Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> America >> Tulsi Gabbard
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1731466888

Message started by aquascoot on Nov 13th, 2024 at 1:01pm

Title: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by aquascoot on Nov 13th, 2024 at 1:01pm
is given a top role in the administration.

great news

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by chimera on Nov 13th, 2024 at 1:08pm
Do you have something useful to do with your life? Vibes in the bank loans office? E Commerce of horse semen? Writing a book on aquatic improvement?

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by tallowood on Nov 13th, 2024 at 1:08pm

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by lee on Nov 13th, 2024 at 1:25pm
That will upset the lefties. She's a woman of colour just not their preferred woman of colour. ::)

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Baronvonrort on Nov 15th, 2024 at 10:42pm

aquascoot wrote on Nov 13th, 2024 at 1:01pm:
is given a top role in the administration.

great news


Tulsi smashed Kamala in 2020 debate for Democrat nominee

Tulsi quits democRats saying the swamp has corrupted them.

Democrats put Tulsi on terror watchlist as payback for quitting and speaking out.

Trump appoints her to lead the department who put her on this watchlist.  ;D

Tulsi has a long military career currently a Lt Col in reserves

She is my bet for first female POTUS



tulsi_g.jpg (176 KB | 5 )

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Karnal on Nov 15th, 2024 at 11:58pm
Just so, leftards. A full blown Russian asset.

What could make America more great again more than having a Kremlin operative at the centre of US power?

I mean, what's wrong with getting along with Russia?

What's wrong with defending a little bit of hacking? Election interference? Money laundering? Child trafficking? European invading? 

Tulsi ends up with two pay packets, and that's okay.

We will make America great again, no?

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by SerialBrain9 on Nov 16th, 2024 at 9:40am
oh boy....  :)
images_199.jpg (12 KB | 6 )

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Frank on Nov 16th, 2024 at 10:11am

Karnal wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 11:58pm:
Just so, leftards. A full blown Russian asset.

What could make America more great again more than having a Kremlin operative at the centre of US power?

I mean, what's wrong with getting along with Russia?

What's wrong with defending a little bit of hacking? Election interference? Money laundering? Child trafficking? European invading? 

Tulsi ends up with two pay packets, and that's okay.

We will make America great again, no?


These are the kind of shameless, stupid lies the Dems have been peddling for years and which ultimately lost them the election at every level.



Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by tallowood on Nov 16th, 2024 at 10:30am

Karnal wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 11:58pm:
Just so, leftards. A full blown Russian asset.
What could make America more great again more than having a Kremlin operative at the centre of US power?
I mean, what's wrong with getting along with Russia?
What's wrong with defending a little bit of hacking? Election interference? Money laundering? Child trafficking? European invading? 
Tulsi ends up with two pay packets, and that's okay.
We will make America great again, no?


That's way better then Chinese quality Biden-Harris team.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by aquascoot on Nov 16th, 2024 at 12:08pm
she would make an awesome president

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Karnal on Nov 16th, 2024 at 1:10pm

Frank wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 10:11am:

Karnal wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 11:58pm:
Just so, leftards. A full blown Russian asset.

What could make America more great again more than having a Kremlin operative at the centre of US power?

I mean, what's wrong with getting along with Russia?

What's wrong with defending a little bit of hacking? Election interference? Money laundering? Child trafficking? European invading? 

Tulsi ends up with two pay packets, and that's okay.

We will make America great again, no?


These are the kind of shameless, stupid lies the Dems have been peddling for years and which ultimately lost them the election at every level.


Oh, come come, dear boy, just listen to her rattle off Vlad's list of talking points.

Vlad pays off the major MAGA podcasters. He communicates directly with the big fella himself. And he owns Tulsi.

None of this is questioned or even denied.

Imagine, if her nomination's approved, she'd control Five Eyes. That means all our Intel goes straight to the Kremlin.

And if it goes to the Kremlin, Vlad decides which tidbits to dish out to Xi.

Vlad, by the way, talks to Elon too. He recently did a favour for Xi, asking Elon to cut Taiwan's access to Starlink.

Just for fun, you understand. A bit of a lark.

The first Trump campaign in 2016 wanted a Russian back channel?

Now they've got it: the entire US intelligence apparatus.

Australia, Britain, Canada and Japan now need to revise their intelligence sharing with the US. I'd guess all bets are off.

You?

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Frank on Nov 16th, 2024 at 4:14pm

Karnal wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 1:10pm:

Frank wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 10:11am:

Karnal wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 11:58pm:
Just so, leftards. A full blown Russian asset.

What could make America more great again more than having a Kremlin operative at the centre of US power?

I mean, what's wrong with getting along with Russia?

What's wrong with defending a little bit of hacking? Election interference? Money laundering? Child trafficking? European invading? 

Tulsi ends up with two pay packets, and that's okay.

We will make America great again, no?


These are the kind of shameless, stupid lies the Dems have been peddling for years and which ultimately lost them the election at every level.


Oh, come come, dear boy, just listen to her rattle off Vlad's list of talking points.

Vlad pays off the major MAGA podcasters. He communicates directly with the big fella himself. And he owns Tulsi.

None of this is questioned or even denied.

Imagine, if her nomination's approved, she'd control Five Eyes. That means all our Intel goes straight to the Kremlin.

And if it goes to the Kremlin, Vlad decides which tidbits to dish out to Xi.

Vlad, by the way, talks to Elon too. He recently did a favour for Xi, asking Elon to cut Taiwan's access to Starlink.

Just for fun, you understand. A bit of a lark.

The first Trump campaign in 2016 wanted a Russian back channel?

Now they've got it: the entire US intelligence apparatus.

Australia, Britain, Canada and Japan now need to revise their intelligence sharing with the US. I'd guess all bets are off.

You?

Stupid nonsense.


Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by thegreatdivide on Nov 16th, 2024 at 4:27pm

aquascoot wrote on Nov 13th, 2024 at 1:01pm:
is given a top role in the administration.

great news


Correct (for once, better than never)...I wonder why chimera is so sour grapes...

oh  - the 'freedom or death' ideology which condemns soldiers and civilians to death in insane "legal" wars.

Although Israel's war is rapidly losing 'legality', even among egghead lawyers who attempt to define "legal" war.   

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by thegreatdivide on Nov 16th, 2024 at 4:34pm

Frank wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 4:14pm:

Karnal wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 1:10pm:

Frank wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 10:11am:

Karnal wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 11:58pm:
Just so, leftards. A full blown Russian asset.

What could make America more great again more than having a Kremlin operative at the centre of US power?

I mean, what's wrong with getting along with Russia?

What's wrong with defending a little bit of hacking? Election interference? Money laundering? Child trafficking? European invading? 

Tulsi ends up with two pay packets, and that's okay.

We will make America great again, no?


These are the kind of shameless, stupid lies the Dems have been peddling for years and which ultimately lost them the election at every level.


Oh, come come, dear boy, just listen to her rattle off Vlad's list of talking points.

Vlad pays off the major MAGA podcasters. He communicates directly with the big fella himself. And he owns Tulsi.

None of this is questioned or even denied.

Imagine, if her nomination's approved, she'd control Five Eyes. That means all our Intel goes straight to the Kremlin.

And if it goes to the Kremlin, Vlad decides which tidbits to dish out to Xi.

Vlad, by the way, talks to Elon too. He recently did a favour for Xi, asking Elon to cut Taiwan's access to Starlink.

Just for fun, you understand. A bit of a lark.

The first Trump campaign in 2016 wanted a Russian back channel?

Now they've got it: the entire US intelligence apparatus.

Australia, Britain, Canada and Japan now need to revise their intelligence sharing with the US. I'd guess all bets are off.

You?

Stupid nonsense.


I think you are having trouble with satire...

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Panther on Nov 16th, 2024 at 4:37pm
..





..


Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 10:42pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 13th, 2024 at 1:01pm:
is given a top role in the administration.

great news


Tulsi smashed Kamala in 2020 debate for Democrat nominee

Tulsi quits democRats saying the swamp has corrupted them.

Democrats put Tulsi on terror watchlist as payback for quitting and speaking out.

Trump appoints her to lead the department who put her on this watchlist.  ;D

Tulsi has a long military career currently a Lt Col in reserves

She is my bet for first female POTUS



I'D SECOND THAT NOMINATION!!!

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by thegreatdivide on Nov 16th, 2024 at 4:46pm

Panther wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 4:37pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 10:42pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 13th, 2024 at 1:01pm:
is given a top role in the administration.

great news


Tulsi smashed Kamala in 2020 debate for Democrat nominee

Tulsi quits democRats saying the swamp has corrupted them.

Democrats put Tulsi on terror watchlist as payback for quitting and speaking out.

Trump appoints her to lead the department who put her on this watchlist.  ;D

Tulsi has a long military career currently a Lt Col in reserves

She is my bet for first female POTUS


I'D SECOND THAT!!! 


So you're OK with her exposing the US government's complicity in endless wars? 

The lastest being the US triumphalism driving NATO's eastward expansion to Russia's borders, despite promising Russia that NATO wouldn't do that, after the collapse of the USSR. 

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Panther on Nov 16th, 2024 at 5:11pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 4:46pm:

Panther wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 4:37pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 10:42pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 13th, 2024 at 1:01pm:
is given a top role in the administration.

great news


Tulsi smashed Kamala in 2020 debate for Democrat nominee

Tulsi quits democRats saying the swamp has corrupted them.

Democrats put Tulsi on terror watchlist as payback for quitting and speaking out.

Trump appoints her to lead the department who put her on this watchlist.  ;D

Tulsi has a long military career currently a Lt Col in reserves

She is my bet for first female POTUS


I'D SECOND THAT!!! 


So you're OK with her exposing the US government's complicity in endless wars? 

The lastest being the US triumphalism driving NATO's eastward expansion to Russia's borders, despite promising Russia that NATO wouldn't do that, after the collapse of the USSR. 


So you're insinuating that a female nominee, for an advisory role as Director of National Intelligence, that that nomination would be overtly understood as a move toward WWIII with a Nuclear Super-Power that the democ-RATS said the President was an ally of......impeached for.....based on their ironclad evidence of conspiring with only 3-4 years ago?     

   Yer smokin' dope fella!! 




..

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by thegreatdivide on Nov 16th, 2024 at 5:34pm

Panther wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 5:11pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 4:46pm:

Panther wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 4:37pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 10:42pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 13th, 2024 at 1:01pm:
is given a top role in the administration.

great news


Tulsi smashed Kamala in 2020 debate for Democrat nominee

Tulsi quits democRats saying the swamp has corrupted them.

Democrats put Tulsi on terror watchlist as payback for quitting and speaking out.

Trump appoints her to lead the department who put her on this watchlist.  ;D

Tulsi has a long military career currently a Lt Col in reserves

She is my bet for first female POTUS


I'D SECOND THAT!!! 


So you're OK with her exposing the US government's complicity in endless wars? 

The lastest being the US triumphalism driving NATO's eastward expansion to Russia's borders, despite promising Russia that NATO wouldn't do that, after the collapse of the USSR. 


So you're insinuating that a female nominee, for an advisory role as Director of National Intelligence, that that nomination would be overtly understood as a move toward WWIII with a Nuclear Super-Power that the democ-RATS said the President was an ally of......impeached for.....based on their ironclad evidence of conspiring with only 3-4 years ago? 


No; I'm saying I like Gabbard's antiwar instincts - born out of experience -  and indeed Trump's own anti-war instincts if they are real ( eg "war is for losers" - you have to be alive to "do the deal"...),   as opposed to YOUR "freedom or death" ideology which condemns soldiers and civilians to death in endless insane wars.





Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Panther on Nov 16th, 2024 at 6:01pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 5:34pm:

Panther wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 5:11pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 4:46pm:

Panther wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 4:37pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 10:42pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 13th, 2024 at 1:01pm:
is given a top role in the administration.

great news


Tulsi smashed Kamala in 2020 debate for Democrat nominee

Tulsi quits democRats saying the swamp has corrupted them.

Democrats put Tulsi on terror watchlist as payback for quitting and speaking out.

Trump appoints her to lead the department who put her on this watchlist.  ;D

Tulsi has a long military career currently a Lt Col in reserves

She is my bet for first female POTUS


I'D SECOND THAT!!! 


So you're OK with her exposing the US government's complicity in endless wars? 

The lastest being the US triumphalism driving NATO's eastward expansion to Russia's borders, despite promising Russia that NATO wouldn't do that, after the collapse of the USSR. 


So you're insinuating that a female nominee, for an advisory role as Director of National Intelligence, that that nomination would be overtly understood as a move toward WWIII with a Nuclear Super-Power that the democ-RATS said the President was an ally of......impeached for.....based on their ironclad evidence of conspiring with only 3-4 years ago? 


No; I'm saying I like Gabbard's antiwar instincts - born out of experience -  and indeed Trump's own anti-war instincts if they are real ( eg "war is for losers" - you have to be alive to "do the deal"...),   as opposed to YOUR "freedom or death" ideology which condemns soldiers and civilians to death in endless insane wars.



Now I know, beyond any doubt, yer smokin' dope fella!!!

My ideology......

I'd rather give my life fighting government than allowing government....any government.....be they domestic or foreign......to restrict my Freedoms & Liberty!!




Quote:
"When the People fear government there is Tyranny;
When government fears the People there is Freedom & Liberty!"


'Live FREE or DIE'!






..

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Gordon on Nov 16th, 2024 at 7:08pm
Tulsi SHOULD have been the darling of the dems, smart, articulate, anti-war, woman of colour.

The weapons manufacturers put a target on her back over her anti-war stance then their paid shill, Killary Clinton went after her.

Just shows what the left is actually all about these days.









Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by aquascoot on Nov 16th, 2024 at 7:19pm

Gordon wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 7:08pm:
Tulsi SHOULD have been the darling of the dems, smart, articulate, anti-war, woman of colour.

The weapons manufacturers put a target on her back over her anti-war stance then their paid shill, Killary Clinton went after her.

Just shows what the left is actually all about these days.



very well said gordon

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 16th, 2024 at 7:23pm

Karnal wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 11:58pm:
Just so, leftards. A full blown Russian asset.

What could make America more great again more than having a Kremlin operative at the centre of US power?

I mean, what's wrong with getting along with Russia?

What's wrong with defending a little bit of hacking? Election interference? Money laundering? Child trafficking? European invading? 

Tulsi ends up with two pay packets, and that's okay.

We will make America great again, no?


;D

She'd sell her own mother if it meant she could get ahead.


Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by aquascoot on Nov 16th, 2024 at 7:30pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 7:23pm:

Karnal wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 11:58pm:
Just so, leftards. A full blown Russian asset.

What could make America more great again more than having a Kremlin operative at the centre of US power?

I mean, what's wrong with getting along with Russia?

