Executive Order Approving the Basic Principles of State Policy of the Russian Federation on Nuclear Deterrence

November 19, 2024 - 11:10

In order to improve the state policy of the Russian Federation in the sphere of nuclear deterrence, the President signed Executive Order Approving the Basic Principles of State Policy of the Russian Federation on Nuclear Deterrence.

Presidential Executive Order No. 355, dated June 2, 2020, Basic Principles of State Policy of the Russian Federation on Nuclear Deterrence, shall be declared to be no longer in force.

This Executive Order shall come into effect on the day of its signing.

The Basic Principles represent a strategic planning document in the area of ensuring national defence and reflect the official views on the essence of nuclear deterrence, identify military risks and threats to be neutralised by means of nuclear deterrence, outline the principles of nuclear deterrence, and specify the conditions under which the Russian Federation may proceed to use nuclear weapons.

The regulatory framework for these Basic Principles includes the Constitution of the Russian Federation, universally recognised principles and norms of international law, international treaties of the Russian Federation, federal constitutional laws, federal laws and other legal acts and documents that regulate defence and security issues.

The provisions of these Basic Principles are mandatory for implementation by all federal bodies of state authority and other government bodies and organisations involved in ensuring nuclear deterrence.

These Basic Principles may be further specified depending on the external and internal factors that influence defence implementation.

Overall guidance of state policy in the area of nuclear deterrence is carried out by the President of the Russian Federation.

http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/75598



As far as I understand, this is the last step before the highest level of escalation of the conflict. The next step will be nuclear missiles flying towards Russia's enemies.

RussiAnVetEraN wrote on Nov 20^th, 2024 at 1:05am:

The provisions of these Basic Principles are mandatory for implementation by all federal bodies of state authority and other government bodies and organisations involved in ensuring nuclear deterrence.

The railways and local village councils are to maintain their nuclear missiles ready to launch. Pre-school kids must be alert to use of keys and buttons for lift-off and orders by mobile phone.

chimera wrote on Nov 20^th, 2024 at 5:43am:

RussiAnVetEraN wrote on Nov 20th, 2024 at 1:05am: The provisions of these Basic Principles are mandatory for implementation by all federal bodies of state authority and other government bodies and organisations involved in ensuring nuclear deterrence. The railways and local village councils are to maintain their nuclear missiles ready to launch. Pre-school kids must be alert to use of keys and buttons for lift-off and orders by mobile phone.

Every citizen of Russia has a button to launch a nuclear missile at your house.

The average Russian drinks 18 liters of pure alcohol per year, which is 10 liters more than the World Health Organization considers dangerous. This is equivalent to about 180 bottles of vodka per year, or half a bottle per day.

chimera wrote on Nov 20^th, 2024 at 6:40am:

The average Russian drinks 18 liters of pure alcohol per year, which is 10 liters more than the World Health Organization considers dangerous. This is equivalent to about 180 bottles of vodka per year, or half a bottle per day.

We will be able to find this button even in a state of extreme alcoholic intoxication.

Russian drunks have pushed the buttons since 2014 so why stop now?

chimera wrote on Nov 20^th, 2024 at 6:50am:

Russian drunks have pushed the buttons since 2014 so why stop now?

Russian drunks are very annoyed by Western missiles hitting their wine cellars.

You toucha my vodka, I breaka you face. 

It really is quite the farce when you have Russia warning against "escalation" in their war against Ukraine when they are the ones who have invaded Ukraine, not once but twice (first back in 2014 in Crimea). They're the ones who have enlisted the help of tens of thousands of North Korean troops. They're the ones who are deliberately destroying civilian targets, resulting in the deaths of innocent women and children. Putin has made threats about escalation before and done nothing. This is a load of hot air and Biden and Starmer and Macron know it, which is why they've all allowed Ukraine to use their long range weapons to strike targets well inside Russia. The only thing wrong with this decision is that it wasn't made a year ago.

Russia has overwhelming advantages and still needs to keep threatening nukes. That suggests a deeper weakness and a risk of Russians being anti-nuke and then anti-Putin. He is playing his final card, again.

Quote:

They're the ones who have enlisted the help of tens of thousands of North Korean troops.

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img922/8632/ZFGg6r.png

The caption reads: "Do I believe that soldiers who look like Koreans soon will appear at the front? Yes, I believe so"

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img923/6220/DLrnLj.jpg

;D

'A drone hit Izhevsk, the capital of Russia's Udmurt Republic more than 1200km into Moscow's territory'.  It carried the friendly message 'have a nuke day'.

