Supreme court ruling

If a person accepts a pardon is considered an admission of guilt.

They also lose the right to the 5th amendment.

A person can reject the pardon to maintain their innocence and 5th amendment rights.

Pardons for Fauci etc were pre-emptive not for non-existent crimes TRumpy would use to take his revenge.

Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2025 at 11:08pm:

Pardons for Fauci etc were pre-emptive not for non-existent crimes TRumpy would use to take his revenge.

If they have not committed a crime then what is the pardon for?.

When asked if he would give himself a pardon Biden said, why I havent done anything wrong. Trump was also asked if he would give himself a pardon and he answered , Why I haven't committed a crime.

This is going to be fun to watch seeing as how this has bought up a few things out of left field. especially Fauci, if he accepts the pardon he can be subpoenaed and not have the 5th amendment right and faces criminal charges if he does not answer every question truthfully. This is if Trump is even interested in whats happening.

Lots of stuff coming up from the 2020 election and what dems said about pre emptive pardons when Trump left in 2020.
One in particular who is being offered a pardon by Biden said in 2020 that accepting a pardon is accepting guilt. Be interesting to see if he accepts his.

Leroy wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2025 at 11:26pm:

If they have not committed a crime then what is the pardon for?. When asked if he would give himself a pardon Biden said, why I havent done anything wrong. Trump was also asked if he would give himself a pardon and he answered , Why I haven't committed a crime. This is going to be fun to watch seeing as how this has bought up a few things out of left field. especially Fauci, if he accepts the pardon he can be subpoenaed and not have the 5th amendment right and faces criminal charges if he does not answer every question truthfully. This is if Trump is even interested in whats happening. Lots of stuff coming up from the 2020 election and what dems said about pre emptive pardons when Trump left in 2020. One in particular who is being offered a pardon by Biden said in 2020 that accepting a pardon is accepting guilt. Be interesting to see if he accepts his.

Interesting.

In a perfect world.....

......expecting that miscreants [even pardoned ones], would tell the truth, under judicial questioning.

;D


'Tell him he's dreaming!'

Yadda wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2025 at 11:43pm:

Leroy wrote on Jan 22nd, 2025 at 11:26pm: If they have not committed a crime then what is the pardon for?. When asked if he would give himself a pardon Biden said, why I havent done anything wrong. Trump was also asked if he would give himself a pardon and he answered , Why I haven't committed a crime. This is going to be fun to watch seeing as how this has bought up a few things out of left field. especially Fauci, if he accepts the pardon he can be subpoenaed and not have the 5th amendment right and faces criminal charges if he does not answer every question truthfully. This is if Trump is even interested in whats happening. Lots of stuff coming up from the 2020 election and what dems said about pre emptive pardons when Trump left in 2020. One in particular who is being offered a pardon by Biden said in 2020 that accepting a pardon is accepting guilt. Be interesting to see if he accepts his. Interesting. In a perfect world..... ......expecting that miscreants [even pardoned ones], would tell the truth, under judicial questioning. ;D 'Tell him he's dreaming!'

I doubt that Trump is even interested in what Fauci does, but it does give him an ace up his sleeve should it eventuate. Questioning the pardoned ones would put them in a quandry, lie to protect others and risk committing a crime, got a pardon dont care tell all the dems are screwed for decades.

Thats assuming there is anything worth exposing, but it begs the question, why pre emptive pardons when its to protect from a system they have been telling us is blind to politics. We should accept the rule of law, no one is above the law. It seems now its except us, we are above the law.

If Fauci is innocent he should welcome a trial where he can clear his name.

Bobby. wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2025 at 5:40am:

If Fauci is innocent he should welcome a trial where he can clear his name.

It's hard to imagine he'd get a fair trial with the amount of misinformation out there.

Especially when you consider that 54% of adults in the US have a literacy below 6th grade level.  People who don't have reading skills generally don't have critical thinking skills and they're easily manipulated.

Not only are they a danger to the US Republic, but it's terrifying to think they'd be a part of a jury too.

But they're Trump's favourite kind of person.

