Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21
Send Topic Print
Ban religious schools? (Read 44328 times)
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48864
At my desk.
Re: Ban religious schools?
Reply #255 - Dec 30th, 2009 at 5:13pm
 
Quote:
It is, you're right, but up to a point.


And where is that point? Where they start ot be different and you feel segregated? Where they choose to bring their children up differently to how you do?

Quote:
Can you imagine giving people like abu full control over the way they want to practice their religion?


He does have full control. That is the nature of freedom. People have the right to choose to believe things that scare you. But it is only when they do actual harm that you can put them in jail for it. Abu is even allowed to bring up children.

Quote:
What i going on about is that, i feel that children should be encouraged to think critically.

Education may be about learning facts, but it should also be about teaching students to be willing to, and to have the courage to, challenge those things [including currently accepted 'paradigms'], that [through the acquisition of new knowledge] they can see as illogical, irrational, or absurd.


I was taught that, beginning in high school. Especially in history, but also in English. In science we were still being given the tools to make that sort of contribution.

Quote:
Throughout man's history, it has been rebels, and those who have challenged authority and the accepted science of the day, that have always led us to new truths.


Not exactly. If there were no establishment, there would be no rebels, only chaos. Nowhere is this more true than in science. It is only possible to rebel against the establishment after the currently accepted paradigm has been pushed to its limits by those who believe it. Those who extend the current paradigm contribute just as much as those who bring it down.

Quote:
I think it's important to focus on what is not acceptable, and for me an example might be religious or any other teachings that tell the students that they are some kind of elite -  For example, a Fundamentalist Christian school in which students were regularly instructed that faiths other than Christianity are to be despised as evil, or that adherents of other faiths, and indeed faithless atheists are doing the work of the Devil and must be shunned. This would be unacceptable in a school even if such doctrines were an integral part of the beliefs of the church that ran the school.


That is also part of freedom of religion - the freedom to believe, and to tell your children, that yours is the one true religion. Can you imagine telling a Christian that they must instruct their children that buddhists also go to heaven? Does that sound like freedom of religion, or some naive, government imposed 'utopia'?

Quote:
Why? - because it's working against the fabric of society, causing division.


That's the great thing about freedom. We are not all the same. But it is not against the fabric of our society. It is the fabric of our society. It is truly astonishing how quickly some would do away with it.

Quote:
We have to draw a line somewhere.


Perhaps we should choose a better spot. Drawing the line for the sake of drawing a line isn't much help.

Quote:
It is unacceptable to cause division and prejudice in society


That's what our entire political system is based on. It seems to work pretty well. Should we ban Alan Jones whil we are at it?

Quote:
just as it is unacceptable to teach kids that cannibalism is right


I think you'll find there is a significant difference between encouraging a child to eat dead people and telling them that a nother person is not going to heaven. If you don't believe in heaven, why are you so upset if someone else believes you are not going there? Are you jelous?

Quote:
I've said this before, but there is a need for a totally impartial program  that promotes harmony within society, because it's in the best interests of society to understand the different groups.


So we should teach our children to understand the different groups by denying them the right to be a different group? To me it seems like that would be teaching them the opposite of understanding.

Quote:
If you ban religious schools, FD is right in saying that you are limiting religious freedom, and Abu is right in saying that the religious indoctrination would just take place in another forum, such as home or  church/ mosque.


Until you find some other bullshit excuse for banning it there too. After all, the exact same bullshit arguments you are using to ban religious schools work just as well. Remember that Abu is just as keen as you to deny religious freedom because his version of freedom of religion involves stoning apostates to death. You should be careful who you get into bed with. It is only through freedom of religion, freedom of speech etc - freedom our ancestors died to protect and give to us - that you are even allowed to make these 'heretical' arguments. Can you not see the irony here? Do you really think atheists will come out on top if the government disposes with freedom of religion?

Quote:
The best compromise is to allow religious schools, but insist on a curriculum that is not divisive. (Yes - it is possible)


Wrong. The best compromise is to respect people's freedom of religion.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48864
At my desk.
Re: Ban religious schools?
Reply #256 - Dec 30th, 2009 at 5:15pm
 
Quote:
Yadda has a good point about critical thinking. We should be providing an environment where the student can question what the teacher is saying (to a reasonable extent). We should focus on teaching kids how to think for themselves rather than what to think.


But you are doing the opposite. You are trying to dictate to not only children, but their parents as well, what they are allowed to think. You are denying them the right to be different, because you think that being different is a danger to society. You are confusing groupthink with critical thinking. You are confusing agreement with you for independent thought. Perhaps you think that you are the only one who is capable of critical thinking, therefor any division within society needs to be stamped out with critical thinking and banning certain teachings. If you really valued critical thinking, you would convinve adults of your wisdom, rather than stealing their children to 're-educate' them to your liking.

Quote:
Such an environment has been shown to be more conducive to good learning habits anyway.


By who? Hitler? The Chinese government?

Quote:
Well, buzz off to MV and don't comment then.......oh that's right, they banned you.


WTF? They banned Abu?



Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
jordan484
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Genuine Aussie

Posts: 1115
Re: Ban religious schools?
Reply #257 - Dec 30th, 2009 at 5:36pm
 
Yes they suspended him, then he tried to come back as an alter before the suspension was up, so both accounts were banned. Now suspicion that he has come back again, with yet another alter and I'm pretty sure they're correct judging by the posting style.
Back to top
 

"We should always say that I may refrain from publishing a cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed, but it's because I fear you. Don't for one moment think it's because I respect you." Richard Dawkins
 
IP Logged
 
mantra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ozpolitic.com

Posts: 10750
Gender: female
Re: Ban religious schools?
Reply #258 - Dec 30th, 2009 at 6:34pm
 
I find it difficult to believe Abu would deliberately flout rules and return under different disguises to try and sneak back into a forum.

Back to top
« Last Edit: Dec 30th, 2009 at 7:01pm by mantra »  
 
IP Logged
 
jordan484
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Genuine Aussie

Posts: 1115
Re: Ban religious schools?
Reply #259 - Dec 30th, 2009 at 9:00pm
 
Difficult as you may find it, it is very true, nonetheless.
Back to top
 

"We should always say that I may refrain from publishing a cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed, but it's because I fear you. Don't for one moment think it's because I respect you." Richard Dawkins
 
IP Logged
 
abu_rashid
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Aussie Muslim

Posts: 8353
Re: Ban religious schools?
Reply #260 - Dec 30th, 2009 at 9:05pm
 
Quote:
I find it difficult to believe Abu would deliberately flout rules and return under different disguises to try and sneak back into a forum.


Guilty as charged mantra.

I sometimes flout the rules, hard as it is to believe  Tongue
Back to top
 
abu_rashid  
IP Logged
 
jordan484
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Genuine Aussie

Posts: 1115
Re: Ban religious schools?
Reply #261 - Dec 30th, 2009 at 9:06pm
 
Quote:
And where is that point? Where they start ot be different and you feel segregated? Where they choose to bring their children up differently to how you do?


Where they choose to teach their children their way is the absolute truth and there is no other, where they condone hatred and violence towards those that are different and have different views, where they dispute scientific fact and where they have no respect for independent thought.

It isn't about bringing their children up "differently" it's about frowning upon brainwashing innocent minds into believing ancients cult ideals.
Back to top
 

"We should always say that I may refrain from publishing a cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed, but it's because I fear you. Don't for one moment think it's because I respect you." Richard Dawkins
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48864
At my desk.
Re: Ban religious schools?
Reply #262 - Dec 30th, 2009 at 9:20pm
 
Quote:
Where they choose to teach their children their way is the absolute truth and there is no other


Isn't that pretty much the definition of religion?

Quote:
where they condone hatred and violence towards those that are different and have different views


Are you aware of any Australian schools that condone violence?

Quote:
and where they have no respect for independent thought


How is it respectful of independent thought to want to ban institutions because they teach people to think differently to you?

Quote:
It isn't about bringing their children up "differently" it's about frowning upon brainwashing innocent minds into believing ancients cult ideals.


So in other words, it is about denying people freedom of religion because you don't like their religion. Because they are different, you can only come to terms with it by insisting they are brainwashed and lack your special gift of independent thought. You cannot comprehend the difference, so you fear it and want to destroy it.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
jordan484
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Genuine Aussie

Posts: 1115
Re: Ban religious schools?
Reply #263 - Dec 30th, 2009 at 9:24pm
 
No. I think you're a little off track with the whole religious schools thing. You can't seem to separate religion and the freedom to practice one's religion, with religious schools. There is a difference.
Back to top
 

"We should always say that I may refrain from publishing a cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed, but it's because I fear you. Don't for one moment think it's because I respect you." Richard Dawkins
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48864
At my desk.
Re: Ban religious schools?
Reply #264 - Dec 30th, 2009 at 9:30pm
 
What is the difference? Are people free to have religion, but not to practice it in ways that certain people object to for no other reason than that they don't like religion?

