Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Poll Poll
Question: Aussie converts- What to do.



« Last Modified by: DILLIGAF on: Mar 22nd, 2007 at 6:21pm »

Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 
Send Topic Print
The Great Muslim Debate (Read 46054 times)
ex-member DonaldTrump
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Oh mere mortals, open
your eyes!

Posts: 1995
Overseas
Gender: male
Re: The Great Muslim Debate
Reply #150 - Apr 29th, 2007 at 2:54am
 
Tada! Exhibit A. -More ideological jibbering from our favourite politically correct fascist, Zoso.

Quote:
Interesting trump, last I checked I had put up two posts regarding the purpose of multiculturalism to which you could come up with no reply.


Firstly, I never conceded defeat in those threads, I just noted that your points were going around in circles and nothing new was being said by you. Hence, I stopped posting.


Quote:
Our economy requires that we receive immigrants... right, you with me still?


Take note of this... it's a key point.

Multiculturalism DOES NOT NECESSARILY EQUAL IMMIGRANTS.


Quote:
We NEED them, we need the skills because we don't have enough skilled labour.


Okay. Provide some stats or some kind of link that we have a 'skills shortage.' The Muslim immigrants we've been importing from Sudan in Victoria (Not to mention the ones imported into Tamworth) have little to no skills apart from trolley pushing. Is that the kid of 'skills' you're referring to?


Quote:
Ok right, now once they are here in our society, they are free to express their faith and their culture.


Pfft. It doesn't necessarily have to be this way. It can be changed easily with a referendum. It's not the be all and end all of society.


Quote:
It is a part of our society, if you believe in Australia then you believe in the freedoms it represents, right?


Since when is it part of 'our society?' Since 1970? What about the other 170 years of our nations history? And as far as I know, there's no bill of rights that says we have 'freedom of speech' and 'freedom of religion.'


Quote:
To go out and restrict the behaviour of subgroups based on their ethnic background, while the rest of us are free to do what we want, that is ASKING FOR TROUBLE.


And what about when tampering with these ethnic subgroups are a REACTION to trouble?  Huh


Quote:
Do you WANT to pick a fight and create tension? Or would you rather accept that economically we are dependant on immigration, and therefore multiculturalism is a requirement for a civil and free society.


No... I do NOT except this. In fact, I reject your backward point of view altogether. Immigration and multiculturalism do not necessarily need to go together. If we'd just accept immigrants from countries with similar cultures to our own, with GENUINE skills, and not as much emphasis on KEEPING their cultures (Trust me, people like this DO exist), then we'd be okay. Importing immigrants from Africa and the Middle East is just asking for trouble.


Quote:
Find a way to end our dependence on immigration and you might have a leg to stand on.


Whatever. Perhaps increase our own population? Immigration isn't a permanent solution, it's a temporary solution.


Quote:
Simply allowing ethnic groups to wear the clothes they want to wear and eat the food they want to eat is not an assault on our culture.


Oh gee. How fine and dandy.
Tra la la la la la.

You make it sound SOOOO innocent and straight forward when in fact, it isn't that simple.

How's about when Muslim women don't want to show their faces for driving licences? What about when Muslims don't want their girls to wear the traditional school uniform? What about when Muslims demand air conditioners in schools during summer when their girls are getting too hot fro their Muslim gear? What about when particular Muslims protest at schools and hostpitals when pork is served to them like it's served to everyone and demand individual preferences? The list goes on, pal. These 'innocent' things yours is more troublesome than you think.


Quote:
If you do see assaults on our culture, speak up about it, like your little butcher example. Have you actually been down to your butcher and told him what you think of his policy yet? Rallied a few friends in the neighbourhood to do the same? Because if you haven't I'd hazard at a guess you are simply a whining little b!tch...


What makes you think I haven't?


Quote:
As for the danger posed by muslims, I agree, we do not need to discuss that any further,but I shall just let history demonstrate who is right... see you in 20 years chump.


