Another One? Trump-Hunter Letitia James Spent Thousands On Luxury Travel And All Sorts Of Other Malarkey


While Georgia Trump prosecutor Fani Willis is embroiled in Fanigate - paying her boyfriend nearly $1 million to help her 'get Trump' while he flew the two of them on (allegedly 'cash' reimbursed) lavish vacations, New York AG Letitia James has been spending tens of thousands of dollars on all sorts of personal benefits, according to a recent analysis of a recent financial disclosure by X user "Mel" (@Villagecrazylady).

The findings are damning. James spent more than $15,000 on luxury hotels in Puerto Rico, $20,000 per year in meals, $7,000 dropped at a NYC nightclub that was billed as an "office," and $84,000 in airfare to fly all over the country.

She also stayed at the Beverly Hills Wilshire, and claimed $65,000 in "reimbursements" to "campaign consultants," which as X user Jim Weed notes, "could literally be anything."


Speaking of campaign consultants, can anyone tell me why a state Attorney General would need to spend over $300,000 in a single year (2023) on campaign consultants when she *just* won re-election the previous November? What could she possibly be consulting on? Furthermore, why do these million-dollar “campaign consultancy firms” always seem to be run out of random 2-bedroom apartments?

To be clear, Ms. James isn’t breaking the law with her expenditures. But considering the high bar she set for Trump in his civil fraud case, it’s more than a little galling that she plays so fast and loose with what she deems to be “legitimate campaign expenses.” -@JimBobW49


James also spent thousands at the '48 Lounge' in NYC as a 'fundraising' expense, a venue which claims to provide a "luxurious and intimate atmosphere."


https://www.zerohedge.com/political/another-one-trump-hunter-letitia-james-spent-thousands-taxpayer-funds-luxury-travel-and

if only you set the same standards with trump, you'd realise how ridiculous you sound

John Smith wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 7:28am:

if only you set the same standards with trump, you'd realise how ridiculous you sound

That would be true if it were true, JS.

Zero Hedge is fake news. The figures are pulled out of thin air, as you do.


Quote:

Over time, Zero Hedge expanded into non-financial political content,[c] including conspiracy theories and fringe rhetoric[3][28] advancing radical right,[15][29] alt-right,[30][31][32] and pro-Russia positions.[1][33][34][35] Zero Hedge's non-financial commentary has led to multiple site bans by global social media platforms, although its 2019 Facebook ban[36][37] and 2020 Twitter ban were later reversed.[15][38] Zero Hedge in-house content is posted under the pseudonym "Tyler Durden"; the founder and main editor was identified as Daniel Ivandjiiski.[27] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_Hedge

Cunning, no?

Even if Letitia James was having an affair and is found to have been corrupt it does not make Donald Trump innocent....Another Prosecutor will be assigned and Trump will still answer for his crimes....Trump has already been found guilty!!!

::) ::) ::)

philperth2010 wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 9:06am:

Even if Letitia James was having an affair and is found to have been corrupt it does not make Donald Trump innocent....Another Prosecutor will be assigned and Trump will still answer for his crimes....Trump has already been found guilty!!! ::) ::) ::)

Found Guilty of what crime....in what criminal trial.....by what jury in a criminal trial?

Be advised, under the US Legal system, if you are going to assert it was in a Civil Trial, there is no finding of "guilt" in a civil trial.....Guilt is reserved solely for Criminal Charges, subsequent to a criminal trial.

Civil cases can only establish "liability"......Liability  where the burden of proof & validity of presented evidence is far, far lower than required to find a person "guilty" of a Crime in a criminal case/trial.

The jury in a criminal trial must unanimously find the defendant guilty of a "Crime" 'beyond all reasonable doubt.'


So, the question remains, what crime resulted finding Donald Trump "guilty", & of what "crime" was he found guilty?

"Liability" means absolutely nothing when dealing with criminal "Guilt".

