Australian Politics Forum - different rules for different people

easel

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 3120

Re: different rules for different people
Reply #90 - Oct 16^th, 2008 at 8:00pm

Amadd wrote on Oct 16^th, 2008 at 7:55pm:

So you are the mind reader?
Pray tell, what direction is that?

In your last post you wrote

Amadd wrote on Oct 16^th, 2008 at 7:31pm:

I made it clear that I didn't want to hear comments about the movie from somebody who hasn't watched it.

Quote:

At least you admit it at last that you were attempting to take control over me.

I admit I was refusing to allow you to control the direction of a thread, and if that meant reigning you in, I am guilty as charged.

Do you get it yet? Seriously. I can't see how much further we can analyse my motives here. I have tried and tried and tried. If you can't see where I am coming from, then I give up on you, and for someone as ignorant as you there is no hope, and I welcome you never ever posting in Fringe again.

Back to top

I am from a foreign government. This is not a joke. I am authorised to investigate state and federal bodies including ASIO.

IP Logged

Amadd

Gold Member

Offline

Mo

Posts: 6217

Re: different rules for different people
Reply #91 - Oct 16^th, 2008 at 8:12pm

Well you're making yourself very clear now to me.

1. Abuse of power

2. Assumptions of my intent which you haven't yet outlined.

I had no intent of where the thread was going to go except that I wanted to discuss it with somebody who had watched it. BTW, you could've watched it 10 times over by now without this difference of opinion Grin

I don't know if you think that I was going to dig up the Jesus debate again, but there really isn't too much about that in the movie.
That wasn't my intention when I posted a thread in the Spirituality forum either.

Back to top

IP Logged

easel

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 3120

Re: different rules for different people
Reply #92 - Oct 16^th, 2008 at 8:19pm

Amadd wrote on Oct 16^th, 2008 at 8:12pm:

Well you're making yourself very clear now to me.

1. Abuse of power

2. Assumptions of my intent which you haven't yet outlined.

I had no intent of where the thread was going to go except that I wanted to discuss it with somebody who had watched it. BTW, you could've watched it 10 times over by now without this difference of opinion Grin

I don't know if you think that I was going to dig up the Jesus debate again, but there really isn't too much about that in the movie.
That wasn't my intention when I posted a thread in the Spirituality forum either.

Ok Amadd.

Assumptions of your intent? You CLEARLY wrote

Quote:

I made it clear that I didn't want to hear comments about the movie from somebody who hasn't watched it.

and you expect me to believe your intent was to not stifle free speech (something you are allegedly against) unless someone was familiar with your doctrine? You would have been perfect for the Politburo, "I can't discuss this with you even if you are familiar with it because you were not there during the secret meetings."

I have mentioned things other than the Jesus debate, more than once, in relation to the topic at hand, have you neglected to read those posts?

How much clearer does this need to be? Drop the solipsism, it is doing you no favours.

It's moments like these you need minties.

Back to top

I am from a foreign government. This is not a joke. I am authorised to investigate state and federal bodies including ASIO.

IP Logged

Amadd Gold Member Offline Mo Posts: 6217	Re: different rules for different people Reply #93 - Oct 16^th, 2008 at 8:22pm Well what is it that you didn't want me to discuss? Quote: It's moments like these that you need minties I thought you said minutes
Back to top	IP Logged

easel

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 3120

Re: different rules for different people
Reply #94 - Oct 16^th, 2008 at 8:26pm

Amadd wrote on Oct 16^th, 2008 at 8:22pm:

Well what is it that you didn't want me to discuss?

Quote:

It's moments like these that you need minties

I thought you said minutes Grin

I don't care what you discuss, I enjoy having a debate and a disagreement, it expands your mind rather than just agreeing on whatever.

I do care if you say people cannot discuss something. Like I said, if you made a thread on a movie, say Pulp Fiction and refused to discuss it with anyone who hadn't seen it, no problem, but if you saw a movie on giant squid and I read a book on giant squid, and you refused to discuss giant squid with me, you would be an idiot.

That is all.

End of discussion.

I am endlessly repeating myself and it is pointless.

Back to top

I am from a foreign government. This is not a joke. I am authorised to investigate state and federal bodies including ASIO.

IP Logged

Amadd

Gold Member

Offline

Mo

Posts: 6217

Re: different rules for different people
Reply #95 - Oct 16^th, 2008 at 8:44pm

Well put it in the category of Pulp Fiction (not as good of course) if it makes more sense to you that way. You and FD were like the blind leading the blind. You were explaining what you thought of the first one and what you think the second one is about.

There is absolutely no way that I could have a discussion about the movie with you in regards to my interest.

But I'm happy that you've now admitted that you were usurping control.
Thanks for that.
Better the devil you know.

Back to top

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49003
At my desk.

Re: different rules for different people
Reply #96 - Oct 16^th, 2008 at 8:48pm

Amadd wrote on Oct 16^th, 2008 at 4:39pm:

Yes, and you supplied a "Feedback Board".
I'm giving you feedback as to what one of your mods. is up to.
If you're not interested then why supply it at all?

That's not what the feedback board is for. I even put this in the rules, because I knew people would get all wound up over nothing. If you have any more complaints about a moderator censoring you, my official response is 'I don't care, bugger off.' Get over it Amadd and stop bringing it up here.

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

Amadd Gold Member Offline Mo Posts: 6217	Re: different rules for different people Reply #97 - Oct 16^th, 2008 at 8:54pm Why would I bother with a board which doesn't respect freedom of speech in the first place? It's a joke
Back to top	IP Logged

Amadd Gold Member Offline Mo Posts: 6217	Re: different rules for different people Reply #98 - Oct 16^th, 2008 at 8:59pm Now go ahead and ban me proving that I am in the right. It's the Aussie way y'know?
Back to top	IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 49003 At my desk.	Re: different rules for different people Reply #99 - Oct 16^th, 2008 at 9:20pm Amadd wrote on Oct 16^th, 2008 at 8:54pm: Why would I bother with a board which doesn't respect freedom of speech in the first place? It's a joke That's the spirit Amadd. Can you feel the weight shifting off your shoulders already?
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged