Australian Politics Forum - environment discussion is a sham

tallowood

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6048

environment discussion is a sham
Feb 15^th, 2009 at 10:32am

If you think that so called environmentalists care about environment think twice before believing them.
They tell lies and when confronted with facts are trying their hardest to shut up their opponents by coming up with flimsy excuses to delete the opponents posts and/ or locking/deleting the whole threads.

In reality they only care about redirecting flow of public money to support their ideology and creating well paid jobs for themselves out of taxpayer's pocket.

Back to top

ישראל חיה ערבים לערבים

IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 49364 At my desk.	Re: environment discussion is a sham Reply #1 - Feb 15^th, 2009 at 10:20pm Shouldn't this go in the fringe board?
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

tallowood Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 6048	Re: environment discussion is a sham Reply #2 - Apr 23^rd, 2010 at 7:58pm freediver wrote on Feb 15^th, 2009 at 10:20pm: Shouldn't this go in the fringe board? Well, since it is here where environmental concerns belong let me ask a question about Icelandic volcano eruption. How does its environmental effects compare with effects of human activities?
Back to top	ישראל חיה ערבים לערבים IP Logged

Soren

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 25654
Gender: male

Re: environment discussion is a sham
Reply #3 - Apr 23^rd, 2010 at 8:43pm

Concern for society and nature are important and excellent qualities. Because of their importance, there are many charlatans who are strutting the stage pretending to be partisans of these cares. Since the fall of the Berlin Wall, many of the 'bolshevics' of the spirit have sought refuge in the 'environmental movement'. Their aim of societal make-over is now channeled through the seemingly non-partisan regiter of 'environmental conservation'. Yet for many of these peopel societal conservation is anathema. In other words, for them conservationism is both good (four legs) and bad (two legs).

Back to top

IP Logged

tallowood Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 6048	Re: environment discussion is a sham Reply #4 - Apr 26^th, 2010 at 8:54pm It is interesting to note the deafening silence of human fault proponents about Icelandic volcano influence on climate changes.
Back to top	ישראל חיה ערבים לערבים IP Logged

muso

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male

Re: environment discussion is a sham
Reply #5 - Apr 28^th, 2010 at 2:41pm

tallowood wrote on Apr 26^th, 2010 at 8:54pm:

It is interesting to note the deafening silence of human fault proponents about Icelandic volcano influence on climate changes.

No discernable effect, Tallowood. It's tiny in comparison to Mt Pinatubo, which released 15-30 million tonnes of sulphur dioxide.

Here's a write-up:
http://www.abc.net.au/environment/articles/2010/04/16//2874939.htm

- and a very nice picture showing the Aurora Borealis and Mt Eyjafjallajökull.

Back to top

volcano_2.jpg (44 KB | 37 )

1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not

IP Logged

Grendel Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 28080 Gender:	Re: environment discussion is a sham Reply #6 - Apr 28^th, 2010 at 2:45pm has it stopped erupting yet?
Back to top	IP Logged

muso Gold Member Offline Posts: 13151 Gladstone, Queensland Gender:	Re: environment discussion is a sham Reply #7 - Apr 28^th, 2010 at 4:26pm No. It will probably have eruptions way into the future. It's an active volcano after all, but will it cause a slight blip on the temperature record like Pinatubo in the next decade? Unlikely.
Back to top	1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not IP Logged

tallowood

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6048

Re: environment discussion is a sham
Reply #8 - May 1^st, 2010 at 6:52pm

muso wrote on Apr 28^th, 2010 at 2:41pm:

tallowood wrote on Apr 26^th, 2010 at 8:54pm:

It is interesting to note the deafening silence of human fault proponents about Icelandic volcano influence on climate changes.

No discernable effect, Tallowood. It's tiny in comparison to Mt Pinatubo, which released 15-30 million tonnes of sulphur dioxide.

Here's a write-up:
http://www.abc.net.au/environment/articles/2010/04/16//2874939.htm

- and a very nice picture showing the Aurora Borealis and Mt Eyjafjallajökull.

I didn't know that Mt Pinatubo was a human fault as well thanks for the enlightenment and the insight into inner workings of environmentalist mind, and a very nice picture showing the Aurora Borealis and Mt Eyjafjallajökull.

Back to top

ישראל חיה ערבים לערבים

IP Logged

muso

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male

Re: environment discussion is a sham
Reply #9 - May 2^nd, 2010 at 9:20am

tallowood wrote on May 1^st, 2010 at 6:52pm:

muso wrote on Apr 28^th, 2010 at 2:41pm:

tallowood wrote on Apr 26^th, 2010 at 8:54pm:

It is interesting to note the deafening silence of human fault proponents about Icelandic volcano influence on climate changes.

No discernable effect, Tallowood. It's tiny in comparison to Mt Pinatubo, which released 15-30 million tonnes of sulphur dioxide.

Here's a write-up:
http://www.abc.net.au/environment/articles/2010/04/16//2874939.htm

- and a very nice picture showing the Aurora Borealis and Mt Eyjafjallajökull.

I didn't know that Mt Pinatubo was a human fault as well thanks for the enlightenment and the insight into inner workings of environmentalist mind....

Say what? Did I say it was a human fault? It's the SO2 that causes the temporary cooling effect - that's all. I was just comparing Eyjafjallajökull to Mt Pinatubo in terms of magnitude. The former blasted ash up to 3km high. The latter 34 km high.

Back to top

1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not

IP Logged

tallowood Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 6048	Re: environment discussion is a sham Reply #10 - May 8^th, 2010 at 9:21pm Well if you use usual pollution per capita thing Islanders are very dirty nation, aren't they?
Back to top	ישראל חיה ערבים לערבים IP Logged

muso Gold Member Offline Posts: 13151 Gladstone, Queensland Gender:	Re: environment discussion is a sham Reply #11 - May 14^th, 2010 at 9:46pm Thinking back to my student days, yes they can be dirty Hmmm I wonder what Katrin ended up doing with her life.
Back to top	« Last Edit: May 14^th, 2010 at 9:51pm by muso » 1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not IP Logged

Soren Gold Member Offline Posts: 25654 Gender:	Re: environment discussion is a sham Reply #12 - May 14^th, 2010 at 9:56pm muso wrote on May 14^th, 2010 at 9:46pm: Thinking back to my student days, yes they can be dirty Hmmm I wonder what Katrin ended up doing with her life. She has broken free and has been working for Viscount Monckton of Brenchley. Sensible girl.
Back to top	IP Logged