Stephen Fry attacked for his Christmas speech in UK.
https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/other/woke-leaders-posing-as-moral-superiors-exposed-as-real-lowlifes/ar-AA1mb0k5?ocid=msedgntp&pc=ACTS&cvid=eb80b93fe5f1466fb96d2a3212f8cee1&ei=13

https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/other/woke-leaders-posing-as-moral-superiors-exposed-as-real-lowlifes/ar-AA1mb0k5?cvid=9a6f8b6c10f64b52afbb11388b35966c&ocid=winp2fptaskbar&ei=9

Might stir some of them - wake them up - to come after me to be vanquished....

It's amazing that such a dire situation is simply ignored by our local heroes ....

The Woke Left are the Whities in servitude to Africa.
As is Islam and Aborigines.
Africa has its white slaves now and they're falling away in their violent inabilities to hold onto something they've betrayed for so long.

The New York Times, well known as a predominantly left-leaning paper published a devastating feature about the weaponisation of sexual violence by Hamas.

This long-form feature is the result of interviews with more than 150 people, including survivors and witnesses to the slaughter of October 7. It cites first-hand accounts and multiple primary sources, and meticulously explains how facts were verified. I don’t know how they managed. I could barely get through it. Their words dripped with grief, measured yet urgent with the weight of responsibility. The cadence of every line whispered: the world must know, the world must know.

Reading the responses to this article were an exercise in despair. Almost all expressed horror at the savagery of what had been documented, and thanked the reporters and the paper for bearing witness. Many more concurrently dived into the filthy waters of moral equivalence; this was savage and barbaric, they said. But, also, Israel sort of deserved it.

I realised in that moment there is a bloodstained thread that bound Ryvchin’s book to the article and the comments that followed. Denial. Denial of truth. Denial of facts. Denial that a moral centre has been violated.

I see no difference in the societal elites who centuries ago concocted the most ridiculous blood libel tales to violently enact pogroms on Jews across Europe and those who today are responding to the unthinkable sexual violence of Hamas with, well, Israel really is the oppressor.  Surely this thinking is a kind of sickness?

The NYT report details verified images of women’s corpses with nails driven into their thighs and groins. It verified a video showing two dead female IDF soldiers who had been shot directly into their vaginas. They interviewed a survivor who, hidden and feigning death, watched Hamas fighters mutilate a woman’s breasts while she was being raped.

I don’t want to go on, to keep recounting these horrors, but we must, as long as there are still people whose response is conditional. Who respond with, yes … but.

...

French-Israeli hostage Mia Schem has given details of her ordeal during her 54 days held in Gaza. She was held captive by a Palestinian family. She talks of being confused – why is there a woman here? Why is there a family here? Then the penny dropped.

The same media that have been so swift, say, to believe all women, believe any woman who says anything about sexual violence, published an insulting disclaimer to Schem’s words, saying her account was yet to be verified. By all means, pop over to Gaza and ask the family that held her. I’m sure they will be honest and transparent.

Ah, but to believe Mia Schem means a brick in the protective wall of ideology comes down. Perhaps the wall itself. To deny her story is to stay in the same cocoon that refuses to accept a ceasefire, without Hamas surrender and the safe return of the still living hostages, is a fool’s errand.

How many would need to completely reframe their political thinking, perhaps even parts of their identity? Mia Schem’s testimony says what history taught us. Just as not every German was a Nazi, there were many enthusiastic Nazis in German society. Not every Gazan is Hamas, but only the greatest fool would deny that a proportion of everyday Gazans are complicit. That they know where the hostages are, and are happily complicit.

Denial feels safe, but it never is. It simply postpones the inevitable pain of realising what was there all along. To the many who continue to say, oh but sexual violence has always been a weapon of war, you are in denial. You are minimising the most atrocious acts of femicide in our times.