Panther wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 10:16am:

philperth2010 wrote on Mar 6th, 2024 at 9:06am: Even if Letitia James was having an affair and is found to have been corrupt it does not make Donald Trump innocent....Another Prosecutor will be assigned and Trump will still answer for his crimes....Trump has already been found guilty!!! ::) ::) ::) Found Guilty of what crime....in what criminal trial.....by what jury in a criminal trial? Be advised, under the US Legal system, if you are going to assert it was in a Civil Trial, there is no finding of "guilt" in a civil trial.....Guilt is reserved solely for Criminal Charges, subsequent to a criminal trial. Civil cases can only establish "liability"......Liability  where the burden of proof & validity of presented evidence is far, far lower than required to find a person "guilty" of a Crime in a criminal case/trial. The jury in a criminal trial must unanimously find the defendant guilty 'beyond all reasonable doubt.' So, the question remains, what crime resulted finding Donald Trump "guilty", & of what "crime" was he found guilty? "Liability" means absolutely nothing when dealing with criminal "Guilt".

Come come, Panther, two of your DL's employees have been jailed.

Mike, lawyer, got three years for paying off Stormy, porn star - "pay in cash".

Allen, Chief Financial Officer, got three months for fraud.

Both were just obeying orders.

You?

Karnal wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 10:44am:

Panther wrote on Mar 6th, 2024 at 10:16am: philperth2010 wrote on Mar 6th, 2024 at 9:06am: Even if Letitia James was having an affair and is found to have been corrupt it does not make Donald Trump innocent....Another Prosecutor will be assigned and Trump will still answer for his crimes....Trump has already been found guilty!!! ::) ::) ::) Found Guilty of what crime....in what criminal trial.....by what jury in a criminal trial? Be advised, under the US Legal system, if you are going to assert it was in a Civil Trial, there is no finding of "guilt" in a civil trial.....Guilt is reserved solely for Criminal Charges, subsequent to a criminal trial. Civil cases can only establish "liability"......Liability  where the burden of proof & validity of presented evidence is far, far lower than required to find a person "guilty" of a Crime in a criminal case/trial. The jury in a criminal trial must unanimously find the defendant guilty 'beyond all reasonable doubt.' So, the question remains, what crime resulted finding Donald Trump "guilty", & of what "crime" was he found guilty? "Liability" means absolutely nothing when dealing with criminal "Guilt". Come come, Panther, two of your DL's employees have been jailed. Mike, lawyer, got three years for paying off Stormy, porn star - "pay in cash". Allen, Chief Financial Officer, got three months for fraud. Both were just obeying orders. You?

So, then we're in agreement......that he hasn't been found "guilty" 'beyond all reasonable doubt'....of a "crime" by a unanimous jury verdict, subsequent to a "Criminal Trial", to date...yes?

John Smith wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 7:28am:

if only you set the same standards with trump, you'd realise how ridiculous you sound

No I doubt that even then he would realise close to half how ridiculous he sounds.

Donald Trump has been fined for fraud once again....Trump has been ordered to pay close to half a billion dollars in fines all up so far and been banned from doing business in New York for 3 years....The DA is irrelivant to Trump's guilt....No amount of deflection or spin can change these facts!!!


Quote:

Judge orders Trump to pay $355 million for lying about his wealth in staggering civil fraud ruling NEW YORK (AP) — A New York judge ordered Donald Trump on Friday to pay $355 million in penalties, finding that the former president lied about his wealth for years in a sweeping civil fraud verdict that pierces his billionaire image but stops short of putting his real estate empire out of business.

[smiley=lolk.gif] [smiley=lolk.gif] [smiley=lolk.gif]

Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
Aldous Huxley (1894 - 1963), "Proper Studies", 1927

https://apnews.com/article/trump-civil-fraud-verdict-engoron-244024861f0df886543c157c9fc5b3e4

Panther wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 11:24am:

Karnal wrote on Mar 6th, 2024 at 10:44am: Panther wrote on Mar 6th, 2024 at 10:16am: philperth2010 wrote on Mar 6th, 2024 at 9:06am: Even if Letitia James was having an affair and is found to have been corrupt it does not make Donald Trump innocent....Another Prosecutor will be assigned and Trump will still answer for his crimes....Trump has already been found guilty!!! ::) ::) ::) Found Guilty of what crime....in what criminal trial.....by what jury in a criminal trial? Be advised, under the US Legal system, if you are going to assert it was in a Civil Trial, there is no finding of "guilt" in a civil trial.....Guilt is reserved solely for Criminal Charges, subsequent to a criminal trial. Civil cases can only establish "liability"......Liability  where the burden of proof & validity of presented evidence is far, far lower than required to find a person "guilty" of a Crime in a criminal case/trial. The jury in a criminal trial must unanimously find the defendant guilty 'beyond all reasonable doubt.' So, the question remains, what crime resulted finding Donald Trump "guilty", & of what "crime" was he found guilty? "Liability" means absolutely nothing when dealing with criminal "Guilt". Come come, Panther, two of your DL's employees have been jailed. Mike, lawyer, got three years for paying off Stormy, porn star - "pay in cash". Allen, Chief Financial Officer, got three months for fraud. Both were just obeying orders. You? So, then we're in agreement......that he hasn't been found "guilty" 'beyond all reasonable doubt'....of a "crime" by a unanimous jury verdict, subsequent to a "Criminal Trial", to date...yes?

