it all working out for you and your socks now?   LOL


You kept the bans going.  That was your decision.  You made Neferti, Agnes your few Yank Members happy I guess, but where are they now?

You have no idea about socks.  You fired from the hip.  Believing a new registrant was a sock was dumb.  I wonder how many genuine people you cut off at the pass, hey?  I would not know, because you never got anywhere near any of my socks.

Forgot to add.....

"LOL"


Agnes was never there.  She doesn't like me and I am oh so upset.   Neferti passed away and everyone else left when you disruptive hostile idiots were let back in and turned PA back into a circus.   Duhhh!   Always always on the attack.    ::)

Ausse you think you are so smart but newsflash!  You're not.  How are your socks and you holding up or are they back in their stable until the next election.  Oh that's right there won't be another election!    :D

Now do go away and stop always following me around like a bad smell.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by John Smith on Dec 7th, 2023 at 9:40pm

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 6:41pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 5:05pm:
Children, children, quieten down.  Bobby you were banned because you repeated your lies and innuendo about Australia's acquisition of nuclear submarines, after you had been told they were lies and conspiracy theories without fact.  You refused to change so you were banned.


It's a message board, Brian.  If you ban everyone you disagree with eventually there is no-one left to post.

Ditto banning on personalities you don't like.  We have too much of that here already.



She's speaking from first hand experience Brian.  :D

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Brian Ross on Dec 7th, 2023 at 9:55pm

Bobby. wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 6:45pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 6:41pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 5:05pm:
Children, children, quieten down.  Bobby you were banned because you repeated your lies and innuendo about Australia's acquisition of nuclear submarines, after you had been told they were lies and conspiracy theories without fact.  You refused to change so you were banned.


It's a message board, Brian.  If you ban everyone you disagree with eventually there is no-one left to post.

Ditto banning on personalities you don't like.  We have too much of that here already.


What Brian is saying is that if Alexander Downer joined this forum -
he would be banned from Brian's MRB -
as his opinions would not be acceptable.


Oh, no, Bobby, he'd find, like you did, that he would treated with curtesy, until he refused to accept his lies and conspiracy theories had been corrected, He would not be allowed to bullshit us like you did, Bobby. Then he would be banned.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  ::) ::)

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Ja-Sindarin on Dec 7th, 2023 at 9:56pm
You're such a 'fragile' Brian  ::)

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 7th, 2023 at 9:57pm

I have to chime in here.

BO was only following the wishes of the majority of the PA members
when the Mongs were banned.
I did so too after I was more or less forced to have a vote on it.
From memory it was 9 votes to zero that I should ban them all.
What is a leader supposed to do when they get a vote like that - ignore it?


Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Brian Ross on Dec 7th, 2023 at 9:57pm

Jasin wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 6:53pm:
My abuse to Brian in his 'Dictatorship' (Defence) Board was justified in his psychotic hypocrisy of abusing/trolling other members on other Boards and Sections.
But when it came to his own 'Control Freak' luxury in Defence, it was a whole different hypocritical ball game.

So much so, his 'control freak' character began mostly with his 'discipline' if other Members didn't follow/agree with his views in 'absolutism'.
You could say, he was taking Defence a bit too 'seriously'.

In Spatchcock's (former Member) dissaproval of Brian getting to be Mod. She warned she would leave (because he's a typical sexist pig as well) entirely if he became Mod of Defence. Warning that he would 'kill the Board'.

She has been right. Brian now seeks to Mod Extremism Exposed because...
a) he wishes to Mod two Boards, knowing it is not allowed.
b) wishes to Mod two Boards, knowing it 'will be' allowed.
c) Defence is sunk, he's swimming to this 'Raft' now.
d) No one attends Defence anymore - wonder why?
e) He just want's to ruin another Board?
f) All of the above?


Spatchcock?  JaSin you should make up fantasies.  How I act in other forums is that I obey the rules laid down. You might like to try that for a change.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  ::) ::)

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Brian Ross on Dec 7th, 2023 at 9:59pm

Baronvonrort wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 7:47pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 5:05pm:
Children, children, quieten down.  Bobby you were banned because you repeated your lies and innuendo about Australia's acquisition of nuclear submarines, after you had been told they were lies and conspiracy theories without fact.  You refused to change so you were banned.

JaSin you were banned because you refused to adhere to the stated rules of the forum.  You kept on abusing me and other posters, so you were banned.

You both deserved your bans.  QED.

Here, if elected, I would moderate differently to the Defence Forum.  Abuse would again not be tolerated but discussion would be.  Civilised discussion, that is.  Something sadly lacking from the forum in total and this forum in particular.  Vote for me, if you favour sane moderation.  I will be here for the long term, not a short term. 


Am i banned from your section or was that PM you sent me a threat to ban me?


A warning, Baron. I do not make threats, I make promises.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  ::) ::)

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 7th, 2023 at 10:00pm

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 9:55pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 6:45pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 6:41pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 5:05pm:
Children, children, quieten down.  Bobby you were banned because you repeated your lies and innuendo about Australia's acquisition of nuclear submarines, after you had been told they were lies and conspiracy theories without fact.  You refused to change so you were banned.


It's a message board, Brian.  If you ban everyone you disagree with eventually there is no-one left to post.

Ditto banning on personalities you don't like.  We have too much of that here already.


What Brian is saying is that if Alexander Downer joined this forum -
he would be banned from Brian's MRB -
as his opinions would not be acceptable.


Oh, no, Bobby, he'd find, like you did, that he would treated with curtesy, until he refused to accept his lies and conspiracy theories had been corrected, He would not be allowed to bullshit us like you did, Bobby. Then he would be banned.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  ::) ::)



You can't ban Alexander Downer.    ::)


Alexander Downer,
(born September 9, 1951, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia),
Australian Liberal Party politician who led his party for a brief period in 1994–95
and who served as minister of foreign affairs (1996–2007)
and as Australia’s high commissioner to the United Kingdom (2014–18).

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Brian Ross on Dec 7th, 2023 at 10:02pm

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 6:41pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 5:05pm:
Children, children, quieten down.  Bobby you were banned because you repeated your lies and innuendo about Australia's acquisition of nuclear submarines, after you had been told they were lies and conspiracy theories without fact.  You refused to change so you were banned.


It's a message board, Brian.  If you ban everyone you disagree with eventually there is no-one left to post.

Ditto banning on personalities you don't like.  We have too much of that here already.


It appears that you do not understand the rules of civilised discourse, Black Orchid.  I only ban those that cannot follow the rules.  You obey the rules and you won't be banned.  Tsk, tsk, tsk....  ::) ::)

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Ja-Sindarin on Dec 7th, 2023 at 10:07pm

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 9:59pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 7:47pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 5:05pm:
Children, children, quieten down.  Bobby you were banned because you repeated your lies and innuendo about Australia's acquisition of nuclear submarines, after you had been told they were lies and conspiracy theories without fact.  You refused to change so you were banned.

JaSin you were banned because you refused to adhere to the stated rules of the forum.  You kept on abusing me and other posters, so you were banned.

You both deserved your bans.  QED.

