Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
Member Run Boards >> Extremism Exposed >> Soldiers Punished for Refusing to Wear Yarmulke
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1722738612

Message started by Laugh till you cry on Aug 4th, 2024 at 12:30pm

Title: Soldiers Punished for Refusing to Wear Yarmulke
Post by Laugh till you cry on Aug 4th, 2024 at 12:30pm
The yarmulke is replacing all other headwear. Offenders refusing to wear yarmulkes will be punished.

The ADF will merge with the IDF and create a slouch yarmulke for Australian soldiers.

Akubra will ramp up production to ensure that yarmulkes are available to all 25 million Australians.

Officeworks will turn away all prospective customers not wearing a yarmulke.

There are no exceptions if customers want to avoid nasty experiences.

https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2018-06-03/ty-article/.premium/soldiers-reject-request-by-religious-schools-to-conform-outfit/0000017f-e822-da9b-a1ff-ec6f508c0000


Quote:
Israeli Soldiers Punished for Refusing to Wear Yarmulkes, Skirts at Religious Schools
The soldiers, who teach kids how to respond to emergencies, were confined to their base without any disciplinary process after the schools complained

Yaniv Kubovich, Jun 3, 2018

Soldiers from the Home Front Command who teach schoolchildren how to respond during emergencies were confined to their base after nonreligious soldiers refused requests from state religious schools to wear kippot or skirts when they teach in those schools. ...

Title: Re: Soldiers Punished for Refusing to Wear Yarmulke
Post by Bobby. on Aug 4th, 2024 at 12:38pm
Hi LTYC,
do you wear your kippah when you go shopping?
Does it get you better prices?




Title: Re: Soldiers Punished for Refusing to Wear Yarmulke
Post by Laugh till you cry on Aug 4th, 2024 at 12:43pm

Bobby. wrote on Aug 4th, 2024 at 12:38pm:
Hi LTYC,
do you wear your kippah when you go shopping?
Does it get you better prices?



I get blow jobs from Officeworks managers when I wear my yarmulke.

Jews have fought each other over the yarmulke. Goldman v. Weinberger, 1986.

The yarmulke may be the second most important thing in the cult after circumcision.

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/475/503/


Quote:
Goldman v. Weinberger, 475 U.S. 503 (1986)
Argued:
January 14, 1986
Decided:
March 25, 1986
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
Goldman v. Weinberger, 475 U.S. 503 (1986)
Goldman v. Weinberger

No. 84-1097

Argued January 14, 1986

Decided March 25, 1986

475 U.S. 503

Syllabus

Petitioner, an Orthodox Jew and ordained rabbi, was ordered not to wear a yarmulke while on duty and in uniform as a commissioned officer in the Air Force at March Air Force Base, pursuant to an Air Force regulation that provides that authorized headgear may be worn out of doors but that indoors "[h]eadgear [may] not be worn . . . except by armed security police in the performance of their duties." Petitioner then brought an action in Federal District Court, claiming that the application of the regulation to prevent him from wearing his yarmulke infringed upon his First Amendment freedom to exercise his religious beliefs. The District Court permanently enjoined the Air Force from enforcing the regulation against petitioner. The Court of Appeals reversed.

Held: The First Amendment does not prohibit the challenged regulation from being applied to petitioner, even though its effect is to restrict the wearing of the headgear required by his religious beliefs. That Amendment does not require the military to accommodate such practices as wearing a yarmulke in the face of its view that they would detract from the uniformity sought by dress regulations. Here, the Air Force has drawn the line essentially between religious apparel that is visible and that which is not, and the challenged regulation reasonably and evenhandedly regulates dress in the interest of the military's perceived need for uniformity. Pp. 475 U. S. 506-510.

236 U.S.App.D.C. 248, 734 F.2d 1531, affirmed.

REHNQUIST, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BURGER, C.J., and WHITE, POWELL, and STEVENS, JJ joined. STEVENS, J filed a concurring opinion, in which WHITE and POWELL, JJ., joined, post, p. 475 U. S. 510. BRENNAN, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which MARSHALL, J., joined, post, p. 475 U. S. 513. BLACKMUN, J., filed a dissenting opinion, post, p. 475 U. S. 524. O'CONNOR, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which MARSHALL, J., joined, post, p. 475 U. S. 528.

Page 475 U. S. 504

Read More
Opinions
Opinions & Dissents
U.S. Supreme Court
Goldman v. Weinberger, 475 U.S. 503 (1986)
Goldman v. Weinberger
No. 84-1097
Argued January 14, 1986
Decided March 25, 1986
475 U.S. 503
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
Syllabus
Petitioner, an Orthodox Jew and ordained rabbi, was ordered not to wear a yarmulke while on duty and in uniform as a commissioned officer in the Air Force at March Air Force Base, pursuant to an Air Force regulation that provides that authorized headgear may be worn out of doors but that indoors "[h]eadgear [may] not be worn . . . except by armed security police in the performance of their duties." Petitioner then brought an action in Federal District Court, claiming that the application of the regulation to prevent him from wearing his yarmulke infringed upon his First Amendment freedom to exercise his religious beliefs. The District Court permanently enjoined the Air Force from enforcing the regulation against petitioner. The Court of Appeals reversed.
Held: The First Amendment does not prohibit the challenged regulation from being applied to petitioner, even though its effect is to restrict the wearing of the headgear required by his religious beliefs. That Amendment does not require the military to accommodate such practices as wearing a yarmulke in the face of its view that they would detract from the uniformity sought by dress regulations. Here, the Air Force has drawn the line essentially between religious apparel that is visible and that which is not, and the challenged regulation reasonably and evenhandedly regulates dress in the interest of the military's perceived need for uniformity. Pp. 475 U. S. 506-510.
236 U.S.App.D.C. 248, 734 F.2d 1531, affirmed.