Right... I hope your daughter is raped by a Muslim immigrant in that short space of time.


Quote:
Come on sprint, how many wars have been fought between extremist christian groups? A helluva lot!


Oh yeah? NAME THEM.


Back to top
 

Quote:
Tolerance is the virtue of men who no longer believe in anything
&&-- G.K. Chesterton
 
IP Logged
 
zoso
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 512
Re: The Great Muslim Debate
Reply #151 - Apr 29th, 2007 at 2:12pm
 
Sprintcyclist wrote on Apr 29th, 2007 at 12:42am:
I am not sure if there has been a christian group that has just waged terrorist activities against everyone else ? 
There was a christian based terrorist group recently in usa that was reported in by other christians.

Terrorism is a tactic of war, usually it is called guerilla warfare. The deliberate targeting of civilians is not a wholly owned subsidiary of 'terrorist' tactics either, so that line of reasoning has no merit.

Quote:
None of these extremist actions are supported by The Bible.

having a violent leader/book to follow sure does justify and promote  violent and over the to people

and I don't believe suicide and the murdering of muslims that do not agree with suicide or terror tactics is condoned by the Koran...

Quote:
Our economy requires that we receive immigrants... right, you with me still?

No it doesn't.

It is not about wages, nothing to do with wages at all, we have a serious skills shortage... in case you have missed the headlines for the past several years... Our government is somewhat opposed to uncontrolled immigration, the pacific solution shows this, and yet pragmatically they continue to allow immigrants in on skilled work visas...why do you think that might be?
Back to top
« Last Edit: Apr 29th, 2007 at 2:25pm by zoso »  
 
IP Logged
 
zoso
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 512
Re: The Great Muslim Debate
Reply #152 - Apr 29th, 2007 at 2:24pm
 
ex-member DonaldTrump wrote on Apr 29th, 2007 at 2:54am:
Multiculturalism DOES NOT NECESSARILY EQUAL IMMIGRANTS.


I never suggested it did...there is some subtlety to my argument you seem to be missing...

Quote:
Okay. Provide some stats or some kind of link that we have a 'skills shortage.' The Muslim immigrants we've been importing from Sudan in Victoria (Not to mention the ones imported into Tamworth) have little to no skills apart from trolley pushing. Is that the kid of 'skills' you're referring to?

Please...you need proof that the skills shortage is real?

There are other purposes to immigration, such as satisfying our legal requirements under UN charter, I think you are confusing refugees with skilled migrants, but either way the main point stands.


Quote:
Quote:
Ok right, now once they are here in our society, they are free to express their faith and their culture.


Pfft. It doesn't necessarily have to be this way. It can be changed easily with a referendum. It's not the be all and end all of society.

You WANT to live in a society that doesn't allow freedom of dress and religious expression? I have a beard, I like my beard, if I want to put on a turban and cook Indian or Arabic food it is my prerogative, if my girlfriend wants to wear a veil in public that is her prerogative, if she wants to put a dot on her head and do a silly dance or even read lines of the Koran in some public place she is allowed to. Separating out sections of the population and denying them these rights has been the cause of any number of dangerous conflict situations in history. You are effectively condoning an apartheid system...you think that is representative of Australian values?

Protectionism is death, cultures will always change. Globalisation is the unstoppable future, all I can say is it must suck to be you when you have to face these realities every day...

Quote:
Quote:
It is a part of our society, if you believe in Australia then you believe in the freedoms it represents, right?


Since when is it part of 'our society?' Since 1970? What about the other 170 years of our nations history? And as far as I know, there's no bill of rights that says we have 'freedom of speech' and 'freedom of religion.'

Since federation. We may not have a bill of rights but you will find that the constitution and federal law provide all the protection of freedom that is necessary.

Quote:
Quote:
To go out and restrict the behaviour of subgroups based on their ethnic background, while the rest of us are free to do what we want, that is ASKING FOR TROUBLE.


