Australian Politics Forum | |
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
Member Run Boards >> Coronavirus >> Coronavirus 1966 - paper trail, gain of function http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1736158550 Message started by SerialBrain9 on Jan 6th, 2025 at 8:15pm |
Title: Coronavirus 1966 - paper trail, gain of function Post by SerialBrain9 on Jan 6th, 2025 at 8:15pm
and how/why vaccines have NEVER worked on any Coronavirus including colds and flu…
So if you are taking those jabs - you are kidding yourself and putting your own life in danger - for NO reason apart from filling Big Pharmaceutical Bank Accounts https://x.com/iluminatibot/status/1875288079201923210?s=61&t=pr9sQbfDnRXI42Hsv2j5ag |
Title: Re: Coronavirus 1966 - paper trail, gain of function Post by aquascoot on Jan 6th, 2025 at 8:25pm SerialBrain9 wrote on Jan 6th, 2025 at 8:15pm:
carls lining up for number 7. that alone should convince us how effective they are ;D ;D |
Title: Re: Coronavirus 1966 - paper trail, gain of function Post by SerialBrain9 on Jan 6th, 2025 at 8:38pm aquascoot wrote on Jan 6th, 2025 at 8:25pm:
If thats the case then he’s literally playing Russian Roulette… Its all documented - Vaccines have never worked on any Coronavirus because they mutate so fast… All you need to do is eat healthy and let your own body do its work.. The other thing thats all documented is that you have a 99.8% chance of just getting over C19 (if its even real) like a normal cold… we were ALL told this on Day One… And i was just reading today - with all of the claptrap about china and C19 filling the hospitals - its nothing more than normal colds and flu… But one mention of C19 and folks start running around like Henny Penny the chicken… 🐔 |
Title: Re: Coronavirus 1966 - paper trail, gain of function Post by Carl D on Jan 7th, 2025 at 9:46am SerialBrain9 wrote on Jan 6th, 2025 at 8:38pm:
The only ones playing Russian Roulette are the unvaccinated who are getting themselves repeatedly infected with a dangerous SARS virus that is still classed as a Level 3 Biohazard and can cause cumulative damage to multiple body organs, especailly the heart and brain. https://x.com/BigBadDenis/status/1872454349135499709 Quote:
https://x.com/BigBadDenis/status/1872454353254236344 Quote:
The numbers would be much, much higher of course due to the very low reporting these days. https://x.com/BigBadDenis/status/1872454357649899903 Quote:
And, in the US alone: https://x.com/BigBadDenis/status/1876168679723004359 Quote:
No report of death numbers of course but I've seen somewhere that the Covid death numbers in the US are currently running at about 400 a week. At least that's a lot less than the 1,000 to 1,500 deaths a week they were having for several months last year before they "mysteriously" stopped reporting deaths just before the US election. But, hey... "you do you" and all that... |
Title: Re: Coronavirus 1966 - paper trail, gain of function Post by Carl D on Jan 7th, 2025 at 9:54am aquascoot wrote on Jan 6th, 2025 at 8:25pm:
Yes. The vaccines are very effective in keeping people out of hospital (or the morgue). But, you should already know that by now. |
Title: Re: Coronavirus 1966 - paper trail, gain of function Post by Sophia on Jan 7th, 2025 at 6:28pm Carl D wrote on Jan 7th, 2025 at 9:46am:
The numbers would be much, much higher of course due to the very low reporting these days. https://x.com/BigBadDenis/status/1872454357649899903 Quote:
And, in the US alone: https://x.com/BigBadDenis/status/1876168679723004359 Quote:
No report of death numbers of course but I've seen somewhere that the Covid death numbers in the US are currently running at about 400 a week. At least that's a lot less than the 1,000 to 1,500 deaths a week they were having for several months last year before they "mysteriously" stopped reporting deaths just before the US election. But, hey... "you do you" and all that...[/quote] Carl… I’m clicking on links and for instance… the first link, where does it say whether people getting currently infected are jabbed or not? I see those around me in last 2 years get COVID more than once…even though they are triple/quadruple jabbed. I did get it bad in Jan 2022 as I have written in earlier topics… but I have not had it since… maybe I’ve developed a natural immunity? But it worries me… I think… jabbed or non jabbed… getting COVID and affecting the brain? In what way? |
Title: Re: Coronavirus 1966 - paper trail, gain of function Post by Carl D on Jan 7th, 2025 at 11:01pm
Good evening Sophia.
There is no information anywhere these days about the number of currently infected people who are vaccinated or not and how many 'jabs' they've had. You can still get Covid (repeatedly) regardless of how many 'jabs' you've had but, as has been pointed out here many times, the vaccines reduce the chances of ending up in the hospital (or the morgue) when you do get infected. Affecting the brain? Yes, it can and does. If you're on X then this lady is someone who knows all about what Covid is doing to the brain. https://x.com/danibeckman She sees it every day in her work. As for Covid deaths - I'm sure that if everyone knew that between 14th October to 10th November 2024 there were 3,071 Covid deaths in 27 out of 234 countries that still report Covid deaths there would be cause for concern. Just imagine how many Covid deaths would have been reported during that month if the entire 234 countries of the world were still reporting. Pretty scary stuff for a pandemic that is supposed to be over and a dangerous SARS virus that the majority of people now believe is nothing more than "just a cold". |
Title: Re: Coronavirus 1966 - paper trail, gain of function Post by Carl D on Jan 8th, 2025 at 8:41am
I also find it interesting that when I took my elderly aunt to the local chemist for her 7th Covid vaccination yesterday one of the ladies working at the newsagent there (it's a combined chemist/newsagent/post office) was wearing a high quality mask and she was coughing quite often so I assumed she must have had Covid or the flu at the very least.
I don't seem to recall something like that ever happening in the middle of summer before the Covid pandemic started. So much for this "mild respiratory virus" or "it's just a cold now". I also don't seem to recall government (State and Federal) employees asking if anyone in the house has Covid or any cold or flu symptoms when they phone up before they visit like the social workers and others are doing (in relation to my aunt's falls and aged care package application). Especially when governments have taken a 'vow of silence' regarding all things Covid these days. Seems that they really do know Covid isn't "just a cold" but they don't want the majority of the population to know... for the economy, of course. And they're scared of the inevitable lawsuits that would follow if they admitted it and everyone knew. |
Title: Re: Coronavirus 1966 - paper trail, gain of function Post by aquascoot on Jan 8th, 2025 at 12:36pm
hay carl
how many covid vaccines will you need to make you immortal ? |
Title: Re: Coronavirus 1966 - paper trail, gain of function Post by Carl D on Jan 8th, 2025 at 2:39pm aquascoot wrote on Jan 8th, 2025 at 12:36pm:
"Hay" aquascoot. ::) Oh, I dunno? 217 might just about do it. Worked out quite well for him... no side effects and he's also never had Covid. What do our resident antivaxxers have to say about that? But, the more important question here is: How many more lame posts does aquascoot have to make before he owes me another white flag? Stay tuned... :) |
Title: Re: Coronavirus 1966 - paper trail, gain of function Post by aquascoot on Jan 8th, 2025 at 3:33pm
hi carl
when you go to your GP, just get him to check you have a high level of vaccine in your blood. this is your definition of "good health" :-[ :-[ :-[ |
Title: Re: Coronavirus 1966 - paper trail, gain of function Post by Jasin on Jan 8th, 2025 at 6:37pm
None of them are actual vaccines, more just immune boosters, hence why people had to get another shot after shot until their immune systems have become totally dependent on shots.
|
Title: Re: Coronavirus 1966 - paper trail, gain of function Post by SerialBrain9 on Jan 8th, 2025 at 7:11pm Jasin wrote on Jan 8th, 2025 at 6:37pm:
Exactly right - they are NOT vaccines… 💉 However… They DESTROY your immune system and hence the turbo cancers, blood clots, myocarditis, heart attacks, strokes etc etc etc |
Title: Re: Coronavirus 1966 - paper trail, gain of function Post by Jasin on Jan 8th, 2025 at 7:56pm
Also. After taking a dependency of say x6 fake vaccine booster shots and then suddenly stop. The withdrawal side effect can be devastating as the body's immune system has been pushed up so high, then it collapses so low and stresses the organs like the heart.
