https://i.imgur.com/xlHSReZ.png


Quote:

He who saves his Country does not violate any Law. Link

Some choice replies:

https://i.imgur.com/sze97yZ.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/IkcdtL3.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/j9DbkBw.jpg

This email doing the rounds likens Trump to Hitler -
is it a bit unfair?

QUOTE

In 1923 Adolf Hitler incited an insurrection against the German government.
He was tried, given a slap on the wrist, and became a convicted felon. Despite being treated charitably by the judge, Hitler claimed the trial was political persecution and successfully portrayed himself as a victim of the "corrupt" Social Democrats.

Hitler positioned himself as the voice of the "common man," railing against the "elites," cultural "degeneracy," and the establishment, who he all labeled as "Marxists." He claimed the education system was indoctrinating children to hate Germany, and promised to return Germany to greatness.

To solidify his base, Hitler masterfully scapegoated minorities for the nation's problems, exploiting societal divisions with an "us vs. them" narrative.Many Germans took the bait. Hitler's Nazi Party continued to gain traction, until he became Chancellor in 1933.

Hitler appointed German oligarchs as his economic advisors. He proceeded to privatize government run utilities, solidifying support of the economic elite. With the working class divided along cultural and ethnic lines, the Nazis shut down workers unions and abolished strikes. Progressives and trade unionists were imprisoned and sent to concentration camps. Corporate profits skyrocketed while working class Germans lived paycheck to paycheck.

Hitler, who became a billionaire while in office, knew he and his clan of oligarchs could get away with the scam if they constantly had an "enemy within" to blame while the corporatocracy robbed the country blind.

An easy target was one of the smallest minorities. Hitler removed birthright citizenship rights of Jews and started rounding them up for mass deportations for being "illegally" in the country. The German press under Nazi rule highlighted instances of violence by Jews to convince the public that Jewish immigrants were a danger to the "real Germans."

Hitler wasted no time dismantling democratic institutions. Loyalty wasn't just encouraged; it was demanded. Opponents were silenced. Media that dared to questioned him were vilified as "the enemy" and "Marxists."

Hitler's Propaganda Minister, Joseph Goebbels, bragged about how the Nazis were able to intimidate the media into giving them favorable coverage, and didn't need to give direct orders.
The Nazi regime and its followers collected all books they saw as promoting "degeneracy" or what would be considered "woke" today, and burned them in large bonfires. They also burned books that promoted class consciousness.

Berlin had a thriving LGBTQ community in the 1920s, and even had the first transgender clinic. The Nazis burned it to the ground. LGBTQ people were sent to concentration camps and forced to wear triangle badges. Many were killed in the Holocaust.

The Nazis also saw manhood as under threat by independent women who didn't rely on men. In 1934, Hitler proclaimed, "A woman's world is her husband, her family, her children, her house." Laws that had protected women's rights were repealed and new laws were introduced to restrict women to the home and in their roles as wives and mothers. Reproductive rights were severely rolled back, and doctors who performed abortions could face the death penalty.

Hitler decentralized the government to the most extreme extent, whereby he reduced its power in order to retain all of the power, over all of the people, for himself. A ruthless, brutal dictator and murderer of millions of human beings was the result.
The parallels are shockingly obvious. People are falling in line just as he wants and expects them to. Please copy/paste and share this as much as you can to help educate more people as to what is going on, so we can grow the movement to fight back against this bully and his attempted oppression.

Bobby. wrote on Feb 17^th, 2025 at 2:31pm:

This email doing the rounds likens Trump to Hitler - is it a bit unfair?

Yeah, a bit unfair.

Hitler wasn't an adjudicated rapist.

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 17^th, 2025 at 4:29pm:

Bobby. wrote on Feb 17th, 2025 at 2:31pm: This email doing the rounds likens Trump to Hitler - is it a bit unfair? Yeah, a bit unfair. Hitler wasn't an adjudicated rapist.

He's still bad?



https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/159/104/733/original/e97cdd42a04f2070.jpg

Bobby. wrote on Feb 17^th, 2025 at 5:15pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 17th, 2025 at 4:29pm: Bobby. wrote on Feb 17th, 2025 at 2:31pm: This email doing the rounds likens Trump to Hitler - is it a bit unfair? Yeah, a bit unfair. Hitler wasn't an adjudicated rapist. He's still bad?

