freediver
Gold Member
![*](http://www.ozpolitic.com/yabbfiles/Templates/Forum/default/stargold.gif) ![*](http://www.ozpolitic.com/yabbfiles/Templates/Forum/default/stargold.gif) ![*](http://www.ozpolitic.com/yabbfiles/Templates/Forum/default/stargold.gif) ![*](http://www.ozpolitic.com/yabbfiles/Templates/Forum/default/stargold.gif)
Offline
![](http://www.ozpolitic.com/yabbfiles/avatars/UserAvatars/freediver.jpg)
www.ozpolitic.com
Posts: 49389
At my desk.
|
http://www.smh.com.au/news/Business/Woolworths-withdraws-own-brand-tissues/2007/08/27/1188067024805.html
Supermarket giant Woolworths has pulled its own brand of imported Indonesian tissue products from shelves over allegations their packaging makes misleading environmental claims.
The forestry union has called on the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) to investigate claims production of the Woolworths Select tissue and toilet paper degraded the environment while being labelled as sustainable.
The packaging had said the products were sourced from "sustainable forest fibre from an environmentally responsible company".
However, green groups say no Indonesian company has ever received such accreditation from internationally recognised bodies.
Coles hit by $5m fine over grogfight Katherine Jimenez and Vanda Carson April 27, 2005 COLES Myer has been hit with one of the biggest fines imposed on an Australian company for anti-competitive behaviour after the retail giant admitted trying to out-muscle smaller pub and bottleshop owners.
Admitting to five breaches of the Trade Practices Act, Coles agreed to pay a fine of $4.75million and costs of $250,000 to settle a two-year legal dispute with the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission.
The ACCC claims Coles - and its rival Woolworths - entered into contracts with pubs and bottle shops in NSW that it used to restrict or prevent smaller competitors from supplying packaged takeaway liquor to consumers.
Woolworths and Liquorland were accused of lodging objections to liquor licensing applications from other bottle shops and pubs before the NSW liquor licensing court. The supermarket chains would withdraw their objections if their smaller rivals agreed to certain conditions.
These included stopping pubs selling takeaway alcohol, opening a dedicated bottle shop or a drive-through bottle shop, offering home delivery services to customers or expanding their premises.
The settlement agreed on by ACCC and Coles will need to be approved by the Federal Court on Friday. Woolworths, which is fighting a similar ACCC action, is likely to lodge a submission arguing that the matter should not be settled, on the grounds that the outcome in relation to Coles may influence its case.
In 2003, the ACCC - under former chairman Allan Fels - brought an action against the two retailers, alleging that Coles's Liquorland had on 30 occasions breached Section 45 of the Trade Practices Act, which outlaws collusive behaviour, by entering into agreements that restricted the way small operators could run their businesses.
Woolworths is defending 16 alleged breaches of the act. Woolworths and Coles dominate Australia's $11billion packaged liquor sales, controlling more than 43 per cent of the market.
Publican Bob Bourne, of Gosford, NSW, told The Australian last night that he intended to pursue civil action against Coles now that it had admitted guilt.
"I asked the ACCC what compensation costs are due to me. Now I am seeking $2million damages for the loss of trade for five years," Mr Bourne said.
"Following the five (breaches), there could well now be five separate instances where people individually sue them (Coles) with a strong footing, because they have admitted guilt."
Mr Bourne owns the Henry Kendell Family Tavern in West Gosford. He was asked to sign an agreement by Coles in 2000 when he attempted to take over a site vacated by the retailers's Liquorland store.
Coles allegedly imposed several conditions, including a ban on selling or home-delivering packaged liquor, which in turn affected the value of the lease.
In January, he successfully had the conditions removed.
Mr Bourne intends to seek compensation for the liquor sales he has been prevented from making since 2000. He said the price of the tavern was recently assessed and the valuer put an "extra $465,000 on the value of the lease because of the striking-out of those conditions".
In a statement yesterday, Coles said its commitment to complying with the Trade Practices Act was "unwavering".
"These events are very much in the past and since they took place we have developed and implemented a group-wide trade practices compliance strategy that seeks to engage all aspects of our operations," Coles chief John Fletcher said.
This latest storm comes as criticism builds about the market dominance of the two retailers, not only across the liquor market but also in petrol and fresh food. Combined, it is estimated that Coles and Woolworths control about 80c of every grocery dollar spent in Australia.
Suppliers have also complained of bullying tactics.
Last week, millionaire businessman Dick Smith claimed his food company had been threatened with having its peanut butter removed by Coles if it did not pay up-front to keep it on the shelves.
Woolworths controls about 25per cent of the liquor market through its Dan Murphy and Beer Wine and Spirits banners. Last November, it paid about $1.3billion for pub and gaming company Australian Leisure and Hospitality, which will extend its share, particularly in Queensland.
Coles has an 18 per cent share through its Liquorland and Vintage Cellars banner. Soon it will aggressively roll out a new, large format called First Choice Superstores to target the value end of the market.
Woolworths declined to comment yesterday.
|