But of course. Then we agree he ordered Mike and Allen to commit crimes, yes?

And we agree he’ll be in court this month to stand trial for that crime, yes?

And we agree your threshold for wrongdoing is a charge, arrest and/or indictment for a criminal charge  as per your beloved rule of law, yes?

And we agree that, once found guilty  of a crime beyond any reasonable doubt by a jury of his peers, you will abandon all support, excuses, distraction,  evasion, whatabout this, whatabout that, and acknowledge finally, once and for all, you never could stand the man.

Yes?

All good, Panther. Why didn’t you just say that to begin with?

Zero Hedge   ;D

https://ygo-assets-websites-editorial-emea.yougov.net/original_images/Fake_News_Cover_Image.jpg

Karnal wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 11:52am:

Then we agree he ordered Mike and Allen to commit crimes, yes?

Has he been found guilty of that "offence"? Aiding and abetting? Procurement?

"Counsel and procure are types of accomplice activity. Counseling and procuring a crime can lead to punishment under federal and state laws up to the punishment for the crime itself, but this is only if the person knowingly helped the person committing the underlying crime."

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/counsel_and_procure

philperth2010 wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 11:41am:

Donald Trump has been fined for non-criminal fraud once again....Trump has been ordered to pay close to half a billion dollars in fines all up so far and been banned from doing business in New York for 3 years....The DA is irrelivant to Trump's guilt....No amount of deflection or spin can change these facts nor determine any criminal guilt!!! Quote: Judge orders Trump to pay $355 million for lying about his wealth in staggering civil fraud ruling a civil, non-criminal monetary penalty, which only denotes liability, not "guilt". https://imgur.com/6tcmHQH.gif NEW YORK (AP) — A New York judge ordered Donald Trump on Friday to pay $355 million in penalties, finding that the former president lied about his wealth for years in a sweeping civil fraud verdict that pierces his billionaire image but stops short of putting his real estate empire out of business. [smiley=lolk.gif] [smiley=lolk.gif] [smiley=lolk.gif] Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. Aldous Huxley (1894 - 1963), "Proper Studies", 1927 https://apnews.com/article/trump-civil-fraud-verdict-engoron-244024861f0df886543c157c9fc5b3e4

Being used to a different/inferior legal system than the one that actually matters relevant to actual "guilt"  under the superior US Legal System.....I can understand your uneducated dilemma, & your insistence on making incorrect legal statement after statement regarding an Americans "Criminal Guilt"......that said, whatever happens in a Civil Trial/Lawsuit, that under US Law only determines 'liability', sheds not one bit of light pertaining to a persons "guilt" in the American System, regardless of how you may want it to. https://imgur.com/6tcmHQH.gif https://imgur.com/hmTTjBe.gif

Donald Trump has to pay $355 million in penalties (+ interest), finding that the former President lied about his wealth for years in a sweeping civil fraud verdict....He has also been banned from doing business in New York for 3 years....More to come for the fraudster and con man!!!

[smiley=beer.gif] [smiley=beer.gif] [smiley=beer.gif]

lee wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 12:04pm:

Karnal wrote on Mar 6th, 2024 at 11:52am: Then we agree he ordered Mike and Allen to commit crimes, yes? Has he been found guilty of that "offence"? Aiding and abetting? Procurement? "Counsel and procure are types of accomplice activity. Counseling and procuring a crime can lead to punishment under federal and state laws up to the punishment for the crime itself, but this is only if the person knowingly helped the person committing the underlying crime." https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/counsel_and_procure

Not yet, Lee. To date, these facts have only been established in the civil courts. The criminal charges will rule in his trial starting March 25. There, Mike will be testifying to these facts as a witness. 

Allen’s evidence will also be presented. It is less likely he will be asked by the prosecution to testify, given his perjury in the civil trial.

Allen has been criminally charged, with prosecutors requesting another six months jail.

I’m sure you’ll be relieved, Lee. We all know you’re no Trump-man.

But you’re a big fan of the rule of law, no?

Karnal wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 1:40pm:

Not yet, Lee.

Thanks for that. So you agree that so far there is no evidence. So you are making sch!t up.

All the rest is just bloviating. ::)

lee wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 2:38pm:

Karnal wrote on Mar 6th, 2024 at 1:40pm: Not yet, Lee. Thanks for that. So you agree that so far there is no evidence.

There's plenty of evidence.

More than enough to secure a conviction.

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 2:49pm:

There's plenty of evidence. More than enough to secure a conviction.

And yet the charges haven't been made. It seems some people only believe in the rule of law until they don't. ::)

lee wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 3:05pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 6th, 2024 at 2:49pm: There's plenty of evidence. More than enough to secure a conviction. And yet the charges haven't been made. ...

Oh, they most certainly have.

The rapist has been charged with 91 felony counts in four separate cases.

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 3:24pm:

Oh, they most certainly have. The rapist has been charged with 91 felony counts in four separate cases.

Not the cases Matty mentioned. ::)

Felony charges are not felony convictions. ;)

lee wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 3:46pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 6th, 2024 at 3:24pm: Oh, they most certainly have. The rapist has been charged with 91 felony counts in four separate cases. Not the cases Matty mentioned. ::) Felony charges are not felony convictions. ;)

You didn't say convictions, you said charges.

The rapist has been charged 91 times.

You were wrong.  Move on.

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 3:51pm:

You didn't say convictions, you said charges.

So I did. So how many felony convictions?

lee wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 4:14pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 6th, 2024 at 3:51pm: You didn't say convictions, you said charges. So I did. So how many felony convictions?

Convictions happen after a court case, not before.

FFS, Lee: you're worse at this than Bobby.

lee wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 3:46pm:

It's not Wednesday.

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 4:16pm:

Convictions happen after a court case, not before.

So no felony court cases heard then. ;)

chimera wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 4:16pm:

lee wrote on Mar 6th, 2024 at 3:46pm: It's not Wednesday.

Wow. Chimera is back. With his usual lies. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

lee wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 2:38pm:

Karnal wrote on Mar 6th, 2024 at 1:40pm: Not yet, Lee. Thanks for that.

Anytime, Lee. So you agree that the facts have been established before the grand jury, in the indictments, the pre trial hearings and appeals and in the civil trial for fraud, with damages of $455 mil ruled to stand.

All good. Next time you pop in to defend the rule of law, it might help to seek your own legal advice, okay?

Our learned colleagues here have typically established the facts before you've even stepped in.

lee wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 4:42pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 6th, 2024 at 4:16pm: Convictions happen after a court case, not before. So no felony court cases heard then. ;)

Grand juries?

Four, I believe. Add the pre-trial hearings and arraignments and I think you'll find the big fella's already had a number of felony court dates.

You're no Trump-man, of course, so you're completely unbiased on this one.

Just like you believe in climate science, global warming, global cooling, experienced some rather brisk mornings last year and you don't have any Murdoch press over in WA to skew your unbiased views.

Karnal wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 5:12pm:

So you agree that the facts have been established before the grand jury, in the indictments, the pre trial hearings and appeals and in the civil trial for fraud, with damages of $455 mil ruled to stand.

So civil not felony? Pre-trial hearings and felony court dates are not findings of guilt, either. ::)

Karnal wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 5:12pm:

Next time you pop in to defend the rule of law, it might help to seek your own legal advice, okay?

I don't need legal advice.

lee wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 5:30pm:

Karnal wrote on Mar 6th, 2024 at 5:12pm: So you agree that the facts have been established before the grand jury, in the indictments, the pre trial hearings and appeals and in the civil trial for fraud, with damages of $455 mil ruled to stand. So civil not felony? Pre-trial hearings and felony court dates are not findings of guilt, either. ::) Karnal wrote on Mar 6th, 2024 at 5:12pm: Next time you pop in to defend the rule of law, it might help to seek your own legal advice, okay? I don't need legal advice.

No, Lee, four grand juries who voted overwhelmingly to indict for felonies.

Multiple arrangements where he entered his pleas.

Multiple appeals on said arraignments, and on and on.

I recommend an American legal expert, dear.

Panther, can you assist Lee, please?

/

chimera wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 5:45pm:

/

Very succinct. And about your intelligence level. ::)

Karnal wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 5:44pm:

No, Lee, four grand juries who voted overwhelmingly to indict for felonies.

And yet they haven't proceeded to trial. You do understand that, don't you? Indictments simply means they believe they have enough evidence. An indictment only hears one side of the case.  ::)

And you think I need legal help. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

"The old adage, meant to expose the one-sided grand jury portion of the judicial process, is that a prosecutor could get a grand jury to “indict a ham sandwich.” It’s just that easy. "

https://edition.cnn.com/2023/03/21/politics/grand-jury-indictment-trump-what-matters/index.html

lee wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 6:14pm:

Karnal wrote on Mar 6th, 2024 at 5:44pm: No, Lee, four grand juries who voted overwhelmingly to indict for felonies. And yet they haven't proceeded to trial. ...

They are proceeding to trial.

There is a process.  A timeline.  A sequence.

You seem to know less about the legal system than anyone I have ever encountered.

lee wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 6:14pm:

Karnal wrote on Mar 6th, 2024 at 5:44pm: No, Lee, four grand juries who voted overwhelmingly to indict for felonies. And yet they haven't proceeded to trial. You do understand that, don't you? Indictments simply means they believe they have enough evidence. An indictment only hears one side of the case.  ::) And you think I need legal help. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

I most certainly do, dear.


lee wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 4:42pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 6th, 2024 at 4:16pm: Convictions happen after a court case, not before. So no felony court cases heard then. ;)

As you've just shown, the big fella's felonies have been through multiple court cases to establish, in your own words, "enough evidence".

Now, when you speak to Panther, be sure to ask him about this evidence. Panther previously said that, if ever indicted, with evidence tendered by a prosecutor in a court or courts, he would abandon his Dear Leader for good.

Are you sure? We asked.

Sure, he answered.

Good luck with that, Panther said. He even threw in a few chuckles - like you.
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Karnal wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 6:25pm:

As you've just shown, the big fella's felonies have been through multiple court cases to establish, in your own words, "enough evidence".

And still heard only one side. What don't you understand about that? ::)

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 6:23pm:

They are proceeding to trial. There is a process.  A timeline.  A sequence.

Ah yes. Drag it out... Lawfare. ;D ;D ;D ;D

lee wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 6:37pm:

Karnal wrote on Mar 6th, 2024 at 6:25pm: As you've just shown, the big fella's felonies have been through multiple court cases to establish, in your own words, "enough evidence". And still heard only one side. What don't you understand about that? ::)

Understand what, dear? Are you saying the big fella didn't have legal representation during his arraignments? His indictments? Any of his other felony court cases? Which?

Are you saying due process wasn't followed? With an ex-prez?

Come come. I must say, I find that a little hard to believe, don't you?

Even for a non-Trump man like your good self, dear.

lee wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 6:38pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 6th, 2024 at 6:23pm: They are proceeding to trial. There is a process.  A timeline.  A sequence. Ah yes. Drag it out... Lawfare. ;D ;D ;D ;D

Whoops - guess who just outed himself as a Trump-man. Finally.

What took you so long, Lee?

The sheer injustice of prosecuting criminals is finally weighing on you, is it?

So unfair...

You're going to have to own up to having the Murdoch media over in WA too, Lee.

You've just outed yourself as Sky News viewer as well, dear.

Karnal wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 6:56pm:

Whoops - guess who just outed himself as a Trump-man. Finally.

What about Lawfare makes me a Trump-man. Tell me when he gets convicted of a felony. ::)


Karnal wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 6:56pm:

You've just outed yourself as Sky News viewer as well, dear.

Have I? Precisely where? ::)


Karnal wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 6:53pm:

Are you saying due process wasn't followed? With an ex-prez?

