Australian Politics Forum - EVOLUTION VS RELIGION

Classic Liberal

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 769
sydney
Gender: male

Re: My proof for creation.
Reply #195 - Jun 12^th, 2007 at 9:09pm

Evolution is not adaption.

everything adapts but their genes stay essentially the same and so over a long period of time a human will always be a human though his/her skin may change etc.

evolution is random mutation of genes where by a mutation that is advantagous causes this new species to become dominent.

the adaption evolutionary theory is a fairy story no serious scientist supports it.

that is why its so unlikely, imagine the amount of random mutations that need to occur for us to get here.

Back to top

IP Logged

IQSRLOW Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 1618	Re: My proof for creation. Reply #196 - Jun 12^th, 2007 at 10:39pm that is why its so unlikely Although a tad slightly more likely than an all-seeing and all-knowing entity prepared to bring down his wrath on those who do not follow the 'one' true path
Back to top	Political Animal has little moderation. It is the forum for free speech and free thinkers to converse passionately without the threat of being banned. It is a forum for adults. IP Logged

AusNat Ex Member Gender:	Re: My proof for creation. Reply #197 - Jun 12^th, 2007 at 10:43pm IQSRLOW wrote on Jun 12^th, 2007 at 10:39pm: that is why its so unlikely Although a tad slightly more likely than an all-seeing and all-knowing entity prepared to bring down his wrath on those who do not follow the 'one' true path Definately! cant believe some still think ''God'' created all.
Back to top	Total anti-marxist and anti-left wing. The Right is Right.&&&&&& IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 48856 At my desk.	Re: My proof for creation. Reply #198 - Jun 13^th, 2007 at 12:57pm In case anyone is interested, evolution is not a scientific theory: http://www.ozpolitic.com/evolution/evolution-not-scientific-theory.html
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

Classic Liberal Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 769 sydney Gender:	Re: My proof for creation. Reply #199 - Jun 13^th, 2007 at 6:52pm i rest my case. creation not scientific. evolution is not scientific. I do not disagree with natural selection, in fact i believe it to be very true, but evolution
Back to top	IP Logged

AusNat

Ex Member

Gender:

Re: My proof for creation.
Reply #200 - Jun 13^th, 2007 at 7:43pm

Classic Liberal wrote on Jun 13^th, 2007 at 6:52pm:

i rest my case.

creation not scientific.

evolution is not scientific.

I do not disagree with natural selection, in fact i believe it to be very true, but evolution Cheesy

You pender, are a MORON. Evolution is fact. All is scientific. Do you seriously believe the human race started off with just two people? of course you do. Because you adhere to an ''education system'' which is over 1500 years old- when people believed in dragons and unicorns and were living in squalor.

Back to top

Total anti-marxist and anti-left wing. The Right is Right.&&&&&&

IP Logged

IQSRLOW

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 1618

Re: My proof for creation.
Reply #201 - Jun 13^th, 2007 at 8:44pm

Classic Liberal wrote on Jun 13^th, 2007 at 6:52pm:

i rest my case.

creation not scientific.

evolution is not scientific.

I do not disagree with natural selection, in fact i believe it to be very true, but evolution Cheesy

I'll second the 'moron' submission.

Evolution is not a theory in the definitive sense of the word, but it is scientific. Creationism is stupidity to the highest degree and nothing more than a sad reflection on our society.

God and science can co-exist as long as you bible thumpers keep your noses out of where you don't belong.

Back to top

Political Animal has little moderation. It is the forum for free speech and free thinkers to converse passionately without the threat of being banned. It is a forum for adults.

IP Logged

AusNat

Ex Member

Gender:

Re: My proof for creation.
Reply #202 - Jun 13^th, 2007 at 8:51pm

Quote:

Creationism is stupidity to the highest degree and nothing more than a sad reflection on our society.

Damn right. its just religious freaks realising their beliefs are wrong and so they are trying to stick their fingers into the pie. ''Intelligent design'' is not god made, but man made. we are the geniuses who create. NOT ''GOD''.

Quote:

God and science can co-exist as long as you bible thumpers keep your noses out of where you don't belong.

They could, just like fairy tales and history books are seperated.

Back to top

Total anti-marxist and anti-left wing. The Right is Right.&&&&&&

IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 48856 At my desk.	Re: My proof for creation. Reply #203 - Jun 14^th, 2007 at 10:58am There is no need for personal attacks. Why is it always the 'evolutionists' who resort to the immature tactics? Evolution is a theory. It is not scientific.
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

AusNat

Ex Member

Gender:

Re: My proof for creation.
Reply #204 - Jun 14^th, 2007 at 11:31am

freediver wrote on Jun 14^th, 2007 at 10:58am:

There is no need for personal attacks. Why is it always the 'evolutionists' who resort to the immature tactics?

Evolution is a theory. It is not scientific.

Because its so inconceivable that people in the 21st century still think ''god'' created everything.
Evolution IS a scientific fact. not a theory. Marxism is a theory.

Back to top

Total anti-marxist and anti-left wing. The Right is Right.&&&&&&

IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 48856 At my desk.	Re: My proof for creation. Reply #205 - Jun 14^th, 2007 at 11:33am People only call a theory like this a 'scientific fact' if they do not understand the scientific method. Just because you do not understand someone else's perspective is no excuse for resorting to childish name calling.
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

AusNat Ex Member Gender:	Re: My proof for creation. Reply #206 - Jun 14^th, 2007 at 11:39am Name calling? i called pender a Moron simply because he is one. I MEANT IT. What makes you think i dont understand the scientific process? What if science is a hobby of mine?
Back to top	Total anti-marxist and anti-left wing. The Right is Right.&&&&&& IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48856
At my desk.

Re: My proof for creation.
Reply #207 - Jun 14^th, 2007 at 11:45am

Just because science is a hobby of yours does not mean you understand the scientific method. There is no such thing as a 'scientific fact.' It is sometimes used to refer to direct observations, but even these are influenced by your paradigm. Most scientific theories end up being disproven eventually, even ones that are considered solid facts by lay men.

I know you meant it. It is still childish. It reflects more on your inability to discuss the issue maturely and consider alternative perspectives.

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

IQSRLOW Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 1618	Re: My proof for creation. Reply #208 - Jun 14^th, 2007 at 12:15pm Creation is not an alternative
Back to top	Political Animal has little moderation. It is the forum for free speech and free thinkers to converse passionately without the threat of being banned. It is a forum for adults. IP Logged

Sprintcyclist Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 40717 Gender:	Re: My proof for creation. Reply #209 - Jun 14^th, 2007 at 12:30pm I wonder why God made morons ?
Back to top	Modern Classic Right Wing IP Logged