Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Opium fight a huge waste of money, US envoy admits (Read 3215 times)
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 40798
Gender: male
Opium fight a huge waste of money, US envoy admits
Mar 23rd, 2009 at 8:35am
 

At last !!!!!!!! A voice of reality.

Quote:
BRUSSELS: US efforts to combat the Afghan opium trade, a main source of funds for Taliban-led insurgents, have been wasteful and Washington plans to revamp its strategy, a regional envoy says.

"The United States alone is spending over $US800 million [$1.17 billion] a year on counter-narcotics. We have gotten nothing out of it, nothing," Richard Holbrooke told senior world politicians and experts on Saturday.

"It is the most wasteful and ineffective program I have seen in 40 years in and out of the government," the new US special representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan told the Brussels Forum conference.

"We are going to try to reprogram that money. About $US160 million of it is for alternative livelihoods, and we would like to increase that. We want to re-examine it top to bottom."

The US Government said last month that Afghanistan remained the world's largest opium poppy producer, despite a 19 per cent drop in cultivation last year.

Afghanistan supplies 90 per cent of the world's heroin, much of which emanates from the southern province of Helmand, where insurgents are waging a bloody campaign against Western and Afghan forces. Several districts are outside government control and involved in opium poppy cultivation, which has evolved into a highly lucrative trade for the insurgents.

Mr Holbrooke said some crops had been destroyed but this had no real impact on the insurgents, and may have even been counter-productive.

"It hasn't hurt the Taliban one iota because whatever money they're getting from the drug trade, they get whatever they need whether we reduce the acreage or not," he said. "And by forced eradication we've all been pushing farmers into Taliban hands."

He said the US would focus heavily on agriculture reform. The President, Barack Obama, has ordered an overhaul of strategy in Afghanistan, a review expected to be completed in coming days.

Mr Holbrooke said it was planned to implement "a very significantly expanded agricultural sector job-creation set of programs - irrigation, farmer to market roads, market places, seed".

"This is an area of great promise. Rebuilding the Afghan economy is critical," he said.




http://www.smh.com.au/world/opium-fight-a-huge-waste-of-money-us-envoy-admits-20...
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
mantra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ozpolitic.com

Posts: 10750
Gender: female
Re: Opium fight a huge waste of money, US envoy admits
Reply #1 - Mar 23rd, 2009 at 9:57am
 
Quote:
"The United States alone is spending over $US800 million [$1.17 billion] a year on counter-narcotics. We have gotten nothing out of it, nothing," Richard Holbrooke told senior world politicians and experts on Saturday.


It all seems a bit suspicious.  This is a good excuse to bring the trade into the open now and let it truly flourish.  


The U.S. has been in Afghanistan for over seven years, has spent $177 billion in that country alone, and has the most powerful and technologically advanced military on Earth. GPS tracking devices can locate any spot imaginable by simply pushing a few buttons.

Still, bumper crops keep flourishing year after year, even though heroin production is a laborious, intricate process. The poppies must be planted, grown and harvested; then after the morphine is extracted it has to be cooked, refined, packaged into bricks and transported from rural locales across national borders. To make heroin from morphine requires another 12-14 hours of laborious chemical reactions. Thousands of people are involved, yet—despite the massive resources at our disposal—heroin keeps flowing at record levels.

Common sense suggests that such prolific trade over an extended period of time is no accident, especially when the history of what has transpired in that region is considered. While the CIA ran its operations during the Vietnam War, the Golden Triangle supplied the world with most of its heroin. After that war ended in 1975, an intriguing event took place in 1979 when Zbigniew Brzezinski covertly manipulated the Soviet Union into invading Afghanistan.Behind the scenes, the CIA, along with Pakistan’s ISI, were secretly funding Afghanistan’s mujahideen to fight their Russian foes. Prior to this war, opium production in Afghanistan was minimal. But according to historian Alfred McCoy, an expert on the subject, a shift in focus took place. “Within two years of the onslaught of the CIA operation in Afghanistan, the Pakistan-Afghanistan borderlands became the world’s top heroin producer.”

