Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 
Send Topic Print
pbuh (Read 12438 times)
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: pbuh
Reply #45 - Nov 15th, 2008 at 12:39pm
 
Sam wrote on Nov 15th, 2008 at 10:46am:
it would be pretty tedius to write it in full every time his name was mentioned, pbuh. (I also sometimes use the abbreviated (s) for the above, and the MV forums has a "smiley" with the full arabic text).



Exactly - the tedium of ostentatious piety. It is bored and impatient to be really pious but it wants to appear pious. It is nothing but show-making.



ting bog mit mog.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.
Re: pbuh
Reply #46 - Nov 15th, 2008 at 12:47pm
 
When people say Saint Paul, they are not necessarily indicating they respect the guy. Rather it is a way of indicating who they are talking to. Thus, if there was a chance of ambiguity, then pbuh, though tedious, would serve a useful function in language, in the same way as saying Muhammed the prophet to distinguish him from Muhammed Ali. However, beyond that it is a useless, repetitive phrase that is no different to adding 'I am a Muslim' to the end of every sentence. Islam does not require it. It is part of the cultural baggage that Tariq Ramadan would identify as separate from the religion and of no value.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: pbuh
Reply #47 - Nov 15th, 2008 at 12:49pm
 
freediver wrote on Nov 15th, 2008 at 12:47pm:
When people say Saint Paul, they are not necessarily indicating they respect the guy. Rather it is a way of indicating who they are talking to. Thus, if there was a chance of ambiguity, then pbuh, though tedious, would serve a useful function in language, in the same way as saying Muhammed the prophet to distinguish him from Muhammed Ali. However, beyond that it is a useless, repetitive phrase that is no different to adding 'I am a Muslim' to the end of every sentence. Islam does not require it. It is part of the cultural baggage that Tariq Ramadan would identify as separate from the religion and of no value.



And they all said amen to that.

Sorry, some said ameen.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: pbuh
Reply #48 - Nov 15th, 2008 at 3:21pm
 
freediver wrote on Nov 15th, 2008 at 12:47pm:
When people say Saint Paul, they are not necessarily indicating they respect the guy. Rather it is a way of indicating who they are talking to. Thus, if there was a chance of ambiguity, then pbuh, though tedious, would serve a useful function in language, in the same way as saying Muhammed the prophet to distinguish him from Muhammed Ali. However, beyond that it is a useless, repetitive phrase that is no different to adding 'I am a Muslim' to the end of every sentence. Islam does not require it. It is part of the cultural baggage that Tariq Ramadan would identify as separate from the religion and of no value.

Don't you think its a bit on the arrogant side for a non Muslim to presume to instruct a Muslim on how he should address prophets when mentioning them in text or conversation?
Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.
Re: pbuh
Reply #49 - Nov 15th, 2008 at 3:23pm
 
What instructions am I giving?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
abu_rashid
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Aussie Muslim

Posts: 8353
Re: pbuh
Reply #50 - Nov 15th, 2008 at 4:07pm
 
freediver,

Quote:
If the english word 'poobah' came to mean 'peace be upon him' then you could say that instead, right?


Since we're not talking about saying anything, only writing, I'll just ignore this ridiculous comment.

Please stick with the program freediver, I know it's hard when your attention span is a little short, but please do try.

Quote:
Not exactly, it is a conversion to a different form.


Yes, but a symbolic form, which indicates some kind of abbreviation has occured. Otherwise we'd have about 2000 characters to represent each sound, if we were to encode them as they actually are.

Quote:
If someone says CSIRO, then that is an abbreviation. Going from saying it to writing it adds complexity.


Speech to text reduces complexity freediver. A sound is made up of thousands of bits of information, a single character is represented in just 1 (or in computers 8 bits, but for our purposes each character is just a single piece of information, that represents a complex sound).

Quote:
An alphabet encodes sounds, not concepts... ...The symbols represent sounds, not meanings.


Right, and if you read back I mentioned the concepts->sounds->text relationship earlier on.

Quote:
So I don't really see the difference between using the abbreviation in writing and using it in sound.


That's fine, and on a basic level I don't either.

Quote:
We don't have any funny rules that you can write CSIRO but you have to pronounce it fully.


Yeh well as you've come to know freediver, Islam is all about funny and bizarre rules which the rest of humanity just can't relate to. So no surprises there.

Quote:
Not all of us have. It took me a while to figure it out. I had to ask I think. There are plenty of guests and 'drive by' members who would have no idea what you are on about.


That's irrelevant, because we say it as an act of worship, not to convey a meaning to you. So it doesn't really matter if you recognise what it is or not, but I do remember explaining it when I first began here.

Quote:
It reminds me of people who use text style writing on forums (eg l8 for late). When you get kids on forums doing that sort of thing, they usually get criticised for it.


That's different as it's actually part of their message to you, and they expect you to comprehend it. I don't expect you to comprehend "pbuh".

Quote:
When I read CSIRO, I decode it into five letters, not five words.


Irrelevant to what I said. I stated "peace be upon him" gets decoded by humans back into the seventeen sounds.

