Quality horseshit, indeed.

https://youtu.be/i_6TVa7scKM

I watched that - the cover is fake leather and we don't know where it's printed -
it could have been printed in China by atheists.

You..you mean..Trump is not the real messiah? He's just a China evangelist to get them born again as believers?

This is the most shameful piece of merchandising i think i've ever come across.

anyone who buys this guys utter bullshit was either deprived of essential nutrients in childhood or has been kicked in the head by a horse too many times.

mothra wrote on Apr 23^rd, 2024 at 7:26am:

This is the most shameful piece of merchandising i think i've ever come across. anyone who buys this guys utter bullshit was either deprived of essential nutrients in childhood or has been kicked in the head by a horse too many times.

What if Albo or Dutton printed their version of the Bible -
would you buy it?    ;D

It is actually a King James Bible endorsed by Ed Greenwood and Trump.

You can buy yours here
https://godblesstheusabible.com/



https://youtu.be/bam_gAIQqx4?si=XrplYGmo5dJ5wL08

Aaaaannnnnnnd Frank pimps it.

You can't make this stuff up.

mothra wrote on Apr 23^rd, 2024 at 8:38am:

Aaaaannnnnnnd Frank pimps it. You can't make this stuff up.

You want one and we know it, sour old bint.

Live a little, for a change, instead of always just squawking and screeching like a  dippy, smug frightbat

Frank wrote on Apr 23^rd, 2024 at 8:42am:

mothra wrote on Apr 23rd, 2024 at 8:38am: Aaaaannnnnnnd Frank pimps it. You can't make this stuff up. You want one and we know it, sour old bint. Live a little, for a change, instead of always just squawking and screeching like a  dippy, smug frightbat

Did that even make sense to you in your head?

You know, sometimes a wee reflection before you post on reflex is a good thing.

Trump has cashed in on Yankist obsession with all things bible (generally the KJV) and its imagined association with the USA's 'manifest destiny' as 'prophesied' by bronze-age people.

The Yankist religious mindset is that of medieval English villagers.

Trump comes to the Sunshine State.
In a clear signal of faith and loyalty, church-goers will raise a Big Trump on the Bible belt. 'Towns have their Big Pineapple or Big Prawn. Now we can show our support for this 20metre high tribute to our president with his true Bible' said a local minister who knows Queensland well.

IS ANY OF THE MONEY FROM THIS BIBLE GOING TO THE DONALD J. TRUMP CAMPAIGN FOR PRESIDENT?

No, GodBlessTheUSABible.com is not political and has nothing to do with any political campaign. GodBlessTheUSABible.com is not owned, managed or controlled by Donald J. Trump, The Trump Organization, CIC Ventures LLC or any of their respective principals or affiliates.

GodBlessTheUSABible.com uses Donald J. Trump’s name, likeness and image under paid license from CIC Ventures LLC, which license may be terminated or revoked according to its terms.
https://godblesstheusabible.com/

Any funds received by DTrump as licensee will go directly to the needy porn stars and sexual assault victims. None will be used for state document storage, bank applications or lawyers.

The US is only one atrocity away from a literal witch-burning mania, similar to the anti-Satan-worshipping mania that swept through the US in the 80s.

Frank wrote on Apr 23^rd, 2024 at 9:20am:

No, GodBlessTheUSABible.com is not political and has nothing to do with any political campaign

is that like their claim that all the money donated to the childrens charity would be used to help children? :D :D :D

Wacky Christians finally grow up

https://youtu.be/dIx1S3Z2-kw


May be hope for America yet.

chimera wrote on Apr 23^rd, 2024 at 9:23am:

Any funds received by DTrump as licensee will go directly to the needy porn stars and sexual assault victims. None will be used for state document storage, bank applications or lawyers.

Good point, Chimera. Clinton, Bush and Obama all set up charitable foundations after they left office to help those most in need. The big fella?

He's banned from setting up a foundation - at least in New York. The first US president since I-don't-know who didn't establish a charity in his name, and the first former president who's had charities banned in his name.

We'll give so much we'll grow tired of giving, no?

Mattyfisk wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 2:34am:

chimera wrote on Apr 23rd, 2024 at 9:23am: Any funds received by DTrump as licensee will go directly to the needy porn stars and sexual assault victims. None will be used for state document storage, bank applications or lawyers. Good point, Chimera. Clinton, Bush and Obama all set up charitable foundations after they left office to help those most in need. The big fella? He's banned from setting up a foundation - at least in New York. The first US president since I-don't-know who didn't establish a charity in his name, and the first former president who's had charities banned in his name. We'll give so much we'll grow tired of giving, no?

the clinton foundation  ;D ;D ;D ;D

pretending to go dig wells for the pygmies but really just heading to epstein island


the biggest is the gates foundation (another mate of jeffs) doing experiments on african kiddies genes and using crispa gene editing to practice eugenics on the worlds poorest people (out of sight of western regulators),

why wouldnt the intelligence agencies compromise people like gates and clinton so they can "keep up' with china on their own set of laboratory mice (afrcian children).they certainly couldnt do it in the USA.

