Australian Politics Forum - the top 40 reasons to doubt the official 911 consp

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 49030 At my desk.	Re: the top 40 reasons to doubt the official 911 consp Reply #75 - Aug 18^th, 2008 at 2:18pm I think he'll be back.
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

locutius

Gold Member

Offline

You can't fight in here!
It's the War Room

Posts: 1817
Queensland
Gender: male

Re: the top 40 reasons to doubt the official 911 consp
Reply #76 - Aug 18^th, 2008 at 3:07pm

imperial wrote on Aug 18^th, 2008 at 12:34pm:

you are right...

george bush is a great leader. he must be. you agree with everything he says..

muslims threw kids overboard...

there were WMD..

all iraqis who fight americans in iraq are terrorists..

the russians started the war in georgia...

GW is the whole truth....

no use me and you debating these points.

Based on this childish response.........

Word of advise, Imp. Since by your own confession, you don't suffer fools gladly, might I suggest you avoid being alone at all cost. And as for you claim that you like debate, well I'm pretty sure the technique is a mystery to you. And while we can all replace argument with insult, only the base find it entertaining.

Back to top

I dream of a better tomorrow, where chickens can cross the road and not be questioned about their motives.

IP Logged

Lestat

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1403

Re: the top 40 reasons to doubt the official 911 consp
Reply #77 - Aug 19^th, 2008 at 10:49pm

freediver wrote on Aug 18^th, 2008 at 10:24am:

It is logical. A passport is made of paper (and a bit of plastic or something). It is light enough to get blown a long way in an explosion. A block box on the other hand is probably designed to stay with the wreckage.

haha. That is absolutely hilarious. An explosion that brings down a building, yet here you are arguing that it is logical that the passports survived this explosion.

You do realise that paper burns...don't you?

freediver wrote on Aug 18^th, 2008 at 10:24am:

Why wouldn't they?

Umm. I don't know, maybe because the extreme tempertures created from the explosion, which incinerated just about everything in its vicinity, including the black boxes, would also destroy the passports which believe it or not, being made of paper, does burn.

freediver wrote on Aug 18^th, 2008 at 10:24am:

Why wouldn't they? It was the heat that destroyed them, not the initial impact.

I didn't realise that passports are fire proof.

freediver wrote on Aug 18^th, 2008 at 10:24am:

Why wouldn't they?They do not disagree. You just don't understand what they are saying.

Oh I understand alright. I understand that you haven't even read the report signed by over 100 engineers questioning the official findings. Cause if you did, you wouldn't make such a ridiculous claim.

I don't understand what they were saying? lol. What they were saying is pretty clear cut. I suggest you read it before making yourself look foolish.

Back to top

IP Logged

NorthOfNorth

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male

Re: the top 40 reasons to doubt the official 911 consp
Reply #78 - Aug 20^th, 2008 at 12:06am

Lestat wrote on Aug 19^th, 2008 at 10:49pm:

Oh I understand alright. I understand that you haven't even read the report signed by over 100 engineers questioning the official findings. Cause if you did, you wouldn't make such a ridiculous claim.

I don't understand what they were saying? lol. What they were saying is pretty clear cut. I suggest you read it before making yourself look foolish.

Which list of the 100+ engineers are you referring to? The ones I have found included up to 12 theologians and probably three quarters of the remainder are professors of law, English, sociology, political science, economics, mathematics, chemistry, medicine and history (i.e. not engineers of any kind). I did find, however, a list of over 1000 structural engineers certified by the Structural Engineering Certification Board, apparently none of whom dispute the well known 9/11 version of events. How do you account for this?

Back to top

Conviction is the art of being certain

IP Logged

imperial

Senior Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 268

Re: the top 40 reasons to doubt the official 911 consp
Reply #79 - Aug 20^th, 2008 at 6:13am

he(s)lian
Quote:

I did find, however, a list of over 1000 structural engineers certified by the Structural Engineering Certification Board, apparently none of whom dispute the well known 9/11 version of events. How do you account for this?

wheres your proof.....show me a LINK....for "1000 structural engineers.."

here is 428 Architects and Engineers that doubt the official lie....http://www.ae911truth.org/signpetition.php

Prominent Structural Engineers Say Official Version of 9/11 "Impossible" "Defies Common Logic" "Violates the Law of Phys
http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/diarypage.php?did=7524

how do you account for this..? he lian....

Back to top

IP Logged

imperial Senior Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 268	Re: the top 40 reasons to doubt the official 911 consp Reply #80 - Aug 20^th, 2008 at 6:16am freediver wrote on Aug 18^th, 2008 at 2:18pm: I think he'll be back.
Back to top	IP Logged

NorthOfNorth

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male

Re: the top 40 reasons to doubt the official 911 consp
Reply #81 - Aug 20^th, 2008 at 8:46am

imperial wrote on Aug 20^th, 2008 at 6:13am:

he(s)lian
Quote:

I did find, however, a list of over 1000 structural engineers certified by the Structural Engineering Certification Board, apparently none of whom dispute the well known 9/11 version of events. How do you account for this?

wheres your proof.....show me a LINK....for "1000 structural engineers.."

