muso wrote on Jan 30
th, 2009 at 10:09am:
Reductionism? Well ok. It's just that we have a pretty good idea of how it all functions, and if some of the effects we are talking about are predictable consequences of this anyway, just why do we need to add superfluous mystical explanations?
It's like any other technical subject. We have the custodians of the technical information, who know how say computers work, then we have the general population who just use them.
If it is possible to grasp the technical details of a subject by investing some time and effort studying it, does that justify the lazy position of just attributing it all to the great Etruscan God Turms, who controls the internet, thought processes and in fact all information technology - biological or inorganic?
Is ignorance a good excuse for mysticism? You tell me, because ignorance, new age charlatanism and mysticism are all in plague proportions.
muso,
[off topic, but in the same ball park]
You ask.....
Quote:.......Is ignorance a good excuse for mysticism?
You should watch this series, which is availble on YOUTUBE.
precis,
A group of scientists find mechanisms in our bodies, and in the bodies of animals, which they can't explain in/by evolution.
These scientists argue that,
logically [and quite convincingly], that it would seem impossible that evolution could produce the particular mechanisms examined.
It is quite detailed, and scientific.
I have not seen a refutation of this
scientific evidence, which questions how is it possible that evolution could produce such mechanisms within animal bodies?
.....[given the stated scientific understanding, of how evolution is
supposed to work]
I have this program on DVD.
YOUTUBE
"Unlocking the Mystery of Life preview"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4Ot0YKHoTk