What's wrong with defending a little bit of hacking? Election interference? Money laundering? Child trafficking? European invading? 

Tulsi ends up with two pay packets, and that's okay.

We will make America great again, no?


;D

She'd sell her own mother if it meant she could get ahead.


she must be the only democrat who will come out of 2024 winning.

so she's certainly getting ahead.

tell us again who won the popular vote by 8 million votes?

who increased his peurto rican vote by 26 %

who won the majority of latino mens votes

who increased his vote amongst middle aged women?

tulsi will be winning so much, she'll get tired of winning

:) :) :) :) :) :) :) :)

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 16th, 2024 at 7:32pm

aquascoot wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 7:30pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 7:23pm:

Karnal wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 11:58pm:
Just so, leftards. A full blown Russian asset.

What could make America more great again more than having a Kremlin operative at the centre of US power?

I mean, what's wrong with getting along with Russia?

What's wrong with defending a little bit of hacking? Election interference? Money laundering? Child trafficking? European invading? 

Tulsi ends up with two pay packets, and that's okay.

We will make America great again, no?


;D

She'd sell her own mother if it meant she could get ahead.


she must be the only democrat who will come out of 2024 winning.


Not even close.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by aquascoot on Nov 16th, 2024 at 7:37pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 7:32pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 7:30pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 7:23pm:

Karnal wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 11:58pm:
Just so, leftards. A full blown Russian asset.

What could make America more great again more than having a Kremlin operative at the centre of US power?

I mean, what's wrong with getting along with Russia?

What's wrong with defending a little bit of hacking? Election interference? Money laundering? Child trafficking? European invading? 

Tulsi ends up with two pay packets, and that's okay.

We will make America great again, no?


;D

She'd sell her own mother if it meant she could get ahead.


she must be the only democrat who will come out of 2024 winning.


Not even close.


who else?

"real' americans have delivered the white house, congress, the senate and the supreme court to the big fella

tell us again who won the popular vote

if he wasnt a rapist and bankrupt who stole from kids charities , imagine how many more votes he would have gotten
:D :D :D

thankfully his opposition were so despised. people didnt care about the rape and felonies.

so how lowly must they rate the left  ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 16th, 2024 at 7:48pm

aquascoot wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 7:37pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 7:32pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 7:30pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 7:23pm:

Karnal wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 11:58pm:
Just so, leftards. A full blown Russian asset.

What could make America more great again more than having a Kremlin operative at the centre of US power?

I mean, what's wrong with getting along with Russia?

What's wrong with defending a little bit of hacking? Election interference? Money laundering? Child trafficking? European invading? 

Tulsi ends up with two pay packets, and that's okay.

We will make America great again, no?


;D

She'd sell her own mother if it meant she could get ahead.


she must be the only democrat who will come out of 2024 winning.


Not even close.


who else?


Ruben Gallego   :)

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Frank on Nov 16th, 2024 at 8:31pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 7:48pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 7:37pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 7:32pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 7:30pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 7:23pm:

Karnal wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 11:58pm:
Just so, leftards. A full blown Russian asset.

What could make America more great again more than having a Kremlin operative at the centre of US power?

I mean, what's wrong with getting along with Russia?

What's wrong with defending a little bit of hacking? Election interference? Money laundering? Child trafficking? European invading? 

Tulsi ends up with two pay packets, and that's okay.

We will make America great again, no?


;D

She'd sell her own mother if it meant she could get ahead.


she must be the only democrat who will come out of 2024 winning.


Not even close.


who else?


Ruben Gallego   :)

Yeah, everyone is talking about him....

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 16th, 2024 at 8:45pm

Frank wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 8:31pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 7:48pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 7:37pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 7:32pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 7:30pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 7:23pm:

Karnal wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 11:58pm:
Just so, leftards. A full blown Russian asset.

What could make America more great again more than having a Kremlin operative at the centre of US power?

I mean, what's wrong with getting along with Russia?

What's wrong with defending a little bit of hacking? Election interference? Money laundering? Child trafficking? European invading? 

Tulsi ends up with two pay packets, and that's okay.

We will make America great again, no?


;D

She'd sell her own mother if it meant she could get ahead.


she must be the only democrat who will come out of 2024 winning.


Not even close.


who else?


Ruben Gallego   :)

Yeah, everyone is talking about him....


Kari Lake certainly is   ;D

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Gordon on Nov 16th, 2024 at 8:51pm
Tulsi is a true patriot.


In April 2003, while serving in the Hawaii State Legislature, Gabbard enlisted in the Hawaii Army National Guard.[76] In July 2004, she was deployed for a 12-month tour in Iraq, serving as a specialist with the Medical Company, 29th Support Battalion, 29th Infantry Brigade Combat Team.[77][78] In Iraq, Gabbard served at Logistical Support Area Anaconda, completing her tour in 2005.[79][80] Because of the deployment, she chose not to campaign for reelection to the state legislature.[81]

In March 2007, she graduated from the Accelerated Officer Candidate School at the Alabama Military Academy and graduated at the top of her class, the first woman ever to do so.[12] She was commissioned as a second lieutenant, and assigned to the 29th Brigade Special Troops Battalion, 29th Infantry Brigade Combat Team of the Hawaii Army National Guard, this time to serve as an Army Military Police officer.[13][82] She was stationed in Kuwait from 2008 to 2009.[80][83][84] She was one of the first women to enter a Kuwaiti military facility,[5][85] as well as the first woman to receive an award of appreciation from the Kuwait National Guard.[86][5]

Gabbard is a recipient of the Combat Medical Badge and the Meritorious Service Medal from the United States.[87] She also received the German Armed Forces Badge for Military Proficiency in gold.

On October 12, 2015, she was promoted from the rank of captain to major at a ceremony at the National Memorial Cemetery of the Pacific.[15][88] She continued to serve as a major in the Hawaii Army National Guard until her transfer to the 351st Civil Affairs Command, a California-based United States Army Reserve unit assigned to the United States Army Civil Affairs and Psychological Operations Command, in June 2020.[89][90]

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Gordon on Nov 16th, 2024 at 8:53pm
This is the ghoul who called her a Russian agent

Hillary Clinton has been forced to admit she exaggerated claims of coming under sniper fire during a visit to Bosnia in the 1990s after video footage showed the then first lady walking calmly from her plane.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/mar/25/hillaryclinton.uselections2008

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Dnarever on Nov 16th, 2024 at 8:58pm

Quote:
Tulsi Gabbard


Has never held a position that she didn't sell out.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Frank on Nov 16th, 2024 at 8:58pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 8:45pm:

Frank wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 8:31pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 7:48pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 7:37pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 7:32pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 7:30pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 7:23pm:

Karnal wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 11:58pm:
Just so, leftards. A full blown Russian asset.

What could make America more great again more than having a Kremlin operative at the centre of US power?

I mean, what's wrong with getting along with Russia?

What's wrong with defending a little bit of hacking? Election interference? Money laundering? Child trafficking? European invading? 

Tulsi ends up with two pay packets, and that's okay.

We will make America great again, no?


;D

She'd sell her own mother if it meant she could get ahead.


she must be the only democrat who will come out of 2024 winning.


Not even close.


who else?


Ruben Gallego   :)

Yeah, everyone is talking about him....


Kari Lake certainly is   ;D

Can't say I have heard of either of them.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Mortdooley on Nov 16th, 2024 at 9:33pm
Ruben Gallego is claimed to be involved with the Mexican drug cartels. Kari Lake is a Patriot. So now you know who they are and who supports each one.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Dnarever on Nov 16th, 2024 at 10:29pm

aquascoot wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 7:30pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 7:23pm:

Karnal wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 11:58pm:
Just so, leftards. A full blown Russian asset.

What could make America more great again more than having a Kremlin operative at the centre of US power?

I mean, what's wrong with getting along with Russia?

What's wrong with defending a little bit of hacking? Election interference? Money laundering? Child trafficking? European invading? 

Tulsi ends up with two pay packets, and that's okay.

We will make America great again, no?


;D

She'd sell her own mother if it meant she could get ahead.


she must be the only democrat who will come out of 2024 winning.


She isn't a Democrat.

Tulsi was brought up a republican.

She stood and was elected as a Progressive Democrat

She immediately swapped to a right wing as a corporate democrat.

From day 1 she consistently voted with the Republicans.

She Left the Democrats and became an Independent.

She didn't stand for election in her seat in 2024 - because the voters hate her.

She is currently a MAGA Republican.

In short she believes in absolutely nothing.


Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Dnarever on Nov 16th, 2024 at 10:31pm

Mortdooley wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 9:33pm:
Ruben Gallego is claimed to be involved with the Mexican drug cartels. Kari Lake is a Patriot. So now you know who they are and who supports each one.


Kari Lake is a Nutter.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Karnal on Nov 17th, 2024 at 12:07am

Frank wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 4:14pm:

Karnal wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 1:10pm:

Frank wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 10:11am:

Karnal wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 11:58pm:
Just so, leftards. A full blown Russian asset.

What could make America more great again more than having a Kremlin operative at the centre of US power?

I mean, what's wrong with getting along with Russia?

What's wrong with defending a little bit of hacking? Election interference? Money laundering? Child trafficking? European invading? 

Tulsi ends up with two pay packets, and that's okay.

We will make America great again, no?


These are the kind of shameless, stupid lies the Dems have been peddling for years and which ultimately lost them the election at every level.


Oh, come come, dear boy, just listen to her rattle off Vlad's list of talking points.

Vlad pays off the major MAGA podcasters. He communicates directly with the big fella himself. And he owns Tulsi.

None of this is questioned or even denied.

Imagine, if her nomination's approved, she'd control Five Eyes. That means all our Intel goes straight to the Kremlin.

And if it goes to the Kremlin, Vlad decides which tidbits to dish out to Xi.

Vlad, by the way, talks to Elon too. He recently did a favour for Xi, asking Elon to cut Taiwan's access to Starlink.

Just for fun, you understand. A bit of a lark.

The first Trump campaign in 2016 wanted a Russian back channel?

Now they've got it: the entire US intelligence apparatus.

Australia, Britain, Canada and Japan now need to revise their intelligence sharing with the US. I'd guess all bets are off.

You?

Stupid nonsense.


Such marvellous political analysis, dear boy.

My guess is we'll pull out, as will every major Western power.

Why would we hand over our secrets to Tulsi?

Stupid nonsense, innit.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Karnal on Nov 17th, 2024 at 12:12am

Gordon wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 8:53pm:
This is the ghoul who called her a Russian agent

Hillary Clinton has been forced to admit she exaggerated claims of coming under sniper fire during a visit to Bosnia in the 1990s after video footage showed the then first lady walking calmly from her plane.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/mar/25/hillaryclinton.uselections2008


Just so. Hillary Clinton, who still has access to US Intel and is fully in-the-know.

You, on the other hand, have access to the change rooms at Bondi Nippers.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 17th, 2024 at 7:50am

Mortdooley wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 9:33pm:
Ruben Gallego is claimed to be ...


Kari Lake is claimed to be a human being.


Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Frank on Nov 17th, 2024 at 8:19am

Karnal wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 11:58pm:
Just so, leftards. A full blown Russian asset.

What could make America more great again more than having a Kremlin operative at the centre of US power?

I mean, what's wrong with getting along with Russia?

What's wrong with defending a little bit of hacking? Election interference? Money laundering? Child trafficking? European invading? 

Tulsi ends up with two pay packets, and that's okay.

We will make America great again, no?


Good point: " Imagine having such incredibly strong opinions about Tulsi Gabbard and not actually having a single clue as to what she’s said, only knowing that the group you’re trying to fit into requires for you to have those strong opinions."

Lefty mongs, unite!

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 17th, 2024 at 8:43am

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Karnal on Nov 17th, 2024 at 8:48am

Frank wrote on Nov 17th, 2024 at 8:19am:

Karnal wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 11:58pm:
Just so, leftards. A full blown Russian asset.

What could make America more great again more than having a Kremlin operative at the centre of US power?

I mean, what's wrong with getting along with Russia?

What's wrong with defending a little bit of hacking? Election interference? Money laundering? Child trafficking? European invading? 

Tulsi ends up with two pay packets, and that's okay.

We will make America great again, no?


Good point: " Imagine having such incredibly strong opinions about Tulsi Gabbard and not actually having a single clue as to what she’s said, only knowing that the group you’re trying to fit into requires for you to have those strong opinions."

Lefty mongs, unite!


And if I told you, you'd ignore, throw a hissy and play whatabout that

Without a doubt, Vlad's either paying her, or has kompromat. Do you know what you are, old boy?

You're a volunteer.

Good for you, no?

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Karnal on Nov 17th, 2024 at 8:51am

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 17th, 2024 at 8:43am:


Hi Tulsi. You and Tucker make quite a pair.

Reminds one of breakfast TV presenters on RT, no?

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Frank on Nov 17th, 2024 at 9:41am

Karnal wrote on Nov 17th, 2024 at 8:48am:

Frank wrote on Nov 17th, 2024 at 8:19am:

Karnal wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 11:58pm:
Just so, leftards. A full blown Russian asset.

What could make America more great again more than having a Kremlin operative at the centre of US power?

I mean, what's wrong with getting along with Russia?

What's wrong with defending a little bit of hacking? Election interference? Money laundering? Child trafficking? European invading? 

Tulsi ends up with two pay packets, and that's okay.

We will make America great again, no?


Good point: " Imagine having such incredibly strong opinions about Tulsi Gabbard and not actually having a single clue as to what she’s said, only knowing that the group you’re trying to fit into requires for you to have those strong opinions."

Lefty mongs, unite!


And if I told you, you'd ignore, throw a hissy and play whatabout that

Without a doubt, Vlad's either paying her, or has kompromat. Do you know what you are, old boy?

You're a volunteer.

Good for you, no?