Here, if elected, I would moderate differently to the Defence Forum.  Abuse would again not be tolerated but discussion would be.  Civilised discussion, that is.  Something sadly lacking from the forum in total and this forum in particular.  Vote for me, if you favour sane moderation.  I will be here for the long term, not a short term. 


Am i banned from your section or was that PM you sent me a threat to ban me?


A warning, Baron. I do not make threats, I make promises.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  ::) ::)

Well there's a contradiction right there.  ::)
Also - A Promise Made, is a Debt Unpaid.
We should put an interest rate on your promises.  ;D

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 7th, 2023 at 10:08pm

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 10:02pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 6:41pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 5:05pm:
Children, children, quieten down.  Bobby you were banned because you repeated your lies and innuendo about Australia's acquisition of nuclear submarines, after you had been told they were lies and conspiracy theories without fact.  You refused to change so you were banned.


It's a message board, Brian.  If you ban everyone you disagree with eventually there is no-one left to post.

Ditto banning on personalities you don't like.  We have too much of that here already.


It appears that you do not understand the rules of civilised discourse, Black Orchid.  I only ban those that cannot follow the rules.  You obey the rules and you won't be banned.  Tsk, tsk, tsk....  ::) ::)



You ban people who have a different opinion to yours.

The Defence MRB is about all opinions - not just yours.    tsk tsk    ::)  ::)  ::)


Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Ja-Sindarin on Dec 7th, 2023 at 10:09pm

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 10:02pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 6:41pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 5:05pm:
Children, children, quieten down.  Bobby you were banned because you repeated your lies and innuendo about Australia's acquisition of nuclear submarines, after you had been told they were lies and conspiracy theories without fact.  You refused to change so you were banned.


It's a message board, Brian.  If you ban everyone you disagree with eventually there is no-one left to post.

Ditto banning on personalities you don't like.  We have too much of that here already.


It appears that you do not understand the rules of civilised discourse, Black Orchid.  I only ban those that cannot follow the rules.  You obey the rules and you won't be banned.  Tsk, tsk, tsk....  ::) ::)


Pretty apparent that Brian could never survive in the outside world beyond a barrack. A weak soul, who can't think for himself and hides behind 'rules' that are made for those who can't think for themselves and take 'personal responsibility' for making 'decisions' of their own accord.
Brian is one who needs the 'protection' of the Military - because he is 'weak'.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Black Orchid on Dec 7th, 2023 at 10:19pm

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 9:55pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 6:45pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 6:41pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 5:05pm:
Children, children, quieten down.  Bobby you were banned because you repeated your lies and innuendo about Australia's acquisition of nuclear submarines, after you had been told they were lies and conspiracy theories without fact.  You refused to change so you were banned.


It's a message board, Brian.  If you ban everyone you disagree with eventually there is no-one left to post.

Ditto banning on personalities you don't like.  We have too much of that here already.


What Brian is saying is that if Alexander Downer joined this forum -
he would be banned from Brian's MRB -
as his opinions would not be acceptable.


Oh, no, Bobby, he'd find, like you did, that he would treated with curtesy, until he refused to accept his lies and conspiracy theories had been corrected, He would not be allowed to bullshit us like you did, Bobby. Then he would be banned.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  ::) ::)


'Conspiracy theories' are part and parcel of every forum, Brian.  It's not up to a mod to decide whose opinion is right and whose is wrong.

Forums like these are a dying breed.  You need to be a bit open minded.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Ja-Sindarin on Dec 7th, 2023 at 10:20pm

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 9:57pm:

Jasin wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 6:53pm:
My abuse to Brian in his 'Dictatorship' (Defence) Board was justified in his psychotic hypocrisy of abusing/trolling other members on other Boards and Sections.
But when it came to his own 'Control Freak' luxury in Defence, it was a whole different hypocritical ball game.

So much so, his 'control freak' character began mostly with his 'discipline' if other Members didn't follow/agree with his views in 'absolutism'.
You could say, he was taking Defence a bit too 'seriously'.

In Spatchcock's (former Member) dissaproval of Brian getting to be Mod. She warned she would leave (because he's a typical sexist pig as well) entirely if he became Mod of Defence. Warning that he would 'kill the Board'.

She has been right. Brian now seeks to Mod Extremism Exposed because...
a) he wishes to Mod two Boards, knowing it is not allowed.
b) wishes to Mod two Boards, knowing it 'will be' allowed.
c) Defence is sunk, he's swimming to this 'Raft' now.
d) No one attends Defence anymore - wonder why?
e) He just want's to ruin another Board?
f) All of the above?


Spatchcock?  JaSin you should make up fantasies.  How I act in other forums is that I obey the rules laid down. You might like to try that for a change.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  ::) ::)

You're denial of Spatchcocks opinion of you as a Mod shows your false efforts to coerce that Spatchcock doesn't exist and is mere fantasy. Not very convincing.

'Rules' are only one side of the brain Brian.
You think it is for both sides of the Brain which is where you are flawed and wrong like an over-cooked over-achiever.
People like you 'break', because you can never bend in the wind and the wind never adhere's to 'rules' other than its own.
If you are just thinking 'Rules' via just half of your brain, then you are indeed a complete half-wit.

I do Rules, but I also do more than 'just rules'.

What do you do when there are no 'Rules' Brian?
Can you cope when the enemy doesn't play by 'your rules' on the battlefield?
I doubt it.

I follow the Rules. But I also 'bend' the Rules as they should be. It's called 'flexibility', it's also like 'variation' in the gene pool - though you seem more 'pure' like an inbreed Hapsburg.  ;D

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 7th, 2023 at 10:21pm

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 10:19pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 9:55pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 6:45pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 6:41pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 5:05pm:
Children, children, quieten down.  Bobby you were banned because you repeated your lies and innuendo about Australia's acquisition of nuclear submarines, after you had been told they were lies and conspiracy theories without fact.  You refused to change so you were banned.


It's a message board, Brian.  If you ban everyone you disagree with eventually there is no-one left to post.

Ditto banning on personalities you don't like.  We have too much of that here already.


What Brian is saying is that if Alexander Downer joined this forum -
he would be banned from Brian's MRB -
as his opinions would not be acceptable.


Oh, no, Bobby, he'd find, like you did, that he would treated with curtesy, until he refused to accept his lies and conspiracy theories had been corrected, He would not be allowed to bullshit us like you did, Bobby. Then he would be banned.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  ::) ::)


'Conspiracy theories' are part and parcel of every forum, Brian.  It's not up to a mod to decide whose opinion is right and whose is wrong.

Forums like these are a dying breed.  You need to be a bit open minded.



True and -

You were only following the wishes of the majority of the PA members
when the Mongs were banned.
I did so too after I was more or less forced to have a vote on it.
From memory it was 9 votes to zero that I should ban them all.
What is a leader supposed to do when they get a vote like that - ignore it?

