Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Should our cricketers boycott Zimbabwe? (Read 6006 times)
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48862
At my desk.
Should our cricketers boycott Zimbabwe?
May 8th, 2007 at 11:01am
 
The federal government has offered to cover the cost of a fine for not playing, which could be up to $2m.

http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/Zimbabwe-boycott-may-be-needed-Robinson/2007/05/08/1178390239092.html

A sporting boycott may be the only way to stop the human rights travesty occurring in Zimbabwe, former Irish president Mary Robinson says.

And she believes the havoc being wrought by the brutal regime of Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe is akin to what happened in South Africa under apartheid.

Foreign Minister Alexander Downer will meet with Cricket Australia this week to convince them to withdraw the Australian team from a tour of Zimbabwe in September.

The federal government is worried that a tour of the troubled African nation by the Australian cricketers would be a propaganda victory for President Mugabe.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
ex-member DonaldTrump
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Oh mere mortals, open
your eyes!

Posts: 1995
Overseas
Gender: male
Re: Should our cricketers boycott Zimbabwe?
Reply #1 - May 8th, 2007 at 6:35pm
 
To put it simply... no.

Complete waste of Australian taxpayers money.

$2 million to call off the tour? Bugger that. -As if that would achieve anything anyway.
Back to top
 

Quote:
Tolerance is the virtue of men who no longer believe in anything
&&-- G.K. Chesterton
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48862
At my desk.
Re: Should our cricketers boycott Zimbabwe?
Reply #2 - May 8th, 2007 at 7:00pm
 
It helped with South Africa.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
ex-member DonaldTrump
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Oh mere mortals, open
your eyes!

Posts: 1995
Overseas
Gender: male
Re: Should our cricketers boycott Zimbabwe?
Reply #3 - May 8th, 2007 at 7:29pm
 
Quote:
It helped with South Africa.


Completely different thing, freediver.
Back to top
 

Quote:
Tolerance is the virtue of men who no longer believe in anything
&&-- G.K. Chesterton
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48862
At my desk.
Re: Should our cricketers boycott Zimbabwe?
Reply #4 - May 8th, 2007 at 7:34pm
 
Because then it was white people doing it, now it's black people?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
ex-member DonaldTrump
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Oh mere mortals, open
your eyes!

Posts: 1995
Overseas
Gender: male
Re: Should our cricketers boycott Zimbabwe?
Reply #5 - May 8th, 2007 at 7:56pm
 
Quote:
Because then it was white people doing it, now it's black people?


In the politically correct age we live in... black racism counts for nothing. Society only sees white people as 'racist.' I'm convinced of this.

Furthermore, the South African England tour sparked the 20 year boycott, because the South African Government woudn't allow one of its former citizens who played for the English team, a half-black South African player, to play against South Africa. This sparked the boycott.

In addition, it was the TOTAL boycott by all teams of South Africa which made the impact, not just ONE team.

Finally, the boycott had little to no effect on the decision making of the South African Government. It was only a cricket game, after all. They continued this Government for another 20 years... despite the boycott. So the boycott by the Australians would be meaningless.
Back to top
 

Quote:
Tolerance is the virtue of men who no longer believe in anything
&&-- G.K. Chesterton
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48862
At my desk.
Re: Should our cricketers boycott Zimbabwe?
Reply #6 - May 8th, 2007 at 8:01pm
 
In addition, it was the TOTAL boycott by all teams of South Africa which made the impact, not just ONE team.

Someone has to make the first move.

It was only a cricket game, after all. They continued this Government for another 20 years... despite the boycott. So the boycott by the Australians would be meaningless.

What better way to raise awareness and build momentum behind a global movement than a sporting boycott?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 40717
Gender: male
Re: Should our cricketers boycott Zimbabwe?
Reply #7 - May 9th, 2007 at 9:57am
 
Yes, boycott them.  The oppressed people there are astonished that they have such a hard tiome, and other countries send teams over to play a game. Effectively supporting Mugabe.

ACB should have never agreed to go there. It is also dangerous to the players. The (gutless) ICB should not organise anything there.

Take the moral stand.  Anything less is immoral.
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
ex-member DonaldTrump
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Oh mere mortals, open
your eyes!

