Daniel wrote on Nov 13
th, 2008 at 9:41pm:
Grendel wrote on Nov 13
th, 2008 at 9:37pm:
Well I think you are paranoid and delusional.
It would be nice to get answers to everything asked for a change and drop the smokescreens and victim-hood crap.
It would be nice not to be threatened and censored and banned for dissent or asking what appears to be questions to difficult for you to face.
Abbreviations eh Daniel.. well who'd a thunk...
Well, I could have told him to go to google, but either way.
I haven't seen any questions to answer. So, I'm hardly running away from anything because it's 'difficult to face', nor am I playing the victim. I'm merely pointing out what I've noticed for Soren's patterns on other forums.
paranoid and delusional? Why? Cause you don't agree with me? Absurd stuff, ladies and gentlemen...
Quote:Well, put it down to my incorrigible ignorance.
Old dog and all that.
Prove me wrong, Soren.
You didn't even address why you shouldn't call us 'Mohammadans'...
Mohammedan points to the founder and the man followed. The term also paarallels 'Christian'.
It is a declension also used in other religious and non-religious group identifiers such as Methodist, Marxist, Anarchist and so forth.
It is no more insulting than any of these. Is there any insult in being identified as a partisan, a follower of Mohammed?
It is certainly not as insulting as the terms used by Mohammedans to denote the 'out' groups (me among them) - infidel, kuffr and so on.
Language can reveal as well as conceal. I am concious of its unveiling power. Your squirming uncomfortably only confirms it.