|
Title: Re: Coronavirus 1966 - paper trail, gain of function Post by aquascoot on Jan 8th, 2025 at 8:02pm SerialBrain9 wrote on Jan 8th, 2025 at 7:11pm:
yeah a few vaccines are good but crikey they are pushing a lot nowadays a highly interfered with immune system is a wierd way to promote health check out all the vaccines your immune system is now expected to deal with even more if you are aboriginal Childhood vaccines Age Disease Vaccine Information Birth Hepatitis B H-B-Vax II (IM) or Engerix B (IM) Within 7 days of birth (ideally within 24 hours). 6 weeks Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, Haemophilus influenzae type b, hepatitis B, polio Infanrix Hexa (IM) or Vaxelis (IM) Pneumococcal Prevenar 13 (IM) Rotavirus Rotarix (Oral) Dose 1 limited to 6-14 weeks of age. Meningococcal B (Aboriginal1 children only) Bexsero (IM) Prophylactic paracetamol recommended. Recommended for other childhren - see the Australia Immunisation Handbook 4 months Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, Haemophilus influenzae type b, hepatitis B, polio Infanrix Hexa (IM) or Vaxelis (IM) Pneumococcal Prevenar 13 (IM) Rotavirus Rotarix (Oral) Dose 2 limited to 10-24 weeks Meningococcal B (Aboriginal children only) Bexsero (IM) Prophylactic paracetamol recommended. Recommended for other childhren - see the Australia Immunisation Handbook 6 months Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, Haemophilus influenzae type b, hepatitis B, polio Infanrix Hexa (IM) or Vaxelis (IM) Children ≥6 months with at risk conditions for invasive pneumococcal disease are recommended to receive an additional dose of Prevenar 13 – see the Australian Immunisation Handbook Aboriginal children ≥6 months with certain at risk conditions may require an additional dose of Bexsero – see the Australian Immunisation Handbook 12 months Meningococcal ACWY Nimenrix (IM) Pneumococcal Prevenar 13 (IM) Measles, mumps, rubella MMR II or Priorix (IM or SC) Meningococcal B (Aboriginal children only) Bexsero (IM) Prophylactic paracetamol recommended. Recommended for other childhren - see the Australia Immunisation Handbook 18 months Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis Infanrix or Tripacel (IM) Measles, mumps, rubella, varicella Priorix Tetra (IM or SC) Haemophilus influenzae type b ACT-HIB (IM or SC) 4 years Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio Infanrix-IPV (IM) or Quadracel (IM) Children with at risk conditions for invasive pneumococcal disease are recommended to receive an additional dose of Pneumovax 23 – see the Australian Immunisation Handbook At risk groups, adolescents and adults Age/Condition Disease Vaccine Information All people with asplenia, hyposplenia, complement deficiency and treatment with eculizumab Meningococcal ACWY Nimenrix (IM) See the Australian Immunisation Handbook for required doses and timing. Additional groups are recommended to receive these vaccines but these are not funded. Meningococcal B Bexsero (IM) >5 years with asplenia or hyposplenia Haemophilus influenzae type b ACT-HIB (IM or SC) If incompletely vaccinated or not vaccinated in childhood. ≥ 18 years Zoster Shingrix (IM) Eligible people ≥ 18 years considered at increased risk of herpes zoster due to an underlying condition and/or immunomodulatory/immunosuppressive treatments - see the Australian Immunisation Handbook Year 7 Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis Boostrix (IM) or Adacel (IM) Human papillomavirus Gardasil 9 (IM) Year 10 Meningococcal ACWY MenQuadfi (IM) Pregnant Influenza Influenza Any trimester. Pertussis Boostrix or Adacel (IM) Each pregnancy between 20-32 weeks. Aboriginal people ≥50 years Pneumococcal Prevenar 13 (IM) then Pneumovax23 (IM) Prevenar 13: ≥50 years. Pneumovax 23: 2-12 months later. Pneumovax 23: at least 5 years later (see the Australian Immunisation Handbook) Zoster Shingrix (IM) Shingrix: ≥ 50 years. ≥65 years Zoster Shingrix (IM) Shingrix funded for people ≥65 years. ≥70 years Pneumococcal Prevenar 13 (IM) Pneumococcal funded for people ≥70. People with at risk conditions for invasive pneumococcal disease See the Australian Immunisation Handbook for conditions recommended to receive Prevenar 13 and Pneumovax 23. Influenza Age/At risk condition Recommendation Information All children 6 months <5 years Annual influenza vaccination Discuss influenza vaccination with other present family members. Children aged less than 9 years of age who are receiving the influenza vaccine for the first time should receive 2 doses of the vaccine, 4 weeks apart. For vaccine brands and eligibility see Seasonal influenza vaccination. Aboriginal people ≥6 months People with at risk conditions ≥6 months ≥65 years Pregnant women |