Nuke hit chimera causing atomic butthurt

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/800x600q70/922/rTkxhg.png

Stop it or I'll use my nukes on you. I will.
I will.

Why nukes when Russia has already hit energy targets in Ukraine recently, coming into winter?

Putin is a typical Russian blowarse c~nt.

The moment he uses a nuke in Ukraine, the US and Europe have enough conventional weapons to cripple Russian defences and destroy supply lines for food and resources.

He, his family and the entire Russian command are designated military targets for the use of nukes in Ukraine.

Maybe the total collapse of Russian infrastructure will be the only chance Russians will get to rid themselves of this turd.

"Putin is a typical Russian blowarse c~nt." (c) any poofta idiot

lee wrote on Nov 20^th, 2024 at 2:45pm:

Why nukes when Russia has already hit energy targets in Ukraine recently, coming into winter?

nukes are deterrent against WOKE NATO faggots.

RussiAnVetEraN wrote on Nov 20^th, 2024 at 6:45am:

We will be able to find this button even in a state of extreme alcoholic intoxication.

Not if you're already dead. Russians barely make it to 60.

The manipulation is that some people here are looking at Russia and Ukraine in a deliberately narrowing context of the events that are taking place.

But in this case, for a deeper understanding of the events taking place, we need to look at Russia, Ukraine and NATO.

MeisterEckhart wrote on Nov 20^th, 2024 at 4:13pm:

Not if you're already dead. Russians barely make it to 60.

You are faggot liar, asshole on fire  ;D

   
Quote:

The current life expectancy for Russia in 2024 is 73.12 years, a 0.19% increase from 2023.     The life expectancy for Russia in 2023 was 72.98 years, a 0.19% increase from 2022.     The life expectancy for Russia in 2022 was 72.84 years, a 0.19% increase from 2021.     The life expectancy for Russia in 2021 was 72.70 years, a 0.19% increase from 2020.

https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/rus/russia/life-expectancy

tallowood wrote on Nov 20^th, 2024 at 3:08pm:

nukes are deterrent against WOKE NATO faggots.

Putin must be a very drunk Russian. He threatened nukes if sovereignty was threatened. NATO supplied long range  missiles. Putin lowered the bar for nukes if missiles hit inside Russia. Ukraine uses missiles to hit inside Russia. Putin has a drink with Tallowood who is now very drunk.

chimera wrote on Nov 20^th, 2024 at 4:37pm:

tallowood wrote on Nov 20th, 2024 at 3:08pm: nukes are deterrent against WOKE NATO faggots. Putin must be a very drunk Russian. He threatened nukes if sovereignty was threatened. NATO supplied long range  missiles. Putin lowered the bar for nukes if missiles hit inside Russia. Ukraine uses missiles to hit inside Russia. Putin has a drink with Tallowood who is now very drunk.

You are having atomic butthurt again, the dills use the missiles against Russian territory already and it doesn't do them any  good, AFU is on back foot and keep loosing.

So how does that deterrent work? (Wait until the vodka wears off if you need to think more clearly)

chimera wrote on Nov 20^th, 2024 at 4:52pm:

So how does that deterrent work? (Wait until the vodka wears off if you need to think more clearly)

NATO faggots will get fried if they are stupid enough to attack Russia directly.
You really have to wait for your anus to cool down, heat is bad for your crappy brain.

tallowood wrote on Nov 20^th, 2024 at 3:08pm:

nukes are deterrent against WOKE NATO faggots.

Putin says it's deterrent against missiles inside Russia. How does it deter missiles which Ukraine sent inside Russia?

chimera wrote on Nov 20^th, 2024 at 5:03pm:

tallowood wrote on Nov 20th, 2024 at 3:08pm: nukes are deterrent against WOKE NATO faggots. Putin says it's deterrent against missiles inside Russia. How does it deter missiles which Ukraine sent inside Russia?

Poof, you are known as quotes falsifier. So where is link to this quote?

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/putin-issues-warning-us-with-new-nuclear-doctrine-2024-11-19/
Putin said 'Nukes are deterrent against WOKE NATO faggots. They are butthurt and Holy Mother Russia will *$^ F#0! A_ L**%_>?%'

chimera wrote on Nov 20^th, 2024 at 5:12pm:

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/putin-issues-warning-us-with-new-nuclear-doctrine-2024-11-19/ Putin said 'Nukes are deterrent against WOKE NATO faggots. They are butthurt and Holy Mother Russia will *$^ F#0! A_ L**%_>?%'

Poof, there is no the quote there. You just can't stop your falsifications because you  can't stop to be a poof.