The Huffington Post, October 15, 2008Soon, as Professor Michel Chossudovsky notes, “CIA assets again controlled the heroin trade. As the mujahideen guerrillas seized territory inside Afghanistan, they ordered peasants to plant poppies as a revolutionary tax. Across the border in Pakistan, Afghan leaders and local syndicates under the protection of Pakistan intelligence operated hundreds of heroin laboratories.”

Eventually, the Soviet Union was defeated (their version of Vietnam), and ultimately lost the Cold War. The aftermath, however, proved to be an entirely new can of worms. During his research, McCoy discovered that “the CIA supported various Afghan drug lords, for instance Gulbuddin Hekmatyar. The CIA did not handle heroin, but it did provide its drug lord allies with transport, arms, and political protection.”

By 1994, a new force emerged in the region—the Taliban—that took over the drug trade. Chossudovsky again discovered that “the Americans had secretly, and through the Pakistanis [specifically the ISI], supported the Taliban’s assumption of power.”

These strange bedfellows endured a rocky relationship until July 2000 when Taliban leaders banned the planting of poppies. This alarming development, along with other disagreements over proposed oil pipelines through Eurasia, posed a serious problem for power centers in the West. Without heroin money at their disposal, billions of dollars could not be funneled into various CIA black budget projects. Already sensing trouble in this volatile region, 18 influential neo-cons signed a letter in 1998 which became a blueprint for war—the infamous Project for a New American Century (PNAC).

Fifteen days after 9-11, CIA Director George Tenet sent his top-secret Special Operations Group (SOG) into Afghanistan. One of the biggest revelations in Tenet’s book, At the Center of the Storm, was that CIA forces directed the Afghanistan invasion, not the Pentagon.

In the Jan. 26, 2003, issue of Time magazine, Douglas Waller describes Donald Rumsfeld’s reaction to this development. “When aides told Rumsfeld that his Army Green Beret A-Teams couldn’t go into Afghanistan until the CIA contingent had lain the groundwork with local warlords, he erupted, ‘I have all these guys under arms, and we’ve got to wait like little birds in a nest for the CIA to let us go in?’”
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mantra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ozpolitic.com

Posts: 10750
Gender: female
Re: Opium fight a huge waste of money, US envoy admits
Reply #2 - Mar 23rd, 2009 at 9:59am
 
ARMITAGE A MAJOR PLAYER

But the real operator in Afghanistan was Richard Armitage, a man whose legend includes being the biggest heroin trafficker in Cambodia and Laos during the Vietnam War; director of the State Department’s Foreign Narcotics Control Office (a front for CIA drug dealing); head of the Far East Company (used to funnel drug money out of the Golden Triangle); a close liaison with Oliver North during the Iran-Contra cocaine-for-guns scandal; a primary Pentagon official in the terror and covert ops field under George Bush the Elder; one of the original signatories of the infamous PNAC document; and the man who helped CIA Director William Casey run weapons to the mujahideen during their war against the Soviet Union. Armitage was also stationed in Iran during the mid-1970s right before Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini overthrew the shah. Armitage may well be the greatest covert operator in U.S. history.

On Sept. 10, 2001, Armitage met with the UK’s national security advisor, Sir David Manning. Was Armitage “passing on specific intelligence information about the impending terrorist attacks”? The scenario is plausible because one day later—on 9-11—Dick Cheney directly called for Armitage’s presence down in his bunker. Immediately after WTC 2 was struck, Armitage told BBC Radio, “I was told to go to the operations center [where] I spent the rest of the day in the ops center with the vice president.”

These two share a long history together. Not only was Armitage employed by Cheney’s former company Halliburton (via Brown & Root), he was also a deputy when Cheney was secretary of defense under Bush the Elder. More importantly, Cheney and Armitage had joint business and consulting interests in the Central Asian pipeline which had been contracted by Unocal. The only problem standing between them and the Caspian Sea’s vast energy reserves was the Taliban.