Oh yeah, Hitler was bad alright.

They don't come much worse.

But to liken him to Trump is a bit unfair, as Adolph wasn't an adjudicated rapist.

Apart from that though, I guess they're pretty similar.

https://aph.org.au/wp-content/uploads/sites/55/2020/11/Hitler-Trump2.gif

Although, I'm guessing Trump can't grow facial hair.

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 17^th, 2025 at 5:38pm:

Bobby. wrote on Feb 17th, 2025 at 5:15pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 17th, 2025 at 4:29pm: Bobby. wrote on Feb 17th, 2025 at 2:31pm: This email doing the rounds likens Trump to Hitler - is it a bit unfair? Yeah, a bit unfair. Hitler wasn't an adjudicated rapist. He's still bad? Oh yeah, Hitler was bad alright. They don't come much worse. But to liken him to Trump is a bit unfair, as Adolph wasn't an adjudicated rapist. Apart from that though, I guess they're pretty similar. https://aph.org.au/wp-content/uploads/sites/55/2020/11/Hitler-Trump2.gif Although, I'm guessing Trump can't grow facial hair.

Wank on, hideous, despicable creep.

That's all you ever do, skin crawling freak.

Frank wrote on Feb 17^th, 2025 at 9:14pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 17th, 2025 at 5:38pm: Bobby. wrote on Feb 17th, 2025 at 5:15pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 17th, 2025 at 4:29pm: Bobby. wrote on Feb 17th, 2025 at 2:31pm: This email doing the rounds likens Trump to Hitler - is it a bit unfair? Yeah, a bit unfair. Hitler wasn't an adjudicated rapist. He's still bad? Oh yeah, Hitler was bad alright. They don't come much worse. But to liken him to Trump is a bit unfair, as Adolph wasn't an adjudicated rapist. Apart from that though, I guess they're pretty similar. https://aph.org.au/wp-content/uploads/sites/55/2020/11/Hitler-Trump2.gif Although, I'm guessing Trump can't grow facial hair. Wank on, hideous, despicable creep. That's all you ever do, skin crawling freak.

Which part do you have an issue with - the facial hair?

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cc7zOwaUMAE9_-3.jpg

Greggy,
it's easy to put a moustache on anyone    ::)


https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/04/25/00/84058663-13347365-image-m-11_1714002223784.jpg


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/nba/article-13347365/Andrew-Bogut-shares-video-Anthony-Albanese-Prime-Minister-Adolf-Hitler-Nazi-Elon-Musk-Wakeley-church-stabbing.html

Bobby. wrote on Feb 18^th, 2025 at 11:17am:

Greggy, it's easy to put a moustache on anyone

How easy to create Project 2025?

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/ea/Elon_Musk_gesture.gif

KangAnon wrote on Feb 17^th, 2025 at 12:55pm:

https://i.imgur.com/xlHSReZ.png Quote: He who saves his Country does not violate any Law. Link Some choice replies: https://i.imgur.com/sze97yZ.jpg https://i.imgur.com/IkcdtL3.jpg https://i.imgur.com/j9DbkBw.jpg

;D ;D :D :D :D

Twiggewed!!

Trump’s Napoleon Quote Baits the Left Into Yet Another Meltdown


Next - Fu Manchu
https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1739137765/109#109  8-)

Bobby. wrote on Feb 17^th, 2025 at 2:31pm:

This email doing the rounds likens Trump to Hitler - is it a bit unfair? QUOTE In 1923 Adolf Hitler incited an insurrection against the German government. He was tried, given a slap on the wrist, and became a convicted felon. Despite being treated charitably by the judge, Hitler claimed the trial was political persecution and successfully portrayed himself as a victim of the "corrupt" Social Democrats. Hitler positioned himself as the voice of the "common man," railing against the "elites," cultural "degeneracy," and the establishment, who he all labeled as "Marxists." He claimed the education system was indoctrinating children to hate Germany, and promised to return Germany to greatness. To solidify his base, Hitler masterfully scapegoated minorities for the nation's problems, exploiting societal divisions with an "us vs. them" narrative.Many Germans took the bait. Hitler's Nazi Party continued to gain traction, until he became Chancellor in 1933. Hitler appointed German oligarchs as his economic advisors. He proceeded to privatize government run utilities, solidifying support of the economic elite. With the working class divided along cultural and ethnic lines, the Nazis shut down workers unions and abolished strikes. Progressives and trade unionists were imprisoned and sent to concentration camps. Corporate profits skyrocketed while working class Germans lived paycheck to paycheck. Hitler, who became a billionaire while in office, knew he and his clan of oligarchs could get away with the scam if they constantly had an "enemy within" to blame while the corporatocracy robbed the country blind. An easy target was one of the smallest minorities. Hitler removed birthright citizenship rights of Jews and started rounding them up for mass deportations for being "illegally" in the country. The German press under Nazi rule highlighted instances of violence by Jews to convince the public that Jewish immigrants were a danger to the "real Germans." Hitler wasted no time dismantling democratic institutions. Loyalty wasn't just encouraged; it was demanded. Opponents were silenced. Media that dared to questioned him were vilified as "the enemy" and "Marxists." Hitler's Propaganda Minister, Joseph Goebbels, bragged about how the Nazis were able to intimidate the media into giving them favorable coverage, and didn't need to give direct orders. The Nazi regime and its followers collected all books they saw as promoting "degeneracy" or what would be considered "woke" today, and burned them in large bonfires. They also burned books that promoted class consciousness. Berlin had a thriving LGBTQ community in the 1920s, and even had the first transgender clinic. The Nazis burned it to the ground. LGBTQ people were sent to concentration camps and forced to wear triangle badges. Many were killed in the Holocaust. The Nazis also saw manhood as under threat by independent women who didn't rely on men. In 1934, Hitler proclaimed, "A woman's world is her husband, her family, her children, her house." Laws that had protected women's rights were repealed and new laws were introduced to restrict women to the home and in their roles as wives and mothers. Reproductive rights were severely rolled back, and doctors who performed abortions could face the death penalty. Hitler decentralized the government to the most extreme extent, whereby he reduced its power in order to retain all of the power, over all of the people, for himself. A ruthless, brutal dictator and murderer of millions of human beings was the result. The parallels are shockingly obvious. People are falling in line just as he wants and expects them to. Please copy/paste and share this as much as you can to help educate more people as to what is going on, so we can grow the movement to fight back against this bully and his attempted oppression.

Hitler did some good things, Bobi. DL said.

White Protection League 101, innit.

Frank wrote on Feb 18^th, 2025 at 1:24pm:

KangAnon wrote on Feb 17th, 2025 at 12:55pm: https://i.imgur.com/xlHSReZ.png Quote: He who saves his Country does not violate any Law. Link Some choice replies: https://i.imgur.com/sze97yZ.jpg https://i.imgur.com/IkcdtL3.jpg https://i.imgur.com/j9DbkBw.jpg ;D ;D :D :D :D Twiggewed!! Trump’s Napoleon Quote Baits the Left Into Yet Another Meltdown Next - Fu Manchu https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1739137765/109#109  8-)

Trying to defend trump by pointing out the quote was from Napoleon, like we didn't already know that, but who was a man whose boundless ambition wrought devastation, enslaving nations and countless lives for his personal empire-building.

Pointing out Trump's choice of idols isn't the mic drop you think it is...

How do you have any feet left?

KangAnon wrote on Feb 18^th, 2025 at 1:52pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 18th, 2025 at 1:24pm: KangAnon wrote on Feb 17th, 2025 at 12:55pm: https://i.imgur.com/xlHSReZ.png Quote: He who saves his Country does not violate any Law. Link Some choice replies: https://i.imgur.com/sze97yZ.jpg https://i.imgur.com/IkcdtL3.jpg https://i.imgur.com/j9DbkBw.jpg ;D ;D :D :D :D Twiggewed!! Trump’s Napoleon Quote Baits the Left Into Yet Another Meltdown Next - Fu Manchu https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1739137765/109#109  8-) Trying to defend trump by pointing out the quote was from Napoleon, like we didn't already know that, but who was a man whose boundless ambition wrought devastation, enslaving nations and countless lives for his personal empire-building. Pointing out Trump's choice of idols isn't the mic drop you think it is... How do you have any feet left?

:D
You pompous ass!

