Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Send Topic Print
A Question of Faith. (Read 9322 times)
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: A Question of Faith.
Reply #30 - Dec 6th, 2008 at 4:45pm
 
Yadda wrote on Dec 6th, 2008 at 3:27pm:
helian,

Should we embrace [spiritual] darkness, out of seeking to express kindness, in our nature?

What about [spiritual] light and [spiritual] darkness?

Is it a moral act to give a lamb to a wolf, out of kindness, because the wolf seems lonely?

Should we surrender that which is innocent, to that which we know is evil?

Should evil and innocence have equivalency in our personal reality?

I assume you are referring to the dialogue I quoted above. Islam is that which you believe to be evil, the child is the innocent. If that is so, then you’re begging the question, so I will leave that one for you to answer the only way the premises will allow.

My point about the dialogue is that the most sincere practise of religion is extremely difficult.

The true practice of a philosophy or theology of compassion requires that you be prepared to abnegate your instinct towards revenge or wrong action even if it is easier or ‘feels more right’ to act according to other drives.

A theology of compassion requires that you surrender the will to seek revenge and the impulse to diminish the lives of others you despise to satisfy one’s ego. It demands that you empathise with the suffering of others and seek to relieve it whenever you can. It demands that you uphold the dignity of the other (hence Ghandi’s suggestion that the devout Hindu raise the child in the faith that was his birthright).

That you seek common ground with your enemies by ‘building bridges and not walls’.

That the practice of compassion leads to self-respect which will lead to the revelation that all respect is self-respect.
Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
Calanen
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2241
Re: A Question of Faith.
Reply #31 - Dec 6th, 2008 at 5:44pm
 
NorthOfNorth wrote on Dec 6th, 2008 at 4:45pm:
Yadda wrote on Dec 6th, 2008 at 3:27pm:
helian,

Should we embrace [spiritual] darkness, out of seeking to express kindness, in our nature?

What about [spiritual] light and [spiritual] darkness?

Is it a moral act to give a lamb to a wolf, out of kindness, because the wolf seems lonely?

Should we surrender that which is innocent, to that which we know is evil?

Should evil and innocence have equivalency in our personal reality?

I assume you are referring to the dialogue I quoted above. Islam is that which you believe to be evil, the child is the innocent. If that is so, then you’re begging the question, so I will leave that one for you to answer the only way the premises will allow.

My point about the dialogue is that the most sincere practise of religion is extremely difficult.

The true practice of a philosophy or theology of compassion requires that you be prepared to abnegate your instinct towards revenge or wrong action even if it is easier or ‘feels more right’ to act according to other drives.

A theology of compassion requires that you surrender the will to seek revenge and the impulse to diminish the lives of others you despise to satisfy one’s ego. It demands that you empathise with the suffering of others and seek to relieve it whenever you can. It demands that you uphold the dignity of the other (hence Ghandi’s suggestion that the devout Hindu raise the child in the faith that was his birthright).

That you seek common ground with your enemies by ‘building bridges and not walls’.

That the practice of compassion leads to self-respect which will lead to the revelation that all respect is self-respect.


Ghandi's ideas worked fine when you had someone moderately reasonable like the British to try them out on. Ghandi also recommended that the Jews try the same thing with Herr Hitler.

Didn't work out so well for them.

People that want you dead, because their 'God' says you have to die, dont care how compassionate you are, how understanding you are, how morally right or pious you are. You are just infidels who have rejected the truth of Allah, the worst crime a human can commit.  If you are Jewish or Christian and unconditionally surrender to islamic rule - you live. If you are anyone else, or do anything else - you die.

Forget about compassion. We need the West's warriors front and centre.
Back to top
 

Quote:
ISLAM is a vicious [un-reformable] political tyranny, which has always murdered its critics, and it continues that practice even today.
Yadda
 
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Moderator
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 40755
Gender: male
Re: A Question of Faith.
Reply #32 - Dec 6th, 2008 at 9:02pm
 

calanen - hahha, that's a great post.
Yes, it's a sign of an evolved society to be reasonable, just and considerate.

But to unreasonable, inconsiderate, intoleratant people, they will run you over without even asking.
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: A Question of Faith.
Reply #33 - Dec 6th, 2008 at 9:05pm
 
Calanen wrote on Dec 6th, 2008 at 5:44pm:
Ghandi's ideas worked fine when you had someone moderately reasonable like the British to try them out on. Ghandi also recommended that the Jews try the same thing with Herr Hitler.

