Women are already redundant.

It may surprise you to know that a man can transition to female and have children. A transplant of a uterus can be done, and genetic engineering can make a child to grow within this 'new' woman, and she can give birth.

So, someone who is genetically male can carry a foetus to term and deliver it.

Some sex changes are so good you can't tell.

Women are redundant. In the interests of decency though, they continue to exist.

It would be wrong to just get rid of them, even though there is no actual 'need' for them any longer.

Men are always going to be necessary, as are women.

Stop the genocide.

Sprintcyclist wrote on Apr 18^th, 2009 at 9:29pm:



Yes true Sprint and who would have it any other way?

I have heard of scenarios where women will become a master race in the future, even tho I suspect it will never happen ..but who knows?

Its quiet possible and nothing would need to be manipulated [surgically]for women are perfectly equipped to be masters of their own race....

Changing our own tyres is but one thing we would need to adapt too but hey...its doeable 

Sex would be a bit bleak tho..I dont know too many of us could make that concession..

Its just not possible to transplant a uterus..never been done , never likely to be.

Men just dont have the physiology to support a uterus...its absurd.

Men traditionally are not interested in babies and the newborn, its not their god given/earth given role. They see themselves as providers and are in the main,  unwilling/unyeilding in their ability/want to be anything else..unlike women who do go to work and still remain caregivers and sockwashers etc.



Men cannot multitask, is it just a cliche'? i dont think so..

Sprintcyclist wrote on Apr 19^th, 2009 at 6:05pm:


You're a man of basic desires Sprintcyclist, but then most of us are whether we're male or female.

Quote:


I didn't think so - I wonder where Easel heard that, but he made a point in another thread.  Men are still necessary for their strength, although I heard that some women are now taking supplements of testosterone to maintain their youth, agility and libido. It sounds interesting, but a side affect is hairiness.  What a choice!

oceanz wrote on Apr 20^th, 2009 at 6:58pm:


 The article stated that it was the hair on the face and chest that was the biggest problem.

Quote:


Strange.  You would think a hairy lady would be a real turnoff to the average male.  Maybe these blokes aren't average.

As technology improves, women will become more obsolete. Which is good because they are irrational, selfish, and controlling anyway.

Everything that is wrong with our culture is centered around femeninity. I wouldn't say to take The Bible literaly, but there is alot said about women when they were given paradise, and leave it to a woman to defy God. Appalogizing for her own flawed nature, and thinking she knows better then the divine creator. "It's my body WAGH!"

And man is guilty as well. But moreso guilty of following along like a lapdog. Men are only assertive by nature if they make themselves to be. Just as women are only decent human beings if they make themselves to be. As far as I see it, the primary nature of man is to be a coward and woman to be a souless abberation...

Jim Profit-

Quote:



mantra-
Quote:



I very kindly beg to differ here guys..but do you really think so?