Karnal wrote on Feb 18^th, 2025 at 1:29pm:

Hitler did some good things, Bobi. DL said. White Protection League 101, innit.

Hitler protected White people and he built the Autobahn.

While there is no evidence that Napoleon ever spoke these words, different versions of the quote have been attributed to the French leader many times over the last century and a half. It is sort of a folklore distillation of Napoleon’s claim to legitimacy.

The idea that a leader who acts to save his country should not be considered a criminal has deep roots in political philosophy, stretching back to Cicero, the Roman statesman and orator. In his work De Legibus (On the Laws), Cicero argued that salus populi suprema lex esto—”the welfare of the people shall be the supreme law.”  Trump’s invocation of the Waterloo quote plays on this same theme—suggesting that, far from being a usurper, he represents the will of the people against a corrupt elite.

For Trump’s critics, the post was proof of their worst fears, confirmation that he sees himself as a leader who transcends legal constraints.

The modern concept of Bonapartism was shaped primarily by Karl Marx’s study of Napoleon III, the nephew of Napoleon Bonaparte, in The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. Marx saw Bonapartism as a phenomenon that emerges when the political class is too weak or fragmented to govern effectively, creating an opening for a leader who appeals directly to the people, often by casting himself as a national savior above party politics.

This characterization of Bonapartism has also been scrutinized by conservative thinkers, who have typically viewed it with skepticism. In 19th-century Prussia, King Frederick William IV and his advisor Leopold von Gerlach saw Bonapartism as a destabilizing force that combined mass politics with executive absolutism, undermining the role of traditional institutions like the monarchy, the aristocracy, and the church. Gerlach famously described Bonapartism as “the dangerous and great power… this child of the vile marriage of absolutism and liberalism,” highlighting the way it fused state control with popular mobilization.

French historian René Rémond later expanded on this by identifying Bonapartism as one of the three major traditions of the French right, alongside Legitimism and Orléanism. Where Legitimists favored the restoration of the Bourbon monarchy and Orléanists championed a constitutional, business-friendly monarchy, Bonapartists represented a strong, centralized executive power that operated outside traditional party structures. Rémond saw figures like General Georges Boulanger, who nearly overthrew the Third Republic in the 1880s, as inheritors of this tradition. Some elements of Bonapartism even carried into Charles de Gaulle’s leadership style, though he maintained democratic legitimacy.

But if Bonapartism is defined by centralizing executive power beyond traditional constraints, then the comparison to Trump quickly falls apart. Unlike Napoleon, who established an imperial regime, expanded state control, and restructured France’s governing institutions to concentrate power in himself, Trump is doing the opposite—dismantling entrenched bureaucracies and pushing power out of Washington. His presidency has been about firing, not hiring, career officials; cutting, not growing, federal agencies; and withdrawing, not expanding, military commitments abroad. The irony is that his critics accuse him of hoarding power while simultaneously demanding that power remain with the very institutions that resist democratic oversight.

Perhaps a better paradigm to compare Trump and Napoleon is the perspective of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, the German philosopher. Hegel held Napoleon Bonaparte in high regard, viewing him as a pivotal figure in world history. Hegel saw Napoleon as the embodiment of the “World Spirit”—a personification of the historical force driving humanity toward greater freedom and self-awareness. This admiration is evident in a letter Hegel wrote to his friend Friedrich Immanuel Niethammer on October 13, 1806, during the Battle of Jena, where he described witnessing Napoleon:

“I saw the Emperor—this world-soul—riding out of the city on reconnaissance. It is indeed a wonderful sensation to see such an individual, who, concentrated here at a single point, astride a horse, reaches out over the world and masters it.”

Hegel argued that certain individuals, like Napoleon, played crucial roles in actualizing the progression of history. These “world-historical figures” emerge when existing societal structures become obsolete, acting as agents of change who, through their actions, advance the development of human freedom and consciousness. In Napoleon’s case, Hegel saw the consolidation of the revolutionary ideals of liberty and equality into a new political order, marking a significant transformation in the historical landscape.

Friedrich Nietzsche saw Napoleon Bonaparte as a figure who illustrated the tensions within the noble ideal, a man who reshaped history through sheer force of will but whose career exposed the limits of power and greatness. In On the Genealogy of Morals, Nietzsche described Napoleon as “this synthesis of the inhuman and the superhuman,” admiring his ability to transcend conventional morality and impose his vision upon the world. Napoleon was, for Nietzsche, not simply a conqueror, but a living challenge to the mediocrity and complacency of his time—someone who seized destiny rather than submitting to it.