Didn't work out so well for them.

People that want you dead, because their 'God' says you have to die, dont care how compassionate you are, how understanding you are, how morally right or pious you are. You are just infidels who have rejected the truth of Allah, the worst crime a human can commit.  If you are Jewish or Christian and unconditionally surrender to islamic rule - you live. If you are anyone else, or do anything else - you die.

Forget about compassion. We need the West's warriors front and centre.

I suppose the obvious thing is that whenever you resort to violence, justified or not, it’s highly unlikely, by that act, you’re practising a philosophy or theology of compassion.

If you were, then the imperative to ‘love’ or find common ground with your enemies should mean that when you have the opportunity to build bridges, you take it. So, any time you are not physically at war with your ‘neighbours’, you would be required to seek dialogue with them in aid of developing trust and mutual respect. You should not seek to satisfy a bloodlust or revenge by imagining or planning their gruesome deaths.
Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: A Question of Faith.
Reply #34 - Dec 6th, 2008 at 9:07pm
 
Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 6th, 2008 at 9:02pm:
But to unreasonable, inconsiderate, intoleratant people, they will run you over without even asking.

As I suspect may be true of you.
Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Moderator
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 40755
Gender: male
Re: A Question of Faith.
Reply #35 - Dec 6th, 2008 at 9:32pm
 

helian - I accept criticism of christian churches, christianity, spirituality, kiwis, gardeners, cyclists  or of myself.

I do not accept anyones freedom of speech being quashed.

Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: A Question of Faith.
Reply #36 - Dec 6th, 2008 at 9:45pm
 
Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 6th, 2008 at 9:32pm:
helian - I accept criticism of christian churches, christianity, spirituality, kiwis, gardeners, cyclists  or of myself.

I do not accept anyones freedom of speech being quashed.


I'm sure. Particularly when the 'free speech' is advocating hate and intolerance towards those you don't like.

Seriously Sprint, when was the last time you were run over by unreasonable, inconsiderate, intolerant people whether they asked you or not?

You display the characteristics of all that is contemptible in Christianity, a theology of compassion. You're a scripture quoting hypocrite who barely wastes a second praising the denigration of those you despise. The more inflammatory the post, the more you encourage it.

I doubt it's the opportunity to practice compassion that you look for... More the chance to be accepted by a wider group, even compromising your beliefs to do it.

Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Moderator
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 40755
Gender: male
Re: A Question of Faith.
Reply #37 - Dec 7th, 2008 at 12:18am
 
helian - feel free to post antichristian sentiments here.
They won't get deleted, you won't get banned, you won't get threatened with legalaction by me.

the last time I got run over by intolerant people was the last time I was in MV.

I'm a bit confused by the rest of your posting. That's fine.
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21786
A cat with a view
Re: A Question of Faith.
Reply #38 - Dec 7th, 2008 at 6:16am
 
NorthOfNorth wrote on Dec 6th, 2008 at 4:45pm:
I assume you are referring to the dialogue I quoted above. Islam is that which you believe to be evil, the child is the innocent. If that is so, then you’re begging the question, so I will leave that one for you to answer the only way the premises will allow.

My point about the dialogue is that the most sincere practise of religion is extremely difficult.

The true practice of a philosophy or theology of compassion requires that you be prepared to abnegate your instinct towards revenge or wrong action even if it is easier or ‘feels more right’ to act according to other drives.

A theology of compassion requires that you surrender the will to seek revenge and the impulse to diminish the lives of others you despise to satisfy one’s ego. It demands that you empathise with the suffering of others and seek to relieve it whenever you can. It demands that you uphold the dignity of the other (hence Ghandi’s suggestion that the devout Hindu raise the child in the faith that was his birthright).

That you seek common ground with your enemies by ‘building bridges and not walls’.

That the practice of compassion leads to self-respect which will lead to the revelation that all respect is self-respect.



helian,

Thank you for your considered reply.




Does TRUTH have an equal place, alongside compassion?

Considering the example from the movie again,

Let me put it another way,

A man [the Hindu] says,
....."I've done a terrible thing, i've killed a child. I'm going to Hell."

