'SNIFFER DOGS OFFEND MUSLIMS 



Sniffer dogs could be banned

Friday June 27,2008
By Tom Whitehead, Home Affairs Correspondent   
POLICE sniffer dogs trained to spot terrorists at railway stations may no longer come into contact with Muslim passengers – after complaints that it is against the suspects’ religion.

A report for the Transport Department has raised the prospect that the animals should only touch passengers’ luggage because it is considered “more acceptable”.

In the Muslim faith, dogs are deemed to be spiritually “unclean”. But banning them from touching passengers would severely restrict their ability to do their job.

The report follows trials of station security measures in the wake of the 2005 London suicide bomb attacks. In one trial, some female Muslims said the use of a body scanner was also unacceptable because it was tantamount to being forced to strip.

British Transport Police last night insisted it would still use sniffer dogs – which are trained to detect explosives – with any passengers regardless of faith, but handlers would remain aware of “cultural sensitivities”.

Critics said the complaints were just the latest example of minority religions trying to force their rules and morals on British society.

Tory MP Philip Davies said: “As far as I am concerned, everyone should be treated equally in the face of the law and we cannot have people of different religious groups laying the law down. I hope the police will go about their business as they would do normally.”

News of the security setback came as the Government yesterday admitted that installing 100 per cent airport-style screening at rail and Tube stations was “not feasible."



http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/50071


How coincidental, terrorists offend me, the only terrorists that threaten the western world are muslims.

malik - hahahhahahaha

If muslims are so offended by sniffer dogs or scanners (both of which they have necessitated) they can walk and stay in their own country.

We are all happy then.


I wipe my arse on you being offended, your blook soaked koran and mohammad the kiddy molester.

I find paying tax offends my cultural sensitivity.
I think, as a NOYFB, I should be exempt from taxation, fines and other government charges which offend my religious sensibilities as a noyfb.


What is a NOYFB, I'll give you a clue, it is what I reply when asked my religion, and the last word is business.

mozzaok - hhhmmm
Is another word in "NOYFB"  "none."

Yes, as a "sprincyclisterian"  NOT being given $1,000,000 annually offends my deeply held beliefs.


I support you sensitively held views as a NOYFB

Should be able to lever in a few of us xians too !!
don't want to discriminate now, do you ??

90% , hhhhmmmm. Sometims I feel an odd figure sounds much more precise.

Say, 93.2 % ??

AAhhh, this is why I so like athiests !!!!!!!!!!!!


Sure, prisons and mental institutions may be good places to start.
But do they have the money ??

I guess it comes down to "What do you want ?" (as the leader of NOYFB movement) , the money or the numbers ??
I guess with the numbers, you must get the money.
Esp with the 93.2% tithing 


Mind you, I do like the sound of a govt funded school.
With your own govt funded schools, the next gen of NOYFBs are all trained right.

Well the great and worthy example of scientology shows that to receive government approved legal status as a religion, and all the attendant "RIGHTS", that this guarantees, we need to demonstrate having a group of followers that believe we are a religion.
We will start with the mentally challenged, and then move on to celebrities, it seems like a winning formula.

I do not wish to be classified as an atheist anymore, I now believe in FUKAL!

Really ??? Is that all ?
Just have to have followers, and you are a religion.


Hey, get a few mentally challenged followers and the lefty apologetics will be racing to give donations.
Won't be buckets big enough to carry the cash in.
The press will be immediate, free and abundant !!!!!!!!