The WOKE NATO Faggot MGM-140 Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) has a maximum firing range of 300 km, altitude 50km with warhead M74 bomblets or 214 kg WAU unitary warhead.

The Faggot uses Jack Daniels whisky and may be deterred by Vladimir 'Hot Air Balloon' Putin, but not so far. Some have named him 'Poof Putin'.

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/800x600q70/923/mrUQNN.png

MOSCOW, Nov 19 (Reuters) - 'Russian President Vladimir Putin on Tuesday lowered the threshold for a nuclear strike in response to a broader range of conventional attacks, and Moscow said Ukraine had struck deep inside Russia with U.S.-made ATACMS missiles'.

Putin broke down in tears saying he has the best deterrent in the world and why won't the faggots do as he says. He showed the burn marks on his buttocks and said Joe is a naughty boy.

Poofy chimera broke down in tears because of atomic butthurt caused by nuke in his anus  :o

No nukes.
Missiles inside Russia.
Tallowood is becoming confused and repetitive.

Poofy chimera lost his anal brain due to hot ATACM burning his anus, he should've cool it in freezer first before using it for his asshole pleasuring.
;D

It's just Putin helping out his fat little cock-sucking buddy, Trump.

Once the rapist moves back into The White House, Putin will call off the nukes and then the convicted felon can act as if he alone saved the world from nuclear destruction.

All theatre.

Quote:

All theatre

More sickening then HOLLYWOOD horror.

WARNING 21+
https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img922/8734/MwJd7m.gif

Putin thinks a rifle is a nuclear weapon?

Putin is a magnanimous man so he sent to chimera a medicine and hopes chimera's brain would recover from ass to head.

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/600x600q70/924/xYS0ZA.jpg

Putin is more insane that I first thought.

tallowood wrote on Nov 20^th, 2024 at 5:20pm:

chimera wrote on Nov 20th, 2024 at 5:12pm: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/putin-issues-warning-us-with-new-nuclear-doctrine-2024-11-19/ Poof, there is no the quote there..

'The Kremlin said Russia considered nuclear weapons a means of deterrence and that the updated text was intended to make clear to potential enemies the inevitability of retaliation should they attack Russia.
"Nuclear deterrence is aimed at ensuring that a potential adversary understands the inevitability of retaliation in the event of aggression against the Russian Federation and/or its allies," Peskov said.
--
quote on deterrence.
Question to tallowood again: how is it deterrence when missiles are fired into Russia?

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Nov 20^th, 2024 at 7:44pm:

Putin is more insane that I first thought.

No need to worry, the Russian 'sphere of influence' is fu~ked as a cultural, nevermind, as a military and political force.

History proves that when empires decline, they never return.

tallowood wrote on Nov 20^th, 2024 at 5:20pm:

'The Kremlin .. to make clear to potential enemies the inevitability of [nuclear] retaliation should they attack Russia'.

Putin needs to get really, really cross and have a photo opportunity of him dragging a nuke along using his teeth on a leather strap.

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img922/6012/dNTDCb.jpg

Just asking, where's the deterrent?
Are you outraged?

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Nov 20^th, 2024 at 7:44pm:

Putin is more insane that I first thought.

He's much like Trump.

Yes, both men are hated by WOKE mob.

No deterrent, then, hmmm?

Armchair_Politician wrote on Nov 20^th, 2024 at 10:37am:

Putin has made threats about escalation before and done nothing. This is a load of hot air and Biden and Starmer and Macron know it, which is why they've all allowed Ukraine to use their long range weapons to strike targets well inside Russia.

Especially for those who continue to think so.


Statement by the President of the Russian Federation

November 21, 2024 - 20:10 - The Kremlin, Moscow

President of Russia Vladimir Putin:

I would like to inform the military personnel of the Russian Federation Armed Forces, citizens of our country, our friends across the globe, and those who persist in the illusion that a strategic defeat can be inflicted upon Russia, about the events taking place today in the zone of the special military operation, specifically following the attacks by Western long-range weapons against our territory.

The escalation of the conflict in Ukraine, instigated by the West, continues with the United States and its NATO allies previously announcing that they authorise the use of their long-range high-precision weapons for strikes inside the Russian Federation. Experts are well aware, and the Russian side has repeatedly highlighted it, that the use of such weapons is not possible without the direct involvement of military experts from the manufacturing nations.

On November 19, six ATACMS tactical ballistic missiles produced by the United States, and on November 21, during a combined missile assault involving British Storm Shadow systems and HIMARS systems produced by the US, attacked military facilities inside the Russian Federation in the Bryansk and Kursk regions. From that point onward, as we have repeatedly emphasised in prior communications, the regional conflict in Ukraine provoked by the West has assumed elements of a global nature. Our air defence systems successfully counteracted these incursions, preventing the enemy from achieving their apparent objectives.

The fire at the ammunition depot in the Bryansk Region, caused by the debris of ATACMS missiles, was extinguished without casualties or significant damage. In the Kursk Region, the attack targeted one of the command posts of our group North. Regrettably, the attack and the subsequent air defence battle resulted in casualties, both fatalities and injuries, among the perimeter security units and servicing staff. However, the command and operational staff of the control centre suffered no casualties and continues to manage effectively the operations of our forces to eliminate and push enemy units out of the Kursk Region.

I wish to underscore once again that the use by the enemy of such weapons cannot affect the course of combat operations in the special military operation zone. Our forces are making successful advances along the entire line of contact, and all objectives we have set will be accomplished.

In response to the deployment of American and British long-range weapons, on November 21, the Russian Armed Forces delivered a combined strike on a facility within Ukraine’s defence industrial complex. In field conditions, we also carried out tests of one of Russia’s latest medium-range missile systems – in this case, carrying a non-nuclear hypersonic ballistic missile that our engineers named Oreshnik. The tests were successful, achieving the intended objective of the launch. In the city of Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine, one of the largest and most famous industrial complexes from the Soviet Union era, which continues to produce missiles and other armaments, was hit.

We are developing intermediate-range and shorter-range missiles in response to US plans to produce and deploy intermediate-range and shorter-range missiles in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region. We believe that the United States made a mistake by unilaterally destroying the INF Treaty in 2019 under far-fetched pretext. Today, the United States is not only producing such equipment, but, as we can see, it has worked out ways to deploy its advanced missile systems to different regions of the world, including Europe, during training exercises for its troops. Moreover, in the course of these exercises, they are conducting training for using them.

As a reminder, Russia has voluntarily and unilaterally committed not to deploy intermediate-range and shorter-range missiles until US weapons of this kind appear in any region of the world.

To reiterate, we are conducting combat tests of the Oreshnik missile system in response to NATO’s aggressive actions against Russia. Our decision on further deployment of intermediate-range and shorter-range missiles will depend on the actions of the United States and its satellites.

We will determine the targets during further tests of our advanced missile systems based on the threats to the security of the Russian Federation. We consider ourselves entitled to use our weapons against military facilities of those countries that allow to use their weapons against our facilities, and in case of an escalation of aggressive actions, we will respond decisively and in mirror-like manner. I recommend that the ruling elites of the countries that are hatching plans to use their military contingents against Russia seriously consider this.
............

........
It goes without saying that when choosing, if necessary and as a retaliatory measure, targets to be hit by systems such as Oreshnik on Ukrainian territory, we will in advance suggest that civilians and citizens of friendly countries residing in those areas leave danger zones. We will do so for humanitarian reasons, openly and publicly, without fear of counter-moves coming from the enemy, who will also be receiving this information.

Why without fear? Because there are no means of countering such weapons today. Missiles attack targets at a speed of Mach 10, which is 2.5 to 3 kilometres per second. Air defence systems currently available in the world and missile defence systems being created by the Americans in Europe cannot intercept such missiles. It is impossible.

I would like to emphasise once again that it was not Russia, but the United States that destroyed the international security system and, by continuing to fight, cling to its hegemony, they are pushing the whole world into a global conflict.

We have always preferred and are ready now to resolve all disputes by peaceful means. But we are also ready for any turn of events.

If anyone still doubts this, make no mistake: there will always be a response.

http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/75614




https://youtu.be/KrTNrGFFXvw?si=9dBvJ6EKMqZhT6is

Quote:

In response to the deployment of American and British long-range weapons, on November 21, the Russian Armed Forces delivered a combined strike on a facility within Ukraine’s defence industrial complex.

Quote:

and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them

The arrival of the Rubezh ICBM in Dnepropetrovsk.

