bump.

Really disappointed, though not surprised, nobody has attempted an answer on this one.

Quote:


You should stop reading the garbage they publish on jihadwatch.

The vast majority of those so called "deadly terror attacks" are actually military operations against occupation forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. Get real.

Quote:


They are Arabs, who were resisting a foreign entity in their lands. When Muslims do that, it's no unfathomable action, it's a normal response of any human being whose country has been invaded and overrun,  as it was for these Christians also. The resistance to the Zionist entity is not peculiar to Islam nor to Muslims, nor is it symbolic of any "Jew hatred", as Calanen claims "Anymore than fighting the Nazis was Germanphobia".

Firstly go check the so called 12,000 list, many of them are military operations  against occupation forces, the fact they use military operations against occupation forces to swell their list means their list is a load of rotting bovine faeces.

Secondly the Iraqi civil war has very little to do with Islam. It's more to do with pro-American elements vs. anti-American elements, the relevant word here being  America. Prior to the invasion of America no such state of affairs existed, and the blame falls squarely on the U.S.

Quote:


Some of them would fall into these categories, the vast majority would not. Most of them are attacks on foreign invading soldiers and the police/soldiers they've trained and setup to run their installed puppet governments.

Generally when you invade, occupy and try to setup a puppet government in people's countries, they do resist. Again, like with the Zionist issue, this is what occurs when you go into other people's countries and mess them around. When it comes to you, you'd do the same, or probably worse.

Quote:


Since I never claimed any acts that remotely resemble this as resistance, that statement's just sensationalist garbage.

Quote:


The U.S and other European powers armed and funded him throughout all that time. Don't try to blame his actions on us, he was clearly your man.

Quote:


There was no sunni shia war. Saddam murdered just as many Sunni, if not more than he did Shia. The lame attempt to cast Saddam as a champion of Sunnism who fought and slaughtered Shi'a is just nonsense. He fought Muslims, no matter what their sect, and he did it at the behest of the "peaceful christians". Mentioning Saddam is a blight against your own side, not mine.

Quote:


I could accept that, if you could accept none of Europe belongs to whites, thee only land that belongs to whites is Chechnya/Georgia. Since that's where whites apparently originated from.

Quote:


Most peoples migrated from somewhere to their  present locations... nothing specific to Muslims/Arabs. This speaks more about your ignorance of human nature and history than it does about the invalid claims of Arabs to be left in peace in their own lands.

Until the West evacuates all Muslim lands, they are just speaking garbage by claiming to be tthe victims of Muslim aggressions. Get out, and then complain all you like. Stay in the kitchen, put up with the heat.

Quote:


Well I guess that would depend on whether you wanted to leave such displacement/expansionist behaviours in the past, or whether you wanted to perpetuate them into the present and future. I was under the impression most of humanity wanted to leave them in the past.

But if you insist, so be it. See you in Andalus.

Quote:


Islam respects women. So I don't see why not. And yes we know, there's some Muslims who don't respect women very well, just like there's a lot of Westerners who don't too... that has little to do with Islam though. However with the West, I think it really does have a lot to do with the belliefs/ideology. The West treat women as a commodity to be bought and sold and used and abused like pieces of meat. The woman is not dignified nor honourable, she is just a piece of eyecandy used to satisfy the desires.

Yadda wrote on Mar 6^th, 2009 at 11:31am:


simple minds are amused by simple posts.