In response, the movie 'Ghandi' says, "You have done done a terrible thing. But atonement for the evil you have done is available."
....by raising a child in a hateful philosophy, to believe that he can kill people, if they refuse to worship, or submit to, his god.

Of the two men above, who is the man further along the path to enlightenment?

Is it the one who [repenting,] acknowledges that he has done a terrible thing, and acknowledges that he deserves to go to hell for his sin?

Or is it the one who counsels, that though a person has done a terrible thing, he will not go to hell, if he will atone for his own sins?
.....And atonement takes the form of teaching a child a hateful philosophy, which condones the murder of those who will not submit, to that philosophy.
.....[can you imagine, that Ghandi, a man on the path, didn't know what ISLAM teaches / promotes among its adherent's? I find that difficult to believe.]





++++++++


But perhaps Ghandi's ignorance of ISLAM is not so far fetched???


Dalai Lama Defends Islam As Peaceful Religion
13 July, 2008

http://www.dalailama.com/news.274.htm


If on first blink, you really, really, believe this assertion, from noble and wise Buddhist, the Dalai Lama,
.....read up on the history of Buddhism in Afghanistan,

"Buddhism in Afghanistan has a long history. Many monuments, such as the famous Buddhas of Bamyan, testify to the Buddhist culture in Afghanistan. It was during Ashoka's reign that Buddhism was introduced to what later became Afghanistan.....Many of the Iranian forebearers of the Pashtuns, including the Scythians followed Buddhism UNTIL THE ARRIVAL OF ISLAM. Currently, there are a few Buddhists in Afghanistan, PROBABLY NUMBERING 0.3% OF THIS ISLAMIC COUNTRY."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhism_in_Afghanistan


Google,
Buddhism afghanistan
http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=Bu...





If true religion, is the [a] search for TRUTH....

And if Buddhism is a religion based on TRUTH....

If the Dalai Lama then comes out, and asserts ISLAM is a peaceful religion, then i would suggest, that for the Dalai Lama to make such a statement [in the face of irrefutable facts to the contrary], the Dalai Lama is clearly telling an un-truth.

And this circumstance [the 'broadcasting' of this un-truth to the world], i would suggest, is probably because the Dalai Lama HAS AN AGENDA, which is not  being revealed.

Why not???

And what is that agenda???

And, are these at all improper questions, which i pose???




And i ask, that if the Dalai Lama is portrayed as a wise, truth speaker, why would such a man promote such an obvious falsehood to the world?

It seems that once again [in our PC dominated world],

BLACK IS WHITE, AND WHITE IS BLACK.
UP IS DOWN, AND DOWN IS UP.


Where will all of these lies, all end up?

Where will they take us?

For a possible answer to that Q.,
.....look at Afghanistan today.



"And what is good, Phaedrus, and what is not good - need we ask anyone to tell us these things?"

Zen And The Art Of Motorcycle Maintenance
Robert M Pirsig


Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: A Question of Faith.
Reply #39 - Dec 7th, 2008 at 8:35am
 
Yadda wrote on Dec 7th, 2008 at 6:16am:
helian,

Thank you for your considered reply.

Does TRUTH have an equal place, alongside compassion?

That’s an ancient philosophical question, that one : Which is greater, the good or the true?

My personal belief: Not all knowable things are good to know. Wisdom is the ability to discern one from the other.

Yadda wrote on Dec 7th, 2008 at 6:16am:
Considering the example from the movie again,

Let me put it another way,

A man [the Hindu] says,
....."I've done a terrible thing, i've killed a child. I'm going to Hell."

In response, the movie 'Ghandi' says, "You have done done a terrible thing. But atonement for the evil you have done is available."
....by raising a child in a hateful philosophy, to believe that he can kill people, if they refuse to worship, or submit to, his god.

Of the two men above, who is the man further along the path to enlightenment?

Is it the one who [repenting,] acknowledges that he has done a terrible thing, and acknowledges that he deserves to go to hell for his sin?

Or is it the one who counsels, that though a person has done a terrible thing, he will not go to hell, if he will atone for his own sins?
.....And atonement takes the form of teaching a child a hateful philosophy, which condones the murder of those who will not submit, to that philosophy.
.....[can you imagine, that Ghandi, a man on the path, didn't know what ISLAM teaches / promotes among its adherent's? I find that difficult to believe.]