Malicious gossip of the kind the Dems are spreading about everyone who disagrees with them.
Gossip, nothing else. Distortions, lies, 'gotcha' attempts. You and Sprint, turd and Sad love it.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 17th, 2024 at 9:44am


Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by aquascoot on Nov 17th, 2024 at 1:53pm
tulsi has appeared twice on rogan and twice on modern wisdom

her exposure is probably in the 100's of millions of 3 hour chatting and vibing with 2 of the most popular and important people on communications
and engagement with "real' people.

as such she may be americas best placed politician.

she comes across as highly intelligent, and highly ethical.

she has a huge fan base

most definitely she has been the one democrat to move into an upward spiral

the white house may await as americas first female president

i cant see a demographic she offends apart from a few fringe leftie lunatics who are irrelevant  ;)

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 17th, 2024 at 2:47pm

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by aquascoot on Nov 17th, 2024 at 2:53pm
all that russian conspiracy stuff really backfired on the democrats

gabbard speaks for most "real' americans when she says trump is correct to want no foreign wars

by the way, putin met the german chancellor for the first time in years 24 hrs after donny took over.

i guess the democrat warmongers are just going to have to admit trump is the president of peace  :D :D

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 17th, 2024 at 3:03pm

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by aquascoot on Nov 17th, 2024 at 3:57pm
keep posting gweggy

the entire younger generation have heard her talk to rogan about treating shot up soldiers during her tours . soldiers shot up because the left have become warmongers

keep it up

should be good for another million lost by the left  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 17th, 2024 at 4:11pm

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Gordon on Nov 17th, 2024 at 4:58pm
Now she's director of national intelligence, the people who put her on a terror watch list at the beckoning of the DNC will be crapping their dacks.  ;D

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Frank on Nov 17th, 2024 at 5:21pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 17th, 2024 at 4:11pm:


;D ;D

Julia Davis @JuliaDavisNews
·
15h
‘Extraordinarily dangerous’: Intelligence community insiders warn against Trump’s DNI pick


:D :D :D

The same 'intelligence community' that swore the Hunter laptop was also a Russia hoax.


Like Sprinty and paki, you can't gobble down enough crap from the likes of Julia Davis and the totally discredited 'intelligence community' and never Trumper ( so 2015) crowd.

When ARE you pissing off back to Yugoslavia?

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 17th, 2024 at 6:36pm

Frank wrote on Nov 17th, 2024 at 5:21pm:
When ARE you pissing off back to Yugoslavia?


1992?   :-/

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 17th, 2024 at 6:37pm

Gordon wrote on Nov 17th, 2024 at 4:58pm:
Now she's director of national intelligence, the people who put her on a terror watch list at the beckoning of the DNC will be crapping their dacks.  ;D


She won't do a thing.

She's an empty vessel.

Gutless.


Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by lee on Nov 17th, 2024 at 6:50pm
Speaking of frauds Gweggy, when are you leaving? ;)

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Baronvonrort on Nov 17th, 2024 at 10:05pm

Karnal wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 11:58pm:
Just so, leftards. A full blown Russian asset.

What could make America more great again more than having a Kremlin operative at the centre of US power?

I mean, what's wrong with getting along with Russia?



DemocRats wear commie hats and nobody says anything.



jen_psaki_commie.png (226 KB | 3 )

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Baronvonrort on Nov 17th, 2024 at 10:09pm

aquascoot wrote on Nov 17th, 2024 at 1:53pm:
tulsi has appeared twice on rogan and twice on modern wisdom

her exposure is probably in the 100's of millions of 3 hour chatting and vibing with 2 of the most popular and important people on communications
and engagement with "real' people.

as such she may be americas best placed politician.

she comes across as highly intelligent, and highly ethical.

she has a huge fan base

most definitely she has been the one democrat to move into an upward spiral

the white house may await as americas first female president

i cant see a demographic she offends apart from a few fringe leftie lunatics who are irrelevant  ;)



Nice video of Tulsi should i put a trigger warning for the leftards?

I would Tap that ;)

https://x.com/RickyDoggin/status/1857229963776463277

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Karnal on Nov 17th, 2024 at 10:16pm

Frank wrote on Nov 17th, 2024 at 9:41am:

Karnal wrote on Nov 17th, 2024 at 8:48am:

Frank wrote on Nov 17th, 2024 at 8:19am:

Karnal wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 11:58pm:
Just so, leftards. A full blown Russian asset.

What could make America more great again more than having a Kremlin operative at the centre of US power?

I mean, what's wrong with getting along with Russia?

What's wrong with defending a little bit of hacking? Election interference? Money laundering? Child trafficking? European invading? 

Tulsi ends up with two pay packets, and that's okay.

We will make America great again, no?


Good point: " Imagine having such incredibly strong opinions about Tulsi Gabbard and not actually having a single clue as to what she’s said, only knowing that the group you’re trying to fit into requires for you to have those strong opinions."

Lefty mongs, unite!


And if I told you, you'd ignore, throw a hissy and play whatabout that

Without a doubt, Vlad's either paying her, or has kompromat. Do you know what you are, old boy?

You're a volunteer.

Good for you, no?

Malicious gossip of the kind the Dems are spreading about everyone who disagrees with them.
Gossip, nothing else. Distortions, lies, 'gotcha' attempts. You and Sprint, turd and Sad love it.


It's not malicious gossip when she's telling you in her own words, you snivelling old cadaver.

Tulsi's woke to Vlad, dear chap. Somehow, she knows all the propaganda, right down to obscure Kremlin talking points.

But you go, girl. Tulsi, tinted - but tamed. We always knew who's side you're really on.

Feel it.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Karnal on Nov 17th, 2024 at 10:19pm

Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 17th, 2024 at 10:05pm:

Karnal wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 11:58pm:
Just so, leftards. A full blown Russian asset.

What could make America more great again more than having a Kremlin operative at the centre of US power?

I mean, what's wrong with getting along with Russia?



DemocRats wear commie hats and nobody says anything.


The USSR disbanded 30 years ago, dear. Did you know?

Back to bed, Baron. Take your sleepers.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Karnal on Nov 17th, 2024 at 10:24pm

aquascoot wrote on Nov 17th, 2024 at 3:57pm:
keep posting gweggy

the entire younger generation have heard her talk to rogan about treating shot up soldiers during her tours . soldiers shot up because the left have become warmongers

keep it up

should be good for another million lost by the left  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


The only leftie warmongers in Washington are the ones left over from the Bush-Cheney administration.

With the new administration, you're about to see what warmongers really look like. Don't believe me?

You'll see. Your DL's already got a new name for Palestine. Guess what it is.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by aquascoot on Nov 18th, 2024 at 5:12am

Karnal wrote on Nov 17th, 2024 at 10:24pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 17th, 2024 at 3:57pm:
keep posting gweggy

the entire younger generation have heard her talk to rogan about treating shot up soldiers during her tours . soldiers shot up because the left have become warmongers

keep it up

should be good for another million lost by the left  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


The only leftie warmongers in Washington are the ones left over from the Bush-Cheney administration.

With the new administration, you're about to see what warmongers really look like. Don't believe me?

You'll see. Your DL's already got a new name for Palestine. Guess what it is.



dick cheney, warmonger extraordinaire, endorsed   HARRIS you dickhead  ;D ;D

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by wombatwoody on Nov 18th, 2024 at 6:35am

aquascoot wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 5:12am:

Karnal wrote on Nov 17th, 2024 at 10:24pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 17th, 2024 at 3:57pm:
keep posting gweggy

the entire younger generation have heard her talk to rogan about treating shot up soldiers during her tours . soldiers shot up because the left have become warmongers

keep it up

should be good for another million lost by the left  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


The only leftie warmongers in Washington are the ones left over from the Bush-Cheney administration.

With the new administration, you're about to see what warmongers really look like. Don't believe me?

You'll see. Your DL's already got a new name for Palestine. Guess what it is.



dick cheney, warmonger extraordinaire, endorsed   HARRIS you dickhead  ;D ;D



The Incoming Trump Administration Is Already Filling Up With War Sluts


Donald Trump has named Republican congressman Mike Waltz as his next national security advisor, a position that was held by ultrahawk John Bolton in the last Trump administration.

Like Bolton, Waltz is a warmongering freak. Journalist Michael Tracey has been filling up his Twitter page since the announcement with examples of Waltz’s insane hawkishness, including his support for letting Ukraine use US weapons to strike deep into Russian territory, criticizing Biden for not escalating aggressively enough in Ukraine, advocating bombing Iran, opposing the US military withdrawal from Afghanistan, and naming Iran, North Korea, China, Russia and Venezuela as “on the march” against the United States toward global conflict. The mainstream press are calling Waltz a “China hawk”, but from the look of things he’s a war-horny hawk toward all the official enemies of the United States.

Trump has also confirmed that Republican congresswoman Elise Stefanik will be taking on the role of US ambassador to the UN, a role previously held by warmonger Nikki Haley in the last Trump administration. Again, there doesn’t seem to be much difference between the old hawk and the new one.

Stefanik is best known for her congressional efforts to stomp out free speech on college campuses, making a lie of Trump’s lip service to the importance of First Amendment rights. She’s a hawkish swamp monster whose political career was primed in some of the most odious neoconservative think tanks in Washington, and opposes placing any limits on US military support for Israel. Earlier this year Stefanik actually flew to Israel to give a speech before the Israeli Knesset vowing to help stop the “antisemitism” of protesters against Israel’s genocidal atrocities at American universities.

And now we’re getting reports throughout the mass media that deranged war slut Marco Rubio has been tapped as Trump’s new secretary of state. It’s really hard to imagine anyone worse for the role of Washington’s top diplomat than a warmonger who has spent his entire political career pushing for more wars, sanctions and slaughter at every opportunity.

This should dash the hopes of Trump supporters everywhere that this time their guy really will end the wars and drain the swamp. Trump’s appointment of Iran hawk Brian Hook to help staff the State Department for the next administration and his rumored consideration of Mike Rogers for secretary of defense are likewise bad signs, as is Tucker Carlson’s claim that virulent China hawk Elbridge Colby is likely to play a role in the administration.

Trump’s anti-interventionist supporters loudly applauded the other day when he unexpectedly announced that Mike Pompeo and Nikki Haley would not be playing a role in the next administration. In response to the announcement, libertarian comedian and podcaster Dave Smith said on Twitter that stopping Pompeo was not enough and that “we need maximum pressure to keep all neocons and war hawks out of the Trump administration.” In response to Smith’s post, Donald Trump Jr tweeted, “Agreed!!! I’m on it.”

When I saw this, I tweeted the following:

Ignore their words and watch their actions. Been saying it for years, and I’m going to keep on saying it. Ignore their words, watch their actions. Talk, as they say, is cheap.”

Their actions are telling us a lot more than their words right now.

https://x.com/caitoz/status/1856172604652216502

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by tallowood on Nov 18th, 2024 at 7:07am
Peace loving Joe Biden decided to escalate war before Trump can stop it.

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/11/17/politics/biden-authorizes-ukraine-missiles-russian-targets/index.html

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by John Smith on Nov 18th, 2024 at 7:09am

aquascoot wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 5:12am:
dick cheney, warmonger extraordinaire, endorsed   HARRIS you dickhead


Telling that even a warmonger like him realised what  disaster Trump will be, and yet you are to stupid to realise it.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:20am

aquascoot wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 5:12am:

Karnal wrote on Nov 17th, 2024 at 10:24pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 17th, 2024 at 3:57pm:
keep posting gweggy

the entire younger generation have heard her talk to rogan about treating shot up soldiers during her tours . soldiers shot up because the left have become warmongers

keep it up

should be good for another million lost by the left  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


The only leftie warmongers in Washington are the ones left over from the Bush-Cheney administration.

With the new administration, you're about to see what warmongers really look like. Don't believe me?

You'll see. Your DL's already got a new name for Palestine. Guess what it is.



dick cheney, warmonger extraordinaire, endorsed   HARRIS you dickhead  ;D ;D


Dick Cheney is:

a) not in Washington, and

b) not a lefty

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by aquascoot on Nov 18th, 2024 at 11:25am

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:20am:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 5:12am:

Karnal wrote on Nov 17th, 2024 at 10:24pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 17th, 2024 at 3:57pm:
keep posting gweggy

the entire younger generation have heard her talk to rogan about treating shot up soldiers during her tours . soldiers shot up because the left have become warmongers

keep it up

should be good for another million lost by the left  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


The only leftie warmongers in Washington are the ones left over from the Bush-Cheney administration.

With the new administration, you're about to see what warmongers really look like. Don't believe me?

You'll see. Your DL's already got a new name for Palestine. Guess what it is.



dick cheney, warmonger extraordinaire, endorsed   HARRIS you dickhead  ;D ;D


Dick Cheney is:

a) not in Washington, and

b) not a lefty



thanks einstein

so why would a guy who LOVES war endorse harris?

maybe he thinks (since trump was the first president in 30 years not to start a war) his LOVE if war is better served by Harris  ::) ::)

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by aquascoot on Nov 18th, 2024 at 11:33am
why have the left become the warmongers??


from an NPR interview 2019 with gabbard

The 38-year-old is a major in the Hawaii Army National Guard and served two tours of duty in the Middle East, including in Baghdad in 2005. She said that the experience informed her concern about "wasteful regime change wars."

If there is a "Gabbard doctrine" about when, if ever, the U.S. should intervene overseas, it's clear the circumstances under which a President Gabbard would send U.S. forces are extremely limited. The only reason the U.S. should get involved, she said, is to keep the American people safe. While many presidents have interpreted that mandate quite expansively, Gabbard does not.

Asked if there are any wars in American history that she thinks were justifiable, she named only World War II.

"Unfortunately there are very few examples of this justified use of military force. I think it's very telling that the last time Congress officially declared war was World War II," said Gabbard.

When she talks about wars being costly, she's referring to both the human toll and the fiscal cost. Like candidate Bernie Sanders, whom she endorsed in 2016,[highlight] Gabbard says domestic priorities could get more funding if not for expensive foreign entanglements.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 18th, 2024 at 11:51am

aquascoot wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 11:25am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:20am:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 5:12am:

Karnal wrote on Nov 17th, 2024 at 10:24pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 17th, 2024 at 3:57pm:
keep posting gweggy

the entire younger generation have heard her talk to rogan about treating shot up soldiers during her tours . soldiers shot up because the left have become warmongers

keep it up

should be good for another million lost by the left  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


The only leftie warmongers in Washington are the ones left over from the Bush-Cheney administration.

With the new administration, you're about to see what warmongers really look like. Don't believe me?

You'll see. Your DL's already got a new name for Palestine. Guess what it is.



dick cheney, warmonger extraordinaire, endorsed   HARRIS you dickhead  ;D ;D


Dick Cheney is:

a) not in Washington, and

b) not a lefty



thanks einstein

so why would a guy who LOVES war endorse harris?


He loves donuts too, but he didn't endorse Harris in a bid to broaden the distribution of sweet pastries.

His endorsement was in opposition to Trump rather than support of Harris.

“He can never be trusted with power again,” the statement said. “As citizens, we each have a duty to put country above partisanship to defend our Constitution. That is why I will be casting my vote for Vice President Kamala Harris.”


Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 18th, 2024 at 11:53am

aquascoot wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 11:25am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:20am:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 5:12am:

Karnal wrote on Nov 17th, 2024 at 10:24pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 17th, 2024 at 3:57pm:
keep posting gweggy

the entire younger generation have heard her talk to rogan about treating shot up soldiers during her tours . soldiers shot up because the left have become warmongers

keep it up

should be good for another million lost by the left  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


The only leftie warmongers in Washington are the ones left over from the Bush-Cheney administration.