i suppose people still believe that gates and zuckerburg started off in a garage , when in fact they signed deals worth 100's of millions right back at the start that meant they were always patsys for the intelligence agencies

aquascoot wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 6:36am:

Mattyfisk wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 2:34am: chimera wrote on Apr 23rd, 2024 at 9:23am: Any funds received by DTrump as licensee will go directly to the needy porn stars and sexual assault victims. None will be used for state document storage, bank applications or lawyers. Good point, Chimera. Clinton, Bush and Obama all set up charitable foundations after they left office to help those most in need. The big fella? He's banned from setting up a foundation - at least in New York. The first US president since I-don't-know who didn't establish a charity in his name, and the first former president who's had charities banned in his name. We'll give so much we'll grow tired of giving, no? the clinton foundation  ;D ;D ;D ;D pretending to go dig wells for the pygmies but really just heading to epstein island the biggest is the gates foundation (another mate of jeffs) doing experiments on african kiddies genes and using crispa gene editing to practice eugenics on the worlds poorest people (out of sight of western regulators), why wouldnt the intelligence agencies compromise people like gates and clinton so they can "keep up' with china on their own set of laboratory mice (afrcian children).they certainly couldnt do it in the USA. i suppose people still believe that gates and zuckerburg started off in a garage , when in fact they signed deals worth 100's of millions right back at the start that meant they were always patsys for the intelligence agencies

Sorry, Aquascoot, do you mean the Clinton Foundation, assessed to be a top rated charity by independent monitors?

No Deep State there, dear, Charity Watch works for donors. The Clinton Foundation has an independent board, publishes annual audits and reports, meets all government benchmarks and is assessed as open and transparent.

The Clinton Foundation is totally on the level, dear. I've just shown you how. If you beg to differ, you'll need to explain how your gossip was missed by the auditors and independent evaluators.

In fact, if I was you I wouldn't wait. I'd be typing out a stern email to Charity Watch. I'd be asking them how they could possibly miss all this blatant corruption you keep alluding to, and do you know?

I wouldn't mind betting you get a reply. I'd like to see that reply.

You want to give it a stab?

Mattyfisk wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 4:13pm:

aquascoot wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 6:36am: Mattyfisk wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 2:34am: chimera wrote on Apr 23rd, 2024 at 9:23am: Any funds received by DTrump as licensee will go directly to the needy porn stars and sexual assault victims. None will be used for state document storage, bank applications or lawyers. Good point, Chimera. Clinton, Bush and Obama all set up charitable foundations after they left office to help those most in need. The big fella? He's banned from setting up a foundation - at least in New York. The first US president since I-don't-know who didn't establish a charity in his name, and the first former president who's had charities banned in his name. We'll give so much we'll grow tired of giving, no? the clinton foundation  ;D ;D ;D ;D pretending to go dig wells for the pygmies but really just heading to epstein island the biggest is the gates foundation (another mate of jeffs) doing experiments on african kiddies genes and using crispa gene editing to practice eugenics on the worlds poorest people (out of sight of western regulators), why wouldnt the intelligence agencies compromise people like gates and clinton so they can "keep up' with china on their own set of laboratory mice (afrcian children).they certainly couldnt do it in the USA. i suppose people still believe that gates and zuckerburg started off in a garage , when in fact they signed deals worth 100's of millions right back at the start that meant they were always patsys for the intelligence agencies Sorry, Aquascoot, do you mean the Clinton Foundation, assessed to be a top rated charity by independent monitors? No Deep State there, dear, Charity Watch works for donors. The Clinton Foundation has an independent board, publishes annual audits and reports, meets all government benchmarks and is assessed as open and transparent. The Clinton Foundation is totally on the level, dear. I've just shown you how. If you beg to differ, you'll need to explain how your gossip was missed by the auditors and independent evaluators. In fact, if I was you I wouldn't wait. I'd be typing out a stern email to Charity Watch. I'd be asking them how they could possibly miss all this blatant corruption you keep alluding to, and do you know? I wouldn't mind betting you get a reply. I'd like to see that reply. You want to give it a stab?

'ello, 'ello, 'ello, whassis, then?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_Foundation#Controversies


Mr Hard Dog to Keep on the Porch himself.

How much did he pay Paul az Jones? $880,000.


https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/83/Bill_Clinton_portrait_%282015%29.jpg/330px-Bill_Clinton_portrait_%282015%29.jpg

The Oxford English Dictionary added "nothingburger" as a valid word to its dictionary.  Merriam-Webster dictionary is considering the word in the future but there's nothing in it.

