Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 
Send Topic Print
A Religion of Evil (Read 16508 times)
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: A Religion of Evil
Reply #60 - Feb 16th, 2009 at 2:39pm
 
Yadda wrote on Feb 16th, 2009 at 1:07pm:
Sorry muso,

Now that, is something i cannot agree with, or find merit in [organised religion].

Spit! Spit!    Wink



I believe that our search for God, is personal, and MUST BE personally motivated!

If a person wants to find God, seek him, personally,
.....by praying to him, and by reading the Bible [start in the Pslams].



*****Inappropriate Mirth deleted********

I can see a lot of irony in that. You want religion to be less organised, so you read the Bible. You want to find God personally, so you read the Bible.

To define the problem, it seems to me that you see the Bible as the product of God, through some circular process of reasoning initiated by the Mantra of "God Exists because it says so in the Bible" and  "The Bible is the inspired word of God, because God tells me that through his word in the Bible".

To me, the Bible is just a Christian Handbook - a way in which religion can be organised and depersonalised, generally through some historical process of skullduggery.
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21580
A cat with a view
Re: A Religion of Evil
Reply #61 - Feb 16th, 2009 at 2:57pm
 
muso wrote on Feb 16th, 2009 at 2:39pm:
*****Inappropriate Mirth deleted********

I can see a lot of irony in that. You want religion to be less organised, so you read the Bible. You want to find God personally, so you read the Bible.

To define the problem, it seems to me that you see the Bible as the product of God, through some circular process of reasoning initiated by the Mantra of "God Exists because it says so in the Bible" and  "The Bible is the inspired word of God, because God tells me that through his word in the Bible".

To me, the Bible is just a Christian Handbook - a way in which religion can be organised and depersonalised, generally through some historical process of skullduggery.




muso,

Yes, yes, har! har! har!      Grin      Grin       Grin

I can see your argument.

Yadda's logic is circular, and based on an ancient document/writings.

And your argument makes some sense.







In the whole history of mankind [in my opinion]......

No people like [ancient] Israel.

No book, like the Bible.




But the 'blind' don't see anything special in either of these historic 'anomalies'.

That is their right, that is their choice.


Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: A Religion of Evil
Reply #62 - Feb 16th, 2009 at 3:13pm
 
Yadda wrote on Feb 16th, 2009 at 2:57pm:
But the 'blind' don't see anything special in either of these historic 'anomalies'.

That is their right, that is their choice.



It's all relative. Saul of Tarsus had some major blindspots (they can be caused by bright lights/ epilepsy etc I guess), and yet a lot of Christianity is defined by his personal Mountaintop view.

You claim that our Muslim friends have quite a few blind spots too. Maybe they should spend some time on your mountain, or mine. Maybe we should visit their mountain occasionally. You may not like the view, but you just might get some understanding.

I guess if you can't take Mohammed to the mountain, take the mountain to Mohammed.  Maybe that's what you've been doing all along. Grin
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: A Religion of Evil
Reply #63 - Feb 16th, 2009 at 4:22pm
 
Yadda wrote on Feb 16th, 2009 at 2:24pm:
I feel that your assessment of what we believers view as God's plan, is still ignoring an aspect which i would refer to as the 'big picture'.

So many ppl view the tenets of Christianity purely on the basis of the declarations which are made within the NT.

And even many Christians view their faith as a 'replacement', of Judaism.

People, including Christians, who ignore the spiritual 'lessons' given in the OT are missing the 'big picture'.

....

My own perception is, that we, as individuals are made to suffer within this reality, to bear afflictions, which test us.

Afflictions force us to make choices.

And in our choices, we are revealed for what we are, flawed.



If you believe the tenets of Christianity are not to be found purely in the NT then you are not purely a Christian.

Your perceptions (as explained above) is basic Buddhism... i.e. the doctrines of suffering (samsara) and karma.