Since the 1980s, Armitage amassed a huge roster of allies in Pakistan’s ISI. He was also one of the “Vulcans”—along with Condi Rice, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, and Rabbi Dov Zakheim—who coordinated Bush’s geo-strategic foreign policy initiatives. Then, after 9-11, he negotiated with the Pakistanis prior to our invasion of Afghanistan, while also becoming Bush’s deputy secretary of state stationed in Afghanistan.

Our “enemy,” or course, was the Taliban “terrorists.” But George Tenet, Colin Powell, Porter Goss, and Armitage had developed a close relationship with Pakistan’s military head of the ISI—General Mahmoud Ahmad— who was cited in a Sept. 2001 FBI report as “supporting and financing the alleged 9-11 terrorists, as well as having links to al Qaeda and the Taliban.”

The line between friend and foe gets even murkier. Afghan President Hamid Karzai not only collaborated with the Taliban, but he was also on Unocal’s payroll in the mid-1990s. He is also described by Saudi Arabia’s Al-Watan newspaper as being “a Central Intelligence Agency covert operator since the 1980s that collaborated with the CIA in funding U.S. aid to the Taliban.”

Capturing a new, abundant source for heroin was an integral part of the U.S. “war on terror.” Hamid Karzai is a puppet ruler of the CIA; Afghanistan is a full-fledged narco-state; and the poppies that flourish there have yet to be eradicated, as was proven in 2003 when the Bush administration refused to destroy the crops, despite having the chance to do so.

Major drug dealers are rarely arrested, smugglers enjoy carte blanche immunity, and Nushin Arbabzadah, writing for The Guardian, theorized that “U.S. Army planes leave Afghanistan carrying coffins empty of bodies, but filled with drugs.” Is that why the military protested so vehemently when reporters tried to photograph returning caskets


http://www.rawa.org/temp/runews/2008/11/24/cia-heroin-still-rule-day-in-afghanis...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 97330
Re: Opium fight a huge waste of money, US envoy admits
Reply #3 - Feb 16th, 2010 at 1:28pm
 
A fascinating article, Mantra. I believe some of it to be true.

Other stuff...

I'd be interested to see the link between Armitage and Haliburton (via Brown and Root), and real proof that the invasion of Afghanistan was driven by the Oil Pipeline scheme. It makes perfect sense, but sometimes the bleeding obvious is a ruse.

I'd like to see the facts.

Fascinating that the CIA led the invasion into Afghanistan. No wonder Tenant was eventually brought down - the scheming among Hawks like Rumsfeld and "outsiders" like Powell must have played a huge part, but Tennant was ultimately let loose because of the lack of WMD's in Iraq - just like powell.

They were cut down because of Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, and ultimately Bush's failings.

I also doubt that the US INTENTIONALLY created a narco-state to facilitate the pipeline scheme - no doubt to counter Russia in the region. I could be incredibly naive, but I believe that this was an unintentional result of US policy.

The idea that Karzai was a CIA operative - sure, it's likely. But the CIA gets information from many people in many regions. It doesn't necessarily connect the US to the drug trade.

The idea that the US are flying opium out of Afghanistan in coffins is silly.

Alfred McCoy is respectable when it comes to US involvement in the drug trade. He first wrote the Politics of Heroin in South East Asia about the Vietnam war. Some of the other sources...

Still, I'd love to know more.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mozzaok
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 6741
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Opium fight a huge waste of money, US envoy admits
Reply #4 - Feb 16th, 2010 at 4:16pm
 
GUNS, DRUGS, MONEY!

That is it, even if we are seeing a shift in emphasis in the drug markets of the west, away from heroin, the bottom line is there will remain a captive market for some time to come still, and while people want to buy weapons, it benefits those who sell weapons for the drug trade to flourish.

The only minor quibble I would have with the facts presented was the move to heroin in the middle east was started at the time of the Iran/Iraq war, and it was Iranians producing the heroin, to buy weapons to defeat saddam.
Iran has had a very serious internal problem with heroin use since that period of the late 1970's.

How much that was influenced by US secret agencies I do not know.

