No, Lestat. You said nothing more. Unless along with your antidotal "evidence" it is backed up with perfect understanding of your religion in it's entirety. Is that what you are saying?

You added no new substance to the your claims, that I had already addressed.

You use the word bigot a lot. maybe it works for you with the general public. Luckily it does not frighten too many away on this forum.

locutius wrote on Jan 13^th, 2009 at 11:02pm:


Well..yes, that is what I am saying. When it comes to my religon...I know more then you, that is a fact, and I have a very clear understanding (lets say perfect) on the laws regarding 'friendship' with non-muslims.

But thats ok..I understand that you find jihadWatch much more to your liking. No questioning its claims...but subservient acceptance of what you suspected all along.

locutius wrote on Jan 13^th, 2009 at 11:02pm:


Whats there to add Locuitus. I have told a you a number of times now, most of my best friends are non-muslims. Yet you seem to question my claims.

The Islamic POV regarding friendship with non-muslims has been explained to you a number of times now...and ironically, you say I have added no substance, then the fact is my post had far more substance then you link to an anti-Islamic site which made a claim without providing any evidence or anything whatsoever to back up that claim.

I'll ask again...where were your questions when  you first read, and then provided a link to Jihad watch?

Why don't you want to answer the question. Maybe because you can't.

locutius wrote on Jan 13^th, 2009 at 11:02pm:


Why do you insist on lies to some how discredit me. As I said...not once did I call you a bigot in the my post you quoted. Here it is for you again.....

"Lestat wrote on Yesterday at 8:22pm:
locutius wrote on Jan 8th, 2009, 2:33pm:
Questions are not attacks. Questions build understanding.

They are attacks when you provide what you believe to be the answer. And as I said above, where were your questions when you did a google search and stumbled across the first anti-Islamic site you could find. Why didn't your 'questions' at least direct you to one Islamic source for your information?

It seems that you are very selective with when you ask questions...and more importantly..why.

locutius wrote on Jan 8th, 2009, 2:33pm:
And of course I do attack beliefs that I don't agree with. What else should I be doing. Embrace them?

Thats fine...but please, don't then turn around and attack others for doing likewise. It does nothing but make you look a hypocrite.

locutius wrote on Jan 8th, 2009, 2:33pm:
Then lets get back to those past topics, refresh them. I mentioned some already.

What topics? I asked a simple question...you seem to think that I am such a huge threat to you and your way of like...I would of thought that their would be heaps of things you could list of the top of your head.

I'll ask again...

What beliefs DO I have that are a threat to you freedom and quality of life.

Really...you should stop making silly generalisations and remember that at the end of the day, we are all human beings. Yes..even muslims...believe it or not.

locutius wrote on Jan 8th, 2009, 2:33pm:
I don't know......and no. But we may not have a choice.

This is a cop out. You always have a choice. And before you make it, just remember, every choice has its consequences. "



Its interesting...that twice now you have crapped on about how I've called you a bigot, and interestingly you have quoted my post where the word does not appear once. When I challenged you on this you once again flatly refused to answer.

Yet here you are again making the same lie. Why do you lie Locuitus...this is not a western characteristic, as I know many westerners who do not lie.

Perhaps it is a symptom of Islamophobes..it would appear they all have this in common.

Lestat wrote on Jan 14^th, 2009 at 6:58am:


Quote:


Now now, you might hurt my internetz feelings....

Quote:


Well - let's say you are 100% right. Does it matter? Or that you are wrong, does it matter? And certainly, your opinion of me doesnt change my circumstances. I don't need your validation for my ego.

Quote:


Now, I imagine this is designed to get some sort of reaction. But, what reaction would be appropriate? Have a pointless debate about who is more courageous? Bit on the kindergarten side. It's more of your 'Im the King of the Castle' rhetoric. Very lowbrow.

Quote:


Who knows. Seems like you have a bit of an internet forum board therapeutic diagnosis thing going on. Hope it works out for you.

Quote:


Now now, temper temper. Sticks and stones etc etc...

find it hilarious that the 2 Muslims zealots here are the ones who continually speak in colours and about races...  closet racists perhaps.

Does it mean if you dont like some part of someone elses culture, your automatically a racist

It probably says you cant be friends with the infidel but you can move to their country, buy a Tarago or a Land Cruiser, have 5 or 6 kids, clogg up Centrelink, drool over the woman then try eventually demand an Islamic state within a state, with plans to out populate the locals, it goes something like that.

Lol, yes they're pretty much the understandings I have of lslamic "LAW", but I'd like to hear it from the horse's mouth - the "expert".

abu_rashid wrote on Jan 14^th, 2009 at 8:49pm:



Reading the Koran or musulman attempts of explaining what they want infidels to think about their beliefs is like looking at an Escher drawing during a major psychochemical intervention - an utter, helpless and hopeless disorientation, desolate discombobulation and a  suffocating fear of oozing, creeping insanity.
[mod: ]