Frank wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 4:51pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 4:13pm: aquascoot wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 6:36am: Mattyfisk wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 2:34am: chimera wrote on Apr 23rd, 2024 at 9:23am: Any funds received by DTrump as licensee will go directly to the needy porn stars and sexual assault victims. None will be used for state document storage, bank applications or lawyers. Good point, Chimera. Clinton, Bush and Obama all set up charitable foundations after they left office to help those most in need. The big fella? He's banned from setting up a foundation - at least in New York. The first US president since I-don't-know who didn't establish a charity in his name, and the first former president who's had charities banned in his name. We'll give so much we'll grow tired of giving, no? the clinton foundation  ;D ;D ;D ;D pretending to go dig wells for the pygmies but really just heading to epstein island the biggest is the gates foundation (another mate of jeffs) doing experiments on african kiddies genes and using crispa gene editing to practice eugenics on the worlds poorest people (out of sight of western regulators), why wouldnt the intelligence agencies compromise people like gates and clinton so they can "keep up' with china on their own set of laboratory mice (afrcian children).they certainly couldnt do it in the USA. i suppose people still believe that gates and zuckerburg started off in a garage , when in fact they signed deals worth 100's of millions right back at the start that meant they were always patsys for the intelligence agencies Sorry, Aquascoot, do you mean the Clinton Foundation, assessed to be a top rated charity by independent monitors? No Deep State there, dear, Charity Watch works for donors. The Clinton Foundation has an independent board, publishes annual audits and reports, meets all government benchmarks and is assessed as open and transparent. The Clinton Foundation is totally on the level, dear. I've just shown you how. If you beg to differ, you'll need to explain how your gossip was missed by the auditors and independent evaluators. In fact, if I was you I wouldn't wait. I'd be typing out a stern email to Charity Watch. I'd be asking them how they could possibly miss all this blatant corruption you keep alluding to, and do you know? I wouldn't mind betting you get a reply. I'd like to see that reply. You want to give it a stab? 'ello, 'ello, 'ello, whassis, then? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_Foundation#Controversies Mr Hard Dog to Keep on the Porch himself. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/83/Bill_Clinton_portrait_%282015%29.jpg/330px-Bill_Clinton_portrait_%282015%29.jpg

That's a Wikipedia article, dear boy. It says that wealthy donors have been a source of "controversy".

Would you like to dob the Clinton Foundation in? You might knock a point off it's B+ rating.

Until then, can you explain where the Trump Foundation is?

All presidents have them. Where's your DL's?

Mattyfisk wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 5:49pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 4:51pm: Mattyfisk wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 4:13pm: aquascoot wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 6:36am: Mattyfisk wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 2:34am: chimera wrote on Apr 23rd, 2024 at 9:23am: Any funds received by DTrump as licensee will go directly to the needy porn stars and sexual assault victims. None will be used for state document storage, bank applications or lawyers. Good point, Chimera. Clinton, Bush and Obama all set up charitable foundations after they left office to help those most in need. The big fella? He's banned from setting up a foundation - at least in New York. The first US president since I-don't-know who didn't establish a charity in his name, and the first former president who's had charities banned in his name. We'll give so much we'll grow tired of giving, no? the clinton foundation  ;D ;D ;D ;D pretending to go dig wells for the pygmies but really just heading to epstein island the biggest is the gates foundation (another mate of jeffs) doing experiments on african kiddies genes and using crispa gene editing to practice eugenics on the worlds poorest people (out of sight of western regulators), why wouldnt the intelligence agencies compromise people like gates and clinton so they can "keep up' with china on their own set of laboratory mice (afrcian children).they certainly couldnt do it in the USA. i suppose people still believe that gates and zuckerburg started off in a garage , when in fact they signed deals worth 100's of millions right back at the start that meant they were always patsys for the intelligence agencies Sorry, Aquascoot, do you mean the Clinton Foundation, assessed to be a top rated charity by independent monitors? No Deep State there, dear, Charity Watch works for donors. The Clinton Foundation has an independent board, publishes annual audits and reports, meets all government benchmarks and is assessed as open and transparent. The Clinton Foundation is totally on the level, dear. I've just shown you how. If you beg to differ, you'll need to explain how your gossip was missed by the auditors and independent evaluators. In fact, if I was you I wouldn't wait. I'd be typing out a stern email to Charity Watch. I'd be asking them how they could possibly miss all this blatant corruption you keep alluding to, and do you know? I wouldn't mind betting you get a reply. I'd like to see that reply. You want to give it a stab? 'ello, 'ello, 'ello, whassis, then? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_Foundation#Controversies Mr Hard Dog to Keep on the Porch himself. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/83/Bill_Clinton_portrait_%282015%29.jpg/330px-Bill_Clinton_portrait_%282015%29.jpg That's a Wikipedia article, dear boy. It says that wealthy donors have been a source of "controversy". Would you like to dob the Clinton Foundation in? You might knock a point off it's B+ rating. Until then, can you explain where the Trump Foundation is? All presidents have them. Where's your DL's?

Frank?   :-/