Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Family tax benefits to be means-tested (Read 1942 times)
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49133
At my desk.
Family tax benefits to be means-tested
Jan 24th, 2008 at 8:02pm
 
This is a good idea. It will help support the income tax cuts and help bring inflation under control. Rich people should not be getting welfare.

http://news.smh.com.au/family-tax-benefits-to-be-meanstested/20080124-1nyj.html

All family tax benefit recipients could soon be means-tested as the federal government tries to bring inflation into line.

The annual consumer price index rose 3.0 per cent in the year to December, while underlying inflation has accelerated to 3.6 per cent.

The new Labor government has announced cuts to government spending to produce budget surpluses of 1.5 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP).
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
deepthought
Gold Member
*****
Offline


In Defence Of Liberty

Posts: 2869
Re: Family tax benefits to be means-tested
Reply #1 - Jan 24th, 2008 at 8:11pm
 
Bang goes the egalitarianism the coalition fostered.   It's back to the 'us and them' mentality of Liebor.

Woe is us.   Angry
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 40758
Gender: male
Re: Family tax benefits to be means-tested
Reply #2 - Jan 24th, 2008 at 9:30pm
 
my family tax benefit is already means tested, I am sure.

ie, the amount I get varies according to my income.
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49133
At my desk.
Rudd promises to keep tax cuts
Reply #3 - Jan 25th, 2008 at 2:05pm
 
http://news.smh.com.au/rudd-promises-to-keep-tax-cuts/20080125-1o2f.html

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has promised to deliver his election promise of about $31 billion in tax cuts despite inflation being at decade-high levels.

Mr Rudd said he took seriously his pre-election promises and the government's five-point plan would tackle inflation.

"It would be wrong to walk away from those commitments and we also made sure our non-tax commitments were very modest, costing much less than that being put forward by the government at the time, the Liberals," he told the Nine Network.

The prime minister said the government would take the pressure off the Reserve Bank to raise interest rates by targeting a budget surplus of $18 billion and establishing bodies such as Skills Australia and Infrastructure Australia.

"I said throughout 2007 that I was not going to put myself in a position, like my predecessors, of delivering public lectures to the Reserve Bank," Mr Rudd said.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
deepthought
Gold Member
*****
Offline


In Defence Of Liberty

Posts: 2869
Re: Rudd promises to keep tax cuts
Reply #4 - Jan 29th, 2008 at 7:24pm
 
freediver wrote on Jan 25th, 2008 at 2:05pm:
http://news.smh.com.au/rudd-promises-to-keep-tax-cuts/20080125-1o2f.html

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has promised to deliver his election promise of about $31 billion in tax cuts despite inflation being at decade-high levels.

Mr Rudd said he took seriously his pre-election promises and the government's five-point plan would tackle inflation.

"It would be wrong to walk away from those commitments and we also made sure our non-tax commitments were very modest, costing much less than that being put forward by the government at the time, the Liberals," he told the Nine Network.

The prime minister said the government would take the pressure off the Reserve Bank to raise interest rates by targeting a budget surplus of $18 billion and establishing bodies such as Skills Australia and Infrastructure Australia.

"I said throughout 2007 that I was not going to put myself in a position, like my predecessors, of delivering public lectures to the Reserve Bank," Mr Rudd said.


This is the tosser who declared inflation has been a problem since 2006.  So why offer the inflation creating tax cuts?

He lies.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 38791
Gender: male
Re: Family tax benefits to be means-tested
Reply #5 - Jan 29th, 2008 at 9:12pm
 
Quote:
So why offer the inflation creating tax cuts?


Dunno whether it is established that they are 'inflation creating?'

But fact is, DT, if he did not, you and your ilk would be complaining about broken promises.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49133
At my desk.
Re: Family tax benefits to be means-tested
Reply #6 - Jan 29th, 2008 at 9:35pm
 
It is commonly accepted among economists that the tax cuts will create inflation - if they are not matched by spending cuts. Short term inflation is important at the moment, so it is important to reduce spending quickly otherwise he may exacerbate short term fluctuations in GDP (ie, boom-bust cycles). However we may be a recession by the time the effects kick in as it is hard to predict how long the current boom will last. Of course, it is better safe than sorry.

Obviously in the long term the tax cuts will have to be matched by spending cuts otherwise the government would have to print or borrow money or reverse the tax cuts. So in the long term, the tax cuts will lead to higher GDP. It's just the timing that is unfortunate, or probably will be.

There are plenty of handouts Rudd could get rid of. I'd like to see the baby bonus and housing subsidy go. It was uncharacteristic of the coalition to introduce such handouts.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
deepthought
Gold Member
*****
Offline


In Defence Of Liberty

Posts: 2869
Re: Family tax benefits to be means-tested
Reply #7 - Jan 29th, 2008 at 10:45pm
 
Aussie wrote on Jan 29th, 2008 at 9:12pm:
Quote:
So why offer the inflation creating tax cuts?


Dunno whether it is established that they are 'inflation creating?'

But fact is, DT, if he did not, you and your ilk would be complaining about broken promises.


Even the loopy 'economists' agree with me that if you punch a lot of money ($31b) back into the hands of the mushrooms blindly stumbling into a Liebor led recession that there will be an inflationary effect on an economy driven by learner drivers.

Given the right circumstances of growth matching the cash (neutral outcome) there wouldn't be much of an impact.  But in a Liebor collapsed shrinking economy the effect will be substantial.  And it will.  This is another tactic to ensure we have a recession.  Liebor love them because they drive inflation and interest rates down artificially at the expense of the plebs.  They did it in the 80's/90's.

But my ilk and I are not concerned with 'broken promises', we are concerned the promises were made at all.   After all, Little Kevvy Liar has been crowing about inflation and pointing at everyone but him.  He reckons that it has been escalating since 2006.  Why then, in 2007, was he contributing to it by promising tax cuts at all?  If he knew of the inflation as early as 2006 why exacerbate it the following year?  

Does he think we are as stupid as him?  Does he think we will believe his lies if he says them often enough?

He's a loser.  That's why I voted Liberal.  I don't enjoy recessions.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print