Take Bobbi, if he were in a jury he'd have decided Fauci's guilt before the trail even started and would reject any evidence provided that didn't align with that conclusion.

So does that mean the 143 people Trump pardoned in his first term, and the 1500 Jan 6th terrorists were also guilty?

Leroy wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2025 at 11:55pm:

I doubt that Trump is even interested in what Fauci does, but it does give him an ace up his sleeve should it eventuate. Questioning the pardoned ones would put them in a quandry, lie to protect others and risk committing a crime, got a pardon dont care tell all the dems are screwed for decades. Thats assuming there is anything worth exposing, but it begs the question, why pre emptive pardons when its to protect from a system they have been telling us is blind to politics. We should accept the rule of law, no one is above the law. It seems now its except us, we are above the law.

I look at    this Joe Biden tactic,    more, as method of MISDIRECTION
[......of public attention].

Away from, 'The' Biden family.


e.g.
MISDIRECTION......
Like you will see in a fiction crime drama,
where a murderer will kill multiple, say 6 people.
.....simply in order to hide his/her own direct motive, in killing a particular individual.

i.e.
And in doing so,   ...he/she conceals the identity of his/her real intended victim.



JUST LOOK AT......the voluminous number of preemptive presidential pardons.  !!!!!

i.e.
And the [many accusations of] Biden family criminality.......

"Nothing to see here.    Move on, move on."

Leroy wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2025 at 11:55pm:

Thats assuming there is anything worth exposing, but it begs the question, why pre emptive pardons when its to protect from a system they have been telling us is blind to politics. We should accept the rule of law, no one is above the law. It seems now its except us, we are above the law.

The system is blind to politics, but not the other way around.

In Trump's post truth White House, if science doesn't align with his version of events, out comes the sharpie.

TRUMPY WANTS VENGEANCE!

That is why Biden gave Fauci a pre-emptive pardon, protect against persecution dressed up as legal process.

In the sewer here—a collection of the simplest people—Booby bleats:


Quote:

If Fauci is innocent he should welcome a trial where he can clear his name.

A trial with Trumpy appointed judges would not be a fair trial, that wouldn’t be the purpose of any judicial moves against Fauci.

A child could see this, Booby and other simple people can’t.

In Fringe there is a 116 page thread where Booby tries to prove Fauci is guilty. No real evidence to that effect is included in that thread.

Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2025 at 7:08am:

In the sewer here—a collection of the simplest people—Booby bleats: Quote: If Fauci is innocent he should welcome a trial where he can clear his name. A trial with Trumpy appointed judges would not be a fair trial, that wouldn’t be the purpose of any judicial moves against Fauci. A child could see this, Booby and other simple people can’t. In Fringe there is a 116 page thread where Booby tries to prove Fauci is guilty. No real evidence to that effect is included in that thread.

It's the Fringe, that's expected.  What is scary is that he believes it.

Yeah.

Accepting a pardon is NOT an admission of guilt. This is also the case in the US when you are given a citation by a Police Officer for a traffic infringement - you are asked to sign a form stating you have received it and understand it, but that it is not an admission of any guilt and you can challenge the citation in court if you wish.

Yadda wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2025 at 6:27am:

I look at    this Joe Biden tactic,    more, as method of MISDIRECTION [......of public attention]. Away from, 'The' Biden family.

@01.50   [re all of these 'unprecedented' presidential pardons]
Trump during the election campaign, told America,
THAT HE WOULD GIVE THESE PARDONS [J6].
While [in contrast] Joe Biden, told America,
THAT HE >> WOULD NOT << GIVE PARDONS TO HIS SON [FAMILY].

@02.30   "Biden 'snouts in the trough', for so long....."



Hosts rip Biden for
pardoning family MINUTES before leaving office

08 min
January 21st, 2025

https://old.bitchute.com/video/XluDp1bH_mA/


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XluDp1bH_mA



Quote:

Fox News justice correspondent David Spunt provides details on former President Biden and President Trump's controversial pardons on Inauguration Day. 'Outnumbered' co-hosts react.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2025 at 7:42am:

Accepting a pardon is NOT an admission of guilt. This is also the case in the US when you are given a citation by a Police Officer for a traffic infringement - you are asked to sign a form stating you have received it and understand it, but that it is not an admission of any guilt and you can challenge the citation in court if you wish.