Religion is critical to the freedom to practice religion. Once the government starts dictating what religion is, it dictates how it may be practiced.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
jordan484
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Genuine Aussie

Posts: 1115
Re: Ban religious schools?
Reply #265 - Dec 30th, 2009 at 9:37pm
 
So you're ok with Muslims introducing sharia law? Maybe ok with Christians adhering to out-dated laws, facts and ideals? Should we gather up all gays tonight and hang them, really, because that's what real religious freedom would allow.
Back to top
 

"We should always say that I may refrain from publishing a cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed, but it's because I fear you. Don't for one moment think it's because I respect you." Richard Dawkins
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48864
At my desk.
Re: Ban religious schools?
Reply #266 - Dec 30th, 2009 at 9:56pm
 
Quote:
So you're ok with Muslims introducing sharia law?


No.

Quote:
Maybe ok with Christians adhering to out-dated laws, facts and ideals?


Sure. Thou shalt not lie is a good one. If have no complaints if Christians refrain from lying.

Quote:
Should we gather up all gays tonight and hang them


No.

Quote:
because that's what real religious freedom would allow


No it wouldn't. Remember what I said about demonstrable harm?

This is not just about freedom of religion. It goes for all freedoms. They only extend to where they start infringing on the freedom of others. I'm not sure why you have such difficulty judging where the line should be drawn, or where people who support freedom would draw it. It is not a choice between letting religious loonies hang people and stamping out religion by whatever little scheme you can think of, like stealing their children.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21690
A cat with a view
Re: Ban religious schools?
Reply #267 - Dec 31st, 2009 at 8:56am
 
freediver wrote on Dec 30th, 2009 at 5:15pm:
But you are doing the opposite. You are trying to dictate to not only children, but their parents as well, what they are allowed to think.
You are denying them the right to be different, because you think that being different is a danger to society. You are confusing groupthink with critical thinking.
You are confusing agreement with you for independent thought. Perhaps you think that you are the only one who is capable of critical thinking, therefor any division within society needs to be stamped out with critical thinking and banning certain teachings. If you really valued critical thinking, you would convinve adults of your wisdom, rather than stealing their children to 're-educate' them to your liking.




FD,

To me, you seem to be promoting 'freedom of religion', as a variation of the right of freedom of thought.

But what if a philosophy [a 'religion'], who we extend 'tolerance' toward, actually [and actively! and violently!] prohibited critical thinking, in 'others'?
['others' being everyone outside of the influence of that philosophy]

Should such an intolerant philosophy be tolerated, by a society who claims 'tolerance' as a virtue???

Please explain to me, why???




Are you suggesting that we should tolerate, the intolerant???

Why?

Are you suggesting that it is rational to tolerate the intolerant, just so as to 'prove' our own tolerance?

If yes, then why not open all of the jails!
/sarc off



Abandoning moral standards, is not tolerance,
it is insanity!





Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
jordan484
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Genuine Aussie

Posts: 1115
Re: Ban religious schools?
Reply #268 - Dec 31st, 2009 at 9:17am
 
Quote:
stamping out religion by whatever little scheme you can think of


Banning religious schools is way short of stamping out religion. I still fail to see how this would impede religious freedom, people are still free to practice whatever religion they like, it just stops segregating children in an educational environment on the basis of religion. I maintain that it's a detrimental thing to do, it creates an "us" and "them" mentality, and when it's done so in a developing brain it's very, very difficult to change that mentality. This is why religions prosper.
Back to top
 

"We should always say that I may refrain from publishing a cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed, but it's because I fear you. Don't for one moment think it's because I respect you." Richard Dawkins
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: Ban religious schools?
Reply #269 - Dec 31st, 2009 at 9:23am
 
jordan484 wrote on Dec 31st, 2009 at 9:17am:
Banning religious schools is way short of stamping out religion. I still fail to see how this would impede religious freedom, people are still free to practice whatever religion they like, it just stops segregating children in an educational environment on the basis of religion. I maintain that it's a detrimental thing to do, it creates an "us" and "them" mentality, and when it's done so in a developing brain it's very, very difficult to change that mentality. This is why religions prosper.

Is there really a difference between segregating kids based on religion and segregating them based on socio-economic status?

In fact, I'd suggest segregation based on income has a far more profound formative effect than religion.
Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21
Send Topic Print