I don't get it.  Why is the media so hyped up about Kate photo shopping some photo of her Mob?

What's the big deal?

:-/

The media everywhere likes to create stories where in reality there
are no stories; 70 point headlines sell papers.  And a gullible public
sucks up these non-stories like vacuous intellectual sponges.

And of course the usual slew of conspiracy theorist just luurve this
sort of bullshit—it gives them something other to masturbate to other
than the deadly COVID vaccinations LOL.

It's to do with the media trying to exclude AI generated images. The pic was thought to be AI generated. Do you want AI images included as fact or news?

Setanta wrote on Mar 16^th, 2024 at 8:12pm:

It's to do with the media trying to exclude AI generated images. The pic was thought to be AI generated. Do you want AI images included as fact or news?

Why not?  Around these parts, facts are denied all the time!

Seems to be the OzPol currency.

There's no way anybody familiar with Photoshop (or similar) would've
mistaken the royal's image as a genuine AI-generated image. Its end
result involved plenty of human intervention.

BTW, people are using the term "artificial intelligence" to unwittingly
misrepresent any original image post-processing programs.

Even IBM's definition is misleading:  AI "Is technology that enables
computers and machines to simulate human intelligence and problem-
solving capabilities".

Nope.  No current AI possess human logic—that which differentiates us
from machines.  And "simulate" means to imitate or mimic the appearance
of something. 

I cook with imitation vanilla essence.  It looks, smells, and tastes like the
real thing, but it's not.    No AI involved, and yet it fools me.