Again, you’re begging the question. It’s not at all universally agreed that every Muslim believes he has a right to murder anyone who will not submit to Islam, in the same way that not all Christians believe you will be damned for all eternity if you do not embrace Christianity (although some still do), so your question is invalid.

As you are an adherent of a theology of compassion, which requires that you accept forgiveness of sins and atonement for wrong doing as the path to redemption, the answer to who is further along the path to enlightenment should be obvious to you.  

Yadda wrote on Dec 7th, 2008 at 6:16am:
But perhaps Ghandi's ignorance of ISLAM is not so far fetched???

Dalai Lama Defends Islam As Peaceful Religion
13 July, 2008

http://www.dalailama.com/news.274.htm

If on first blink, you really, really, believe this assertion, from noble and wise Buddhist, the Dalai Lama,
.....read up on the history of Buddhism in Afghanistan,

If true religion, is the [a] search for TRUTH....

And if Buddhism is a religion based on TRUTH....

If the Dalai Lama then comes out, and asserts ISLAM is a peaceful religion, then i would suggest, that for the Dalai Lama to make such a statement [in the face of irrefutable facts to the contrary], the Dalai Lama is clearly telling an un-truth.

And this circumstance [the 'broadcasting' of this un-truth to the world], i would suggest, is probably because the Dalai Lama HAS AN AGENDA, which is not being revealed.

Why not???

And what is that agenda???

And i ask, that if the Dalai Lama is portrayed as a wise, truth speaker, why would such a man promote such an obvious falsehood to the world?

I cannot say what the Dalai Lama thinks and neither can you. I would suggest, however, that the Dalai Lama has been in significant dialogue over decades with many respected Islamic theologians as he has with very senior Christian clerics of many denominations including Pope John Paul II, which would no doubt afford him a deep insight into the essential truths of these faiths.

You have presumed he is lying because he does not believe what you want to believe.

In Tibetan Buddhist tradition, His Holiness the Dalai Lama is considered to be the reincarnation of Chenrezig, the bodhisattva of Compassion. I’m sure he would consider his agenda to be the advocating of compassion towards all sentient beings – promoting a Buddhist version of ‘Love thy neighbour as yourself’ or Hillel’s golden rule ‘That which is hateful to you, do not do to others’.

Yadda wrote on Dec 7th, 2008 at 6:16am:
"And what is good, Phaedrus, and what is not good - need we ask anyone to tell us these things?"

Zen And The Art Of Motorcycle Maintenance
Robert M Pirsig

Pirsig’s quote suggests that you don’t need religion to know what is good or not good, true or untrue, right or wrong. So do you believe religion is unnecessary as a moral guide? If you do then perhaps you are further down the path towards atheism than you realise.

Back to top
« Last Edit: Dec 7th, 2008 at 10:25am by NorthOfNorth »  

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: A Question of Faith.
Reply #40 - Dec 7th, 2008 at 9:02am
 
Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 7th, 2008 at 12:18am:
helian - feel free to post antichristian sentiments here.
They won't get deleted, you won't get banned, you won't get threatened with legalaction by me.

the last time I got run over by intolerant people was the last time I was in MV.

I'm a bit confused by the rest of your posting. That's fine.

I don’t intend to post anti-Christian sentiments for the sake of gratuitous denigration. I don’t believe the Jesus myth is true, but I believe that the message can be rescued from religiosity.

Islam, like all religious expression, does not stand up to close scrutiny. Religious legends and stories are all hopelessly flawed with inconsistencies and absurdities. But if as an atheist you went to the Vatican with the goal of enlightening the Pope, Cardinals and minor clergy to the inconsistencies inherent in Christian dogma or perhaps the atrocities committed in the name of Jesus, you’d soon be shown the door and not because these ancient clerics aren’t up for debate.

Given your intransigent hostility towards Islam and the utter disrespect you display towards all Muslims, I’m not surprised you get a hard time at MV. Nobody likes to be treated with contempt or to have their deeply held beliefs derided. No doubt you start up there like a drunk in a church raving at everyone that Islam is this and that. Follow the dictates of your faith, Sprint. Build bridges not walls and don’t kid yourself that denigrating the faith and beliefs of those you wish to engage in dialogue is bridge building.

