Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 
Send Topic Print
Is Islam inherently violent? (Read 86441 times)
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Is Islam inherently violent?
Reply #315 - May 29th, 2008 at 10:35am
 
Helian,

I agree with you that the actions of selected self-proclaimed Christians and Muslims in the past have been far from charitable or merciful.

However the vast majority of Christians or Muslims are about as peaceable in nature as the vast majority of atheists.

It's an unreasonable expectation that one group of human beings would be any more peaceful than another group of human beings regardless of creed, because the personal viewpoint of the vast majority is  considerably watered down from the Christianity or Islam of the respective experts (priests or imams).

To say that Muslims are inherently violent is as much a mischaracterisation as saying that Christians or Atheists are inherently violent.  This has certainly not been my experience, and I have travelled quite widely.

Basically it comes down to the fact that we are all human beings.
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: Is Islam inherently violent?
Reply #316 - May 29th, 2008 at 10:36am
 
Sprintcyclist, you spend a lot of time obsessing over Islam - a religion the world has lived with for 1400 years and we haven't all blown up yet.

One day you will realise that this obsession is all about yourself and not your need to do us all a favour by putting the world to rights.

Remember the great haters like Luther were far greater theologians than you can ever hope to be and they managed to find justification in the bible for their vilest fantasies against another religion. In fact you can probably thank Luther for the mess the middle east is in regarding Israel and Palestine. Had Jews not been so badly mistreated by Christians in Europe, they would have had no reason to leave en masse in the first place, (the ones that weren't murdered by a Luther-quoting evil regime).

So do yourself (and us) a favour and find a more constructive way to build bridges between faiths instead of finding ways to persecute Muslims for their beliefs.
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 29th, 2008 at 1:19pm by NorthOfNorth »  

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Online


OzPolitic

Posts: 40683
Gender: male
Re: Is Islam inherently violent?
Reply #317 - May 29th, 2008 at 10:52am
 
helian - no, it makes no difference if people are following any belief correctly or not if I am being killed.

What quotes did luther/hitler use ?




muso - it is not the nonextremist believers of any belief that are of any concern.


helian - feel free to disprove my quotes.


Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: Is Islam inherently violent?
Reply #318 - May 29th, 2008 at 12:53pm
 
Sprintcyclist wrote on May 29th, 2008 at 10:52am:
helian - no, it makes no difference if people are following any belief correctly or not if I am being killed.
What quotes did luther/hitler use ?


That's the point Sprintcyclist... they did believe or chose to believe they were following the dictates of Christianity.

Excerpts from 'On the Jews and Their Lies' - Martin Luther

He did not call them Abraham's children, but a "brood of vipers" [Matt. 3:7]. Oh, that was too insulting for the noble blood and race of Israel, and they declared, "He has a demon' [Matt 11:18]. Our Lord also calls them a "brood of vipers"; furthermore in John 8 [:39,44] he states: "If you were Abraham's children ye would do what Abraham did.... You are of your father the devil. It was intolerable to them to hear that they were not Abraham's but the devil's children, nor can they bear to hear this today.

To be sure, I am not a Jew, but I really do not like to contemplate God's awful wrath toward this people... Well, let the Jews regard our Lord Jesus as they will. We behold the fulfilment of the words spoken by him in Luke 21:20: "But when you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies, then know that its desolation has come near ... for these are days of vengeance. For great distress shall be upon the earth and wrath upon this people.

Learn from this dear Christian, what you are doing if you permit the blind Jews to mislead you. Then the saying will truly apply, 'When a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into the pit" [cf. Luke 6:39].

In brief, our evangelists also tell us what their rabbis taught. In Matthew 15:4 we read that they abrogated the fourth commandment, which enjoins honour of father and mother; and in Matthew 23, that they were given to much shameful doctrine, not to mention what Christ says in Matthew 5 about how they preached and interpreted the Ten Commandments so deviously, how they installed money-changers, traders, and all sorts of usurers in the temple, prompting our Lord to say that they had made the house of God into a den of robbers [Matt. 21:13; Luke 19:46]. Now figure out for yourself what a great honour that is and how the temple is filled with such glory that God must call his own house a den of robbers because so many souls had been murdered through their greedy, false doctrine, that is, through double idolatry. The Jews still persist in such doctrine to the present day. They imitate their fathers and pervert God's word. They are steeped in greed, in usury, they steal and murder where they can and ever teach their children to do likewise.