As individuals we suffer within this reality (samsara) and bear afflictions (based on karma) which test us. Karma forces us to make choices that reflect our karmic state. And in our choices (and what happens to us), our karma is revealed.
Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
Jim Profit
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 439
Gender: male
Re: A Religion of Evil
Reply #64 - Feb 16th, 2009 at 6:57pm
 
What the hell happened to my topic?!
Back to top
 

But I still believe there's something left for you and me.
 
IP Logged
 
mozzaok
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 6741
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: A Religion of Evil
Reply #65 - Feb 16th, 2009 at 8:34pm
 
Quote:
What the hell happened to my topic?!


Don't ask me, I didn't even read your post, I just jumped in later, when I saw some interesting views posted.

Unless it stars Thor, I am not into cartoons.
I think I bought my last comic book in about 1974, which would have been a ZAP comic, with dirty dora's dykes, and fat freddy's cat.

I appreciate that your modern cartoons appeal to lots of the younger generation, and that is as it should be, but I tend to skip, or skim them.
Back to top
 

OOPS!!! My Karma, ran over your Dogma!
 
IP Logged
 
tallowood
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5695
Re: A Religion of Evil
Reply #66 - Feb 16th, 2009 at 9:38pm
 
mozzaok wrote on Feb 16th, 2009 at 8:34pm:
Quote:
What the hell happened to my topic?!


Don't ask me, I didn't even read your post, I just jumped in later, when I saw some interesting views posted.

Unless it stars Thor, I am not into cartoons.
I think I bought my last comic book in about 1974, which would have been a ZAP comic, with dirty dora's dykes, and fat freddy's cat.

I appreciate that your modern cartoons appeal to lots of the younger generation, and that is as it should be, but I tend to skip, or skim them.



I like Thor too,I reckon he will beat Mohammed in the battle of Ragnorock.




Back to top
 

Reality is a figment of imagination
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: A Religion of Evil
Reply #67 - Feb 17th, 2009 at 9:00am
 
Jim Profit wrote on Feb 16th, 2009 at 6:57pm:
What the hell happened to my topic?!



It was subjected to a mercy killing. Sorry but I hate to see a topic suffering. It was in agony and it was either a case of destroy it, or be destroyed by the riveting apathy of mental masturbation.
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21580
A cat with a view
Re: A Religion of Evil
Reply #68 - Feb 17th, 2009 at 10:14am
 
NorthOfNorth wrote on Feb 16th, 2009 at 4:22pm:
....If you believe the tenets of Christianity are not to be found purely in the NT then
you are not purely a Christian
.




I accept God's purpose for man, as revealed in the OT & NT, including God's plan to redeem mankind.

I seek him, and wait upon my creator to reveal himself [as he will].

I acknowledge my sins, that have been revealed before God, and ask God for his forgiveness, for all my foolish mistakes in this life.

I accept Jesus Christ as the atonement sacrifice for my sins.






Quote:
Your perceptions (as explained above) is basic Buddhism
... i.e. the doctrines of suffering (samsara) and karma.

As individuals we suffer within this reality (samsara) and bear afflictions (based on karma) which test us. Karma forces us to make choices that reflect our karmic state. And in our choices (and what happens to us), our karma is revealed.



I don't see any inconsistency in my belief, about our collective circumstance, and the path of our 'karma' [as is revealed within the Bible, OT & NT].


Galatians 6:7
Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.


But even if Buddhism comes to these same basic conclusions [about our 'karma'], Buddhism is a Godless philosophy.

Buddhism denies the creator [if i am not mistaken???].



Buddhism comes to its own conclusions about 'life', without 'discovering' a creation God, and without revealing how we are redeemed - spiritually.

Why is that?




Maybe God has a method of redeeming Buddhists too?

I don't know.

But i know that God is just, in all his dealings with us.



I believe Paul explored this problem, of the fate of righteous 'unbelievers', in the NT....


Romans 2:11
For there is no respect of persons with God.
12  For as many as have sinned without law shall also perish without law: and as many as have sinned in the law shall be judged by the law;
13  (For not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified.
14  For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves:
15  Which shew the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another;)






But if Buddhism 'spins your wheel', OK.      Smiley

That is your choice.