The supreme court has already ruled on it, you don't have the option of overruling the supreme court.

Democrats also said that if anyone accepts a pardon they accept guilt.

Good to see you accept the Jan 6th insurectionists are guilty as charged....So much for these dickheads being innocent!!!

[smiley=thumbsup.gif] [smiley=thumbsup.gif] [smiley=thumbsup.gif]

philperth2010 wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2025 at 8:26am:

Good to see you accept the Jan 6th insurectionists are guilty as charged....So much for these dickheads being innocent!!! [smiley=thumbsup.gif] [smiley=thumbsup.gif] [smiley=thumbsup.gif]

Its not up to me to accept anything, if they accept a pardon they admit guilt. This is a supreme court ruling, I had nothing to do with it.

Leroy wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2025 at 10:24am:

philperth2010 wrote on Jan 23rd, 2025 at 8:26am: Good to see you accept the Jan 6th insurectionists are guilty as charged....So much for these dickheads being innocent!!! [smiley=thumbsup.gif] [smiley=thumbsup.gif] [smiley=thumbsup.gif] Its not up to me to accept anything, if they accept a pardon they admit guilt. This is a supreme court ruling, I had nothing to do with it.

So they ARE guilty then.

Do pardons work if, say, one of those people get extradited to another country to face charges?


Quote:

Vladimir Putin is reportedly seeking to have Anthony Fauci EXTRADITED to Russia to face COVID-era ‘Crimes Against Humanity’ Charges as part of a Deal to end the War in Ukraine.

This is just hearsay at the moment - no solid evidence as yet …

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2025 at 10:41am:

Leroy wrote on Jan 23rd, 2025 at 10:24am: philperth2010 wrote on Jan 23rd, 2025 at 8:26am: Good to see you accept the Jan 6th insurectionists are guilty as charged....So much for these dickheads being innocent!!! [smiley=thumbsup.gif] [smiley=thumbsup.gif] [smiley=thumbsup.gif] Its not up to me to accept anything, if they accept a pardon they admit guilt. This is a supreme court ruling, I had nothing to do with it. So they ARE guilty then.

I don't know what you want here, they went to court found guilty and sent to jail. Are you trying to argue that they are not guilty.

Leroy wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2025 at 11:00am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23rd, 2025 at 10:41am: Leroy wrote on Jan 23rd, 2025 at 10:24am: philperth2010 wrote on Jan 23rd, 2025 at 8:26am: Good to see you accept the Jan 6th insurectionists are guilty as charged....So much for these dickheads being innocent!!! [smiley=thumbsup.gif] [smiley=thumbsup.gif] [smiley=thumbsup.gif] Its not up to me to accept anything, if they accept a pardon they admit guilt. This is a supreme court ruling, I had nothing to do with it. So they ARE guilty then. I don't know what you want here, they went to court found guilty and sent to jail. Are you trying to argue that they are not guilty.

I'm saying they don't deserve to be pardoned or have their sentences commuted. They launched an attack on the core of American democracy and should still be in prison. Trump calls them hostages and patriots. They aren't. The truth is they are criminals and traitors who attempted to overthrow the democratically elected government because they weren't happy with the result of the election.

SadKangaroo wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2025 at 6:27am:

Bobby. wrote on Jan 23rd, 2025 at 5:40am: If Fauci is innocent he should welcome a trial where he can clear his name. It's hard to imagine he'd get a fair trial with the amount of misinformation out there. Especially when you consider that 54% of adults in the US have a literacy below 6th grade level.  People who don't have reading skills generally don't have critical thinking skills and they're easily manipulated. Not only are they a danger to the US Republic, but it's terrifying to think they'd be a part of a jury too. But they're Trump's favourite kind of person. Take Bobbi, if he were in a jury he'd have decided Fauci's guilt before the trail even started and would reject any evidence provided that didn't align with that conclusion. So does that mean the 143 people Trump pardoned in his first term, and the 1500 Jan 6th terrorists were also guilty?