Now as I began to ask earlier: What harm has the poor Jesus done to the most holy children of Israel that they cannot stop cursing him after his death, with which he paid his debt? Is it perhaps that he aspires to be the Messiah, which they cannot tolerate? Oh no, for he is dead. They themselves crucified him, and a dead person cannot be the Messiah. Perhaps he is an obstacle to their return into their homeland? No, that is not the reason either; for how can a dead man prevent that? What, then, is the reason? I will tell you. As I said before, it is the lightning and thunder of Moses to which I referred before: "The Lord will smite you with madness and blindness and confusion of mind." It is the eternal fire of which the prophets speak: "My wrath will go forth like fire, and burn with none to quench it" [Jer. 4:4]. John the Baptist proclaimed the same message to them after Herod had removed their sceptre, saying [Luke 3:17]: "His winnowing fork is in his hand, and he will clear his threshing-floor and gather his wheat into his granary, but his chaff he will burn with unquenchable fire." Indeed, such fire of divine wrath we behold descending on the Jews. We see it burning, ablaze and aflame, a fire more horrible than that of Sodom and Gomorrah.

What are we poor preachers to do meanwhile? In the first place, we will believe that our Lord Jesus Christ is truthful when he declares of the Jews who did not accept but crucified him, "You are a brood of vipers and children of the devil [cf. Matt. 12:34].

And Christ himself declares in John 4:22, "Salvation is from the Jews." Therefore they boast of being the noblest, yes, the only noble people on earth

No, you vile father of such blasphemous Jews, you hellish devil, these are the facts: God has preached long enough to your children, the Jews, publicly and with miraculous signs throughout the world. He has done so for almost fifteen hundred years now, and still preaches. They were and still are obliged to obey him; but they were hardened and ever resisted, blasphemed, and cursed. Therefore we Christians, in turn are obliged not to tolerate their wanton and conscious blasphemy. As we heard above, "He who hates the Son also hates the Father" [John 15:23].

We, indeed, have such a Messiah, who says to us (John 11:25): "I am the resurrection and the life; he who believes in me, though he die, yet shall he live, and whoever lives and believes in me shall never die." And John 8:51: "Truly, truly, I say to you, if any one keeps my word, he will never see death." The Jews and the Turks care nothing for such a Messiah. And why should they? They must have a Messiah from the fool's paradise, who will satisfy their stinking belly, and who will die together with them like a cow or dog.
Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Online


OzPolitic

Posts: 40683
Gender: male
Re: Is Islam inherently violent?
Reply #319 - May 29th, 2008 at 1:21pm
 
helian - thanks for posting that.
If i was the one being killed, it wold not be a concerned that anyone had interperetd or misinterpereted any teachings.
I'ld be more concerned about dying.


Martin luther was a real virulent preacher indeed !! I had not read any of his stuff before. I can't see his logic.


One of the great weaknesses of the churches is they have not encouraged people to read the whole bible themselves and come to their own understandings.
It gives one the bigger picture, puts thngs in perspective.
Anyone who had read their own bible would totally disregard this speech.

I won't worry about discussing his speech, unless you want me to.


there is the case in logic that the jews did the right thing to crucify jesus. it fulfilled the prophecies.  Rather weird logic, but there all the same.
The jewish laws still stand, are binding and relevant, for jews.

thanks for your posting and take care
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: Is Islam inherently violent?
Reply #320 - May 29th, 2008 at 3:03pm
 
Sprintcyclist wrote on May 29th, 2008 at 1:21pm:
helian - thanks for posting that.
If i was the one being killed, it wold not be a concerned that anyone had interperetd or misinterpereted any teachings.
I'ld be more concerned about dying.



Martin luther was a real virulent preacher indeed !! I had not read any of his stuff before. I can't see his logic.

And he is considered the greatest Christian reformer of the last thousand years and look at what that means... a hate filled ranter whose anti-Jewish drivel paved the way for death chambers and ovens in Auschwitz.


One of the great weaknesses of the churches is they have not encouraged people to read the whole bible themselves and come to their own understandings.
It gives one the bigger picture, puts thngs in perspective.
Anyone who had read their own bible would totally disregard this speech.

Would they? You'd trust human nature that much to read a complex text and discern its "true"  meaning? What makes you think individuals would necessarily come to a benign conclusion?


I won't worry about discussing his speech, unless you want me to.

No, that's fine. I'm not interested in deconstructing religious text. In the end its all just unprovable assertions with no criteria for falsification. Either you believe it or you don't.


there is the case in logic that the jews did the right thing to crucify jesus. it fulfilled the prophecies.  Rather weird logic, but there all the same.
The jewish laws still stand, are binding and relevant, for jews.

thanks for your posting and take care

Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.
Re: Is Islam inherently violent?
Reply #321 - May 29th, 2008 at 3:15pm
 
Who considers him the greatest reformer?

Reading the Bible alone may not make people understand it better, but it would it harder for them to be mislead by vested interests, which is the whole point I think.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: Is Islam inherently violent?
Reply #322 - May 29th, 2008 at 3:47pm
 
freediver wrote on May 29th, 2008 at 3:15pm:
Who considers him the greatest reformer?

Have you never heard of the Protestant Reformation? I will leave you to read up on Martin Luther's singular role in reforming Christendom.



