freediver wrote on Dec 24
th, 2009 at 10:14pm:
So you can't explain how science is based on Aristotle's syllogism?
The whole mathematics is based on:
1. A cripple syllogism or axiom because of only one statement and one conclusion:
If a=b (statement)
then b=a (conclusion)
2. Full syllogism:
If a=b (statement 1)
If b=c (Statement 2)
Then a=c (Conclusion)
Before introduction of zero Mathematics was just an accounting.
With zero mathematics was lifted on level of Philosophy
First concept of zero was introduced by Indian Philosophers thousand years ago before adopted in Middle East and then much later brought to Europe by students who studded at Medina University. Once when you have zero you have to deal with infinity and then philosophically (not mathematically) ask yourself what is nothing and what is everything and so on and so on.
The point here is that Indian philosophers didn’t use western rational way of thinking or syllogism to come up with such genius thing they applied intuition, inspiration, spiritual intelligence and all other human capacities, unrecognized by the West.
It’s nothing new, thousand years ago India had similar rationalist and skeptic philosophers (like for example Charvaca) who were scorned both by Hindu and Buddhist philosophers as the lowest of the low.
To study western knowledge you can just go to the library grab the book regardless of spiritual state of your soul and mind. You cold be overweight, greedy, liar, immoral it does not matter all of this can be rationally justified as Dostoyevski’s Grand Inquisitor (”Brothers Karamazov”) did. On the other hand t study eastern wisdom by initiating intuition and inspiration you also have to perform meditation, fasting and so on. Because of this it is very difficult and unnecessary to distinguish eastern philosophy and science from religion.
The problem is that West took for granted and copied ancient Greek science without developing own fundamental and original approach which anyway would be considered as a waste of time in capitalist environment.
Some of the great scientists like Nikola Tesla were aware about limitations of strictly rational western way of thinking that unnecessary slow human progress.
He was not burned like Giordano Bruno but pronounced as extremely odd and eccentric by dogmatic western scientific establishment.