Trump is a MARXIST!!!!

Yet as the German-American scholar of political philosophy Leo Strauss observed, Nietzsche did not regard Napoleon as the ideal of nobility itself, but rather as the problem of the noble ideal incarnate. Napoleon demonstrated how difficult it is for a great man to be both powerful and truly noble. “However much one might admire Napoleon, he is not striking as a very noble man, as Nietzsche himself says,” Strauss told his students in a 1967 seminar on Nietzsche.

Bonapartism Is Not Fascism—And Trump Is No Napoleon
Predictably, some commentators have rushed to conflate Bonapartism with fascism. But Napoleon’s rule was not defined by racial ideology, totalitarian control, or a militarized police state. He was a pragmatist who consolidated power in the wake of revolutionary chaos and worked to stabilize France. Unlike fascist dictators, Napoleon did not seek to abolish the old order outright but to restore it under his authority.

Trump’s presidency does not fit the mold of a Bonapartist regime, let alone a fascist one. His administration has not expanded the size of government but has worked to reduce it. His second term has been marked by aggressive efforts to fire entrenched bureaucrats, weaken regulatory agencies, and scale back America’s global military commitments. If his critics truly believed he was a dictator in the making, they would not be fighting to prevent him from shrinking the federal government. If they feared authoritarianism, they would not be racing to court to demand that unelected agencies be allowed to operate outside of presidential oversight. And they would not be decrying Vice President J.D. Vance’s defense of free speech in Europe if they feared Trump was going to curtail freedom in America.

The contradiction at the heart of the opposition to Trump is that those who claim to defend democracy seem most anxious to keep power in the hands of institutions that have become immune to democratic control in recent decades. The fear is not that Trump will become too powerful but that he will weaken the administrative state’s hold over the country.

A Fight Over Who Governs
The broader reaction to Trump’s post reflects the deeper conflict at the center of American politics today. His critics see his presidency as an existential threat, not because of what he has done, but because of what he represents: a direct challenge to a political establishment that believes it alone has the right to govern. Their insistence that he is a dictator has little to do with his actual use of power and everything to do with their fear that they have lost control over the system.

Trump’s Napoleon quote was not a statement of legal philosophy, nor was it a blueprint for authoritarian rule. It was a provocation, a carefully chosen historical reference designed to trigger the exact response it received.

KangAnon wrote on Feb 17^th, 2025 at 12:55pm:

https://i.imgur.com/xlHSReZ.png Quote: He who saves his Country does not violate any Law. Link Some choice replies: https://i.imgur.com/sze97yZ.jpg https://i.imgur.com/IkcdtL3.jpg https://i.imgur.com/j9DbkBw.jpg

WINNING: Trump Announces Plan To Attack The British And Prussian Forces At Waterloo

https://media.babylonbee.com/articles/67b39573ee1c767b39573ee1c8.jpg

WASHINGTON, D.C. — America's resurgence reached a new level this morning, as President Donald Trump announced a plan to attack the British and Prussian forces at Waterloo, effective immediately.

The announcement of the new offensive came on the heels of President Trump boldly declaring on social media over the weekend that "He who saves his country violates no law." Trump reportedly declared the Waterloo attack while posing for an oil painting with one hand tucked into his jacket.

"It's like I always say, folks. Victory belongs to the most persevering, it really does, when you think about it," Trump said according to one insider. "We will march to Waterloo. We will take the fight to the British and the Prussians. And we will be victorious. Just remember to never fight uphill, me boys."

Trump, who was seen wearing a bicorne hat around the White House today, had grown increasingly intent on displacing the British Empire from its perch on the global stage, going so far as to ask his military advisors for strategies to disrupt British trade routes to India. "The battlefield is a scene of constant chaos," Trump reportedly said. "The winner will be the one who controls that chaos, both his own and the enemy's. We will have the biggest, most beautiful victory. It will be so tremendous."

When one aide pointed out that this type of move had never been attempted in America's history, Trump rebuffed the notion. "History is the version of past events that people have decided to agree upon. A wise man once said that. Now it's even better when I say it."

