mozzaok
Gold Member
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04666/04666d3b526a48e324509e26a2bf75951790e5e0" alt="*" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04666/04666d3b526a48e324509e26a2bf75951790e5e0" alt="*" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04666/04666d3b526a48e324509e26a2bf75951790e5e0" alt="*" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04666/04666d3b526a48e324509e26a2bf75951790e5e0" alt="*"
Offline
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c1c0/4c1c0155efe533bee0b9a7eef27e06675cabb91c" alt=""
OzPolitic
Posts: 6741
Melbourne
Gender:
|
More lame arguments. FD, you could use the same argument to all humans, just wear hessian bags, and eat beans and rice, and give the rest to charity. You do not need to be religious to be charitable. Promoting life, and doing charity are not mutually exclusive.
And muso, that thing you couldn't work out what the atheists were promoting, is in the slogan, it is LIFE.
Sure it is a little reactionary, and a little cutesy, but I think it may help atheists to find a voice, to counter those of all the religious lobbyists, who try to see their individual faith based agendas favoured by governments, as people who classify themselves as having 'no religion' makes up a significant proportion of the community, and have no self promoting agenda to push, other than that things be done for rational, and humane reasons, then I don't see it as a problem.
|