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Ja-Sindarin on Dec 7th, 2023 at 10:23pm
Let's face it.
Brian is just not a 'people' person.
The 'rules' fail him completely in this department.
He lacks a personality for starters and thus comes across as a 'bore' (*yawn  ;)) in his own 'tsk tsk' words in repetitive fashion (lack of imagination too!)  ;D

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 7th, 2023 at 10:26pm

Jasin wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 10:23pm:
Let's face it.
Brian is just not a 'people' person.
The 'rules' fail him completely in this department.
He lacks a personality for starters and thus comes across as a 'bore' (*yawn  ;)) in his own 'tsk tsk' words in repetitive fashion (lack of imagination too!)  ;D



Correct and as such he is unfit to run the EE forum.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Ja-Sindarin on Dec 7th, 2023 at 10:43pm

Bobby. wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 10:26pm:

Jasin wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 10:23pm:
Let's face it.
Brian is just not a 'people' person.
The 'rules' fail him completely in this department.
He lacks a personality for starters and thus comes across as a 'bore' (*yawn  ;)) in his own 'tsk tsk' words in repetitive fashion (lack of imagination too!)  ;D



Correct and as such he is unfit to run the EE forum.


Exactly. He is an 'extremist' that is 'exposed'.
He operates on one side of the brain only. Rigid and Logical because he thinks its 'manly' to be so. Negating the other side of the brain that is Fluid and Emotional - which many archaic males think is 'feminine'. Pure myth and fantasy there. Any Logical decision made without being connected to 'Emotion' is the trait of Psychopaths, Dictators and more.

Brian is institutionalised by 'rules'. Told by superiors that all he needs to succeed is to follow the path 'they' set out for him. But when that path ends - he just stands there, waiting, mentally docile, until further instruction. He hasn't the ability to cut his own path, for want of discovering something 'new', compared to the well known path that he follows. He lives in a world that is 'known', but lacks the ability to understand a world that is 'to know'.

It's soldiers like him that could not survive if behind enemy lines.
He's the Member who has the predictable 'Bluff' in a poker hand with his 'Yawn/Tsk/Tsk' because he has nothing in his hand of cards to offer.

I'm a Centrist. I believe in the Left & Right working together towards a 'Wise Mind'.
Brian is an Extremist - far flung in one direction only like a one sided coin of no worth.

This is why he has applied for EE Board.
He's 'killed' the Defence Board like shooting himself in the foot.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 7th, 2023 at 10:46pm

Jasin wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 10:43pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 10:26pm:

Jasin wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 10:23pm:
Let's face it.
Brian is just not a 'people' person.
The 'rules' fail him completely in this department.
He lacks a personality for starters and thus comes across as a 'bore' (*yawn  ;)) in his own 'tsk tsk' words in repetitive fashion (lack of imagination too!)  ;D



Correct and as such he is unfit to run the EE forum.


Exactly. He is an 'extremist' that is 'exposed'.
He operates on one side of the brain only. Rigid and Logical because he thinks its 'manly' to be so. Negating the other side of the brain that is Fluid and Emotional - which many archaic males think is 'feminine'. Pure myth and fantasy there. Any Logical decision made without being connected to 'Emotion' is the trait of Psychopaths, Dictators and more.

Brian is institutionalised by 'rules'. Told by superiors that all he needs to succeed is to follow the path 'they' set out for him. But when that path ends - he just stands there, waiting, mentally docile, until further instruction. He hasn't the ability to cut his own path, for want of discovering something 'new', compared to the well known path that he follows. He lives in a world that is 'known', but lacks the ability to understand a world that is 'to know'.

It's soldiers like him that could not survive if behind enemy lines.
He's the Member who has the predictable 'Bluff' in a poker hand with his 'Yawn/Tsk/Tsk' because he has nothing in his hand of cards to offer.

I'm a Centrist. I believe in the Left & Right working together towards a 'Wise Mind'.
Brian is an Extremist - far flung in one direction only like a one sided coin of no worth.

This is why he has applied for EE Board.
He's 'killed' the Defence Board like shooting himself in the foot.



yes - Brian follows the Govt. line -

We should pay 9 times the price for our nuke subs -
because both Albo and Dutton said.



Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Ja-Sindarin on Dec 7th, 2023 at 10:59pm
Not only has the Australian Public been 'ripped off' by the USA Government via its Representative known as Prime Minister.
It's proved the incompetence of the Australian Military to build and design its own Submarines.
They whinge about 'Civvies' (Civilians) being 'inferior', but its obvious that the Australian Military can't survive without them.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Ja-Sindarin on Dec 8th, 2023 at 5:04am
Brian's 'rules'.

Re: Banned from this forum
Reply #8 - Oct 30th, 2023 at 9:15pm Banned from this forum is Bobby, until he wakes up and stops fantasizing about his beliefs and arguments.


Re: Banned from this forum
Reply #4 - Apr 4th, 2022 at 10:55am Ayn Marx for being unable to act like an adult.

Re: Banned from this forum
Reply #1 - May 31st, 2021 at 2:57pm Northofnorth for being a
sock.

The last one is a classic.
NorthofNorth has been on this Forum for far longer than Brian. An established Member right from the start of the Forum

Also note: Brian claims that these members have been banned from 'the FORUM', not his 'Board'. Seems Brian considers himself Forum Administrator as well?

Seems the 'rules' for Brian are as straight forward as a Banana Republic.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Aussie on Dec 8th, 2023 at 7:19am

Bobby. wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 10:21pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 10:19pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 9:55pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 6:45pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 6:41pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 5:05pm:
Children, children, quieten down.  Bobby you were banned because you repeated your lies and innuendo about Australia's acquisition of nuclear submarines, after you had been told they were lies and conspiracy theories without fact.  You refused to change so you were banned.


It's a message board, Brian.  If you ban everyone you disagree with eventually there is no-one left to post.

Ditto banning on personalities you don't like.  We have too much of that here already.


What Brian is saying is that if Alexander Downer joined this forum -
he would be banned from Brian's MRB -
as his opinions would not be acceptable.


Oh, no, Bobby, he'd find, like you did, that he would treated with curtesy, until he refused to accept his lies and conspiracy theories had been corrected, He would not be allowed to bullshit us like you did, Bobby. Then he would be banned.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  ::) ::)


'Conspiracy theories' are part and parcel of every forum, Brian.  It's not up to a mod to decide whose opinion is right and whose is wrong.

Forums like these are a dying breed.  You need to be a bit open minded.



True and -

You were only following the wishes of the majority of the PA members
when the Mongs were banned.
I did so too after I was more or less forced to have a vote on it.
From memory it was 9 votes to zero that I should ban them all.
What is a leader supposed to do when they get a vote like that - ignore it?


They lead. 

If all 9 voted to walk over a cliff would you "lead" them over, Bobby?

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 8th, 2023 at 7:30am

Aussie wrote on Dec 8th, 2023 at 7:19am:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 10:21pm:
True and -

You were only following the wishes of the majority of the PA members
when the Mongs were banned.
I did so too after I was more or less forced to have a vote on it.
From memory it was 9 votes to zero that I should ban them all.
What is a leader supposed to do when they get a vote like that - ignore it?


They lead. 

If all 9 voted to walk over a cliff would you "lead" them over, Bobby?



The Exalted Leader is the servant of the members.

However - I take your point -
I got many PMs from members who said that  -
unless the Mongs were banned they wouldn't post anymore.

What happened?
They stopped posting when the Mongs were banned.    ::)

I think they used to get off on the Mong arguments and
once that drama was gone they found it boring?


Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Ja-Sindarin on Dec 8th, 2023 at 7:53am
Maybe the damage was done by the Mongs.
As if they left a dirty dump that lingered long,
even though they were gone (for a short while).

...and how did they get back in
To finish what they started?

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Aussie on Dec 8th, 2023 at 8:05am

Jasin wrote on Dec 8th, 2023 at 7:53am:
Maybe the damage was done by the Mongs.
As if they left a dirty dump that lingered long,
even though they were gone (for a short while).

...and how did they get back in
To finish what they started?


If you really want to go back to original cause, it was when the grub AiA became Admin, who then handed over to the loser AnimalMother, then back to AiA, then Super Nova, then skippy, then BO and then Bobby, the last three being ban happy idiots, but I do concede Bobby was given a hospital pass.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by mothra on Dec 8th, 2023 at 8:14am

Aussie wrote on Dec 8th, 2023 at 8:05am:

Jasin wrote on Dec 8th, 2023 at 7:53am:
Maybe the damage was done by the Mongs.
As if they left a dirty dump that lingered long,
even though they were gone (for a short while).

...and how did they get back in
To finish what they started?


If you really want to go back to original cause, it was when the grub AiA became Admin, who then handed over to the loser AnimalMother, then back to AiA, then Super Nova, then skippy, then BO and then Bobby, the last three being ban happy idiots, but I do concede Bobby was given a hospital pass.


And you're utterly obsessed with PA. Like, pathologically.

So much so you threw everyone who could still tolerate you under the bus to claw your way back to being the king of that dump.

And now you have nobody ... and nobody goes there.

And you ... king of all you survey.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Ja-Sindarin on Dec 8th, 2023 at 8:16am
Ok. But it was still 'kicking along' regardless.
But it was Redmond Neck who really sunk the ship, no?

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 8th, 2023 at 8:25am

Aussie wrote on Dec 8th, 2023 at 8:05am:

Jasin wrote on Dec 8th, 2023 at 7:53am:
Maybe the damage was done by the Mongs.
As if they left a dirty dump that lingered long,
even though they were gone (for a short while).

...and how did they get back in
To finish what they started?


If you really want to go back to original cause, it was when the grub AiA became Admin, who then handed over to the loser AnimalMother, then back to AiA, then Super Nova, then skippy, then BO and then Bobby, the last three being ban happy idiots, but I do concede Bobby was given a hospital pass.



We had Monk - a quarrelsome drunk,
Smith whose only comments were to call everyone an idiot,
Aussie - a troublemaker,
who else?

yes - I did have a hospital pass so I tried to clean the place up.
Then Redmond got it - he couldn't do much -
then Aussie got and it's almost died now.





Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 8th, 2023 at 8:39am
None of those ELs had a clue as to what PA was. THAT is why it died.

In the age of Twitter, FaceBook and all the other social media you need to concentrate on providing a stimulating environment with plenty of informed debate.

Booby killed PA, Booby is killing the Environment MRB. Idiot is posting more in Relationshits than his own board and his one active topic is an off topic thread.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Aussie on Dec 8th, 2023 at 9:09am

mothra wrote on Dec 8th, 2023 at 8:14am:

Aussie wrote on Dec 8th, 2023 at 8:05am:

Jasin wrote on Dec 8th, 2023 at 7:53am:
Maybe the damage was done by the Mongs.
As if they left a dirty dump that lingered long,
even though they were gone (for a short while).

...and how did they get back in
To finish what they started?


If you really want to go back to original cause, it was when the grub AiA became Admin, who then handed over to the loser AnimalMother, then back to AiA, then Super Nova, then skippy, then BO and then Bobby, the last three being ban happy idiots, but I do concede Bobby was given a hospital pass.


And you're utterly obsessed with PA. Like, pathologically.

So much so you threw everyone who could still tolerate you under the bus to claw your way back to being the king of that dump.

And now you have nobody ... and nobody goes there.

And you ... king of all you survey.


"Like," when did you get your degree in psychiatry, Motor Mouth?

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Super Nova on Dec 8th, 2023 at 2:44pm

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 9:39pm:
   Neferti passed away and ...


I am so sorry to read that. I missed that news if it was posted.

RIP Nef and thank you for your online friendship.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 8th, 2023 at 2:47pm
I never saw it posted anywhere, unlike with cods, but with her medical condition it is the most likely reason she is no longer on line.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 8th, 2023 at 2:54pm
Nef was very partisan, did not like me because I didn’t support the Liberal Party. Out of all the time spent on PA and here we had one period, of an hour or two where we had a nice, friendly chat, about collecting items.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Ja-Sindarin on Dec 8th, 2023 at 6:48pm

Super Nova wrote on Dec 8th, 2023 at 2:44pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 7th, 2023 at 9:39pm:
   Neferti passed away and ...


I am so sorry to read that. I missed that news if it was posted.

RIP Nef and thank you for your online friendship.

Yes. Will miss Nef

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by John Smith on Dec 8th, 2023 at 8:32pm

Aussie wrote on Dec 8th, 2023 at 9:09am:

mothra wrote on Dec 8th, 2023 at 8:14am:

Aussie wrote on Dec 8th, 2023 at 8:05am:

Jasin wrote on Dec 8th, 2023 at 7:53am:
Maybe the damage was done by the Mongs.
As if they left a dirty dump that lingered long,
even though they were gone (for a short while).

...and how did they get back in
To finish what they started?


If you really want to go back to original cause, it was when the grub AiA became Admin, who then handed over to the loser AnimalMother, then back to AiA, then Super Nova, then skippy, then BO and then Bobby, the last three being ban happy idiots, but I do concede Bobby was given a hospital pass.


And you're utterly obsessed with PA. Like, pathologically.

So much so you threw everyone who could still tolerate you under the bus to claw your way back to being the king of that dump.

And now you have nobody ... and nobody goes there.

And you ... king of all you survey.


"Like," when did you get your degree in psychiatry, Motor Mouth?


One doesn't need to be a arborist to recognise a tree.  ::)

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Ja-Sindarin on Dec 8th, 2023 at 10:56pm
I must say.
I'm a bit embarrassed that this Election has been somewhat boring. My apologies.
No drama on the high seas, no bannings, no deletion of Topic, no fighting, even Brian hasn't set the Topic on fire.

Oh well. We mustn't let things be 'extreme' all the time, I guess.

Thankyou for the votes.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Ja-Sindarin on Dec 9th, 2023 at 2:59pm
Thankyou to my 12th Voter.  :)
Feeling like a Merry Christmas right now.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 10th, 2023 at 4:17pm
{Sigh}

Looks like another big board is going to be Modded by a cretin.

We have seen how Booby has totally but totally stuffed “Environment” and now, it appears, another idiot is going to stuff this board.

I don’t really care, to be honest.

Hate is rampant throughout this forum so if the idiot Jaye stuffs Extremism Exposed—well, who the hell cares?

There will be no extremism exposed, like none was with, errr, whatshisname Modding this board.

Environment was an important board until an imbecile was elected as its Mod. Now it is a cut price “Critters and Gardens” MRB with some crap from lees happening now and then.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Aussie on Dec 10th, 2023 at 4:35pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 10th, 2023 at 4:17pm:
{Sigh}

Looks like another big board is going to be Modded by a cretin.

