Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 
Send Topic Print
Islamic immigration (Read 31245 times)
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.
Re: Islamic immigration
Reply #210 - Jan 22nd, 2009 at 4:00pm
 
Gaybriel wrote on Jan 22nd, 2009 at 3:40pm:
freediver wrote on Jan 22nd, 2009 at 3:34pm:
Quote:
in terms of reception- it would probably be better accepted coming from a woman


What makes you think that?


just general logic- I dont think the difference would be so much that people wouldn't criticise it, but it would be different


Do you mean in a historical context? I don't think the opinion of women was well recieved in the past. I don't see many female 'cult leaders' these days either.

Can you explain your 'general logic'?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Gaybriel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1191
Re: Islamic immigration
Reply #211 - Jan 22nd, 2009 at 4:20pm
 
freediver wrote on Jan 22nd, 2009 at 4:00pm:
Gaybriel wrote on Jan 22nd, 2009 at 3:40pm:
freediver wrote on Jan 22nd, 2009 at 3:34pm:
Quote:
in terms of reception- it would probably be better accepted coming from a woman


What makes you think that?


just general logic- I dont think the difference would be so much that people wouldn't criticise it, but it would be different


Do you mean in a historical context? I don't think the opinion of women was well recieved in the past. I don't see many female 'cult leaders' these days either.

Can you explain your 'general logic'?


I mean the reception from women might be better if hearing it from a female source.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: Islamic immigration
Reply #212 - Feb 2nd, 2009 at 9:22pm
 
abu_rashid wrote on Jan 13th, 2009 at 9:28pm:
Calanen,

As I've stated several times before, you're either an outright liar, prostituting your soul to defend this crap, or you're just gullible and don't have the capacity to know any better, either way your credibility in this debate is shot.

Quote:
The headmaster of the school was a rocket engineer.


This case, as I mentioned has NOTHING at all to do with the current conflict in Gaza. It is old news, from about 8 months ago, that you either deliberately or inadvertadly dredged  up to support your failing arguments.

EXCLUSIVE-Gaza headmaster was Islamic Jihad "rocket-maker" (Mon May 5, 2008 9:08am EDT)

Note: In May of last year it  *was* exclusive, today it's just old news that you've falsely used to bolster your argument. I really should be a little more diligent, and investigate all your trumped up claims. I wouldn't be surprised if most of them turn out like this.

Freediver,

You should really be a little more diligent too and not just jump on the bandwagon. Or you risk losing credibility along with this guy.

Now I will ask again, the U.N school that was bombed by Israel on Jan 9th. 2009 in Jabaliyah refugee camp, and Israel reported militants fired from inside there, a claim the UN disproved, and Israel later admitted was perhaps a 'mistake'. This makes it quite clear that Israel instantly claims everything was a case of human shields, militants inside etc. yet sometimes they get exposed as lies. How about all the other times nobody's there to expose it? After all, who here believes anything whatsoever that Hamas says?

Israeli massacre at UN school exposed
No militants in bombed Gaza school: UN
Israeli shelling kills dozens at UN school in Gaza



Er... UN Admits: IDF Didn't Hit School

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/129696

How embarrassment !!


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 
Send Topic Print