Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 
Send Topic Print
The facts on IR laws (Read 41040 times)
deepthought
Gold Member
*****
Offline


In Defence Of Liberty

Posts: 2869
Re: The facts on IR laws
Reply #150 - May 7th, 2008 at 9:43pm
 
Aussie wrote on May 7th, 2008 at 6:50pm:
We'll see, won't we!!

Cool


Indeed.  Then you will apologise to all Australians for voting Liebor?
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
athiest
Ex Member


Re: The facts on IR laws
Reply #151 - May 8th, 2008 at 12:18pm
 
"Treasury's assessment of the plan is contained in an executive minute dated April 18 of last year, before the federal election."

This is very funny, deepthought you notice the date?april 18, thats a week before Labor released their IR policy. So the former gov asked the reserve bank to make asumptions on a non existent policy,mmm, a thinking man may come to the asumption that the former gov were trying to discredit Labor at the time whilst a rusted on Lib supporter may just buy this story from the Liberal party gazzet as fact whilst singing la la la la la .
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
deepthought
Gold Member
*****
Offline


In Defence Of Liberty

Posts: 2869
Re: The facts on IR laws
Reply #152 - May 8th, 2008 at 5:34pm
 
Quote:
"Treasury's assessment of the plan is contained in an executive minute dated April 18 of last year, before the federal election."

This is very funny, deepthought you notice the date?april 18, thats a week before Labor released their IR policy. So the former gov asked the reserve bank to make asumptions on a non existent policy,mmm, a thinking man may come to the asumption that the former gov were trying to discredit Labor at the time whilst a rusted on Lib supporter may just buy this story from the Liberal party gazzet as fact whilst singing la la la la la .


So the Liebor policy is extensively different to the one analysed athiest?

They never were going to dismantle WorkChoices and re-introduce a punishing unfair dimissal regime?

Funny that - because they have done the former and are planning the latter.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 
Send Topic Print