With the new administration, you're about to see what warmongers really look like. Don't believe me?

You'll see. Your DL's already got a new name for Palestine. Guess what it is.



dick cheney, warmonger extraordinaire, endorsed   HARRIS you dickhead  ;D ;D


Dick Cheney is:

a) not in Washington, and

b) not a lefty



thanks einstein


You obviously needed it explained to you.

Karnal clearly mentioned 'lefties in Washington'.

You, for some strange reason, changed the subject or just didn't know that Cheney isn't a lefty in Washington.

Maybe you should read more, or consider broadening your internet "news" searches.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 18th, 2024 at 12:35pm

aquascoot wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 11:33am:
why have the left become the warmongers??


Despite Trump (the rapist & convicted felon) being the supposed anti-war candidate, his nominated Secretary of Defense - Pete Hegseth - loved the Iraq War, advocated for strikes on Iran and North Korea and is generally a bloodthirsty warmonger.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by aquascoot on Nov 18th, 2024 at 12:46pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 11:53am:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 11:25am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:20am:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 5:12am:

Karnal wrote on Nov 17th, 2024 at 10:24pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 17th, 2024 at 3:57pm:
keep posting gweggy

the entire younger generation have heard her talk to rogan about treating shot up soldiers during her tours . soldiers shot up because the left have become warmongers

keep it up

should be good for another million lost by the left  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


The only leftie warmongers in Washington are the ones left over from the Bush-Cheney administration.

With the new administration, you're about to see what warmongers really look like. Don't believe me?

You'll see. Your DL's already got a new name for Palestine. Guess what it is.



dick cheney, warmonger extraordinaire, endorsed   HARRIS you dickhead  ;D ;D


Dick Cheney is:

a) not in Washington, and

b) not a lefty



thanks einstein


You obviously needed it explained to you.

Karnal clearly mentioned 'lefties in Washington'.

You, for some strange reason, changed the subject or just didn't know that Cheney isn't a lefty in Washington.

Maybe you should read more, or consider broadening your internet "news" searches.


do your news searches show who won the popular vote by 8 million.

do they confirm the only president in 30 years not to start a new war.

donny should win a nobel peace prize

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 18th, 2024 at 1:12pm

aquascoot wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 12:46pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 11:53am:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 11:25am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:20am:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 5:12am:

Karnal wrote on Nov 17th, 2024 at 10:24pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 17th, 2024 at 3:57pm:
keep posting gweggy

the entire younger generation have heard her talk to rogan about treating shot up soldiers during her tours . soldiers shot up because the left have become warmongers

keep it up

should be good for another million lost by the left  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


The only leftie warmongers in Washington are the ones left over from the Bush-Cheney administration.

With the new administration, you're about to see what warmongers really look like. Don't believe me?

You'll see. Your DL's already got a new name for Palestine. Guess what it is.



dick cheney, warmonger extraordinaire, endorsed   HARRIS you dickhead  ;D ;D


Dick Cheney is:

a) not in Washington, and

b) not a lefty



thanks einstein


You obviously needed it explained to you.

Karnal clearly mentioned 'lefties in Washington'.

You, for some strange reason, changed the subject or just didn't know that Cheney isn't a lefty in Washington.

Maybe you should read more, or consider broadening your internet "news" searches.


do your news searches show who won the popular vote by 8 million.

do they confirm the only president in 30 years not to start a new war.

donny should win a nobel peace prize


Proven wrong (yet again), so you change the subject to something completely different.

How very unlike you.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 18th, 2024 at 1:16pm

aquascoot wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 12:46pm:
do they confirm the only president in 30 years not to start a new war.


Nobody would confirm that, as it's quite clearly not true.



Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by thegreatdivide on Nov 18th, 2024 at 1:29pm

Panther wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 6:01pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 5:34pm:

Panther wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 5:11pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 4:46pm:

Panther wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 4:37pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 10:42pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 13th, 2024 at 1:01pm:
is given a top role in the administration.

great news


Tulsi smashed Kamala in 2020 debate for Democrat nominee

Tulsi quits democRats saying the swamp has corrupted them.

Democrats put Tulsi on terror watchlist as payback for quitting and speaking out.

Trump appoints her to lead the department who put her on this watchlist.  ;D

Tulsi has a long military career currently a Lt Col in reserves

She is my bet for first female POTUS


I'D SECOND THAT!!! 


So you're OK with her exposing the US government's complicity in endless wars? 

The lastest being the US triumphalism driving NATO's eastward expansion to Russia's borders, despite promising Russia that NATO wouldn't do that, after the collapse of the USSR. 


So you're insinuating that a female nominee, for an advisory role as Director of National Intelligence, that that nomination would be overtly understood as a move toward WWIII with a Nuclear Super-Power that the democ-RATS said the President was an ally of......impeached for.....based on their ironclad evidence of conspiring with only 3-4 years ago? 


No; I'm saying I like Gabbard's antiwar instincts - born out of experience -  and indeed Trump's own anti-war instincts if they are real ( eg "war is for losers" - you have to be alive to "do the deal"...),   as opposed to YOUR "freedom or death" ideology which condemns soldiers and civilians to death in endless insane wars.


My ideology......

I'd rather give my life fighting government than allowing government....any government.....be they domestic or foreign......to restrict my Freedoms & Liberty!!


Your error: your conception of your own  "freedoms and liberty", being naturally based in self-interest, doesn't necessarily accord with your neighbour's conception...

Hence government is required, to administer rule of law.

Surely it's better to change the law if necessary,  than to "give your life" for your own self-interested concept of "freedom".


Quote:
"When the People fear government there is Tyranny;
When government fears the People there is Freedom & Liberty!"


People don't NEED to fear good government, and good government doesn't fear the people. 


Quote:
Live free - or die...


Your error:  you can only be free - and alive - if everyone abides by rule of law.



Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Frank on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:00pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 1:29pm:

Panther wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 6:01pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 5:34pm:

Panther wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 5:11pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 4:46pm:

Panther wrote on Nov 16th, 2024 at 4:37pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 10:42pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 13th, 2024 at 1:01pm:
is given a top role in the administration.

great news


Tulsi smashed Kamala in 2020 debate for Democrat nominee

Tulsi quits democRats saying the swamp has corrupted them.

Democrats put Tulsi on terror watchlist as payback for quitting and speaking out.

Trump appoints her to lead the department who put her on this watchlist.  ;D

Tulsi has a long military career currently a Lt Col in reserves

She is my bet for first female POTUS


I'D SECOND THAT!!! 


So you're OK with her exposing the US government's complicity in endless wars? 

The lastest being the US triumphalism driving NATO's eastward expansion to Russia's borders, despite promising Russia that NATO wouldn't do that, after the collapse of the USSR. 


So you're insinuating that a female nominee, for an advisory role as Director of National Intelligence, that that nomination would be overtly understood as a move toward WWIII with a Nuclear Super-Power that the democ-RATS said the President was an ally of......impeached for.....based on their ironclad evidence of conspiring with only 3-4 years ago? 


No; I'm saying I like Gabbard's antiwar instincts - born out of experience -  and indeed Trump's own anti-war instincts if they are real ( eg "war is for losers" - you have to be alive to "do the deal"...),   as opposed to YOUR "freedom or death" ideology which condemns soldiers and civilians to death in endless insane wars.


My ideology......

I'd rather give my life fighting government than allowing government....any government.....be they domestic or foreign......to restrict my Freedoms & Liberty!!


Your error: your conception of your own  "freedoms and liberty", being naturally based in self-interest, doesn't necessarily accord with your neighbour's conception...

Hence government is required, to administer rule of law.

Surely it's better to change the law if necessary,  than to "give your life" for your own self-interested concept of "freedom".


Quote:
"When the People fear government there is Tyranny;
When government fears the People there is Freedom & Liberty!"


People don't NEED to fear good government, and good government doesn't fear the people. 

[quote] Live free - or die...


Your error:  you can only be free - and alive - if everyone abides by rule of law.


[/quote]
Your error : you are a blinkered idiotic parrot.


Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:04pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 1:16pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 12:46pm:
do they confirm the only president in 30 years not to start a new war.


Nobody would confirm that, as it's quite clearly not true.


I see scoot ran away from this one pretty quickly  :)

Title: Re: Tulsi Gobtard
Post by Dnarever on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:08pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 1:16pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 12:46pm:
do they confirm the only president in 30 years not to start a new war.


Nobody would confirm that, as it's quite clearly not true.


What new war did Biden start ? OH sorry that's right none.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gobtard
Post by Dnarever on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:09pm

Quote:
President Donald J. Trump's first war seemed a short one. To many, it commenced on April 7, 2017 (local time) and, after fifty-nine cruise missiles struck, seemingly ended the same day. The president received good marks for the stunning strike against the Syrian air base, with many members of the foreign policy establishment applauding his attack as a means of punishing Bashar al-Assad's regime for its use of chemical weapons. Even some Obama administration veterans were full of praise for the president, apparently drawing a contrast between President Donald J. Trump's strike and President Barack Obama's unwillingness to enforce his chemical weapons “red line.”

https://www.law.virginia.edu/scholarship/publication/saikrishna-prakash/642716

Title: Re: Tulsi Gobtard
Post by aquascoot on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:10pm

Dnarever wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 1:16pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 12:46pm:
do they confirm the only president in 30 years not to start a new war.


Nobody would confirm that, as it's quite clearly not true.


What new war did Biden start ? OH sorry that's right none.



hi dickhead

he has spent 100s of billions in the ukraine in a war that started during his term
he has spent nillions in gaza in a war that started during his term

how many wars  started between 2016 and 2020.

answer  nil

trump was the president of world peace

Title: Re: Tulsi Gobtard
Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:12pm

Dnarever wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 1:16pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 12:46pm:
do they confirm the only president in 30 years not to start a new war.


Nobody would confirm that, as it's quite clearly not true.


What new war did Biden start ? OH sorry that's right none.


Biden started no wars.

Not sure why scoot is unwilling to accept that fact.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gobtard
Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:13pm

aquascoot wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:10pm:

Dnarever wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 1:16pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 12:46pm:
do they confirm the only president in 30 years not to start a new war.


Nobody would confirm that, as it's quite clearly not true.


What new war did Biden start ? OH sorry that's right none.



hi dickhead

he has spent 100s of billions in the ukraine in a war that started during his term
he has spent nillions in gaza in a war that started during his term

how many wars  started between 2016 and 2020.

answer  nil

trump was the president of world peace


Ah.

Proven wrong, so you change the subject.

Don't you ever get tired of that tactic?

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Dnarever on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:24pm
Trump 2019:


Quote:
He understands that.  The war was going to be vicious and probably not very long.  And I’m very happy to have been involved in it, as are our Vice President, our Secretary of State, and all of the other people on our team. But by getting the ceasefire after a tremendous amount of really tough war for a very short period of days, that is something very special.

We’ve secured the oil, and, therefore, a small number of U.S. troops will remain in the area where they have the oil.  And we’re going to be protecting it, and we’ll be deciding what we’re going to do with it in the future.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gobtard
Post by Dnarever on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:29pm

aquascoot wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:10pm:

Dnarever wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 1:16pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 12:46pm:
do they confirm the only president in 30 years not to start a new war.


Nobody would confirm that, as it's quite clearly not true.


What new war did Biden start ? OH sorry that's right none.



hi dickhead

he has spent 100s of billions in the ukraine in a war that started during his term
he has spent nillions in gaza in a war that started during his term

how many wars  started between 2016 and 2020.

answer  nil

trump was the president of world peace


Trump sent a 400% increase in drone strikes over his first 12 months.

Russia invaded Ukraine what has that got to do with the US President. This false praise for Trump is retrospective and just coincidence. Trump tried his absolute best to start wars but was thwarted at every attempt.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gobtard
Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:35pm

aquascoot wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:10pm:
how many wars  started between 2016 and 2020.

answer  nil


2017  Afghanistan–Pakistan border war

2017–2020   Qatif war

2017   Marawi war

2017   Ambazonia war

2018   Catatumba war

Plus a few others.


Title: Re: Tulsi Gobtard
Post by Frank on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:38pm

Dnarever wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:29pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:10pm:

Dnarever wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 1:16pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 12:46pm:
do they confirm the only president in 30 years not to start a new war.


Nobody would confirm that, as it's quite clearly not true.


What new war did Biden start ? OH sorry that's right none.



hi dickhead

he has spent 100s of billions in the ukraine in a war that started during his term
he has spent nillions in gaza in a war that started during his term

how many wars  started between 2016 and 2020.

answer  nil

trump was the president of world peace


Trump sent a 400% increase in drone strikes over his first 12 months.

Where?

Don't be shy, duckwit, tell us.




Title: Re: Tulsi Gobtard
Post by Frank on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:40pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:35pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:10pm:
how many wars  started between 2016 and 2020.

answer  nil


2017  Afghanistan–Pakistan border war

2017–2020   Qatif war

2017   Marawi war

2017   Ambazonia war

2018   Catatumba war

Plus a few others.

US involvement?

Do tell us, despicable, stomach-turning creep.


Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:43pm

Trump pledged to stop 'endless wars' but his airstrikes in Afghanistan increased civilian deaths by 330% since 2016

Oh dear.

Under Donald Trump, drone strikes far exceed Obama’s numbers

The Trump administration has carried out 176 strikes in Yemen in just two years, compared with 154 there during all eight years of Obama’s tenure, according to a count by The Associated Press and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism.

Experts also say drone strikes under President Trump have surged in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria.


Title: Re: Tulsi Gobtard
Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:45pm

Frank wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:40pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:35pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:10pm:
how many wars  started between 2016 and 2020.

answer  nil


2017  Afghanistan–Pakistan border war

2017–2020   Qatif war

2017   Marawi war

2017   Ambazonia war

2018   Catatumba war

Plus a few others.

US involvement?

Do tell us, despicable, stomach-turning creep.


Proven wrong, so you change the subject.

How very scootish of you.

The question was quite clear: "how many wars  started between 2016 and 2020."


2017  Afghanistan–Pakistan border war

2017–2020   Qatif war

2017   Marawi war

2017   Ambazonia war

2018   Catatumba war

Plus a few others.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Frank on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:52pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:43pm:
Trump pledged to stop 'endless wars' but his airstrikes in Afghanistan increased civilian deaths by 330% since 2016

Oh dear.

Under Donald Trump, drone strikes far exceed Obama’s numbers

The Trump administration has carried out 176 strikes in Yemen in just two years, compared with 154 there during all eight years of Obama’s tenure, according to a count by The Associated Press and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism.

Experts also say drone strikes under President Trump have surged in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria.

1. Not a war Trump started.
2. Didn't bomb them anywhere near enough, as we now see.


So Trump, like O'bama and Boy Bush, was a pussy with the gruesome goatherds. 

