NorthOfNorth wrote on Apr 30
th, 2009 at 3:34pm:
locutius wrote on Apr 30
th, 2009 at 2:35pm:
NorthOfNorth wrote on Apr 30
th, 2009 at 1:48pm:
Because our presumptions go further than just life in its simplest form existing elsewhere in the universe but to include super-intelligent life that far exceeds our own, just like what James T Kirk reported in his Captain's Log.
My presumptions
don't. I think the universe is full of life at all stages of development. Some planets never achieving a sentient lifeform. Some planets with life that we may not immediately identify as life because it is too different and maybe sometimes too advanced. There may be lifeforms that exist as pure energy. Here on earth we have viruses that science scratches it's head over. As to civilisations being millions of years more advanced than out own, sure why not, but a civilisation may only have to be 1000 years more advanced than our own to seem Godlike to us. Some species could be much younger but further advanced because their environment is unimaginably overstocked with resources so conflict never evolved so leapt ahead. Notwithstanding the argument for ourselves that war has accelorated much of out technological, medical and social abilities.
But you said earlier :
Quote:Hopefully we can avoid meeting too many advanced beings with behavioural signatures like our own, we'll end up becoming the dispossed alcoholic hangers-on of the sector or exterminated like primative tribes before us.
Does that not imply that you presume super-intelligent life exists?
What is super-intelligence? We have a word for super-intelligence here on earth ..genius. Like Einstein, Beethoven etc. I consider these individuals as super-intelligent so yes I believe it does exist. But it is probably just as rare for other species/beings as it is for us.
Are you perhaps better referring to super-technologies. Then
again, yes I do. We see it here amongst own own species that all began in the same place and time. One group have canoes and another space shuttles. Super technology does not imply superiority of intelligence regardless of what some of the racist have to say. It implies different opportunities, different resources and different will to apply and improve learnt technology and maybe more time. Nothing supernatural about it.
NorthOfNorth wrote on Apr 30
th, 2009 at 3:34pm:
locutius wrote on Apr 30
th, 2009 at 2:35pm:
NorthOfNorth wrote on Apr 30
th, 2009 at 1:48pm:
We have no proof of any of this, of course and no reason to believe that super-intelligent life exists somewhere in the universe other than the expectation that very big numbers means super-intelligent life. This mindset is in every way congruent with a deist's view of the existence of god.
I don't think it is even close to being the same thing at all. I give you exibit (a) Earth.
Congruent, I said.
You believe that surely because of all the big numbers (planets, suns etc) life, intelligent life, even super-intelligent life must exist.
Deists believe that surely because of all the order in the universe (galaxies, solar systems, stars, planets etc) an intelligent being must have started it all.
And the deists' exhibit (a) Order.
Like I said, I don't think the argument is even similar. Order along with Life are just natural parts of the exploding singularity, nothing more. Intelligent life is just a lotto of opportunities. Earth may very easily have had a budding sentient lifeform (Troodon) 65+ million years ago but nature intervened. Mammal intelligence might never have evolved.
Order describes a pattern of predictability not sentience.