Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 
Send Topic Print
ISLAM [in Australia - from general board] (Read 24322 times)
skeptic
Full Member
***
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 188
Re: Muslim scumbag only gets 1 year.
Reply #45 - Apr 17th, 2007 at 5:09pm
 
ex-member DonaldTrump wrote on Apr 14th, 2007 at 11:01pm:
Give assistance to attempted murder, covering up for the attacker and drug-use = 9 months.


Assault= 11 months




the only thing the police could prove was that he was the driver during the incident and that he was on drugs, they can't prove that he is covering up for the attacker.

and it's funny how u distinguish assault from attempted murder, but the thing is assault causes bodily harm which can lead to death. so technically, assault would be a form of attempted murder.

so 11 months compared to 9 months.
i agree with JJJ, the sentences are pretty much similiar and isn't a case of political correctness.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
AUShole
Full Member
***
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 159
WA
Gender: male
Re: Muslim scumbag only gets 1 year.
Reply #46 - Apr 17th, 2007 at 6:14pm
 
skeptic wrote on Apr 17th, 2007 at 5:09pm:
and it's funny how u distinguish assault from attempted murder, but the thing is assault causes bodily harm which can lead to death. so technically, assault would be a form of attempted murder.


Assault is not a form of attempted murder. To be convicted of murder, it must be proved you formed an INTENT to kill. Attempted murder must have elements of intent and (usually) physicalilty. Absence of physicality is conspiracy to murder.

Aggravated assault / GBH is quite different to murder. There is no intent to kill, only maim. If a person dies as a result of their injuries, it would be manslaughter.

So in this case, without capturing the murderer, or determining motive, the police would be unable to determine the intention of the attacker. Therefore they would have to rule out murder. Effectively, the accomplice has been charged with accessory to aggravated assault (i.e. assisted evasion, not assisting the crime). They should receive a lesser sentence than someone actually carried out an assault. 9 months is less than 11 months, so it seems the sentence is fair.

Regardless of the law, it sounds like from what DT says, the perpetrator is a maniac, and should be locked up indefinitely. I would imagine the coppers are watching him right now, just waiting for him to make a mistake. Morons like this always do.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
ex-member DonaldTrump
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Oh mere mortals, open
your eyes!

Posts: 1995
Overseas
Gender: male
Re: Muslim scumbag only gets 1 year.
Reply #47 - Apr 18th, 2007 at 12:24am
 
Quote:
the only thing the police could prove was that he was the driver during the incident and that he was on drugs, they can't prove that he is covering up for the attacker. 


I didn't realise you were part of the investigation. Any more inside knowledge you can fill us in with?



Quote:
and it's funny how u distinguish assault from attempted murder, but the thing is assault causes bodily harm which can lead to death. so technically, assault would be a form of attempted murder. 


Note: The Australian was using his hands only, did not have fighting training and as far as I know, did not cause serious damage to his victim. That's not 'attempted murder' by any stretch of the imagination.

Note: This Muslim watched as his 'bro' plunged a KNIFE into an Australians back 4 times.


Can you see the difference here?
Back to top
 

Quote:
Tolerance is the virtue of men who no longer believe in anything
&&-- G.K. Chesterton
 
IP Logged
 
skeptic
Full Member
***
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 188
Re: Muslim scumbag only gets 1 year.
Reply #48 - Apr 18th, 2007 at 9:50am
 
Quote:
I didn't realise you were part of the investigation. Any more inside knowledge you can fill us in with?


i can say the same thing about you since u are so adament that this guy knows who the attacker is.

but do u know that covering up a crime or concealing evidence from the police is also a crime? so considering that he wasn't charged with those crimes indicates that the police didn't have any evidence that he knows who the attacker is.

remember to be charged with something, the police need evidence, otherwise ur just wasting the courts time.  

Quote:
Note: The Australian was using his hands only, did not have fighting training and as far as I know, did not cause serious damage to his victim. That's not 'attempted murder' by any stretch of the imagination.

Note: This Muslim watched as his 'bro' plunged a KNIFE into an Australians back 4 times.


my point is u don't need a weapon or specialist fighting training to kill someone, it is possible for an amateur to beat someone to death using his fists.

and just because he didn't cause serious damage to the victim doesn't make it any less of an "attempt". put it this way, using ur logic, then one can argue that the Lebs committed assault since they didn't kill the guy they stabbed.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Apr 18th, 2007 at 2:03pm by skeptic »  
 
IP Logged
 
ex-member DonaldTrump
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Oh mere mortals, open
your eyes!

Posts: 1995
Overseas
Gender: male
Re: Muslim scumbag only gets 1 year.
Reply #49 - Apr 18th, 2007 at 8:29pm
 
Quote:
i can say the same thing about you since u are so adament that this guy knows who the attacker is. 

but do u know that covering up a crime or concealing evidence from the police is also a crime? so considering that he wasn't charged with those crimes indicates that the police didn't have any evidence that he knows who the attacker is. 

remember to be charged with something, the police need evidence, otherwise ur just wasting the courts time. 


I'm just going by what the court and media heard. And it backs up what I'm saying. You on the other hand-- speculating. Therein lies the difference. He was the driver, yes. It helped the attacker get away? Yes. Is the guy covering up for the attacker? Affirmative.