Reading the Bible alone may not make people understand it better, but it would it harder for them to be mislead by vested interests, which is the whole point I think.

What about their own vested interests and pet hates?

Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.
Re: Is Islam inherently violent?
Reply #323 - May 29th, 2008 at 3:56pm
 
I think it is far less likely that informed people would seek out validation of their own vested interests in the Bible than ignorant people would be taken advantage of. If you read the whole thing, you will get the main messages. If you don't then you are more likely to believe what someone else tells you is the main message based on a few quotes taken out of context. In addition, it matters far less if a few people get it wrong asnd no-one else does, than it does if one person gets it wrong and is able to convince many others he is right.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: Is Islam inherently violent?
Reply #324 - May 29th, 2008 at 5:18pm
 
freediver wrote on May 29th, 2008 at 3:56pm:
I think it is far less likely that informed people would seek out validation of their own vested interests in the Bible than ignorant people would be taken advantage of. If you read the whole thing, you will get the main messages. If you don't then you are more likely to believe what someone else tells you is the main message based on a few quotes taken out of context. In addition, it matters far less if a few people get it wrong asnd no-one else does, than it does if one person gets it wrong and is able to convince many others he is right.


You are presuming, of course, that bible readers will not form groups and not seek consensus on what they believe to be the meaning of the texts they read. You are then assuming that within these groups there will not be natural leaders and orators who will influence the group's perspective on scriptural reference. If the group is American they may even get TV coverage and become a televangelical denomination... and then it's come on down Benny Hinnn / Creflo Dollar ad nauseam...




Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: Is Islam inherently violent?
Reply #325 - May 29th, 2008 at 6:00pm
 
muso wrote on May 29th, 2008 at 10:35am:
Helian,

I agree with you that the actions of selected self-proclaimed Christians and Muslims in the past have been far from charitable or merciful.

However the vast majority of Christians or Muslims are about as peaceable in nature as the vast majority of atheists.

It's an unreasonable expectation that one group of human beings would be any more peaceful than another group of human beings regardless of creed, because the personal viewpoint of the vast majority is  considerably watered down from the Christianity or Islam of the respective experts (priests or imams).

To say that Muslims are inherently violent is as much a mischaracterisation as saying that Christians or Atheists are inherently violent.  This has certainly not been my experience, and I have travelled quite widely.

Basically it comes down to the fact that we are all human beings.


Sorry, I missed your post till now.

I agree completely. Any text be it Islamic, Christian... (insert belief system here ................) can be manipulated to justify an overwhelming feeling of disdain or contempt for another group... that is a human trait... it's hardly rational that we should believe all we feel and hardly just if we act on every feeling particularly when it is to the detriment of another's well being who has done us no harm.
Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.
Re: Is Islam inherently violent?
Reply #326 - May 29th, 2008 at 6:09pm
 
NorthOfNorth wrote on May 29th, 2008 at 5:18pm:
You are presuming, of course, that bible readers will not form groups and not seek consensus on what they believe to be the meaning of the texts they read. You are then assuming that within these groups there will not be natural leaders and orators who will influence the group's perspective on scriptural reference. If the group is American they may even get TV coverage and become a televangelical denomination... and then it's come on down Benny Hinnn / Creflo Dollar ad nauseam...


Helian all of those things will happen regardless of whether people read the whole thing on their own. The only thing that will change is people's gullibility, which will change for the better.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: Is Islam inherently violent?
Reply #327 - May 29th, 2008 at 7:04pm
 
freediver wrote on May 29th, 2008 at 6:09pm:
NorthOfNorth wrote on May 29th, 2008 at 5:18pm:
You are presuming, of course, that bible readers will not form groups and not seek consensus on what they believe to be the meaning of the texts they read. You are then assuming that within these groups there will not be natural leaders and orators who will influence the group's perspective on scriptural reference. If the group is American they may even get TV coverage and become a televangelical denomination... and then it's come on down Benny Hinnn / Creflo Dollar ad nauseam...


Helian all of those things will happen regardless of whether people read the whole thing on their own. The only thing that will change is people's gullibility, which will change for the better.


Why? The bible has been readable in English for over 400 years, it hasn't made English speaking people less gullible or less capable of misinterpreting the text. In fact its worse than when it was in Latin only.



Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.
Re: Is Islam inherently violent?
Reply #328 - May 29th, 2008 at 7:20pm
 
Are you familiar with the old 'snake oil salesmen' of the US midwest. They would go around selling some crap and claim it was in the Bible.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: Is Islam inherently violent?
Reply #329 - May 29th, 2008 at 7:34pm
 
freediver wrote on May 29th, 2008 at 7:20pm:
Are you familiar with the old 'snake oil salesmen' of the US midwest. They would go around selling some crap and claim it was in the Bible.


And there are whole cities who'd believe him, whether they'd all read the bible themselves or not.


Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 
Send Topic Print