And what about when tampering with these ethnic subgroups are a REACTION to trouble?  Huh

What trouble? Do you have any examples? Ones that are not just examples of petty crime committed by people who look a little different to you?

Quote:
No... I do NOT except this. In fact, I reject your backward point of view altogether. Immigration and multiculturalism do not necessarily need to go together. If we'd just accept immigrants from countries with similar cultures to our own, with GENUINE skills, and not as much emphasis on KEEPING their cultures (Trust me, people like this DO exist), then we'd be okay. Importing immigrants from Africa and the Middle East is just asking for trouble.

There is a population decline in almost all countries with 'similar cultures to our own'. There is no immigration to be had from these places.

Quote:
Quote:
Find a way to end our dependence on immigration and you might have a leg to stand on.


Whatever. Perhaps increase our own population? Immigration isn't a permanent solution, it's a temporary solution.

Ok...so how does that solve the short term problem? Or the long term problem for that matter? Immigration has been a permenant solution for the entirety of our history...what makes you think this will change?

Quote:
Oh gee. How fine and dandy.
Tra la la la la la.

You make it sound SOOOO innocent and straight forward when in fact, it isn't that simple.

How's about when Muslim women don't want to show their faces for driving licences? What about when Muslims don't want their girls to wear the traditional school uniform? What about when Muslims demand air conditioners in schools during summer when their girls are getting too hot fro their Muslim gear? What about when particular Muslims protest at schools and hostpitals when pork is served to them like it's served to everyone and demand individual preferences? The list goes on, pal. These 'innocent' things yours is more troublesome than you think.

I said multiple times that I disagree with allowing any of this...are you sure you are keeping up?


Quote:
What makes you think I haven't?

Have you? Have you tried to rally some others to the cause?

Quote:
Right... I hope your daughter is raped by a Muslim immigrant in that short space of time.

Wow, you really seem to be representing a wonderful culture that deserves to be preserved...

Quote:
Oh yeah? NAME THEM.

The French, Irish, and English civil wars, and the crusades...to name a few.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Apr 29th, 2007 at 2:33pm by zoso »  
 
IP Logged
 
zoso
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 512
Re: The Great Muslim Debate
Reply #153 - Apr 29th, 2007 at 2:40pm
 
Oh and by the way chump, the definition of bigot:

Quote:
a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion.


Doesn't quite fit the argument I am putting forth.

And fascism:

Quote:
a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.


Is quite the opposite of what I am arguing.

I'll just leave it up to the reader to decide which one of us best fits the definition of these words.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.
Re: The Great Muslim Debate
Reply #154 - Apr 29th, 2007 at 6:53pm
 
A thread on multiculturalism: http://ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1177288133

I think that attacking multiculturalism as a way to get at muslims is a bit absurd. Even if it does have it's problems, history has consistently shown that the alternative is not just wrong, but evil.

Pfft. It doesn't necessarily have to be this way. It can be changed easily with a referendum. It's not the be all and end all of society.  

Yes it is. Fortunately such a referendum would stand zero chance of passing.

And as far as I know, there's no bill of rights that says we have 'freedom of speech' and 'freedom of religion.'  

I don't think anyone would seriously try to take them off us. And besides, a piece of paper cannot protect your freedoms - something the Americans are having a tough time learning. A functioning democracy is what protects your freedoms, with or without a constitution explicitly protecting them. In my experience deference to a constitution is an excuse to avoid really thinking about an issue.

And what about when tampering with these ethnic subgroups are a REACTION to trouble?

You have a downwards spiral. Fortunately cooler heads usually prevail.

Right... I hope your daughter is raped by a Muslim immigrant in that short space of time.

Come on DT, there's no need for that sort of thing.