We have seen how Booby has totally but totally stuffed “Environment” and now, it appears, another idiot is going to stuff this board.

I don’t really care, to be honest.

Hate is rampant throughout this forum so if the idiot Jaye stuffs Extremism Exposed—well, who the hell cares?

There will be no extremism exposed, like none was with, errr, whatshisname Modding this board.

Environment was an important board until an imbecile was elected as its Mod. Now it is a cut price “Critters and Gardens” MRB with some crap from lees happening now and then.


So why did you campaign for and sponsor the hate filed Agnes who bans people because she thinks they are awful to her?

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 10th, 2023 at 4:37pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 10th, 2023 at 4:17pm:
{Sigh}

Looks like another big board is going to be Modded by a cretin.

We have seen how Booby has totally but totally stuffed “Environment” and now, it appears, another idiot is going to stuff this board.

I don’t really care, to be honest.

Hate is rampant throughout this forum so if the idiot Jaye stuffs Extremism Exposed—well, who the hell cares?

There will be no extremism exposed, like none was with, errr, whatshisname Modding this board.

Environment was an important board until an imbecile was elected as its Mod. Now it is a cut price “Critters and Gardens” MRB with some crap from lees happening now and then.



Monk - just stick to Cats and Critters - that's all you're qualified to moderate.    ::)

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 10th, 2023 at 4:50pm
YOUR main activity in the “Environment” MRB has been posting stupid cats and dogs etc YouTubes, right?

That shit is off topic in Environment, right?

Your post count is WAY behind Relationshits and EE, right?


So what have I got wrong, Booby?

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 10th, 2023 at 5:02pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 10th, 2023 at 4:50pm:
YOUR main activity in the “Environment” MRB has been posting stupid cats and dogs etc YouTubes, right?

That shit is off topic in Environment, right?

Your post count is WAY behind Relationshits and EE, right?


So what have I got wrong, Bobby?



BTW - did Socks make it through the Antarctic blasts of Winter cold?
Was she shivering on some nights?
Did she have to sleep on your bed with a blanket over her to stay warm?
She is OK isn't she?

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 10th, 2023 at 5:08pm
YOUR main activity in the “Environment” MRB has been posting stupid cats and dogs etc YouTubes, right?

That poo is off topic in Environment, right?

Your post count is WAY behind Relationshits and EE, right?


So what have I got wrong, Booby?

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 10th, 2023 at 5:11pm
No answer.  :-?

So Socks didn't make it.   :'(

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 10th, 2023 at 5:13pm
YOUR main activity in the “Environment” MRB has been posting stupid cats and dogs etc YouTubes, right?

That poo is off topic in Environment, right?

Your post count is WAY behind Relationshits and EE, right?


So what have I got wrong, Booby?

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 10th, 2023 at 5:19pm

Hypothermia.   :'(  :'(  :'(

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 10th, 2023 at 5:21pm
YOUR main activity in the “Environment” MRB has been posting stupid cats and dogs etc YouTubes, right?

That poo is off topic in Environment, right?

Your post count is WAY behind Relationshits and EE, right?


So what have I got wrong, Booby?

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by John Smith on Dec 10th, 2023 at 5:22pm

Bobby. wrote on Dec 10th, 2023 at 5:19pm:
Hypothermia.   :'(  :'(  :'(



That might explain your stupidity in winter, but you're just as stupid in summer so I don't think you can blame hypothermia

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 10th, 2023 at 5:33pm

John Smith wrote on Dec 10th, 2023 at 5:22pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 10th, 2023 at 5:19pm:
Hypothermia.   :'(  :'(  :'(



That might explain your stupidity in winter, but you're just as stupid in summer so I don't think you can blame hypothermia



The roaring 40s refers to the latitude of between 40 and 50 degrees South
in the Southern hemisphere.
Hobart falls right inside it at 43 degrees South.

Here we find the results of the continuous circumpolar currents and wind
which are due to the Earth's rotation and circulate around the South pole or Antarctica -
causing unusually cold and windy conditions especially when there
are Southern winds straight from Antarctica.

It's no place for an old man and of course not ideal for a dog with a tropical coat.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by A.I. on Dec 10th, 2023 at 5:53pm
I must say, what a well behaved Topic, most of the way.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by John Smith on Dec 10th, 2023 at 5:55pm

Bobby. wrote on Dec 10th, 2023 at 5:33pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 10th, 2023 at 5:22pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 10th, 2023 at 5:19pm:
Hypothermia.   :'(  :'(  :'(



That might explain your stupidity in winter, but you're just as stupid in summer so I don't think you can blame hypothermia




The roaring 40s refers to the latitude of between 40 and 50 degrees South
in the Southern hemisphere.
Hobart falls right inside it at 43 degrees South.

Here we find the results of the continuous circumpolar currents and wind
which are due to the Earth's rotation and circulate around the South pole or Antarctica -
causing unusually cold and windy conditions especially when there
are Southern winds straight from Antarctica.

It's no place for an old man and of course not ideal for a dog with a tropical coat.


Yes Goober, I can google to.  But there's no need,  we've already determined that hypothermia isn't the cause of your stupidity. 

Were you dropped on your head as a baby perchance?

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 10th, 2023 at 6:10pm

Monk and Smith -
you only found out about the roaring 40s because of me -
that's the only reason.

Without me every wise guy skull would take a piece of your arse.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2fWRgzEofzA

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Aussie on Dec 10th, 2023 at 6:15pm

Bobby. wrote on Dec 10th, 2023 at 5:33pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 10th, 2023 at 5:22pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 10th, 2023 at 5:19pm:
Hypothermia.   :'(  :'(  :'(





That might explain your stupidity in winter, but you're just as stupid in summer so I don't think you can blame hypothermia



The roaring 40s refers to the latitude of between 40 and 50 degrees South
in the Southern hemisphere.
Hobart falls right inside it at 43 degrees South.

Here we find the results of the continuous circumpolar currents and wind
which are due to the Earth's rotation and circulate around the South pole or Antarctica -
causing unusually cold and windy conditions especially when there
are Southern winds straight from Antarctica.

It's no place for an old man and of course not ideal for a dog with a tropical coat.


Monk is not in Hobart, Bobby.  From what he has posted in open, he is near to and south of 41°26′31″S.

Still, in the Roaring 40s zone.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 10th, 2023 at 6:25pm

Bobby. wrote on Dec 10th, 2023 at 6:10pm:
Monk and Smith -
you only found out about the roaring 40s because of me -
that's the only reason.

Without me every wise guy skull would take a piece of your arse.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2fWRgzEofzA


Nah, I finished high school you see, so I KNEW what the west coast of Tassie is like. YOU, in Melbum, get hit by the roaring 40s MUCH more than me, moron! You have been told this more than once too!

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Aussie on Dec 10th, 2023 at 6:27pm
Monk, you are in the Roaring 40s zone.  Why deny it?

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 10th, 2023 at 7:27pm
Wow, associate with idiots and your IQ drops 20 points!