Then you're saying that no verdict in a court of law is safe?
I'm sure the selection of a jury can account for jurors who are not able to
understand technical subjects or if they might be biased.

Trump pardoned many people who were guilty of something -
however many of them - maybe 99% - just turned up at the capitol and were ushered in by
plain clothed FBI agents as part of a false flag operation.
All they did was walk along and take some pictures with their mobile phones.
That will all come out too before long.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2025 at 11:04am:

I'm saying they don't deserve to be pardoned or have their sentences commuted. They launched an attack on the core of American democracy and should still be in prison. Trump calls them hostages and patriots. They aren't. The truth is they are criminals and traitors who attempted to overthrow the democratically elected government because they weren't happy with the result of the election.

Some do some don't, Trump thinks the do and he has the say. Thats what the people voted for.

Do they have to decide whether to accept the pardon when it is given?

freediver wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2025 at 11:15am:

Do they have to decide whether to accept the pardon when it is given?

Yes to be valid they have to formally accept the pardon, which the supreme court ruled is an admission of guilt.

All the Jan 6th guys were found guilty anyway. Most pled guilty so have already conceded the point. Besides they were on TV at the time. So they have no credible argument otherwise.

freediver wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2025 at 11:15am:

Do they have to decide whether to accept the pardon when it is given?

I don't think so. They can call on it if charged.

The biden pardons are only meant as protection against the US's criminal President taking unfounded action with his weaponized DOJ.

Dnarever wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2025 at 3:09pm:

freediver wrote on Jan 23rd, 2025 at 11:15am: Do they have to decide whether to accept the pardon when it is given? I don't think so. They can call on it if charged.

Listening to a Fouci interview he had discussions months beforehand with Biden regarding a pardon and when it came about his lawyers were contacted by the whitehouse to ask if he wants to accept a pardon.

Normally the pardons are granted after being charged so there has never been a reason to delay them.

Dnarever wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2025 at 3:12pm:

The biden pardons are only meant as protection against the US's criminal President taking unfounded action with his weaponized DOJ.

Have you any evidence or examples of weaponization  by the DOJ, or have you made that bit up?.

Bobby. wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2025 at 11:09am:

SadKangaroo wrote on Jan 23rd, 2025 at 6:27am: Bobby. wrote on Jan 23rd, 2025 at 5:40am: If Fauci is innocent he should welcome a trial where he can clear his name. It's hard to imagine he'd get a fair trial with the amount of misinformation out there. Especially when you consider that 54% of adults in the US have a literacy below 6th grade level.  People who don't have reading skills generally don't have critical thinking skills and they're easily manipulated. Not only are they a danger to the US Republic, but it's terrifying to think they'd be a part of a jury too. But they're Trump's favourite kind of person. Take Bobbi, if he were in a jury he'd have decided Fauci's guilt before the trail even started and would reject any evidence provided that didn't align with that conclusion. So does that mean the 143 people Trump pardoned in his first term, and the 1500 Jan 6th terrorists were also guilty? Then you're saying that no verdict in a court of law is safe?

Generally, it has been.  But the courts, on all levels, have not in recent times had to face the sort of influence, pressure and control that Trump and his side of politics are trying to exert.

Look at Project 2025. It's calling for Restructuring the Department of Justice, Appointing Ideologically Aligned Judges on all levels, Expanding Presidential Authority and Embedding ideologies in Civil Service.

And that ignores what Trump and the Republicans have already been doing.

It should be something that worried you too.  At the moment, with your support of Trump, you're helping to normalise his behaviour, including the abandonment of the Law and seeing revenge.

It's fine when it's your guy, but you'd be crying if it was the next Democrat President.

But that's the way it always goes.  Only one side of politics cares about the ideals the US was founded upon, the other just wants to exploit that for personal gain.