Zoso I will start a new thread on the skills shortage/wages issue: http://ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1177837250/0
Back to top
« Last Edit: Apr 29th, 2007 at 7:01pm by freediver »  

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.
'Mickey Mouse' preaches Muslim fight
Reply #155 - May 9th, 2007 at 4:24pm
 
http://www.smh.com.au/news/World/Mickey-Mouse-preaches-Muslim-fight/2007/05/09/1178390368076.html

Hamas militants have enlisted the iconic Mickey Mouse to broadcast their message of Islamic dominion and armed resistance to their most impressionable audience - little kids.

A giant black-and-white rodent - named "Farfour," or "butterfly," but unmistakably a Mickey ripoff - does his high-pitched preaching against the US and Israel on a children's show run each Friday on Al-Aqsa TV, a station run by Hamas. The militant group, sworn to Israel's destruction, shares power in the Palestinian government.

"You and I are laying the foundation for a world led by Islamists," Farfour squeaked on a recent episode of the show, which is titled, Tomorrow's Pioneers.

Israel has long complained that the Palestinian airwaves are filled with incitement.

An Israeli organisation that monitors Palestinian media, Palestinian Media Watch, said the Mickey Mouse lookalike takes "every opportunity to indoctrinate young viewers with teachings of Islamic supremacy, hatred of Israel and the US, and support of 'resistance,' the Palestinian euphemism for terror."

The television station would not comment.

A Gaza-based psychologist said the program proved that the culture of glorifying violence had penetrated Palestinian society.

"It's the fault of both (Israel and the Palestinians)," said Samir Zakkout, from the Gaza Community Mental Health Program.

"If Palestinians had peace, children wouldn't learn violence."

Children have been traumatized by bloodshed in the course of Israeli attacks and Palestinian infighting, he said.

"There's been a collapse of values," he said. "If I can kill my enemy, I can kill my brother."



Somali forces 'burn Muslim's veils'

http://www.smh.com.au/news/World/Somali-forces-burn-Muslims-veils/2007/05/09/1178390387541.html

Somali security forces are seizing and even burning Muslim women's veils to stop Islamist insurgents from disguising themselves for attacks, authorities and witnesses said.

The crackdown on veils is a highly symbolic turnaround for Mogadishu after Islamist leaders, who controlled the city in the second half of 2006, had instructed women to wear them.

"Every policeman and government soldier has orders to confiscate veils from veiled women," senior police officer Ali Nur told Reuters in Mogadishu, saying various recent attacks had been carried out by people in disguise.

"Some of the remnants of the Islamic Courts have been caught wearing veils. During the war, these remnants, pretending to be women, killed so many government troops."

Somalis are generally moderate Muslims, and most women traditionally cover their heads but not faces. Officials say some suicide attacks have been carried out by men disguised under full face-veils.

Backed by Ethiopia's military, Somali government forces kicked the Islamists out of Mogadishu over the New Year. They have been facing an insurgency since then that has killed at least 1,300 people since February.



Absorbing Muslims tackles radicalism: PM

http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/Absorbing-Muslims-tackles-radicalism-PM/2007/05/11/1178390516282.html

Prime Minister John Howard says assimilating new citizens into the Australian community helps tackle the problems of radicalism among a minority of Muslims.

In Tuesday's budget, Treasurer Peter Costello allocated $461,000 to programs that help Muslim communities integrate into the wider Australian community.

"I think it's in the interests of everybody," Mr Howard told Southern Cross Broadcasting.

