Aussie wrote on Apr 1
st, 2008 at 7:54pm:
None of that, at all, DT.
Fact is............he helped arm Japan to invade eg, China. (It did not stop there, of course.)
Do you wish to argue that was for the benefit of the Chinese people?
No. It was for the benefit of our two peoples. Australia and Japan. China was not a party to the trade and is irrelevant.
freediver wrote on Apr 1
st, 2008 at 8:29pm:
Pretending that a country is not an enemy until the point when you are officially at war is naive in the extreme. The AWB got done for their deals with Saddam before the current war began. If the government rules that we can sell stuff to them, their will never be any constitutional barriers. That's any even lower bar than legality, which I didn't think was possible.
Sadly, but as always, you are dead wrong.
First no one can tell the future (despite Aussie's revelations about the clairvoyant skills of Bob Menzies). It is naive to believe it is so.
Second no one knows in advance a war, or any war, will break out - even up to the eve of it. It is naive to think anything is certain.
Third the Japanese were not an 'enemy' of Australia in 1937-8. It is naive to think they were.
Fourth the Commonwealth Constitution deals with matters of international trade - it is naive to think you know better than the framers of it.
Fifth neither the government nor any individual may break laws - our constitional democracy is founded on the rule of law. Only the naive thinks that complying with the constitution is lower than legality.
Fifth Saddam Hussein is not relevant to China nor Japan. It is naive to think he has any bearing on this off topic meandering.