SadKangaroo wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2025 at 3:36pm:

Generally, it has been.  But the courts, on all levels, have not in recent times had to face the sort of influence, pressure and control that Trump and his side of politics are trying to exert. Look at Project 2025. It's calling for Restructuring the Department of Justice, Appointing Ideologically Aligned Judges on all levels, Expanding Presidential Authority and Embedding ideologies in Civil Service. And that ignores what Trump and the Republicans have already been doing. It should be something that worried you too.  At the moment, with your support of Trump, you're helping to normalise his behaviour, including the abandonment of the Law and seeing revenge. It's fine when it's your guy, but you'd be crying if it was the next Democrat President. But that's the way it always goes.  Only one side of politics cares about the ideals the US was founded upon, the other just wants to exploit that for personal gain.

Dear Mr Sad,
it might help if you quoted my entire text:

here in full:

Then you're saying that no verdict in a court of law is safe?
I'm sure the selection of a jury can account for jurors who are not able to
understand technical subjects or if they might be biased.

Trump pardoned many people who were guilty of something -
however many of them - maybe 99% - just turned up at the capitol and were ushered in by
plain clothed FBI agents as part of a false flag operation.
All they did was walk along and take some pictures with their mobile phones.
That will all come out too before long.

Bobby. wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2025 at 5:40am:

If Fauci is innocent he should welcome a trial where he can clear his name.

Something like 20% of people in prison are innocent. Being innocent is no protection against prison.

Its like people think that now that Trump is president all judges will be republican and only maga cult members will be selected for jury duty.

Something else I'm not sure about is white supremacists, what do they actually want, I know power is one thing but what are they going to do with that power, bring back slavery, remove all non whites or send them all to Hawaii. What is the thinking here?.

Dnarever wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2025 at 6:45pm:

Bobby. wrote on Jan 23rd, 2025 at 5:40am: If Fauci is innocent he should welcome a trial where he can clear his name. Something like 20% of people in prison are innocent. Being innocent is no protection against prison.

I doubt it's 20%    ::)

More like 0.1%


Many people in jail claim they are not guilty of the crime they were imprisoned for
but some do admit they committed worse crimes that they were never charged for.

Leroy wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2025 at 3:17pm:

Dnarever wrote on Jan 23rd, 2025 at 3:12pm: The biden pardons are only meant as protection against the US's criminal President taking unfounded action with his weaponized DOJ. Have you any evidence or examples of weaponization  by the DOJ, or have you made that bit up?.

Both Trump and his appointees have promised that this is what they intend to do. Biden would have been foolish to have not believed them.


Quote:

Sept. 10, 2024, Over the past two weeks, former President Donald Trump has become increasingly explicit in describing plans to use the Department of Justice to prosecute scores of people he has declared corrupt, if he wins in November. Last Tuesday, Trump released a book in which he threatened to jail Mark Zuckerberg (Mark has bent over) Trump vowed to crack down on corruption in health agencies like the Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention In a social media post afterward, he threatened to carry out election fraud prosecutions against election clerks, campaign donors and others. Democratic National Convention, Trump reposted artificial intelligence-generated images of his enemies — including Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Nancy Pelosi, Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates — in orange jumpsuits special counsel Jack Smith with the statement, “He should be prosecuted for election interference & prosecutorial misconduct.” Trump posted photos of former President Barack Obama and former Republican Rep. Liz Cheney with text calling for their prosecution Davis has also said he would “rain hell on Washington, D.C.,” if he became attorney general and would “bring indictments” against President Joe Biden and members of his family, former President Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and George Soros, “These lawfare Democrats should lawyer up and be prepared for accountability on Jan. 20 at 12:01 p.m.,” Davis said. Project 2025, a conservative group, has called for slashing the number of career DOJ and FBI officials and replacing them with political appointees who will carry out Trump’s wishes. https://www.nbcnews.com/investigations/trump-vows-prosecute-political-foes-others-corrupt-cheaters-rcna169292

Trumps vendetta:


Quote:

Since 2022, when he began preparing for the presidential campaign, Trump has issued more than 100 threats to investigate, prosecute, imprison or otherwise punish his perceived opponents interviews and social media posts shows that the former president has repeatedly indicated that he would use federal law enforcement as part of a campaign to exact "retribution." Vice President Kamala Harris "should be impeached and prosecuted," Trump said at a rally last month. "I will appoint a real special prosecutor to go after the most corrupt president in the history of the United States of America, Joe Biden, and the entire Biden crime family," Trump said last year. "ELIZABETH LYNNE CHENEY IS GUILTY OF TREASON," reads one post Trump reposted on his social media site, Truth Social, regarding the former Republican congresswoman. "RETRUTH IF YOU WANT TELEVISED MILITARY TRIBUNALS." When right-wing radio host Glenn Beck asked Trump if he would lock up his opponents in a second term, Trump responded, "The answer is you have no choice because they're doing it to us." New York Attorney General Letitia James and Judge Arthur Engoron "should be arrested and punished accordingly," Trump said at a rally in January. Among the other targets of Trump's threats are former President Barack Obama ("RETRUTH IF YOU WANT PUBLIC MILITARY TRIBUNALS"), members of the U.S. Capitol Police who defended the Capitol during the Jan. 6, 2021, riot ("The cops should be charged and the protesters should be freed"), members of the Jan. 6 Select Committee in Congress In one instance, Trump suggested that Gen. Mark Milley, who served as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in his administration, could face execution "I just know that once he's in office with no guardrails, no reason to worry about reelection, and only the most fervent, loyal people surrounding him," Grisham said, "he will absolutely make sure his enemies pay for what he perceives to be their crimes." https://www.npr.org/2024/10/21/nx-s1-5134924/trump-election-2024-kamala-harris-elizabeth-cheney-threat-civil-liberties

https://m3.gab.com/media_attachments/95/97/25/9597257974805e6041b1ae43dd21147e.png

Bobby. wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2025 at 7:23pm:

https://m3.gab.com/media_attachments/95/97/25/9597257974805e6041b1ae43dd21147e.png

Most of the far right meetings I have attended were in boardrooms. occasionally another venue like a politicians office.

Dnarever wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2025 at 7:15pm:

Trumps vendetta: Quote: Since 2022, when he began preparing for the presidential campaign, Trump has issued more than 100 threats to investigate, prosecute, imprison or otherwise punish his perceived opponents interviews and social media posts shows that the former president has repeatedly indicated that he would use federal law enforcement as part of a campaign to exact "retribution." Vice President Kamala Harris "should be impeached and prosecuted," Trump said at a rally last month. "I will appoint a real special prosecutor to go after the most corrupt president in the history of the United States of America, Joe Biden, and the entire Biden crime family," Trump said last year. "ELIZABETH LYNNE CHENEY IS GUILTY OF TREASON," reads one post Trump reposted on his social media site, Truth Social, regarding the former Republican congresswoman. "RETRUTH IF YOU WANT TELEVISED MILITARY TRIBUNALS." When right-wing radio host Glenn Beck asked Trump if he would lock up his opponents in a second term, Trump responded, "The answer is you have no choice because they're doing it to us." New York Attorney General Letitia James and Judge Arthur Engoron "should be arrested and punished accordingly," Trump said at a rally in January. Among the other targets of Trump's threats are former President Barack Obama ("RETRUTH IF YOU WANT PUBLIC MILITARY TRIBUNALS"), members of the U.S. Capitol Police who defended the Capitol during the Jan. 6, 2021, riot ("The cops should be charged and the protesters should be freed"), members of the Jan. 6 Select Committee in Congress In one instance, Trump suggested that Gen. Mark Milley, who served as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in his administration, could face execution "I just know that once he's in office with no guardrails, no reason to worry about reelection, and only the most fervent, loyal people surrounding him," Grisham said, "he will absolutely make sure his enemies pay for what he perceives to be their crimes." https://www.npr.org/2024/10/21/nx-s1-5134924/trump-election-2024-kamala-harris-elizabeth-cheney-threat-civil-liberties

You mention Letitia James, her whole political campaign was to go after Trump and put him in jail. She was elected with the intention to jail Trump and stop him from running for president.