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 10th, 2023 at 8:35pm

Aussie wrote on Dec 10th, 2023 at 6:27pm:
Monk, you are in the Roaring 40s zone.  Why deny it?



We get a taste of it in Melbourne from the Southerlies but
a member here is right in the middle of it.
He must be one tough guy. 

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 11th, 2023 at 9:26pm

JaSin winning:

12 to 5 for JaSin with 1 day and 8 hours to go.


Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by A.I. on Dec 11th, 2023 at 9:38pm
And a Running Commentary Topic that hasn't had Members banned from or the Topic deleted itself.

Worth a vote in itself.  ;)

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Baronvonrort on Dec 11th, 2023 at 9:59pm

Bobby. wrote on Dec 11th, 2023 at 9:26pm:
JaSin winning:

12 to 5 for JaSin with 1 day and 8 hours to go.


If Jasin doesn't win this he will be robbed.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by A.I. on Dec 11th, 2023 at 10:31pm
;D

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 12th, 2023 at 5:09am

Bobby. wrote on Dec 10th, 2023 at 5:33pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 10th, 2023 at 5:22pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 10th, 2023 at 5:19pm:
Hypothermia.   :'(  :'(  :'(



That might explain your stupidity in winter, but you're just as stupid in summer so I don't think you can blame hypothermia



The roaring 40s refers to the latitude of between 40 and 50 degrees South
in the Southern hemisphere.
Hobart falls right inside it at 43 degrees South.

Here we find the results of the continuous circumpolar currents and wind
which are due to the Earth's rotation and circulate around the South pole or Antarctica -
causing unusually cold and windy conditions especially when there
are Southern winds straight from Antarctica.

It's no place for an old man and of course not ideal for a dog with a tropical coat.


You are an idiot and a troll, aren’t you Booby?

The circumpolar current is WELL south of Tassie!

The roaring 40s hit Melbourne but not the east coast of Tassie.

You have been told this many times so you are either extremely stupid or just a troll with no saving graces. I think you are both.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 12th, 2023 at 5:59am

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 5:09am:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 10th, 2023 at 5:33pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 10th, 2023 at 5:22pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 10th, 2023 at 5:19pm:
Hypothermia.   :'(  :'(  :'(



That might explain your stupidity in winter, but you're just as stupid in summer so I don't think you can blame hypothermia



The roaring 40s refers to the latitude of between 40 and 50 degrees South
in the Southern hemisphere.
Hobart falls right inside it at 43 degrees South.

Here we find the results of the continuous circumpolar currents and wind
which are due to the Earth's rotation and circulate around the South pole or Antarctica -
causing unusually cold and windy conditions especially when there
are Southern winds straight from Antarctica.

It's no place for an old man and of course not ideal for a dog with a tropical coat.


You are an idiot and a troll, aren’t you Bobby?

The circumpolar current is WELL south of Tassie!

The roaring 40s hit Melbourne but not the east coast of Tassie.

You have been told this many times so you are either extremely stupid or just a troll with no saving graces. I think you are both.



Tassie is but a speck in the vast Southern ocean.

forgiven
namaste





Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 12th, 2023 at 6:47am
Who cares you moron?

London is at 51°N yet England exists and England is where the staghound breed was created! One of the breeds forming the staghound is the greyhound.

Staghounds and greyhounds still flourish in the UK proving you are an uneducated idiot who spends his time here trolling and doxxing etc.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 12th, 2023 at 6:50am
Unless Brian has something up his sleeve for the last minute it looks like two boards here will be modded by idiots.

Environment has failed in terms of post count and post quality.

EE was failing under Gordon, will fail more under Jaye who will not last 6 months as Mod I reckon. A big mouth with nothing to back that up.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 12th, 2023 at 6:52am

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 6:47am:
Who cares you moron?

London is at 51°N yet England exists and England is where the staghound breed was created! One of the breeds forming the staghound is the greyhound.

Staghounds and greyhounds still flourish in the UK proving you are an uneducated idiot who spends his time here trolling and doxxing etc.



Tassie is but a speck in the vast Southern ocean.

forgiven
namaste



Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 12th, 2023 at 7:28am
Tassie is close to the mainland of Australia, it is 5500Km weatherwise from Antarctica (cue Booby posting his meaningless line in Google Earth) and is south of the mainland so is a bit cooler.

No roaring forties and the cirumpolar current is nowhere near Tassie. And your own fucking map shows that Tassie is NOT in the Southern Ocean! What a clown {shakes head}

Booby proves every day what an idiot he is.

Socks is fine, I am fine.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 12th, 2023 at 7:33am

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 7:28am:
Tassie is close to the mainland of Australia, it is 5500Km weatherwise from Antarctica (cue Bobby posting his meaningless line in Google Earth) and is south of the mainland so is a bit cooler.

No roaring forties and the cirumpolar current is nowhere near Tassie. And your own fucking map shows that Tassie is NOT in the Southern Ocean! What a clown {shakes head}

Bobby proves every day what an idiot he is.

Socks is fine, I am fine.



That's a lie.

Hobart is 2,645 km from the land mass of Antarctica.


Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 12th, 2023 at 8:44am
Told you you would post that stupid, meaningless line.

“weatherwise” we are 5500Km from Antarctica.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Aussie on Dec 12th, 2023 at 9:54am

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 7:28am:
Tassie is close to the mainland of Australia, it is 5500Km weatherwise from Antarctica (cue Booby posting his meaningless line in Google Earth) and is south of the mainland so is a bit cooler.

No roaring forties and the cirumpolar current is nowhere near Tassie. And your own fucking map shows that Tassie is NOT in the Southern Ocean! What a clown {shakes head}

Booby proves every day what an idiot he is.

Socks is fine, I am fine.


Get a second opinion.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 12th, 2023 at 10:43am
See a shrink Shonk.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by A.I. on Dec 12th, 2023 at 1:21pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 6:50am:
Unless Brian has something up his sleeve for the last minute it looks like two boards here will be modded by idiots.

Environment has failed in terms of post count and post quality.

EE was failing under Gordon, will fail more under Jaye who will not last 6 months as Mod I reckon. A big mouth with nothing to back that up.

Shut your cakehole you moron.
Majority of the Topics you post don't even relate to the theme of your Board.  :P
Go back to your Pussy-Critter Board.  ;D

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 12th, 2023 at 1:26pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 8:44am:
Told you you would post that stupid, meaningless line.

“weatherwise” we are 5500Km from Antarctica.



You were banned once for that lie and yet still you continue it.

That's evidence that you're a compulsive liar.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by A.I. on Dec 12th, 2023 at 1:33pm
He knows he's a compulsive liar.
He just doesn't care and enjoys the fact that nothing is done or can be done to him regarding his blathering lies.
Thus he continues, on purpose, with his lies.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 12th, 2023 at 1:40pm

Jasin wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 1:33pm:
He knows he's a compulsive liar.
He just doesn't care and enjoys the fact that nothing is done or can be done to him regarding his blathering lies.
Thus he continues, on purpose, with his lies.



He does it to troll the members here.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 12th, 2023 at 1:54pm

Bobby. wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 1:26pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 8:44am:
Told you you would post that stupid, meaningless line.