And now half the bloody Afghan jihadi bastards are in Amrikkka as 'translators'.
Some are even here, while their wives and daughters are kept in pre-medieval conditions, selling their children to old goats.

Afghan - I can't think of a more depraved and base country. After 20 years of encouragement to get civilised they still went with t he Talibs.  Despicable.



Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 18th, 2024 at 9:12pm

Frank wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:52pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:43pm:
Trump pledged to stop 'endless wars' but his airstrikes in Afghanistan increased civilian deaths by 330% since 2016

Oh dear.

Under Donald Trump, drone strikes far exceed Obama’s numbers

The Trump administration has carried out 176 strikes in Yemen in just two years, compared with 154 there during all eight years of Obama’s tenure, according to a count by The Associated Press and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism.

Experts also say drone strikes under President Trump have surged in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria.

1. Not a war Trump started.


Proven wrong, so you change the subject.

How very scootish of you.


Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Frank on Nov 18th, 2024 at 9:16pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 9:12pm:

Frank wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:52pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:43pm:
Trump pledged to stop 'endless wars' but his airstrikes in Afghanistan increased civilian deaths by 330% since 2016

Oh dear.

Under Donald Trump, drone strikes far exceed Obama’s numbers

The Trump administration has carried out 176 strikes in Yemen in just two years, compared with 154 there during all eight years of Obama’s tenure, according to a count by The Associated Press and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism.

Experts also say drone strikes under President Trump have surged in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria.

1. Not a war Trump started.


Proven wrong, so you change the subject.

How very scootish of you.


You proved nothing but your total stupidity and lack of even a shrewd of good faith, despicable creep.


Selective editing of posts is not proof of anything else, creep.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 18th, 2024 at 10:48pm

Frank wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 9:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 9:12pm:

Frank wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:52pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:43pm:
Trump pledged to stop 'endless wars' but his airstrikes in Afghanistan increased civilian deaths by 330% since 2016

Oh dear.

Under Donald Trump, drone strikes far exceed Obama’s numbers

The Trump administration has carried out 176 strikes in Yemen in just two years, compared with 154 there during all eight years of Obama’s tenure, according to a count by The Associated Press and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism.

Experts also say drone strikes under President Trump have surged in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria.

1. Not a war Trump started.


Proven wrong, so you change the subject.

How very scootish of you.


You proved nothing but your total stupidity and lack of even a shrewd of good faith, despicable creep.


Selective editing of posts is not proof of anything else, creep.


Nobody said anything about wars started by the rapist.

You changed the subject because I proved you wrong.

It's what you do.


Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by aquascoot on Nov 19th, 2024 at 4:59am

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 9:12pm:

Frank wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:52pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:43pm:
Trump pledged to stop 'endless wars' but his airstrikes in Afghanistan increased civilian deaths by 330% since 2016

Oh dear.

Under Donald Trump, drone strikes far exceed Obama’s numbers

The Trump administration has carried out 176 strikes in Yemen in just two years, compared with 154 there during all eight years of Obama’s tenure, according to a count by The Associated Press and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism.

Experts also say drone strikes under President Trump have surged in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria.

1. Not a war Trump started.


Proven wrong, so you change the subject.

How very scootish of you.


correct

scoot and frank are into winning

gweggy is into wanking

off to harvey norman fpr you

put the keyboard in a yellow biohazard bag  ;D ;D

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by mothra on Nov 19th, 2024 at 7:17am

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 10:48pm:

Frank wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 9:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 9:12pm:

Frank wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:52pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:43pm:
Trump pledged to stop 'endless wars' but his airstrikes in Afghanistan increased civilian deaths by 330% since 2016

Oh dear.

Under Donald Trump, drone strikes far exceed Obama’s numbers

The Trump administration has carried out 176 strikes in Yemen in just two years, compared with 154 there during all eight years of Obama’s tenure, according to a count by The Associated Press and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism.

Experts also say drone strikes under President Trump have surged in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria.

1. Not a war Trump started.


Proven wrong, so you change the subject.

How very scootish of you.


You proved nothing but your total stupidity and lack of even a shrewd of good faith, despicable creep.


Selective editing of posts is not proof of anything else, creep.


Nobody said anything about wars started by the rapist.

You changed the subject because I proved you wrong.

It's what you do.



And who started the war in Yemen?

Greg, do you know if Trump has any personal ties with the Saudis?

I don't want to cast to side a net here but there some conflict of interest with the Saudis, isn't there? I mean, i'm thinking of a few very good examples.

And i didn't even mention Gaza.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by mothra on Nov 19th, 2024 at 7:21am

aquascoot wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 4:59am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 9:12pm:

Frank wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:52pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:43pm:
Trump pledged to stop 'endless wars' but his airstrikes in Afghanistan increased civilian deaths by 330% since 2016

Oh dear.

Under Donald Trump, drone strikes far exceed Obama’s numbers

The Trump administration has carried out 176 strikes in Yemen in just two years, compared with 154 there during all eight years of Obama’s tenure, according to a count by The Associated Press and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism.

Experts also say drone strikes under President Trump have surged in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria.

1. Not a war Trump started.


Proven wrong, so you change the subject.

How very scootish of you.


correct

scoot and frank are into winning

gweggy is into wanking

off to harvey norman fpr you

put the keyboard in a yellow biohazard bag  ;D ;D


If i were you, i would do a serious reflection on the value of what you think you are winning is.

Alas, i do believe that your idea of value and my idea of value are diametrically opposed to each other.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by MeisterEckhart on Nov 19th, 2024 at 7:27am

aquascoot wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 4:59am:
scoot and frank are into winning

Invite him to your farm... Find what or who he's into.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gobtard
Post by Frank on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:01am

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:45pm:

Frank wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:40pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:35pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:10pm:
how many wars  started between 2016 and 2020.

answer  nil


2017  Afghanistan–Pakistan border war

2017–2020   Qatif war

2017   Marawi war

2017   Ambazonia war

2018   Catatumba war

Plus a few others.

US involvement?

Do tell us, despicable, stomach-turning creep.


Proven wrong, so you change the subject.

How very scootish of you.

The question was quite clear: "how many wars  started between 2016 and 2020."


2017  Afghanistan–Pakistan border war

2017–2020   Qatif war

2017   Marawi war

2017   Ambazonia war

2018   Catatumba war

Plus a few others.

None of them started by Trump.



Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Gordon on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:04am
Wow, so many leftist racist misogynists here hating on a strong intelligent woman of colour.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by mothra on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:06am

Gordon wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:04am:
Wow, so many leftist racist misogynists here hating on a strong intelligent woman of colour.



Your lie speaks more starkly of you than those you aim to decry.

But what else is new with you?

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by MeisterEckhart on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:08am

mothra wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:06am:

Gordon wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:04am:
Wow, so many leftist racist misogynists here hating on a strong intelligent woman of colour.



Your lie speaks more starkly of you than those you aim to decry.

But what else is new with you?

Sh!t smearing again...

I guess you'll be storming out soon.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by mothra on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:09am

MeisterEckhart wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:08am:

mothra wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:06am:

Gordon wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:04am:
Wow, so many leftist racist misogynists here hating on a strong intelligent woman of colour.



Your lie speaks more starkly of you than those you aim to decry.

But what else is new with you?

Sh!t smearing again...

I guess you'll be storming out soon.



Are you still sulking? I gave you the last word and all!

Would it help if you talk about my hair?

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by MeisterEckhart on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:12am

mothra wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:09am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:08am:

mothra wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:06am:

Gordon wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:04am:
Wow, so many leftist racist misogynists here hating on a strong intelligent woman of colour.



Your lie speaks more starkly of you than those you aim to decry.

But what else is new with you?

Sh!t smearing again...

I guess you'll be storming out soon.



Are you still sulking? I gave you the last word and all!

Would it help if you talk about my hair?

And again. How worthless has your life been?

Kids on meth?

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Gordon on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:13am

mothra wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:06am:

Gordon wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:04am:
Wow, so many leftist racist misogynists here hating on a strong intelligent woman of colour.



Your lie speaks more starkly of you than those you aim to decry.

But what else is new with you?


Before long, Greg will find a picture of a sex doll that looks like here, and you'll clap along because you're a fake and a fraud, and a misogynist.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:20am

Gordon wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:04am:
Wow, so many leftist racist misogynists here hating on a strong intelligent woman of colour.


Lol   ;D

Nobody is interested in her gender or skin colour.

She's just a horrible human being, is all.

Projection much?

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by mothra on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:20am

MeisterEckhart wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:12am:

mothra wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:09am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:08am:

mothra wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:06am:

Gordon wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:04am:
Wow, so many leftist racist misogynists here hating on a strong intelligent woman of colour.



Your lie speaks more starkly of you than those you aim to decry.

But what else is new with you?

Sh!t smearing again...

I guess you'll be storming out soon.



Are you still sulking? I gave you the last word and all!

Would it help if you talk about my hair?

And again. How worthless has your life been?

Kids on meth?


Well that's some telling blank filling.

Why do you strive so hard to belittle anyone who disagrees with you on anything, Ecky?

Like, above as a stand out proof positive, what is it about you that makes you feel the need to relegate absolutely everyone who stands in your way to the lowest of the low? You even go so far as to apply their ideologies to them.

You've "diagnosed" half the forum!

I'm putting it right here that it reveals more of you than anyone else.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by mothra on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:23am

Gordon wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:13am:

mothra wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:06am:

Gordon wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:04am:
Wow, so many leftist racist misogynists here hating on a strong intelligent woman of colour.



Your lie speaks more starkly of you than those you aim to decry.

But what else is new with you?


Before long, Greg will find a picture of a sex doll that looks like here, and you'll clap along because you're a fake and a fraud, and a misogynist.



Why do you just lie?

Is it because you know your position is flimsy or because you think you're beyond reproach?

Little from columns a and be perhaps?

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by MeisterEckhart on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:24am

mothra wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:20am:
Well that's some telling blank filling.

Why do you strive so hard to belittle anyone who disagrees with you on anything, Ecky?

Like, above as a stand out proof positive, what is it about you that makes you feel the need to relegate absolutely everyone who stands in your way to the lowest of the low? You even go so far as to apply their ideologies to them.

You've "diagnosed" half the forum!

I'm putting it right here that it reveals more of you than anyone else.

Many people disagree with me here.

What some do, like yourself, is sh!t smear... Check out your posts... Nearly all of them include it unless you're agreeing with someone about what a c~nt some other poster is.


Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by mothra on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:34am

MeisterEckhart wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:24am:

mothra wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:20am:
Well that's some telling blank filling.

Why do you strive so hard to belittle anyone who disagrees with you on anything, Ecky?

Like, above as a stand out proof positive, what is it about you that makes you feel the need to relegate absolutely everyone who stands in your way to the lowest of the low? You even go so far as to apply their ideologies to them.

You've "diagnosed" half the forum!

I'm putting it right here that it reveals more of you than anyone else.

Many people disagree with me here.

What some do, like yourself, is sh!t smear... Check out your posts... Nearly all of them include it unless you're agreeing with someone about what a c~nt some other poster is.


Nah. You've just a particularly fragile ego. I happen to hand you your arse with regularity. I honestly don't know why you still engage me.

See, you're clever, but not in a particularly clever way. You know facts, most of which i'm convinced are recently googled, but you're footless outside of those facts.

Hence your regularly employed Motte and Baily fallacy.

Bottom line is you want an audience who congratulates you for being clever. You're not here for debate. Anything that veers outside of you being congratulated for being clever gets diminished by ludicrous stereotype.

And it all comes down to one thing:

Fragile ego.





Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by MeisterEckhart on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:39am

mothra wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:34am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:24am:

mothra wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:20am:
Well that's some telling blank filling.

Why do you strive so hard to belittle anyone who disagrees with you on anything, Ecky?

Like, above as a stand out proof positive, what is it about you that makes you feel the need to relegate absolutely everyone who stands in your way to the lowest of the low? You even go so far as to apply their ideologies to them.

You've "diagnosed" half the forum!

I'm putting it right here that it reveals more of you than anyone else.

Many people disagree with me here.

What some do, like yourself, is sh!t smear... Check out your posts... Nearly all of them include it unless you're agreeing with someone about what a c~nt some other poster is.


Nah. You've just a particularly fragile ego. I happen to hand you your arse with regularity. I honestly don't know why you still engage me.

See, you're clever, but not in a particularly clever way. You know facts, most of which i'm convinced are recently googled, but you're footless outside of those facts.

Hence your regularly employed Motte and Baily fallacy.

Bottom line is you want an audience who congratulates you for being clever. You're not here for debate. Anything that veers outside of you being congratulated for being clever gets diminished by ludicrous stereotype.

And it all comes down to one thing:

Fragile ego.

So you accuse others of playing 'psychologist' and 'diagnosing' posters, then do it yourself.

What do you blue hairs call that?

You haven't stormed out yet, but... Why is that?


Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Frank on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:43am

MeisterEckhart wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:24am:

mothra wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:20am:
Well that's some telling blank filling.

Why do you strive so hard to belittle anyone who disagrees with you on anything, Ecky?

Like, above as a stand out proof positive, what is it about you that makes you feel the need to relegate absolutely everyone who stands in your way to the lowest of the low? You even go so far as to apply their ideologies to them.

You've "diagnosed" half the forum!

I'm putting it right here that it reveals more of you than anyone else.

Many people disagree with me here.


And your Pavlovian reflex response is to imply sexual deviance and racial inferiority.


Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by mothra on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:45am

MeisterEckhart wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:39am:

mothra wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:34am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:24am:

mothra wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:20am:
Well that's some telling blank filling.

Why do you strive so hard to belittle anyone who disagrees with you on anything, Ecky?

Like, above as a stand out proof positive, what is it about you that makes you feel the need to relegate absolutely everyone who stands in your way to the lowest of the low? You even go so far as to apply their ideologies to them.

You've "diagnosed" half the forum!

I'm putting it right here that it reveals more of you than anyone else.

Many people disagree with me here.

What some do, like yourself, is sh!t smear... Check out your posts... Nearly all of them include it unless you're agreeing with someone about what a c~nt some other poster is.


Nah. You've just a particularly fragile ego. I happen to hand you your arse with regularity. I honestly don't know why you still engage me.

See, you're clever, but not in a particularly clever way. You know facts, most of which i'm convinced are recently googled, but you're footless outside of those facts.

Hence your regularly employed Motte and Baily fallacy.

Bottom line is you want an audience who congratulates you for being clever. You're not here for debate. Anything that veers outside of you being congratulated for being clever gets diminished by ludicrous stereotype.

And it all comes down to one thing:

Fragile ego.

So you accuse others of playing 'psychologist' and 'diagnosing' posters, then do it yourself.

What do you blue hairs call that?

You haven't stormed out yet, but... Why is that?



Where did i diagnose you?

And don;t misinterpret knowing when to leave with storming out. You've never raised my resting pulse.

I simply am not as interested in you at having the last word.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by MeisterEckhart on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:47am

Frank wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:43am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:24am:

mothra wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:20am:
Well that's some telling blank filling.

Why do you strive so hard to belittle anyone who disagrees with you on anything, Ecky?

Like, above as a stand out proof positive, what is it about you that makes you feel the need to relegate absolutely everyone who stands in your way to the lowest of the low? You even go so far as to apply their ideologies to them.

You've "diagnosed" half the forum!

I'm putting it right here that it reveals more of you than anyone else.

Many people disagree with me here.


And your Pavlovian reflex response is to imply sexual deviance and racial inferiority.

I read your posts and their obsession with calling other posters trouser sniffers, public toilet loiterers etc...

Made me wonder why, from the education system, you 'retired' early... apparently.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Dnarever on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:50am

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:20am:

Gordon wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:04am:
Wow, so many leftist racist misogynists here hating on a strong intelligent woman of colour.


Lol   ;D

Nobody is interested in her gender or skin colour.

She's just a horrible human being, is all.

Projection much?


Correct. Its about her performance and character or more accurately the lack of it.

Didn't even consider that she has a colour.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by MeisterEckhart on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:50am

mothra wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:45am:
And don;t misinterpret knowing when to leave with storming out.

I simply am not as interested in you at having the last word.

After one last sh!t smear, that is.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gobtard
Post by Dnarever on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:53am

Frank wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:01am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:45pm:

Frank wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:40pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:35pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:10pm:
how many wars  started between 2016 and 2020.

answer  nil


2017  Afghanistan–Pakistan border war

2017–2020   Qatif war

2017   Marawi war

2017   Ambazonia war

2018   Catatumba war

Plus a few others.

US involvement?

Do tell us, despicable, stomach-turning creep.


Proven wrong, so you change the subject.

How very scootish of you.

The question was quite clear: "how many wars  started between 2016 and 2020."


2017  Afghanistan–Pakistan border war

2017–2020   Qatif war

2017   Marawi war

2017   Ambazonia war

2018   Catatumba war

Plus a few others.

None of them started by Trump.


And back in the loop to none started by Biden.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gobtard
Post by mothra on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:00am

Dnarever wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:53am:

Frank wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:01am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:45pm:

Frank wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:40pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:35pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:10pm:
how many wars  started between 2016 and 2020.

answer  nil


2017  Afghanistan–Pakistan border war

2017–2020   Qatif war

2017   Marawi war

2017   Ambazonia war

2018   Catatumba war

Plus a few others.

US involvement?

Do tell us, despicable, stomach-turning creep.


Proven wrong, so you change the subject.

How very scootish of you.

The question was quite clear: "how many wars  started between 2016 and 2020."


2017  Afghanistan–Pakistan border war

2017–2020   Qatif war

2017   Marawi war

2017   Ambazonia war

2018   Catatumba war

Plus a few others.

None of them started by Trump.


And back in the loop to none started by Biden.


Completely lost on them. All of it.

It's all about culture wars. That's precisely all they care about. Corruption, dishonestly, insurrection, felony, treason .... means nothing to them.

Just so long as their culture wars are stoked.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:03am

Dnarever wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:50am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:20am:

Gordon wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:04am:
Wow, so many leftist racist misogynists here hating on a strong intelligent woman of colour.


Lol   ;D

Nobody is interested in her gender or skin colour.

She's just a horrible human being, is all.

Projection much?


Correct. Its about her performance and character or more accurately the lack of it.

Didn't even consider that she has a colour.


Nor me   :-/

It's just distraction and projection from the right.

Gabbard is just a horrible person, and even her own father is distancing himself from her now.


Title: Re: Tulsi Gobtard
Post by MeisterEckhart on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:06am

mothra wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:00am:
It's all about culture wars.

Just so long as their culture wars are stoked.

That would be whatever the left has become for at least the last 10 years.

Culminating in Tavistock.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gobtard
Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:06am

Dnarever wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:53am:

Frank wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:01am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:45pm:

Frank wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:40pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:35pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:10pm:
how many wars  started between 2016 and 2020.

answer  nil


2017  Afghanistan–Pakistan border war

2017–2020   Qatif war

2017   Marawi war

2017   Ambazonia war

2018   Catatumba war

Plus a few others.

US involvement?

Do tell us, despicable, stomach-turning creep.


Proven wrong, so you change the subject.

How very scootish of you.

The question was quite clear: "how many wars  started between 2016 and 2020."


2017  Afghanistan–Pakistan border war

2017–2020   Qatif war

2017   Marawi war

2017   Ambazonia war

2018   Catatumba war

Plus a few others.

None of them started by Trump.


And back in the loop to none started by Biden.


It's almost as if they have a double standard.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gobtard
Post by mothra on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:08am

MeisterEckhart wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:06am:

mothra wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:00am:
It's all about culture wars.

Just so long as their culture wars are stoked.

That would be whatever the left has become for at least the last 10 years.

Culminating in Tavistock.


Following scientific and academic advice doesn't mean succumbing to culture wars, Ecky.

Having a hissy fit about it? Well, that's starting to get there.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gobtard
Post by MeisterEckhart on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:19am

mothra wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:08am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:06am:

mothra wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:00am:
It's all about culture wars.

Just so long as their culture wars are stoked.

That would be whatever the left has become for at least the last 10 years.

Culminating in Tavistock.


Following scientific and academic advice doesn't mean succumbing to culture wars, Ecky.

Having a hissy fit about it? Well, that's starting to get there.

You'll know when mandatory pronoun declarations are quietly dropped that the world is turning against the depraved madness of the last 10+ years.

About the time when those in the medical profession face malpractice lawsuits or are charged with criminal behaviour across the Anglosphere, as is already happening in the UK and Europe.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gobtard
Post by mothra on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:31am

MeisterEckhart wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:19am:

mothra wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:08am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:06am:

mothra wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:00am:
It's all about culture wars.

Just so long as their culture wars are stoked.

That would be whatever the left has become for at least the last 10 years.

Culminating in Tavistock.


Following scientific and academic advice doesn't mean succumbing to culture wars, Ecky.

Having a hissy fit about it? Well, that's starting to get there.

You'll know when mandatory pronoun declarations are quietly dropped that the world is turning against the depraved madness of the last 10+ years.

About the time when those in the medical profession face malpractice lawsuits or are charged with criminal behaviour across the Anglosphere, as is already happening in the UK and Europe.



Nah i already know. By the inclusive and diverse community i live in. And i know by knowing how many more like them there are.

Nobody is going away. You simply need to decide whether you'[re up for hate crimes or not.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Frank on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:46am

MeisterEckhart wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:47am:

Frank wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:43am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:24am:

mothra wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:20am:
Well that's some telling blank filling.

Why do you strive so hard to belittle anyone who disagrees with you on anything, Ecky?

Like, above as a stand out proof positive, what is it about you that makes you feel the need to relegate absolutely everyone who stands in your way to the lowest of the low? You even go so far as to apply their ideologies to them.

You've "diagnosed" half the forum!

I'm putting it right here that it reveals more of you than anyone else.

Many people disagree with me here.


And your Pavlovian reflex response is to imply sexual deviance and racial inferiority.

I read your posts and their obsession with calling other posters trouser sniffers, public toilet loiterers etc...

Only karnal.


Title: Re: Tulsi Gobtard
Post by MeisterEckhart on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:49am

mothra wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:31am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:19am:

mothra wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:08am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:06am:

mothra wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:00am:
It's all about culture wars.

Just so long as their culture wars are stoked.

That would be whatever the left has become for at least the last 10 years.

Culminating in Tavistock.


Following scientific and academic advice doesn't mean succumbing to culture wars, Ecky.

Having a hissy fit about it? Well, that's starting to get there.

You'll know when mandatory pronoun declarations are quietly dropped that the world is turning against the depraved madness of the last 10+ years.

About the time when those in the medical profession face malpractice lawsuits or are charged with criminal behaviour across the Anglosphere, as is already happening in the UK and Europe.



Nah i already know. By the inclusive and diverse community i live in. And i know by knowing how many more like them there are.

Nobody is going away. You simply need to decide whether you'[re up for hate crimes or not.

I'm sure you'll find a bubble to live in... in some back-alley cafe or last-standing wine bar.

The Zoomers, whose coming-of-age around 2015, started these trends, is not only the smallest generation but they're destined to have the least effect on culture once the bulge effect of their temporary youth passes.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gobtard
Post by Frank on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:52am

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:06am:

Dnarever wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:53am:

Frank wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:01am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:45pm:

Frank wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:40pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:35pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:10pm:
how many wars  started between 2016 and 2020.

answer  nil


2017  Afghanistan–Pakistan border war

2017–2020   Qatif war

2017   Marawi war

2017   Ambazonia war

2018   Catatumba war

Plus a few others.

US involvement?

Do tell us, despicable, stomach-turning creep.


Proven wrong, so you change the subject.

How very scootish of you.

The question was quite clear: "how many wars  started between 2016 and 2020."


2017  Afghanistan–Pakistan border war

2017–2020   Qatif war

2017   Marawi war

2017   Ambazonia war

2018   Catatumba war

Plus a few others.

None of them started by Trump.


And back in the loop to none started by Biden.


It's almost as if they have a double standard.

Ukraine war is a huge US/ NATO failure. Started and has been going on exclusively on Biden's watch.

Afghan withdrawal - disastrous, dishonourable. Biden's doing.

Iran's regained ability to run Hamas and Hezb'allah - Biden's doing.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by MeisterEckhart on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:52am

Frank wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:46am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:47am:

Frank wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:43am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:24am:

mothra wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:20am:
Well that's some telling blank filling.

Why do you strive so hard to belittle anyone who disagrees with you on anything, Ecky?

Like, above as a stand out proof positive, what is it about you that makes you feel the need to relegate absolutely everyone who stands in your way to the lowest of the low? You even go so far as to apply their ideologies to them.

You've "diagnosed" half the forum!

I'm putting it right here that it reveals more of you than anyone else.

Many people disagree with me here.


And your Pavlovian reflex response is to imply sexual deviance and racial inferiority.

I read your posts and their obsession with calling other posters trouser sniffers, public toilet loiterers etc...

Only karnal.

Don't know if it was only Karnal...

then the bitchy fag sh!t of creep, turd etc, etc...

Then the Agatha persona...

On it goes.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Frank on Nov 19th, 2024 at 11:06am

MeisterEckhart wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:52am:

Frank wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:46am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:47am:

Frank wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:43am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:24am:

mothra wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:20am:
Well that's some telling blank filling.

Why do you strive so hard to belittle anyone who disagrees with you on anything, Ecky?

Like, above as a stand out proof positive, what is it about you that makes you feel the need to relegate absolutely everyone who stands in your way to the lowest of the low? You even go so far as to apply their ideologies to them.

You've "diagnosed" half the forum!

I'm putting it right here that it reveals more of you than anyone else.

Many people disagree with me here.


And your Pavlovian reflex response is to imply sexual deviance and racial inferiority.

I read your posts and their obsession with calling other posters trouser sniffers, public toilet loiterers etc...

Only karnal.

Don't know if it was only Karnal...

then the bitchy fag sh!t of creep, turd etc, etc...

A spade is a spade, a creep is a creep.


Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by MeisterEckhart on Nov 19th, 2024 at 11:08am

Frank wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 11:06am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:52am:

Frank wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:46am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:47am:

Frank wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:43am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:24am:

mothra wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:20am:
Well that's some telling blank filling.

Why do you strive so hard to belittle anyone who disagrees with you on anything, Ecky?

Like, above as a stand out proof positive, what is it about you that makes you feel the need to relegate absolutely everyone who stands in your way to the lowest of the low? You even go so far as to apply their ideologies to them.

You've "diagnosed" half the forum!

I'm putting it right here that it reveals more of you than anyone else.

Many people disagree with me here.


And your Pavlovian reflex response is to imply sexual deviance and racial inferiority.

I read your posts and their obsession with calling other posters trouser sniffers, public toilet loiterers etc...

Only karnal.

Don't know if it was only Karnal...

then the bitchy fag sh!t of creep, turd etc, etc...

A spade is a spade, a creep is a creep.

A crossdressing 'retired' teacher is well... y'know.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by philperth2010 on Nov 19th, 2024 at 11:46am
Well Tulsi Gabbard couldn't be as bad as Michael Flynn or Steve Bannon or a host of other drop kicks Trump appointed in his first term....It is better to judge people on their actions rather than their words....I believe she will try to do a good job and her boss is alligned with her sympathies for Russia....America voted for Trump knowing he admires Putin so this appointment is not suprising....I will wait and see what happens before passing judgement???

:-? :-? :-?

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Kaleb Pohlhaus on Nov 19th, 2024 at 11:53am

Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 15th, 2024 at 10:42pm:
She is my bet for first female POTUS


Shes kinda manly, dont ya think??

But hey, bet shed be wild in bed.

A full on banshee or somethin!! 😏

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Frank on Nov 19th, 2024 at 12:23pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 11:08am:

Frank wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 11:06am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:52am:

Frank wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:46am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:47am:

Frank wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:43am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:24am:

mothra wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:20am:
Well that's some telling blank filling.

Why do you strive so hard to belittle anyone who disagrees with you on anything, Ecky?

Like, above as a stand out proof positive, what is it about you that makes you feel the need to relegate absolutely everyone who stands in your way to the lowest of the low? You even go so far as to apply their ideologies to them.

You've "diagnosed" half the forum!

I'm putting it right here that it reveals more of you than anyone else.

Many people disagree with me here.


And your Pavlovian reflex response is to imply sexual deviance and racial inferiority.

I read your posts and their obsession with calling other posters trouser sniffers, public toilet loiterers etc...

Only karnal.

Don't know if it was only Karnal...

then the bitchy fag sh!t of creep, turd etc, etc...

A spade is a spade, a creep is a creep.

A crossdressing 'retired' teacher is well... y'know.

Silly, inane bollocks, Icky.

Agatha Gregson, née Wooster, later Lady Worplesdon, is a recurring fictional character in the Jeeves stories of the British comic writer P. G. Wodehouse, being best known as Bertie Wooster's Aunt Agatha.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by MeisterEckhart on Nov 19th, 2024 at 12:29pm

Frank wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 12:23pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 11:08am:

Frank wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 11:06am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:52am:

Frank wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:46am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:47am:

Frank wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:43am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:24am:

mothra wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:20am:
Well that's some telling blank filling.

Why do you strive so hard to belittle anyone who disagrees with you on anything, Ecky?