I don’t think you are confused at all about the rest of my posting, that’s why you haven’t asked me to clarify what I mean.


Back to top
« Last Edit: Dec 7th, 2008 at 10:23am by NorthOfNorth »  

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
mozzaok
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 6741
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: A Question of Faith.
Reply #41 - Dec 7th, 2008 at 9:37am
 
I have to agree with Helian on the issue of the Dalai Lama's interpretation, and expression of his views of Islam, and certainly, I reject the opinion that he is not telling the truth on this subject.

Seemingly contradictorally, I also agree with Yadda's interpretation of Islam.

So we have two diametrically opposing views on the subject and both are true and accurate, just dependant on which iteration of the religion we focus on.

As Helian says, we should assume that the Dalai Lama has formed his opinions, from discussion with Islamic scholars, on what is the true interpretation of Islam, whilst Yadda and people like myself, gather our ideas from media reports of Islamist extremism, and it's effective hijacking of the muslim ummah into a much more violent and extremist interpretation of what is taught in the Koran.

Islam is very much at the crossroad, and the state of flux is contibuting to a perception of fear and mistrust of it, amongst the broader community.

In this environment it certainly does no harm for some to point out, that like all religions, it has very strong messages of peace and love as part of it's philosophy, and we should be supporting those from the Islamic community who choose to promote those elements, rather than the messages of hatred and oppression that we see from the extremist elements.

We cannot afford to let those voices of hate drown out others who seek to champion Islam's good points.

Back to top
 

OOPS!!! My Karma, ran over your Dogma!
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: A Question of Faith.
Reply #42 - Dec 7th, 2008 at 11:42am
 
Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 7th, 2008 at 12:18am:
the last time I got run over by intolerant people was the last time I was in MV.



If only you put as much energy into loving and respecting your fellow human beings as you put into hating Muslims.

All religious people are intolerant when you attack the central tenets of their religion.

I don't know if you go to a church or not, but if somebody stood up during a religious sermon and started making assertions that Jesus Christ was married to Mary Magdalen and had a child called Sarah, maybe somebody might rather intolerantly arrange for him to be thrown out.

In the same way, if somebody started denigrating cats at a cat show, by loudly demonstrating and saying that they should all be put down because they destroy Australian Wildlife, then just maybe he might be expelled too.

So, it might just be a tad difficult for you to understand this, but criticising Mohammed as being some kind of feral pedophile who murdered people might just maybe elicit a similar response from a Muslim group. Do you think they might possibly be offended, or consider you to be a (perish the thought) lunatic?
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21786
A cat with a view
Re: A Question of Faith.
Reply #43 - Dec 7th, 2008 at 3:15pm
 
NorthOfNorth wrote on Dec 7th, 2008 at 8:35am:
It’s not at all universally agreed that every Muslim believes he has a right to murder anyone who will not submit to Islam,.....



helian,

You may wish to believe this [above].

But you [and many others] are mistaken.

Here is the TRUTH folks.....

Every real muslim believes he has a right to murder those, who refuse to submit to ISLAM.
....and i can back that up with many Koran, and Hadith quotes.

The Hadith...

Allah's Apostle was asked, "What is the best deed?" He replied, "To believe in Allah and His Apostle (Muhammad). The questioner then asked, "What is the next (in goodness)? He replied, "To participate in Jihad (religious fighting) in Allah's Cause."
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/002.sbt.html#001.0...


helian,

ISLAMIC texts, and the authorised schools of ISLAMIC jurisprudence, determine who is, and is not, a muslim.

Not you.

ISLAM itself, defines who is a muslim.

And to be muslim, a person must accept the doctrines of ISLAM,
....which insist that it is 'legal', to murder anyone who will not submit to ISLAM, and anyone who renounces his faith [in ISLAM], and allows muslims to deceive those non-muslims who are too strong [atm] to subjugate.
....THOSE ARE FACTS.
....and within that definition of, 'anyone' [who can leagally be killed], is also included ppl who call themselves muslims, but live an un-ISLAMIC lifestyle.



helian,

Do you really believe the assurances of ppl in Australia [who call themselves muslims], about what they describe as the tolerant beliefs of 'true' muslims?

How gullible are you?

Huh

ISLAM demands total intolerance of the Jahiliyya [un-ISLAMIC] lifestyle - among muslims.