Why do you continue to argue against this point?


Quote:
my point is u don't need a weapon or specialist fighting training to kill someone, it is possible for an amateur to beat someone to death using his fists. 

and just because he didn't cause serious damage to the victim doesn't make it any less of an "attempt". put it this way, using ur logic, then one can argue that the Lebs committed assault since they didn't kill the guy they stabbed.


So you reckon... a guy attacking someone with his fists should get just as heavy sentencing, as someone who stabbed someone 4 times in the back?
Back to top
 

Quote:
Tolerance is the virtue of men who no longer believe in anything
&&-- G.K. Chesterton
 
IP Logged
 
skeptic
Full Member
***
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 188
Re: Muslim scumbag only gets 1 year.
Reply #50 - Apr 19th, 2007 at 9:24am
 
ex-member DonaldTrump wrote on Apr 18th, 2007 at 8:29pm:
I'm just going by what the court and media heard. And it backs up what I'm saying. You on the other hand-- speculating. Therein lies the difference. He was the driver, yes. It helped the attacker get away? Yes. Is the guy covering up for the attacker? Affirmative.


actually, based on what the court was saying they can only prove that he was the getaway driver and that was the crime he was charged with.

u say he covering up for the attacker, well prove it? he claims he was high on drugs and can't remember the incident, do u have evidence that his lying and really knows who did it? and don't bother coming back and saying "well proof he really doesn't know the attacker", since the onus is on the court to prove it, not on him.

like i said before, u need evidence, otherwise ur just wasting the courts time.  

Quote:
So you reckon... a guy attacking someone with his fists should get just as heavy sentencing, as someone who stabbed someone 4 times in the back?


If it involves a death of a person, does the choice of weapon really matter? No, u need to look at the intention of the attacker, i.e. did he intent to kill or just cause bodily harm.

and in this case, the Leb guy wasn't the attacker anyway, he was just the driver.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Apr 19th, 2007 at 11:16am by skeptic »  
 
IP Logged
 
keithy
Full Member
***
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 106
Osama Bin Laden
Reply #51 - Sep 8th, 2007 at 10:39am
 
Does he have anything to say?

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 40662
Gender: male
Re: Osama Bin Laden
Reply #52 - Sep 8th, 2007 at 1:01pm
 
He has. he can say he is a muslim who follows the koran correctly.
Check with hilali, they are in complete agreeance.
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
DILLIGAF
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1259
The greens are red
Gender: male
Re: Osama Bin Laden
Reply #53 - Sep 11th, 2007 at 1:07am
 
I reckon he's dead.
Back to top
 

Total anti-marxist and anti-left wing. The Right is Right.&&&&&&
 
IP Logged
 
Progs
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 68
Port Stephens, NSW
Gender: male
Re: Osama Bin Laden
Reply #54 - Sep 11th, 2007 at 1:17am
 
If I believed in evil, then Binnie would be no.1 on my list.

AusNat - he ain't dead. Death is to good for the likes of him...
Back to top
 

An Aussie for Progressive Progressivness.
 
IP Logged
 
DILLIGAF
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1259
The greens are red
Gender: male
Re: Osama Bin Laden
Reply #55 - Sep 11th, 2007 at 1:52am
 
Progs wrote on Sep 11th, 2007 at 1:17am:
If I believed in evil, then Binnie would be no.1 on my list.


I'd say either Ariel Sharon or Ben Yehuda.
Back to top
 

Total anti-marxist and anti-left wing. The Right is Right.&&&&&&
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48830
At my desk.
Islamic council steals from refugees
Reply #56 - Nov 2nd, 2007 at 12:32pm
 
Islamic council stripped of housing control

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22688983-5006784,00.html

A POWERFUL Islamic organisation has been stripped of its community housing after being caught placing friends in state-owned properties intended for refugees.

An independent audit commissioned by the NSW Housing Department found the NSW Islamic Council, which manages 10 government-owned units in Sydney's southwest, had mismanaged the properties and breached its leasing agreement.

The inquiry into the NSW Islamic Council was sparked in August after The Australian revealed the body's vice-president, Ali Roude, let a two-bedroom flat in Belmore to Muslim community radio broadcaster Abraham Zoabi, who did not qualify for public housing.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 40662
Gender: male
Re: Islamic council steals from refugees
Reply #57 - Nov 2nd, 2007 at 12:40pm
 
Whatever are we doing giving free housing to islamics ??

Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48830
At my desk.
Re: Islamic council steals from refugees
Reply #58 - Nov 2nd, 2007 at 12:56pm
 
They are for refugees sprint, regardless of religion. From the article:

...the NSW Islamic Council, which manages 10 government-owned units

The Housing Department owns and manages public housing.

It also delegates the management of 13,000 community houses to non-government and not-for-profit organisations such as the Islamic Council.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 40662
Gender: male
Re: Islamic council steals from refugees
Reply #59 - Nov 2nd, 2007 at 2:57pm
 
If its run by the islamic council, it is only and entirely about religion.

must keep in mind the banning of even bibles in saudi arabia.
Think they would give a christian council free housing ??

Whever are we encouraging them here ?
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 
Send Topic Print