At publishing time, Trump had asked the White House chef to exclusively serve Napoleons as dessert for every meal from now on.

Hitler did some good things too, Bobby. How do we know?

DL said.

Frank wrote on Feb 18^th, 2025 at 3:26pm:

While there is no evidence that Napoleon ever spoke these words

I was wondering when you'd pick that up...  Funny how you'd accuse anyone you disagreed with after making a mistake like that of lying, especially when you've made no effort to correct your initial claim.

KangAnon wrote on Feb 21^st, 2025 at 5:25pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 18th, 2025 at 3:26pm: While there is no evidence that Napoleon ever spoke these words I was wondering when you'd pick that up...  Funny how you'd accuse anyone you disagreed with after making a mistake like that of lying, especially when you've made no effort to correct your initial claim.

You silly, pompous ass. What mistake are you talking about?

What have you misunderstood this time?

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 18^th, 2025 at 11:23am:

Bobby. wrote on Feb 18th, 2025 at 11:17am: Greggy, it's easy to put a moustache on anyone  How easy to create Project 2025? https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/ea/Elon_Musk_gesture.gif

Peace of cake, Greggery, but you've gotta have a plan. The SM vibes with that. It helps him bounce out of bed to start the day, you see. His plan goes something like this.

First, the donor elites come up, tears in their eyes, saying please sir, do this great new project, there's a nice little drink in it for you.

Look, SM says, we'll have to wait and see what happens. How much?

When the fake news turn up, asking annoying questions, SM says, oh? Never heard about it. Not on my watch, never ever. Next!

The Big Tech globalist elites come on board, as they do, craft a propaganda campaign with cash prize giveaways and wins him the election. Elon crashes the SM's transition meetings, you can't exactly chuck him out, so SM introduces Elon to the donor elites with their cunning project.

When they come up with a plan, the SM says all good, do that, here's the keys to the agencies. Fire whoever you like, I'm heading over to Doral for 18 holes.

Elon's put enough money in already, so he finds some 20 year old interns to put in charge of the federal government. They've even designed a nice new server. It's still in the experimental stage, but it should be fun.

When the planes start crashing, the new servers collapse and voters get their bank accounts cleaned out because Russia now has their data, SM blames Sleepy Joe and, for some reason only known to him,  transvestites.

The SM tries to simplify it, make it really easy, spell it out for the chodes:

D.E.I.

Do you see? That's where you put useless, incompetent people in jobs they're totally unsuited for, then blame the leftards when it all turns to shit.

Easy peasy, no?

Karnal wrote on Feb 21^st, 2025 at 8:26pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 18th, 2025 at 11:23am: Bobby. wrote on Feb 18th, 2025 at 11:17am: Greggy, it's easy to put a moustache on anyone  How easy to create Project 2025? https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/ea/Elon_Musk_gesture.gif Peace of cake, Greggery, but you've gotta have a plan. The SM vibes with that. It helps him bounce out of bed to start the day, you see. His plan goes something like this. First, the donor elites come up, tears in their eyes, saying please sir, do this great new project, there's a nice little drink in it for you. Look, SM says, we'll have to wait and see what happens. How much? When the fake news turn up, asking annoying questions, SM says, oh? Never heard about it. Not on my watch, never ever. Next! The Big Tech globalist elites come on board, as they do, craft a propaganda campaign with cash prize giveaways and wins him the election. Elon crashes the SM's transition meetings, you can't exactly chuck him out, so SM introduces Elon to the donor elites with their cunning project. When they come up with a plan, the SM says all good, do that, here's the keys to the agencies. Fire whoever you like, I'm heading over to Doral for 18 holes. Elon's put enough money in already, so he finds some 20 year old interns to put in charge of the federal government. They've even designed a nice new server. It's still in the experimental stage, but it should be fun. When the planes start crashing, the new servers collapse and voters get their bank accounts cleaned out because Russia now has their data, SM blames Sleepy Joe and, for some reason only known to him,  transvestites. The SM tries to simplify it, make it really easy, spell it out for the chodes: D.E.I. Do you see? That's where you put useless, incompetent people in jobs they're totally unsuited for, then blame the leftards when it all turns to shit. Easy peasy, no?

Who ordered the waffle, paki?