Poor Karny, can't even get his facts straight. An indictment only hears ONE side of the argument. In a court case TWO sides are heard. ::)

You are such a clutz.

we expect to see letitia james in court in 2025 along with a lot of other corrupt players.

if donny has one vice it is revenge


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iu24VKFMaQ0

"Our constitution requires that if the defendant chooses, he'll have an attorney represent a defendant in a trial. But, that sixth amendment protection does not extend to "suspects" and during a grand jury, that is all there is, a suspect."

https://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/why-can-t-the-defense-give-evidence-to-a-grand-jur-344178.html

aquascoot wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 7:54pm:

we expect to see letitia james in court in 2025 along with a lot of other corrupt players. if donny has one vice it is revenge https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iu24VKFMaQ0

100% TRUMP EXECUTES all these leftards when he gets in

THIS YEAR

It's a little thing called

TREASON

Watch it happen  :)

---

lee wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 7:14pm:

Karnal wrote on Mar 6th, 2024 at 6:56pm: Whoops - guess who just outed himself as a Trump-man. Finally. What about Lawfare makes me a Trump-man. Tell me when he gets convicted of a felony. ::) Karnal wrote on Mar 6th, 2024 at 6:56pm: You've just outed yourself as Sky News viewer as well, dear. Have I? Precisely where? ::) Karnal wrote on Mar 6th, 2024 at 6:53pm: Are you saying due process wasn't followed? With an ex-prez? Poor Karny, can't even get his facts straight. An indictment only hears ONE side of the argument. In a court case TWO sides are heard. ::) You are such a clutz.

Oh? Feel free to argue with yourself, dear.


lee wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 4:42pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 6th, 2024 at 4:16pm: Convictions happen after a court case, not before. So no felony court cases heard then. ;)

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

aquascoot wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 7:54pm:

we expect to see letitia james in court in 2025 along with a lot of other corrupt players. if donny has one vice it is revenge https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iu24VKFMaQ0

Letitia James is a state DA, dear.

What's your DL gonna do?

Make a shiv out of his toilet brush?

it_is_the_light wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 9:28pm:

aquascoot wrote on Mar 6th, 2024 at 7:54pm: we expect to see letitia james in court in 2025 along with a lot of other corrupt players. if donny has one vice it is revenge https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iu24VKFMaQ0 100% TRUMP EXECUTES all these leftards when he gets in THIS YEAR It's a little thing called TREASON

The inauguration is in January, dear one.

That's NEXT YEAR

If you get your years mixed up, all good.

Sir Bobby will be sitting in your cabin, honking.

---

John Smith wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 7:28am:

if only you set the same standards with trump, you'd realise how ridiculous you sound

Can't you see the hypocrisy? Isn't this what George Santos was indicted for?

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 11:57am:

Zero Hedge

You think anything not reported by the MSM is automatically fake. And most of that media is firmly in the Democrat camp.



The campaign for New York Attorney General Letitia James shelled out almost $250,000 on lodging, travel, restaurants and campaign consultants since 2023, despite James not being up for reelection until 2026, campaign finance filings show.

In addition to consultants, James’ campaign also spent extensively on Puerto Rican travel after her 2022 electoral victory.

The campaign spent over $13,500 at Puerto Rican hotels and restaurants between July and December 2023.
https://dailycaller.com/2024/02/29/new-york-james-campaign-cash/



In response to the criticism, Letitia James has defended her spending, arguing that the accommodations were necessary for her work in Puerto Rico. She maintains that the expenses were justified and in line with the requirements of her position. However, the controversy surrounding the expenditures continues to escalate, with many questioning the legitimacy of such high-end accommodations.

The news of Letitia James’ extravagant spending has sparked outrage among New York residents and taxpayers. Many feel that it is unacceptable for a public official to use taxpayer funds for personal luxury, especially when there are pressing issues and needs within the community. The public outcry has put pressure on James to be more transparent about her expenses and justify the use of public money for such extravagant purposes.
https://countylocalnews.com/2024/03/02/ny-ag-letitia-james-spent-15k-on-luxury-hotels-in-puerto-rico-investigation-needed/



New York attorney general Letitia James has used her campaign war chest to finance a life of luxury, a Washington Free Beacon review of state records reveals.

Campaign finance records show that James has pulled over $310,000 from her campaign since her 2018 election to purchase stays at luxury hotels across the country and host "political meetings" at swanky New York City restaurants. But the largest chunk of James’s extracurricular campaign spending has gone to finance her annual excursion to a Puerto Rican junket the New York Times calls a "most unusual gathering" of New York politicos.
https://freebeacon.com/democrats/private-jets-and-lobbyist-dance-parties-how-letitia-james-uses-campaign-funds-to-live-the-high-life/


New York Attorney General Letitia James’ campaign spent nearly $250,000 on travel, dining, accommodation, and campaign consultants throughout the 2023 calendar year, according to recent campaign finance filings. A series of expenditures for trips to Puerto Rico between July and December, totaling over $13,500, are drawing particular scrutiny. Some of these payments were given descriptively labeled purposes like “compliance” or “advertising,” while others remained vague or unclear.