Quote:
I don't see that as disrespectful to the scientists who work there.


Relevance to this conversation?
Back to top
 
abu_rashid  
IP Logged
 
abu_rashid
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Aussie Muslim

Posts: 8353
Re: pbuh
Reply #51 - Nov 15th, 2008 at 4:11pm
 
soren,

Quote:
Exactly - the tedium of ostentatious piety. It is bored and impatient to be really pious but it wants to appear pious. It is nothing but show-making.


It is a prayer to God, so it really has nothing to do with you. You are not intended to comprehend nor analyse the contents of someones heart who says/writes/abbreviates it. So quite frankly your opinion is worth squat.
Back to top
 
abu_rashid  
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: pbuh
Reply #52 - Nov 15th, 2008 at 4:30pm
 
abu_rashid wrote on Nov 15th, 2008 at 4:11pm:
soren,

Quote:
Exactly - the tedium of ostentatious piety. It is bored and impatient to be really pious but it wants to appear pious. It is nothing but show-making.


It is a prayer to God, so it really has nothing to do with you. You are not intended to comprehend nor analyse the contents of someones heart who says/writes/abbreviates it. So quite frankly your opinion is worth squat.



Don't subject your non-muslim interlocutors like me to it if it is a prayer to god.  God knows what is in your heart and I find the pseudo-pious burping ostentatious and false.
In the mosque, among your co-religionists - whatever gets you through the meeting. But spare those who obviously do not share your private convictions. It is intrusive and so rude. It is very un-convivial.
I'll call you muslim if you stop it on this forum.





Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
abu_rashid
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Aussie Muslim

Posts: 8353
Re: pbuh
Reply #53 - Nov 15th, 2008 at 4:36pm
 
Quote:
Don't subject your non-muslim interlocutors like me to it if it is a prayer to god.


If you don't like it, feel free to exit the thread, or the forum. Nobody is forcing you to be here... having to listen to it.

Quote:
God knows what is in your heart


What is in the heart must express itself, or it isn't really in there is it? Just the idea of it is. Kind of like Christianity and all the golden rule stuff, sounds nice in theory, but very little of it is translated into practise... no doubt because you think God knows what's in your heart, and that's enough.

Quote:
It is intrusive and so rude. Its is very un-convivial.


Fine, exit the thread, and the forum, if this is your feeling.

Au revoir.
Back to top
 
abu_rashid  
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: pbuh
Reply #54 - Nov 15th, 2008 at 4:47pm
 
abu_rashid wrote on Nov 15th, 2008 at 4:36pm:
What is in the heart must express itself, or it isn't really in there is it?


This is right.


But pbuh expresses that there is only a shorthand in your heart. Instead of bowing, you just doff your cap.




The rest of your post is infected with resentment. Still, I hope you are getting the desired hot flushes of rightousness.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.
Re: pbuh
Reply #55 - Nov 15th, 2008 at 4:56pm
 
Quote:
Since we're not talking about saying anything, only writing, I'll just ignore this ridiculous comment.


I was talking about speach as well as writing. I was trying to make an important point, a point that holds regardless of whether it is in speech or writing.

Quote:
That's irrelevant, because we say it as an act of worship, not to convey a meaning to you.


An abbreviated act of worship? Like posting "cya l8r gd"? Is God supposed to be impressed with the little shortcuts? Is this the same concept as prayer flags?

If Islam is mostly rule based, but does not require this act of worship, but you do it anyway, but then you abbreviate it because you can't be bothered doing it properly, but no-one else needs to understand it anyway, isn't that getting a bit convoluted? Why not just say it but not post it? It reminds me those those guys in robes who walk round chanting and hitting themselves on the forhead with blocks of wood. It's an outwardly compulsive act of no value that has replaced something internal.

Quote:
What is in the heart must express itself, or it isn't really in there is it?


Is it really there if you can only be bothered expressing it in acronym form?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: pbuh
Reply #56 - Nov 15th, 2008 at 4:58pm
 
Another pointless thread bumbles on to futility.
Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: pbuh
Reply #57 - Nov 15th, 2008 at 5:07pm
 
NorthOfNorth wrote on Nov 15th, 2008 at 4:58pm:
Another pointless thread bumbles on to futility.

Hell, Ian, don't they all?!?!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: pbuh
Reply #58 - Nov 15th, 2008 at 5:10pm
 
Soren wrote on Nov 15th, 2008 at 5:07pm:
NorthOfNorth wrote on Nov 15th, 2008 at 4:58pm:
Another pointless thread bumbles on to futility.

Hell, Ian, don't they all?!?!

Not all, but some more than others... Sore N!!
Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.
Re: pbuh
Reply #59 - Nov 15th, 2008 at 5:25pm
 
Isn't it disrespectful to your audience to populate your writing with acronyms you do not intend them to understand?

A lot of people are quite vocal in their criticism of the unnecessary use of technical or unfamiliar acronyms, and justifiably so. But even in that case the author does generally expect the audience to understand. He does it more out of ignorance (of the ignorance of others).
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 
Send Topic Print