The blood of every innocent civilian life lost in Gaza is on Hamas. Not only has it rejected every ceasefire offered, refusing to release the living hostages, it has promised it will repeat October 7 until Israel, Jews and Christians are wiped from the map. Hamas is not denying this and neither must democracies in the West.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/inquirer/maniacal-hatred-of-jews-festers-in-cocoon-of-denial/news-story/3482605dacbf3e9fdb829ddf74df9218

Jasin wrote on Dec 29^th, 2023 at 3:31pm:

Stephen Fry attacked for his Christmas speech in UK.

For this



Quote:

“What is my message this Christmas? Simple truth that we are all brothers and sisters. It's naive, but it's as good a message as any other,” Fry said.

:o :o :o


talk about concocted outrage. The retarded right are at it again :D :D :D

John Smith wrote on Jan 6^th, 2024 at 8:45am:

Jasin wrote on Dec 29th, 2023 at 3:31pm: Stephen Fry attacked for his Christmas speech in UK. For this Quote: “What is my message this Christmas? Simple truth that we are all brothers and sisters. It's naive, but it's as good a message as any other,” Fry said. :o :o :o talk about concocted outrage. The retarded right are at it again :D :D :D

The great irony of the tidal wave of anti-Jew invective that has come Stephen Fry’s way over the past 48 hours is that it has perfectly proved his point. He goes on TV to say we are witnessing a ‘rise in anti-Jewish racism’ and right away there’s a spike in anti-Jewish racism. Even before he’d finished his touching fireside homily on Jew hate, the Jew haters were out in force to ask: ‘Who the bugger does he think he is?’ A Jew on TV? At Christmas? Wanging on about the victimisation of Jews? Vomit emoji. That was literally the response of the army of arseholes that passes for the left these days, every one of them too dim to realise they were making Fry’s case for him.


Fry’s message was fair and benign. You’d have to be a frothing loon to object to it. He ‘came out’ as a Jew. He offered cold, hard facts. Since the Hamas pogrom of 7 October there have been 50 anti-Semitic incidents a day in London, he said. That’s an eye-watering 1,350 per cent rise in Jew-hate incidents. It’s the greatest rise in anti-Jewish racism in the UK since modern records began. He slammed the ‘venomous slurs’ heaped on Britain’s Jews in recent weeks. He made a plea for a return to the ‘decency’ our nation is famed for. And he ended on a note of Kumbaya. The ‘simple truth’, he said, is that ‘we are all brothers and sisters’: ‘It’s naive, but it’s as good a message as any other.’




His only openly political comment concerned the far right, who, he said, love to point out that he’s Jewish. The far right is a menace, for sure. Their Jew hate has become more brazen in recent weeks. But the greatest threat to Jews in Britain today comes not from racist oafs from the 1970s, but from radicalised sections of the Muslim community, their craven apologists in the middle class and a polite society that disguises its suspicion of Jews as criticism of Israel. Confronting both Islamist and woke anti-Semitism is the pressing task of our time. Fry should be thanked for showing us how pressing it is.

Well... in case you've missed it.   Being a Christian, is both anti Islamic, and anti semite by definition.  Just ask a Jew and a muslim.   :)

tickleandrose wrote on Jan 6^th, 2024 at 4:10pm:

Well... in case you've missed it.   Being a Christian, is both anti Islamic, and anti semite by definition.  Just ask a Jew and a muslim.   :)

And? What are you groping for?

Being an atheist lowlife lefty is anti Jew, Muslim, Christian, Hindu, aboriginal etc, etc.

https://www.spectator.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/2dc024a1af683e28d7580050bd093793.jpg


Signs of wokeness:

1. An obsession with racial and sexual identity and skin colour (even as these are themselves seen as mere social constructs); raising them, in importance, above all other attributes of humanity.

2. A pathological need to order people in complex hierarchies of ‘oppression’.

3. An aversion to demonstrations of logic and reason (a.k.a. ‘factsplaining’); indeed woke exhibits a positive relish for the illogical and emotional as more authentic and real – see ‘lived experience’ versus actual experience; note that ‘my truth’ is superior to the truth.
...

Is it too much to see wokeness as a threat equivalent to fascism? On the face of it, perhaps – until you consider those woke US university presidents in Congress who were unable to condemn calls for the genocide of Jews on campus. How did they reach that insane, dangerous position? Because wokeness subtly instructed them to think this: Jews, in the intersectional woke hierarchy, are inherently colonialist oppressors, therefore they are unworthy of the protection given to more deserving minorities. And this is also where wokeness crucially differs from fascism. Fascism is brutal and overt: it attacks from the front and it glories in its aggression. Wokeness, by contrast, is stealthy, insidious and tentacular. It corrodes from the inside out. And the corrosion is spreading, daily.

Frank wrote on Jan 11^th, 2024 at 9:31am:

https://www.spectator.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/2dc024a1af683e28d7580050bd093793.jpg Signs of wokeness: 1. An obsession with racial and sexual identity and skin colour (even as these are themselves seen as mere social constructs); raising them, in importance, above all other attributes of humanity. 2. A pathological need to order people in complex hierarchies of ‘oppression’. 3. An aversion to demonstrations of logic and reason (a.k.a. ‘factsplaining’); indeed woke exhibits a positive relish for the illogical and emotional as more authentic and real – see ‘lived experience’ versus actual experience; note that ‘my truth’ is superior to the truth. ... Is it too much to see wokeness as a threat equivalent to fascism? On the face of it, perhaps – until you consider those woke US university presidents in Congress who were unable to condemn calls for the genocide of Jews on campus. How did they reach that insane, dangerous position? Because wokeness subtly instructed them to think this: Jews, in the intersectional woke hierarchy, are inherently colonialist oppressors, therefore they are unworthy of the protection given to more deserving minorities. And this is also where wokeness crucially differs from fascism. Fascism is brutal and overt: it attacks from the front and it glories in its aggression. Wokeness, by contrast, is stealthy, insidious and tentacular. It corrodes from the inside out. And the corrosion is spreading, daily.

Frank and the option that leaves no doubt. “Oh Magoo You've Done It Again".

tickleandrose wrote on Jan 6^th, 2024 at 4:10pm:

Well... in case you've missed it.   Being a Christian, is both anti Islamic, and anti semite by definition.  Just ask a Jew and a muslim.   :)

How is 'being' something somehow 'anti' others?  How is being a Christian anti-Islamic and anti-Semitic?

Ask an Islamist and he will say everyone is against him (the women don't get a voice)... ask a Jew and he will say that some extremists are against him but mostly Islamites who want to murder him .... I think you have no idea what you are talking about.... the Islamite is responsible for his own feelings of persecution and most likely for any real persecution received - a Jew is smart enough to know the difference and not blame everyone.

As before - my DNA is 10% Jews of Europe - my grandfather's grand-parents... me mither was Cat'lic and me father Anglican.... do I sound like I give a rat's about any of that guff?

Contrary to dividie's hive mind imposition - I am a sovereign individual and make my own judgements.... as do all reasoning individuals.... and we appreciate one another.... and we reject those who seek a different way of oppression and despotism - EVEN if that despotism of of a majority as he chooses to see the UN as somehow being.....  with a group of such widely diverse individuals there is NO majority as we see it .... just a majority of different views, many of which any reasonable person would reject out of hand.... ... and no - I do not get my ideas from SkyNews - though they may get some from me!!

BTW - is the UN still talking Israel/Hamas to death or have they acted to stop it all?  I did say to dividie long ago that the UN would argue the polnt to death before deciding any action, and by then most of the dead will be dead ... and once a consensus was agreed many months after the bloodshed began - had to find the force to impose peace by going to war. 

Madness - pure madness....

.

---

wombatwoody wrote on Jan 13^th, 2024 at 4:39am:

.

https://theintercept.com/2022/10/31/social-media-disinformation-dhs/

Mr Paterson said Prime Minister Anthony Albanese should have gone to Israel as Australia’s closest allies and partners did; including the United Sates, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, the European Union and Canada.

He also highlighted the "rampant" anti-Semitism across the Western world, calling on the Prime Minister to "tackle this scourge before it becomes an absolute tragedy in our own country".

But the shadow frontbencher said it was ultimately clear the government was worried about the domestic political implications and its "pro-Palestinian supporters".

"She can't be seen to be being too sympathetic to the Jewish people, the Israeli people who died on the 7th of October," he said.

"And has to be seen to be so-called even-handed by meeting with victims of settler violence in the West Bank, which is a serious issue, but nowhere near on par of the greatest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust, which is what happened on the 7th of October.

"It’s a very disappointing thing from this government. I think they should be ashamed of the way they conduct themselves in this."

AFTER Hamas’s terror spree inside Israel on October 7, Western cities have had several months of Islamic extremists and their leftist fellow travellers brazenly parading through the streets calling for the destruction of the world’s only Jewish state. As Mark Steyn so accurately points out, those pro-Jihad marches are indicative of the effect of mass immigration from the Islamic world and the social pathologies associated with it that will have an ever-growing impact on the demographics, culture and politics of Western countries.

In alliance with the Islamists on those anti-Israel demos are certain far-left groups such as the Socialist Workers Party who are not so much apologists or sympathisers for Islamists but full-throated supporters of Jihadi terror, as we can see from their own publication.

Suella Braverman was right. These are hate marches.

Sure, there are probably plenty of useful idiots in attendance who aren’t ardent Hamas supporters or sympathisers, but the fact is there are legions who are. If you march alongside supporters and sympathisers of Hamas, you are on a hate march whatever your own motivations may be.

https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/governments-and-media-the-useful-idiots-for-hamas/

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jan 11^th, 2024 at 9:53pm:

tickleandrose wrote on Jan 6th, 2024 at 4:10pm: Well... in case you've missed it.   Being a Christian, is both anti Islamic, and anti semite by definition.  Just ask a Jew and a muslim.   :) How is 'being' something somehow 'anti' others?  How is being a Christian anti-Islamic and anti-Semitic? Ask an Islamist and he will say everyone is against him (the women don't get a voice)... ask a Jew and he will say that some extremists are against him but mostly Islamites who want to murder him .... I think you have no idea what you are talking about.... the Islamite is responsible for his own feelings of persecution and most likely for any real persecution received - a Jew is smart enough to know the difference and not blame everyone. As before - my DNA is 10% Jews of Europe - my grandfather's grand-parents... me mither was Cat'lic and me father Anglican.... do I sound like I give a rat's about any of that guff? Contrary to dividie's hive mind imposition - I am a sovereign individual and make my own judgements.... as do all reasoning individuals.... and we appreciate one another.... and we reject those who seek a different way of oppression and despotism - EVEN if that despotism of of a majority as he chooses to see the UN as somehow being.....  with a group of such widely diverse individuals there is NO majority as we see it .... just a majority of different views, many of which any reasonable person would reject out of hand.... ... and no - I do not get my ideas from SkyNews - though they may get some from me!! BTW - is the UN still talking Israel/Hamas to death or have they acted to stop it all?  I did say to dividie long ago that the UN would argue the polnt to death before deciding any action, and by then most of the dead will be dead ... and once a consensus was agreed many months after the bloodshed began - had to find the force to impose peace by going to war.  Madness - pure madness....

:)

Reading through this carp you would conclude that the right is woke if any of them knew what it meant.

Dnarever wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2024 at 6:22pm:

Reading through this carp you would conclude that the right is woke if any of them knew what it meant.

:D  :D

Oh, so there IS such a thing as woke - and it's the right that's woke!!!

That is soooo you, duck brain.