Like, above as a stand out proof positive, what is it about you that makes you feel the need to relegate absolutely everyone who stands in your way to the lowest of the low? You even go so far as to apply their ideologies to them.

You've "diagnosed" half the forum!

I'm putting it right here that it reveals more of you than anyone else.

Many people disagree with me here.


And your Pavlovian reflex response is to imply sexual deviance and racial inferiority.

I read your posts and their obsession with calling other posters trouser sniffers, public toilet loiterers etc...

Only karnal.

Don't know if it was only Karnal...

then the bitchy fag sh!t of creep, turd etc, etc...

A spade is a spade, a creep is a creep.

A crossdressing 'retired' teacher is well... y'know.

Silly, inane bollocks, Icky.

Agatha Gregson, née Wooster, later Lady Worplesdon, is a recurring fictional character in the Jeeves stories of the British comic writer P. G. Wodehouse, being best known as Bertie Wooster's Aunt Agatha.

Yep... Nothing gay about that!!??

Were you 'Bertie' as well?

Title: Re: Tulsi Gobtard
Post by Dnarever on Nov 19th, 2024 at 2:34pm

Frank wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:52am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 10:06am:

Dnarever wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:53am:

Frank wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:01am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:45pm:

Frank wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:40pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:35pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:10pm:
how many wars  started between 2016 and 2020.

answer  nil


2017  Afghanistan–Pakistan border war

2017–2020   Qatif war

2017   Marawi war

2017   Ambazonia war

2018   Catatumba war

Plus a few others.

US involvement?

Do tell us, despicable, stomach-turning creep.


Proven wrong, so you change the subject.

How very scootish of you.

The question was quite clear: "how many wars  started between 2016 and 2020."


2017  Afghanistan–Pakistan border war

2017–2020   Qatif war

2017   Marawi war

2017   Ambazonia war

2018   Catatumba war

Plus a few others.

None of them started by Trump.


And back in the loop to none started by Biden.


It's almost as if they have a double standard.

Ukraine war is a huge US/ NATO failure. Started and has been going on exclusively on Biden's watch.

Afghan withdrawal - disastrous, dishonourable. Biden's doing.

Iran's regained ability to run Hamas and Hezb'allah - Biden's doing.



Quote:
on Biden's watch


Yet one step back in the cycle on Trumps watch doesn't count ?


Quote:
It's almost as if they have a double standard


No - no almost about it - they do have a double standard.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gobtard
Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 19th, 2024 at 2:35pm

Dnarever wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:53am:

Frank wrote on Nov 19th, 2024 at 9:01am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:45pm:

Frank wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:40pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:35pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 8:10pm:
how many wars  started between 2016 and 2020.

answer  nil


2017  Afghanistan–Pakistan border war

2017–2020   Qatif war

2017   Marawi war

2017   Ambazonia war

2018   Catatumba war

Plus a few others.

US involvement?

Do tell us, despicable, stomach-turning creep.


Proven wrong, so you change the subject.

How very scootish of you.

The question was quite clear: "how many wars  started between 2016 and 2020."


2017  Afghanistan–Pakistan border war

2017–2020   Qatif war

2017   Marawi war

2017   Ambazonia war

2018   Catatumba war

Plus a few others.

None of them started by Trump.


And back in the loop to none started by Biden.


Correct.

No wars have been started by Biden.


Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Frank on Dec 30th, 2024 at 4:37pm



https://youtube.com/shorts/x20m10naixo?si=dA4EbqNxFLuVeh9D

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Dec 30th, 2024 at 4:40pm

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Karnal on Dec 30th, 2024 at 10:44pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2024 at 4:40pm:


Did, Greggery. Tucker's been chucked off Fox News for spreading Russian propaganda and defamatory disinformation.

Tucker's now freelancing on X, with Tulsi in tow. Put Tulsi in charge of US intelligence, and the big fella finally has his Russian back channel - right in the heart of the Five Eyes intelligence-sharing apparatus, Australia included.

DEEP STATE !!!

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Dnarever on Dec 30th, 2024 at 11:11pm
Tulsi was brought up a republican

She switched from Republican to Green

She went from Green to Progressive ( Elected as a progressive no corporate pac money)

She immediately after election went  from Progressive to corporate (give me the money) Democrat.

She went from Corporate (Give me the PAC money) Democrat to Independent.

She went from Independent to Republican.

She went from Republican to MAGA nut.

This happened in 1 term. (2021 to 2024)

Not sure how anyone could trust this political mercenary.

Not sure if she stands for everything or nothing, maybe its just about the money ?

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Dnarever on Dec 30th, 2024 at 11:17pm
Associating Tulsi with intelligence sounds rather oxymoronic, possibly without the oxy.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Dec 31st, 2024 at 8:47am

Dnarever wrote on Dec 30th, 2024 at 11:11pm:
Tulsi was brought up a republican

She switched from Republican to Green

She went from Green to Progressive ( Elected as a progressive no corporate pac money)

She immediately after election went  from Progressive to corporate (give me the money) Democrat.

She went from Corporate (Give me the PAC money) Democrat to Independent.

She went from Independent to Republican.

She went from Republican to MAGA nut.

This happened in 1 term. (2021 to 2024)

Not sure how anyone could trust this political mercenary.

Not sure if she stands for everything or nothing, maybe its just about the money ?


Looks like Tulsi couldn't care less about other Americans, and just wants what's best for Tulsi.

No wonder she gets on well with Diaper Don.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Frank on Jan 13th, 2025 at 9:03am
Hillary Clinton Accidentally Posts Condolences For Tulsi Gabbard's Suicide One Day Early


Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 13th, 2025 at 9:07am

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by aquascoot on Jan 13th, 2025 at 1:47pm
great chick and will get the credit for ending the lefties war in the ukraine


Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 13th, 2025 at 2:04pm

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by aquascoot on Jan 13th, 2025 at 2:38pm
she s a winner

maybe the only democrat who isnt currently despised by the public

she will get so sick of winning  :D :D :D

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 13th, 2025 at 2:56pm

aquascoot wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 2:38pm:
she s a winner

maybe the only democrat who isnt currently despised by the public


She's a Republican.

FFS, try to keep up old boy   ::)

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Karnal on Jan 13th, 2025 at 5:27pm

aquascoot wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 2:38pm:
she s a winner

maybe the only democrat who isnt currently despised by the public

she will get so sick of winning  :D :D :D


So will we. Every piece of intelligence Australia shares with the US now goes from Tulsi to Vlad, then straight to the "noble Xi".

Something tells me that's what you wanted all along, no? A Russian mole, right in the heart of  the US Intelligence apparatus.

DEEP STATE !!!

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Leroy on Jan 13th, 2025 at 5:29pm

Karnal wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 5:27pm:

aquascoot wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 2:38pm:
she s a winner

maybe the only democrat who isnt currently despised by the public

she will get so sick of winning  :D :D :D


So will we. Every piece of intelligence Australia shares with the US now goes from Tulsi to Vlad, then straight to the "noble Xi".

Something tells me that's what you wanted all along, no? A Russian mole, right in the heart of  the US Intelligence apparatus.

DEEP STATE !!!


OH so now you hate the freedom of speech and promote censorship.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 13th, 2025 at 5:33pm

Karnal wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 5:27pm:

aquascoot wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 2:38pm:
she s a winner

maybe the only democrat who isnt currently despised by the public

she will get so sick of winning  :D :D :D


So will we. Every piece of intelligence Australia shares with the US now goes from Tulsi to Vlad, then straight to the "noble Xi".

Something tells me that's what you wanted all along, no? A Russian mole, right in the heart of  the US Intelligence apparatus.

DEEP STATE !!!


She's a mole alright.


Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Karnal on Jan 13th, 2025 at 5:45pm

Leroy wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 5:29pm:

Karnal wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 5:27pm:

aquascoot wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 2:38pm:
she s a winner

maybe the only democrat who isnt currently despised by the public

she will get so sick of winning  :D :D :D


So will we. Every piece of intelligence Australia shares with the US now goes from Tulsi to Vlad, then straight to the "noble Xi".

Something tells me that's what you wanted all along, no? A Russian mole, right in the heart of  the US Intelligence apparatus.

DEEP STATE !!!


OH so now you hate the freedom of speech and promote censorship.


Never ever, Leroy. We've always wanted Australian intellectual property, ASIO files and federal cabinet minutes handed over to the CCP.

I mean, what are the CSIRO, ASIO and the federal government saying that's so important, anyway?

You'd certainly hope Chi-na gets the right targets for it's next lab-made virus, no?

Tulsi stands to make a nice little drink on the blackmail.

VENGEANCE !!!

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by aquascoot on Jan 13th, 2025 at 6:05pm
her interview with rogan went stratospheric.

she can do no wrong

it pays to be good at podcasts in the era of podcasts

JD was epic as well


who do the left have who can be interesting for 3 hours?

gavin??
gav_001.jpg (50 KB | 2 )

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Leroy on Jan 13th, 2025 at 6:09pm

Karnal wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 5:45pm:

Leroy wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 5:29pm:

Karnal wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 5:27pm:

aquascoot wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 2:38pm:
she s a winner

maybe the only democrat who isnt currently despised by the public

she will get so sick of winning  :D :D :D


So will we. Every piece of intelligence Australia shares with the US now goes from Tulsi to Vlad, then straight to the "noble Xi".

Something tells me that's what you wanted all along, no? A Russian mole, right in the heart of  the US Intelligence apparatus.

DEEP STATE !!!


OH so now you hate the freedom of speech and promote censorship.


Never ever, Leroy. We've always wanted Australian intellectual property, ASIO files and federal cabinet minutes handed over to the CCP.

I mean, what are the CSIRO, ASIO and the federal government saying that's so important, anyway?

You'd certainly hope Chi-na gets the right targets for it's next lab-made virus, no?

Tulsi stands to make a nice little drink on the blackmail.

VENGEANCE !!!


Your all over the place like a drunk, are you now saying that Chine made and released covid. Its hard to keep up.

So what if Tulsi makes a little on the side, at least she cut out the middle man Hunter.

You don't like to see women flex a bit and act like men do you.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 13th, 2025 at 6:16pm

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Leroy on Jan 13th, 2025 at 6:18pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 6:16pm:


Does this mean that Hillary Clinton has contacts in the Kremlin, otherwise how would she know?.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 13th, 2025 at 6:23pm

Leroy wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 6:18pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 6:16pm:


Does this mean that Hillary Clinton has contacts in the Kremlin, otherwise how would she know?.


The same way the rest of us know.

Russian news and propaganda sites often reported on Gabbard’s campaign, and moments in Gabbard’s (failed) campaign were amplified by trolls and bots on Twitter with ties to Russia.

Try to keep up, old boy.

She's a mole.

Hard to imagine, but she's probably swallowed more Putin jizz than Trump has.


Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Leroy on Jan 13th, 2025 at 6:26pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 6:23pm:

Leroy wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 6:18pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 6:16pm:


Does this mean that Hillary Clinton has contacts in the Kremlin, otherwise how would she know?.


The same way the rest of us know.

Russian news and propaganda sites often reported on Gabbard’s campaign, and moments in Gabbard’s (failed) campaign were amplified by trolls and bots on Twitter with ties to Russia.

Try to keep up, old boy.

She's a mole.


Russia have always reported on Clinton and moments in Clintons failed campaign which were amplified by trolls and bots on Twitter with ties to Russia. On top of that Clinton knew information about what the Kremlin wanted.

Looks like you have two moles.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 13th, 2025 at 6:30pm

Leroy wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 6:26pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 6:23pm:

Leroy wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 6:18pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 6:16pm:


Does this mean that Hillary Clinton has contacts in the Kremlin, otherwise how would she know?.


The same way the rest of us know.

Russian news and propaganda sites often reported on Gabbard’s campaign, and moments in Gabbard’s (failed) campaign were amplified by trolls and bots on Twitter with ties to Russia.

Try to keep up, old boy.

She's a mole.


Russia have always reported on Clinton and moments in Clintons failed campaign which were amplified by trolls and bots on Twitter with ties to Russia. On top of that Clinton knew information about what the Kremlin wanted.

Looks like you have two moles.


Which one is about to be in the White House?

Would you like some thinking music?


Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Leroy on Jan 13th, 2025 at 6:33pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 6:30pm:

Leroy wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 6:26pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 6:23pm:

Leroy wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 6:18pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 6:16pm:


Does this mean that Hillary Clinton has contacts in the Kremlin, otherwise how would she know?.


The same way the rest of us know.

Russian news and propaganda sites often reported on Gabbard’s campaign, and moments in Gabbard’s (failed) campaign were amplified by trolls and bots on Twitter with ties to Russia.

Try to keep up, old boy.

She's a mole.


Russia have always reported on Clinton and moments in Clintons failed campaign which were amplified by trolls and bots on Twitter with ties to Russia. On top of that Clinton knew information about what the Kremlin wanted.

Looks like you have two moles.


Which one is about to be in the White House?

Would you like some thinking music?


Which one was pulling the Biden strings while Putin invaded Ukraine.
Need a asprin?



Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 13th, 2025 at 6:35pm

Tulsi loves a good spit-roast.


Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Leroy on Jan 13th, 2025 at 7:16pm
Did you know that Hillary has been into Putins inner sanctum.



Quote:
When Ms Clinton and Mr Putin met, she thought he was trying to establish dominance and she called it "manspreading".

She said he took her into his inner sanctum and showed her a map of the places he was intending to tag polar bears. He asked her to extend an invitation to her husband Bill to come along.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 13th, 2025 at 7:20pm

Leroy wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 7:16pm:
Did you know that Hillary has been into Putins inner sanctum.


I know Putin has been deep into Trump's and Gabbard's inner sanctum.

Balls deep.


Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Leroy on Jan 13th, 2025 at 7:28pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 7:20pm:

Leroy wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 7:16pm:
Did you know that Hillary has been into Putins inner sanctum.


I know Putin has been deep into Trump's and Gabbard's inner sanctum.

Balls deep.


I don't think Vlad has ever offered Trump or Tulsi a private cosy little trip out onto the ice to tag polar bears with a single two man tent.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 13th, 2025 at 7:37pm

Leroy wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 7:28pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 7:20pm:

Leroy wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 7:16pm:
Did you know that Hillary has been into Putins inner sanctum.


I know Putin has been deep into Trump's and Gabbard's inner sanctum.

Balls deep.


I don't think Vlad has ever offered Trump or Tulsi a private cosy little trip out onto the ice to tag polar bears with a single two man tent.


Indeed.

He doesn't offer - he just tells them exactly what they're going to do.


Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Leroy on Jan 13th, 2025 at 7:55pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 7:37pm:

Leroy wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 7:28pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 7:20pm:

Leroy wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 7:16pm:
Did you know that Hillary has been into Putins inner sanctum.