Title: Re: Coronavirus 1966 - paper trail, gain of function Post by aquascoot on Jan 8th, 2025 at 8:03pm
https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/immunisation/app/Pages/schedule.aspx
side note no mention of covid vax :-/ :-/ :-/ |
Title: Re: Coronavirus 1966 - paper trail, gain of function Post by Carl D on Jan 8th, 2025 at 8:24pm aquascoot wrote on Jan 8th, 2025 at 8:03pm:
Why is that, I wonder? Perhaps this might help? From none other than the esteemed Dr. David Berger. And Queensland did exactly the same thing at about the same time. TL;DR (too long; didn't read): Governments are so determined to make everyone believe Covid has 'gone away' and are also too afraid to say the C word anymore that they won't even mention it in vaccination campaigns despite the fact that Covid is still about 10 times more deadly than the flu. You're welcome. :) |
Title: Re: Coronavirus 1966 - paper trail, gain of function Post by aquascoot on Jan 8th, 2025 at 8:41pm Carl D wrote on Jan 8th, 2025 at 8:24pm:
hi carl so covid is 10 x as deadly but the government arent pushing the vaccine 3 possibilities 1 the government want you to die 2 the government recognise the vaccine doesnt work 3 the government recognise the vaccine is dangerous and dont want to be sued ;) |
Title: Re: Coronavirus 1966 - paper trail, gain of function Post by Jovial Monk on Jan 10th, 2025 at 7:15am
God ’scoot is a moron!
Maybe, just maybe, the governments state and federal want no mention of covid because otherwise the people might want more of an effort to eradicate it? |
Title: Re: Coronavirus 1966 - paper trail, gain of function Post by Carl D on Jan 10th, 2025 at 8:23am
Out of aquascoot's "3 possibilities" only #1 is anywhere near being correct.
But, it's not that "the government want you to die". It's more like "the government doesn't care if you die". Especially the elderly and other "non productive economic units" (in their opinion). And, if governments admitted Covid was airborne and still dangerous then people would demand something be done about it - clean air in workplaces and other buildings which would cost a lot of money. Governments and businesses don't want to do that. Oh, except for themselves, of course (in Parliament House and World Economic Conferences, etc.). Persisting with "droplet dogma" (Covid doesn't travel further than 1.5 meters when exhaled) for as long as they can saves governments and business a lot of money by shifting "public health" to "personal responsibility" and we've seen how well that's worked out so far... endless waves of Covid and more dead and constantly sick people. This has been posted before but here's the video of former Tasmania Greens leader Cassy O'Connor questioning Premier Jeremy Rockliff about Covid. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2rCtaBBdwE You can see how uncomfortable Rockliff is. He even mentions "personal responsibility" (and Cassy replies with "it used to be called public health"). Another video where Cassy asks Disability Services Minister Jo Palmer about what protections the Tasmanian Government puts in place to protect vulnerable Tasmanians with disabilities. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75k_t3oeoFQ Jo doesn't look very comfortable either... funny about that. This comment says it all: Quote:
I'm betting nearly every single politician in Australia would have been uncomfortable if they'd been questioned about Australia's Covid response... especially after they decided to 'let it rip' and then take a 'vow of silence' regarding all things Covid. Disgraceful stuff. |
Title: Re: Coronavirus 1966 - paper trail, gain of function Post by aquascoot on Jan 10th, 2025 at 2:33pm Carl D wrote on Jan 10th, 2025 at 8:23am:
if youre a leaner , you probably find it disgraceful i find 'personal responsibility" invigorating ;) |
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved. |