We live in an era when leftists see racism everywhere. Criticise Islam and you’re an Islamophobe. Ask someone, “Where are you from?” and you’ve committed a racial microaggression. Wonder out loud if we need to “stop the boats” and you’re basically Hitler.

The left doesn’t downplay ­racism – it exaggerates it. Crikey is a good example. It railed against the “racism” of those who voted no to the voice to parliament. It frequently frets over the media’s “anti-Muslim commentary”.

And yet when a heaving mob of extremists cried “gas the Jews”, its instinct was to investigate. To cast doubt. To ask probing questions.

Why? Here’s my view. It’s ­because the left treats anti-Jewish racism less seriously than other forms of racism.

It’s because none of the left’s woke rules apply to Jews. Witness how the progressive cry “Believe women” was likewise quietly ditched following Hamas’s brutalisation of women and girls in Israel. Don’t believe “those” women.

It’s because Jews seem always to be excluded from the moral universe of showy left-wing concern.

After that Crikey piece appeared, I saw armies of the vile ­online saying: “See, I told you all those claims of anti-Semitism were overblown.”

I have no doubt that was not Lattouf and Wilson’s intention. But it’s what happened.

And forget everything else about the Lattouf affair – it’s this that was unforgivable.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/inquirer/crikey-the-left-has-outdone-itself-with-the-lattouf-affair/news-story/cf1469d8ad6b9a1357cdc53409ce4b8d


The Left are spineless, hypochritical, bent Bbwianesque apologists.

Frank wrote on Jan 27^th, 2024 at 7:18pm:

We live in an era when leftists see racism everywhere. Criticise Islam and you’re an Islamophobe. Ask someone, “Where are you from?” and you’ve committed a racial microaggression. Wonder out loud if we need to “stop the boats” and you’re basically Hitler. The left doesn’t downplay ­racism – it exaggerates it. Crikey is a good example. It railed against the “racism” of those who voted no to the voice to parliament. It frequently frets over the media’s “anti-Muslim commentary”. And yet when a heaving mob of extremists cried “gas the Jews”, its instinct was to investigate. To cast doubt. To ask probing questions. Why? Here’s my view. It’s ­because the left treats anti-Jewish racism less seriously than other forms of racism. It’s because none of the left’s woke rules apply to Jews. Witness how the progressive cry “Believe women” was likewise quietly ditched following Hamas’s brutalisation of women and girls in Israel. Don’t believe “those” women. It’s because Jews seem always to be excluded from the moral universe of showy left-wing concern. After that Crikey piece appeared, I saw armies of the vile ­online saying: “See, I told you all those claims of anti-Semitism were overblown.” I have no doubt that was not Lattouf and Wilson’s intention. But it’s what happened. And forget everything else about the Lattouf affair – it’s this that was unforgivable. https://www.theaustralian.com.au/inquirer/crikey-the-left-has-outdone-itself-with-the-lattouf-affair/news-story/cf1469d8ad6b9a1357cdc53409ce4b8d The Left are spineless, hypochritical, bent Bbwianesque apologists.

So many words - So little sense.

Dnarever wrote on Jan 27^th, 2024 at 8:11pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 27th, 2024 at 7:18pm: We live in an era when leftists see racism everywhere. Criticise Islam and you’re an Islamophobe. Ask someone, “Where are you from?” and you’ve committed a racial microaggression. Wonder out loud if we need to “stop the boats” and you’re basically Hitler. The left doesn’t downplay ­racism – it exaggerates it. Crikey is a good example. It railed against the “racism” of those who voted no to the voice to parliament. It frequently frets over the media’s “anti-Muslim commentary”. And yet when a heaving mob of extremists cried “gas the Jews”, its instinct was to investigate. To cast doubt. To ask probing questions. Why? Here’s my view. It’s ­because the left treats anti-Jewish racism less seriously than other forms of racism. It’s because none of the left’s woke rules apply to Jews. Witness how the progressive cry “Believe women” was likewise quietly ditched following Hamas’s brutalisation of women and girls in Israel. Don’t believe “those” women. It’s because Jews seem always to be excluded from the moral universe of showy left-wing concern. After that Crikey piece appeared, I saw armies of the vile ­online saying: “See, I told you all those claims of anti-Semitism were overblown.” I have no doubt that was not Lattouf and Wilson’s intention. But it’s what happened. And forget everything else about the Lattouf affair – it’s this that was unforgivable. https://www.theaustralian.com.au/inquirer/crikey-the-left-has-outdone-itself-with-the-lattouf-affair/news-story/cf1469d8ad6b9a1357cdc53409ce4b8d The Left are spineless, hypochritical, bent Bbwianesque apologists. So many words - So little sense.