I know Putin has been deep into Trump's and Gabbard's inner sanctum.

Balls deep.


I don't think Vlad has ever offered Trump or Tulsi a private cosy little trip out onto the ice to tag polar bears with a single two man tent.


Indeed.

He doesn't offer - he just tells them exactly what they're going to do.

Wouldn't you do the same, By listening to Putin Trump is now the president of the free world, Tulsi has gone from a nobody to Putins personal informant and director of national intelligence. Putin owns everybody, he is the master and Trump again was correct, Putin is smart.

So how smart are the dems, Putin installs his own President and own director of national intelligence all under the watch of Biden.

Did the dems take a pay off from Putin or were they just stupid. He invaded Ukraine and took over the whitehouse while the dems were busy trying to work out what their pronouns are.

Did he offer the dems a whipping or did he just give them a whipping.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 13th, 2025 at 8:01pm

Leroy wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 7:55pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 7:37pm:

Leroy wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 7:28pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 7:20pm:

Leroy wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 7:16pm:
Did you know that Hillary has been into Putins inner sanctum.


I know Putin has been deep into Trump's and Gabbard's inner sanctum.

Balls deep.


I don't think Vlad has ever offered Trump or Tulsi a private cosy little trip out onto the ice to tag polar bears with a single two man tent.


Indeed.

He doesn't offer - he just tells them exactly what they're going to do.

Wouldn't you do the same, ...


No.


Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Leroy on Jan 13th, 2025 at 8:03pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 8:01pm:

Leroy wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 7:55pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 7:37pm:

Leroy wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 7:28pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 7:20pm:

Leroy wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 7:16pm:
Did you know that Hillary has been into Putins inner sanctum.


I know Putin has been deep into Trump's and Gabbard's inner sanctum.

Balls deep.


I don't think Vlad has ever offered Trump or Tulsi a private cosy little trip out onto the ice to tag polar bears with a single two man tent.


Indeed.

He doesn't offer - he just tells them exactly what they're going to do.

Wouldn't you do the same, ...


No.


So why did the left roll over and let Putin take over America. what kind of leadership allows a foreign leader take over their country?.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Karnal on Jan 13th, 2025 at 10:40pm

Leroy wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 6:09pm:

Karnal wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 5:45pm:

Leroy wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 5:29pm:

Karnal wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 5:27pm:

aquascoot wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 2:38pm:
she s a winner

maybe the only democrat who isnt currently despised by the public

she will get so sick of winning  :D :D :D


So will we. Every piece of intelligence Australia shares with the US now goes from Tulsi to Vlad, then straight to the "noble Xi".

Something tells me that's what you wanted all along, no? A Russian mole, right in the heart of  the US Intelligence apparatus.

DEEP STATE !!!


OH so now you hate the freedom of speech and promote censorship.


Never ever, Leroy. We've always wanted Australian intellectual property, ASIO files and federal cabinet minutes handed over to the CCP.

I mean, what are the CSIRO, ASIO and the federal government saying that's so important, anyway?

You'd certainly hope Chi-na gets the right targets for it's next lab-made virus, no?

Tulsi stands to make a nice little drink on the blackmail.

VENGEANCE !!!


Your all over the place like a drunk, are you now saying that Chine made and released covid. Its hard to keep up.

So what if Tulsi makes a little on the side, at least she cut out the middle man Hunter.

You don't like to see women flex a bit and act like men do you.


;D

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Frank on Jan 15th, 2025 at 11:20am
Former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard has won the complete endorsement of the National Sheriff’s Association, and the organization is urging the Senate to confirm her to serve as Director of National Intelligence for the incoming Donald Trump administration.

In a letter issued to Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) on Monday, the association’s president, Kieran Donahue, who is an Idaho sheriff, urged leaders to confirm Gabbard, the Daily Wire reported.

The letter reads in part:

Ms. Gabbard has demonstrated a commitment to addressing the critical disconnect between our intelligence agencies and local law enforcement in preparing for sophisticated and pervasive threats. The recent terror attack on New Orleans serves as a stark reminder of the need for seamless coordination. In the immediate aftermath of the attack, actionable leads provided by Sheriffs in Harris County, Texas, and Fulton County, Georgia, proved instrumental. These events, like the attacks of 9/11, underscore the urgent need for local law enforcement to have a seat at the table during strategic planning discussions. Ms. Gabbard has pledged to make this a priority.

Ms. Gabbard’s unparalleled experience at the local, state, and federal levels of government, combined with her leadership as a lieutenant colonel in the U.S. Army Reserve, makes her uniquely qualified for this critical role. Her proven ability to lead and her deep understanding of national security threats have earned the confidence and respect of Sheriffs across the country

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 15th, 2025 at 11:27am

Frank wrote on Jan 15th, 2025 at 11:20am:
Former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard has won the complete endorsement of ...


... Vladimir Putin.



Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Frank on Jan 15th, 2025 at 11:36am

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 15th, 2025 at 11:27am:

Frank wrote on Jan 15th, 2025 at 11:20am:
Former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard has won the complete endorsement of ...


... Vladimir Putin.


The sheriffs of the US are alll duped - but not the unflushable Slovenian tujd in Perth! He sees, he knows, he has a picker and he has memes and is unflushable! Oh, yes!

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Dnarever on Jan 15th, 2025 at 7:29pm
One of those cases for the right that when you win you lose.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 15th, 2025 at 7:34pm

Dnarever wrote on Jan 15th, 2025 at 7:29pm:
One of those cases for the right that when you win you lose.


They'll certainly regret bringing her into the fold.


Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 17th, 2025 at 8:49am

She has no idea   ;D

Perfect for the Trump administration.

"Donald Trump’s pick for director of national intelligence couldn’t clearly say what the director of national intelligence actually does, according to a new report in the Wall Street Journal.

"Meeting with Senate Republicans ahead of her confirmation hearings, Tulsi Gabbard, the former Democratic representative turned MAGA loyalist, failed to articulate what the job she’d been nominated for entails. She also didn’t know the difference between key surveillance powers, according to the report."

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Frank on Jan 17th, 2025 at 11:18am

Dnarever wrote on Jan 15th, 2025 at 7:29pm:
One of those cases for the right that when you win you lose.

That is so daft, it must be your own idea, waddling fowl.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 17th, 2025 at 11:36am

"... couldn’t clearly say what the director of national intelligence actually does ..."

"... failed to articulate what the job she’d been nominated for entails. She also didn’t know the difference between key surveillance powers..."


::)

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by wombatwoody on Jan 31st, 2025 at 3:59pm

wombatwoody wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 6:35am:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 18th, 2024 at 5:12am:

Karnal wrote on Nov 17th, 2024 at 10:24pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 17th, 2024 at 3:57pm:
keep posting gweggy

the entire younger generation have heard her talk to rogan about treating shot up soldiers during her tours . soldiers shot up because the left have become warmongers

keep it up

should be good for another million lost by the left  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


The only leftie warmongers in Washington are the ones left over from the Bush-Cheney administration.

With the new administration, you're about to see what warmongers really look like. Don't believe me?

You'll see. Your DL's already got a new name for Palestine. Guess what it is.



dick cheney, warmonger extraordinaire, endorsed   HARRIS you dickhead  ;D ;D



The Incoming Trump Administration Is Already Filling Up With War Sluts


Donald Trump has named Republican congressman Mike Waltz as his next national security advisor, a position that was held by ultrahawk John Bolton in the last Trump administration.

Like Bolton, Waltz is a warmongering freak. Journalist Michael Tracey has been filling up his Twitter page since the announcement with examples of Waltz’s insane hawkishness, including his support for letting Ukraine use US weapons to strike deep into Russian territory, criticizing Biden for not escalating aggressively enough in Ukraine, advocating bombing Iran, opposing the US military withdrawal from Afghanistan, and naming Iran, North Korea, China, Russia and Venezuela as “on the march” against the United States toward global conflict. The mainstream press are calling Waltz a “China hawk”, but from the look of things he’s a war-horny hawk toward all the official enemies of the United States.

Trump has also confirmed that Republican congresswoman Elise Stefanik will be taking on the role of US ambassador to the UN, a role previously held by warmonger Nikki Haley in the last Trump administration. Again, there doesn’t seem to be much difference between the old hawk and the new one.

Stefanik is best known for her congressional efforts to stomp out free speech on college campuses, making a lie of Trump’s lip service to the importance of First Amendment rights. She’s a hawkish swamp monster whose political career was primed in some of the most odious neoconservative think tanks in Washington, and opposes placing any limits on US military support for Israel. Earlier this year Stefanik actually flew to Israel to give a speech before the Israeli Knesset vowing to help stop the “antisemitism” of protesters against Israel’s genocidal atrocities at American universities.

And now we’re getting reports throughout the mass media that deranged war slut Marco Rubio has been tapped as Trump’s new secretary of state. It’s really hard to imagine anyone worse for the role of Washington’s top diplomat than a warmonger who has spent his entire political career pushing for more wars, sanctions and slaughter at every opportunity.

This should dash the hopes of Trump supporters everywhere that this time their guy really will end the wars and drain the swamp. Trump’s appointment of Iran hawk Brian Hook to help staff the State Department for the next administration and his rumored consideration of Mike Rogers for secretary of defense are likewise bad signs, as is Tucker Carlson’s claim that virulent China hawk Elbridge Colby is likely to play a role in the administration.

Trump’s anti-interventionist supporters loudly applauded the other day when he unexpectedly announced that Mike Pompeo and Nikki Haley would not be playing a role in the next administration. In response to the announcement, libertarian comedian and podcaster Dave Smith said on Twitter that stopping Pompeo was not enough and that “we need maximum pressure to keep all neocons and war hawks out of the Trump administration.” In response to Smith’s post, Donald Trump Jr tweeted, “Agreed!!! I’m on it.”

When I saw this, I tweeted the following:

Ignore their words and watch their actions. Been saying it for years, and I’m going to keep on saying it. Ignore their words, watch their actions. Talk, as they say, is cheap.”

Their actions are telling us a lot more than their words right now.

https://x.com/caitoz/status/1856172604652216502



As Part of 'Authoritarian Takeover,' Trump Signs Order to Deport Pro-Palestine Students


https://www.commondreams.org/news/trump-executive-order-protests

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Leroy on Jan 31st, 2025 at 4:05pm

wombatwoody wrote on Jan 31st, 2025 at 3:59pm:
As Part of 'Authoritarian Takeover,' Trump Signs Order to Deport Pro-Palestine Students


https://www.commondreams.org/news/trump-executive-order-protests


And so he should, America has thousands of its soldiers fighting terrorists all over the world and nothing would be more insulting to have people at home protesting and supporting the over two million Palestinians that support the terrorists trying to kill the American soldiers.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 31st, 2025 at 4:31pm

Russian state TV has continued to air Fox News clips that align with Vladimir Putin’s spin on the invasion of Ukraine, most recently showing a Tucker Carlson interview with former Democratic US Representative Tulsi Gabbard, whom the Russian host introduced as “our friend”.



Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by wombatwoody on Jan 31st, 2025 at 4:41pm

Leroy wrote on Jan 31st, 2025 at 4:05pm:

wombatwoody wrote on Jan 31st, 2025 at 3:59pm:
As Part of 'Authoritarian Takeover,' Trump Signs Order to Deport Pro-Palestine Students


https://www.commondreams.org/news/trump-executive-order-protests


And so he should, America has thousands of its soldiers fighting terrorists all over the world and nothing would be more insulting to have people at home protesting and supporting the over two million Palestinians that support the terrorists trying to kill the American soldiers.



You mean all those terrorists that the Americans themselves have trained, in their own state of Georgia?

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/oct/30/afghanistan.terrorism19

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Leroy on Jan 31st, 2025 at 8:35pm

wombatwoody wrote on Jan 31st, 2025 at 4:41pm:

Leroy wrote on Jan 31st, 2025 at 4:05pm:

wombatwoody wrote on Jan 31st, 2025 at 3:59pm:
As Part of 'Authoritarian Takeover,' Trump Signs Order to Deport Pro-Palestine Students


https://www.commondreams.org/news/trump-executive-order-protests


And so he should, America has thousands of its soldiers fighting terrorists all over the world and nothing would be more insulting to have people at home protesting and supporting the over two million Palestinians that support the terrorists trying to kill the American soldiers.



You mean all those terrorists that the Americans themselves have trained, in their own state of Georgia?

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/oct/30/afghanistan.terrorism19


Whats this, Iran have a training camp down in Georgia, I can feel a song coming on.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sh7BZf7D5Bw

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Karnal on Jan 31st, 2025 at 9:56pm

Frank wrote on Jan 15th, 2025 at 11:20am:
Former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard has won the complete endorsement of the National Sheriff’s Association, and the organization is urging the Senate to confirm her to serve as Director of National Intelligence for the incoming Donald Trump administration.

In a letter issued to Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) on Monday, the association’s president, Kieran Donahue, who is an Idaho sheriff, urged leaders to confirm Gabbard, the Daily Wire reported.

The letter reads in part:

Ms. Gabbard has demonstrated a commitment to addressing the critical disconnect between our intelligence agencies and local law enforcement in preparing for sophisticated and pervasive threats. The recent terror attack on New Orleans serves as a stark reminder of the need for seamless coordination. In the immediate aftermath of the attack, actionable leads provided by Sheriffs in Harris County, Texas, and Fulton County, Georgia, proved instrumental. These events, like the attacks of 9/11, underscore the urgent need for local law enforcement to have a seat at the table during strategic planning discussions. Ms. Gabbard has pledged to make this a priority.

Ms. Gabbard’s unparalleled experience at the local, state, and federal levels of government, combined with her leadership as a lieutenant colonel in the U.S. Army Reserve, makes her uniquely qualified for this critical role. Her proven ability to lead and her deep understanding of national security threats have earned the confidence and respect of Sheriffs across the country


So not satire, dear boy.

In other unbreaking news, Mother and Aussie Aussie Aussie have pulled out of Five Eyes fearing the worst.

Yes, Tulsi plans to upload the lot to Chi-na and Russia Russia Russia.

And that's her right in a free country, yes?

You like Danish, no?

Good old Mette. Wonderful wonderful Copenhagen, innit.

Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard
Post by Frank on Feb 1st, 2025 at 5:56am

Karnal wrote on Jan 31st, 2025 at 9:56pm:
So not satire, dear boy.

In other unbreaking news, Mother and Aussie Aussie Aussie have pulled out of Five Eyes fearing the worst.

Yes, Tulsi plans to upload the lot to Chi-na and Russia Russia Russia.

And that's her right in a free country, yes?

You like Danish, no?

Good old Mette. Wonderful wonderful Copenhagen, innit.



That''s enough retarded gibberish, son of Lahore.


Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved.