Australian Politics Forum - the top 40 reasons to doubt the official 911 consp

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 49129 At my desk.	Re: the top 40 reasons to doubt the official 911 consp Reply #90 - Aug 21^st, 2008 at 10:18pm If you want to make me do it, I'll ban you. Or, you could just stop insulting people. Quit making it personal.
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

imperial Senior Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 268	who committed 911 ! named !! video Reply #91 - Aug 22^nd, 2008 at 7:07am http://www.911missinglinks.com/
Back to top	IP Logged

imperial

Senior Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 268

Re: who committed 911 ! named !! video
Reply #92 - Aug 22^nd, 2008 at 7:09am

Now you will discover the definitive truth about 9/11 and learn why even the most popular movies on the subject have failed to address the evidence exhaustively presented in this video. The facts will make it abundantly clear that the so-called 9/11 “Truth” movement has been infiltrated and is ultimately controlled by the same criminals who orchestrated the attacks. As they say, 'if you want to control the dissent you lead the dissent.' Culminating evidence from the FBI, CIA, NSA, US Armed Forces Intelligence sectors, Foreign Intelligence organizations, local law enforcement agencies and independent investigators, Missing Links goes where no other 9/11 video has dared to.

Back to top

IP Logged

jordan484

Gold Member

Offline

Genuine Aussie

Posts: 1115

Re: the top 40 reasons to doubt the official 911 consp
Reply #93 - Aug 22^nd, 2008 at 10:15am

A RAGING, long-burning fire caused the collapse of World Trade Centre building number 7, investigators say.

The building tumbled hours after hijacked jets hit the twin towers on September 11, 2001.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology found that the 47-story building, which stood right next to towers 1 and 2, caught fire due to the debris that flew into it after the planes struck.

It eventually fell after seven hours due to instability caused by the fire, not by explosives as some conspiracy theorists have claimed.

"Our study found that the fires in WTC 7, which were uncontrolled but otherwise similar to fires experienced in other tall buildings, caused an extraordinary event,'' said lead investigator Shyam Sunder.

"Heating of floor beams and girders caused a critical support column to fail, initiating a fire-induced progressive collapse that brought the building down,'' he said.

"Video and photographic evidence combined with detailed computer simulations show that neither explosives nor fuel oil fires played a role in the collapse of WTC 7.''

He said debris from tower 1 sparked the blaze on at least 10 floors of the building, which burned for about seven hours while some of its sprinkler systems were non-operational due to a city water main cut.

"We did not find any evidence that explosives were used to bring the building down,'' he said.

"This size blast would have produced an incredibly loud sound that was not recorded on videos of the collapse nor reported by witnesses.''

He said the "collapse was also not due to fires from the substantial amount of diesel fuel stored in the building".

A team of 50 experts from diverse fields, including engineering, explosives, fire, and construction took part in the probe.

The September 11 attacks on New York killed nearly 3000 people.

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,24222887-661,00.html

Back to top

"We should always say that I may refrain from publishing a cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed, but it's because I fear you. Don't for one moment think it's because I respect you." Richard Dawkins

IP Logged

imperial Senior Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 268	Re: the top 40 reasons to doubt the official 911 consp Reply #94 - Aug 22^nd, 2008 at 10:17am wrong section jordan........should be in the fringe...or humour section....
Back to top	IP Logged

jordan484 Gold Member Offline Genuine Aussie Posts: 1115	Re: the top 40 reasons to doubt the official 911 consp Reply #95 - Aug 22^nd, 2008 at 10:21am This is fringe?
Back to top	"We should always say that I may refrain from publishing a cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed, but it's because I fear you. Don't for one moment think it's because I respect you." Richard Dawkins IP Logged

imperial Senior Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 268	Re: the top 40 reasons to doubt the official 911 consp Reply #96 - Aug 22^nd, 2008 at 10:26am the official conspiracy theory is fact for dummies......or humour for the informed....and fringe for those tired of the joke...
Back to top	IP Logged

jordan484 Gold Member Offline Genuine Aussie Posts: 1115	Re: the top 40 reasons to doubt the official 911 consp Reply #97 - Aug 22^nd, 2008 at 10:33am Pardon?
Back to top	"We should always say that I may refrain from publishing a cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed, but it's because I fear you. Don't for one moment think it's because I respect you." Richard Dawkins IP Logged

Lestat

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1403

Re: the top 40 reasons to doubt the official 911 consp
Reply #98 - Aug 22^nd, 2008 at 11:50pm

jordan484 wrote on Aug 22^nd, 2008 at 10:15am:

A RAGING, long-burning fire caused the collapse of World Trade Centre building number 7, investigators say.

The building tumbled hours after hijacked jets hit the twin towers on September 11, 2001.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology found that the 47-story building, which stood right next to towers 1 and 2, caught fire due to the debris that flew into it after the planes struck.

It eventually fell after seven hours due to instability caused by the fire, not by explosives as some conspiracy theorists have claimed.

"Our study found that the fires in WTC 7, which were uncontrolled but otherwise similar to fires experienced in other tall buildings, caused an extraordinary event,'' said lead investigator Shyam Sunder.

"Heating of floor beams and girders caused a critical support column to fail, initiating a fire-induced progressive collapse that brought the building down,'' he said.

"Video and photographic evidence combined with detailed computer simulations show that neither explosives nor fuel oil fires played a role in the collapse of WTC 7.''

He said debris from tower 1 sparked the blaze on at least 10 floors of the building, which burned for about seven hours while some of its sprinkler systems were non-operational due to a city water main cut.

"We did not find any evidence that explosives were used to bring the building down,'' he said.

"This size blast would have produced an incredibly loud sound that was not recorded on videos of the collapse nor reported by witnesses.''

He said the "collapse was also not due to fires from the substantial amount of diesel fuel stored in the building".

A team of 50 experts from diverse fields, including engineering, explosives, fire, and construction took part in the probe.

The September 11 attacks on New York killed nearly 3000 people.

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,24222887-661,00.html

haha...that is one of the most ludicrous things I have ever read. Thanks for the laugh.

You do realise that no steel skyscraper has ever been destroyed by fire. Yes thats right...ever. The amount of heat required to damage the steel beams nearly enough to bring down the whole building would be enormous.

And there are plenty of building closer to the two towers which were not damaged.

Here Jordan....have a read. You might even learn something.

http://www.wtc7.net/

Back to top

IP Logged

jordan484 Gold Member Offline Genuine Aussie Posts: 1115	Re: the top 40 reasons to doubt the official 911 consp Reply #99 - Aug 23^rd, 2008 at 8:41am Why is it ludicrous? How many other buildings have been hit by airplanes of that size with that fuel load?
Back to top	"We should always say that I may refrain from publishing a cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed, but it's because I fear you. Don't for one moment think it's because I respect you." Richard Dawkins IP Logged

easel Gold Member Offline Posts: 3120	Re: the top 40 reasons to doubt the official 911 consp Reply #100 - Aug 24^th, 2008 at 2:53am http://www.ae911truth.org/ Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.
Back to top	I am from a foreign government. This is not a joke. I am authorised to investigate state and federal bodies including ASIO. IP Logged