Hi all.

I've decided to conduct a few online lessons of the ways the government, media and church groups attempt to 'trick' you into thinking that multiculturalism's 'great' and that monoculturalism (Ie. Australian/European culture) is bad.

The first lesson is entitled:

Multiculturalism propaganda news articles: 'How they fool you.'

All  pro-multiculturalism articles usually follow these rules:

1) Using 'food' as the central theme of article.  
2) Avoding all other benefits that Multiculturalism supposedly gives.
3) Sweeping all the negatives multiculturalism brings under the rug.
4) Make multiculturalism doubters feel 'stupid' or 'guilty.'  
5) DO NOT obtain opposing sources (Someone who is against it).

1) Using 'food' as the central theme of article.

Usually the central theme of multiculturalism propaganda articles are quite clearly the 'food.' It's probably the only benefit people can think of when thinking about multiculturalism. -This accounts for both anti-multiculturalists and pro-multiculturalists.

However, it becomes quite clear to both parties, that, after assessing multiculturalism, and having a deeper think about it, there aren't many benefits for it after all.


But, being bigoted pro-multiculturalist journalists, they try to cover it up by placing the entire article on 'food' as a benefit of multiculturalism... and milking it for all its worth.

Let's take this Canadian article as an example...

http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=ef44de20-9b81-4630-bb37-9...


Here's the opening two paragraphs of the article:

Quote:


So right from the word go, this article relates to food as a benefit of multiculturalism, as so-called 'proof' that it's working.


The article continues:

Quote:


Again, another unnecessary mention of the word curry.

But the word (And the articles focus on 'food' as a defense) continues to be used throughout the article:

Quote:


Again, they're relating to food as a benefit. Clearly wasting two or three paragraphs rambling. And unfairly stereotyping all Englishmans love of curry.


Quote:


You see this sentence here? The journalist has actually disguised the sentence to actually make it seem like he's making a 'looooong' list of benefits, when in fact... he only mentions one... yep... the food.


Quote:


-More emphasis on food. What is this? A cooking article?


Quote:


At last... the author rounds up with this 'wonderful' piece of journalism. Concluding that since people like curry... multiculturalism must be working.

3) Sweeping all the negatives multiculturalism brings under the rug.

It seems that one of the key strategies multiculturalism propaganda articles focus on doing... is stating the negatives of multiculturalism very quickly and tending not to address them.

They quickly brush the issues aside and dismiss them as nothing, whereas they shift their focus to feel-good stories about 'food' and change the entire article into a cooking catalogue.

Again... let's shift our focus back to the Canadian article:

Quote:


The article from its opening makes it clear that multiculturalism does indeed have its problems, but in the next paragraph dismisses it and 'claims' that the over-riding factor in all this is the so-called 'curry.'

Another example:

Quote:


Look at how the journalist merely 'touches' on the subject and brushes it aside?

Next paragraph:

Quote:


Touches and then dismisses.. same pattern over and over again. Notice how he continues to avoid the topic and fails to go in depth?

did you come up with all of that yourself? (except the quotes of course)

ex-member DonaldTrump wrote on Jul 5^th, 2007 at 3:43am:


fast forward time to 2050 and everyone will be laughing at those multiculteralists, joking about their naivity and stupidity.

the young lady could not grasp why throwing 4 completly different conflicting cultures into the same small vicinity was not the smartest way to go about things. " I had to explain to her the obvious outcome of a situation like this, i mean remember syndey back in 2020?"