Quote:

Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, October 3, 2001, to Shimon Peres, as reported on Kol Yisrael radio.

Quote:

Ariel Sharon

Quote:

Yitzhak Pundak

Quote:

Lev Greenberg

Quote:

Reuven Pedatzur

Quote:

sraeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, 25 March, 2001 quoted in BBC News Online.

^ That one is particularly sick.

Quote:

Ariel Sharon

Quote:

Benyamin Netanyahu

http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/03/31/mideast/hamas.php

Quote:


http://www.hirhome.com/israel/pal_mov.htm

In 1929 there were Arab terrorist riots in British Mandate Palestine against the civilian Jewish population that lived there.

Quote:


This was not the first mass racist attack by Arabs against unarmed civilian Jews in British Mandate ‘Palestine,’ nor would it be the last attempted extermination.

The original PLO Charter, elaborated in 1964, states in article 24 that:

Quote:


Notice: when it was formed in 1964, the PLO went out of its way to state that the West Bank and Gaza (1) were not ‘Palestinian’ lands, (2) rightfully belonged to Jordan and Egypt, respectively (this was false: Jordan and Egypt were illegal squatters), and (3) were of no interest to the PLO. Isn’t it curious that the ‘international community’ has forced down Israel’s throat a ‘Palestinian state’ precisely in those territories, the West Bank and Gaza, that the founding constitution of the Palestine Liberation Organization explicitly declared, in a special article, were not ‘Palestinian’?

Is there any logic to the PLO’s decisions? There is.

To discover this PLO logic the trick is to notice, glinting like a needle in the haystack of tangled and nested absurdity, the following consistency:

Quote:


The only difference is that in those two dates the borders of Israel were not the same: in 1964 Israel did not control the West Bank and Gaza, and in 1968 it did. What happened between 1964 and 1968? The Six Day War of 1967.

The PLO’s definition of ‘Palestine’ is essentially this: ‘wherever the Jews are in the Middle East.’

It's just in the wrong place that's all, and will probably just be deleted anyway, so why bother wasting your time and ours? Just make your own thread for them. You can get more exposure then.

Anyway back to the Zionist quotes:

n 1904, before Zionism matured into a powerful political force, Menachem Ussishkin stated that:

    "[Land is acquired] by force --- that is, by conquest in war, or in other words, by ROBBING land form its owner; . . . by expropriation via government authority; or by purchase. . . [The Zionist movement was limited to the third choice] until at some point we become rulers." (Righteous Victims, p. 38)

On May 19, 1936,Manachem Ussishkin declared:

    "What we can demand today is that all Transjordan be included in the Land of Israel. . . on condition that Transjordan would be either be made available for Jewish colonization or for the resettlement of those [Palestinian] Arabs, whose lands [in Palestine] we would purchase. Against this, the most conscientious person could not argue . . . For the [Palestinian] Arabs of the Galilee, Transjordan is a province . . . this will be for the resettlement of Palestine's Arabs. This the land problem. . . . Now the [Palestinian] Arabs DO NOT WANT want us because we want to be the rulers. I will fight for this. I will make sure that we will be the landlords of this land . . . . because this country belongs to us not to them . . . " (Expulsion Of The Palestinians, p. 51)

In 1938 Menachem Ussishkin commented on the partition plan proposed by the British  Peel Commission in 1937:

    "We cannot begin the Jewish state with population of which the Arab living on their lands constitute almost half and the Jews exists on the land in very small numbers and they are all crowded in Tel Aviv and its vicinity .... and the WORST is not only the [Palestinian] Arabs here constitute 50 percent or 45 percent but 75 percent of the land is in the hands of the [Palestinian] Arabs. Such a state cannot survive even for half an hour ..... The question is not whether they will be majority or a minority in Parliament. You know that even a small minority could disrupt the whole order of parliamentary life..... therefore I would say to the [Peel] Commission and the government that we would not accept reduced Land of Israel without you giving us the land, on the one hand, and removing the largest number of [Palestinian] Arabs-particularly the peasants- on the other before we come forward to take the reins of government in our lands even provisionally." (Expulsion Of The Palestinians, p. 111-112; see also Righteous Victims, p. 143-144)

In October 1882, Validimir Dubnow, one of the earliest Zionist pioneers in Palestine, wrote to his brother articulating the ultimate goals of the Zionist movement:

    "The ultimate goal . . . is, in time, to take over the Land of Israel and to restore to the Jews the political independence they have been deprived of for these two thousand years. . . . The Jews will yet arise and, arms in hand (if need be), declare that they are the masters of their ancient homeland." (Righteous Victims, p. 49)

In October 1882 Ben-Yehuda and Yehiel Michal Pines, few of the earliest Zionist pioneers in Palestine, wrote describing the indigenous Palestinians:

    ". . . There are now only five hundred [thousand] Arabs, who are not very strong, and from whom we shall easily take away the country if only we do it through stratagems [and] without drawing upon us their hostility before we become a the strong and papules ones." (Righteous Victims, p. 49)

In October 1882 Ben-Yehuda and Yehiel Michal Pines, few of the earliest Zionist pioneers in Palestine, wrote describing the indigenous Palestinians:

    ". . . There are now only five hundred [thousand] Arabs, who are not very strong, and from whom we shall easily take away the country if only we do it through stratagems [and] without drawing upon us their hostility before we become a the strong and papules ones." (Righteous Victims, p. 49)

While the Zionist leadership was discussing the morality of "transferring" the Palestinian people in December 1918, Yitzhak Avigdor Wilkansky, an agronomist and advisor at the Palestine Office in JAFFA, felt that, for practical reasons, it was:

    "impossible to evict the fellahin [Palestinian Arab peasants], even if we wanted to. Nevertheless, if it were possible, I would commit an injustice towards the [Palestinian] Arabs. There are those among us who are opposed to this form the point of view of supreme righteousness and morality. . . .[But] when you enter into the midst of the Arab nation and do not allow it to unit, here too you are taking its life. . . . Why don't our moralists dwell on this point? We must be either complete vegetarians or meat eaters: not one-half, one-third, or one-quarter vegetarian." (Righteous Victims, p. 140-141 & America And The Founding Of Israel, p. 71)

I suggest your read this...

http://www.hirhome.com/israel/pal_mov.htm

all of it...  then if you haven't choked on your own vomit, get back to us.

Quote:


Read some of the first page. Is there a point to it? Other than to reiterate Zionist nonsense, ALL of which has been completely refuted.

Just to start you off, the Arab riots occured in 1929, look through my Zionist quotes prior to 1929, and you might get some idea of what caused the riots. Also, Jews were mass illegally immigrating at such a rate, they'd already become 25% of the population within 30 years of Zionist activities. I shudder to think how Australians will deal with Muslims if we went from 2% to 25% in 30 years, due tto mass illegal immigration... We've already seen that Muslims have caused Australians to riot when we're still only 2%, haven't formed any Muslim-only settlements, nor formed any committees for the specific cause of "transferring" Australians out of Australia. Jews had done all these things by 1929... really can you blame the Arabs? Just put yourself in their situation for a moment...

Also I couldn't find any  references for the claims Muslims deliberately slaughtered children in Hebron. Sounds like propaganda to me. 3 children unfortunately were killed in the rioting, but since it was such a low number it sounds like it was just by accident, being caught up in the riot. If it were deliberate, surely more would've perished. Anyway, those responsible for it were brought to justice:

Quote:


Compare that to the Zionist Baruch Goldstein, who committed his own one man Hebron Massacre in 1994, when he walked into a mosque and sprayed the praying Muslims with a machine gun, before he was overpowered by the couragous Muslims and killed. More than twice as many children were murdered by this one man alone in that Hebron massacre...

Baruch Goldstein is to this day idolised, and there is a monument in his honour declaring him a blessed man who served the state of Israel and the Jewish people. Each years Jews gather to re-enact his massacre and to praise him and mourn his loss

Nice article. I too have spoken with Australian Jews who reject the propaganda that Hamas is a terrorist organisation. There are quite a few out there, just that the propagandists have louder voices, and more people are duped into following them.

Good on her for having a conscience and speaking out for the oppressed.

Yes Arafat could've gotten back more territory than at the time of the '67 war. Now he's dead, rotting in the ground and not living in paradise, and his people still suffer.
The dumbass Palestinians keep fighting and keep losing more ground. They'll never accept Israel's right to exist, as Israel accepts Palestine's right to exist. So Israel may as well drive them into the desert. They get what they deserve.