freediver wrote on Jun 14
th, 2007 at 4:07pm:
DT, it is consigned to the history books. History tends not to remember the great failures, but it is common knowledge that attempts to prove that genetics is to blame for these things have been made and have failed. I am not going to go to any effort to prove something that is already well known. I'm sure the information is available if you are actually interested enough to look into the original sources.
Bvllsh1t. You're just not answering a straight forward question because you have no frickin clue about the subject.
I think they did rather brilliant work in the late 19th century and early 20th century considering the primitive nature of science. They found physical differences and differences in behaviour depending on what race you were from.
But all of a sudden... study of genetic differences stopped... why?
Advanced science took off shortly after the age of political correctness. I highly doubt there is a school/university in the country that promotes the idea of investigating the differences in race... if anything, they focus on trying to prove that there is no such thing as race... given the leftist nature of Universities these days.
And IF you DARE claim that the area of 'race' is understudied, and the phychology of different races needs to be investigated further... you get sacked/threatened by the heads of the University.
And one of the things you learn even in primary school is that the potential/what makes up the human brain is largely unknown, and a great mystery of human anatomy. How can we say we really understand the potential of different races when we don't even understand something as vital as the human brain?
Who writes up the history of 'these great failures' anyway?
-Politically correct bigots at Universities... that's who.