From the (US) Structural Engineering Certification Board

http://www.secertboard.org/Docs/Listing_by_Name_12-08.pdf

Back to top

Conviction is the art of being certain

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49030
At my desk.

Re: the top 40 reasons to doubt the official 911 consp
Reply #82 - Aug 20^th, 2008 at 9:25am

An explosion that brings down a building, yet here you are arguing that it is logical that the passports survived this explosion.

No Lestat, the explosion did not bring the building down. The fire did. The passports were not in the fire. It's simple really, the explosion sent all the light stuff flying, including passport, the fire destroyed what remained. Don't you recall seeing heaps of paper coming out of the building? It wasn't on fire.

I don't know, maybe because the extreme tempertures created from the explosion

Explosions do not create extreme temperatures (at least not on a large scale), fires do. Did you get your science degree from hollywood?

I don't understand what they were saying? lol.

Correct, otherwise you wouldn't be making these silly claims. Either that, or the signatories are not actually engineers or are simply wrong. Do you know that you can go through an entire engineering degree and not learn anything about fires or explosions? All someone has to do is make up 100 names and claim they have some kind of credentials, and suddenly everyone thinks it's serious. Remember, just because it is written down, doesn't make it true. You still have to think for yourself.

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

imperial

Senior Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 268

Re: the top 40 reasons to doubt the official 911 consp
Reply #83 - Aug 20^th, 2008 at 12:57pm

NorthOfNorth wrote on Aug 20^th, 2008 at 8:46am:

imperial wrote on Aug 20^th, 2008 at 6:13am:

he(s)lian
Quote:

I did find, however, a list of over 1000 structural engineers certified by the Structural Engineering Certification Board, apparently none of whom dispute the well known 9/11 version of events. How do you account for this?

wheres your proof.....show me a LINK....for "1000 structural engineers.."

From the (US) Structural Engineering Certification Board

http://www.secertboard.org/Docs/Listing_by_Name_12-08.pdf

that could be a list of gay engineers......wheres it say anything about 911?????

Back to top

IP Logged

NorthOfNorth

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male

Re: the top 40 reasons to doubt the official 911 consp
Reply #84 - Aug 20^th, 2008 at 3:16pm

imperial wrote on Aug 20^th, 2008 at 12:57pm:

NorthOfNorth wrote on Aug 20^th, 2008 at 8:46am:

imperial wrote on Aug 20^th, 2008 at 6:13am:

he(s)lian
Quote:

I did find, however, a list of over 1000 structural engineers certified by the Structural Engineering Certification Board, apparently none of whom dispute the well known 9/11 version of events. How do you account for this?

wheres your proof.....show me a LINK....for "1000 structural engineers.."

From the (US) Structural Engineering Certification Board

http://www.secertboard.org/Docs/Listing_by_Name_12-08.pdf

wheres it say anything about 911?????

Yes. That's the point, so many structural engineers and thousands more around the world have not questioned the 911 report. Apparently none of those on that list have publicly questioned 911. Nearly all SE's worldwide have not. This would be odd if it was so 'obviously' clear that the towers could not have been brought down by two aircraft hitting the building.
When the entire body or the vast majority of structural engineers stand as one to dispute the 'official line', I will accept their findings.

I am assuming you are not a structural engineer. If this is so then do you have a reason why you choose not to believe the majority of SE's?

I noticed some of the so called experts who question 911 have issues with the US government.

As for theologians and lawyers etc having a clearer insight into 911 by virtue of their profession.....

Back to top

Conviction is the art of being certain

IP Logged

imperial Senior Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 268	Re: the top 40 reasons to doubt the official 911 consp Reply #85 - Aug 20^th, 2008 at 3:20pm so you got nothin.........NEXT.
Back to top	IP Logged

NorthOfNorth Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 17258 Gender:	Re: the top 40 reasons to doubt the official 911 consp Reply #86 - Aug 20^th, 2008 at 6:54pm imperial wrote on Aug 20^th, 2008 at 3:20pm: so you got nothin.........NEXT. Truth seeking requires more than irrational and paranoid commitment to conspiranut theories. This is why you're an idiot.
Back to top	« Last Edit: Aug 20^th, 2008 at 8:23pm by NorthOfNorth » Conviction is the art of being certain IP Logged

imperial Senior Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 268	Re: the top 40 reasons to doubt the official 911 consp Reply #87 - Aug 21^st, 2008 at 2:44am hes lian again.... that the best you got fool?
Back to top	IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 49030 At my desk.	Re: the top 40 reasons to doubt the official 911 consp Reply #88 - Aug 21^st, 2008 at 9:57am Stop the insults please.
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

imperial Senior Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 268	Re: the top 40 reasons to doubt the official 911 consp Reply #89 - Aug 21^st, 2008 at 12:20pm YOU stop the insults admin. i can be civil...why cant you make the slanderous ones civil? because youre a bigot like them.
Back to top	IP Logged