“weatherwise” we are 5500Km from Antarctica.



You were banned once for that lie and yet still you continue it.

That's evidence that you're a compulsive liar.


It is not a lie, cretin. You just don’t understand what I am saying. That is because you are stupid with an IQ below 90.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by A.I. on Dec 12th, 2023 at 2:03pm

Bobby. wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 1:40pm:

Jasin wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 1:33pm:
He knows he's a compulsive liar.
He just doesn't care and enjoys the fact that nothing is done or can be done to him regarding his blathering lies.
Thus he continues, on purpose, with his lies.



He does it to troll the members here.

That's all he has to offer - to Troll.
It's his entertainment to annoy other Members.
Nothing but blatherings, lies and more blatherings.
He really is a bore to be honest.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 12th, 2023 at 2:18pm

Jasin wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 2:03pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 1:40pm:

Jasin wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 1:33pm:
He knows he's a compulsive liar.
He just doesn't care and enjoys the fact that nothing is done or can be done to him regarding his blathering lies.
Thus he continues, on purpose, with his lies.



He does it to troll the members here.

That's all he has to offer - to Troll.
It's his entertainment to annoy other Members.
Nothing but blatherings, lies and more blatherings.
He really is a bore to be honest.



He needs to repent or he won't go to heaven.


Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by A.I. on Dec 12th, 2023 at 2:27pm
He'll never repent. He enjoys yanking your chain, thinking he will. You know that.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 12th, 2023 at 2:28pm
Booby doing his usual trolling.

I love the bits where he pretends to be a christian because he definitely is not a christian.

Of course, the sub90 IQ cretin’s trolling just confirms me in keeping him banned from my fine forum and MRB.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by John Smith on Dec 12th, 2023 at 3:33pm

Bobby. wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 1:26pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 8:44am:
Told you you would post that stupid, meaningless line.

“weatherwise” we are 5500Km from Antarctica.



You were banned once for that lie and yet still you continue it.

That's evidence that you're a compulsive liar.



Not only were yo stupid enough to ban him for that, but you're stupid enough to boast about it after the fact :D :D

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 12th, 2023 at 3:39pm

John Smith wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 3:33pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 1:26pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 8:44am:
Told you you would post that stupid, meaningless line.

“weatherwise” we are 5500Km from Antarctica.



You were banned once for that lie and yet still you continue it.

That's evidence that you're a compulsive liar.



Not only were yo stupid enough to ban him for that, but you're stupid enough to boast about it after the fact :D :D



He's a compulsive liar and was given a chance to retract his lies but he refused.


Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 12th, 2023 at 3:40pm

Jasin wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 2:27pm:
He'll never repent. He enjoys yanking your chain, thinking he will. You know that.



Then he'll face hellfire and brimstone.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 12th, 2023 at 3:57pm

John Smith wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 3:33pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 1:26pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 8:44am:
Told you you would post that stupid, meaningless line.

“weatherwise” we are 5500Km from Antarctica.



You were banned once for that lie and yet still you continue it.

That's evidence that you're a compulsive liar.



Not only were yo stupid enough to ban him for that, but you're stupid enough to boast about it after the fact :D :D

He is such a complete moron that he still has not noticed the “weatherwise” qualification of the distance I am from Antarctica.

His line is way bodgy anyway.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 12th, 2023 at 4:17pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 3:57pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 3:33pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 1:26pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 8:44am:
Told you you would post that stupid, meaningless line.

“weatherwise” we are 5500Km from Antarctica.



You were banned once for that lie and yet still you continue it.

That's evidence that you're a compulsive liar.



Not only were yo stupid enough to ban him for that, but you're stupid enough to boast about it after the fact :D :D

He is such a complete moron that he still has not noticed the “weatherwise” qualification of the distance I am from Antarctica.

His line is way bodgy anyway.





Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 12th, 2023 at 4:20pm
You are a homosexual so hell awaits you, Booby?

Hmm and you are a liar and thief too!

Down into the pit of fire with you!

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 12th, 2023 at 4:23pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 4:20pm:
You are a homosexual so hell awaits you, Booby?

Hmm and you are a liar and thief too!

Down into the pit of fire with you!



You are on the list -

Drunks,
liars,
thieves,
Atheists,

hell awaits you unless you repent.



Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 12th, 2023 at 4:36pm
Homosexual
Liar
Thief

You are going STRAIGHT to Hell! {Sizzle!}

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 12th, 2023 at 4:48pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 4:36pm:
Homosexual
Liar
Thief

You are going STRAIGHT to Hell! {Sizzle!}



dear Drunk,
You are describing yourself - not me.   ::)

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 12th, 2023 at 5:15pm
Homosexual
Liar
Thief

You are going STRAIGHT to Hell! {Sizzle!}

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by A.I. on Dec 12th, 2023 at 5:23pm
Looks like Monk has roped Bobby in for another night of 'lovers quarrel' as usual.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by John Smith on Dec 12th, 2023 at 5:23pm

Bobby. wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 3:39pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 3:33pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 1:26pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 8:44am:
Told you you would post that stupid, meaningless line.

“weatherwise” we are 5500Km from Antarctica.



You were banned once for that lie and yet still you continue it.

That's evidence that you're a compulsive liar.



Not only were yo stupid enough to ban him for that, but you're stupid enough to boast about it after the fact :D :D



He's a compulsive liar and was given a chance to retract his lies but he refused.


You're a compulsive cretin

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 12th, 2023 at 5:47pm
With an IQ of under 90, yup a compulsive cretin.

Booby NEVER stops with the trolling, getting tiresome.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 12th, 2023 at 6:15pm
Notice the “tropical dog” making a return?

Greyhound—English breed, half of the heritage of the staghound

Staghound—English breed, some have the thin fur of the greyhound.

Staghounds and greyhounds are still popular dogs in England and colder areas in the US etc. London is at latitude 51°N!

So where the hell does the cretin come off calling Socks a “tropical dog” at every possible opportunity?

Whippets—Greyhound v Jack Russell cross are another popular English breed, have a coat often thinner than Socks’ FFS!

All of this has been pointed out to the cretin more than once. He doesn’t care, wants to troll is all.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 12th, 2023 at 6:50pm
Socks is a tropical dog.



Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by A.I. on Dec 12th, 2023 at 7:53pm
Heading down the home straight.

Best of luck Brian.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by John Smith on Dec 12th, 2023 at 8:11pm
[quote author=bobbythebat1 link=1701808257/151#151 [/quote]


You're a moron.  Imagine thinking the UK is in the tropics.

Just how stupid are you? :D

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 12th, 2023 at 8:16pm
His IQ is clearly below 90.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 12th, 2023 at 8:16pm

John Smith wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 8:11pm:
You're a moron.  Imagine thinking the UK is in the tropics.

Just how stupid are you? :D




Polar dogs - Arctic or Antarctic:





Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 12th, 2023 at 8:30pm
Jesus! Weatherwise I am 5500Km from the Antarctic.

England is much closer to the Arctic than Tassie is to the Antarctic.

A husky etc would be heat stressed here right now.

If I were you, Booby, I would be looking to buy a brain.


Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 12th, 2023 at 8:55pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 8:30pm:
Jesus! Weatherwise I am 5500Km from the Antarctic.