But I point to the Bible, to our righteous God, and to Jesus Christ.


Isaiah 53:1
Who hath believed our report? and to whom is the arm of the LORD revealed?
2  For he shall grow up before him as a tender plant, and as a root out of a dry ground: he hath no form nor comeliness; and when we shall see him, there is no beauty that we should desire him.
3  He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief: and we hid as it were our faces from him; he was despised, and we esteemed him not.
4  Surely he hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows: yet we did esteem him stricken, smitten of God, and afflicted.
5  But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.
6  All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all.


Proverbs 8:35
For whoso findeth me findeth life, and shall obtain favour of the LORD.
36  But he that sinneth against me wrongeth his own soul: all they that hate me love death.

Supposedly those last verses from Proverbs refer to 'wisdom'.




Hosea 14:9
Who is wise, and he shall understand these things? prudent, and he shall know them? for the ways of the LORD are right, and the just shall walk in them: but the transgressors shall fall therein.


The wisdom in the Bible is way too deep for me.

I'm just scratching the surface of many of its hidden spiritual secrets.

But the spirit of God guides me where it will.


1 Corinthians 13:12
For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.




Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: A Religion of Evil
Reply #69 - Feb 17th, 2009 at 11:51am
 
Yadda wrote on Feb 17th, 2009 at 10:14am:
Buddhism denies the creator [if i am not mistaken???].



Buddhism has numerous sects of wildly varying beliefs. That's on top of being absurdly ambiguous in the first place. In some forms, it's more of a philosophy than a religion, and it shares its obsession for asceticism with Christianity.

Having said that, Christianity is not exactly monolithic either, and to be quite honest I don't see why you can't be both Christian and Buddhist if that particular combination cranks your handle. I'm sure there must be Christian Buddhists out there who will confirm that.

Getting back to your original statement, belief in a creator would not necessarily be incompatible with Buddhism at its most basic level.
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21580
A cat with a view
Re: A Religion of Evil
Reply #70 - Feb 17th, 2009 at 12:35pm
 
muso wrote on Feb 17th, 2009 at 11:51am:
Yadda wrote on Feb 17th, 2009 at 10:14am:
Buddhism denies the creator [if i am not mistaken???].



Buddhism has numerous sects of wildly varying beliefs. That's on top of being absurdly ambiguous in the first place. In some forms, it's more of a philosophy than a religion, and it shares its obsession for asceticism with Christianity.

Having said that, Christianity is not exactly monolithic either, and to be quite honest I don't see why you can't be both Christian and Buddhist if that particular combination cranks your handle. I'm sure there must be Christian Buddhists out there who will confirm that.

Getting back to your original statement, belief in a creator would not necessarily be incompatible with Buddhism at its most basic level.




muso,

Thank you.



God in Buddhism
"Since the time of the Buddha, the refutation of the existence of a creator has been seen as a key point in distinguishing Buddhist from non-Buddhist views.[1] Buddhism is usually considered a religion, but is also commonly described as a "spiritual philosophy", because it generally lacks an Absolute creator god......"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_in_Buddhism



and.....

Buddhism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhism



Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: A Religion of Evil
Reply #71 - Feb 17th, 2009 at 12:50pm
 
muso wrote on Feb 17th, 2009 at 11:51am:
Yadda wrote on Feb 17th, 2009 at 10:14am:
Buddhism denies the creator [if i am not mistaken???].



Buddhism has numerous sects of wildly varying beliefs. That's on top of being absurdly ambiguous in the first place. In some forms, it's more of a philosophy than a religion, and it shares its obsession for asceticism with Christianity.

Having said that, Christianity is not exactly monolithic either, and to be quite honest I don't see why you can't be both Christian and Buddhist if that particular combination cranks your handle. I'm sure there must be Christian Buddhists out there who will confirm that.

Getting back to your original statement, belief in a creator would not necessarily be incompatible with Buddhism at its most basic level.

No, Buddhism rejects aceticism. Siddhartha realised that ascetic practises caused imbalance after he had spent time with a group of Saddhus. Asceticism led to the craving of hardship.

Buddhism does have varying perspectives, the most prominent split being between Theravedic (Hinayanic) and Mahayanic practice, but no religion manages to stay monolithic given enough time.

Buddhist doctrine rejects the existence of a supreme creator, but not however, (at least in Mahayanic traditions such as Tibetan Buddhism) gods. Gods in these trraditions are higher beings who are condemned never to reach enlightenment because they do not suffer samsara.

Belief in a supreme creator, while not restricting anyone from Buddhist practices, is at odds with the Buddhist doctrine of Nirvana (extinction - release from samsara - as the result of enlightenment), particularly where the doctrine of sentience in paradise (Heaven) accompanies belief in the creator.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Feb 17th, 2009 at 12:55pm by NorthOfNorth »  

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
locutius
Gold Member
*****
Offline


You can't fight in here!
It's the War Room

Posts: 1817
Queensland
Gender: male
Re: A Religion of Evil
Reply #72 - Feb 17th, 2009 at 1:51pm
 
mozzaok wrote on Feb 16th, 2009 at 8:34pm:
Quote:
What the hell happened to my topic?!


Don't ask me, I didn't even read your post, I just jumped in later, when I saw some interesting views posted.

Unless it stars Thor, I am not into cartoons.
I think I bought my last comic book in about 1974, which would have been a ZAP comic, with dirty dora's dykes, and fat freddy's cat.

I appreciate that your modern cartoons appeal to lots of the younger generation, and that is as it should be, but I tend to skip, or skim them.


Now mozza, I understand the attraction to Thor being one of the heavy-hitters for both Marvel and DC, but comeon ya can't go past the Silver Surfer.
Back to top
 

I dream of a better tomorrow, where chickens can cross the road and not be questioned about their motives.
 
IP Logged
 
tallowood
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5695
Re: A Religion of Evil
Reply #73 - Feb 17th, 2009 at 2:49pm
 
muso wrote on Feb 17th, 2009 at 11:51am:
Yadda wrote on Feb 17th, 2009 at 10:14am:
Buddhism denies the creator [if i am not mistaken???].


Buddhism has numerous sects of wildly varying beliefs. That's on top of being absurdly ambiguous in the first place. In some forms, it's more of a philosophy than a religion, and it shares its obsession for asceticism with Christianity.

Having said that, Christianity is not exactly monolithic either, and to be quite honest I don't see why you can't be both Christian and Buddhist if that particular combination cranks your handle. I'm sure there must be Christian Buddhists out there who will confirm that.

Getting back to your original statement, belief in a creator would not necessarily be incompatible with Buddhism at its most basic level.



All religions including atheism have sects and asceticism like diets and rules for suppressing individual freedoms. Organised religions even more so. Actually when a religion gets organised it becomes an ideology.


Back to top
 

Reality is a figment of imagination
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: A Religion of Evil
Reply #74 - Feb 17th, 2009 at 3:25pm
 
NorthOfNorth wrote on Feb 17th, 2009 at 12:50pm:
No, Buddhism rejects aceticism. Siddhartha realised that ascetic practises caused imbalance after he had spent time with a group of Saddhus. Asceticism led to the craving of hardship.



What I meant was the fact that Buddhist monks in countries like Burma and Thailand are not permitted to have personal means of support. They are mendicants, which basically means that they rely on begging for their basic needs. They also abstain from sexual behaviour (supposedly) and are prohibited from being alone with a woman.

Maybe it's a fine line, but to me, that's getting pretty close to the definition of asceticism that you see in Christianity.

Matthew 19:23-24 (I'm doing a Yadda)

23Then Jesus said to his disciples, "I tell you the truth, it is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. 24Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God."



Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 
Send Topic Print