The manufacture of heroin is not a difficult process when compared to some other drugs, and the reality is that until the countries who sell the weapons start to monitor that trade, then the drug trade will be going flat out.
Back to top
 

OOPS!!! My Karma, ran over your Dogma!
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 97330
Re: Opium fight a huge waste of money, US envoy admits
Reply #5 - Feb 17th, 2010 at 3:53pm
 
Actually, the move of heroin production from South East Asia to Central Asia probably happened in the mid 1990s, following the fall of the Soviets.

Previously, opium was grown there, but exported to be manufactured somewhere else. Europe was the primary market.

The fall of the Burmese warlord, Kun Sha, ended large scale export opium production in South East Asia. Once, this opium went to Hong Kong to be turned into heroin there. In Australia, we were still getting South East Asian heroin in Cabramatta in the early 2000s.

Pakistani heroin is largely brown, but I think they now produce some good export-grade white stuff. It was trickling through India in the mid 1990s.

In America, much of the heroin comes from Mexico.

The 90% figure from Afghanistan/Pakistan sounds very high. I doubt the Golden Triangle produces much heroin (for export) anymore, but Mexican production must be fairly high now.

We've always been "spoilt" with high-grade white heroin in Australia, but the prices were consistently high.

Europeans (and now Americans) are used to brown heroin (or "brown sugar"), which is not as good.

Mind you, they always stepped on the white with lactose, so it didn't make much difference in the end.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mozzaok
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 6741
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Opium fight a huge waste of money, US envoy admits
Reply #6 - Feb 18th, 2010 at 9:08am
 
I do not know how high up the drug chain the CIA goes, but evidence puts them in the middle of much of the drug trade since the 1960's.

I had personal experience of a truck driver friend who used to pick up large quantities of cocaine from the US base in West Germany in the early 1980's, and bring it back to England for distribution.
This went on consistently for the couple of years I was there, and probably long after, so while it may have been just entrepreneurial individuals within the military, the fact that it carried on so long points to some pretty high up acceptance of the project.

The link to the CIA was supposed because it was a known method for developing a continuing funding program for buying weapons, for those whom the US backed.

I also met people in the IRA back then, in the late '70's and early '80's, who also used drugs to finance their operations.

So the link between weapons and drugs is pretty well undeniable, and the big countries who sell these weapons really need a far better system for monitoring just where their weapons end up.
Back to top
 

OOPS!!! My Karma, ran over your Dogma!
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 97330
Re: Opium fight a huge waste of money, US envoy admits
Reply #7 - Feb 24th, 2010 at 1:09pm
 
mozzaok wrote on Feb 18th, 2010 at 9:08am:
I do not know how high up the drug chain the CIA goes, but evidence puts them in the middle of much of the drug trade since the 1960's.

I had personal experience of a truck driver friend who used to pick up large quantities of cocaine from the US base in West Germany in the early 1980's, and bring it back to England for distribution.
This went on consistently for the couple of years I was there, and probably long after, so while it may have been just entrepreneurial individuals within the military, the fact that it carried on so long points to some pretty high up acceptance of the project.

The link to the CIA was supposed because it was a known method for developing a continuing funding program for buying weapons, for those whom the US backed.

I also met people in the IRA back then, in the late '70's and early '80's, who also used drugs to finance their operations.

So the link between weapons and drugs is pretty well undeniable, and the big countries who sell these weapons really need a far better system for monitoring just where their weapons end up.


You're so right. You should read that book Mr Nice, about how the IRA used to smuggle hash into the UK in their weapons crates. It's hilarious.

And I believe the Iran-Contra affair in the 1980s involved cocaine smuggling too, so it's no suprise coke was turning up in Germany.

It's impossible to find out how high up the chain these things go. Those on the bottom always take the rap if exposed.

I wonder if its even possible for corruption to occur within the CIA at the lower operative levels. With the sort of recruitment and training processes involved, you'd think intelligence officers would be pretty influenced from the top-down, but again - I could be naive.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49773
At my desk.
Re: Opium fight a huge waste of money, US envoy admits
Reply #8 - May 2nd, 2018 at 10:25am
 
This Topic was moved here from Drug Policy by freediver.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print