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img924/5898/vyrKA8.gif

'Despite Putin’s claim, two U.S. defense officials told Fox News the missile was not hypersonic, which, according to NASA, is a speed greater than 3,000 mph and faster than Mach 5.'
Mach 5 is no deterrent.
Putin nukin is no deterrent.
Putin puking is horrible.

The only  rocket poofy chimera needs.

https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/632e0b9b3c0e35bf14a9d5f3/63c9691782cdf07e1177388a_Rectal%20Rocket%20Suppositories.png

So poofy chimera, get it in and crawl back under the rock.

No deterrent.
нет сдерживающего фактора
just abuse and bombs.

No detergent for chimera, he has to use it dry.

Putin is pissweak!

With the HUGE percentage of the ruzzian population living in Moscow and St Petersburg he ain’t going to start a nuclear war.

Ukrainians are still in Kursk and the ruzzian army is so short of men Ukrainian men from the temporarily occupied territories are being forced to fight for ruzzia. Desperation!

chimera wrote on Nov 22^nd, 2024 at 4:34pm:

'Despite Putin’s claim, two U.S. defense officials told Fox News the missile was not hypersonic, which, according to NASA, is a speed greater than 3,000 mph and faster than Mach 5.' Mach 5 is no deterrent.

Results of the Year with Vladimir Putin

December 19, 2024 - 16:30 - Moscow

.........
Konstantin Kokoveshnikov:

I cannot but ask you about the statements that we have heard over the past few weeks concerning the footage of the first combat tests of the latest Oreshnik missile, which has been shown all over the world. One gets the impression that it really has no drawbacks, but the West continues to refer to Oreshnik as a modification of old Soviet weapons, claiming that this missile can be shot down by air defence even at the launch stage.

How would you comment on this? Does it have any shortcomings?

If you do not mind, I have a clarifying question: what meaning did the creators of the Oreshnik put into the name – hazel tree? There are several versions.


Vladimir Putin:

First, regarding how old or new and modern this weapon is. It is a modern, a brand new weapon. All new achievements in any sphere are based on the designs and achievements made in the past, which people use to move forward. This is also true about the Oreshnik system.

Yes, it is based on previous designs, but these designs were made in the contemporary Russian period. Our scientists, designers and engineers used that basis to create something new, coordinating their activities with the Defence Ministry as the contractor. When I was ultimately informed about that system, I joined the discussions on whether to make it or not, in what quantities, when and how.

It is a new system. As I have said, it is an intermediate- and shorter-range system.

You have said that some Western experts believe that this missile can be easily shot down and destroyed, especially in the boost phase of the missile trajectory.

What would I tell those experts? There are several types of air defence systems, as you know being from the Zvezda TV channel, such as Patriot and the more modern THAAD systems. I do not know if Ukraine has them, but I do not think so. If the Americans want, they can send its THAAD systems to Ukraine. These are more modern systems similar to our S-400 systems. The Patriot systems are comparable to our S-300s, while THAAD is similar to our S-400 systems, if only slightly inferior.
......
If the Western experts you mentioned think otherwise, they should suggest to those in the West and the United States who are paying them for their analytical services to conduct a certain technological experiment, a high-tech 21st-century duel.

Let them choose a target in Kiev, deploy all their air defence and missile defence forces there, and we will hit that target using an Oreshnik missile. We shall see what happens.

We are ready to conduct this experiment. Is the other side ready? In any event, we do not rule this out. What I want to say is that all of their air defence and ABM systems are operating.

It would be interesting for us. I am telling you what engineers, scientists and military specialists are telling me. They are also telling some things at the level of the US political leadership.

Let us hold this experiment, this technological duel, and see what happens. This would be interesting and I believe it would be useful for both us and the US side.
.......

http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/75909

Nah, ruzzia tries to hit Kiev, Ukraine hits Moscow! THAT is a dual.

So sorry to hear like 3500 of your N Korean allies have died and more have deserted/defected. Just can’t get good help these days!

https://www.visualcapitalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/where-us-gets-enriched-uranium.jpg

Currently, the U.S. relies on foreign sources for 71.7% of its enriched uranium, despite possessing domestic resources.

Russia supplies 27.2% of enrichment services, making it the largest single foreign provider for U.S. civilian nuclear power reactors. After Russia, 12% of enriched uranium comes from France, 8% from the Netherlands, and 7% from the United Kingdom.

https://www.visualcapitalist.com/where-the-u-s-gets-its-enriched-uranium/