Soren wrote on Aug 4
th, 2010 at 10:45am:
Please delete wrote on Aug 4
th, 2010 at 10:31am:
So our achilles heel is that we don't know the answer to that huge question?
Nobody knows the answer to that.
No, your achilles heel is that you construct your belief system without being able to even engage with the foundations of your beliefs. The feet of your elephant go
all the way down...
In short you believe/pretend that you don't belive. But you do.
Believe in what? A basic first cause Deity which set the wheels in motion, a full-blown Christian God complete with JC on a stick, an Allah that's all merciful or one of the other guys with an Elephant's trunk or multiple arms?
I can buy the Deist God to some extent, but not the ones with baggage.
If we're talking about a real Achilles heel, it's the propensity to rush in with a Eureka-like solution in the absence of evidence. New Atheists do it, as do Religious Fundamentalists.
Without a reasonably full set of ingredients, all you'll get is a half-baked cake or in the case of New Atheists, no cake at all, but they also insist that nobody else must eat.
The ancients settled for many half-baked cakes and decided that each one was fully baked. Each has its own pons asinorum, and they all led to different islands where they could defend their collective faiths and occasionally rough up the heretics a bit.
We are all starving for this knowledge. We all have a drive to know more about this very interesting existence that we're thrust into, where we end up on a soggy rock flying around a massive thermonuclear reactor once a year.
If we want to learn more, we need to use our perceptions and learn about this incredible place where we live (and I don't mean Rural Queensland). It's all we have. Are we any closer to answering this big question? I don't think so, and I suspect that we are all in the same position.
That was the view from my lofty peak. I don't consider my view to be superior to your lofty peak - just different.
We all process information from our universe and we all decide individually at various stages which piece of data is likely to be dangerous, interesting, pleasurable or important, and those subconscious decisions define our individual paradigms for life.
The process is identical. The results vary, as do the neural pathways