A pronouncement against Jahiliyya, from an ISLAMIC site,

"THE RIGHT TO JUDGE"
"It is not the function of Islam to compromise with the concepts of Jahiliyya which are current in the world or to co-exist in the same land together with a jahili system........"
by SAYYID QUTB

http://www.islamworld.net/justice.html


EXAMPLES, of enforcement [against Jahiliyya] in Sharia jurisdictions....

Iraq,

March 23, 2005
Death at 'immoral' picnic in the park
Students are beaten to death for playing music as Shia militiamen run amok
.....In Basra.....Islamic militias already are beginning to apply their own version of that law [Sharia], without authority from above or any challenge from the police.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/iraq/article434762.ece

Same circumstances, in Iran,
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6557679.stm


"....Jahiliyya is a result of the lack of Sharia law, without which Islam cannot exist;"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jahiliyya#Jahiliyya_in_contemporary_society


helian,

You seem willingly ignorant, about what behaviour ISLAM condones.

Another recent example [in a place where real muslims feel able to act], of what happens to ppl who demonstrate un-ISLAMIC behaviour, or express un-ISLAMIC opinions!...

November 14, 2008
Taliban murders mullah critical of suicide operations

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/023511.php


Justification for such killing of non-muslims, stated within ISLAMIC law texts....

Ibn 'Abbas reported that the Prophet said: "The bare essence of Islam and the basics of the religion are three [acts], upon which Islam has been established. Whoever leaves one of them becomes an unbeliever and his blood may legally be spilled. [The acts are:] Testifying that there is no God except Allah, the obligatory prayers, and the fast of Ramadan."....

http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/law/fiqhussunnah/fus3_50.html#3.110

Parraphrasing the meaning...

"Whoever.....becomes an unbeliever.....his blood may legally be spilled."

Duh!


helian,

Why do you deny the obvious?

You may be gullible,
.....but you [and all of us] bear some responsibility for what muslims are doing today!

Every choice we make has a consequence.

And people will continue to be murdered by ISLAMISTS [real muslims], because ppl like ourselves will not hold ISLAM accountable for such actions.

But why not?

Because the TRUTH is too horrible to face up to?

For goodness sake, helian, face up to it.

ISLAM is evil.






Quote:
I cannot say what the Dalai Lama thinks and neither can you. I would suggest, however, that the Dalai Lama has been in significant dialogue with many respected Islamic theologians as he has with very senior Christian clerics of many denominations including Pope John Paul II, which would no doubt afford him a deep insight into the essential truths of these faiths.

You have presumed he is lying because he does not believe what you want to believe.


Not so.

I have presumed he is lying, because from observed statements and facts, i determine that the DL is either ignorant,
OR lying.
.....and i find it difficult to believe the DL can be so ignorant on this matter.


Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21786
A cat with a view
Re: A Question of Faith.
Reply #44 - Dec 7th, 2008 at 3:25pm
 
NorthOfNorth wrote on Dec 7th, 2008 at 8:35am:
Yadda wrote on Dec 7th, 2008 at 6:16am:
"And what is good, Phaedrus, and what is not good - need we ask anyone to tell us these things?"

Zen And The Art Of Motorcycle Maintenance
Robert M Pirsig

Pirsig’s quote suggests that you don’t need religion to know what is good or not good, true or untrue, right or wrong. So do you believe religion is unnecessary as a moral guide? If you do then perhaps you are further down the path towards atheism than you realise.




helian,

I believe that as humans, we have the 'Golden Rule', so to speak, in our hearts.

I believe that a search for TRUTH, will lead us to, and keep us on, the correct path.



This life presents all of us with choices.

I believe that if we open ourselves to lies, those lies can turn us away from the correct path.

If we ourselves turn away from TRUTH, that is a choice.

And every choice we make has a consequence.




To become a devout muslim, requires certain choices too.

You may believe that there is nothing wrong with [someone else] choosing to be a devout muslim.

I believe that it is very wrong mistaken.




+++++


One of my favourite Koran verses....

Isn't it a beauty!!!

ALLAH'S DUPES.....

"Satan makes them promises, and creates in them false desires; but satan's promises are nothing but deception.
They (his dupes) will have their dwelling in Hell, and from it they will find no way of escape."

http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/004.qmt.html#004.120






Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Send Topic Print