oh, sorry, duck, forgot your constrained intellectual limits:

https://media1.tenor.com/m/9PfeY8SJNkcAAAAd/duck-wiggle.gif


poo on, there's a good water fool.

Frank wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2024 at 9:56am:

Dnarever wrote on Jan 22nd, 2024 at 6:22pm: Reading through this carp you would conclude that the right is woke if any of them knew what it meant. :D  :D Oh, so there IS such a thing as woke - and it's the right that's woke!!! That is soooo you, duck brain.

Quote:

Oh, so there IS such a thing as woke

The way that the right have re defined it is more applicable to the right as clearly shown.

The Green M&M's shoes really was a big ticket right wing issue for a few months as was Dr Seuss, disney etc. Using the rights definition this was all about as woke as it gets - The little mermaid - really.

Dnarever wrote on Jan 27^th, 2024 at 8:23pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 23rd, 2024 at 9:56am: Dnarever wrote on Jan 22nd, 2024 at 6:22pm: Reading through this carp you would conclude that the right is woke if any of them knew what it meant. :D  :D Oh, so there IS such a thing as woke - and it's the right that's woke!!! That is soooo you, duck brain. Quote: Oh, so there IS such a thing as woke The way that the right have re defined it is more applicable to the right as clearly shown. The Green M&M's shoes really was a big ticket right wing issue for a few months as was Dr Seuss, disney etc. Using the rights definition this was all about as woke as it gets - The little mermaid - really.

Oh?

What is the korrekt definition, duck?

You tell us.

And don't just poo and waddle.

Frank wrote on Jan 27^th, 2024 at 8:38pm:

What is the korrekt definition, duck?

Anyone who says or does anything the retarded right don't like

John Smith wrote on Jan 27^th, 2024 at 8:55pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 27th, 2024 at 8:38pm: What is the korrekt definition, duck? Anyone who says or does anything the retarded right don't like

Ducky said that that is the right's redefinition, thick ****. Keep up (you can't, you won't).

John Smith wrote on Jan 27^th, 2024 at 8:55pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 27th, 2024 at 8:38pm: What is the korrekt definition, duck? Anyone who says or does anything the retarded right don't like

100% correct.

Dnarever wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2024 at 6:22pm:

Reading through this carp you would conclude that the right is woke if any of them knew what it meant.

Nah - that's Awake not Woke.  :o

Dnarever wrote on Jan 27^th, 2024 at 8:23pm:

The way that the right have re defined it is more applicable to the right as clearly shown. The Green M&M's shoes really was a big ticket right wing issue for a few months as was Dr Seuss, disney etc. Using the rights definition this was all about as woke as it gets - The little mermaid - really.

Never heard any of that..... apart from a few passing tales of Disney near fatal mistakes...  ooh - the Green M & M in high heel white boots... how twee... can you still get green M & Ms?

OOOOH - 'the little mermaid' was never Black...  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D ..... gorgeous woman she was - with a shock of flaming red hair!!! 

You've got to save her, Eddie!  the Weasels'll get her!! Don't say you ain't got time for Toons!!

https://i.redd.it/rldycakjfxu71.jpg

---