England is much closer to the Arctic than Tassie is to the Antarctic.

A husky etc would be heat stressed right now.

If I were you, Bobby, I would be looking to buy a brain.



2,645 kms from the Antarctic continent -
a lot closer in Winter when the sea ice extends for 100s of kms -
Hobart is subject to the cold circumpolar current and winds but
Tassie can get very hot in summer for 3 months or so.

It would be a frightening thing to fly due South in Winter
on say the 22nd of June from Hobart.
Even at around lunchtime you'd be flying into total darkness.
At the edge of the Antarctic continent the sun only comes just above
the Northern horizon for about 3 hours at around 11am to 2 pm.
That's at about 66 degrees South latitude.
At the South Pole it would be totally dark.



Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 12th, 2023 at 9:00pm
Sigh.

Hobart is NOT in the Antarctic circumpolar current. I do not live in Hobart.

Weatherwise my distance from Antarctica is 5500Km. Your line is a bodgy piece of meaningless crap.

Socks is an English breed, not a tropical one.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by John Smith on Dec 12th, 2023 at 9:04pm

Bobby. wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 8:16pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 8:11pm:
You're a moron.  Imagine thinking the UK is in the tropics.

Just how stupid are you? :D




Polar dogs - Arctic or Antarctic:






Just how stupid do you have to be to think the UK is in the tropics? Dumber than dogshit, and that's exactly how stupid you are.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 12th, 2023 at 9:10pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 9:00pm:
Sigh.

Hobart is NOT in the Antarctic circumpolar current. I do not live in Hobart.

Weatherwise my distance from Antarctica is 5500Km. Your line is a bodgy piece of meaningless crap.

Socks is an English breed, not a tropical one.



Try Google Earth yourself - you stupid boy - click on the ruler symbol.

https://earth.google.com




Hobart_to_Antarctic.jpg (184 KB | 5 )

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 12th, 2023 at 9:19pm
“Weatherwise” idiot!

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 12th, 2023 at 9:21pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 9:19pm:
“Weatherwise” idiot!



There is no such thing as a Weatherwise measurement of kilometers.

You make up lies and then invent new ideas to cover your arse.
I'm not buying into your lies -
you'll be called out every time you do it.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Super Nova on Dec 12th, 2023 at 9:24pm

Jasin wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 5:23pm:
Looks like Monk has roped Bobby in for another night of 'lovers quarrel' as usual.


If we all throw in 10 quid we could get a room for them.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 12th, 2023 at 9:30pm

Super Nova wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 9:24pm:

Jasin wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 5:23pm:
Looks like Monk has roped Bobby in for another night of 'lovers quarrel' as usual.


If we all throw in 10 quid we could get a room for them.



No - instead - just watch Monk get demolished night after night
as I pick his lies apart.   ;D

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 12th, 2023 at 9:35pm

Bobby. wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 9:21pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 9:19pm:
“Weatherwise” idiot!



There is no such thing as a Weatherwise measurement of kilometers.

You make up lies and then invent new ideas to cover your arse.
I'm not buying into your lies -
you'll be called out every time you do it.

LOL

You are so stupid you can’t understand simple concepts.

Weatherwise I am 5500Km from Antarctica.

Socks is of an English breed, as are greyhounds and whippets, not tropical.

Oh, 1 + 1 = 2

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 12th, 2023 at 9:44pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 9:00pm:
Sigh.

Hobart is NOT in the Antarctic circumpolar current. I do not live in Hobart.

Weatherwise my distance from Antarctica is 5500Km.
Your line is a bodgy piece of meaningless crap.

Socks is an English breed, not a tropical one.



A lie is exposed.

Try Google Earth yourself - you stupid boy - click on the ruler symbol.

https://earth.google.com









Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 12th, 2023 at 9:46pm
{Sigh}

Weatherwise I am 5500Km from Antarctica.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 12th, 2023 at 9:57pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 9:46pm:
{Sigh}

Weatherwise I am 5500Km from Antarctica.



Monk,
just apologise -
we'll all forgive you.  :)

namaste

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by John Smith on Dec 12th, 2023 at 10:00pm

Bobby. wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 9:30pm:

Super Nova wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 9:24pm:

Jasin wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 5:23pm:
Looks like Monk has roped Bobby in for another night of 'lovers quarrel' as usual.


If we all throw in 10 quid we could get a room for them.



No - instead - just watch Monk get demolished night after night
as I pick his lies apart.   ;D


;D ;D
Is that what you tell yourself you are doing?

Why do you run away Goober? Is the UK in the tropics  or not? Surely it's not a difficult question even for a moron like you.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 12th, 2023 at 10:14pm

John Smith wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 10:00pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 9:30pm:

Super Nova wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 9:24pm:

Jasin wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 5:23pm:
Looks like Monk has roped Bobby in for another night of 'lovers quarrel' as usual.


If we all throw in 10 quid we could get a room for them.



No - instead - just watch Monk get demolished night after night
as I pick his lies apart.   ;D


;D ;D
Is that what you tell yourself you are doing?

Why do you run away Goober? Is the UK in the tropics  or not? Surely it's not a difficult question even for a moron like you.



You halfwit - short haired breeds are often bred in the UK -
so what? - they have special jumpers for them to wear outside.    ::)

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 12th, 2023 at 10:15pm

Polar dogs - Arctic or Antarctic:







Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 13th, 2023 at 4:31am
Weatherwise I am 5500Km from the Antarctic.

A husky would be suffering heat stress here right now.

You are wrong as usual.

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by John Smith on Dec 13th, 2023 at 6:03am

Bobby. wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 10:14pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 10:00pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 9:30pm:

Super Nova wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 9:24pm:

Jasin wrote on Dec 12th, 2023 at 5:23pm:
Looks like Monk has roped Bobby in for another night of 'lovers quarrel' as usual.


If we all throw in 10 quid we could get a room for them.



No - instead - just watch Monk get demolished night after night
as I pick his lies apart.   ;D


;D ;D
Is that what you tell yourself you are doing?

Why do you run away Goober? Is the UK in the tropics  or not? Surely it's not a difficult question even for a moron like you.



You halfwit - short haired breeds are often bred in the UK -
so what? - they have special jumpers for them to wear outside.    ::)



look here moron, you're the stupid crunt who keeps saying monks dog is a 'tropical dog',

it's fairly simple. A yes or no answer will do,
IS THE UK IN THE TROPICS OR NOT?

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 13th, 2023 at 6:38am
I have never seen Sock shiver from cold.

Face it Booby—not only are you an idiot your graceless refusal to admit mistake makes you look about 8 years old.

You frequently make a stupid statement without any thought beforehand then keep pretending you are right.

I really hope FD will, once board amalgamation is done, look to quality of boards. The experiment of having an idiot Mod a big board has not proved successful, has it? Your only active thread is one that belongs in my MRB!

Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by Bobby. on Dec 13th, 2023 at 7:10am

Congratulations to JaSin - our new moderator.      :)


Title: Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Post by A.I. on Dec 13th, 2023 at 12:29pm
Thankyou and I shall lock this Topic as I think Bobby and Monk need to get a room instead.  :D

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.