"There's every reason to try and assimilate - and I unapologetically use that word 'assimilate' - a section of the community, a tiny minority of whose members have caused concern.
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 11th, 2007 at 11:44am by freediver »  

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.
Re: The Great Muslim Debate
Reply #156 - May 14th, 2007 at 11:48am
 
http://www.msauq.org/?content=events&eventID=20

TERRORISM,

WOMEN

and ISLAM


“UNVEILING THE MYSTERIES…”


MSAUQ Presents


A lecture by


Halim Rane
(PhD Scholar in Islamic Studies)


Wednesday 16 May 2007 at 4PM


Building 24, Room S402


Light refreshments will be provided


Presented by MSAUQ (www.msauq.org)



http://www.polsis.uq.edu.au/index.html?page=57197

The broad purpose of this paper is to explore the question of 'how do we 'deal' with Other?" While there has been considerable work done around this topic generally, I focus specifically on how the ‘construction’ of group identity can affect and inform responses to that question. Overall, I argue that group identity constructions can matter greatly to decisions and justifications concerning recourse to violence. The paper takes the Basque political violence in Spain to illustrate, firstly, that conflict can be based principally about protection of group identity. Moreover, it reveals that Basque leaders constructed ‘Basqueness’ in order to pursue political goals which required conflict, and thus not only can identity constructions be grounded in political motives, they can contribute to violent recourse. I argue that a pivotal moment is when actors inject threat into identity difference discursively; the importance of this moment however is largely overlooked by mainstream analyses. The second part of the exploration is purely experimental. I ask if useful parallels can be made between International Relations theory and approaches to constructing group identity. For instance, in the case of the political violence in Spain, both the Basque and Spanish identity constructions were based in what could be described as a 'realist' paradigm, whereby identity notions were both positivist and generally intolerant of Other ways of living the ‘good life’. Native American constructions, on the other hand, come at identity alterity from a largely post-modern perspective which recognises a plurality of truths and the virtue of permitting multiple notions of the good life. In the case of the former, conflict between identities is enabled by the manner of the constructions; yet in the latter, recourse to violence against Other is constrained.

http://www.polsis.uq.edu.au/index.html?page=57171



Islamist extremists starved of donations

http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/Islamist-extremists-starved-of-donations/2007/05/16/1178995188873.html

The flow of international funds to Islamic extremists in Australia has been slashed by 80 per cent thanks to an agreement with the Saudi Arabian government.
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 16th, 2007 at 10:20am by freediver »  

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
gogerthat
New Member
*
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1
Gender: male
Re: The Great Muslim Debate
Reply #157 - Jul 31st, 2016 at 11:43am
 
Religions, not one scrap of proof that there is any god, there used to be gods for everything. sun moon gods etc,
gods were invented to give answers to our evolving brains
for the inexplicable, comets other stuff in the night sky, earth was the center of the universe and flat, Darwin, Einstein and science challenges religion, hell they were
burning witches up to 500 years ago.
What matters is here and now.
Gutless muslims  killing innocent people almost every day,
(not all I know) is buggered. move on and get with it.
No more immigration of these type until this mob sorts them selves out. not all muslims are terrorists but most terrorists are muslim.
Finally coalition should get out of the middle east, I pitty there women who don't get treated fairly though.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 74257
Gender: male
Re: The Great Muslim Debate
Reply #158 - Jul 31st, 2016 at 11:44am
 
freediver wrote on Mar 21st, 2007 at 5:56pm:
What we need to do is stop alienating the entire muslim community and work with them towards the goals we have in common. The more we tar them all with the same brush, the more we push weaker individuals towards extremism.


Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked

Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked


I'm in shock ... is this really from FD?
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21612
A cat with a view
Re: The Great Muslim Debate
Reply #159 - Jul 31st, 2016 at 12:24pm
 
John Smith wrote on Jul 31st, 2016 at 11:44am:
freediver wrote on Mar 21st, 2007 at 5:56pm:
What we need to do is stop alienating the entire muslim community and work with them towards the goals we have in common. The more we tar them all with the same brush, the more we push weaker individuals towards extremism.


Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked

Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked


I'm in shock ... is this really from FD?



John_Smith,

What is so strange ?

Post 9/11 many people in the West considered ISLAM to be simply another typical/traditional religion.

And they actually knew very little, about that faith known as, 'ISLAM'.

Maybe FD was in that 'boat' too ?



But in the intervening years, some people have chosen to try educate and inform themselves about what ISLAM is, and about what 'traditional' [i.e. mainstream] ISLAM does promote in the world.

And perhaps the change in their opinion about ISLAM, reflects that effort, to educate and inform themselves more, about what ISLAM is.


Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: The Great Muslim Debate
Reply #160 - Jul 31st, 2016 at 12:26pm
 
John Smith wrote on Jul 31st, 2016 at 11:44am:
freediver wrote on Mar 21st, 2007 at 5:56pm:
What we need to do is stop alienating the entire muslim community and work with them towards the goals we have in common. The more we tar them all with the same brush, the more we push weaker individuals towards extremism.


Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked

Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked


I'm in shock ... is this really from FD?


FD has awoken John. FD used to be a spineless apologist:

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1379233325/711#711
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 74257
Gender: male
Re: The Great Muslim Debate
Reply #161 - Jul 31st, 2016 at 3:37pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Jul 31st, 2016 at 12:26pm:
John Smith wrote on Jul 31st, 2016 at 11:44am:
freediver wrote on Mar 21st, 2007 at 5:56pm:
What we need to do is stop alienating the entire muslim community and work with them towards the goals we have in common. The more we tar them all with the same brush, the more we push weaker individuals towards extremism.


Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked

Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked


I'm in shock ... is this really from FD?


FD has awoken John. FD used to be a spineless apologist:

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1379233325/711#711


What happened to cause the complete flip? Did some Arab steal his wife or something?
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Baronvonrort
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 18312
Gender: male
Re: The Great Muslim Debate
Reply #162 - Jul 31st, 2016 at 4:33pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Jul 31st, 2016 at 12:26pm:
John Smith wrote on Jul 31st, 2016 at 11:44am:
freediver wrote on Mar 21st, 2007 at 5:56pm:
What we need to do is stop alienating the entire muslim community and work with them towards the goals we have in common. The more we tar them all with the same brush, the more we push weaker individuals towards extremism.


Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked

Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked


I'm in shock ... is this really from FD?


FD has awoken John. FD used to be a spineless apologist:

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1379233325/711#711



It's common for apologists to become fierce critics of Islam when they become enlightened about Islam.

Abu ,Falah and Lestat would have helped educate FD on the idiocy he was defending. Wink
Back to top
 

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: The Great Muslim Debate
Reply #163 - Jul 31st, 2016 at 5:07pm
 
John Smith wrote on Jul 31st, 2016 at 3:37pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Jul 31st, 2016 at 12:26pm:
John Smith wrote on Jul 31st, 2016 at 11:44am:
freediver wrote on Mar 21st, 2007 at 5:56pm:
What we need to do is stop alienating the entire muslim community and work with them towards the goals we have in common. The more we tar them all with the same brush, the more we push weaker individuals towards extremism.


Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked

Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked


I'm in shock ... is this really from FD?


FD has awoken John. FD used to be a spineless apologist:

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1379233325/711#711


What happened to cause the complete flip? Did some Arab steal his wife or something?


He started talking to Abu.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 74257
Gender: male
Re: The Great Muslim Debate
Reply #164 - Jul 31st, 2016 at 5:08pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Jul 31st, 2016 at 5:07pm:
John Smith wrote on Jul 31st, 2016 at 3:37pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Jul 31st, 2016 at 12:26pm:
John Smith wrote on Jul 31st, 2016 at 11:44am:
freediver wrote on Mar 21st, 2007 at 5:56pm:
What we need to do is stop alienating the entire muslim community and work with them towards the goals we have in common. The more we tar them all with the same brush, the more we push weaker individuals towards extremism.


Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked

Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked


I'm in shock ... is this really from FD?


FD has awoken John. FD used to be a spineless apologist:

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1379233325/711#711


What happened to cause the complete flip? Did some Arab steal his wife or something?


He started talking to Abu.



ahh ... that name keeps popping up for some reason
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 
Send Topic Print