The James for NY 2026 campaign splurged on luxury airline flights, nightclub outings, and extensive consulting fees. James is not up for re-election until 2026. These expenditures included over $218,000 paid to various “campaign consultants” between March and December.
https://thenationalpulse.com/2024/03/01/ny-ag-letitia-james-spent-over-13500-on-trips-to-puerto-rico-other-luxury-travel-totaling-250k-in-2023/



… the multiple stays at the Beverly Hills Wilshire, the $65,000 in “reimbursements” to “campaign consultants,” which could literally be anything.

Speaking of campaign consultants, can anyone tell me why a state Attorney General would need to spend over $300,000 in a single year on campaign consultants when they *just* won re-election the previous November? What could she possibly be consulting on?
https://www.uncoverdc.com/2024/02/28/the-campaign-finance-history-of-letitia-james-ag-of-ny-taunting-trump

wombatwoody wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 11:07pm:

John Smith wrote on Mar 6th, 2024 at 7:28am: if only you set the same standards with trump, you'd realise how ridiculous you sound Can't you see the hypocrisy? Isn't this what George Santos was indicted for?

George Santos was charged with Conspiracy, Wire Fraud, False Statements, Falsification of Records, Aggravated Identity Theft, and Credit Card Fraud.

https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/pr/congressman-george-santos-charged-conspiracy-wire-fraud-false-statements-0

What, exactly, has the Manhattan DA been charged with, Wombat?

Now, hypocrisy. Can you think of anyone else charged with Conspiracy, Fraud, False Statements, Falsification of Records?

Any takers?

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 6^th, 2024 at 11:57am:

Zero Hedge   ;D

https://i.postimg.cc/wv3qn0TN/Screenshot-2024-03-07-at-11-04-53-Fake-News-Cover-Image-jpg-JPEG-Image-1200-403-pixels.png

Exactly...

Zero Hedge is a batshit insane Austrian school finance blog run by
two pseudonymous founders who post articles under the name "Tyler
Durden," after the character from Fight Club. It's essentially apocalypse
porn.

Zero Hedge was deprecated as a Wikipedia source (should not be used
as a source for anything) on 19 June 2020, due to its propagation of
conspiracy theories and false or misleading information.

(Critics argue that Austrian economics lacks scientific rigour and rejects
scientific methods and the use of empirical data in modelling economic
behaviour.)

A major personal issue for Trump of course is the Dunning–Kruger
effect.  As November draws closer, this will increasingly impinge on
his decision making abilities—in simple terms, he'll lose the plot.

His narcissism, smugness, and egomania will, thankfully, be his
downfall.  He really believes he's a lot smarter than anybody else,
when in actuality he's never shown any capacity for advanced
intellect.  He even had to lie about his phony degree from Penn's
Wharton—paid for by his older brother Frederick's money.

His oft-expressed pride in acing an Alzheimer's test was the classic
example of the man's stupidity LOL.

      :D

AusGeoff wrote on Mar 7^th, 2024 at 10:28am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 6th, 2024 at 11:57am: Zero Hedge   ;D https://i.postimg.cc/wv3qn0TN/Screenshot-2024-03-07-at-11-04-53-Fake-News-Cover-Image-jpg-JPEG-Image-1200-403-pixels.png Exactly... Zero Hedge is a batshit insane Austrian school finance blog run by two pseudonymous founders who post articles under the name "Tyler Durden," after the character from Fight Club. It's essentially apocalypse porn. Zero Hedge was deprecated as a Wikipedia source (should not be used as a source for anything) on 19 June 2020, due to its propagation of conspiracy theories and false or misleading information. (Critics argue that Austrian economics lacks scientific rigour and rejects scientific methods and the use of empirical data in modelling economic behaviour.)

Where'd you get that from? Snopes? ;D

NY AG Letitia James booed at FDNY ceremony with chants of ‘Trump! Trump! Trump!’

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ny-ag-letitia-james-booed-at-firefighters-ceremony-with-chants-of-trump-trump-trump/ar-BB1jvIDf