Posts: 1995
Overseas
Gender: male
Re: Should our cricketers boycott Zimbabwe?
Reply #8 - May 10th, 2007 at 1:32am
 
freediver wrote on May 8th, 2007 at 8:01pm:
What better way to raise awareness and build momentum behind a global movement than a sporting boycott?


Surely you're not serious with that statement, freediver.
Back to top
 

Quote:
Tolerance is the virtue of men who no longer believe in anything
&&-- G.K. Chesterton
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48862
At my desk.
Mugabe could pocket $2m if tour scrapped
Reply #9 - May 10th, 2007 at 4:03pm
 
Why wouldn't I be serious?

http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/Mugabe-could-pocket-2m-if-tour-scrapped/2007/05/10/1178390436404.html

Zimbabwean dictator Robert Mugabe could end up pocketing a $US2 million ($A2.4 million) fine if Australia's cricket tour of Zimbabwe is scrapped, Foreign Minister Alexander Downer has conceded.

"What we can do is try to persuade Cricket Australia that sending the world's greatest cricket team - not just any cricket team but the world's greatest cricket team - to Zimbabwe will be seen as a propaganda victory by the Mugabe regime," he said.

"(It) will be able to make the argument that sure, a lot of the world wants to isolate us but look, we have the world's greatest cricket team right here in our own country playing against our national team.

"So inadvertently our cricketers would be providing some comfort to a pretty barbaric dictatorship."

Former Wallaby Anthony Abrahams has joined calls for the tour to be cancelled.

Mr Abrahams, who led a seven-player boycott of the disastrous Springbok rugby union tour of 1971, said Australia would be compromised if the tour went ahead because of Mugabe's "blatant denial of human rights".
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
ex-member DonaldTrump
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Oh mere mortals, open
your eyes!

Posts: 1995
Overseas
Gender: male
Re: Should our cricketers boycott Zimbabwe?
Reply #10 - May 12th, 2007 at 1:39am
 
It will achieve nothing, freediver.
Back to top
 

Quote:
Tolerance is the virtue of men who no longer believe in anything
&&-- G.K. Chesterton
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48862
At my desk.
Re: Should our cricketers boycott Zimbabwe?
Reply #11 - May 12th, 2007 at 11:17am
 
Alone it will acieve little. As part of a broader movement it can move mountains. Just like it did for South Africa.



Zimbabwe clash may go ahead despite ban

http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/Zimbabwe-clash-may-go-ahead-despite-ban/2007/05/13/1178994971240.html

Australia and Zimbabwe could play their scheduled cricket series at a neutral venue, despite the federal government banning the tour to avert a propaganda coup for Robert Mugabe's regime.

Prime Minister John Howard on Sunday announced the federal government had ordered Cricket Australia (CA) not to proceed with the planned September tour of Zimbabwe for a series of one-day games.

He said it wasn't fair to leave it up to young sportsmen to decide whether to participate.

As a great fan of the game, Mr Howard admitted the decision pained him.

CA accepted the decision but said it would work with the government in the hope of playing the Zimbabwe games at a neutral venue.

A likely spot for any neutral-venue clash could be South Africa, where the inaugural Twenty20 World Cup will be held later this year.

But Mr Howard said he feared this option could expose Zimbabwean cricketers to persecution in their home country, as they could be seen to be supporting enemies of President Mugabe.

Foreign Minister Alexander Downer expressed reservations about playing against Zimbabwe at all, even on neutral territory.

"I think it's best not to play against Zimbabwe for the time being if that can be avoided," he said.

"I don't think (a neutral clash) is very likely to happen as I doubt very much the Zimbabwe Cricket Union, or for that matter the Zimbabwe government, which no doubt runs the Zimbabwe Cricket Union, would allow Zimbabwe to be humiliated to the extent they accept that the international community refuses to come to their country."

CA said the government ban meant it was not liable under International Cricket Council (ICC) rules for a $A2.4 million compensation payment to Zimbabwe.

Australian captain Ricky Ponting said he was comfortable with the government ban.

Labor said the ban was the most appropriate course of action.

Zimbabwe's ambassador to Australia was not available for comment.

ICC hopes for neutral venue

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2007/05/13/1178994972608.html

http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/ICC-wants-game-on-neutral-ground/2007/05/13/1178994997930.html



NZ backs Australian ban on Zimbabwe tour

http://www.smh.com.au/news/World/NZ-backs-Australian-ban-on-Zimbabwe-tour/2007/05/14/1178995038349.html

The New Zealand government has backed Australia's decision to stop a scheduled cricket tour of Zimbabwe.

A spokesman for New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters praised Prime Minister John Howard's decision.

"If Australia's decision puts more pressure on the ICC (International Cricket Council) to show some leadership themselves ... then that is great," the spokesman said.

"We have believed for some time that it shouldn't be left up to individual governments or national cricket bodies.

"The ICC should recognise the problem with Zimbabwe and remove them from the international calendar."



African groups praise PM's cricket ban

http://www.smh.com.au/news/World/African-groups-praise-PMs-cricket-ban/2007/05/13/1178995000984.html

African human rights organisations have hailed Prime Minister John Howard's decision to ban Australia's one-day cricket team from touring the African nation.

Newspapers and radio stations in Africa broadcast Howard's announcement that the government would block the Australian team's Zimbabwe tour to avoid "an enormous propaganda boost to the Mugabe regime".

Pascal Mabali, coordinator of the DRC Human Rights Initiative, a non-governmental organisation based in Democratic Republic of Congo, said Howard's stance was right and should be emulated by all leaders, especially those of developed countries.



Australia avoids Indian ire over boycott

http://www.smh.com.au/news/Sport/Australia-avoids-Indian-ire-over-boycott/2007/05/14/1178995083745.html

Cricket Australia (CA) appears to have avoided a backlash from India over the boycotted Zimbabwe tour.

Australia's scrapping of the tour, although enforced by the federal government, had prompted concern it might put CA offside with India, the country which wields the most clout in the game.

India is cricket's financial powerhouse and also exerts massive influence at the administration table given it and the other countries on the subcontinent are supporters of Zimbabwe and usually vote en masse.

However the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) allayed CA's private concerns when it acknowledged it recognised Australia's boycott was decided by the government.



Australia funding terrorists - Zimbabwe

http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/Australia-funding-terrorists--Zimbabwe/2007/05/17/1178995278288.html

Australia is funding terrorism and Prime Minister John Howard is a war criminal, Zimbabwe's Information and Publicity Minister Sikhanyiso Ndlovu says.

"He is the international gestapo and a criminal ... he is worse than anybody else, his actions in banning the cricket is just one example of being the gestapo," Dr Ndlovu said of Mr Howard.

Dr Ndlovu said Australia was financing people who were destabilising the Zimbabwean regime.
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 17th, 2007 at 1:15pm by freediver »  

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48862
At my desk.
Zimbabwe extends ban on protests
Reply #12 - May 25th, 2007 at 11:04am
 
http://www.smh.com.au/news/World/Zimbabwe-extends-ban-on-protests/2007/05/25/1179601607350.html

Zimbabwe police have extended a ban on political rallies and protests in Harare which the country's embattled opposition has likened to "a state of emergency".

President Robert Mugabe's government imposed a three-month ban against rallies and demonstrations in February over fears of an opposition uprising in the face of a deepening economic crisis.

The Zimbabwe Broadcasting Corporation (ZBC) reported that police authorities had extended the ban by another month in central Harare and in several volatile townships in the capital "in the interest of preserving peace and public order".



ICC annual meeting to discuss Zimbabwe

http://www.smh.com.au/news/Sport/ICC-annual-meeting-to-discuss-Zimbabwe/2007/06/22/1182019310453.html

The International Cricket Council (ICC) will discuss troubled Zimbabwe's Test status and try to resolve an internal tussle over its future president at an annual meeting to be held in London starting on Sunday.



Windies cancel A team tour of Zimbabwe

http://www.smh.com.au/news/Sport/Windies-cancel-A-team-tour-of-Zimbabwe/2007/06/29/1182624121282.html

The West Indies Cricket Board (WICB) have cancelled their proposed A team tour of Zimbabwe this year.

A WICB spokesman in Antigua said a full statement would be issued outlining the reasons.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jun 29th, 2007 at 11:36am by freediver »  

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48862
At my desk.
Re: Should our cricketers boycott Zimbabwe?
Reply #13 - Apr 2nd, 2008 at 4:15pm
 
from crikey:

Mugabe poised to resign: latest reports
Thomas Hunter writes:

The unthinkable may be about to unfold in Zimbabwe, with reports emerging that president Robert Mugabe’s 28-year rule is about to end.

