Just after noon on 28th April 1996, an unknown marksman opened fire on diners in the Broad Arrow Cafe at Port Arthur in Australia. In less than 20 minutes at this and five other crime scenes, the marksman killed 35, injured 22, and crippled two cars with only 64 shots. Nineteen of the first twenty dead in the Broad Arrow Cafe died from single shots to the head, all fired by the unknown marksman from his right hip. This staggering display of marksman- ship was blamed on left-handed and intellectually impaired Martin Bryant, whose shooting experience extended to popping off cans in the bush, and had no military training of any kind. From the time of his arrest, remand prisoner Martin Bryant was illegally held in strict solitary confinement and denied access to media of any kind until his police interrogation on 4th July 1996. When he refused to admit to the Port Arthur Massacre at interrogation, he was once more placed back in illegal solitary confinement. Eventually in desperation during November 1996, Martin Bryant pleaded "guilty" 72 times, thereby allowing the authorities to avoid a humiliating trial at which they could present no hard evidence of guilt. Intellectually impaired Martin Bryant was convicted by a hysterical media pack, then forced to plead guilty by prison officials illegally enforcing solitary confinement.

http://home.overflow.net.au/~nedwood/portarthur.html

Don't believe everything you read.

Originally he pled not guilty which was refused.

He was able to be an extremely good shot in the cafe and other places yet when he was holed up in a building for the final siege he fired off dozens of shots without a single hit. When police snipers were moving in to the building he told them to back off as they were going to 'hit your (their) main man' and the building was destroyed shortly after without there being an investigation in to it. Why was the building destroyed to start with? Destroying evidence isn't usually how things are done.

Read the investigation it raises a lot of questions.

So what are we all implying now? That JWH, the Liberal govt and the AFP or SAS killed some innocent people, set up a patsy so that they can enact the gun buyback scheme and implement new gun laws?

:

i just spent an hour re reading some of the inconsistancies in the official story of port arthur...and there are MANY glaring mistakes and inconsistancies....

my question is; how can all these facts be available that would form a case for an inquirey, yet there is none?

as a side note. joe vialls was a dis information stooge. so dont go with his side of events. he sets up the 'alternate' view of things to fail....

things like saying the gunman only took 90 seconds in the cafe to murder those people, (which is the official line) but witnesses say the shooting happened over 5 minutes.....also, vialls contends it was israeli gunmen....so as to turn the conspiracy into anti-semitism, and deflect the blame away from our intelligence/military, who would most likely be the ones to have to carry out such horror..

all i can do is enlighten you. for you to see, you must first open your eyes..

where were the witnesses situated during this event acid...????

One of my favourite things was this.....

Often a witness would say that something happened in just five minutes.

My next question was silence.....

(While I counted, to my self, hoping to reach 60 seconds.)

Invariably, the Judge would intervene out of impatience, and thus help me out, because they always jumped in well before I got even close to 60 seconds.

I'd then ask the witness, 'Was it as long as that."

"No," just as invariably.

Test it yourself.

We always exaggerate time lapse.