Can you believe that, a district attorney publicly announcing she is going to tear a mans life apart until she finds a crime.

You probably have not even heard of Letitia James and would not be aware of what she did.

Bobby. wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2025 at 7:23pm:

https://m3.gab.com/media_attachments/95/97/25/9597257974805e6041b1ae43dd21147e.png

see that tree on the right, FBI agent in there, but don't tell anyone. Stop looking at it you drawing attention.

https://m3.gab.com/media_attachments/71/47/7d/71477d175a10291c1215ba044192d287.png

Leroy wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2025 at 7:29pm:

Bobby. wrote on Jan 23rd, 2025 at 7:23pm: https://m3.gab.com/media_attachments/95/97/25/9597257974805e6041b1ae43dd21147e.png see that tree on the right, FBI agent in there, but don't tell anyone. Stop looking at it you drawing attention.

Trump will fix that.   ;)

Bobby. wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2025 at 7:30pm:

https://m3.gab.com/media_attachments/71/47/7d/71477d175a10291c1215ba044192d287.png

All this time and nobody realised that Melania is the Hamburglar.


https://images.hellomagazine.com/horizon/original_aspect_ratio/9598575582ac-gettyimages-2194435618.jpg

Well I guess all the hints were there a partner named Donald who is a clown.

Bobby. wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2025 at 6:58pm:

Dnarever wrote on Jan 23rd, 2025 at 6:45pm: Bobby. wrote on Jan 23rd, 2025 at 5:40am: If Fauci is innocent he should welcome a trial where he can clear his name. Something like 20% of people in prison are innocent. Being innocent is no protection against prison. I doubt it's 20%    ::) More like 0.1% Many people in jail claim they are not guilty of the crime they were imprisoned for but some do admit they committed worse crimes that they were never charged for.

They say that it is between 4% and 6% but that partially assumes that they work it out and release some, the reality is a lot more have to serve their full term. Some estimates go up to about 15% Many think this is close to the mark. More internal people with a vested interest seldom find a number over 1% for obvious reasons.

Any hypocrisy here?

I'm curious.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMyh7ko9L2g

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3c7Beo04c8c

https://i.postimg.cc/8C9pvkKp/whyjoe.jpg

https://m3.gab.com/media_attachments/bf/8a/cd/bf8acd07394776bf6cab3fd802db9e8c.png

Bobby. wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2025 at 11:13pm:

https://m3.gab.com/media_attachments/bf/8a/cd/bf8acd07394776bf6cab3fd802db9e8c.png

The Big Guy forgot to pardon himself… 😉

Any admission of guilt here?

I'm curious.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMyh7ko9L2g

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3c7Beo04c8c

Leroy wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2025 at 11:26pm:

If they have not committed a crime then what is the pardon for?.

To protect him from egotistical maniacs

https://m3.gab.com/media_attachments/71/47/7d/71477d175a10291c1215ba044192d287.png

Melania is from Slovenia. They pronounce ballot as bullet. She has the correct style of car.

SerialBrain9 wrote on Jan 24^th, 2025 at 6:37am:

Bobby. wrote on Jan 23rd, 2025 at 11:13pm: https://m3.gab.com/media_attachments/bf/8a/cd/bf8acd07394776bf6cab3fd802db9e8c.png The Big Guy forgot to pardon himself… 😉

https://m3.gab.com/media_attachments/bf/8a/cd/bf8acd07394776bf6cab3fd802db9e8c.png

Any admission of guilt here?

I'm curious.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMyh7ko9L2g

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3c7Beo04c8c

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2025 at 8:16pm:

Any hypocrisy here? I'm curious. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMyh7ko9L2g https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3c7Beo04c8c

Donald J. Trump is very much for the law and the US Constitution... but only when it suits him or his needs. Because he is who he is (a colossal egomaniac with a horrible orange tan), only he is allowed to pick and choose when to abide by the law and Constitution. No one else is allowed to do so, otherwise they shall be known as "radical".