Title: Re: Soldiers Punished for Refusing to Wear Yarmulke
Post by Bobby. on Aug 4th, 2024 at 12:49pm

LTYC,

Quote:
I get blow jobs from Officeworks managers when I wear my yarmulke.


LTYC admits that he's a Jewish double agent working for the Zionist cause.

Title: Re: Soldiers Punished for Refusing to Wear Yarmulke
Post by Laugh till you cry on Aug 4th, 2024 at 12:58pm

Bobby. wrote on Aug 4th, 2024 at 12:49pm:
LTYC,

Quote:
I get blow jobs from Officeworks managers when I wear my yarmulke.


LTYC admits that he's a Jewish double agent working for the Zionist cause.


Australian Aboriginals have customized their yarmulkes.


Title: Re: Soldiers Punished for Refusing to Wear Yarmulke
Post by Bobby. on Aug 4th, 2024 at 1:02pm
Dear LTYC,
do you have one of these in your living room?



Title: Re: Soldiers Punished for Refusing to Wear Yarmulke
Post by Bobby. on Aug 4th, 2024 at 8:28pm
bump for LTYC.

Title: Re: Soldiers Punished for Refusing to Wear Yarmulke
Post by Laugh till you cry on Aug 4th, 2024 at 8:41pm
Bobby has mistaken LTYC for Rabbi Setanta.

Bvr has made his garage the epicenter of Judaism in Australia.

Title: Re: Soldiers Punished for Refusing to Wear Yarmulke
Post by Bobby. on Aug 4th, 2024 at 8:43pm

Laugh till you cry wrote on Aug 4th, 2024 at 8:41pm:
Bobby has mistaken LTYC for Rabbi Setanta.

Bvr has made his garage the epicenter of Judaism in Australia.



Who is Bvr?


Title: Re: Soldiers Punished for Refusing to Wear Yarmulke
Post by Setanta on Aug 4th, 2024 at 9:00pm

Bobby. wrote on Aug 4th, 2024 at 8:43pm:

Laugh till you cry wrote on Aug 4th, 2024 at 8:41pm:
Bobby has mistaken LTYC for Rabbi Setanta.

Bvr has made his garage the epicenter of Judaism in Australia.



Who is Bvr?


He is the one whose garage LTYC spies on, LTYC told me he's quite kinky and I couldn't handle what is in his head while he is watch BVR's garage. I'm glad he's not excited by my garage. He sounds like a back door manchild.

Title: Re: Soldiers Punished for Refusing to Wear Yarmulke
Post by Bobby. on Aug 4th, 2024 at 9:06pm

Setanta wrote on Aug 4th, 2024 at 9:00pm:

Bobby. wrote on Aug 4th, 2024 at 8:43pm:

Laugh till you cry wrote on Aug 4th, 2024 at 8:41pm:
Bobby has mistaken LTYC for Rabbi Setanta.

Bvr has made his garage the epicenter of Judaism in Australia.



Who is Bvr?


He is the one whose garage LTYC spies on, LTYC told me he's quite kinky and I couldn't handle what is in his head while he is watch BVR's garage. I'm glad he's not excited by my garage. He sounds like a back door manchild.



LTYC is a Jewish double agent spy who wears a kippah and
has a Jewish candelabra above his fire place.

Title: Re: Soldiers Punished for Refusing to Wear Yarmulke
Post by Laugh till you cry on Aug 4th, 2024 at 9:32pm
Bvr is Baronvonrort, the rabbi of the Ozpolitic death cult cabal.

Title: Re: Soldiers Punished for Refusing to Wear Yarmulke
Post by Bobby. on Aug 4th, 2024 at 9:46pm

Laugh till you cry wrote on Aug 4th, 2024 at 9:32pm:
Bvr is Baronvonrort, the rabbi of the Ozpolitic death cult cabal.



Baron hasn't posted for 2 days:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?action=viewprofile;username=Baronvonrort


I didn't know he was a Rabbi.    :)


Title: Re: Soldiers Punished for Refusing to Wear Yarmulke
Post by Laugh till you cry on Aug 4th, 2024 at 10:00pm

Bobby. wrote on Aug 4th, 2024 at 9:46pm:

Laugh till you cry wrote on Aug 4th, 2024 at 9:32pm:
Bvr is Baronvonrort, the rabbi of the Ozpolitic death cult cabal.



Baron hasn't posted for 2 days:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?action=viewprofile;username=Baronvonrort


I didn't know he was a Rabbi.    :)


Bvr engages in the hunting of small animals to satisfy his bloodlust.

He may be absent on a mission against animalkind.

Title: Re: Soldiers Punished for Refusing to Wear Yarmulke
Post by Jasin on Aug 9th, 2024 at 3:49pm
The closest LTYCrybaby gets to being Jewish
is when he pulls back his sweater on his little pink to remove his daily cheezel. It's his little ring of confidence.

Title: Re: Soldiers Punished for Refusing to Wear Yarmulke
Post by Laugh till you cry on Aug 9th, 2024 at 7:44pm

Jasin wrote on Aug 9th, 2024 at 3:49pm:
The closest LTYCrybaby gets to being Jewish
is when he pulls back his sweater on his little pink to remove his daily cheezel. It's his little ring of confidence.


JSin's lips are trembling and his tongue is wiggling as JSin fantasizes about engorging LTYC's penis.

Good luck with your dreams little buddy. I hope JSin's husband can keep up with the pace of JSin's fantasies about LTYC.

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.