The Times Online claims a series of meetings have been held to devise a “facesaving exit” for the despotic ruler following Saturday’s national election.

Talks began after Mr Mugabe’s closest cohorts gathered at State House to inform him that he had not only failed to win an outright victory in the weekend’s presidential election, but was beaten into second place by his challenger …

South Africa was leading the behind-the-scenes negotiations on a power-sharing deal in which a member of Mr Mugabe’s ruling Zanu (PF) party would assume a vice-presidential position. Such a deal would also ensure that Mr Mugabe retained immunity from prosecution for any crimes committed during his authoritarian rule.

“It is over for Mugabe. No one is now talking about him staying on, just somehow finding a graceful exit,” a diplomat said.

News of the potential resolution began appearing late this morning following a delay of almost five days in releasing the election results, during which it was plain to Zimbabweans and the international community that Mugabe was tampering with them. Perhaps resigned to the result, it now appears that Mugabe loyalists have been in dicussions about how their leader might step down, thereby honouring the voters' decision:

The results of Saturday's election – though the regime has been unwilling to publish the true outcome – has shocked them into realising that the people of that economically devastated country have finally, and decisively, turned against the man who once led them to political emancipation, but who turned out to be yet another African despot.

The New York Times claims:

President Robert G. Mugabe’s decades-old control of Zimbabwe seemed to erode further on Tuesday, as diplomats, analysts and opposition members contended that negotiations were underway for Mr. Mugabe to step down after trailing in the race for the country’s next president.

Further, News.com.au is reporting that Mugabe "is ready to step down after he accepted he failed to win the country's presidential election, a senior source in his ruling party and diplomats said today."

An official in Mr Mugabe's ZANU-PF party said the long-ruling president was prepared to step down but was still trying to win agreement from the army's chief of staff Constantine Chiwenga.

"He is prepared to step down because he doesn't want to embarrass himself by going to a run-off," the source said on condition of anonymity.

"There is only one person still blocking him, the army chief of staff."

But if an agreement has been reached, it appears to hinge on the silence of the Opposition, which continues to deny its involvement in discussions over Mugabe's resignation. In a typically graceful speech last night, Moverment for Democratic Change leader Morgan Tsvangirai told Zimbabweans:

The challenge of giving birth to a new Zimbabwe founded on restoration and not on retribution; on equality and not discrimination; on love, not war; on tolerance, not hate.

After Saturday 29th of March 2008, Zimbabwe will never be the same again; the people have spoken with one voice.

I would like to thank the millions who came to reclaim their dignity and invest in the change they can trust.

I'd like to thank the thousands in every corner of our country who braved the cold to come and make a statement on Saturday 29th March: from the mothers in Bikita, grandfathers in Tsholotsho, widows in Mpopoma, sisters in Kwekwe, school teachers in Zhombe.

In those minutes inside the polling booth, each one of us re-wrote the history of Zimbabwe. For that particular moment we each held the destiny of our country in the pen we used to cast that vote.

The votes cast on Saturday was for change and a new beginning. It was a vote for jobs; it was a vote for food, for dignity, for respect, for decency and equality, for tolerance, for love, and for trust.

Our people, therefore, cannot wait for the execution of that mandate.

I know that in moments such as this there is a temptation to short-cut processes, and to resort to opportunistic pathways. We will exercise restraint, and leadership, as we have exercised over the years.

Indeed, for years we have refused to resort to violent and unconstitutional methods of achieving democratic change.

Against great seduction and temptation, we refuse to be swayed away from the paths of democracy and social justice. That commitment to those values will not be betrayed now.

However, I have to urge the electoral authority that is the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission, to proceed with haste, and I think two and a half days is not haste at all!

We, on our part, will tomorrow disclose the totals from our count based on published returns at polling stations. And will after that result make a comment.

Thank you.

If this morning's reports are accurate, Tsvangirai's next speech may be the one that Zimbabweans have been awaiting for decades.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 40717
Gender: male
Re: Should our cricketers boycott Zimbabwe?
Reply #14 - Apr 3rd, 2008 at 9:56am
 
It is a ruined country now.
Was better when it was Rhodesia and Ian Smith (?) was there .
Even though he may have been voted in under a white only vote, the blacks were infinitely better off under his rule.
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print